The present invention relates to an air damper or valve actuator system with an alarm feature and a distributed system for monitoring a plurality of such actuator systems and methods for detecting and issuing an alarm indicative of potential impending mechanical failure of the air damper or valve systems.
Actuators are utilized to open and close air dampers in heat, air conditioning and ventilation systems (HVAC systems) and are also used to open and close valves in hydraulic systems. These actuators customarily include motors and controllers which respond to control signals applied thereto by external master HVAC or hydraulic control centers. In most situations, air damper actuators (which control air flow through HVAC ventilation systems) and valve actuators (which control hydraulic flow through pipes and tubes) are installed and located in places which are easy to reach by installers and subsequent maintenance personnel. Therefore, potential failures of these actuators are typically not critical and the installation of these actuators and the operation of the actuators are typically not protected or fall within the scope of recommended periodic maintenance contracts and building maintenance procedures.
However, some applications which utilize of air damper actuators or valve actuators are critical in that the failure of the actuator (to open or close upon command) can create significant economic or safety repercussions. For example, when an actuator is used in an unmanned cellular telephone transfer station which is remote and moderately inaccessible during winter time (or during other adverse weather conditions), the failure of the actuator may result in a system wide failure of the cellular telephone system. In this example, the actuator is an important part of the overall temperature control and command assembly system in the unmanned station. A failure of the actuator in these unmanned cellular telephone transfer stations may deprive thousand of customers of cellular telephone service for prolonged periods of time. Therefore, the cellular service provider is both economically at risk and its reputation for high quality “always ON” cellular telephone service may be affected. Another example of a critical application of these actuators is the utilization of an air damper actuator or valve actuator in laboratory ventilation hood systems. In these hood systems, the actuator controls the air flow of contaminated air away from the operator of the hood. If the actuator fails to open or close the damper or valve (due to damper/valve failure), dire consequences may result.
It may be beneficial to predict actuator/air damper/valve failures before the actuator and mechanically driven system ceases operation. In this manner, in a distributed command and control system, the central control station can note the deteriorated or poor condition of the actuator and associated mechanical system and issue appropriate personnel commands and recommendations for the preventive maintenance of the “at risk” actuator prior to actuator failure. Actuator failure usually results due to a failure of the air damper or valve or a “locking up” of the damper or valve rather than the actuator failing to operate. In other words, the actuated component fails, not the actuator per se.
Since the actuator motors are coupled, either directly or via a gear system, to mechanically movable air dampers or valves, the air dampers or valves may become sticky and difficult to move or motivate over time. Although less likely, hydraulic valves are subject to similar deteriorating operating conditions. Time frames of 5-10 years are not unusual. Further, the grease or lubricant utilized in and on air dampers or valves may become sticky or less lubricous and the mechanical damper or valve may generate resisting torque contrary to the movement of the actuator motor. Also, the air damper and valve may oxidate (rust) over time and such oxidation further restricts the movement of the air damper or valve. It is beneficial to develop a system which monitors the operational condition of the air damper actuator or valve actuator and, hence, all mechanical systems effected thereby.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an air damper or valve actuator system with an alarm feature for sensing indications of potential impending mechanical failure of the air damper or valve.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a distributed monitoring system for a plurality of actuators.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an actuator system with an alarm feature which monitors an electrical power characteristic during the actuator motor's motive operation thereby triggering an alarm when a sensor exceeds a predetermined value.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an actuator system which disables the alarm when the motor and the coupled air damper or valve reaches an operational end point (the physical limit of the air damper or valve).
The air damper or valve actuator system with an alarm may be part of a distributed monitoring system (communicatively linked to a central control station). The actuator system includes a motor coupled to the air damper or valve, an electrical power sensor for sensing an electrical power characteristic of the motor during the motor's motive operation of the air damper or valve and a threshold sensor. The threshold sensor determines and generates an alarm signal when the power characteristic exceeds a predetermined value during the motor's motive operation. An end point sensor is utilized to detect when the motor and coupled air damper or valve reaches a mechanical operational end point thereby disabling the alarm. The method for detecting and issuing an alarm indicative of potential impending mechanical failure includes sensing the power characteristic and determining and generating an alarm when the power characteristic exceeds a predetermined value before the motor driven actuator reaches a pre-set mechanical end position. The distributed system monitors a plurality of actuator systems and utilizes a central control station. Each actuator system, as part of the distributed system, generates and transmits its respective alarm signal to the central control station when the power characteristic exceeds a predetermined value during the motor's motive operation.
Further objects and advantages of the present invention can be found in the detailed description of the preferred embodiments when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention relates to an air damper or valve actuator system with an alarm feature and a distributed system for monitoring a plurality of such actuator systems and methods for detecting and issuing alarms indicative of potential impending mechanical failure of the air damper or valve actuator systems.
Further details of air damper and air valve actuators are found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,454 to Strauss, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
The power or control signal supplied to motor 46 is monitored by feedback monitor line 56. Signal conditioner 58 changes and modifies the monitor signal, representative of an electrical power characteristic of motor 46, and the resulting signal is applied to controller 40. In a preferred embodiment, the current supplied to motor 46, represented by current symbol i, is monitored by controller 40.
It should be appreciated that although a digital system is discussed herein in connection with controller 40, persons of ordinary skill in the art could produce an analog system having the same operational characteristics and functional elements as described in conjunction with the controllers illustrated in
In operation, controller 40 receives control signal from another command and control module (not shown) as is known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Upon receiving the appropriate power, command and control signal, controller 40 issues an appropriate power control to signal conditioner 44. Signal conditioner 44 in a digital environment converts the digital power control signal into a generally analog power control signal and that signal is applied to the input of motor 46. Motor 46 is then turned ON and the motor motivates or moves output shaft 47 and gear or coupler system 48 and mechanical output 50 and ultimately vanes 14 in air damper 16 or valve 34 associated with hydraulic line 35. Sensor 52, mechanically attached to mechanical output element 50, senses the movement of element 50, and generates a signal ultimately passing through conditioner 54 and to controller 40. At the same time (or relatively the same time), controller 40 monitors an electrical power characteristic, typically current i, applied to motor 46 based upon feedback monitor line 56. It is well known that, with respect to DC motors (typically utilized in air damper actuators and valve actuators), when the motors stop rotating due to excessive counter rotational torque applied to output elements 47,50, the power consumption of the motor, particularly current i, increases. This increase is sensed by controller 40 as captured by feedback monitor line 56. When the motor stops due to excessive counter rotational torque caused by the sticky damper or valve, the motor is placed in a “stall” condition. In a stall condition, the current i consumption of a motor greatly increases. Various electrical characteristics of the motor may be monitored to detect such stall condition.
Typically during normal operation, at maximum load, motor 46, as an example, may utilize 35 ma. Other motors use different amounts of current and are subject to different threshold levels. In a stalled condition, the typical 35 ma motor may utilize or draw 150 ma (a measure of current i). Further, it is typical that these types of motors may include an electronic or electrical control limiter which limits the supply current to a certain maximum value. As an example, 85 ma may be the maximum input current permitted by the electric control limit system. Since it is known that when the motor comes close to a stall condition, current consumption greatly increases, controller 40 includes a threshold sensing circuit or program function monitoring the feedback current i from line 56 such that when the current exceeds, in the example discussed herein, 75 ma, an alarm signal is generated. Upon detection of the alarm signal and if sensor 52 is still detecting rotational movement on mechanical output element 50 (the motor's motive operation), control 40 issues an alarm signal which is sent to the communication system. Controller 40 may supply an alarm signal to another transmitter and the transmitter may utilize communications link or channel 28 (
Memory 42 is utilized to store data, such as actuator id data, and particularly the predetermined threshold value which triggers the alarm signal. The threshold value at which an alarm is generated may be pre-set by the factory or may be set by the installer. Typically, factory settings are utilized.
