Actuators for patient mobility devices, patient healthcare devices and human prosthetics

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11166864
  • Patent Number
    11,166,864
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 6, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 9, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Bahena; Christie L
    Agents
    • Fortkort; John A.
    • Fortkort & Houston PC
Abstract
An orthotic device is provided which includes a first structural element; a second structural element which is rotatably attached to the first structural element across a joint; a first rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a first axis; and a second rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a second axis. Each of the first and second rotary actuators is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and rotary actuators.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates generally to mechanical actuators and devices incorporating the same, and more particularly to patient mobility devices which feature active response actuators.


BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

Mobility impaired individuals frequently require assistance in moving from one location to another. Traditionally, this need has been met with the ubiquitous wheelchair. However, wheelchairs require certain minimum areas for operation. For example, in a hospital setting, sufficient space must be set aside in a room to allow a patient to move from a bed to a wheel chair to a doorway. This space must typically account for the fact that a wheelchair usually requires a certain minimum area to execute turns. Unfortunately, hospital space is typically at a premium. It is thus desirable to minimize the amount of space required to accommodate a wheelchair.


Other individuals, such as amputees, suffer loss of functionality. Various prosthetic devices have been developed in the art to restore some of functionality to these individuals. Some of these devices are depicted in FIGS. 14-15.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a listing of some powered wheelchair systems which are known to the art.



FIG. 2 is an illustration of wheelchair and manipulator platforms and actuators which afford high performance-to-cost ratios.



FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of a mobile assist platform (MAP) in accordance with the teachings herein.



FIG. 4 is a series of illustrations depicting the functionality of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of a multi-function wheelchair (MFW) in accordance with the teachings herein.



FIG. 5 is a series of illustrations depicting the functionality of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of a multi-function bed and MAP in accordance with the teachings herein.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of an orthotic wrist in accordance with the teachings herein which has 2 degrees of freedom.



FIG. 7 is an exploded view of the orthotic device of FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a particular, non-limiting embodiment of an upper extremity orthotic device in accordance with the teachings herein which has 7 degrees of freedom.



FIG. 9 is an exploded view of the device of FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 is a listing of some features of the device of FIG. 8.



FIG. 11 is a collection of performance maps for patient operational decisions.



FIG. 12 is an illustration of a compact parallel eccentric (CPE) rotary actuator which may be utilized in some of the devices disclosed herein.



FIG. 13 is a pancake actuator which may be utilized in some of the devices disclosed herein.



FIG. 14 is a series of illustrations of prior art orthotic/exoskeleton systems based on closed architecture designs.



FIG. 15 is a series of illustrations collection of various prior art special purpose rehabilitation devices.





SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In one aspect, a robotic bed is provided which comprises (a) a bed frame supported on a set of wheels; (b) a mattress supported on said bed frame, said mattress having first and second opposing sides; (c) first and second opposing rails disposed parallel to said first and second opposing sides of said bed; (d) first and second rollers disposed on said first and second rails, respectfully; (e) a sheet which extends between said first and second rollers, said sheet having opposing end portions which are wrapped around said first and second rollers, respectively; and a first set of actuators which rotate said first and second rollers.


In another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element which is rotatably attached to the first structural element across a joint; (c) a first rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a first axis; and (d) a second rotary actuator which imparts rotational motion to the first structural element relative to the second structural element about a second axis; wherein each of said first and second rotary actuators is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and rotary actuators.


In a further aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a joint attached to said first structural element; and (c) a first actuator which rotates said first structural element about an axis centered on said joint; wherein said first actuator is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and star compound actuators.


In still another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; and (c) a first actuator which moves said first structural element relative to said second structural element; wherein said first actuator is selected from the group consisting of parallel eccentric actuators and star compound actuators.


In yet another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; and (c) a first actuator which moves said first structural element relative to said second structural element; wherein said first actuator includes (1) an internal gear, (2) first and second parallel eccentric gears which mesh with said internal gear; (3) a crankshaft equipped with first and second eccentrics which are 180° out-of-phase and which drive said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively, (4) a prime mover which drives said crankshaft, (5) first and second crosslinks which prevent the rotation of said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively, and (6) first and second sets of splines which engage said first and second parallel eccentric gears, respectively.


In still another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint; (c) a link disposed about said joint, said link terminating in a first receptacle on a first end thereof, and terminating in a second receptacle on a second end thereof; (d) first and second actuators disposed in said first and second receptacles, respectively; (e) a first brace terminating in a third receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said first structural element on a second end thereof; and (f) a second brace terminating in a fourth receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said second structural element on a second end thereof; wherein said first actuator is disposed in a container formed by said first and third receptacles, and said second actuator is disposed in a container formed by said second and fourth receptacles.


In another aspect, an orthotic device is provided which comprises (a) a first structural element; (b) a second structural element; (c) a first link attached on a first end thereof to said first structural element, and terminating in a first receptacle on a second end thereof; (d) a second link attached on a first end thereof to said second structural element, and terminating in a second receptacle on a second end thereof; and (e) a first actuator disposed in a container formed by said first and second receptacles.


In still another aspect, a mobile assist platform is provided which comprises (a) a platform including a frame supported on a set of wheels, and a center portion which is rotatable with respect to said frame; (b) a chair attached to said center portion of said platform; (c) a steering column, disposed on said center portion of said platform and adjacent to said chair, which steers at least one of said set of wheels; and (d) a set of guide arms disposed adjacent to said chair; wherein each of said guide arms includes first and second arm segments, and is equipped with at least one rotary actuator which moves said first arm segment relative to said second arm segment.


In yet another aspect, a combination is provided which includes an orthotic device and a pancake actuator which imparts motion to the orthotic device. The pancake actuator comprises (a) a frame and a plate disposed in opposing relation to each other; (b) a stator disposed between said frame and said plate; (c) a rotor disk equipped with a rotor and disposed within said stator such that said rotor is adjacent to said stator; (d) a pinion gear; and (e) first and second star gears disposed between said frame and said plate, wherein each of said first and second star gears meshes with said pinion gear and said frame.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The need spectrum of patients requiring mobility assistance is broad, and is summarized in TABLE 1 below.









TABLE 1





U.S. Human Rehabilitation Needs



















I. COSTS EXPECTED TO RISE (2002)




 11.5% Severely Disabled




  32.5 million




 3.8% Need ADL Assistance




  10.7 million




 Trauma Brain Injury




  5.3 million




II. ASSOCIATED COSTS




 1998 Cost of Nursing Facilities




  $7.85 billion




 2006 Orthopedic Equipment




  $8.8 billion




 Spinal Implants




  38% of Orthopedic Equipment




III. Need for Prosthetics




 1.9 million U.S. Amputees




  Primarily Due to Diabetes




 600 Are From Iraq




  Half Are Arm Amputees




 30,000 Amputees/Civil War




  Burst in Prosthetics Tech




 $900 million Prosthetics Mkt.




  Outside U.S. Supplier




  75% Are Leg Amputees




IV. DARPA PROSTHETICS PROGRAM




 Concentration on Arm




  Up to 24 DOF




  Exceptionally Complex




 $100 Million Effort




  Medical Dev. Team




  One Indus. Team




 Wish To Use Myo-Electronics




  Unproven Technology




  Unlikely To Proceed










The development of a first generation of patient assist devices is summarized in TABLES 2-3 below, and some of the devices and components resulting from this development effort are depicted in FIGS. 1-2. The development of a second generation of patient assist devices is summarized in TABLE 4 below, and some of the devices and components resulting from this development effort are depicted in FIGS. 4-5. TABLE 5 lists some of the features required in rehabilitation technology, while TABLES 6-8 lists some of the goals for an open architecture orthotics system.









TABLE 2





MODULAR ROBOTIC WHEELCHAIR


(MRW) MANIPULATOR DEVELOPMENT



















1. MODERNIZE WHEELCHAIR




 Expand Functionality




  Powered Platform




  Dexterous Manipulator




  Automatic Tool




  Interchange




 Open Architecture




  Plug-and-Play




  High Performance/Low




  Cost




  Certified Components




  Actuators/Controllers




  Wheelchair Specific SFW




2. WHEELCHAIR MATCHES




INDIVIDUAL




 Person Specific Components




 Man-Machine Interface




 Library of Tools




 Operating Systems




 Pre-Planned Motions




3. MINIMUM SET OF COMPONENTS




 Standardization Reduces Cost




  Responsive Supply Chain




  10x Comp. Cost reduction




  5x Comp. Weight Reduction




 Maximum Solution Population




  Increase Actuator Use




  Expands Functionality




  More Supervised Automation




4. DEXTEROUS 8 DOF PLATFORM




 4 Steered/powered Wheels




  Moves Any Direction




  Improved Fault Tolerance




5. DEXTEROUS 6 DOF MANIPULATOR




 Duplicates Arm Function




  Eating/Handling




 Use Commercial if Possible

















TABLE 3





MODULAR ROBOTIC PLATFORM


(MRW) & MANIPULATOR DEVELOPMENT


(First Generation Open Architecture Assist System)



















1. MODERNIZE ASSIST




SYSTEM




 Expand Functionality




  Powered Platform




  Dexterous Manipulator




  Automatic Tool




  Interchange




 Open Architecture




  Plug-and-Play




  High Performance/Low




  Cost




  Certified Components




  Actuators/Controllers




  Wheelchair Specific SFW




2. MAP MATCHES INDIVIDUAL




 Person Specific Components




 Man-Machine Interface




 Library of Tools




 Operating Systems




 Pre-Planned Motions




3. MINIMUM SET OF COMPONENTS




 Standardization Reduces Cost




  Responsive Supply Chain




  10x Comp. Cost reduction




  5x Comp. Weight Reduction




 Maximum Solution Population




  Increase Actuator Use




  Expands Functionality




  More Supervised Automation




4. DEXTEROUS 8 DOF PLATFORM




 4 Steered/powered Wheels




  Moves Any Direction




  Improved Fault Tolerance




5. DEXTEROUS 6 DOF MANIPULATOR




 Duplicates Arm Function




  Eating/Handling




 Use Commercial if Possible

















TABLE 4





ROBOTIC MULTI-FUNCTION


WHEELCHAIR (MFW)


