The present disclosure relates generally to mechanical actuators and devices incorporating the same, and more particularly to patient mobility devices which feature active response actuators.
Mobility impaired individuals frequently require assistance in moving from one location to another. Traditionally, this need has been met with the ubiquitous wheelchair. However, wheelchairs require certain minimum areas for operation. For example, in a hospital setting, sufficient space must be set aside in a room to allow a patient to move from a bed to a wheel chair to a doorway. This space must typically account for the fact that a wheelchair usually requires a certain minimum area to execute turns. Unfortunately, hospital space is typically at a premium. It is thus desirable to minimize the amount of space required to accommodate a wheelchair.
Other individuals, such as amputees, suffer loss of functionality. Various prosthetic devices have been developed in the art to restore some of functionality to these individuals. Some of these devices are depicted in
In one aspect, a robotic bed is provided which comprises (a) a bed frame supported on a set of wheels; (b) a mattress supported on said bed frame, said mattress having first and second opposing sides; (c) first and second opposing rails disposed parallel to said first and second opposing sides of said bed; (d) first and second rollers disposed on said first and second rails, respectfully; (e) a sheet which extends between said first and second rollers, said sheet having opposing end portions which are wrapped around said first and second rollers, respectively; and a first set of actuators which rotate said first and second rollers.
In another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element which is rotatably attached to the first structural element across a joint; (c) a first rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a first axis; and (d) a second rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a second axis; wherein each of said first and second rotary actuators is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and rotary actuators.
In a further aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a joint attached to said first structural element; and (c) a first actuator which rotates said first structural element about an axis centered on said joint; wherein said first actuator is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and star compound actuators.
In still another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; and (c) a first actuator which moves said first structural element relative to said second structural element; wherein said first actuator is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and star compound actuators.
In yet another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; and (c) a first actuator which moves said first structural element relative to said second structural element; wherein said first actuator includes (1) an internal gear, (2) first and second parallel eccentric gears which mesh with said internal gear; (3) a crankshaft equipped with first and second eccentrics which are 180° out-of-phase and which drive said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively, (4) a prime mover which drives said crankshaft, (5) first and second crosslinks which prevent the rotation of said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively, and (6) first and second sets of splines which engage said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively.
In still another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; (c) a link disposed about said joint, said link terminating in a first receptacle on a first end thereof, and terminating in a second receptacle on a second end thereof; (d) first and second actuators disposed in said first and second receptacles, respectively; (e) a first brace terminating in a third receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said first structural element on a second end thereof; and (f) a second brace terminating in a fourth receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said second structural element on a second end thereof; wherein said first actuator is disposed in a container formed by said first and third receptacles, and said second actuator is disposed in a container formed by said second and fourth receptacles.
In another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element; (c) a first link attached on a first end thereof to said first structural element, and terminating in a first receptacle on a second end thereof; (d) a second link attached on a first end thereof to said second structural element, and terminating in a second receptacle on a second end thereof; and (e) a first actuator disposed in a container formed by said first and second receptacles.
In still another aspect, a mobile assist platform is provided which comprises (a) a platform including a frame supported on a set of wheels, and a center portion which is rotatable with respect to said frame; (b) a chair attached to said center portion of said platform; (c) a steering column, disposed on said center portion of said platform and adjacent to said chair, which steers at least one of said set of wheels; and (d) a set of guide arms disposed adjacent to said chair; wherein each of said guide arms includes first and second arm segments, and is equipped with at least one rotary actuator which moves said first arm segment relative to said second arm segment.
In yet another aspect, a combination is provided which includes an orthotic device and a pancake actuator which imparts motion to the orthotic device. The pancake actuator comprises (a) a frame and a plate disposed in opposing relation to each other; (b) a stator disposed between said frame and said plate; (c) a rotor disk equipped with a rotor and disposed within said stator such that said rotor is adjacent to said stator; (d) a pinion gear; and (e) first and second star gears disposed between said frame and said plate, wherein each of said first and second star gears meshes with said pinion gear and said frame.
The need spectrum of patients requiring mobility assistance is broad, and is summarized in TABLE 1 below.
The development of a first generation of patient assist devices is summarized in TABLES 2-3 below, and some of the devices and components resulting from this development effort are depicted in
A system architecture for a patient assist device is preferably responsive and reconfigurable to match as many real physical motion needs as possible, and to permit response to changes in those needs. This may require an open architecture which preferably involves low cost actuators and operating software (OS). The low cost actuators utilized in such an architecture are preferably standardized, plug-and-play, and highly-certified in a minimum set for mass production for all feasible systems. The operating software is preferably an open software architecture that permits constant up-dates to control a very large range of systems from 3 up to 20 DOF under human command.
Fortunately, a suitable OS system is widely available in the form of the OSCAR (Operating Software Components for Advanced Robotics) operating system developed at the University of Texas, and the ROS (Robot Operating System) operating system developed by the Southwestern Research Institute (SwRI) in San Antonio, Tex. These operating systems require specialization for the assist operating environment. The actuator, however, is well understood from a design environment, but should be prototyped, tested, certified, and detailed to enable mass production at the lowest possible cost. Given the OS and the minimum set of actuators (say, 5 to 10), it then becomes possible for nominally-trained personnel to meet each assist need (with a configuration manager) and to enable the caregiver to maintain the system to provide maximum availability.
Systems are disclosed herein which are plug-and-play systems that utilize a minimum set of highly-certified, low cost actuators matched by a similar selection of operational software components. Preferred embodiments of these systems are based on the components in TABLE 9 below:
The particular embodiment of the MAP 501 depicted further comprises an extensible hand pedestal 511, a guide arm attachment 513, a foot socket 515, a hand grip pedestal 517, a bayonet lock 519, a folding arms and seat combination 521 which is configured to clear the hand grip pedestal 517, a seat pedestal 523, and a seat support roller 525. Though not shown, the depicted embodiment of the MAP 501 further comprises one or more batteries and controller circuitry.
With reference to
The CPE rotary actuator 101 is further equipped with first and second crosslinks 117 and with first and second eccentric gears 121. Each eccentric gear 121 is disposed between a crosslink 117 and one of first and second output plates 123 (also referred to herein as output gears).
As seen in
The CPE rotary actuator 101 of
As noted above, in human assist and rehabilitation, there is a primary need for a very thin actuator capable of reasonable torque and high out-of-plane force/moments. To be useful, such an actuator must also be plug-and-play with quick-change interfaces (for rapid repair) and low cost by means of mass production.
The lowest cost actuators may ultimately be the most economically important. Low cost typically dictates the use of standard gear and bearing manufacture. Nonetheless, the standard epicyclic gear train is not preferable for many human assist and rehabilitation applications because it contains too many bearings, a rotating high inertia gear cage, and an excess of structure to maintain the gear alignments under high load or inertia forces.
Despite the foregoing, the epicyclic gear train also has some useful features. In particular, it has concentricity about a central axis, and utilizes mutually supportive planet gears which mesh with central sun gears. This concentricity keeps all forces balanced about the central axis, minimizes or eliminates out-of-plane moments, and imparts low force/moments on the gear train shell structure. Also, the moving cage structure enables the planets to mesh with a stationary internal gear in the actuator shell. With care, this arrangement enables reductions of 40 up to 60-to-1 in a two-plane configuration.
Drawbacks of the epicyclic gear train include its high cage inertia, the excess of bearings, and the centrifugal forces of the planets on their bearings, all of which lead to higher deformations, more noise, more wear, and more backlash. To address these issues, it is preferred that all planet bearings be fixed (stationary) in strong/rugged cross plates (or what may be called strong back walls) which join to the outer cylindrical shell to the central gear axis to form a rugged and shock resistant structure. All bearings are preferably low velocity bearings except for the critical input pinion, which is usually driven by a high-speed prime mover. The star compound, therefore, has star gears, not planet gears. These star gears have fixed axes and can have one or two planes. Given two planes enables the use of a clutch in between to change the reduction ratios (as in two-speed drive wheels on vehicles). The star gear axes can then be extended through a strong back wall to a third plane of star gears to drive an internal output gear which provides a further reduction of about 6-to-1.
Altogether, this 3-plane star gear may provide reductions of 40 up to 60-to-1 in a very compact package. The last “internal” gear is the output usually supported by a very stiff/compact large diameter/small cross-section bearing. This bearing may be a ball bearing, a cross-roller bearing, or a grooved roller bearing, progressively with higher load capacity in a lower volume. All of these features make the star compound superior to the epicyclic gear train.
The gear train of the rotary actuator 201 includes an electric prime mover, which is preferably a brushless DC electric motor (BLDC). The BLDC is disposed in the same shell to create a fully integrated actuator. The stator 205 becomes the rugged outer structure of the actuator 201 joining the two strong back walls (the top plate 203 and the stationary frame 209) which holds the principal bearings 219.
The large diameter rotor 207 is inside the stator 205 with a rotor disk 211 supported by two central axis bearings. Preferably, this rotor 207 produces a high torque at relatively low speeds (such as, for example, 700 RPM). The rotor disk 211 is connected directly to the pinion gear 223 (r1) with an axis supported by a bearing in the top plate 203 and the stationary frame 209. The pinion gear 223 (r1) drives the fixed star gears 215 (r2) (preferably 3) which are concentric with the central axis of the actuator 201. The fixed star gears 215 are supported by bearings in the stationary frame 209 which is connected to the stator shell.
Each star gear axis contains first 215 and second 217 star gears (r2, r3) rigidly connected to each other. First 215 and second 217 star gears (r1, r2) are in plane 1 of the star compound gear train, while star gear 217 (r3) and internal stationary gear 231 (r4), which is a rigid part of the output plate 213, are in plane 2 of the star compound gear train. Star gear 217 (r3) then drives internal stationary gear 231 (r4). The internal stationary gear (r4) is supported by principal bearing 219, which is preferably a large diameter, small cross-section (and preferably low cost) ball bearing. The principal bearing 219 is preferably capable of carrying 3x (or more) thrust load than radial load, since all balls (there are many) simultaneously work to carry the thrust load.
To work in a quiet environment (almost no noise), it is preferred that the first star gears 215 (r2) are high quality plastic nylon gears. The top plate preferably plugs into the supporting structure (of the mobile platform) with a quick-change interface (both mechanically and electrically). The power and communication wiring extends through a wire channel 227 in the top plate 203 to the stator 205 (and related sensors), and also through the central axis to support the next actuator (i.e., by means of wire channel 227).
An issue of cost may arise in the unique nature of the principal bearing. Otherwise, very low cost BLDC's, controllers, sensors, star gears, supporting bearings should be mass produced to create a minimum set of this pancake actuator to populate a large population of assist/rehabilitation systems (mobile platforms, lifting arms, robot gurneys, orthotics, etc.). The goal is to maximize performance while reducing cost, making quick assembly possible by the clinician and rapid repair by the individual or caregiver.
To reduce costs, the actuator of
It is notable that the actuators of
The above description of the present invention is illustrative, and is not intended to be limiting. It will thus be appreciated that various additions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be construed in reference to the appended claims. It will also be appreciated that the various features set forth in the claims may be presented in various combinations and sub-combinations in future claims without departing from the scope of the invention. In particular, the present disclosure expressly contemplates any such combination or sub-combination that is not known to the prior art, as if such combinations or sub-combinations were expressly written out.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. provisional application No. 62/430,916, filed Dec. 6, 2016, having the same inventor and the same title, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
381395 | Love | Apr 1888 | A |
1973185 | Treojevich | Sep 1934 | A |
2140012 | Hayes | Dec 1938 | A |
2195783 | Ravigneaux | Apr 1940 | A |
2231784 | Von Thungen | Feb 1941 | A |
2241764 | Bollinger et al. | May 1941 | A |
2311006 | Trbojevich | Feb 1943 | A |
2320757 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1943 | A |
2534134 | Kirkpatrick | Dec 1950 | A |
2627190 | Böttcher | Feb 1953 | A |
2703021 | Stoeckicht | Mar 1955 | A |
2844052 | Stoeckicht | Jul 1958 | A |
2861465 | Winkle et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
3064491 | Bishop | Nov 1962 | A |
3095757 | Thoma | Jul 1963 | A |
3150532 | Bixby | Sep 1964 | A |
3251236 | Wildhaber | May 1966 | A |
3396632 | Leblanc | Aug 1968 | A |
3397589 | Moore | Aug 1968 | A |
3563354 | Sigg | Feb 1971 | A |
3719841 | Ritsema | Mar 1973 | A |
3742568 | Hahlbeck | Jul 1973 | A |
3772932 | Nagano | Nov 1973 | A |
3813821 | Takahashi | Jun 1974 | A |
3823620 | Bricout | Jul 1974 | A |
3888134 | Miranda | Jun 1975 | A |
3901092 | Romick | Aug 1975 | A |
3907470 | Harle et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3941013 | Miller | Mar 1976 | A |
4024959 | Gruner | May 1977 | A |
4158967 | Vatterott | Jun 1979 | A |
4186626 | Chamberelain | Feb 1980 | A |
4237741 | Huf et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4280583 | Stieg | Jul 1981 | A |
4297918 | Perry | Nov 1981 | A |
4378660 | Weiner | Apr 1983 | A |
4381828 | Lunn et al. | May 1983 | A |
4407382 | Ddziuba et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4416345 | Barthelemy | Nov 1983 | A |
4417642 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4461375 | Brown | Jul 1984 | A |
4462271 | Stieg | Jul 1984 | A |
4467568 | Bloch et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4505166 | Tesar | Mar 1985 | A |
4540073 | Rogier | Sep 1985 | A |
4547107 | Krause | Oct 1985 | A |
4554842 | Wood, III | Nov 1985 | A |
4560056 | Stockton | Dec 1985 | A |
4569252 | Harper | Feb 1986 | A |
4583413 | Lack | Apr 1986 | A |
4624154 | Kraft et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4706512 | McKernon et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4721013 | Stuer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4817773 | Knodel et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5355743 | Tesar | Oct 1994 | A |
5880964 | Schall | Mar 1999 | A |
5908372 | Janek | Jun 1999 | A |
6791215 | Tesar | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7081062 | Tesar | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122926 | Tesar | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7431676 | Tesar | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7604559 | Fujimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7722494 | Tesar | May 2010 | B2 |