The term “impending failure” is used because it is believed that the excessive feedback power signal will be indicative of a soon to fail mechanical system. However, at a minimum, the alarm system senses a failed damper or valve (one that refuses to open or close to the pre-set position).
Sensor 52 in a preferred embodiment is a potentiometer or variable resistor that outputs a variable electrical signal based upon rotational movement of mechanical output element 50 coupled thereto. Other types of sensors sensing rotational movement may be utilized. Also, sensor 50 could be connected directly to the output shaft 47 of motor 46. Further, sensor 52 could be located anywhere along the drive chain from motor 46, shaft 47, gear or coupler 48 and mechanical output element 50. Other types of sensors could be utilized.
The reason for utilizing sensor 52 or any other type of operational end point position sensor is as follows. Motor 46 generally drives the output system 47, 48, 50 and ultimately air damper 16 or valve 34 to a mechanical end point (either full open or full close or some other mechanically set position). Motor 46 continues to drive the system even beyond the mechanical end point reached by air damper 16 and valve 34, generally as a safety factor (the overdrive is a safety factor). Hence, when the air damper or valve reaches its mechanical end point position, motor 46 is still running. The motor then transitions into a stall condition (or near stall condition) and current on the power control line increases as is common in a stall condition. Control 40 must be able to discern or determine when motor 46 has driven the air damper or valve to its required end point position in contrast to a stall condition when the motor is attempting to move or motivate the air damper at an intermediate position. At intermediate positions, the motor is positively driving or operating the air damper or valve. Since these air dampers or valves are customarily located in remote locations either in large buildings or hidden under ventilation chemical hoods or in satellite stations remote from central control positions, the air dampers and valves or not regularly cleaned and relubricated. Therefore, the air dampers tend to get sticky and may ultimately not open or not close as designed by the engineer. The same is true regarding valves. Therefore, since the actuator motors drive the air dampers and the valves beyond the standard or pre-set mechanical end point, control 40 has to determine when the actuators reach the pre-set mechanical end point as distinct from the stall condition obtained when the actuator is in a potential impending mechanical failure mode. In other words, the stall condition during impending potential mechanical failure occurs prior to the time that sensor 52 senses the end position by the mechanical limits of the air damper or valve.
If sensor 52 is still moving (in a motive operation), as shown by the changing electrical condition (voltage, current or resistance) on the feedback line fed through signal conditioner 54, and the current i monitored by feedback monitor line 56 exceeds the alarm trigger threshold, and control 40 issues an alarm signal. If the position sensor 52 indicates no movement and, thereafter, current i from feedback line 56 approaches and exceeds alarm trigger threshold, the alarm is disabled (or the controller ignores the alarm (end position sensor overrides alarm)) because controller 40 has detected that mechanical output element 50 is at the mechanical limit for the air damper or valve actuator.
It is possible, although not recommended, that a timer may be utilized by control 40 rather than a position sensor 52. The timer will time the amount of time necessary to close the air damper or valve. Excessive feedback signals within the time cause an alarm whereas signals outside the time frame are ignored. Further, sensor 52 can be mechanically coupled to mechanical output element 50 or can optically sense the rotational movement of element 50 or utilize other type of electronic sensor system such as tachometers, accelerometers or items that have electromagnetic sensors. Further, an electromagnetic sensor may be attached or mounted to motor 46 to detect when the rotor of motor 46 stops movement. Memory 42 includes data specifically identifying the actuator and such data is attached or bundled with the alarm signal and sent to systems and communications link 28. Controller 40 has programming elements or routines which carry out the functional tests outlined herein.
If the actuator control system in
The claims appended hereto are meant to cover modifications and changes within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60589474 | Jul 2004 | US |