The present invention relates to an arrangement, in particular for a motor vehicle, having a closing device which can be pivoted about an axis between a closed and an open position, for example a boot lid or a tailgate, a compensating device acting on the closing device, in particular at least one gas-pressure spring, which is pretensioned and a counter-force opposes the weight of the closing device, and a motor-driven drive which can be operated at least unidirectionally, in particular bidirectionally, in order to pivot the closing device about the axis in at least one direction, wherein the motor-driven drive is designed to be repellable, in order to facilitate manual actuation of the closing device.
Tailgates are known for example, which may be closed by means of a motor-driven drive which can be driven unidirectionally and opened by means of gas-pressure springs. In order to facilitate the opening of such a tailgate by the gas-pressure springs, the drive is designed to be repellable. However, in such an arrangement it is not possible to hold the tailgate in a rotational position which lies between the completely opened and the completely closed position of the tailgate. Rather, the tailgate is pressed from an intermediate position always into the completely opened position when the drive is switched off due to the force exerted by the gas-pressure springs.
In order to facilitate holding of the tailgate in an intermediate position, drives are used which are not repellable. In order to also facilitate the manual opening of the tailgate by means of the gas-pressure springs, the tailgate must however then be uncoupled from the non-repellable drive. A clutch is thus provided, but which causes additional effort and costs.
In addition, drives which can be operated bidirectionally are also known, wherein here too, a clutch is necessary in order to facilitate on the one hand holding of the tailgate in an intermediate position and on the other hand manual actuation of the tailgate by a user, for example when the drive is defective or the current supply to the drive is lost.
The object of the invention is to provide an arrangement of the type mentioned in the introduction which facilitates both holding of the closing device in an intermediate position and manual actuation of the closing device and thus manages without a clutch.
This object is achieved by an arrangement having the features of claim 1, and in particular in that friction means are provided, which act on the closing device both during manual actuation of the closing device and during actuation by the drive at a preset friction torque, wherein the friction torque within the pivoting range of the closing device or of a part range thereof is greater than the extent of the difference of a first torque produced by the weight of the closing device and a second torque produced by the counter-force of the compensating device.
The weight of the closing device produces a first torque in order to pivot the closing device into a first direction of rotation. The counter-force of the compensating device, for example at least one compression spring, in particular at least one gas-pressure spring, produces a second torque in order to pivot the closing device into the direction of rotation opposing the first direction of rotation. The first torque may thus be greater than the second torque, or vice versa. The extent of the difference of the two torques directed opposite to one another produces a resulting torque which is less than the friction torque of the friction means.
Within the scope of the invention, in each case the extent of the particular torque is to be understood by the first torque, the second torque and the friction torque. The friction torque may be preset by selecting the friction means or by friction means for which the friction torque can be adjusted.
The friction torque always counteracts the resulting torque, regardless of which of the two torques directed in opposite manner is greater. This facilitates holding of the closing device in any intermediate position of the pivoting range of the closing device. If the friction torque in all rotational positions of the closing device within the pivoting range is not greater than the resulting torque, but only in a part range thereof, the closing element may be held at least in the part range. The holding function, which is guaranteed in the state of the art by a non-repellable drive, is taken over here by the friction means exerting the friction torque.
Therefore it is also possible to design the motor-driven drive to be repellable, as a result of which in turn manual actuation of the closing device by the user, for example by the driver, is facilitated without a clutch having to be provided, so that costs may be saved. The friction means are not a coupling, since the friction torque acts on the closing device even when actuating the closing device by the drive. The friction torque acting during manual actuation corresponds in particular to the friction torque acting during actuation by the drive.
The weight of the closing device may be the force which is caused by the mass of the closing device alone. In particular the force which is caused by the mass of the closing device including a tolerance to be added thereto, for example for snow situated on the closing device, is however also to be understood by the weight of the closing device.
The torques directed in opposing manner are preferably essentially the same size at least at an average operating temperature of the compensating device. For drives which can be operated bidirectionally, the torque which has to be applied manually by the motor-drive drive or by a user, in order to pivot the closing device about the axis, is thus equally low for both directions of rotation, since in each case essentially only the friction torque has to be overcome. For different size torques, the torque to be applied by the drive or manually in one of the two directions of rotation is then indeed less than the friction torque, but in the other of the two directions of rotation greater than the friction torque.
It is particularly preferable if the compensating device is designed such that the counter-force exerted by it is independent of the temperature. It is thus possible to guarantee that the ratio of the two torques directed in opposing manner is constant in the entire operating temperature range of the compensating device.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the compensating device is arranged and/or orientated such that the rotational position of the closing device, in which the first torque assumes a maximum value, corresponds essentially to the rotational position of the closing device, in which the second torque assumes a maximum value. It is thus possible to guarantee with suitable coupling and orientation of the compensating device with respect to the closing device, that the ratio of the two torques directed in opposing manner is essentially constant in all rotational positions of the closing device which lie within the pivoting range or the part range thereof.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the friction torque is the same size in all rotational positions of the closing device which lie within the pivoting range or the part range thereof. The friction torque in the pivoting range or the part range thereof is thus greater than the extent of the maximum difference of the first torque and the second torque.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the friction means comprise a brake. A preset friction torque may thus be produced exactly and reliably. The brake may be, for example a magnetic brake, which can be operated preferably without maintenance.