8033942 | Tesar | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8403789 | Janek | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8516918 | Jacobsen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9956093 | Harris | May 2018 | B1 |
20040007923 | Tesar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040102274 | Tesar | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103742 | Tesar | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050168084 | Tesar | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070168081 | Shin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070249457 | Tesar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080257088 | Tesar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269922 | Tesar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090075771 | Tesar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20120088622 | Tesar | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120204671 | Tesar | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215450 | Ashok et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130023373 | Janek | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130217530 | Tesar | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140224064 | Tesar | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228162 | Tesar | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246893 | Tesar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150102655 | Tesar | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150292601 | Tesar | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150330455 | Tesar | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150351938 | Moser et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150354667 | Tesar | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374573 | Horst | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160030202 | Nishikawa | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160030272 | Angold | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160067058 | Herr | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160074182 | Celebi | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160091054 | Tesar | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160095720 | Behzadi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160113831 | Hollander | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160137051 | Tesar | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138679 | Tesar | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006125282 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bram Vanderborght, Nikos G. Tsagarakis, Claudio Semini, Ronald Van Ham, Darwin G. Caldwell, “MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable Compliant Actuator with Stiffening Characteristic for Energy Efficient Hopping”, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Kobe International Conference Center, Kobe, Japan, May 12-17, 2009). |
T. Ménard, G. Grioli and A. Bicchi, “A real time robust observer for an Agonist-Antagonist Variable Stiffness Actuator”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference (Karlsruhe, May 6-10, 2013). |
Giorgio Carpino, Dino Accoto, Fabrizio Sergi, Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte and Eugenio Guglielmelli, “A Novel Compact Torsional Spring for Series Elastic Actuators for Assistive Wearable Robots”, J. Mech. Des 134(12), 121002 (Oct. 19, 2012). |
Matteo Laffranchi, Hide Sumioka, Alexander Sproewitz, Dongming Gan, Nikos G. Tsagarakis, “Compliant Actuators, Adaptive Modular Architectures for Rich Motor Skills (AMARSi)”, ICT-248311 D2.1 (Mar. 2011). |
Gill A. Pratt and Matthew M. Williamson, “Series Elastic Actuators”, IEEE, 399-406 (1995). |
Matthew M. Williamson, “Series Elastic Actuators”, Masters Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Feb. 1995). |
Micromotion, Product Catalog, “Precision Microactuators”, downloaded Jan. 16, 2015 from http://www.orlin.co.uk/PDFs/Micromotion_product_brochure.pdf. |
Schaeffler KG, Linear technology Division, “Miniature Linear Actuator with Toothed Belt Drive”, Series MLFI20-ZR (Jan. 2006). |
Nicholas Paine, “Design and Control Considerations for High-Performance Series Elastic Actuators”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1-11 (2013). |
D.F.B. Haeufle, M.D. Taylor, S. Schmitt, H. Geyer, “A clutched parallel elastic actuator concept:towards energy efficient powered legs in prosthetics and robotics”, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (Rome, Jun. 24-27, 2012). |
Markus Baeuml, Florian Dobre, Harald Hochmuth, Manfred Kraus, Hartmut Krehmer, Roland Langer, Dominik Reif, “The Chassis of the Future”, The Schaeffler Symposium Book (Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG, 2014). |
Fabrizio Sergi, Melissa M. Lee, and Marcia K. O'Malley, “Design of a series elastic actuator for a compliant parallel wrist rehabilitation robot”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics , pp. 1-6 (Seattle, WA, Jun. 24-26, 2013). |
Sidharth Iyer, “Modeling and Testing of a Series Elastic Actuator with Controllable Damping”, Master's Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (Jan. 2012). |
Agostino De Santis, Bruno Siciliano, Alessandro De Luca, Antonio Bicchi, “An atlas of physical human-robot interaction”, Mech. Mach. Theory (2007). |
Michael David Taylor, “A Compact Series Elastic Actuator for Bipedal Robots with Human-Like Dynamic Performance”, Master's Thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (Aug. 2011). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180153757 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62430916 | Dec 2016 | US |