This application is a Non-provisional U.S. Patent Application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/676,563, entitled “Adaptable Rotating Arc Welding Method and System,” filed Jul. 27, 2012, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The invention relates generally to welding techniques, and more particularly to improved processes of detecting and adjusting for poor fit-up between workpieces in such a way that enhances performance, reduces waste, and may reduce rejection of finished parts. The present disclosure is related to previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/526,278, entitled “Metal Cored Welding Method and System,” filed on Jun. 18, 2012, which is hereby incorporated into the present disclosure by reference. The present disclosure also incorporates U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/681,687, entitled “DC Electrode Negative Rotating Arc Welding Method and System,” filed on Nov. 20, 2012.
A range of techniques have been developed for joining workpieces by welding operations. These include diverse processes and materials, with most modern processes involving arcs developed between a consumable or non-consumable electrode and the workpieces. The processes are often grouped in such categories as constant current processes, constant voltage processes, pulsed processes, and so forth. However, further divisions between these are common, particularly in processes that consume an electrode to add filler metal to the weld. In virtually all such cases, the process selected is highly linked to the filler material and its form, with certain processes exclusively utilizing a particular type of electrode. For example, certain types of metal inert gas (MIG) welding processes, which form part of a larger group sometimes referred to as gas metal arc welding (GMAW).
In GMAW welding, an electrode in the form of a wire is consumed by the progressing weld pool, melted by the heat of an arc between the electrode wire and the workpiece. The wire is continuously fed from a spool through welding gun where a charge is imparted to the wire to create the arc. The electrode configurations used in these processes are often referred to as either solid wire, flux cored or metal cored. Each type is considered to have distinct advantages and disadvantages over the others, and careful adjustments to the welding process and weld settings may be required to optimize their performance. For example, solid wire, while less expensive than the other types, is typically used with inert shielding gases, which can be relatively expensive. Flux cored wires may not require separate shielding gas feeds, but are more expensive than solid wires. Metal cored wires do require shielding gas, but these may be adjusted to mixes that are sometimes less expensive than those required for solid wires.
All three of these electrode types may be used with different transfer modes, referring to the mechanical and electromechanical phenomena of moving metal from the electrode tip to the progressing weld bead. A number of such transfer modes exist, such as short circuit transfer, globular transfer, spray transfer, and pulsed spray transfer. In practice, transfer physics may appear as a hybrid of these, and the actual material transfer may transition between them during welding, although the process and electrode are often selected to maintain a certain transfer mode.
As the torch progresses and consumes the wire it leaves behind a deposit of filler material between the two workpieces known as a weld bead. In general the width of the weld bead created during the transfer mode is seen as a function of several operative parameters. Depending on the fit-up between the work pieces, the weld bead width may or may not be adequate to ensure the integrity of the finished welded product. To avoid this, a welding operator must visually detect the fit-up for any workpiece gaps prior to welding and compensate manually to ensure the integrity of the welded piece. However, automated welding systems lack this intelligent consideration and simply complete welds along a predetermined path in spite of fit-up errors and gaps that may be present. This may result in weld defects, manual reworking, and ultimate rejection of finished welded parts.
Manufacturers are constantly looking for new ways to improve automated welding methods, increase the success rate of the welded pieces, and speed up the manufacturing process overall. However, current automated welding techniques coupled with the increased speed of the processes that manufacturers have come to rely on can result in many finished workpieces with poor fit-up.
The present disclosure summarizes a new technique of automatically detecting a fit-up parameter, such as workpiece gaps in real time during the welding process and accounting for the fit-up parameter by altering the width of the weld bead between the workpieces. This is accomplished utilizing a spinning arc or electrode and by automatically adjusting weld parameters such as the spin geometry of the electrode, travel speed of the welding torch, wire feed speed of the electrode, weld power applied to the electrode or one of several other parameters. The processes involved rely on a camera/laser detection device that detects gaps, or more generally, fit-up along the welding torch path between the workpieces so that the weld bead width can then be changed to accommodate the fit-up, and the appropriate amount of material added at the appropriate rate. The information from the detection device detailing the fit up is fed back to an imaging system component and a parameter determination component that allows for the determination component to determine whether adjustments to any one of the aforementioned weld parameters should be made. The result of a change in operating parameters is that the welding torch is able to alter the amount of material used to fill in the gap.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
In the illustrated embodiment, the power supply 16 will include power conversion circuitry 26 coupled to control circuitry 28 that regulates operation of the power conversion circuitry to produce power output suitable for the welding operation. The power supply may be designed and programmed to produce output power in accordance with a number of processes, welding regimes, and so forth, including constant current processes, constant voltage processes, pulsed processes, short circuit transfer processes, and so forth. In a presently contemplated embodiment, the control circuitry 28 controls the power conversion 26 to produce a DCEN (sometimes referred to as a “straight” polarity) welding regime that aids in the transfer of material from the metal cored welding wire to a progressing weld bead. However, other welding regimes may of course be used. An operator interface 30 allows a welding operator to alter both the welding process and the process settings. Moreover, in certain contemplated embodiments the operator interface may allow selection modification of certain parameters related to movement of the welding gun and the metal cored welding wire. Finally, the power supply may include valving 32 for regulating the flow of shielding gas from the gas source 18.
The wire feeder 22 will typically include control circuitry, illustrated generally by reference numeral 34, which regulates the feed of welding wire from a spool 36. The welding wire is advanced by a drive assembly 38, typically through the use of a small electric motor under the control of the control circuitry 34. Welding wire, gas, and control and feedback data may be exchanged between the wire feeder 22 and the welding gun 24 via a weld cable 40. The workpiece 14 is also coupled to the power supply by a work cable 42 to complete an electrical circuit through the electrode 44 when an electric arc is established between the electrode and the workpiece. As described more fully below, the electrode 44 advancing from the welding gun is forced to move, such as in a rotary motion as indicated by reference numeral 46.
The welding system illustrated in
The present techniques are designed for use with solid wire, flux cored or metal cored welding wires although in the present embodiment, a metal cored wire of the type illustrated in
In a presently contemplated embodiment, specific wires may be selected for use with DCEN welding regimes. As discussed more fully below, for example, it has been found that the combination of “spin-arc” movement with DCEN processes and wires such as wires comprising stabilizers, and other components, such as manganese (e.g., AWS E5.18 70C-6; and more generally, E5.18 XXC-6, where “XX” denotes tensile strength) provide excellent results. One such wire is commercially available under the name Metalloy® X-Cel™ from Hobart Brothers of Troy, Ohio. Still further, certain formulations of welding wire are believed to provide benefits beyond those obtainable with other wires. Such formulations are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,723,954, entitled Straight Polarity Metal Cored Wire, issued to Nikodym et al. on Apr. 20, 2004; U.S. Pat. No. 7,087,860, entitled Straight Polarity Metal Cored Wire, issued to Nikodym et al. on Aug. 8, 2006; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,863,538, entitled Metal-Core Gas Metal Arc Welding of Ferrous Steels with Noble Gas Shielding, issued to Barhorst et al. on Jan. 4, 2011, which are all hereby incorporated into the present disclosure by reference. Moreover, certain composition modifications may be made so such wires to enhance their performance in DCEN processes with forced movement of the arc, as discussed below.
In the present embodiment it is believed that the arc established between the metal cored welding wire and the workpieces and/or the progressing weld puddle exists only between the sheath 48 and these elements. Accordingly, unique transfer locations are established as indicated by reference numeral 98. It has been observed that resulting welds are flatter than similar welds that may be established by electrode motion using solid wire electrodes. Moreover, it is believed that enhanced penetration into the base materials is obtained as indicated by reference numeral 100. However, this should not be seen as a limitation to any particular types of wire that can be used. As discussed earlier, the present techniques can also be used with solid wire and flux cored wire in addition to metal cored wire.