(Second Generation Wheelchair/


High Function Density)



















1. EXPANDED FUNCTIONS




 Dexterous Mobility




  Seated/Standing




  ±180° Turning




 Orthotics




  Leg/Arm Rehab




  Complex Handling




2. MFW CAPABILITY




 Four 2 DOF Wheels




  Translation/Rotation




  Extend Front Wheels (18″)




  Platform Stability




 Platform Trunion




  Rotates Occupant




  Seated or Standing




  Provides Shoe Sockets




 Platform Seat




  Latches to Trunion




  Pivots About Center




  Support Roller on Platform




 Lifting Guide Arms




  Two Parallel Arms




  2 or 3 Actuators




  Pancake Star Compounds




  Lifts/Controls Torso




  Attached To Trunion




  Quick-Change Attachments




 Orthotic Arm Support




  Attaches to Upper Torso




  3 up to 7 DOF




  Complex Handling Motions




  Rehabs Weakened Arm

















TABLE 5





REQUIRED REHABILITATION TECHNOLOGY



















I. OPEN ARCH. EXOSKELETON




 Strengthen Weakened Patient




  Brain/Muscle Coordination




 Full Population of Disabled




  Arms, Legs, Torso, Etc.




 Target Is ADL




  Reduce Clinical Time




  Maximize Availability




  Reduce Cost




  Improve Reliability




II. PLUG-AND-PLAY SYSTEM




 Standardized Components




  Actuators, Links




  Controllers, Sensors




  Multiple Suppliers




 Customized Body




 Attachments




  Use Laser Sintering




 Assemble On Demand




  By Clinician




  Repair By Patient




III. MERGING OF PROSTHETICS/




ORTHOTICS




 Responsive To Human Command




  Safety/Backdrivability




  Required for ADL




 Standardized Actuators




  Low Weight/High Torque




  Perhaps 5 Required




  Drives Down Cost




 Meet Each Patient's Needs




  Analysis By Clinician




  Wireless In ADL




  Real Time Performance Feedback




IV. SENSOR-BASED




UNDERGARMENTS




 Torso Undergarment




  Arm Prostheses




  Six Coordinate Signals Feasible




 Pelvic Undergarment




  Leg Prostheses




 Natural Signal Generation




  Reliable/Bilateral




  Under Patient's Control




  Temp., Pressure, Tension, Torsion

















TABLE 6







GOALS FOR OPEN ARCHITECTURE ORTHOTICS (part 1)









Development
Technical



Task
Issues
Goals





1. Intelligent
High Torque, Low Volume,
Knee/Hip/Ankle Peak


Actuators
Low Weight, Low Noise
Torque 200 ft-lb. in



Fits Under Normal Clothing
2.5″ W. × 3.5″ Dia.


2. Durability
Equivalent to Car, Low Cost,
5000-hour Life Reduce



No Backlash, Predict Failure,
Cost by 5x



Maintainable by Caregiver



3. Minimum Sets
Plug-and-Play Interfaces,
5 Actuator Size,



All Components, Link
3 Actuator Classes,



Composites, Continuous
Quick-Changeout,



Performance/Cost
Low Weight



Improvement



4. Responsiveness
Almost No Gear Train
Similar to BLDC



Inertia, Exceptional Stiffness,
Without Gearing



Low Lost Motion, Precision




Control
















TABLE 7







GOALS FOR OPEN ARCHITECTURE ORTHOTICS (part 2)









Development Task
Technical Issues
Goals





High Efficiency
Embedded Performance
40 Embedded Maps,



Maps, Operate Near sweet
Efficiency Up 4x,



Spots, 10 Internal sensors,
Temperature Mgnt.



Real-Time Efficiency




Mgmt.



Distributed Body
On-Link Structures, Body
Up to 25 Operational


Sensors
Sockets, Undergarments,
regimes, Selected By



Monitor Body Functions
Patient On Command


Operational Criteria
Patient Duty Cycles,
Develop 30 to 50 Criteria,



Archive Operational data,
Patient learning Regimes



Choose/Rank All criteria
















TABLE 8







GOALS FOR OPEN ARCHITECTURE ORTHOTICS (part 3)









Development Task
Technical Issues
Goals





Operational
Use OSCAR Language,
Full Model Parameters, 5


Software
Software Evolves, Object-
Milli/Second



Oriented Structure
Computational Cycle


Configuration
Assists Clinician To
Duty Cycle Measures,


Manager
Assemble Best Patient
Continuous Updates,



Orthotic System,
Visually Confirm With



Continuous Management
Performance Maps



to Revise Configuration



Home Rehab. &
Move Patient Quickly Out
Cost-Effective


Activities pf Daily
of Clinic, Reduce Cost,
Components/System


Living (ADL)
Telepresence With Clinic,
Technology, Patient



Enable Quick Repair
Independent of Clinic









A system architecture for a patient assist device is preferably responsive and reconfigurable to match as many real physical motion needs as possible, and to permit response to changes in those needs. This may require an open architecture which preferably involves low cost actuators and operating software (OS). The low cost actuators utilized in such an architecture are preferably standardized, plug-and-play, and highly-certified in a minimum set for mass production for all feasible systems. The operating software is preferably an open software architecture that permits constant up-dates to control a very large range of systems from 3 up to 20 DOF under human command.


Fortunately, a suitable OS system is widely available in the form of the OSCAR (Operating Software Components for Advanced Robotics) operating system developed at the University of Texas, and the ROS (Robot Operating System) operating system developed by the Southwestern Research Institute (SwRI) in San Antonio, Tex. These operating systems require specialization for the assist operating environment. The actuator, however, is well understood from a design environment, but should be prototyped, tested, certified, and detailed to enable mass production at the lowest possible cost. Given the OS and the minimum set of actuators (say, 5 to 10), it then becomes possible for nominally-trained personnel to meet each assist need (with a configuration manager) and to enable the caregiver to maintain the system to provide maximum availability.


Systems are disclosed herein which are plug-and-play systems that utilize a minimum set of highly-certified, low cost actuators matched by a similar selection of operational software components. Preferred embodiments of these systems are based on the components in TABLE 9 below:









TABLE 9







System Components










Component
Description







MediGlider
Drive with four 2 DOF corner actuator modules,




automated motion plan, automated patient bed




pick-up and return, provide for full hospital




integration.



Roll-Bed
Provide a bed-oriented patient roll module to




automate patient commanded roll in either




direction, keeping patient centered on mattress.



Glider 1
Very simple domestic motion platform for the




incapacitated young with complete motion




command by the patient.



Glider 2
Generalized domestic/workplace motion platform




under adult patient command with carrying




capacity from 200, 250, 300 lb. total.



Glider 3
Augment Glider 2 to permit total life capability




of nine functions in structured environments from




morning to night.



Orthotics
Produce the Ekso Bionics and Suitx Phoenix leg




orthosis to expand to full body orthotics.











FIG. 3 depicts a particular, non-limiting embodiment of a mobile assist platform (MAP) in accordance with the teachings herein, and TABLE 10 lists some features of the associated MAP-based operations. The MAP 501 depicted in FIG. 3 includes a seat 503 mounted on a rotatatable trunnion 505. The MAP 501 is equipped with wheels 507 which are preferably powered by star compound gears, and which preferably offer 2 degree of freedom (DOF) dexterous operation. Preferably, these wheels 507 may be independently controlled by the operator (preferably through suitable software) to provide movement in any direction. The wheels 507 are preferably rotatable over a wide angular range to impart movement in any desired direction. The rotating trunnion 505 is preferably manipulated by a tension belt powered by a star compound gear train.


The particular embodiment of the MAP 501 depicted further comprises an extensible hand pedestal 511, a guide arm attachment 513, a foot socket 515, a hand grip pedestal 517, a bayonet lock 519, a folding arms and seat combination 521 which is configured to clear the hand grip pedestal 517, a seat pedestal 523, and a seat support roller 525. Though not shown, the depicted embodiment of the MAP 501 further comprises one or more batteries and controller circuitry.









TABLE 10





PATIENT PERFORMANCE MAP-BASED OPERATIONS


(Based On real Time Sensor Array Data Acquisition)



















I. OVERALL OBJECTIVE




 Maximize Human Performance




  Wide Range of Operations




  Using Intelligent Systems




 Revolutionize Man/Machine




  Automated Mutual awareness




  Enhance Short-Term Actions




  Strengthen Mission Planning




 Improve Resource Utilization




  Full Access to Available




  Resources




  Fully Documented




  Operators/Equip.




  Under Ever-Changing Threats




II. CONCENTRATE ON THE PATIENT




 Identify 10 Patient Measures




  Endurance, Responsiveness,




  etc.




 Select 10 Patient Parameters




  Stress, Fatigue, Etc.




 Evaluate 10 Uniform Bio




 Markers




  Heartbeat, Brain EEG, Etc.




 Establish 10 System




 Measures




  Patient/System, Common




  Database




III. MAP/ENVELOPE CONSTRUCTION




 Patient/System Maps




  Two Parameters for Each Measure




  100(+) Patient Maps




  100(+) System Maps




 Patient/System Envelopes




  Combination of Maps




  Stress/Sleep/Food Envelope




  100's of Standard Envelopes




  Envelopes on Demand




 Similar Equipment Maps/Envelopes




IV. MAP/ENVELOPE UTILIZATION




 Mesh Patient/Equipment Maps




  Automated Matching




  Maximizes Overall Performance




 Improves Patient Awareness




  Patient Awareness




  Rapid Operator Replacements




 Improves Clinician Interface




  Clinician resource Awareness (±)




  Automated Treatment Planning











FIG. 11 depicts two particular, non-limiting examples of performance maps (here, for patient operational decisions) of the type that may be developed for a particular person. Such performs maps depict the intelligence of the decision making which may be built into the devices and systems described herein to compensate for the physical infirmities of the patient. The leftmost performance map depicted in FIG. 11 depicts sleep reservoir performance use in the form of reservoir depletion as a function of duty cycle (time awake/24 hours) and mission duration (in hours). The rightmost performance map depicted in FIG. 11 depicts remaining physical endurance in the form of remaining endurance (in minutes) as a function of heart rate (in bpm) and skin temperature (in ° C.).



FIG. 12 depicts a first particular, non-limiting embodiment of a compact parallel eccentric (CPE) rotary actuator which may be utilized in the devices disclosed herein. Further details of this actuator may be found in U.S. Ser. No. 14/869,994 (Tesar), entitled “Compact Parallel Eccentric Rotary Actuator”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Some of the features and advantages of the CPE are summarized in TABLE 11 below.









TABLE 11





ORTHOTIC ACTUATOR BASED ON CPE


(High Torque Density/Clutched Cyclic Spring Energy)



















ACTUATOR INTELLIGENCE




 Voice Commands




  Stand/Walk/Climb




  Exercise/Relax




  Be Efficient/Quiet




 Operational Software




  Embedded Performance




  Maps




  Multiple Sensors




  Failure Prediction




NEED FOR ORTHOTIC ACTUATOR




 10 Million Physically Disabled




  Activities of Dailey Living (ADL)




  Enable Work Force Participation




  Self-Sufficiency




 Tech noloqy Required




  100 ft-lb. Continuous




  200 ft-lb. Peak




  High Efficiency/Durability




 Similar Equipment Maps/Envelopes




EXCEPTIONAL TECHNOLOGY




 Hiqh Torque Density




  Less Than 5 lb.




  High Stiffness




  Very Compact




 Growth Potential




  Low Noise




  Cost Effective




  Efficient










With reference to FIG. 12, the particular CPE rotary actuator 101 depicted therein comprises a crankshaft 103 equipped with first and second eccentrics 107. A rotor 109 is rotatably mounted on the crankshaft 103 and is separated therefrom by way of a rotor spacer 111. A stator 113 is rigidly supported on a pair of internal stator support plates 115 in closely spaced-apart relation to the rotor 109.


The CPE rotary actuator 101 is further equipped with first and second crosslinks 117 and with first and second eccentric gears 121. Each eccentric gear 121 is disposed between a crosslink 117 and one of first and second output plates 123 (also referred to herein as output gears).


As seen in FIG. 12, each crosslink 117 has a gap 125 adjacent thereto, and engages adjacent surfaces of the corresponding eccentric gear 121 and the internal stator support plate 115 across a tongue and groove surface 119. The CPE rotary actuator 101 is further equipped with a reference link 127, an output link 129, attachment lugs 131, principal bearings 133, shaft bearings 135, an internal gear 137, and a rotor spacer 139.


The CPE rotary actuator 101 of FIG. 12 leverages the structural integrity of the (preferably circular) stator 113 of the prime mover to effectively resist forces/moments in all directions. In particular, the rigidity of the stator 113 is enhanced by the addition of the two internal stator support plates 115, which are bolted to the sides of the stator 113 with small attachment wedges 145 to create a solid mating structure.


As noted above, in human assist and rehabilitation, there is a primary need for a very thin actuator capable of reasonable torque and high out-of-plane force/moments. To be useful, such an actuator must also be plug-and-play with quick-change interfaces (for rapid repair) and low cost by means of mass production.


The lowest cost actuators may ultimately be the most economically important. Low cost typically dictates the use of standard gear and bearing manufacture. Nonetheless, the standard epicyclic gear train is not preferable for many human assist and rehabilitation applications because it contains too many bearings, a rotating high inertia gear cage, and an excess of structure to maintain the gear alignments under high load or inertia forces.


Despite the foregoing, the epicyclic gear train also has some useful features. In particular, it has concentricity about a central axis, and utilizes mutually supportive planet gears which mesh with central sun gears. This concentricity keeps all forces balanced about the central axis, minimizes or eliminates out-of-plane moments, and imparts low force/moments on the gear train shell structure. Also, the moving cage structure enables the planets to mesh with a stationary internal gear in the actuator shell. With care, this arrangement enables reductions of 40 up to 60-to-1 in a two-plane configuration.


Drawbacks of the epicyclic gear train include its high cage inertia, the excess of bearings, and the centrifugal forces of the planets on their bearings, all of which lead to higher deformations, more noise, more wear, and more backlash. To address these issues, it is preferred that all planet bearings be fixed (stationary) in strong/rugged cross plates (or what may be called strong back walls) which join to the outer cylindrical shell to the central gear axis to form a rugged and shock resistant structure. All bearings are preferably low velocity bearings except for the critical input pinion, which is usually driven by a high-speed prime mover. The star compound, therefore, has star gears, not planet gears. These star gears have fixed axes and can have one or two planes. Given two planes enables the use of a clutch in between to change the reduction ratios (as in two-speed drive wheels on vehicles). The star gear axes can then be extended through a strong back wall to a third plane of star gears to drive an internal output gear which provides a further reduction of about 6-to-1.


Altogether, this 3-plane star gear may provide reductions of 40 up to 60-to-1 in a very compact package. The last “internal” gear is the output usually supported by a very stiff/compact large diameter/small cross-section bearing. This bearing may be a ball bearing, a cross-roller bearing, or a grooved roller bearing, progressively with higher load capacity in a lower volume. All of these features make the star compound superior to the epicyclic gear train.



FIG. 13 depicts a particular, non-limiting embodiment of a rotary actuator based on star compound gear principles which may be utilized in some of the devices and methodologies disclosed herein, and which is implemented in a very thin pancake configuration. The actuator 201 includes a top plate 203, a stator 205, a rotor 207, a stationary frame 209, a rotor disk 211, and an output plate 213. The actuator 201 further includes first 215 and second 217 star gears, a principal bearing 219, a seal 221, a pinion gear 223, a power wire 225 and a wire channel 227 for the power wire 225.


The gear train of the rotary actuator 201 includes an electric prime mover, which is preferably a brushless DC electric motor (BLDC). The BLDC is disposed in the same shell to create a fully integrated actuator. The stator 205 becomes the rugged outer structure of the actuator 201 joining the two strong back walls (the top plate 203 and the stationary frame 209) which holds the principal bearings 219.


The large diameter rotor 207 is inside the stator 205 with a rotor disk 211 supported by two central axis bearings. Preferably, this rotor 207 produces a high torque at relatively low speeds (such as, for example, 700 RPM). The rotor disk 211 is connected directly to the pinion gear 223 (r1) with an axis supported by a bearing in the top plate 203 and the stationary frame 209. The pinion gear 223 (r1) drives the fixed star gears 215 (r2) (preferably 3) which are concentric with the central axis of the actuator 201. The fixed star gears 215 are supported by bearings in the stationary frame 209 which is connected to the stator shell.


Each star gear axis contains first 215 and second 217 star gears (r2, r3) rigidly connected to each other. First 215 and second 217 star gears (r1, r2) are in plane 1 of the star compound gear train, while star gear 217 (r3) and internal stationary gear 231 (r4), which is a rigid part of the output plate 213, are in plane 2 of the star compound gear train. Star gear 217 (r3) then drives internal stationary gear 231 (r4). The internal stationary gear (r4) is supported by principal bearing 219, which is preferably a large diameter, small cross-section (and preferably low cost) ball bearing. The principal bearing 219 is preferably capable of carrying 3x (or more) thrust load than radial load, since all balls (there are many) simultaneously work to carry the thrust load.


To work in a quiet environment (almost no noise), it is preferred that the first star gears 215 (r2) are high quality plastic nylon gears. The top plate preferably plugs into the supporting structure (of the mobile platform) with a quick-change interface (both mechanically and electrically). The power and communication wiring extends through a wire channel 227 in the top plate 203 to the stator 205 (and related sensors), and also through the central axis to support the next actuator (i.e., by means of wire channel 227).


An issue of cost may arise in the unique nature of the principal bearing. Otherwise, very low cost BLDC's, controllers, sensors, star gears, supporting bearings should be mass produced to create a minimum set of this pancake actuator to populate a large population of assist/rehabilitation systems (mobile platforms, lifting arms, robot gurneys, orthotics, etc.). The goal is to maximize performance while reducing cost, making quick assembly possible by the clinician and rapid repair by the individual or caregiver.


To reduce costs, the actuator of FIG. 13 will preferably be produced in a minimum set featuring a number of predetermined sizes (say, 3″, 4″ and 5″ diameters) for various end uses. The aspect ratio (diameter: thickness or height) is preferably within the range of about 6.5 to about 8.5, more preferably in the range of about 7 to about 8, and most preferably within the range of about 7.5 to about 7.8.


It is notable that the actuators of FIG. 12-13 are capable of providing torque densities at the levels required for human assist and rehabilitation. By contrast, many of the prior art devices depicted in FIGS. 14-15 suffer from low torque densities, which limits their usefulness.


The above description of the present invention is illustrative, and is not intended to be limiting. It will thus be appreciated that various additions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be construed in reference to the appended claims. It will also be appreciated that the various features set forth in the claims may be presented in various combinations and sub-combinations in future claims without departing from the scope of the invention. In particular, the present disclosure expressly contemplates any such combination or sub-combination that is not known to the prior art, as if such combinations or sub-combinations were expressly written out.

Claims
  • 1. An orthotic device, comprising: a first structural element;a second structural element attached to said first structural element by way of a joint;a link disposed about said joint, said link terminating in a first receptacle on a first end thereof, and terminating in a second receptacle on a second end thereof;first and second actuators disposed in said first and second receptacles, respectively;a first brace terminating in a third receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said first structural element on a second end thereof; anda second brace terminating in a fourth receptacle on a first end thereof, and attached to said second structural element on a second end thereof;wherein said first actuator is disposed in a first container formed by said first and third receptacles, and said second actuator is disposed in a second container formed by said second and fourth receptacles.
  • 2. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said first and second actuators are rotary actuators.
  • 3. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said first and second actuators are parallel eccentric actuators.
  • 4. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said first and second actuators are compact parallel eccentric actuators.
  • 5. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein each of said first and second rotary actuators is a pancake actuator.
  • 6. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein each of said first and second rotary actuators is a star compound actuator.
  • 7. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said first structural element is configured to attach to a human forearm.
  • 8. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said first actuator comprises: a frame and a plate disposed in opposing relation to each other; a stator disposed between said frame and said plate; a rotor disk equipped with a rotor and disposed within said stator such that said rotor is adjacent to said stator; a pinion gear; and first and second star gears disposed between said frame and said plate, wherein each of said first and second star gears meshes with said pinion gear and said frame.
  • 9. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said actuator moves said first structural element relative to said second structural element.
  • 10. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein each of said first and second star gears contains a plurality of gears rigidly connected to each other.
  • 11. The orthotic device of claim 1, wherein said plate forms a first exterior surface of said actuator, wherein said stator forms at least a portion of a second exterior surface of said actuator which is perpendicular to said first surface, and wherein said second major surface has a larger diameter than said first major surface.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. provisional application No. 62/430,916, filed Dec. 6, 2016, having the same inventor and the same title, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (99)
Number Name Date Kind
381395 Love Apr 1888 A
1973185 Treojevich Sep 1934 A
2140012 Hayes Dec 1938 A
2195783 Ravigneaux Apr 1940 A
2231784 Von Thungen Feb 1941 A
2241764 Bollinger et al. May 1941 A
2311006 Trbojevich Feb 1943 A
2320757 Sinclair et al. Jun 1943 A
2534134 Kirkpatrick Dec 1950 A
2627190 Böttcher Feb 1953 A
2703021 Stoeckicht Mar 1955 A
2844052 Stoeckicht Jul 1958 A
2861465 Winkle et al. Nov 1958 A
3064491 Bishop Nov 1962 A
3095757 Thoma Jul 1963 A
3150532 Bixby Sep 1964 A
3251236 Wildhaber May 1966 A
3396632 Leblanc Aug 1968 A
3397589 Moore Aug 1968 A
3563354 Sigg Feb 1971 A
3719841 Ritsema Mar 1973 A
3742568 Hahlbeck Jul 1973 A
3772932 Nagano Nov 1973 A
3813821 Takahashi Jun 1974 A
3823620 Bricout Jul 1974 A
3888134 Miranda Jun 1975 A
3901092 Romick Aug 1975 A
3907470 Harle et al. Sep 1975 A
3941013 Miller Mar 1976 A
4024959 Gruner May 1977 A
4158967 Vatterott Jun 1979 A
4186626 Chamberelain Feb 1980 A
4237741 Huf et al. Dec 1980 A
4280583 Stieg Jul 1981 A
4297918 Perry Nov 1981 A
4378660 Weiner Apr 1983 A
4381828 Lunn et al. May 1983 A
4407382 Ddziuba et al. Oct 1983 A
4416345 Barthelemy Nov 1983 A
4417642 Suzuki et al. Nov 1983 A
4461375 Brown Jul 1984 A
4462271 Stieg Jul 1984 A
4467568 Bloch et al. Aug 1984 A
4505166 Tesar Mar 1985 A
4540073 Rogier Sep 1985 A
4547107 Krause Oct 1985 A
4554842 Wood, III Nov 1985 A
4560056 Stockton Dec 1985 A
4569252 Harper Feb 1986 A
4583413 Lack Apr 1986 A
4624154 Kraft et al. Nov 1986 A
4706512 McKernon et al. Nov 1987 A
4721013 Stuer et al. Jan 1988 A
4817773 Knodel et al. Apr 1989 A
5355743 Tesar Oct 1994 A
5880964 Schall Mar 1999 A
5908372 Janek Jun 1999 A
6791215 Tesar Sep 2004 B2
7081062 Tesar Jul 2006 B2
7122926 Tesar Oct 2006 B2
7431676 Tesar Oct 2008 B2
7604559 Fujimoto et al. Oct 2009 B2
7722494 Tesar May 2010 B2
8033942 Tesar Oct 2011 B2
8403789 Janek Mar 2013 B2
8516918 Jacobsen Aug 2013 B2
9956093 Harris May 2018 B1
20040007923 Tesar Jan 2004 A1
20040102274 Tesar May 2004 A1
20040103742 Tesar Jun 2004 A1
20050168084 Tesar Aug 2005 A1
20070168081 Shin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070249457 Tesar Oct 2007 A1
20080257088 Tesar Oct 2008 A1
20080269922 Tesar Oct 2008 A1
20090075771 Tesar Mar 2009 A1
20120088622 Tesar Apr 2012 A1
20120204671 Tesar Aug 2012 A1
20120215450 Ashok et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130023373 Janek Jan 2013 A1
20130217530 Tesar Aug 2013 A1
20140224064 Tesar Aug 2014 A1
20140228162 Tesar Aug 2014 A1
20140246893 Tesar Sep 2014 A1
20150102655 Tesar Apr 2015 A1
20150292601 Tesar Oct 2015 A1
20150330455 Tesar Nov 2015 A1
20150351938 Moser et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150354667 Tesar Dec 2015 A1
20150374573 Horst Dec 2015 A1
20160030202 Nishikawa Feb 2016 A1
20160030272 Angold Feb 2016 A1
20160067058 Herr Mar 2016 A1
20160074182 Celebi Mar 2016 A1
20160091054 Tesar Mar 2016 A1
20160095720 Behzadi Apr 2016 A1
20160113831 Hollander Apr 2016 A1
20160137051 Tesar May 2016 A1
20160138679 Tesar May 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2006125282 Nov 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Bram Vanderborght, Nikos G. Tsagarakis, Claudio Semini, Ronald Van Ham, Darwin G. Caldwell, “MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable Compliant Actuator with Stiffening Characteristic for Energy Efficient Hopping”, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Kobe International Conference Center, Kobe, Japan, May 12-17, 2009).
T. Ménard, G. Grioli and A. Bicchi, “A real time robust observer for an Agonist-Antagonist Variable Stiffness Actuator”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference (Karlsruhe, May 6-10, 2013).
Giorgio Carpino, Dino Accoto, Fabrizio Sergi, Nevio Luigi Tagliamonte and Eugenio Guglielmelli, “A Novel Compact Torsional Spring for Series Elastic Actuators for Assistive Wearable Robots”, J. Mech. Des 134(12), 121002 (Oct. 19, 2012).
Matteo Laffranchi, Hide Sumioka, Alexander Sproewitz, Dongming Gan, Nikos G. Tsagarakis, “Compliant Actuators, Adaptive Modular Architectures for Rich Motor Skills (AMARSi)”, ICT-248311 D2.1 (Mar. 2011).
Gill A. Pratt and Matthew M. Williamson, “Series Elastic Actuators”, IEEE, 399-406 (1995).
Matthew M. Williamson, “Series Elastic Actuators”, Masters Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Feb. 1995).
Micromotion, Product Catalog, “Precision Microactuators”, downloaded Jan. 16, 2015 from http://www.orlin.co.uk/PDFs/Micromotion_product_brochure.pdf.
Schaeffler KG, Linear technology Division, “Miniature Linear Actuator with Toothed Belt Drive”, Series MLFI20-ZR (Jan. 2006).
Nicholas Paine, “Design and Control Considerations for High-Performance Series Elastic Actuators”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1-11 (2013).
D.F.B. Haeufle, M.D. Taylor, S. Schmitt, H. Geyer, “A clutched parallel elastic actuator concept:towards energy efficient powered legs in prosthetics and robotics”, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (Rome, Jun. 24-27, 2012).
Markus Baeuml, Florian Dobre, Harald Hochmuth, Manfred Kraus, Hartmut Krehmer, Roland Langer, Dominik Reif, “The Chassis of the Future”, The Schaeffler Symposium Book (Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG, 2014).
Fabrizio Sergi, Melissa M. Lee, and Marcia K. O'Malley, “Design of a series elastic actuator for a compliant parallel wrist rehabilitation robot”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics , pp. 1-6 (Seattle, WA, Jun. 24-26, 2013).
Sidharth Iyer, “Modeling and Testing of a Series Elastic Actuator with Controllable Damping”, Master's Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (Jan. 2012).
Agostino De Santis, Bruno Siciliano, Alessandro De Luca, Antonio Bicchi, “An atlas of physical human-robot interaction”, Mech. Mach. Theory (2007).
Michael David Taylor, “A Compact Series Elastic Actuator for Bipedal Robots with Human-Like Dynamic Performance”, Master's Thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (Aug. 2011).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180153757 A1 Jun 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62430916 Dec 2016 US