The present disclosure relates to minimally invasive and catheter delivered revascularization systems for use in the vasculature, especially those suited for usage above the juncture of the Subclavian Artery and Common Carotid Artery. In particular, this disclosure relates to revascularization devices for use in treatment of ischemic stroke, including improved neurological medical devices which are tethered or reconstrainable self-expanding neurological medical devices.
According to embodiments of the present invention, there are disclosed acute stroke revascularization/recanalization systems comprising, in combination; catheter systems having guidewires to access and emplace improved neurological medical devices into the cerebral vasculature, the systems including proximal stainless steel pushers with distal nitinol devices or one-piece nitinol devices. In some embodiments, the systems comprise a polymeric liner incorporated within the pusher to improve trackability of the guidewire. In some embodiments, the polymeric liner extends beyond the distal tip of the pusher for guiding the guidewire and preventing entanglement in the nitinol device.
According to embodiments, there are disclosed one-piece nitinol devices in combination with the above disclosed and/or claimed catheter systems.
Briefly stated, according to embodiments a novel enhanced tethered revascularization device is deliverable through highly constricted and tortuous vessels, entering a zone associated with subject thrombi/emboli, where deployment impacts the embolus, compacting the same into luminal walls which enables perfusion and lysis of the embolus, while the revascularization device itself remains continuous with the delivery system acting as a filter, basket or stand alone revascularization mechanism, depending on the status of the embolus and other therapeutic aspects of the treatment being offered for consideration.
According to embodiments of the system and processes of the present invention, in certain iterations, once deployed the instant system compacts the embolus against the luminal wall, creating a channel for blood flow which may act like a natural lytic agent to lyse or dissolve the embolus.
According to embodiments, there is provided an improved neurological medical device which comprises, in combination, a catheter system effective for delivering a combination radial filter/revascularization device and basket assembly into a desired location in the cerebral vascular system, a self-expanding radial filter/revascularization device and basket assembly detachably tethered to the catheter system which functions in at least three respective modes, wherein the radial filter/revascularization device and basket assembly is attached to the catheter and wherein radial filter/revascularization device and basket assembly further comprises at least two states per mode, a retracted state and an expanded state; and wherein the radial filter/revascularization device and basket assembly may retracted into the retracted state after deployment in an expanded state, in each mode.
According to embodiments, there is provided a process comprising in combination providing a revascularization device tethered to a catheter by emplacing the system into a patient for travel to a desired location in a vessel having an obstruction/lesion and deploying the revascularization device by allowing it to move from a first state to a second state across a lesion which compresses the subject embolus into a luminal wall to which it is adjacent whereby creating a channel for blood flow as a lytic agent, and removing the system which the obstruction/lesion is addressed.
It is noted that if blood flow does not lyse the blood embolus, lytic agents can be administered via the guidewire lumen, as a feature of the present invention.
According to embodiments, there is provided a process whereby the revascularization device tethered to a catheter functions as a radial filter to prevent downstream migration of emboli.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has previously approved a clot retrieval device (The Merci® brand of retriever X4, X5, X6, L4, L5 & L6: Concentric Medical, Mountain View, Calif.). Unfortunately, when used alone, this clot retriever is successful in restoring blood flow in only approximately 50% of the cases, and multiple passes with this device are often required to achieve successful recanalization. IA thrombolytics administered concomitantly enhance the procedural success of this device but may increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the revascularization infarction. There have been several reports of coronary and neuro-stent implantation used for mechanical thrombolysis of recalcitrant occlusions. In summary, stent placement with balloon-mounted or self-expanding coronary and neuro-types of stents has been shown to be an independent predictor for recanalization of both intracranial and extra cranial cerebro-vasculature occlusions. This provides some insight into approaches needed to overcome these longstanding issues.
By way of example, self-expanding stents designed specifically for the cerebro-vasculature can be delivered to target areas of intracranial stenosis with a success rate of >95% and an increased safety profile of deliverability because these stents are deployed at significantly lower pressures than balloon-mounted coronary stents. However, systems using this data have yet to become commercial, available or accepted by most practitioners.
The use of self-expanding stents is feasible in the setting of symptomatic medium—and large-vessel intracranial occlusions. With stent placement as a first-line mechanical treatment or as a “last-resort” maneuver, TIMI/TICI 2 or 3 revascularization can be successfully obtained, according to clinical data now available.
The literature likewise suggests that focal occlusions limited to a single medium or large vessel, particularly solitary occlusions of the MCA or VBA, may be preferentially amenable to stent placement and thus can help clinicians to achieve improved rates of recanalization. In addition, gender may play a role in the success of self-expanding stent implementation. However, systems need to be designed to execute on this.
Despite increasing utilization of prourokinase rt-PA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) or other antithrombotic agents (e.g., Alteplase® and Reteplase®), recanalization rates remain approximately 60%. The major concerns with pharmacologic thrombolysis (alone) has been the rate of hemorrhage, inability to effectively dissolve fibrin\platelet-rich clots, lengthy times to recanalization, and inability to prevent abrupt reocclusions at the initial site of obstruction. In PROACTII, ICH with neurologic deterioration within 24 hours occurred in 10.9% of the prourokinase group and 3.1% of the control group (P=0.06), without differences in mortality. Abrupt reocclusions or recanalized arteries has been found to occur relatively frequently, even with the addition of angioplasty or snare manipulation for mechanical disruption of thrombus, and seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes.
The use of other mechanical means has been reported to be effective in recanalization of acute occlusions. It makes sense that a combination of mechanical and pharmacologic approaches would yield greater benefit.
A known investigation in an animal model has shown, both the Wingspan® brand of self-expanding stent and Liberte® brand of balloon-mounted stent (Boston Scientific, Boston, Mass.) were able to re-establish flow through acutely occluded vessels. The self-expanding stents performed better than the balloon-mounted stents in terms of navigability to the target site. The self-expanding stents incurred lower rates of vasospasm and side-branch occlusions, which suggests superiority of these stents, over balloon-mounted stents, to maintain branch vessel patency during treatment of acute vessel occlusion. In previous animal studies conducted, intimal proliferation and loss of lumen diameter were seen after the implantation of bare-metal, balloon-expandable stents. The literature further supports this set of issues.
These phenomena are believed to be attributable to intimal injury created during the high-pressure balloon angioplasty that is required for stent deployment.
Compared with coronary balloon-mounted stents, self-expanding stents designed for use in the intracranial circulation are superior because they are easier to track to the intracranial circulation and safer to deploy in vessels in which the true diameter and degree of intracranial atherosclerotic disease are unclear.
Moreover, based on previous experience, currently available self-expanding stents provide enough radial outward force at body temperature to revascularize occluded vessels, with low potential for the negative remodeling and in-stent restenosis that are associated with balloon-mounted stents in nonintracranial vascular beds.
Because self-expanding stents are not mounted on balloons, they are the most trackable of the stents currently available for the intracranial circulation. Unlike clot retrievers, which lose access to the target (occlusion site) every time they are retrieved (and often to necessitate multiple passes), self-expanding stents allow for wire access to the occlusion at all times, increasing the safety profile of the procedure by not requiring repeat maneuvers to gain access to the target site (as in the case for the Merci® brand of clot retriever).
Self-expanding stent placement of acute intracranial vessel occlusions may provide a novel means of recanalization after failure of clot retrieval, angioplasty, and/or thrombolytic therapy. The patency rates in this series are encouraging, yet issues remain to be addressed.
In the setting of acute stroke, restoring flow is of singular importance. In-stent stenosis or delayed stenosis may be treated in a delayed fashion on an elective basis, should the patient achieve a functional recovery from the stroke.
Recanalization with self-expanding stents may provide flow through the patent artery, and restore flow to the perforators, or, alternatively, they may remain occluded. Restoring flow to the main artery, however, will reduce the stroke burden. What is needed is a solution leveraging positive aspects of stent-based treatment without the negative outcomes which have been associated with traditional stenting.
The above-mentioned features and objects of the present disclosure will become more apparent with reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and in which:
The present inventors have realized that by leveraging a conventional self-expanding revascularization device delivery platform, a poly-modic system can be iterated which impacts, addresses and/or crosses an embolus, radially filters, and either removes the offending embolus or is optionally emplaced to address the same. A paucity of extant systems effective for such combination therapies is noted among the art.
Using endovascular techniques self-expandable tethered or reconstrainable self-expanding neurological medical devices offer instant revascularization/recanalization of MCAs and related vessels, without any of the traditional concerns associated with stenting, according to embodiments of the present invention.
Expressly incorporated herein by reference are the following U.S. Letters patents and publications, each as if fully set forth herein: 2005/0119684; 2007/0198028; 2007/0208367; U.S. Pat. No. 5,449,372; U.S. Pat. No. 5,485,450; U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,157; U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,260; U.S. Pat. No. 5,972,019; U.S. Pat. No. 6,485,500; U.S. Pat. No. 7,147,655; U.S. Pat. No. 7,160,317; U.S. Pat. No. 7,172,575; U.S. Pat. No. 7,175,607; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,201,770.
The instant system allows for natural lysis, revascularization of the challenged vessels, and importantly radially filters any particulates generated, to obviate the need to be concerned with distal migration of the same, unlike prior systems or applications which include largely “off-label” usages of devices approved only for aneurysms in the brain.
The present disclosure relates to revascularization devices (e.g., reperfusion devices) used to treat, among other things, ischemic stroke. Naturally, therefore, the revascularization devices of the present disclosure are designed to be used in neuro-type applications, wherein the specifications of the present catheters and revascularization devices may be deployed in the blood vessels of the cerebral vascular system. Similarly contemplated for the revascularization systems and catheters of the present disclosure is deployment in other parts of the body wherein the specifications of the present disclosure may be used in other vessels of the body in a non-invasive manner.
According to embodiments, disclosed herein is a catheter-based revascularization system. The revascularization devices of the present disclosure are for revascularization of blood vessels. When the catheter-based revascularization system of the present disclosure is deployed into a blood vessel having an embolus, the revascularization device is expanded thereby opening the vessel so that the vessel can resume proper blood flow.
According to the instant teachings, deployment of the system of the present disclosure, establishes immediate 50% of the diameter of the lumen patency of the vessel being addressed. Among the prior art, no system having adequately small profile with flexibility to promote improved access for in-site treatment is known which may be used as a temporary (not implanted) solution. Those skilled in the art readily understand that detachment methods comprising mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, chemical, or thermal, and others are within the scope of the instant teachings.
Moreover, as the embolus dissolves, either via blood flow or by infusing lytic agents than the guidewire lumen, the deployed revascularization device radially filters larger embolus particles from traveling downstream, thereby reducing the chances of further complications. Once the blood vessel is revascularized, the revascularization device is modified to be in a removable state together with filtered detritus, and the catheter-revascularization system is removed from the blood vessels of the patient.
Likewise, in the event that no resolution of the embolus is noted in the instant revascularization system the inventors contemplate detachment and employment as a stent of the cage-like membrane. Angiographic recanalization has been associated with improvement in clinical outcome in the setting of acute stroke resulting from acute intracranial thrombotic occlusion. Anatomic limitations (tortuous anatomy, length of the occlusion, or location of occlusion) or supply limitations are among the reasons precluding use of prior art systems until the advent of the instant teachings.
Stenting has been used successfully to restore flow after abrupt reocclusion occurring after recanalization with other modalities in previous cases. Stenting has also been reported in cases in which other modalities have failed to recanalize vessels. Even if an underlying stenosis is rarely the cause of stroke, stenting may play a role by morselizing the embolic clot or trapping it against the arterial wall. In several embodiments, the present invention comprises an acute stroke revascularization process that comprises providing a reconstrainable self-expanding microstent system, deploying a self-expanding microstent within a neurological vessel; achieving at least one of revascularization and recanalization of a subject vessel; and removing the self-expanding microstent. In some embodiments, at least one supplemental therapy is also provided, and comprises one or more of the following: pharmacological thrombolytic agents, intraarterial thrombolytics, and mechanical manipulation.
The use of intracranial stents as a method for arterial recanalization during cerebral ischemia caused by focal occlusion of an intracranial vessel has been demonstrated to have benefits in some cases. Despite the use of available pharmacological and mechanical therapies, angiographic recanalization of occluded vessels has not been adequately achieved before stent placement, in most cases.
When SAH and intracranial hematoma occurred in patients in whom balloon-mounted stents were used, they most likely resulted from distal wire perforation. The distal wire purchase needed to navigate a coronary stent into the intracranial circulation may explain the occurrence of these adverse events. Alternatively, multiple manipulations of the Merci® brand of retriever device or expansion of balloon-mounted stents may have induced microdissections in the vessel. Stents designed for intracranial navigation have better navigability and pliability. The Wingspan® brand of stent (Boston Scientific) was designed to have more radial force than the Neuroform® brand of stent and may further improve this technique. However, the act clearly needs to advance further in this area.
IA therapy for stroke has evolved during the past decade. Approval of the Merci® brand of retriever device represents a significant step toward achieving better outcomes in acute stroke for patients not suitable for IV tPA. However, recanalization is not always achieved using this device. Therefore, additional treatment options are required, as offered for consideration herein.
Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is one of the main causes of ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged patients, representing 10% to 25% of such cases. Because infarct due to dissection is mainly thromboembolic, anticoagulation has been recommended to prevent new stroke in patients with acute dissection, provided they have no contraindications. In the acute phase, intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) given within 3 hours after onset of stroke due to dissection is reportedly safe and effective. However, this often needs supplemental therapy to be effective.
Endovascular treatment with stent deployment for ICA dissection with high-grade stenosis or occlusion may be most appropriate when anticoagulation fails to prevent a new ischemic event. In such cases, the MCA may be patent. However, to compare outcomes of patients with acute stroke consecutive to MCA occlusion due to ICA dissection treated either by stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis/thrombectomy or by IV rtPA thrombolysis. Stent assisted endovascular thrombolysis/thrombectomy compared favorably with IV rtPA thrombolysis, underscoring the need for the instant device.
The main limitation of this procedure is the immediate need for an experienced endovascular therapist. The number of cases of MCA occlusion due to carotid artery dissection was quite small and represented <10% of patients admitted for carotid dissection. However, despite these promising preliminary results, potential drawbacks related to the procedure must be considered. Acute complications such as transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, femoral or carotid dissection, and death have been reported. Other potential hazards of endovascular treatment of carotid dissection could have been observed. On balance, the risk-benefit favors solutions like the present invention.
Most patients with acute cerebrovascular syndrome with MC occlusion consecutive to ICA dissection have poor outcomes when treated with conventional IV rtPA thrombolysis, whereas most patients treated with stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis/thrombectomy show dramatic improvements. Further large randomized studies are required to confirm these data, which trends likewise are technical bases for the instant systems.
According to embodiments and as illustrated in
According to some examples of the instant system during shipping of catheter-revascularization system 100, shipping lock (not shown) is installed between delivery handle 106 and winged apparatus 108 to prevent deployment and premature extension of revascularization device 124 (see
According to embodiments, agent delivery device 130 provides a conduit in fluid communication with the lumen of the catheter-based revascularization system 100 enabling users of the system to deliver agents through catheter-revascularization system 100 directly to the location of the embolus. The instant revascularization system delivery device may be made from materials known to artisans, including stainless steel hypotube, stainless steel coil, polymer jackets, and/or radiopaque jackets. In one embodiment, the revascularization systems comprise a plurality of apertures 118 allowing infusable lytic agents to exit radially and distally into at least a subject embolus when transmitted through agent delivery device which is in fluid communication therewith. The revascularization systems according to several embodiments herein can comprise radiopacity for imaging purposes.
Accordingly, luer connector 132 or a functional equivalent provides sterile access to the lumen of catheter-based revascularization system 100 to effect delivery of a chosen agent. Artisans will understand that revascularization devices of the present invention include embodiments made essentially of nitinol or spring tempered stainless steel. Revascularization devices likewise may be coated or covered with therapeutic substances in pharmacologically effective amounts or lubricious materials. According to embodiments, coatings include namodopene, vasodialators, sirolamus, and paclitaxel. Additionally, at least heparin and other coating materials of pharmaceutical nature may be used.
Deployment end 104 of catheter-based revascularization system 100 comprises proximal segment 110 and distal segment 120. Proximal segment 110, according to embodiments, houses distal segment 120 and comprises outer catheter 112 that is of a suitable length and diameter for deployment into the blood vessel of the neck, head, and cerebral vasculature. For example in some embodiments, proximal segment 110 is from at least about 100 cm to approximately 115 cm long with an outer diameter of at least about 2.5 French to about 4 French.
Referring also to
Referring to both figures, revascularization device 124 is a self-expanding, reconstrictable retractable device tethered to inner catheter 122. Revascularization device 124 may be made from nitinol, spring tempered stainless steel, or equivalents as known and understood by artisans, according to embodiments. Revascularization device 124, according to embodiments and depending on the particular problem being addressed, may be from at least about 3.5 mm to about 50 mm in its expanded state. In an expanded state, revascularization device 124 is designed to expand in diameter to the luminal wall of blood vessel where it is deployed.