The friction means may be connected, for example by one part rigidly to a wall, in particular of a motor vehicle, and by a further part rigidly to the axis or a shaft of the drive, wherein the friction torque can be produced between the two parts.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the compensating device, in particular a gas-pressure spring, is provided on the one side of the closing device, and the drive is provided on the other side of the closing device. In particular in this case, the drive may be designed as a linear drive, wherein the linear drive may be designed with a shape similar to the compensating device.
Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are indicated in the sub-claims, the description and the drawings.
Non-restricting exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawing and are described below.
The following show in each case in schematic representation,
The tailgate 13 shown in
Furthermore, a pretensioned gas-pressure spring 15 is provided on at least one side of the tailgate 13. The gas-pressure spring 15 is coupled on the one side to a wall 21 of the motor vehicle and on the other side to the tailgate 13. Coupling to the tailgate 13 takes place at a coupling point 19 of the tailgate 13 opposite the center of gravity 17 of the tailgate 13 with respect to the axis 11, wherein the coupling point 19 lies closer to the axis 11 than the center of gravity 17 of the tailgate 13. The part of the tailgate 13 having the coupling point 19 is thus arranged at right-angles to the part of the tailgate 13 having the center of gravity 17.
The arrangement is selected such that in the open rotational position according to
In the open rotational position according to
MG=FG·LG. (1)
In the open rotational position according to
MF=FF·LF. (2)
The torque MG produced by the weight FG and the torque MF produced by the spring force FF, in the open rotational position of the tailgate 13 shown in
The spring force FF of the gas-pressure spring 15 thus opposes the weight FG of the tailgate 13, so that the tailgate 13 is subjected to a resulting torque which corresponds to the difference of the two torques MG and MF.
If the gas-pressure spring 15 is transferred from the open rotational position to the closed rotational position shown in
In the closed rotational position according to
MG=½·FG·LG. (3)
In the closed rotational position according to
MF=½·FF·LF. (4)
The arrangement also comprises a maintenance-free magnetic brake 23, which is connected by one part rigidly to a vehicle wall 21 and by a further part rigidly to the axis 11 or a shaft of the drive, wherein one of the two parts can be rotated about the other of the two parts, wherein between the two parts during rotation a constant friction torque MR is produced, which is the same size over the entire operating temperature range of the arrangement and over the entire pivoting range of the tailgate 13 and opposes the resulting torque. This applies both for manual and for drive-side actuation of the tailgate 13.
The friction torque MR is thus selected and/or adjusted such that in any rotational position of the pivoting range of the tailgate 13, it is greater than the extent of the difference of the first torque MG produced by the weight FG and the second torque MF produced by the spring force FF of the gas-pressure spring 15, so that the tailgate 15 may be held in any intermediate position when the drive is switched off:
MR>|MG−MF|. (5)
So that the tailgate 15 may be held within the entire pivoting range, it is necessary that the friction torque MR is greater than the maximum occurring extent in the pivoting range of the difference of the first torque MG and the second torque MF.
In order to actuate the tailgate 13 by the drive, the drive must apply the following torque M in each rotational position of the pivoting range of the tailgate 13:
During opening:
M>MG−MF+MR. (6)
During closing:
M>MF−MG+MR. (7)
In order to actuate the tailgate 13 manually, the user must apply the following torque M in each rotational position of the pivoting range of the tailgate 13:
During opening:
M>MG−MF+MR+MA. (8)
wherein MA corresponds to the torque to be applied for repelling the drive.
During closing:
M>MF−MG+MR+MA. (9)
The weight FG, the spring force FF, the distance LG and the distance LF are preferably selected such that the torques MG and MF acting in opposing manner are essentially the same size at least in one rotational position of the pivoting range of the tailgate 13:
MG=MF. (10)
Due to the arrangement selected in
It is thus guaranteed that the torque to be applied by the drive or by a user in order to open or to close the tailgate 13 is as low as possible for both directions of rotation.
Conventionally the extent of the difference of the first torque MG and the second torque MF over the various rotational positions of the tailgate 13 will not be constantly 0, but will vary within certain limits and/or slightly. In order to guarantee essentially the same size torques MG and MF for all operating temperatures of the arrangement, a temperature-compensating gas-pressure spring 15 is preferably used, that is a gas-pressure spring 15, in which the exerted spring force FF is independent of the temperature to the greatest possible extent.
For gas-pressure springs 15, the spring force FF of which varies with the temperature, the spring force FF may be selected such that at least in an average operating temperature range of the gas-pressure spring 15, the torques MG and MF directed in opposing manner have essentially the same size. At a lower temperature, the spring force FF is then correspondingly smaller, so that even the torque MF produced by the spring force FF is less than the torque MG produced by the weight FG. At a higher temperature, the spring force FF is then correspondingly greater, so that even the torque MF produced by the spring force FF is greater than the torque MG produced by the weight FG.
However, the gas-pressure spring 15 may also be orientated to the tailgate 13 and/or coupled to the tailgate 13 in a manner different to that shown in
On the whole using the arrangement of the invention, a possibility is produced of guaranteeing holding of a closing device in any intermediate position, from which manual actuation of the closing device is possible without coupling.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0605008.2 | Mar 2006 | GB | national |
06024466 | Nov 2006 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6367199 | Sedlak et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6453614 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070214602 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |