The present disclosure pertains to control devices and particularly to mechanical movers of devices. More particularly, the disclosure pertains of actuators.
The disclosure reveals an actuator system which may incorporate a motor, a motor controller connected to the motor, a processor connected to the motor controller, and a switch connected to the processor for engaging the motor to open and close an actuator shaft. The switch may have a position which is a test mode. Selecting the position of test mode may cause the motor to move the actuator shaft to a certain position to verify operation of the actuator shaft. The actuator shaft may stay in the certain position while the switch is in a position of test mode. The system may also incorporate a spring attached to the actuator shaft. If power fails to the motor, then the actuator spring or another mechanism may return the actuator shaft to a fail safe position. The test mode may alternatively be selected at a controller via the communications bus to the processor.
Coupled actuators may be used within heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. They may drive final control elements. Example applications may incorporate volume control dampers, mounted directly to the drive shaft of the actuator or remotely with the use of accessory hardware, rotary valves such as ball or butterfly valves mounted directly to the actuator drive shaft, and linear stroke or cage valves mounted with linkages to provide linear actuation. The actuator may also be used to operate ventilation flaps, louvers and other devices. The actuator may be a spring return device designed for clockwise or counterclockwise fail-safe operation with a continuously engaged mechanical spring. The spring may return the actuator or the mechanism that the actuator is operating to a fail-safe position within a certain time of power loss. An example of the certain time may be 25 seconds. The actuator may be mounted to provide clockwise or counterclockwise spring return by flipping or turning the unit over. The stroke of the actuator may be adjusted for an application at hand. An auxiliary knob may be used to control minimum position or switch position. For switch position, a degree of rotation may be selected for where the switch is desired to activate. The actuator may have an override of the control signal for certain applications such as for example freeze protection. The override may move the actuator to a full open or full closed position. One instance of position change is that the actuator may be designed to respond to direct digital control (DDC) instantaneous contact closures.
A present actuator with an auxiliary output may be adjustable via network communications. Auxiliary (aux) switches on actuators in some of the related art may have their setpoints established locally on the actuator. Setting an auxiliary switch setpoint may be rather difficult because of an actuator location (e.g., in a ceiling or behind equipment) and in general auxiliary switch setpoint user interfaces may be difficult to set and see (e.g., cam systems, rotating assemblies and adjustable detents) which could lead to setpoint inaccuracies. Also, there may be a fixed hysteresis with each of these solutions.
An additional problem with some of the solutions in the related art is that they are not necessarily adjustable as a relevant application changes. For example, an aux switch may be set to make or break at around 45 degrees of the actuator's stroke. If set for 45 degrees, the aux switch may virtually always trip at that position and can not necessarily be changed without a service technician physically changing the setpoint. Some applications would benefit by having the aux switch make at 20 degrees while opening, and break at 60 degrees while closing, or 20 degrees during a heat mode and 45 degrees during a cool mode, or vice versa.
Also, some of the aux switches of the related art may only be able to change state based on an actuator shaft position. There may be many applications where switching the aux switch based on temperature or some other variable (or combination of variables) would be beneficial.
The present approach may solve the issues by allowing the auxiliary switch setpoint and control parameters to be configured remotely over the bus in real time. This approach may be implemented with digital or analog outputs and there could be a multiple setpoint per relay solution.
The present approach may be effected by enhancing the software in the controller and communicating actuator systems. It may be used by allowing the auxiliary switch parameters to be programmable via a higher order controller. An example may incorporate using a Jade controller or Spyder™ controller with Niagara™ (or Fishsim™) to program the functionality of a Sylk™ Zelix™ communicating actuator over a Sylk bus. A Sylk bus may be a two-wire, polarity insensitive bus that may provide communications between a Sylk-enabled actuator and a Sylk-enabled controller. An example of the Sylk bus circuitry may be disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,966,438, issued Jun. 21, 2011, and entitled “Two-wire Communications Bus System”. U.S. Pat. No. 7,966,438, issued Jun. 21, 2011, is hereby incorporated by reference.
A present communicating actuator may have a network adjustable running time. Applications in the field may require or benefit from different running time actuators. In the related art, different running time actuators might be purchased by model number, or programmable actuators may be programmed at commissioning using an independent tool. This situation may dictate that a person pick one running time for the actuator and application at the beginning of an implementation of the actuator.
An example of an issue of running time may occur during system checkout in an OEM factory or in the field. An OEM or field technician may prefer a fast running time (10 seconds) so that the actuator system can be checked out quickly without having to wait for a 90 second actuator to run its time.
The present approach may incorporate an actuator that allows programmable running time via the local bus. Over the bus, the actuator's running time may be programmed to different values at different times during the actuator's lifecycle. For example, the actuator may be programmed for 15 second timing during a test, 30 second timing during a normal application mode, and 90 second timing during a saver mode.
The present actuator approach may be applied in a Jade™ economizer/Sylk Zelix system implementation. The Sylk bus hardware may be implemented on the controller and the actuator. Then the firmware in these products may be created to implement the adjustable running time functionality.
A present approach may incorporate a potentiometer address selection for an actuator. Setting a network address on a communicating actuator may be rather difficult. The actuator may be typically located in a hard to reach area (e.g., in a ceiling or behind equipment). Related art approaches may involve actuators that are typically small and hard to see and actuate (e.g., with dip switches/rotary encoders) and may use binary techniques as described herein which may require multiple microcontroller input pins.
The present approach may solve the issue by using a potentiometer to set and establish a network address on a communication actuator. The approach may allow for an address selector to be accessible from both sides of the actuator using a single potentiometer, the numbers and interface to be large and easy to read, and it may allow the address to be selected using only one analog input on the microcontroller.
The present approach may incorporate an actuator which has accessible onboard diagnostics. An issue in the related art may be that actuators in the field can fail or malfunction and of which many cases may be undetected. Such actuators may be wasting energy or giving up comfort for years before the failure is found.
The present approach may solve this issue by communicating alarms, status and diagnostics automatically over a bus. If an actuator fails, an alarm may be sent to the higher order controller for immediate notification. These software alarms and diagnostic features may be implemented in the firmware for a Sylk Zelix communicating actuator.
A controller or processor may provide on the communications bus one or more diagnostics items of a group consisting of high temperature warning, excessive noise on power line, record/report back electromotive force (EMF) on spring return, percentage of life detection, high amount of travel for given amount of time, hunting around a given point, actuator angle, communication normal indicator, stroke limiting, control valve (Cv) selection, flowrate on pressure independent control valve (PIC-V), set auxiliary switch, report auxiliary switch setting, report auxiliary switch status, report auxiliary switch current draw—auxiliary equipment status, if switch drives fan—verify fan shuts down before damper closes, if switch drives coils—verify heat exchanger running before opening/closing valve, report stuck valve/damper, PIC-V constant pressure—constant torque, changeover valve—no cycling for a period of time, time since last movement, date/time of first operation (commissioning), audible/detectable signal for location, device in warranty, device model number/serial number/date code, device type—outside air damper/standard ball valve/PIC-V valve/mixed air damper, actuator fitness/self-test routine—known system conditions, sensor—actual damper/valve position, super capacitor status, and energy consumption.
The present approach may incorporate an actuator test mode. There may be several approaches used by an actuator installer to verify that an actuator has been installed correctly. One approach may involve an operator at the control panel to cause the actuator to open and close. In another approach, the installer or maintainer may have access the connector and short the modulating input to cause the actuator to open, thus verifying that the actuator is working and connected properly.
With the test mode, there may be a test mode selection on a pot or switch that causes the actuator to move to its open position. An installer or maintainer may then just select Test Mode via the pot and verify an operation of the actuator without needing to access the connector or to communicate with a control operator.
Actuator software may verify that the test mode has been selected on the switch or potentiometer. The software may then exercise the following algorithm.
IF Test Mode THEN
Set actuator speed to maximum allowable speed
Cause actuator to open (move to end of its allowable span)
Remain in this position while in Test Mode.
A motor 112 may be connected to motor control 103. An output of motor 112 may be mechanically connected to a gear reduction train 113. Gear train 113 may have an actuator coupling or shaft 114 for connection to a mechanically controlled or operated device 115 such as, for example, a damper, valve, flap, louver, and so on. Gear train 113 may be connected to shaft position indicator 102.
Bus electronics and isolation transformer 109 may be connected to a communications bus 116. Outside actuator 120, bus 116 may be connected to controllers 117, sensors 118, actuators 119, and other devices 121 and various communication media 122. An outside power source 123 may be connected to power supply electronics.
Processor 101 may be shown in a diagram of
The following is a recap of the present actuator system. An actuator system for use with heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, may incorporate a motor, a motor controller connected to the motor, a processor connected to the motor controller, and a switch connected to the processor for engaging the motor to open and close an HVAC actuator shaft. The switch may have a position which is a test mode. Selecting the position of test mode may cause the motor to move the actuator shaft to a certain position to verify operation of the actuator shaft. The actuator shaft may stay in the certain position while the switch is in a position of test mode. The certain position of the actuator shaft may be a fully open position. If power fails to the motor, then the actuator shaft may return to a fail safe position. The actuator shaft may be coupled to a mechanism selected from a group consisting of a damper, a valve, ventilator flap and a louver.
The system may further incorporate a communications bus connected to the processor. The test mode may alternatively be selected at a controller via the communications bus to the processor. The communications bus may have two polarity-insensitive wires.
An actuator system for use with heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment, may incorporate an HVAC actuator. The actuator may have a motor, a gear train connected to the motor, a processor connected to the motor, an actuator shaft coupling connected the gear train, a shaft position sensor connected to the actuator shaft coupling and the processor, and a mode selector connected to the processor. Selecting a test mode on the mode selector may result in the actuator shaft coupling moving to a test mode position. The actuator shaft coupling may be attached to a mechanism selected from a group consisting of a damper, a valve, a ventilation flap and a louver.
The processor may incorporate actuator software to verify selecting the test mode on the mode selector. The actuator software may exercise an algorithm. The algorithm may state, if in test mode then set actuator to maximum allowable speed, cause actuator to open by moving to an end of an allowable span, and remain in this position while in test mode.
The mode selector may be part of a potentiometer incorporating addresses for the actuator. The actuator system may further incorporate a housing enclosing the actuator. The mode selector may be accessible on at least two places of the housing for selecting the test mode.
An approach for verifying that a heating, ventilating and air conditioning actuator has been installed correctly, may incorporate installing a mode selector on an HVAC actuator, connecting the mode selector to a processor of the actuator, and verifying that the actuator has been installed correctly by turning the mode selector to test mode to move the actuator to an end of an allowable span of the actuator within a predetermined time.
The actuator may return to a fail safe position upon a failure of electrical power to the actuator.
The processor may incorporate actuator software to verify that the mode selector has been turned to a test mode. The actuator software may then exercise an algorithm. The algorithm may state, if test mode then set actuator speed to maximum allowable speed, cause actuator to open by moving to an end of its allowable span, and remain in this position while in test mode.
The mode selector may incorporate a potentiometer having a plurality of mode selections. The potentiometer may be connected to the processor. The actuator may be enclosed within a housing. The mode selector may be accessible on at least two places of the housing.
The approach may further incorporate connecting the processor of the actuator to a remote controller via a communications bus, and alternatively selecting the test mode for the actuator at the controller. This communications bus may consist of two polarity-insensitive wires.
In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.
Although the present system and/or approach has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the related art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3767985 | King | Oct 1973 | A |
3829848 | Eickelberg et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4129847 | Teichert | Dec 1978 | A |
4302931 | White et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4549446 | Beeson | Oct 1985 | A |
4628268 | Matsubara | Dec 1986 | A |
4652417 | Sutherland et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4673920 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4688183 | Carll et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4742475 | Kaiser et al. | May 1988 | A |
4794314 | Janu et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4837731 | Levine et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4854852 | Patton et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4878001 | Hagikura et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4919328 | Hara et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4922171 | Ohi | May 1990 | A |
5025206 | Germer et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5080140 | Ostrand et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5081405 | Nelson | Jan 1992 | A |
5123875 | Eubank et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5153493 | Jornod et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159534 | Hudson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5180959 | Christopher | Jan 1993 | A |
5318516 | Cosmescu | Jun 1994 | A |
5416781 | Ruiz | May 1995 | A |
5422553 | MacLennan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431182 | Brown | Jul 1995 | A |
5446677 | Jensen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454273 | Smith | Oct 1995 | A |
5465031 | Nilssen | Nov 1995 | A |
5584319 | Cholin | Dec 1996 | A |
5621398 | Blair et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5682329 | Seem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5711480 | Zepke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5744923 | Strauss et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5836814 | Cunningham, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848609 | Marchessault et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5938524 | Cunningham, Jr. | Aug 1999 | A |
6015142 | Ulicny | Jan 2000 | A |
6021955 | Pasch et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025788 | Diduck | Feb 2000 | A |
6035878 | Adams et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051948 | Vepy | Apr 2000 | A |
6059046 | Lowry | May 2000 | A |
6099405 | Cunningham, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178997 | Adams et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198243 | Ritmanich et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249100 | Lange | Jun 2001 | B1 |
RE37589 | Mueller | Mar 2002 | E |
6431203 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431231 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443422 | Gluf, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6514138 | Estepp | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6629886 | Estepp | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651952 | Hightower et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6725976 | Oh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6838988 | Lennartz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851620 | Hill | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6915171 | Mayer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922123 | Lalonde et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6954044 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6979965 | McMillan et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021072 | McMillan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024856 | Ando et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031880 | Seem et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033268 | Caliendo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050885 | Fiegle et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058542 | Hauhia et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066273 | Tan | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079831 | Schwartzman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105949 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7188481 | DeYoe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7241218 | Van Becelaere et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258280 | Wolfson | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265512 | McMillan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7378980 | McFarland | May 2008 | B2 |
7401541 | McCarroll et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7431568 | Brown et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442068 | Hammer et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446494 | Grabinger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451759 | Weiss et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460013 | Osborne et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7476988 | Mulhouse et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477028 | Bokusky et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492233 | Grabinger | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7525266 | Bolusky et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533635 | Bradley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557549 | Underhill | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7586279 | Theunissen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7622828 | Grabinger et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633393 | Bonne | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636613 | Borah et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639127 | Kastli | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653459 | Pouchak et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664573 | Ahmed | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672913 | Kaplan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697492 | Petite | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7774441 | Frutiger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784291 | Butler et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787994 | Wacker | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7798170 | Hotz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802734 | Stanimirovic | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831338 | Haydu | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7840311 | Grohman | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7852627 | Schmitt et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7852765 | Neuman et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7859207 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876217 | Laackmann et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891241 | McSheffrey et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7922149 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944672 | Chiang | May 2011 | B1 |
7966438 | Punyko et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8031650 | Petite et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043148 | Eguchi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046896 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8084980 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8218547 | Van Steen et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251785 | Schmitt et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8345077 | Hayashi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8588983 | Grabinger et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8764529 | Cook et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777341 | Amaral et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8950461 | Adams et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9155229 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9322569 | Scharf et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20030052180 | Huhn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030178257 | Oh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040124797 | Takeuchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040212336 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050093685 | Kachouh | May 2005 | A1 |
