Patent Application
20080160370
The invention relates to fuel cells and, in particular to apparatus, systems and methods for controlling the current draw from a fuel cell module.
A fuel cell is a type of electrochemical device that produces electrical energy from the stored chemical energy of reactants according to a particular electrochemical process. One example of a particular type of fuel cell is a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell that is operable to provide electrical energy to a load. Generally, a PEM fuel cell includes an anode, a cathode and thin polymer membrane arranged between the anode and cathode. Hydrogen and an oxidant are supplied as reactants for a set of complementary electrochemical reactions that yield electricity, heat and water.
The oxidant for a fuel cell can be provided by oxygen carrying ambient air. In high-pressure fuel cell systems ambient air is forced through an air compressor to increase the rate and pressure at which oxygen is delivered to the cathodes in the fuel cell stack. However, air compressors typically require a relatively large energy input to be operable. Providing this relatively large amount energy to an air compressor reduces the overall efficiency of a fuel cell module operating as a power plant.
Low-pressure fuel cell systems have been developed that have relaxed input pressure requirements with respect to the oxidant input stream. As a result, air compressors can be replaced with lower energy air blowers, which improve the overall efficiency of a fuel cell module. However, a problem common to many low-pressure fuel cell systems is that such systems typically have a slow output transient response to abrupt and/or fast load variations. For example, in a fuel cell powered vehicle rapid acceleration causes an abrupt increase in the output current drawn from a fuel cell module. This increase in output current is temporary and cannot be sustained, as it is the result of a temporary increase in the electrochemical reaction rates within the fuel cell module that rapidly deplete the available reactants from within the fuel cell module. If the reactants are not replenished at a fast enough rate the fuel cell module may stall, which may in turn damage the fuel cell module. Moreover, the transient increase in output current may be a current spike that may damage the fuel cell module. A prior known partial solution includes employing stronger air blowers capable of forcing more ambient air into the fuel cell module to reduce instances of stalling by providing more oxygen to fuel the electrochemical reactions as required. However, this solution does not effectively address the lag time between an abrupt increase in output current demand and the amount of time required to increase the electrochemical reaction rates that produce more output current. Additionally, the stronger air blowers require more energy, which in turn reduces the efficiency.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the invention there is provided an adaptive current controller, for use in a fuel cell system including a fuel cell module and an ultra-capacitor, comprising: a first electrical node connectable to the ultra-capacitor; a current limiter, connectable between the fuel cell module and the first electrical node, for adjustably limiting the output current of the fuel cell module to an upper-limit current level; and a processor, connectable to the fuel cell module and the current limiter, having a first input to receive a measurement of the output current of the fuel cell module, a second input to receive a measurement of a current demand, a first output to provide the fuel cell module with a first control signal for changing an operating level of the fuel cell module, and logic for generating the first control signal as a function of the measurements of the output current and current demand.
In some embodiments, the processor additionally comprises a second output to provide the current limiter a second control signal for changing the upper-limit current level and additional logic for generating the second control signal as a function of the operating level.
In some embodiments, the logic includes a computer readable program code means embodied thereon for (i) determining if at least one of the output current and the current demand have increased; and (ii) signaling the fuel cell module to change the operating level by increasing reactant flow through the use of the first control signal. In some more specific embodiments the computer readable program code means also includes instructions for (iii) signaling the current limiter to increase the upper-limit current level through the use of the second control signal. In some even more specific embodiments the upper-limit current level is signaled to increase if the present upper-limit current level is less than the current demand. In other even more specific embodiments, the upper-limit current level is signaled to increase as an automatic response to any increase signaled through use of the first control signal.
In some embodiments, the fuel cell module is a low-pressure fuel cell module employing an air blower to supply oxygen carrying ambient air to the fuel cell module, and wherein the first control signal is employed to change the operation of the air blower to thereby change the amount of oxygen carrying air supplied to the fuel cell module which changes the operating level of the fuel cell module.
In some embodiments, the current limiter includes an active electronic device connectable to the processor for receiving a second control signal for changing the upper-limit current level enforced by the current limiter. In some more specific embodiments, the active electronic device is a transistor. In other more specific embodiments, the current limiter includes a switching mechanism in parallel with the active electronic device for selectively shorting the fuel cell module to the first electrical node, thereby allowing the output current of the fuel cell module to bypass the active electronic device. In some even more specific embodiments the switching mechanism is connectable to the processor for receiving a third control signal for selectively shorting the electrical output of the fuel cell module to the first electrical node.
In some embodiments, the current limiter includes a series combination of a resistor and a diode connected between the fuel cell module and the first electrical node. In some more specific embodiments, the current limiter includes a switching mechanism in parallel with the series combination of the resistor and a diode for selectively shorting the fuel cell module to the first electrical node, thereby allowing the output current of the fuel cell module to bypass the series combination of the resistor and the diode. In some even more specific embodiments, the switching mechanism is connectable to the processor for receiving a third control signal for selectively shorting the electrical output of the fuel cell module to the first electrical node.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the invention there is provided a fuel cell system comprising: a fuel cell module; an ultra-capacitor pack having at least one ultra-capacitor; and an adaptive current controller having: a first electrical node connectable to the ultra-capacitor, a current limiter, coupled between the fuel cell module and the first electrical node, for adjustably limiting the output current of the fuel cell module to an upper-limit current level; and a processor, coupled to the fuel cell module and the current limiter, having a first input to receive a measurement of the output current of the fuel cell module, a second input to receive a measurement of a current demand, a first output to provide the fuel cell module with a first control signal for changing an operating level of the fuel cell module, and logic for generating the first control signal as a function of the measurements of the output current and current demand.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of operating a fuel cell system, the fuel cell system including a fuel cell module and an ultra-capacitor, the method comprising: measuring the output current of the fuel cell module and current demand; determining if at least one of the output current and current demand have changed; signaling the fuel cell module to change the reactant flow in response to a change in either of the output current and current demand.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises the steps of: determining if the current demand is greater than an upper-limit current level enforced on the fuel cell module; and increasing the upper-limit current level if the current demand is greater than the upper-limit current level. In some embodiments, if at least one of the output current and current demand have increased, the fuel cell module is signaled to increase reactant flow. In some embodiments, if both the output current and current demand have decreased, the fuel cell module is signaled to decrease reactant flow.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the invention there is provided a method of operating a fuel cell system, the fuel cell system including a fuel cell module and an ultra-capacitor, the method comprising: monitoring at least one of the voltage and charge on the ultra-capacitor; determining if the monitored at least one of the voltage and charge is below a first lower limit; one of turning-on and increasing the output current of the fuel cell module if the monitored at least one of the voltage and charge is below the first lower limit; monitoring the output current of the fuel cell module; determining if the output current is below a second lower limit; and turning-off the fuel cell module if the output current is below the second lower limit.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent, to those ordinarily skilled in the art, upon review of the following description of the specific embodiments of the invention.
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show more clearly how it may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate aspects of embodiments of the present invention and in which:
A fuel cell stack is typically made up of a number of singular fuel cells connected in series. The fuel cell stack is included in a fuel cell module that includes a suitable combination of supporting elements, collectively termed a balance-of-plant system, which is specifically configured to maintain operating parameters and functions for the fuel cell stack in steady state operation. Example functions of a balance-of-plant system include the maintenance and regulation of various pressures, temperatures and flow rates. Accordingly those skilled in the art will understand that a fuel cell module also includes a suitable combination of associated structural elements, mechanical systems, hardware, firmware and software that is employed to support the function and operation of the fuel cell module. Such items include, without limitation, piping, sensors, regulators, current collectors, seals, insulators and electromechanical controllers. Hereinafter only those items relating to aspects specific to the present invention will be described.