Parameters that may be varied in the technique may include factors such as the rate of movement of the electrode, and the degree of movement of the electrode about a normal or central position. In particular, while the invention is certainly not limited to a circular pattern, where circular patterns have been used, it is believed that rates of rotation higher than 50 Hz, and extending to 100-120 Hz and higher may be desirable, obtaining flatter weld beads and higher deposition rates. Moreover, diameters of rotation are presently contemplated on the order of 1.5 mm, but higher diameters, such as on the order of 1.2 mm may be desired. It may also be desirable to provide electrode movement that is synchronized or coordinated with gas flow. These various parameters may assist in the penetration into the base materials, the deposition of the electrode material, the maintenance of the arc, as well as other welding parameters.
It is also believed that the weld puddle may move better with movement of the metal cored electrode, possibly due to mechanical forces (e.g., centrifugal forces) imparted on the molten ball or spray that develops at the electrode tip. The process may thus be able to run cooler than previous processes. Enhanced benefits may be offered as well on certain types of workpieces and workpiece metallurgies, particularly galvanized workpieces. Furthermore, the process may allow for less expensive shielding gasses, such as CO2 rather than Argon mixes are currently used with such welding electrodes. As discussed earlier, sold wires and flux cored wires may be used with the present techniques as well and may each bring their own advantages to the process.
In addition to the foregoing examples, it has been found that the use of DCEN welding procedures with the metal cored wired discussed above, with mechanical movement of the arc, may provide particularly good results, and may be even more attractive on certain types of workpieces (or baseplate materials). For example, the Metalloy® X-Cel™ wire mentioned above is particularly well suited to reduce spatter, while enhancing weld metal wetting (avoiding overly “crowned” beads). The use of a DCEN process, moreover, with arc movement and in combination with such wires, reduces overheating. The combination may be particularly useful for galvanized sheet material welding (e.g., in automotive applications), for coated or painted material welding, for thin steel welding (e.g., in furniture manufacturing), and so forth.
It is currently believed that welding wires suitable for these applications (corresponding generally to the X-Cel™ wire mentioned) are characterized by components that stabilize the arc (producing stable arcs with reduced spatter). For example, such stabilizers may include potassium and compounds that contribute potassium during the welding process (such as potassium feldspar, potassium titanate, potassium manganite-titanate, potassium sulfate, potassium carbonate, potassium phosphate, potassium molybdate, potassium nitrate, potassium fluosilicate, and complex oxide compounds containing potassium). Moreover, graphitic and non-graphitic carbon sources may provide stabilization by sublimating into the arc column and by rendering finer droplet metal transfer. Possible modification of existing welding wires (such as those mentioned) could include potassium from any other or more sources noted above, and a suitable carbon source, such as graphite or carbon containing iron and/or alloy powders.
Regarding the particular DCEN processes involved, these will typically be performed at currents and voltages selected based at least in part on the electrode diameter, the electrode extension (e.g., contact tip to plate), the welding position, the workpiece or base plate type and diameter, the travel speed and deposition rates, the wire feed speed, and so forth. For example, voltages ranging from 21 to 30 Volts may be suitable, with currents ranging from 150 to 450 Amps. Moreover, regarding shielding gases, appropriate gas mixes are believed to include argon and carbon dioxide, with a minimum of 75% and a maximum of 95% argon (although other amounts and combinations may be satisfactory, such as 98% argon, 2% oxygen). Still further, it is contemplated that the DCEN polarity selected may include non-pulsed and pulsed current.
In a presently contemplated embodiment, various parameters of a welding system of the type described above may be altered during welding to accommodate various fit-up issues that are detected. For example, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
The ability to detect gaps and change weld parameters as necessary is summarized in
While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3818176 | Brown | Jun 1974 | A |
4356378 | Cloos et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4441011 | Nomura et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4621185 | Brown | Nov 1986 | A |
4704513 | Sugitani | Nov 1987 | A |
4717807 | Parks | Jan 1988 | A |
4835360 | Parks | May 1989 | A |
4897523 | Parks | Jan 1990 | A |
4954691 | Parks | Sep 1990 | A |
4999478 | Bushey | Mar 1991 | A |
5030812 | Sugitani | Jul 1991 | A |
5040125 | Okumura et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5864115 | Ikeda | Jan 1999 | A |
5938955 | Ikeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5961863 | Stava | Oct 1999 | A |
5981906 | Parker | Nov 1999 | A |
6002104 | Hsu | Dec 1999 | A |
6051810 | Stava | Apr 2000 | A |
6093906 | Nicholson | Jul 2000 | A |
6172333 | Stava | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204478 | Nicholson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215100 | Stava | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6267291 | Blankenship | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6441342 | Hsu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6501049 | Stava | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510984 | Blankenship | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6536660 | Blankenship | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6708877 | Blankenship | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723954 | Nikodym | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730875 | Hsu | May 2004 | B2 |
6909066 | Zheng et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6942139 | Lipnevicius | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7032814 | Blankenship | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7067767 | Hsu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7087860 | Nikodym | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109439 | Stava | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7304269 | Fulmer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7397015 | Peters | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7683290 | Daniel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7863538 | Barhorst | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8203099 | Peters | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8283598 | Fulmer | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8373093 | Peters | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8410398 | Daniel | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445816 | Cole | May 2013 | B2 |
20030116548 | Blankenship | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040026396 | Nikodym | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050103766 | Iizuka et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050224480 | Lipnevicius | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080041834 | Nishimura | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053978 | Peters | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080245774 | Kim | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090045172 | VanErk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090321402 | Doyle | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100176104 | Peters | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100301029 | Meckler | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110155710 | Farah | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110297658 | Peters | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120061364 | Purslow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097655 | Daniel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097656 | Peters | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120152920 | Enyedy | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152921 | Peters | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130001210 | Pagano | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015170 | Peters | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043219 | Peters et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130092667 | Peters | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130112675 | Peters | May 2013 | A1 |
20130175247 | Peters | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193124 | Peters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213948 | Peters | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228555 | Peters | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264323 | Daniel | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150076119 | Hsu | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076120 | Pagano | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1212215 | Jul 2005 | CN |
4315780 | Nov 1994 | DE |
0076498 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0278620 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0402648 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0824985 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1710043 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1733838 | Dec 2006 | EP |
S58107271 | Jun 1983 | JP |
S59101280 | Jun 1984 | JP |
S644875 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1-071580 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01-91965 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01-91966 | Apr 1989 | JP |
3018474 | Jan 1991 | JP |
4187380 | Jul 1992 | JP |
4200866 | Jul 1992 | JP |
5-023856 | Feb 1993 | JP |
0523856 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05309476 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6-122074 | May 1994 | JP |
0866771 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H0866771 | Mar 1996 | JP |
9-094658 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9094658 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H0994658 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H09300072 | Nov 1997 | JP |
106004 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H106004 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10052754 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H11239878 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000301332 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-259838 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-239733 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-316264 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2010253533 | Nov 2010 | JP |
1106619 | Aug 1984 | SU |
1593831 | Sep 1990 | SU |
2012076750 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013045214 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of Japan Patent document No. 9-094,658, Nov. 2015. |
Machine translation of Japan Patent Document No. 6-122,074, Jul. 2016. |
Steve Barhorst: “Metal cored electrode basics”, The American Welder, Dec. 31, 2000, p. 1, XP002685315, American Welding Society Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.aws.org/wj/amwelder/11-00/barhorst.html [retrieved on Oct. 16, 2012]. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2012/044466 dated Nov. 5, 2012, 11 pgs. |
Iwata, Shinji, Murayama, Masatoshi, and Kojima, Yuji; “Application of Narrow Gap Welding Process with High Speed Rotating Arc to Box Column Joints of Heavy Thick Plates,” JFE Technical Report, No. 14, Dec. 2009, pp. 16-21. |
Sugitani, Y, Kobayashi, Y, and Murayama, M, “Development and application of automatic high speed rotation and arc welding,” Welding International, 5 (7), pp. 577-583, 1991. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2012/069378 dated Apr. 2, 2013, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/055090, dated, Dec. 18, 2014, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2013/052356 dated Dec. 2, 2013, 15 pgs. |
International Search Report from PCT application No. PCT/US2014/055094, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 14 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140027422 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61676563 | Jul 2012 | US |