As known to artisans, revascularization device 124 may be coated or covered with substances imparting lubricous characteristics or therapeutic substances, as desired. Naturally, the expandable mesh design of revascularization device 124 must be a pattern whereby when revascularization device 124 is retracted, it is able to fully retract into inner catheter 122. The nature of the cell type likewise changes with respect to the embodiment used, and is often determined based upon nature of the clot.
In one embodiment, a revascularization device 124′ comprises a plurality of struts 127 and a plurality of open cells 129, as shown in
Catheter-revascularization system 100 is deployed through a patient's blood vessels. Once the user of catheter-revascularization system 100 determines that the embolus to be addressed is crossed, as known and understood well by artisans, revascularization device 124 is deployed by first positioning outer catheter 112 in a location immediately distal to the embolus.
Then, to revascularize/reperfuse the occluded blood vessel, distal catheter 120 is deployed in a location whereby revascularization device 124 expands at the location of the embolus, as illustrated by
As discussed above and claimed below, creating a channel for flow ideally includes making a vessel at least about halfway-patent, or 50% of diameter of a vessel being open. According to other embodiments, the channel created may be a cerebral equivalent of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction TIMI 1, TIMI 2, or TIMI 3.
Restoration of blood flow may act as a natural lytic agent and many emboli may begin to dissolve. Revascularization device 124 is designed, according to embodiments, to radially filter larger pieces of the dissolving embolus and prevent them from traveling distal to the device and potentially causing occlusion in another location. Because the revascularization device provides continuous radial pressure at the location of the obstruction, as the embolus dissolves, the blood flow continues to increase.
After the embolus is lysed, revascularization device 124 is sheathed into outer catheter 112 and removed from the body. According to embodiments, larger pieces of the thrombus may be retracted with revascularization device 124 after being captured in the radial filtering process. According to embodiments, revascularization device 124 may be detachable whereby the revascularization device 124 may detach from catheter-based revascularization system 100 if it is determined that revascularization device 124 should remain in the patient. As discussed above, illustrated in the Figures, and claimed below according to embodiments, catheter-based revascularization system 100 reconstrainable attachment or attachment by tether may be optionally detachable. Revascularization device detachment methods comprise mechanical, electrical hydraulic, chemical, thermal, and those other uses known to artisans.
According now to
According to the disclosure, a temporary tethered cage-like structure/tethered stent 201 is non-detachable in some embodiments but attached either to a hypotube or guide wire 199 allowing it to be navigated into tortuous vasculature in the brain. Device 201 may be attached to guide wire 199 or tube 200.
The delivery tube 200 is a variable stiffness tube that is able to track to and through the tortuous anatomy of the cerebral vasculature (i.e., internal carotid artery, MCA, ACA, vertebral and basilar).
The delivery tube 200 can be one or two pieces but must have greater proximal pushability (stiffness) & greater distal flexibility (softness) to allow tracking to distal cerebral arteries.
The delivery tube 200 should also have a lumen that enables tracking over a guide-wire. This feature provides a few benefits; ability to track and be delivered; ability to maintain access in the event different size devices need to be exchanged; provide support to arterial tree during device deployment and recovery. A flexible device may tend to herniate or prolapse into openings. The guide wire provides a pathway (concentric) to the artery and supports the device preventing such technical complications.
The delivery tube 200 can be mechanically attached to the tethered stent by soldering, welding or press fitting. Likewise, those skilled in the art readily understand their attachment mechanisms.
The cage-like structure/stent is made of nitinol to allow it to be compressed and loaded into an introducer for packaging. Similarly memory-based materials likewise function, in accordance with the instant systems.
By attaching it to a delivery wire, the cage-like structure/stent can be placed, retracted, repositioned and recaptured into a microcatheter.
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional No. 60/980,736, filed Oct. 17, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional No. 60/987,384, filed Nov. 12, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
In one embodiment, a method is disclosed comprising providing a microcatheter having at least a distal segment, proximal segment, and active segment for use above the subclavian artery and common carotid artery, wherein the active segment is radially expandable.
In one embodiment, a catheter system for use above the juncture of the subclavian artery and common carotid artery is provided, although other uses are equally appropriate as determined by qualified medical personnel and may be introduced via a guidewire. The device operates as a standard microcatheter during introduction into a patient. The distal segment, which is remotely deployable, has attached to it an active segment that expands radially to reperfuse emboli. After reperfusion, the active segment is returned to its configuration prior to expansion and the entire microcatheter system is removed.
According to embodiments and as illustrated by an exemplary embodiment in
According to embodiments, catheter length and diameter are suitable for inserting into a human patient and capable of reaching a target embolus in the region above the subclavian and common carotid arteries. For example, according to embodiments, microcatheter 1100 is about 150 cm long; proximal segment 1102 is about 115 cm with an outer diameter of about 4 French and distal segment 1104 is about 35 cm with an outer diameter of about 2.7 French. In one embodiment, the microcatheter 1100 is 135 cm long, proximal segment 1102 is 90 cm long, and distal segment 1104 is 45 cm long. In one embodiment, the microcatheter 1100 has an inner diameter of 0.012″. The inventors contemplate, according to embodiments a gradual decrease or stepwise in the outer diameter dimension as a function of the distal distance from proximal segment 1102, according to embodiments. For example, proximal segment 1102 is 4 French at the most proximal end and distal segment 1104 is 2.7 French at the most distal end. Disposed between is a segment having one or more intermediate outer diameters between 4 French and 2.7 French, such as 3.4 French and 3.0 French (see
According to embodiments, microcatheter 1100 is designed to follow a path of least resistance through a thrombus. Guidewire inserted through a thrombus tends to follow the path of least resistance through the softest parts of each thrombus. When microcatheter 1100 is inserted, it likewise follows this path of least resistance. As blood flow is restored, the natural lytic action further helps to break up the thrombus.
According to embodiments, active segment 1110 comprises a radially expandable woven mesh or coil. The mesh may be made from materials well known and understood by artisans, including polymers, fluoropolymers, nitinol, stainless steel, vectran, or kevlar. Other biocompatible materials that may be woven or coiled are similarly contemplated. Active segment 1110 is, according to embodiments, 5 mm to 50 mm in length when expanded and is designed to substantially return to its preexpansion configuration for removal of microcatheter after reperfusion. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 is 15 mm long.
As indicated above, active segment 1110 comprises a mesh. The mesh comprises a plurality of individual units, having a uniform size or spacing geometry or a variable size or spacing geometry. According to embodiments where the size or spacing geometry is variable, smaller size or spacing geometry is used to provide a tight mesh for expanding a channel through the thrombus. Larger size or spacing geometry units allow from blood flow through active segment 1110. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 comprises a woven polymer mesh that is heparin coated. In one embodiment, active segment 1110 has a suitable porosity to permit blood flow when expanded. In one embodiment, releasing expansion of active segment 1110 will trap thrombus in the mesh.
According to embodiments, variable cell size or spacing geometry is accomplished with points where the braid crosses over fixed filaments (PICS). Thus, the cell size or spacing geometry varies by varying the density of the braid. Where high radial force is needed to open a channel in an embolus, for example, the filaments of the mesh are denser and therefore cross each other more often, yielding small cell size or spacing geometry that leads to the application of greater radial force when the mesh expands. Where perfusion is desired, the PICS are less dense and the resulting cell size or spacing geometry is increased. Additionally, drug delivery through microcatheter will be more effective in mesh configurations having a large size or spacing geometry.
Active segment 1110 may be coated or covered with substances, such as lubricious agents or pharmacologically active agents, according to embodiments. For example, active segment 110 may be covered with heparin or other agents that are used in clot therapy, such as those that aid in dissolving clots or mitigating vasospasms.
According to similar embodiments, therapeutic agents are deployable through the lumen of microcatheter 1100, thereby allowing users of microcatheter 1100 to determine on a case-by-case basis whether to administer an agent. Accordingly, the braid/geometry of active segment 1110 is porous to allow the agent to pass from lumen of microcatheter 1100 into the blood vessel at the site of an embolus, for example.
Activation member 1120, according to embodiments, is a wire that connects proximal segment 1102 to distal segment 1104 and allows a user of microcatheter 1100 to deploy active segment 1110. Accordingly, activation member 1120 is made from stainless steel wire or braid, composites polymers and metal braids, ribbon or wire coils. According to embodiments, activation member 1120 comprises a hollow lumen that slidably moves over a guidewire to insert microcatheter 1100.
When active segment 1110 is expanded in a vessel, the radial expansion causes a channel to be formed in a thrombus for restored blood flow past the occlusion and thereby reperfuse the vessel. Activation of active segment 1110 is accomplished by mechanical methods, such as with activation member 1120 or by using liner of microcatheter 1110. Use of the liner is accomplished by leaving the liner unfused with active segment 1110.
For example, activation member 1120 fuses to the distal-most portion of activation segment 1110. According to embodiments, activation segment 1110 is heat set into a native confirmation in an expanded state. When activation member 1120 tensions active segment 1110, its confirmation changes from an expanded state into a deliverable state. Once delivered to the site of an embolus, activation member 1120 is adjusted to allow active segment 1110 to relax and thereby expand. According to similar embodiments, active segment 1110 is heat set into a native unexpanded confirmation. Activation member 1120 is used to tension active segment 1110 when delivered to the site of an embolus, thereby expanding it.
Other activation methods include electrical, chemical, and thermal activators, as is known and understood by artisans. Hydraulic activation may be accomplished with a balloon in the interior of the catheter that is filled with a fluid, thereby expanding the balloon, which expands active segment.
According to embodiments illustrated in
Once activated, active segment 1110 allows blood to flow around microcatheter 1100 and active segment 1110 to create therapeutic benefits associated with reperfusion. For example and according to embodiments, the portions of distal segment 1104 immediately proximal and distal to active segment 1110 may have a diameter of 2.0 French to 3.0 French and have installed therein revascularization ports 1112, as shown in
According to embodiments, a filter may be placed distal of active segment to prevent embolus pieces detached in the reperfusion process from escaping and causing distal occlusions. Accordingly, active segment is designed to capture pieces of embolus during the reperfusion processes. These pieces are captured within active segment 1110 when active segment 1110 is returned to its initial confirmation after expansion.
In some embodiments, active segment 1110 comprises an infusable microwire with an integrated filter as illustrated in
In some embodiments, the rapid reperfusion device comprises an infusable temporary stent as illustrated in
As shown in
According to embodiments illustrated in
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/989,422, filed Nov. 20, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
In some embodiments, the devices, methods and systems described herein facilitate and enable reconstruction of a vessel wall at the neck of an aneurysm.
According to embodiments, a tethered cage-like structure functions in conjunction with a coiling microcatheter system, among other things, by stabilizing vessel walls and providing tethered cage-like therapeutic support for treating aneurysms.
According to embodiments, methods and systems function with standard microcatheters to temporarily bridge aneurysmal necks.
According to embodiments, a cage-like structure is tethered to the end of a trackable delivery distal system. By bridging the neck of an aneurysm while permitting flow, coil embolization, for example, can be performed without risking vessel embolization. The tethered cage-like structure can then be proximally withdrawn.
The present inventors have discovered novel ways to treat aneurysms. In short, better treatment options can be offered for consideration than traditionally available, as discussed below. According to embodiments illustrated in
Several methods of treating aneurysms have been attempted, with varying degrees of success. For example, open craniotomy is a procedure by which an aneurysm is located, and treated, extravascularly. This type of procedure has significant disadvantages. For example, the patient undergoing open craniotomy must undergo general anesthesia. Also, the patient undergoes a great deal of trauma in the area of the aneurysm by virtue of the fact that the surgeon must sever various tissues in order to reach the aneurysm. In treating cerebral aneurysms extravascularly, for instances, the surgeon must typically remove a portion of the patient's skull, and must also traumatize brain tissue in order to reach the aneurysm.
Other techniques used in treating aneurysms are performed endovascularly. Such techniques typically involve attempting to form a mass within the sac of the aneurysm. Typically, a microcatheter is used to access the aneurysm. The distal tip of the microcatheter is placed within the sac of the aneurysm, and the microcatheter is used to place embolic material into the sac of the aneurysm. The embolic material includes, for example, detachable coils or an embolic agent, such as a liquid polymer. The placement of these types of embolic materials suffer from disadvantages, most of which are associated with migration of the embolic material out of the aneurysm into the parent artery. This can cause permanent and irreversible occlusion of the parent artery.
For example, when detachable coils are used to occlude an aneurysm which does not have a well defined neck region, the detachable coils can migrate out of the sac of the aneurysm and into the parent artery. Further, it is, at times, difficult to gauge exactly how full the sac of the aneurysm is when detachable coils are being placed. Therefore, there is a risk of overfilling the aneurysm in which case the detachable coils also herniate or prolapse into the parent artery.
Another disadvantage of detachable coils involves coil compaction over time. After filling the aneurysm, there remains space between the coils. Continued hemodynamic forces from the circulation act to compact the coil mass resulting in a cavity in the aneurysm neck. Thus the aneurysm can recanalize.
Embolic agent migration is also a problem. For instance, where a liquid polymer is placed into the sac of the aneurysm, it can migrate out of the sac of the aneurysm due to the hemodynamics of the system. This can also lead to irreversible occlusion of the parent vessel.
Techniques have been attempted in order to deal with the disadvantages associated with embolic material migration to the parent vessel. Some such techniques, commonly referred to as flow arrest techniques, typically involve temporarily occluding the parent vessel proximal of the aneurysm, so that no blood flow occurs through the parent vessel, until a thrombotic mass has formed in the sac of the aneurysm which helps reduce the tendency of the embolic material to migrate out of the aneurysm sac. However, thrombotic mass can dissolve through normal lysis of blood. Also, in certain cases, it is highly undesirable to occlude the parent vessel even temporarily. Therefore, this technique is, at times, not available as a treatment option. In addition, even occluding the parent vessel may not prevent all embolic material migration into the parent vessel.
Another endovascular technique for treating aneurysms involves inserting a detachable balloon into the sac of the aneurysm using a microcatheter. The detachable balloon is then inflated using saline and/or contrast fluid. The balloon is then detached from the microcatheter and left within the sac of the aneurysm in an attempt to fill the sac of the aneurysm. However, detachable balloons also suffer disadvantages. For example, detachable balloons, when inflated, typically will not conform to the interior configuration of the aneurysm sac. Instead, the detachable balloon requires the aneurysm sac to conform to the exterior surface of the detachable balloon. Thus, there is an increased risk that the detachable balloon will rupture the sac of the aneurysm. Further, detachable balloons can rupture and migrate out of the aneurysm.
Cerebral aneurysms occur in approximately 2% of the population. Approximately 30,000 aneurysms are treated annually in the USA. Aneurysms grow from a weakness in a blood vessel. Origins of aneurysms are presently unknown but linked to hypertension and injury.
About 80% of aneurysms are less than 10 mm with the remainder growing to as large as 40 mm. Most large aneurysms have wide necks characterized with a neck greater than 4 mm or a dome to neck ratio less than 2:1.
In cases when aneurysms have a wide neck, either stent-assisted coiling in practice or balloon remodeling is performed to embolize the aneurysm. During stent-assisted coiling, a stent (for example, the Boston Scientific® brand of Neuroform™ system or the Johnson and Johnson Cordis® Enterprise™ brand of) structure is placed within the artery of the vessel with the aneurysm in an attempt to reconstruct the vessel wall at the neck of the aneurysm.
Patients are typically anti-coagulated and anti-aggregated with a combination of aspirin and Plavix® to mitigate the thrombo-embolic effects of a foreign body response. The patients will maintain the drug regimen long after the embolization procedure.
However, patients with sub-arachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are not candidates for stents due the prophylactic drug regimen to mitigate the thrombo-embolic complications. A second approach is to perform balloon-remodeling. In this technique, a very soft, conformable balloon (the ev3 brand of Hyperform™ device) typically used for balloon-test-occlusion is placed in the artery at the neck to reconstruct the neck at the aneurysm origin. However, during this technique, flow arrest is performed while the balloon is inflated.
There is a risk of initiating an ischemic event during balloon remodeling and/or a thrombo-embolic event during flow arrest. This technique can be used during SAH because no additional prophylactic drug regimen is required. Once both these techniques are performed, coil embolization of the aneurysm can be performed. During the stenting procedure, the stent is permanently implanted. During balloon remodeling, the balloon is removed once embolization is completed.
A device that can reconstruct the vessel wall at the aneurysm neck origin has been created by tethering a cage-like structure to the distal end of a trackable delivery system. For example, the MindFrame® brand of cage-like structure tethered stent can be placed across the neck of aneurysm without prophylactically administered aspirin and Plavix® as well as not obstructing flow. The tethered stent allows perfusion through the body of the structure and provides support to the neck of the aneurysm allowing coil embolization procedure the tethered stent can be withdrawn proximally into the standard delivery microcatheter.
The device is delivered through standard microcatheters currently available to the interventionalist. An embolization microcatheter can either be placed into the aneurysm prior to placement of the tethered stent or after placement of the tethered stent. If the latter is preferred then the coil embolization microcatheter must be placed through the struts of the tethered stents to access the body of the aneurysm to commence coiling. Both techniques are performed during standard stenting procedures.
Referring back to
The system provides a method to assist in aneurysm embolization that does not restrict blood flow and can be used without placing patients on ASA/Plavix® during embolization. During balloon remodeling, flow arrest is performed. During stenting, patients need ASA/Plavix®.
Referring also to
The cage-like structure/stent is made of Nitinol to allow it to be compressed and loaded into an introducer for packaging. Similarly memory-based materials likewise function, in accordance with the instant systems.
The introducer enables the device to be transferred into a microcatheter and deploy to a trusted location such as an aneurysm neck.
The cage-like structure/stent is attached to the delivery wire described previously.
By attaching it to a delivery wire, the cage-like structure/stent can be placed, retracted, repositioned and recaptured into a microcatheter.
This is an important feature. The device, being temporary, allows for the following: 1) perfusion of blood through artery during coiling; 2) perfusion from coiling herniation or prolapse; and 3) removal of the device, mitigating the use of Aspirin and Plavix.
A technical basis for the term “super-elastic” found in the class of nickel-titanium alloys known as “nitinol” alloys discovered by the United States Navy Ordinance Laboratory. These materials are discussed in length in U.S. Pat. Nos.; U.S. Pat. No. 3,174,851 to Beuhler, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 3,351,463 to Rozner, et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,753,700 to Harrison, et al. Alloys known to be suitable for this invention are those containing at least 1.5% (wt) and up to about 85% (wt) or more, of one or more alloying members selected from the group consisting of vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, and cobalt. By the term “stent” or “ribbon”, we intend to include elongated shapes, the cross section of which are not square or round and may typically be rectangular, oval, or semi-oval. They should have an aspect ratio of 0.05 (thickness/width) or less, depending on application at issue. Other disclosure can be found in U.S. Provisional No. 60/989,422, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
As excerpted from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/015,154, filed Dec. 19, 2007, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference,
In some embodiments, the devices, methods, and systems described herein facilitate and enable treatment of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. More specifically, a tethered basket-like system operates in conjunction with a microcatheter system, to provide arterial support and capture emboli.
In one embodiment, a device for the removal of emboli is disclosed comprising a mesh capturer having at least an undeployed state and a deployed state, the mesh capturer being inserted into the neurovasculature in an undeployed state and removed from the microvasculature in its deployed or retracted state. wherein the mesh capturer is deployed into its deployed state distal to an embolus and advanced proximally until the embolus is substantially contained within the mesh capturer; and wherein the basket is deployed above the subclavian artery and common carotid artery. In some embodiments, the device is inserted into the vasculature over a guidewire. In some embodiments, the device is inserted into the vasculature as a component of a rapid exchange system.
In one embodiment, a method for removing an embolus is disclosed comprising inserting a microcatheter and guidewire distal to an embolus; inserting a embolus capture device over the wire through the microcatheter distal to the embolus; deploying the embolus capture device; retracting the deployed embolus capture device until the embolus is substantially contained within the embolus capture device; and removing the embolus capture device. In some embodiments, the embolus capture device is deployed over a guidewire.
The present inventors have realized that by leveraging a conventional self-expanding reperfusion device delivery platform, a poly-modic system can be iterated which crosses an embolus, filters, and either removes the offending embolus or is optionally emplaced to address the same. A paucity of extant systems effective for such combination therapies is noted among the art.
According to embodiments of the system illustrated in
According to embodiments illustrated in
In one embodiment, deployment of the system illustrated in
Additionally, in reperfusion applications the emboli removal device may be deployed as a safety device. As the embolus lyses, the deployed emboli removal device filters larger embolus particles from migrating distally, thereby reducing the chances of further complications. If reperfusion is unsuccessful, then the emboli removal device is retracted proximally, thereby substantially capturing the embolus. Then the entire device is removed together with the microcatheter.
According to embodiments and as illustrated in
To address the problem of the guidewire offset, the inventors devised an embolus capture device 2200 that is adept at capturing embolus 2120 even when deployed in an offset way. As part of the embolus capture device 2200 design, pieces of embolus 2120 that break away from embolus 2120 are recaptured to prevent potential migration more distal in the vasculature which may potentially cause other emboli, too remote to safely address.
As illustrated in
Embolus capture device 2200 comprises mesh basket 2210 and tethers 2220 which are deployed from microcatheter 2230. Mesh basket 2210 comprises a radially expandable woven mesh or coil basket open on the proximal end and closed at the distal end. The mesh may be made from materials well known and understood by artisans, including polymers, fluoropolymers, nitinol, stainless steel, vectran, or kevlar. Other biocompatible materials that may be woven or coiled are similarly contemplated. Mesh basket 2210 connects to microcatheter 2230 via tethers 2220 and is designed to be compatible such that it is removable in its deployed state without causing dissection or other damage to the vasculature.
Mesh basket 2210 comprises a plurality of individual units, having a uniform size or spacing geometry or a variable size or spacing geometry. According to embodiments where the size or spacing geometry is variable, smaller size or spacing geometry is used to provide a tight mesh for preventing the passage of small pieces of embolus 2120 that break away. Larger size or spacing geometry units allow from blood flow 2110. In all cases, size or spacing geometry will not allow pieces of embolus 2120 that may cause potential complications.
Tethers 2220 serve to provide structure for mesh basket 2110, while providing large openings whereby blood may freely flow from the proximal to distal end of embolus removal device 2200. According to embodiments, tethers 2220 are made from the same material as mesh basket 2210. Those skilled in the art will readily understand that materials for tethers and mesh may be the same, different, or interchangeable, as needed.
During deployment of embolus capture device 2200, mesh basket is stored in microcatheter 2230 in an undeployed state. In the undeployed state, microcatheter 2230 is advanced distal to embolus 2120 and mesh basket 2210 is deployed. According to embodiments, both mesh basket 2210 and tethers 2220 are deployed distal to embolus 2120 to prevent tethers 2220 from dislodging pieces of embolus 2120 prior to full expansion of mesh basket 2210, thereby preventing the pieces from advancing distal to the embolus 2120 before mesh basket 2210 is in place to filter them.
After deployment, according to embodiments, embolus removal system 2200 is retracted proximally until embolus is substantially contained within mesh basket 2210. Thereafter, mesh basket 2210 and microcatheter 2230 are removed from the vasculature of the patient. During removal of mesh basket 2210 and microcatheter 2230, embolus 2120 is trapped within mesh basket 2210 and withdrawn from vessel 2110.
According to embodiments, microcatheter 2230 length and diameter are suitable for inserting into a human patient and capable of reaching a target embolus in the region above the subclavian and common carotid arteries. For example, according to embodiments, microcatheter 2230 is about 150 cm long; microcatheter has a proximal segment (at a control end of microcatheter 2230) that is about 115 cm long with an outer diameter of about 3.5 French and a distal segment (at a deployment end of microcatheter 2230) is about 35 cm with an outer diameter of about 2.7 French. The inventors contemplate, according to embodiments a gradual decrease or stepwise in the outer diameter dimension as a function of the distal distance from proximal segment, according to embodiments. For example, proximal segment is 3.5 French at the most proximal end and distal segment is 2.7 French at the most distal end. Disposed between is a segment having one or more intermediate outer diameters between 3.5 French and 2.7 French, such as 3.2 French and 3.0 French. The inner diameter of microcatheter 230 is 0.012 to 0.029 inches, according to embodiments, which allows microcatheter to be inserted along a preinserted guidewire or used to infuse therapeutic agents. According to embodiments, the performance of microcatheter 2230 is comparable to standard microcatheters 2230 and is designed to track over a guidewire through the neurovasculature.
As illustrated by embodiments in
Alternately and as illustrated according to embodiments in
If reperfusion is not successful to a desired degree, then embolus capture device 2200 is inserted through the microcatheter as described herein and deployed distal to the embolus 2120. For example, creating a channel for flow ideally includes making a vessel at least about halfway-patent, or 50% of diameter of a vessel being open. According to embodiments, the channel created may be a cerebral equivalent of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0, TIMI 1, or TIMI 2, TIMI 3, and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) and TICI 3. In these cases, blood flow is not accomplished to a desired degree. It is therefore desirable to remove the entire embolus. Thus, after embolus capture device 2200 is deployed distal to the embolus, it is retreated proximal until embolus 2120 is substantially inside of mesh basket 2210 in operation 2512. Thereafter, mesh basket 2210, embolus 2120, and microcatheter 2230 are removed.
The embolus capture devices of the present disclosure may be designed for over the wire deployment or rapid exchange deployment, according to embodiments.
In one embodiment, ischemic stroke reperfusion or clot capture is performed by a reperfusion device or embolus capture device comprising a NiTi cut tube.
One embodiment for ischemic stroke clot retrieval includes an eccentric design. This embodiment addresses the problem during clot removal of the thrombectomy device being forced off-center because of microcatheter positioning after the microcatheter/guidewire passes the embolus. This “off-centering” causes the device to miss the embolus when pulled proximal to attempt to capture it or fragmenting will occur because the device will shave the embolus. In some embodiments, an off center delivery system is used to capture the embolus. In some embodiments, the struts are designed or favored to the periphery of the artery as opposed to the center of the artery. In some embodiments, the struts are designed to accumulate in 270 degrees of the thrombectomy device allowing open space for the embolus to fall into. By making the attachment point off-center, the open area is increased. By making the device off-center from the point of attachment to the delivery system, the device must increase the chance of capturing the embolus, which is also off-center from the microcatheter.
The chart below illustrates several ischemic stroke delivery system assembly embodiment options:
In some embodiments, the delivery systems maintain an outer diameter at the solder joint of 0.024″ max. In some embodiments, the PET heat shrink is installed over the distal 45 cm of the delivery device. In some embodiments, the distal tip of the delivery system is trimmed after installation of the PET heat shrink. In some embodiments, the distal and proximal ends of the delivery system are deburred. In some embodiments, the delivery systems must accept a 0.010″ guidewire.
The chart below illustrates dimensions for embodiments of the hypotube assembly, or delivery system.
The embodiments disclosed in the tables above accept a 0.010 G.W. (guidewire) straight. In some embodiments, the distal tip of the hypotube 3112 is ground (e.g., to 0.0175″) to accept the inner diameter (e.g., 0.015″) of the ribbon coil 3113. The distal tip of the hypotube 3112 is soldered to the proximate tip of the ribbon coil 3113. The PET 3114 is cut to 45 cm, the heat shrink is heated to 400 degrees Fahrenheit, and restrained while heated.
A study was performed to evaluate in-vitro tracking of embodiments of delivery system. The testing equipment included: a FlowTek A201 with stroke model, a 5F CORDIS® ENVOY™ MPD guide catheter, a 135 cm×0.027″ inner diameter CORDIS® MASS TRANSIT™ microcatheter, and a 0.010 diameter×200 cm length TRANSEND® guidewire. The study used the following numbered scoring system: (1) pass with no friction at all; (2) pass with acceptable friction; (3) pass with some friction; (4) pass with difficulty; (5) can't pass.
The following notes were taken from the study regarding guidewire tracking. Design 1 passed fine until the PCOM segment with a score of 4. Design 2 experienced some friction requiring 300 cm of exchange wire with a score of 3/4. Design 4 scored a 5 at curve 4. Design 5 scored a 4 generally. Designs 3 and 4 had a 0.0155″ inner diameter and designs 1 and 2 had a 0.014″ inner diameter. Design 5 had a 0.002″×0.010″×0.018″ hypotube ribbon coil.
Strut thicknesses for the recanalization or reperfusion devices described herein can include 0.0040″, 0.0025″, 0.0020″, and 0.0009″. The strut thicknesses may vary. The devices may be used for reperfusion and may be tethered. The devices may or may not be recapturable and may or may not include markers.
In some embodiments, the devices described herein are be used for clot removal and comprise a clot basket or spiral basket. In one embodiment, the clot removal device comprises a woven retrieval basket. The woven retrieval basket may include features such as an over the wire design, low porosity fine wires in the basket area to support a clot (wire dia: 0.035 mm and 56-97 pics/cm), or thicker wires that open the basket and give it tensile strength (wire dia: 0.076 mm). The woven retrieval basket may also be fully automatable.
In another embodiment, a reperfusion catheter device includes a nitinol braid. In one embodiment, the braid includes 24 strands with a wire size of 0.076 mm, a braid angle of 42 degrees, an expanded diameter of 3.5 mm, and a collapsed diameter of approximately 0.030″. Other disclosure can be found in U.S. Provisional No. 61/015,154, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
While the apparatus and method have been described in terms of what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure need not be limited to the disclosed embodiments. It is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the claims, the scope of which should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures. The present disclosure includes any and all embodiments of the following claims.
It should also be understood that a variety of changes may be made without departing from the essence of the invention. Such changes are also implicitly included in the description. They still fall within the scope of this invention. It should be understood that this disclosure is intended to yield a patent covering numerous aspects of the invention both independently and as an overall system and in both method and apparatus modes.
Further, each of the various elements of the invention and claims may also be achieved in a variety of manners. This disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, be it a variation of an embodiment of any apparatus embodiment, a method or process embodiment, or even merely a variation of any element of these.
Particularly, it should be understood that as the disclosure relates to elements of the invention, the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms—even if only the function or result is the same.
Such equivalent, broader, or even more generic terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms can be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad coverage to which this invention is entitled.
It should be understood that all actions may be expressed as a means for taking that action or as an element which causes that action.
Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action which that physical element facilitates.
Any patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this application for patent are hereby incorporated by reference. In addition, as to each term used it should be understood that unless its utilization in this application is inconsistent with such interpretation, common dictionary definitions should be understood as incorporated for each term and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms such as contained in at least one of a standard technical dictionary recognized by artisans and the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, latest edition are hereby incorporated by reference.
Finally, all referenced listed in the Information Disclosure Statement or other information statement filed with the application are hereby appended and hereby incorporated by reference; however, as to each of the above, to the extent that such information or statements incorporated by reference might be considered inconsistent with the patenting of this/these invention(s), such statements are expressly not to be considered as made by the applicant(s).
In this regard it should be understood that for practical reasons and so as to avoid adding potentially hundreds of claims, the applicant has presented claims with initial dependencies only.
Support should be understood to exist to the degree required under new matter laws—including but not limited to United States Patent Law 35 USC 132 or other such laws—to permit the addition of any of the various dependencies or other elements presented under one independent claim or concept as dependencies or elements under any other independent claim or concept.
To the extent that insubstantial substitutes are made, to the extent that the applicant did not in fact draft any claim so as to literally encompass any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, the applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended to or actually relinquished such coverage as the applicant simply may not have been able to anticipate all eventualities; one skilled in the art, should not be reasonably expected to have drafted a claim that would have literally encompassed such alternative embodiments.
Further, the use of the transitional phrase “comprising” is used to maintain the “open-end” claims herein, according to traditional claim interpretation. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it should be understood that the term “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps.
Such terms should be interpreted in their most expansive forms so as to afford the applicant the broadest coverage legally permissible.
The instant application claims full Paris Convention priority to, and incorporates expressly by reference U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/980,736, filed Oct. 17, 2007. Likewise, the instant application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/044,392, filed Apr. 11, 2008; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/015,154, filed Dec. 19, 2007; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/989,422, filed Nov. 20, 2007; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/987,384, filed Nov. 12, 2007; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/019,506, filed Jan. 7, 2008, each as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709999 | Nagel | Jun 1955 | A |
3174851 | Buehler et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3351463 | Rozner et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3506171 | Rupert | Apr 1970 | A |
3753700 | Harrison et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4650466 | Luther | Mar 1987 | A |
4993481 | Kamimoto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998539 | Delsanti | Mar 1991 | A |
5035686 | Crittenden et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5057114 | Wittich et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5222964 | Cooper | Jun 1993 | A |
5222971 | Willard et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5275622 | Lazarus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5312344 | Grinfeld et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327885 | Griffith | Jul 1994 | A |
5344395 | Whalen | Sep 1994 | A |
5370653 | Cragg | Dec 1994 | A |
5425739 | Jessen | Jun 1995 | A |
5449372 | Schmaltz | Sep 1995 | A |
5456667 | Ham et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5527282 | Segal | Jun 1996 | A |
5643309 | Myler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649906 | Gory et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653743 | Martin | Aug 1997 | A |
5681336 | Clement et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683449 | Marcade | Nov 1997 | A |
5695469 | Segal | Dec 1997 | A |
5718724 | Goicoechea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5792157 | Mische | Aug 1998 | A |
5795322 | Boudewijn | Aug 1998 | A |
5800457 | Gelbfish | Sep 1998 | A |
5800519 | Sandock | Sep 1998 | A |
5827324 | Cassell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5853419 | Imran | Dec 1998 | A |
5916235 | Gugliemlim | Jun 1999 | A |
5922019 | Hankh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928260 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5938671 | Katoh | Aug 1999 | A |
5938697 | Killion et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941895 | Myler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947995 | Samuels | Sep 1999 | A |
5951599 | McCrory | Sep 1999 | A |
5961547 | Razavi | Oct 1999 | A |
5968013 | Smith et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972016 | Morales | Oct 1999 | A |
5972157 | Engelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5972219 | Habets | Oct 1999 | A |
5976120 | Chow et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980514 | Kupiecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001118 | Daniel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010449 | Selmon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6010498 | Guglielmi | Jan 2000 | A |
6010521 | Lee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015424 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051020 | Goicoechea et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063070 | Eder | May 2000 | A |
6063104 | Villar et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063111 | Hieshima et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066149 | Samson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066158 | Engelson | May 2000 | A |
6093199 | Brown et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096034 | Kupiecki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106548 | Roubin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117167 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123115 | Greenhalgh | Sep 2000 | A |
6136006 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146396 | Konya et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159238 | Killion et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159239 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6164339 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2000 | A |
6168592 | Kupiecki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168604 | Cano | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190358 | Fitzmaurice | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192944 | Greenhalgh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193708 | Ken et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210364 | Anderson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217609 | Haverkost | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221096 | Aiba et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231598 | Berry et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238430 | Klumb et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280413 | Clark et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283940 | Mulholland | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283992 | Hankh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290720 | Khosravi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305436 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312459 | Huang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322585 | Khosravi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325815 | Kusleika et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325820 | Khosravi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325822 | Chouinard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344041 | Kupiecki et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6383205 | Samson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390993 | Cornish et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402771 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6454780 | Wallace | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458139 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468301 | Amplatz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475236 | Roubin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475237 | Drasler | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485500 | Kokish | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485509 | Killion et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6537294 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551341 | Boylan et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551342 | Shen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553810 | Webb et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554842 | Heuser et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554856 | Doorly et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558405 | McInnes | May 2003 | B1 |
6562066 | Martin | May 2003 | B1 |
6569179 | Teoh et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569193 | Cox et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575997 | Palmer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589265 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592607 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592615 | Marcade et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605057 | Fitzmaurice | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610077 | Hancock et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616617 | Ferrera et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629953 | Boyd | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632241 | Hancock et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635081 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638294 | Palmer | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641590 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652505 | Tsugita | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652576 | Stalker | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660021 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663607 | Slaikeu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666829 | Cornish et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669723 | Killion et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673025 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685722 | Rosenbluth | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6685738 | Chouinard et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695813 | Boyle et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702843 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709440 | Callol et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716178 | Kilpatrick et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6723112 | Ho et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730104 | Sepetka et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6733519 | Lashinski | May 2004 | B2 |
6746468 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764506 | Roubin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773454 | Wholey et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790237 | Stinson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795979 | Fournier | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802851 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818015 | Hankh et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821291 | Bolea et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824558 | Parodi | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833003 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840958 | Nunez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6881220 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893413 | Martin | May 2005 | B2 |
6913612 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949620 | Aida et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955685 | Escamilla et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960227 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6991641 | Diaz | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994723 | McMahon | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7001422 | Escamilla et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004954 | Voss | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7004955 | Shen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004956 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018401 | Hyodoh et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7029688 | Hubbell et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037329 | Martin | May 2006 | B2 |
7041116 | Goto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048014 | Hyodoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056328 | Arnott | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7056336 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060091 | Killion et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7089218 | Visel | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112217 | Kugler et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7118600 | Dua et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125419 | Sequin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128736 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7144421 | Carpenter et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147655 | Chermoni | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147660 | Chobotov et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156869 | Pacetti | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7160317 | McHale | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169165 | Belef et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172575 | El-Nounou | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7172617 | Colgan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175607 | Lim | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179273 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179284 | Khosravi et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201769 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201770 | Johnson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223284 | Khosravi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238197 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7240516 | Pryor | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241301 | Thramann et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7279003 | Berra et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279292 | Imam et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285126 | Sepetka et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294147 | Hartley | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300458 | Henkes et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306619 | Palmer | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7309345 | Wallace | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7309351 | Escamilla | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7323000 | Monstdt et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323005 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323006 | Andreas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326240 | Caro et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7344550 | Carrison et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344556 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351255 | Andreas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7354455 | Stinson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402169 | Killion et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407509 | Greenberg et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435254 | Chouinard et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438720 | Shaked | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455646 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473272 | Pryor | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494474 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7549974 | Nayak | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7691122 | Dieck et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708704 | Mitelberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727242 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7727243 | Sepetka et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749243 | Phung | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780694 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833240 | Okushi | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7972342 | Gandhi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8052640 | Fiorella et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062307 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066757 | Ferrera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070791 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088140 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100918 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100935 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105333 | Sepetka et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8197493 | Ferrera | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010000797 | Mazzocchi | May 2001 | A1 |
20010004705 | Killion et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010013 | Cox et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010031981 | Evans | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034531 | Ho et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044633 | Klint | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044647 | Pinchuk et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047202 | Slaikeu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051823 | Khosravi et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004681 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007210 | Chouinard et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016564 | Courtney et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016624 | Patterson | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032479 | Hankh et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038142 | Khosravi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038146 | Harry | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052643 | Wholey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068968 | Hupp | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020072790 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087209 | Edwin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091355 | Hayden | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095141 | Belef | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020143387 | Soetikno et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161377 | Rabkin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169458 | Connors, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183831 | Rolando et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198588 | Armstrong et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004536 | Boylan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023230 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023299 | Amplatz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032941 | Boyle | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032977 | Brady | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040771 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040772 | Hyodoh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055440 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055451 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074056 | Killion et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078605 | Bashiri | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097114 | Ouriel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105484 | Boyle | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125791 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125798 | Martin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130719 | Martin | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139803 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149475 | Hyodoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153944 | Phung | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176914 | Rabkin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195554 | Shen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199921 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204202 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002752 | Griffin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006306 | Evans et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006381 | Sequin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019322 | Hoffmann | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030378 | Khosravi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034386 | Fulton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049258 | Khosravi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054367 | Jimenez, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059259 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059407 | Escamilla et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068288 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073300 | Chouinard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078071 | Escamilla et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079429 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088002 | Boyle | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102838 | Killion et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106979 | Goicoechea et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114912 | Okamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147939 | Rabkin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153117 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158307 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158312 | Chouinard et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186562 | Cox | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193246 | Ferrera | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199201 | Kellett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215312 | Andreas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215319 | Berra et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249439 | Richter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254628 | Nazzaro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260385 | Jones et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033334 | Santra et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033349 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033409 | Burke et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038447 | Huffmaster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038468 | Panetta et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038496 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049676 | Nazzaro et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055047 | Greenhalgh | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060017 | Fischell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075715 | Borges et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080480 | Bolea et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090857 | Kusleika et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090888 | Hines et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102018 | Carpenter et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107823 | Leone et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119684 | Guterman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125023 | Bates | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050126979 | Lowe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131515 | Cully et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131516 | Greenhalgh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159774 | Belef | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177228 | Solem et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187612 | Edwin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192661 | Griffen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209673 | Shaked | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209675 | Ton et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209678 | Henkes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216050 | Sepetka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222583 | Cano | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222607 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267570 | Shadduck | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277978 | Greenhalgh | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020285 | Niermann | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020321 | Parker | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025845 | Escamilla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025850 | Feller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030865 | Balg | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036281 | Patterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052816 | Bates et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058833 | VanCamp | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058836 | Bose et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058838 | Bose et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074480 | Bales | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089703 | Escamilla et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100663 | Palmer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106421 | Teoh | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106448 | Shaked | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122685 | Bonsignore et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135947 | Soltesz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142841 | Khosravi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142849 | Killion et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060195172 | Luo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200048 | Furst | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200221 | Malewicz | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224180 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229645 | Bonnette | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259119 | Rucker | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265054 | Greenhalgh et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271090 | Shaked et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276883 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287701 | Pal | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287704 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032852 | Machek et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043424 | Pryor | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043425 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055299 | Ishimaru | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055358 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055360 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055365 | Greenberg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067011 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073376 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088387 | Eskridge et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100425 | Sequin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118205 | Davidson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123972 | Greenberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135826 | Zaver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135888 | Khosravi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141036 | Barrueta et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142896 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156170 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156228 | Majercak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162109 | Davila et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191866 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191884 | Eskridge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191924 | Rudakov | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198028 | Miloslavski | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198030 | Martin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198075 | Levy | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203452 | Mehta | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203559 | Freudenthal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208367 | Fiorella | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208371 | French et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219621 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225794 | Thramann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233236 | Pryor | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250040 | Provost et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070266542 | Melsheimer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270932 | Headley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288034 | MacCollum et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288037 | Cheng | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288080 | Maccollum et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288083 | Hines | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299503 | Berra et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001333 | Kleine et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015558 | Harlan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015682 | Majercak et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033528 | Satasiya et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039926 | Majercak et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039930 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045995 | Guterman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046064 | Sequin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046072 | Laborde et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051803 | Monjtadt | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058724 | Wallace | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071178 | Greenland et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077175 | Palmer | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082159 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086196 | Truckai et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097495 | Feller et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103477 | Jones | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103585 | Monjtadt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109063 | Hancock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109067 | Caro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114445 | Melsheimer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125855 | Henkes et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140107 | Bei | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140181 | Reynolds | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147100 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161903 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161936 | Feller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167708 | Molland et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195140 | Myla | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200946 | Braun et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208319 | Rabkin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221554 | O'Connor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221600 | Dieck et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221664 | Bales et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221671 | Chouinard et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228216 | Strauss et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234795 | Snow et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243229 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243232 | Hegg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247943 | Lanza | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249598 | Sherry | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255678 | Cully et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262506 | Griffin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262528 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262532 | Martin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262592 | Jordan | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262952 | Channell | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269774 | Garcia et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269868 | Bei | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275497 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275498 | Palmer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080275536 | Zarins et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281302 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281350 | Sepetka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281393 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281397 | Killion et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281403 | Kavteladze | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306503 | Que et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306504 | Win et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312732 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319525 | Tieu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319533 | Lehe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018633 | Lindquist et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018634 | State | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018640 | State | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024157 | Anukhin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025820 | Adams | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030502 | Sun et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036968 | Hepworth et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036977 | Rassat et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062726 | Ford et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062773 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090062834 | Moftakhar et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068097 | Sevrain | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069828 | Martin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069836 | Labdag et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076450 | Caizza et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082800 | Janardhan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093822 | Ducharme | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105644 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105722 | Fulkerson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105747 | Chanduszko et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125053 | Ferrera et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090192455 | Ferrera et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090292297 | Ferrera | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299393 | Martin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022951 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100100106 | Ferrera | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114017 | Lenker et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114135 | Wilson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137892 | Krolik et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152766 | Dieck et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174309 | Fulkerson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217187 | Fulkerson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100256600 | Ferrera | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100299911 | Gianotti et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318097 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009875 | Grandfield | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110009941 | Grandfield et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110060212 | Slee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110152920 | Eckhouse et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160742 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160757 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160760 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160761 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160763 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166586 | Sepetka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172699 | Miller et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184456 | Grandfield et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190797 | Fulkerson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202088 | Eckhouse et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238106 | Ferrera et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110270178 | Fiorella et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288572 | Martin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301686 | Bowman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319917 | Ferrera et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016396 | Dehnad | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016406 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022576 | Ferrera et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022581 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035648 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041411 | Horton | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041449 | Eckhouse | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041459 | Fiorella et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041460 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041464 | Monetti et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041474 | Eckhouse et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041475 | Ferrera et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120046686 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120065660 | Ferrera et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071964 | Cattaneo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078140 | Nita | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078285 | Griffin | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089216 | Rapaport | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116443 | Ferrera et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0321912 | Jun 1989 | EP |
820729 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1000590 | May 2000 | EP |
1437097 | Jul 2004 | EP |
2257248 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2301450 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2417919 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2003-033359 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2006-094876 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007-222658 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-236471 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO-9403127 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9855173 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO0032265 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0053120 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0108743 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0136034 | May 2001 | WO |
WO0145569 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO03011188 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03017823 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2007089897 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007121005 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008117256 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008117257 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008124728 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009105710 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009124288 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009126747 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2010010545 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010023671 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010046897 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010049121 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2010062363 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010102307 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010115642 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2010121037 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2010121049 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2011054531 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011095352 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011133486 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2011135556 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2011144336 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2011147567 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2012009675 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012025245 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012025247 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Micro Therapeutics, Inc., DBA EV3 Neurovascular, Inc., Solitaire FR Revascularization Device, Instructions for Use, 70494-001 Rev, Mar. 2009. |
Micro Therapeutics, Inc., DBA EV3 Neurovascular, Inc., Fully deployable. Completely retrievable. Solitaire AB, Neurovascular Remodeling Device. |
Robertson, Kathy, Stroke device startup lands National Science Foundation grant, Sacramento Business Journal, Oct. 23, 2009, Sacramento, California, USA. |
Michael E. Kelly, MD, et al., Recanalization of an Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Using a Self-Expanding, Reconstrainable, Intracranial Microstent as a Temporary Endovascular Bypass; American Heart Association Journal, Jun. 2008 edition, U.S. |
Middle Cerebral Artery Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke After Unsuccessful Merci Retrieval; Special Technical Report; Neurosurgery 60:701-706, 2007. |
David M. Pelz, et al., Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2007; American Heart Association Journal, Nov. 2007 edition. U.S. |
Philippa C. Lavallée, et al., Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. AHA 2007. |
E.I. Levy et al., Self-Expanding Stents for Recanalization of Acute Cerebrovascular Occlusions ; AJNR May 28, 2007 U.S. |
T.W. Duerig, D.E. Tolomeo, M. Wholey, An Overview of Superelastic Stent Design. |
Henkes, H. et al., “A Microcatheter-Delivered Highly-Flexible and Fully-Retrievable Stent, Specifically Designed for Intracranial Use,” Interventional Neuroradiology, vol. 9, pp. 391-393 (Dec. 2003). |
Doerfler, A. et al., “A Novel Flexible, Retrievable Endovascular Stent System for Small-Vessel Anatomy: Preliminary In Vivo Data,” Am. J. Neuroradiol. vol. 26, pp. 862-868 (Apr. 2005). |
Liebig, T. et al., “A novel self-expanding fully retrievable intracranial stent (SOLO): experience in nine procedures of stent-assisted aneurysm coil occlusion,” Neuroradiology vol. 48, pp. 471-478 (Jul. 2006). |
Yavuz, K. et al., “Immediate and midterm follow-up results of using an electrodetachable, fully retrievable SOLO stent system in the endovascular coil occlusion of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms,” J. Neurosurg. vol. 107, pp. 49-55 (Jul. 2007). |
“Penumbra, Inc. Enrolls First Patients in PULSE Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Fully Retrievable, Dense Mesh Temporary Stent for Immediate Flow Restoration in Interventional Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment,” Business Wire, Nov. 1, 2010, downloaded at http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20101101006991/en/Penumbra-Enrolls-Patients-PULSE-Clinical-Trial-Evaluate. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/980,736, filed Oct. 17, 2007, Fulkerson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60,987,384, filed Nov. 12, 2007, Fulkerson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/989,422, filed Nov. 20. 2007, Ferrera et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/015,154, filed Dec. 19, 2007, Ferrera et al. |
Wakhloo, et al., “Retrievable Closed Cell Intracranial Stent for Foreign Body and Clot Removal,” Neurosurgery, May, 2008. |
Michael E. Kelly, MD, et al., Recanalization of an Acute Cerebral Artery Occlusion Using a Self-Expanding, Reconstrainable, Intracranial Microstent as a Temporary Endovascular Bypass; AHA Journal, Jun. 2008 edition. |
Eric Sauvegeau, MD et al. Middle Cerebral Artery Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke After Unsuccessful Merci Retrieval; Special Technical Report; Neurosurgery 60:701-706, 2007. |
David M. Pelz, et al., Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2007; American Heart Association Journal, Nov. 2007. |
Philippa C. Lavallee, et al., Stent-Assisted Endovascular Thrombolysis Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Internal Carotid Artery Dissection with Tandem Internal Carotid and Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion, AHA 2007. |
E.I. Levy et al., Self-Expanding Stents for Recanalization of Acute Cerebrovascular Occulsions; AJNR May 28, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090105737 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60980736 | Oct 2007 | US | |
61044392 | Apr 2008 | US | |
61015154 | Dec 2007 | US | |
60989422 | Nov 2007 | US | |
60987384 | Nov 2007 | US | |
61019506 | Jan 2008 | US |