There are a number of different fuel cell technologies and, in general, this invention is expected to be applicable to all types of fuel cells. Very specific example embodiments of the invention have been developed for use with Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Other types of fuel cells include, without limitation, Alkaline Fuel Cells (AFC), Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFC), Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC), Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells (PAFC), Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) and Regenerative Fuel Cells (RFC).
Referring to
The fuel cell module 100 includes an anode electrode 21 and a cathode electrode 41. The anode electrode 21 includes a gas input port 22 and a gas output port 24. Similarly, the cathode electrode 41 includes a gas input port 42 and a gas output port 44. An electrolyte membrane 30 is arranged between the anode electrode 21 and the cathode electrode 41.
The fuel cell module 100 also includes a first catalyst layer 23 between the anode electrode 21 and the electrolyte membrane 30, and a second catalyst layer 43 between the cathode electrode 41 and the electrolyte membrane 30. In some embodiments the first and second catalyst layers 23, 43 are directly deposited on the anode and cathode electrodes 21, 41, respectively.
A load 115 is connectable between the anode electrode 21 and the cathode electrode 41.
In operation, hydrogen fuel is introduced into the anode electrode 21 via the gas input port 22 under some predetermined conditions. Examples of the predetermined conditions include, without limitation, factors such as flow rate, temperature, pressure, relative humidity and a mixture of the hydrogen with other gases. The hydrogen reacts electrochemically according to reaction (1), given below, in the presence of the electrolyte membrane 30 and the first catalyst layer 23.
H2H++2e− (1)
The chemical products of reaction (1) are hydrogen ions (i.e. cations) and electrons. The hydrogen ions pass through the electrolyte membrane 30 to the cathode electrode 41 while the electrons are drawn through the load 115. Excess hydrogen (sometimes in combination with other gases and/or fluids) is drawn out through the gas output port 24.
Simultaneously an oxidant, such as oxygen in the ambient air, is introduced into the cathode electrode 41 via the gas input port 42 under some predetermined conditions. Examples of the predetermined conditions include, without limitation, factors such as flow rate, temperature, pressure, relative humidity and a mixture of the oxidant with other gases. The excess gases, including the excess oxidant and the generated water are drawn out of the cathode electrode 41 through the gas output port 44. As noted above, in low-pressure fuel cell systems (modules) the oxygen is supplied via oxygen carrying ambient air that is urged into the fuel cell stack using air blowers (not shown).
The oxidant reacts electrochemically according to reaction (2), given below, in the presence of the electrolyte membrane 30 and the second catalyst layer 43.
½O2+2H++2e−H2O (2)
The chemical product of reaction (2) is water. The electrons and the ionized hydrogen atoms, produced by reaction (1) in the anode electrode 21, are electrochemically consumed in reaction (2) in the cathode electrode 41. The electrochemical reactions (1) and (2) are complementary to one another and show that for each oxygen molecule (O2) that is electrochemically consumed two hydrogen molecules (H2) are electrochemically consumed.
The rate and pressure at which the reactants, hydrogen and oxygen, are delivered into the fuel cell module 100 effects the rate at which the reactions (1) and (2) occur. The reaction rates are also affected by the current demand of the load 115. As the current demand of the load 115 increases the reactions rate for reactions (1) and (2) increases in an attempt to meet the current demand.
Increased reaction rates cannot be sustained unless the reactants are replenished at a rate that supports the consumption requirements of the fuel cell module 100. As noted above, fuel cell power generators (i.e. a fuel cell module employed to supply power to a load, as shown in
That is, fuel cells usually have an inherently limited load slew rate, which is adequate for some applications, but insufficient where close load following is desired. An example of where the inherent lack of dynamic response, of a typical fuel cell module, has proven to be insufficient is within a standalone AC power generation system in which the fuel cell module does not, or cannot possibly, receive a priori knowledge of current demand changes by the load.
In contrast, some embodiments of the present invention provide a fuel cell system with adaptive current control enabling a relatively fast dynamic response to abrupt increases in current demand whilst also providing a controlled adjustment to an operating level a fuel cell module included in the system (e.g. controlled adjustment of reactant flow(s) corresponding to a desired output current).
In an attempt to provide a fuel cell system with a faster dynamic response, a fuel cell module may be coupled with another power source exhibiting better transient behavior. Typically, batteries have been used to achieve this, but batteries have inherent drawbacks that include, for example, weight, limited durability and toxic chemicals. The use of batteries, in combination with a fuel cell module, is often not suitable for applications where the desired output of a fuel cell system would require a large number of batteries. Moreover, batteries are commonly designed to deliver a relatively low average power over a relatively long lifetime. In contrast, using batteries to provide transient responses to abrupt increases in current (or power) demand (meaning the batteries must provide short bursts of large current), often leads to accelerated degradation and a reduced lifetime of the batteries.
A better option is the use of ultra-capacitors instead of batteries. An ultra-capacitor is suitable for storing and rapidly releasing a current burst with high power density. In particular, in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention high-current and high-capacity ultra-capacitors can advantageously be combined with PEM fuel cell modules to provide a fuel cell system having a relatively fast dynamic response. However, while ultra-capacitors are suitable for delivering short current bursts, even high-capacity ultra-capacitors generally lack the storage capacity to provide current over extended transient peak loads.
Another device may be employed to deliver the elevated levels of output current from the fuel cell system during and/or after the stored capacity of the ultra-capacitor(s) diminishes. According to some embodiments of the present invention the fuel cell module is employed to deliver the elevated levels of output current that may continue to be required of the fuel cell system after an abrupt increase in current demand from the load. The fuel cell module is controlled by an adaptive current control function that manages the transient response of the fuel cell system as a whole. The adaptive current control function may be integrated into a balance-of-plant system included in the fuel cell module or it may be provided in a separate controller connectable to the fuel cell module.
A benefit of combining an ultra-capacitor pack with a fuel cell module is that the fuel cell module does not have to be designed to meet power requirements of a particular load when the peak power (or current) demands only lasts a short time. That is, if the peak power requirements occur in limited demand bursts, instead of sizing a fuel cell stack (within the module) for peak power, the fuel cell stack can be sized to provide a much smaller average power if the fuel cell module is coupled with an ultra-capacitor pack to provide output current bursts.
The following is a description of a non-limiting example provided to better illustrate benefit described in the previous paragraph. An application where a 20 kW peak load requirement is coupled to an average power draw of 2.5 kW. The ratio between the peak and average power draw is around 8:1. Such an application can be addressed with a small fuel cell provided in combination with an ultra-capacitor pack. If only fuel cell stack was employed the fuel cell stack would have to provide the peak power of 20 kW, when it was required. On the other hand, using a fuel cell stack in combination with an ultra-capacitor pack may enable the use of a fuel cell stack sized to provide only 5 kW of peak power. The ultra-capacitor pack would be sized to be able to deliver the required extra power over the short bursts as required. It should be noted here that both systems (i.e. the fuel cell module alone and the fuel cell module in combination with the ultra-capacitor pack) have the same average total power output of 2.5 kW.
As fuel cell technology is still quite expensive (even versus ultra-capacitors), the combination of fuel cells and ultra-capacitors may lower the overall cost of a fuel cell-based generator. Additionally, some ultra-capacitors are made with non-toxic materials, which makes them better suited than batteries, including toxic and/or hazardous materials, for use in environments where the potential for toxic spills and/or gas leaks must be reduced.
Many commercially available ultra-capacitors have limited voltage characteristics (e.g. around 2.5V). Subsequently, a number of ultra-capacitors need to be connected in series in order to accommodate higher voltages. A series organization of a number of ultra-capacitors is referred to as a string. For example, to accommodate a working voltage of 60V, twenty-four 2.5V ultra-capacitors organized in series can be used. Often special circuitry is required to ensure that the total voltage is evenly distributed across an ultra-capacitor string that is often provided by the manufacturers of ultra-capacitors. Additionally, if a higher capacitance is required for a given application, ultra-capacitors and/or ultra-capacitor strings can be placed electrically in parallel. Placing ultra-capacitors and/or ultra-capacitor strings in parallel within an ultra-capacitor pack, often has the additional benefit of reducing the equivalent series resistance of the ultra-capacitor pack, which in turn improves output current (and thus power) delivery capability.
Another benefit of combining an ultra-capacitor pack with a fuel cell module is that the combination can then be further combined in vehicles employing a regenerative braking system. Since fuel cell systems are usually not designed to store power from an application, another device must be used to store the energy captured during regenerative braking and/or an equivalent process. Ultra-capacitors work well in both charging and discharging modes of operation, which allows them to capture power better than batteries for the same reasons described above.
Referring to
Briefly, during operation, the load current iLOAD is the aggregate combination of the output current iFC of the fuel cell module 100 and the output current iUC of the ultra-capacitor pack 90. The symbol iLOAD is also used to represent the current demand of the load 115, since it is the load 115 that draws current from the combination of the fuel cell module 100 and the ultra-capacitor pack 90 and it is the load 115 to which the first fuel cell system responds. The adaptive current controller 70 serves to limit the (actual) output current iFC from the fuel cell module 100 drawn by the load 115 to a upper-limit current level i′FC and enables the fuel cell module 100 to controllably increase the output current iFC to meet the current demand iLOAD as required. This is especially useful for managing the transient response after the current demand iLOAD abruptly increases. During such times, the ultra capacitor pack 90 supplies the load 115 with an additional amount of current iUC in addition the limited current i′FC as described above.
Although the output current iFC of the fuel cell is limited, to an upper level of i′FC, it is not necessarily at or near the upper level i′FC during steady state operation. In fact, the output current iFC of the fuel cell module 100 may be below, and be permitted to vary in a range below, the upper level i′FC during steady state operation and/or slow transient current demand iLOAD changes, in which case the load current iLOAD includes the actual output current iFC and the output current iUC from the ultra-capacitor.
In many scenarios the output current iUC from the ultra-capacitor is zero in steady state operation. During slow or fast transient changes in the current demand iLOAD the output current from the ultra-capacitor may be a non-zero value and positive (i.e. flowing towards the load 115). The ultra-capacitor pack 90 may need to replenish the charge stored on its constituent ultra-capacitors after slow or fast transient changes in the current demand iLOAD, in which case the output current from the ultra-capacitor pack 90 may also be a non-zero negative value (i.e. flowing towards the ultra-capacitor pack 90). The current flowing to the ultra-capacitor pack 90 is provided from the fuel cell module 100, which is limited via the adaptive current controller 70. The charging process for the ultra-capacitor is also described in further detail below.
With continued reference to
The current limiter 71 is coupled in series between the current output of the fuel cell module and the first electrical node A, thereby providing a means for limiting the output current iFC of the fuel cell module 100 to the upper-limit current level i′FC. In various alternative embodiments the adaptive current controller 70 may be configured as a buck converter (similar to a high-to-low voltage DC-DC converter, a boost converter and/or a combination thereof providing a dual function (buck-boost) converter. Moreover, those skilled in the art would readily appreciate that the current limiter 71 can be placed on a positive or negative output rail/connection.
The first current sensing device 75 is coupled between the current output of the fuel cell module 100 and the current limiter 71 to sense/measure the actual output current iFC of the fuel cell module 100. The first current sensing device 75 is also coupled to the processor 73 to provide a sensed/measured value of the actual output current iFC to the processor 73. Similarly, the second current sensing device 77 is coupled between the first electrical node A and load 115 to sense/measure the load current iLOAD (i.e. the current flowing to the load 115). The second current sensing device 77 is also coupled to the processor 73 to provide a sensed/measured value of the actual load current iLOAD to the processor 73.
The processor 73 is provided with two inputs and two outputs. The two inputs include a first input for receiving a sensed/measure value of actual output current iFC from the fuel cell module and a second input for receiving a sensed/measure value of the load current iLOAD. The two outputs include a first control signal 76 and a second control signal 78 directed to the fuel cell module 100 and current limiter 71, respectively. The processor 73 also includes logic for adaptively limiting and controlling the output current iFC of the fuel cell module, especially during transient periods after abrupt increases in the current demand iLOAD from the load 115.
As described briefly above in operation the output current iFC of the fuel cell module 100 is initially limited immediately following an abrupt increase in the current demand iLOAD from the load 115, during which time the ultra-capacitor pack 90 automatically meets the initial transient demand by supplying iUC. Simultaneously, the adaptive current controller 70 enables the fuel cell module 100 to controllably increase the fuel cell module 100 output current iFC during the duration where the current burst demanded by the load 115 is initially met by ultra-capacitor pack 90.
The current sensing devices 75 and 77 sense/measure the output current iFC and the current demand iLOAD, and provide the respective measured values to the processor 73. The processor 73 uses the measured current values to produce the first and second control signals 76 and 78.
The first control signal 76 is used to change the output current iFC provided by the fuel cell module 100. If the current demand iLOAD remains elevated after the abrupt change the processor 73 signals the fuel cell module 100 to increase the reaction rate of reactions (1) and (2), thereby causing the fuel cell module 100 to produce more current (i.e. increase iFC). On the other hand, the change in current demand iLOAD may have been negative and the current demand iLOAD may continue to remain lower than before the abrupt change; in which case the processor 73 signals the fuel cell module 100 to decrease the reaction rate of reactions (1) and (2), thereby causing the fuel cell module 100 to produce less current (i.e. decrease iFC). In some embodiments the fuel cell module 100 responds to the first control signal 76 by changing the operation of one or more air blowers to either reduce or increase the flow of oxygen into the cathode of the fuel cell module 100, as determined by the processor 73.
Additionally, in some embodiments the second control signal 78 is used to change the upper-limit current level i′FC enforced by the current limiter. As the output current iFC may be increased, as determined by the processor 73, the upper-limit current level i′FC may also have to be adjusted to allow the increased output current iFC to reach the first electrical node A where (if iFC>iLOAD) the extra current can be diverted to the ultra-capacitor pack 90 and/or the load 115 as required.
Referring to
In contrast, if a fuel cell module is used without ultra-capacitors, the fuel cell module must be able to collect information about the current demand iLOAD and try to predict increases in demand before they occur. If the predictions could actually be made the fuel cell module can increase the reactant flow in advance of the increases in demand. As this happens, the fuel cell module generates a feedback signal to indicate how much extra current could be safely drawn. However, there is a delay from increasing the reactant flow to the time when the additional current is available, which means that the overall system is vulnerable to potentially damaging spikes in current demand from the load.
The first fuel cell system including the adaptive current control is not as vulnerable to potentially damaging spikes in current demand iLOAD since the fuel cell module 100 is protected by the current limiter 71 and the ultra-capacitor pack 90 is provided to respond to abrupt changes in current demand iLOAD. Accordingly, the first fuel cell system may be substantially easier to integrate into various applications (e.g. placement into vehicles) as the overall system control does not need to predict changes in current demand iLOAD and/or handle complex data transfer handshaking.
That is, a fuel cell system in accordance with some embodiments of the invention have a relatively low-complexity interface to an application (e.g. for use as a power plant for a vehicle). Unlike other fuel cell systems, which require complex handshaking with the application in order to ensure that reactants flow is adequately adjusted to provide a desired output current without starving the fuel cell module, some fuel cell systems in accordance with some embodiments of the invention do not need a complex system controller. As a result, a fuel cell system, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, may run close to pure load following conditions.
The adaptive current control 70 is also useful when the first fuel cell system is initially turned on (i.e. powered-up) and when the ultra-capacitor pack 90 needs to be recharged. When the first fuel cell system is not operating to produce power, it is possible that the ultra-capacitor pack 90 is almost completely discharged. Accordingly, when the first fuel cell system is turned-on the variation of voltage (dV/dT) may be quite high, which creates a fairly large current through the ultra-capacitor pack 90. Without current limiting, the amount of current being drawn from the fuel cell module 100 by the ultra-capacitor pack 90 may exceed the capability of the fuel cell module 100 and cause an emergency shutdown to be initiated by a safety control sub-system included in the balance-of-plant system of the fuel cell module 100.
The reason for this is due to the current and voltage characteristics of capacitors, when subjected to a change in voltage, as described by the following equations:
Q=CV (3)
I=C dV/dT (4)
E=_CV2 (5)
In the above equations Q represents a capacitor charge (in Coulombs), C is the capacitance (in Farads), V is the voltage (in Volts) across the capacitor, E corresponds to the energy stored in the capacitor and I is the resulting current flowing through the capacitor when its voltage varies over time (dV/dT). Ultra-capacitors used in combination with fuel cell modules are typically sized to provide high current during a transient response. Subsequently, for example, a change of 10 V/s on a 20F ultra-capacitor pack can result in a 200A current draw from the fuel cell module. A typical fuel cell module cannot likely deliver such a large current during a power-up phase of operation, so there is a need to use a current limiting scheme. To address this issue, in some embodiments of the invention the adaptive current controller 70 controllably and progressively increases the voltage across the ultra-capacitor pack 90, thereby limiting the current drawn from the fuel cell module 100. To that end, the processor 73, within the adaptive current controller 70, operates as described above. Once the ultra-capacitor pack 90 is charged, the voltage across the ultra-capacitor pack will normally follow the voltage across the fuel cell module 100 during steady state operation.
The current limiter 71, as illustrated in
The current limiter 71 also includes first and second diodes 201 and 203 and an inductor 205. The first diode 201 serves to limit the reverse voltage across the current-limiting power transistor 200. The second diode 203 is placed in series with the inductor 205 between the current-limiting power transistor 200 and an end of the ultra-capacitor pack 90. The second diode 203 is employed to prevent a reverse current to the fuel cell model 100 and the inductor 205 serves to limit the current ripple.
The contactors 207a,b serve to selectively couple and decouple the load 115 from the remainder of the second fuel cell system. In doing so, the contactors 207a,b enable a simple method of avoiding current demand spikes at start-up. During start-up, the contactors 207a,b are opened and the current is limited by carefully adjusting the flow of reactants. When a desired open circuit voltage across the ultra-capacitor pack 90 is reached the contactors 207a,b can be closed coupling the load to the rest of the fuel cell system.
The current limiter 71, as illustrated in
During steady state operation the contactor 84 is closed shorting the fuel cell module 100 to the first electrical node A and thereby reducing electrical losses that would otherwise occur through the current-limiting resistor 83 and the diode 85. When the processor 73 detects that the current demand iLOAD has changed (via measurements provided from the current sensing device 77) the processor 73 changes the second control signal 78 to open the contactor 84 re-routing the output current iFC through the current-limiting resistor 83 and the diode 85, and thereby protecting the fuel cell module 100.
Yet another variation of this configuration is possible. Additionally and/or alternatively, a current-limiting active device (e.g. an adjustable diode, transistor, etc.) can be put in the first path with the current-limiting resistor 83 and the diode 85 or in place of the current-limiting resistor 83 and the diode 85.
Shorting the fuel cell module 100 and ultra-capacitor pack 90 together by the use of the contactor 84 limits the overloading benefits by imposing a system voltage range that matches the voltage range of the fuel cell module 100. Since ultra-capacitor voltage is directly linked to the amount of energy that can be stored (see equation above), limiting the voltage range across the ultra-capacitor also limits the peak energy delivery capability, and therefore power delivery capability.
In addition to the features described with reference to
The outputs of the current limiters 71a, 71b, 71c are coupled through a summation node (SUM) 60. In some embodiments the SUM 60 is controlled by the processor 73 to deliver a suitable combination of currents from the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c to the first electrical node A, which is fixedly or selectively coupled to a load (not shown). In other embodiments the SUM 60 is controlled by a system controller (not shown) or a combination of the system controller and the processor 73.
Additionally, in operation each of the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c can be operated to provide a different amount of current and/or no current at all. That is, one or more of the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c may be in an idle mode, serving as a hot standby in the event of a failure of the other fuel cell modules, where process fluids are circulated and humidification and heating/cooling are employed to keep the fuel cell module at working temperature. This type of configuration has benefit in scenarios where power supply cannot be interrupted and/or where the load may demand current that cannot be supplied by one of the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c alone. This configuration may also be used to provide load balancing, where two or more fuel cell modules are used in parallel in respective peak efficiency modes. Accordingly, of the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c can be controlled by a master controller (not shown) to efficiently employ reactant supplies for a desired output.
In another mode of operation one, two or all of the fuel cell modules 100a, 100b, 100c can be completely shut down to avoid idling where efficiency is typically lowest. With additional reference to
Starting at step 8-1, the sensing devices measuring the output current iFC (of the fuel cell module) and the current demand iLOAD are polled. At step 8-1, it is determined whether or not the output current iFC or the current demand iLOAD have changed. If neither of the two currents have changed (no path, step 8-2) then step 8-1 is repeated and the sensing devices measuring the output current iFC (of the fuel cell module) and the current demand iLOAD are polled again to receive updated measurements. In some embodiments, there is an enforced delay between polling times. On the other hand, if one of the two currents iFC and iLOAD has changed (yes path, step 8-2), then at step 8-3 the fuel cell module is signaled to increase reactant flow to follow the change detected at step 8-2.
Following step 8-3, it is determined whether or not the current demand iLOAD is greater than the present upper-limit current level i′FC imposed on the fuel cell module by a current limiter. If the current demand iLOAD is not greater than the present upper-limit current level i′FC (no path, step 8-4), then step 8-1 is repeated and the sensing devices measuring the output current iFC (of the fuel cell module) and the current demand iLOAD are polled again to receive updated measurements. On the other hand, if the current demand iLOAD is greater than the present upper-limit current level i′FC (yes path, step 8-4) the current limiter is signaled to increase the value of the upper-limit current level i′FC. In some embodiments the value of the increase is a preset amount, whereas in other embodiments the value of the increase is further determined each time the upper-limit current level i′FC is to be increased. Conversely, the upper-limit current level i′FC may be decreased in response to diminishing current demand iLOAD.
Additionally and/or alternatively, the output current iFC (of the fuel cell module), or voltage, can be managed between respective floor and ceiling values (i.e. lower and upper levels) to further manage the charge stored on an ultra-capacitor pack.
Starting at step 9-1, the voltage and/or charge on an ultra-capacitor pack is measured by polling a sensing device connected to measure the voltage and/or charge. At step 9-2, it is determined whether or not the voltage and/or charge is below a lower limit. If the voltage and/or charge is not below the lower limit (no path, step 9-2), then step 9-1 is repeated and the voltage and/or charge is measured again. In some embodiments, there is an enforced delay between polling times. On the other hand, if the voltage and/or charge is below the lower limit (yes path, step 9-2), then at step 9-3 the fuel cell module is signaled to turn on and/or increase reactant flow to recharge the ultra-capacitor pack and/or follow the current demand iLOAD of the load.
Following step 9-3, at step 9-4 the output current iFC of the fuel cell module is monitored by polling a sensing device employed to measure the output current iFC. At step 9-5, it is determined whether or not the output current iFC is below a lower limit (as described above with reference to
While the above description provides example embodiments, it will be appreciated that the present invention is susceptible to modification and change without departing from the fair meaning and scope of the accompanying claims. Accordingly, what has been described is merely illustrative of the application of aspects of embodiments of the invention. Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CA2005/001072 | 7/12/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/7/2006 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60586709 | Jul 2004 | US |