20050127861 | McMillan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060035580 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060130502 | Wruck et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070060039 | Cook et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070120664 | Bilbrey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070226318 | Rydberg et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080051024 | Caliendo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080156887 | Stanimirovic | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080244104 | Clemente | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080258253 | Fey et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080316039 | White et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005917 | Hole | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033513 | Salsbury et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090073628 | Nitsche | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082880 | Saunders | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090101725 | Dolan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090111373 | Hollender et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090181611 | Hollender et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100077254 | Erdmann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102973 | Grohman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106262 | Schreyer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106836 | Schreyer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109675 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121613 | Rosca et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134934 | Matsubara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100141243 | Divicino et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198411 | Wolfson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253270 | Kuster et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110070904 | McFarland | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110270446 | Scharf et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120091804 | Altonen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120229064 | Jeung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120302150 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140295750 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150111489 | Chopra | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150226001 | Adams et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202004011803 | Dec 2004 | DE |
0511828 | Nov 1992 | EP |
1170036 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1901145 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2241834 | Oct 2010 | EP |
1172789 | Dec 1969 | GB |
57086544 | May 1982 | JP |
60091411 | May 1985 | JP |
63257802 | Oct 1988 | JP |
1215633 | Aug 1989 | JP |
2009118155 | May 2009 | JP |
WO 2010000077 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“555 Timer IC,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 9 pages, Aug. 7, 2012. |
Beckhoff New Automation Technology, “Application Note DK9222-0810-0035, I/O, Building Automation,” 7 pages, Aug. 2010. |
Belimo, “Belimo Gateway MP to Modbus RTU-UK24MOD,” Product Information, 20 pages, Feb. 2010. |
Belimo, “Damper Actuator Plug-In Description/Documentation #Tools-007-E_20.11.05,” 11 pages, Nov. 20, 2005. |
Belimo, “MP-Bus-Interface—for Belimo Damper Actuators,” 16 pages, Oct. 2009. |
Belimo, “Perfect for Each and Every Connection, Bus Integration of Actuators and Sensors in Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems,” 10 pages, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
Belimo, “Ring Bus Solution by Belimo, State of the Art System for Bus Integrated Fire Protection and Smoke Control,” 6 pages, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/250,889, filed Sep. 30, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/291,928, filed Nov. 8, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,029, filed Nov. 9, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,041, filed Nov. 9, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,051, filed Nov. 9, 2011. |
Delta Controls, “HVAC Application Controllers DVC-V322,” Document Edition 2.0, 7 pages, Feb. 2005. |
Distech Controls, “ECC-VAV/ECC-VVT easyCONTROLS LonMark Certified Application Specific Single Duct Variable Air Volume/Variable Volume Temperature Controllers,” 5 pages, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
Echelon, “LNS Plug-In Belimo,” 1 page, 2011. |
Honeywell, “3 Nm, 5 Nm Series Spring Return Direct Coupled Actuators, MS3103, MS3105, MS4103, MS4105, MS7403, MS7405, MS7503, MS7505, MS8103, MS8105,” Installation Instructions, 12 pages, 2011. |
Honeywell, “Advanced Control from a Unitary Controller,” 8 pages, Mar. 2009. |
Honeywell, “Jade Economizer Module (Model W7220),” Installation Instructions, 20 pages, 2010. |
Honeywell, “ML4202, ML4302, ML4702, ML4802, ML8202, ML8302 Fast-Acting, Two-Position Actuators for Fire/Smoke Control Applications,” Installation Instructions, 4 pages, 2005. |
Honeywell, “SO5, S10, S20 Series Spring Return Direct Coupled Actuators, MS4105, MS4110, MS4120, MS71XX, MS7505, MS7510, MS7520, MS8105, MS8110, MS8120,” Product Data, 16 pages, 2008. |
Johnson Controls Unitary Products, “YCCS Zone Bypass Damper Assembly,” 6 pages, 2008. |
Microchip Technology, Inc., “Using PWM to Generate Analog Output AN538,” 2 pages, 1997. |
Motorola, “Triacs Silicon Bidirectional Triode Thyristors,” 2 pages, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
MP-Bus Technology by Belimo, “MP-Bus Convenient and Secure Integration of Belimo Actuator Drives,” 1 page, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
Noliac, “Noliac Acquires Piezo Actuator Drive Technology from Siemens,” 2 pages, prior to Sep. 30, 2011. |
On Semiconductor, “AND8054/D Designing RC Oscillator Circuits with Low Voltage Operational Amplifiers and Comparators for Precision Sensor Applications,” 3 pages, Jul. 2001. |
Siemens, “BACnet ATEC,” Technical Specification Sheet Document No. 149-825, 4 pages, Apr. 9, 2010. |
Siemens, “Siemens, BACnet VAV Actuator,” Technical Specification Sheet Rev. AA, 5 pages, Jan. 2008. |
Tridium, “Belimo and Tridium to Jointly Develop a Next Generation VAV Controller with Wireless Communications,” 2 pages, May 15, 2008. |
Wang et al., “Research on Reliability of a Hybrid Three-Redundant Electro-Mechanical Actuator,” Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Aug. 9-12, 2009. |
Honeywell, “Spyder Sylk Enhanced, Advanced Control From a Unitary Controller,” 8 pages, Mar. 2009. |
Honeywell, “Spyder Sylk Enhanced,” 11 pages, Oct. 2008. |
ControlTrends Article Entitled, “Honeywell Zelix Actuators,” 1 page, published on the internet Nov. 11, 2009. |
Ruff, “Servo Motor Control Application on a Local Interconnection Network (LIN),” Rev. 1.0, Dec. 2005. |
Siemens, “OpenAir—Robust Damper Actuators for Energy-Efficient Ventilation, Durable Actuators for HVAC Applications, Air Volume Controllers as well as Fire and Smoke Protection Dampers,” 10 pages, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130103324 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |