The present invention relates generally to the field of communications, and more particularly to high-speed electronic signaling within and between integrated circuit devices.
Communication channels typically exhibit low pass filter effects that disproportionately attenuate high-frequency signal components. These effects can vary from one channel to the next, and can vary over time in a given channel. Adaptive receive equalization schemes are therefore used in high-speed communication links to compensate for all or part of the distortion imposed by the channel.
The amount of channel-induced distortion appearing on any particular bit in a serial data signal is pattern dependent. This pattern dependency owes to the fact that different data patterns have different spectral content, and are thus affected differently by the channel transfer function. As a first-order approximation for a typical channel, the higher the frequency, the greater the attenuation.
Equalization refers generally to processes for emphasizing or attenuating a selected frequency or frequencies of a signal, often to compensate for frequency-specific attenuation of the signal. Equalization schemes can be “adaptive,” in which case the equalization parameters may be dynamically adjusted to account for variables that affect the communication channel, including process variations and fluctuations in temperature, supply voltage, and the noise environment. Many of these adaptive equalization schemes require sensitive analog circuitry and/or additional samplers that significantly increase system complexity, implementation difficulty, and power requirements. There is therefore a need for efficient adaptive receiver equalization systems and methods that are more easily implemented and verified, with reduced power penalty.
The subject matter disclosed is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Receiver 1300 includes an equalizer 1325 that equalizes a differential input data signal Vin_p/Vin_n to produce an equalized signal VEQ.
Receiver 100 includes an equalizer 105 that equalizes an input data signal VIN from a receive port 107 to produce an equalized data signal VEQ on a single-ended or differential equalizer output port. (As with other designations herein, VIN and VEQ refer both to signals and their corresponding ports, lines, or nodes; whether a given designation refers to a signal, node, or port will be clear from the context.) Equalizer 105 adjusts the magnitude (e.g., voltage and/or current) of at least some data symbols in data signal VIN to account for differences in the spectral content of the symbols and symbol patterns. In some embodiments, equalizer 105 selectively adjusts the voltage amplitude of at least some of the data symbols in data signal VIN, whereas in other embodiments equalizer 105 selectively adjusts the current used to express at least some of the data symbols in data signal VIN. Assuming the associated channel exhibits a low-pass filter effect, equalizer 105 amplifies input data signal VIN using a range of amplification factors, with higher frequency components of VIN being treated to higher amplification factors. In that case, the degree to which equalizer 105 amplifies higher frequency signals relative to lower frequency signals can be adjusted via an equalizer control port 106 coupled to control bus EQ[3:0].
Each of a data sampler 110 and an edge sampler 115 samples the equalized data signal VEQ from equalizer 105 in time with respective data and edge clocks CKD and CKE, which clock recovery circuitry 117 derives from a local bit-rate reference clock signal CKREF. Data sampler 110 issues a series of data samples on a sampler output port SA_D[C], where “C” is for “current” sample, whereas edge sampler 115 issues a series of edge samples on a second sampler output port SA_EDGE.
Equalizer control circuitry 120 is coupled to the control port of equalizer 105, and to the outputs of data and edge samplers 110 and 115 via a retimer 122 that re-times both edge and data samples into the CKD time domain. The retimed versions of the data and edge samples are conveyed on respective data and edge ports D[C] and EDGE. As detailed below, control circuitry 120 determines whether edge transitions associated with specific incoming data patterns are early or late with respect to edge clock CKE. Control circuitry 120 then adjusts equalizer 105 to align those edge transitions with the edge clock. To this end, control circuitry 120 includes a bit correlator 130 that issues a match signal MATCH in response to a specific data pattern or patterns, a phase detector 135 that issues relative-timing signals L (late) and E (early) indicative of whether edge transitions of incoming bits are late or early, respectively, with respect to edge clock CKE, and some equalization logic 140 that issues control settings to equalizer 105 in response to the relative-timing signals and the match signal. The early and late signals E and L from corresponding relative-timing ports of phase detector 135 are also conveyed to clock recovery circuitry 117 for use in aligning edge and data clock signals CKE and CKD with the incoming data signal. Phase detector 135 and clock recovery circuitry 117 may be part of conventional clock and data recovery (CDR) circuitry employed by receiver 100. Other embodiments employ an analog phase detector to provide the early/late determination. In the depicted embodiment, a clock signal CAP to bit correlator 130, phase detector 135, and equalization logic 140 is a gated version of signal CKD, which allows the CDR and equalizer control circuitry to be run in a burst-mode to save power. The percentage of time the signal CAP is enabled may depend upon the CDR bandwidth requirements of the system.
Phase detector 135, which may be an Alexander (bang-bang) phase detector, logically combines the current data sample D[C], the prior data sample D[P], and the edge sample EDGE between the current and prior data samples to determine whether the data edge between the current and prior data samples is early or late with respect to edge clock CKE. Alexander phase detectors are well known to those of skill in the art, so a detailed discussion is omitted. Briefly, samples D[C], D[P], and EDGE are re-timed versions of the incoming data signal. Samples D[C] and D[P] are one bit period (one unit interval) apart, and sample EDGE is sampled at half the bit period between samples D[C] and DM. If the current and prior samples D[C] and D[P] are the same (e.g., both represent logic one), then no transition has occurred and there is no “edge” to detect. In that case, the outputs E and L of phase detector 135 are both zero. If the current and prior samples D[C] and D[P] are different, however, then the edge sample EDGE is compared with the current and prior samples D[C] and D[P]: if sample EDGE equals prior sample D[P], then late signal L is asserted; and if sample EDGE equals current sample D[C], then the early signal E is asserted. In this disclosure, a “late” data edge arrives late with respect to the sampling clock, whereas an “early” data edge arrives early with respect to the sampling clock.
Bit correlator 130 employs a series of flip-flops and a pattern mask 150 to determine whether the series of symbols expressed by the incoming data signal matches a specified pattern. Bit correlator 130 requires an exact match, but this may not be required in every embodiment. For example, some embodiments allow the user to specify a mask bit pattern that allows the exclusion of bit positions within the pattern from being included in identifying matches.
Beginning at step 405, receiver 100 begins receiving data. The flip-flops within bit correlator 130 provide the incoming data patterns to pattern mask 150. Per decision 410, in the event the incoming data matches the selected pattern (11101), bit correlator 130 asserts match signal MATCH; otherwise, control circuitry 120 simply awaits the next data bit.
If ever the incoming data and mask bits do match, equalization logic 140 considers the early and late signals L and E from phase detector 135 (decisions 415 and 420). If the current and prior data symbols D[C] and D[P] are the same, there is no edge to be late or early, so decisions 415 and 420 merely return the flow to step 405 to await the next data sample. If late signal L is asserted, however, equalization logic 140 increments a counter (step 430) that filters the “yes” signals from decision 415. If the counter of step 430 saturates high (decision 435), equalization logic 140 resets the counter and decrements equalization control signal EQ[3:0] on the like-named control bus (step 440) to reduce the amplification factor imposed on high-frequency signal components.
If late signal L is not asserted for decision 415, the process flow moves to decision 420 for consideration of early signal E. If early signal E is asserted, equalization logic 140 decrements the counter noted above in connection with step 430 (step 445). If the counter saturates low (decision 450), equalization logic 140 resets the counter and increments equalization control signal EQ[3:0] (step 455) to increase the amplification factor imposed on high-frequency signal components. Of interest, the flow should not proceed from decision 420 directly to block 405 in the example in which a match requires pattern (11101) because that pattern always includes a transition, zero-to-one, between the last two bits.
Turning to the example of
Applicant has discovered that, in certain circumstances, equalizing incoming signals to minimize the timing error associated with the worst-case data pattern or patterns may provide suitable timing for less-sensitive data patterns. Setting the equalizer based upon the worst-case data pattern or patterns therefore causes incoming signals associated with various data patterns to exhibit coincident zero crossings, as is desired.
In the example of
Receiver 710 includes an equalizer 725 that equalizes data signal Vin to produce an equalized data signal VEQ. Equalizer 725 adjusts the magnitude of at least some data symbols in data signal VIN. In one embodiment, equalizer 725 amplifies signal VIN using a range of amplification factors, with higher frequency components being treated to higher amplification factors to, for example, compensate for the low-pass nature of channel 715. The degree to which equalizer 725 amplifies higher frequency signals relative to lower frequency signals can be adjusted via an equalizer control bus EQ[3:0]. In this example, a control port of equalizer 725 receives analog control signals derived from signal EQ[3:0] by a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 727, though equalizer 725 may respond directly to digital signals in other embodiments.
In support of DDR operation, two data samplers 730 and 732 sample odd and even data symbols using data clocks CK0 and CK180, respectively, to produce corresponding odd and even data samples D0 and D1. A pair of edge samplers 735 and 737 likewise sample odd and even edges using edge clocks CK90 and CK270, respectively, to produce odd and even edge samples E0 and E1. A deserializer 740 combines the odd and even data samples into N+1 bit data words DA[N:0], and further combines the odd and even edge samples into N+1 bit edge words ED[N:0]. Data words DA[N:0] are conveyed into the integrated circuit as the received data via a register 742. For both edge and data samples, the bit “N” corresponds to the eldest serial sample and the bit “0” refers to the most recent.
Deserializer 740 is timed, in this embodiment, using a data clock signal DCLK and a word-clock signal WDCLK. Signal DCLK is derived from the same DDR clock source used to generate clock signals CK0, CK90, CK180, and CK270. The purpose of signal DCLK is to retime all the data and edge samples into the same time domain and to operate the deserializer. Data is clocked out of deserializer 740 using word-clock signal WDCLK. Register 742 downstream from deserializer 740 is also timed to word-clock signal WDCLK.
Receiver 710 includes equalizer control circuitry 745 that adjusts equalization control signal EQ[3:0] based upon phase information derived from data and edge words DA[N:0] and ED[N:0] for specific data patterns. In accordance with the depicted embodiment, phase information is only considered when the incoming data word exhibits one or more particular data patterns PATT[4:0]. As in the foregoing examples, the data pattern or patterns may be selected such that correcting for phase error associated the selected pattern or patterns produces a suitable equalization setting for all expected data patterns.
Control circuitry 745 includes an Alexander phase detector 750, a pattern mask 755, and equalization control logic 760. Phase detector 750 identifies data edges by comparing adjacent data samples and, where edges occur, compares the sampled edge between the adjacent samples to determine whether the edge is early or late. Phase detector 750 then provides, based upon these determinations, an N-bit late word LATE[N−1:0] and an N-bit early word EARLY[N−1:0]. Pattern mask 755 compares each five-bit subset of each data word DA[N:0] with five-bit pattern PATT[4:0] and identifies matches by asserting signal MATCH. Control logic 760 then adjusts equalization control signal EQ[3:0] when a counter (not shown) saturates high or low, thus indicating that match signal MATCH is occurring more frequently in conjunction with either early signals or late signals. Phase detector 750 may be part of the clock-recovery circuitry (not shown) used to derive clock signals CK0, CK90, CK180, and CK270. The selected pattern is loaded via a pattern bus PATT[4:0] upon assertion of a load signal PLOAD.
Equalization logic 760 includes early and late registers 815 and 820, into which are loaded N early bits and N late bits, respectively. As with data word register 800, the early and late bits are loaded and shifted when the signals LOAD and SHIFT are asserted. The most recent early and late bits in respective registers 815 and 820 output as early and late signals EARLY and LATE, respectively.
Equalization logic 760 additionally includes an XOR gate 825, a NAND gate 830, an AND gate 835, a saturation counter 840, and a counter 845. XOR gate 825 asserts a phase error signal PH_ERR when either of the early and late signals is asserted. AND gate 835 asserts an enable signal ENAB when pattern mask 755 identifies a match and the early and late registers indicate a phase error. The enable signal ENAB allows saturation counter 840 to increment or decrement. NAND gate 830 combines the early and late signals EARLY and LATE such that signal UPDN is asserted when early signal EARLY is asserted and late signal LATE is deasserted, and is deasserted when early signal EARLY is deasserted and late signal LATE is asserted. Asserting (de-asserting) signal UPDN causes counter 840 to increment (decrement) when enabled. Counter 840 thus counts up or down, depending upon the timing of a zero crossing, when the pattern of received data matches a selected pattern.
The first half of waveform 905 is alternating ones and zeros, and the first five zero crossings 910 are close to the corresponding rising edges of clock signal CKE. The sampled zero crossings for such relatively symmetrical waveforms can be expected to fluctuate between early and late due to random and periodic jitter sources. The latter half of waveform 905 exhibits a series of ones with an intervening zero, which produces a pair of edges for which the zero crossings 915 and 920 are relatively far from the corresponding edges of clock signal CKE. The outputs of phase detector 750 (
The following Table 1 illustrates the examination of the data word DA[9:0]=(0101011101) of
0101011101
Each remaining five-bit series is likewise examined, with the shift from one series to the next taking place upon assertion of shift signal SHIFT. In practice, the data bits may be shifted out of register 800 one bit at a time to present each successive bit series to pattern matching logic 805. The first three early and late bits need not be considered, and may therefore be discarded. The early and late bits may be shifted out of their respective registers 815 and 820 one bit at a time, again upon assertion of signal SHIFT, to present the appropriate early and late bits EARLY and LATE for consideration in connection with the corresponding bit pattern. The five series numbered one through five do not result in pattern matches, so the count in counter 840 is unaffected despite the value of signal UPDN.
Shifting of the mask pattern is optional. Other embodiments match all or a subset of captured data words, ignoring unconsidered bits. In the foregoing embodiments, the shifting increases the amount of early/late information obtained for a given quantity of sample data and edge data.
Block 1015 represents the receipt of incoming data and edge samples. As noted above in connection with
If phase error signal PH_ERR is asserted, then the sampled edge was determined to be either early or late. In decision 1025, if early the zero crossing was determined to be early (i.e., if signal EARLY is asserted), then saturation counter 840 is incremented (step 1030). If the phase error is not due to an early signal, than late signal LATE was asserted, in which case saturation counter 840 is decremented (step 1035).
Considering next decision 1040, saturation counter 840 may reach the maximum count upon incrementing. If so, counter 840 asserts signal SAT_HI, the upper threshold, in which case equalization control logic 845 increments equalization control signal EQ[3:0] and counter 840 is reset to the midrange (steps 1042 and 1007). If counter 840 is not saturated, then the process returns to block 1015 for consideration of the next five-bit series of incoming data. Decision 1045 is similar to decision 1040, except that counter 845 is decremented (step 1050) if counter 840 asserts signal SAT_LO, the lower threshold. The upper and lower thresholds of saturation counter 840 may be adjusted in some embodiments.
The phase detector will periodically indicate early and late edges even when the equalization setting is optimal for a given operational environment. Assuming proper data alignment, the resulting early and late signals will tend to cancel each other over time. That is, counter 840 will drift between the upper and lower threshold levels without asserting either of signals SAT_HI or SAT_LO. When the edges of the incoming data signal are consistently misaligned with the edge clock, however, the errors will accumulate over time and will consequently produce appropriate counteracting adjustments to equalization control signal EQ[3:0]. Saturation counter 840 and equalization control logic 845 thus act as a low-pass filter for updates to the equalization settings.
The two patterns of
Returning to the example of
In support of DDR operation, two data samplers 1330 and 1332 sample odd and even data symbols using data clocks CK0 and CK180, respectively, to produce corresponding odd and even data samples D0 and D1. A pair of edge samplers 1335 and 1337 likewise sample odd and even edges using edge clocks CK90 and CK270, respectively, to produce odd and even edge samples E0 and E1. A pair of deserializers 1340 and 1345 combine the odd and even data samples into N+1 bit data words DA[N:0], and further combine the odd and even edge samples into N+1 bit edge words ED[N:0]. Data words DA[N:0] are conveyed into the integrated circuit as the received data.
Receiver 1300 includes adaptation control circuitry 1350 that adjusts equalization control signal EQ[3:0] based upon phase information derived from data and edge words DA[N:0] and ED[N:0]. Control circuitry 1350 includes a state machine 1355, a pattern register 1360, a data-sample register 1363, an edge-sample register 1365, and an equalization-setting register 1370. Adaptation control circuitry 1350 employs these elements to provide the functionality of control circuitry 745 of
In a typical example, a set of patterns for a low-pass channel is selected to reduce timing error in the rising and falling edges of a “lone 1” and “lone 0,” such as those associated with the patterns (00001), (11110), (00010), and (11101). The number of bits in the selected patterns may be determined by the magnitude of attenuation at half of the bit frequency relative to the attenuation at DC: in general, more attenuation requires more pattern bits. For example, five-bit patterns may be appropriate for an attenuation of about −10 dB at half of the bit frequency relative to DC. Other patterns or sets of patterns may be required by systems with fixed training sequences or encodings, or by systems that employ channels with more complicated frequency responses. An appropriate set of patterns can be determined for a range of complex channels through simulation; alternatively, an in-situ exploration of the pattern space can be performed once the hardware is available. In the present example, all five-bit patterns could be considered, giving up to 32 patterns.
To begin with, a first of the selected patterns is loaded from the pattern bus PATT[4:0] into pattern register 810 upon the assertion of a pattern-load signal PLOAD. One of counters 1410-1413 is then selected by asserting one bit of select signal CSEL[3:0]. XOR 825 qualifies the resulting MATCH signals by requiring that only one of the EARLY or LATE signals must be asserted for a legal match. NAND gate 830 asserts the signal UPDN to instruct the selected counter to increment or decrement when ENAB is asserted. For a given pattern match, if LATE=1 and EARLY=0, the selected counter will decrement when count signal CNT is toggled; if LATE=0 and EARLY=1, the selected counter will increment when count signal CNT is toggled.
In this example, we wish to equalize the incoming signal using four patterns (00001), (11110), (11101), and (00010). First, pattern (00001) is loaded into pattern register 810, and select signal CSEL[3:0] is set to (0001) to select saturation counter 1410. All five-bit patterns in D[N:0] from register 800 are sequentially compared against the stored match pattern in register 810 by toggling SHIFT. Count signal CNT is toggled each time the pattern is shifted, to record whether early signal EARLY or late signal LATE is asserted for the selected pattern.
Next, the pattern (11110) is loaded into pattern register 810 and select signal CSEL[3:0] is set to (0010) to select counter 1411. The pattern matching process is then repeated as described above. Likewise, the process is repeated for pattern (11101) and counter 1412 and pattern (00010) and counter 1413. Over time, counters 1410-1413 will thus record the correlation of early and late indications for the four target patterns.
When high-frequency components of a data signal are attenuated more than the low-frequency components, counters 1410 and 1411 will tend to saturate low, and counters 1412 and 1413 will tend to saturate high. Such a state indicates that the equalizer should boost the high-frequency gain relative to the low-frequency gain. Conversely, when the low-frequency components of a data signal are attenuated more than the high-frequency components, counters 1410 and 1411 will tend to saturate high, and counters 1412 and 1413 will tend to saturate low. Such a state indicates that the equalizer should reduce the high-frequency gain relative to the low-frequency gain.
Counters 1410-1413 indicate their respective states to a decoder 1420 via respective lines HI_ #and LO_ #. Adjustment of equalization signal EQ[3:0], and consequently the equalizer, based on the state of saturating counter outputs is controlled by a counter decode block 1420. Block 1420 takes as inputs an 8-bit word constructed from the HI and LO outputs from the four saturating counters 1410-1413 and a control word EQ_CNTL[7:0]. When the word from counters 1410-1413 equals control word EQ_CNTL[7:0], decoder 1420 asserts up/down signal UP/DN and enable signal EQEN, causing an equalization set counter 1425 to increment the binary value EQ[3:0] on the falling edge of count signal CNT. When the word from counters 1410-1413 equals the inversion of control word EQ_CNTL[7:0], decoder 1420 deasserts up/down signal UP/DN and asserts enable signal EQEN, causing counter 1425 to decrement EQ[3:0] on the falling edge of count signal CNT. An AND gate 1430 generates a reset pulse CNT RESET whenever the counter 1425 changes state. This pulse resets the saturating counters to their central values, making them ready to measure the effect of the equalization adjustment.
Beginning with step 1505, registers 1410-1413 and 1425 are each set to the middle of their ranges and equalization control word EQ_CNTL[7:0] is set to some desired value. Next, at step 1510, the series pointer (not shown) is set to (000) and pattern-select signal CSEL[3:0] is set to (0001). The series pointer selects the first of six five-bit series to be selected as bits D[4:0] from register 800. Examples of these series are detailed above in connection with Table 1. Setting select signal CSEL[3:0] to (0001) enables saturation counter 1410. The series pointer may encode an offset for the selection of the five-bit series from register 800, treating register 800 like a memory element rather than a shift register. In some embodiments, register 800 could be a bank of random-access memory (RAM).
In step 1515 register 800 captures N data bits, early register 815 captures N−1 early bits, and late register 820 captures N−1 late bits, where N is e.g. ten. Decision 1520 next considers whether the data in register 800 has been compared with all of the data patterns under consideration, four in the present example. As no patterns have yet to be considered, the flow passes to step 1525 in which one of the four selected patterns is loaded into pattern register 810. Recalling that, from step 1510, the series pointer is selecting the first (most recent) five-bit series in register 800, decision 1530 determines whether that five-bit series matches the selected pattern and the registers 815 and 820 are producing just one early or late signal. If not, the process moves to decision 1535 to determine whether all of the five-bit series in register 800 have been considered. In this example in which there are six such series to be considered, decision 1535 increments the series pointer (step 1545) so long as the series pointer is less than (101). If all the series have been considered, however, the process moves to step 1540 to enable the next one of saturation counters 1410-1413 in anticipation of comparing the captured data word to another mask pattern.
Returning to decision 1530 and assuming a match with attending phase error, the process moves to decision 1550. AND gate 830 drives signal UPDN high to increment the enabled one of saturation counters 1410-1413 (step 1555) if signals EARLY and LATE indicate receipt of an early edge; conversely, AND gate 830 drives signal UPDN low to decrement the enabled one of saturation counters 1410-1413 (step 1560) if signals EARLY and LATE indicate receipt of a late edge.
Over time, the state of saturation counters 1410-1413 may match the selected equalization-control word EQ_CNTL[7:0]. Per decision 1565, such a match causes register 1425 to increment the value of signal EQ[3:0] (step 1570). Absent such a match, per decision 1575, the state of the saturation counters is compared with the inverse of the selected equalization-control word EQ_CNTL[7:0], which may be denoted/EQ_CNTL[7:0]. Should such a match occur, register 1425 decrements the value of signal EQ[3:0] (step 1580). If neither of decisions 1565 and 1575 identifies a match the process moves to decision 1535. If a match is noted, however, the resulting increment or decrement is followed by toggling signal CNT_RST high then low (step 1585), which returns each of saturation counters 1410-1413 to their midrange value.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks may be shown or described as multi-conductor or single conductor signal lines. Each of the multi-conductor signal lines may alternatively be single-conductor signal lines, and each of the single-conductor signal lines may alternatively be multi-conductor signal lines. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. As another example, circuits described or depicted as including metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors may alternatively be implemented using bipolar technology or any other technology in which a signal-controlled current flow may be achieved. With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or de-asserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is de-asserted. In any case, whether a given signal is an active low or an active high will be evident to those of skill in the art.
An output of a process for designing an integrated circuit, or a portion of an integrated circuit, comprising one or more of the circuits described herein may be a computer-readable medium such as, for example, a magnetic tape or an optical or magnetic disk. The computer-readable medium may be encoded with data structures or other information describing circuitry that may be physically instantiated as an integrated circuit or portion of an integrated circuit. Although various formats may be used for such encoding, these data structures are commonly written in Caltech Intermediate Format (CIF), Calma GDS II Stream Format (GDSII), or Electronic Design Interchange Format (EDIF). Those of skill in the art of integrated circuit design can develop such data structures from schematic diagrams of the type detailed above and the corresponding descriptions and encode the data structures on computer readable medium. Those of skill in the art of integrated circuit fabrication can use such encoded data to fabricate integrated circuits comprising one or more of the circuits described herein.
While the present invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments, variations of these embodiments will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art. As examples,
Moreover, some components are shown directly connected to one another while others are shown connected via intermediate components. In each instance the method of interconnection, or “coupling,” establishes some desired electrical communication between two or more circuit nodes, or terminals. Such coupling may often be accomplished using a number of circuit configurations, as will be understood by those of skill in the art. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the foregoing description. Only those claims specifically reciting “means for” or “step for” should be construed in the manner required under the sixth paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4187479 | Ishizuka et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4459698 | Yumoto et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4639681 | Hasegawa | Jan 1987 | A |
4985900 | Rhind et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5293405 | Gersbach et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5384551 | Kennedy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5682112 | Fukushima | Oct 1997 | A |
5703853 | Horigome et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5764695 | Nagaraj et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5844431 | Chen | Dec 1998 | A |
5850422 | Chen | Dec 1998 | A |
5991339 | Bazes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999056 | Fong | Dec 1999 | A |
6038266 | Lee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6192071 | Hirth et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225795 | Stratakos et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6265911 | Nairn | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266379 | Dally | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282690 | McClellan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329874 | Ye et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6429692 | Chan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438187 | Abbey | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6496911 | Dixon et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6570916 | Feldbaumer et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580768 | Jaquette | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6624688 | Jaussi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6658054 | Kuribayashi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6717995 | Zvonar | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731683 | Fiedler et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734920 | Ghosh et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6812872 | Lu | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6992855 | Ehrlich | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030657 | Stojanovic et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7092472 | Stojanovic | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126378 | Stojanovic et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7173993 | Engl et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176721 | Ho et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194025 | Wood et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7233164 | Stojanovic et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7286597 | Buchwald et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310397 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315594 | Schmatz et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7315596 | Payne et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325175 | Momtaz | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7397848 | Stojanovic et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397876 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400675 | Moughabghab et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406135 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418069 | Schmatz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7496161 | Chou et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508872 | Yamazaki | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7555091 | Lewicki et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7596176 | Eleftheriou et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7639736 | Farjad-rad | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7715471 | Werner et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715509 | Stojanovic et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742520 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7797701 | Snow | Sep 2010 | B1 |
8446940 | Farjad-rad | May 2013 | B2 |
20020009167 | Farjad-Rad | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020044618 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040005001 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008059 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040052309 | Li | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040091028 | Aronson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040190661 | Vrazel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203559 | Stojanovic | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040252754 | Wood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047500 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108600 | Arguelles | May 2005 | A1 |
20050180536 | Payne et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050238092 | Ng | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259726 | Farjad-rad | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271137 | Kolze et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271169 | Momtaz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002497 | Zhang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060188043 | Zerbe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224339 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251195 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256892 | Momtaz | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280240 | Kikugawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002942 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064848 | Desai | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070110148 | Momtaz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110199 | Momtaz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070195874 | Aziz et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070253475 | Palmer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037693 | Andrus et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080107165 | Nicolescu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112521 | Schmatz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080247452 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285695 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090076939 | Berg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090237138 | Shanbhag et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100008414 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027606 | Dai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2005-022750 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/572,951, filed May 21, 2004, Farjad-rad, Ramin. |
Abramovitch, Danny “Lyapunov Redesign of Classical Digital Phase-Lock Loops” Communications and Optics Research Lab, Agilent Technologies, 22 pages, Jun. 5, 2003. |
Abramovitch, Danny “Phase-Locked Loops: A Control Centric Tutortial” Communications and Optics Research Lab, Agilent Technologies, 50 pages, May 8, 2002. |
Baker, Alan J, “An Adaptive Cable Equalizer for Serial Digital Video Rates to 400Mb/s.” 1996 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 10, Low-Power & Communication Signal Processing, Paper FA 10.7. 3 Pages. |
Balan, Vishnu et al., “A 4.8-6.4-Gb/s Serial Link for Backplane Applications Using Decision Feedback Equalization”, 2005 IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 1957-1967, Sep. 2005, 11 Pages. |
Brunn, Brian et al., “Edge-Equalization Extends Performance in Multi-Gigabit Serial Links” DesignCon 2005. 13 pages. |
Chen et al., “A 1.25Gb/s, 460mW CMOS Transceiver for Serial Data Communication,” ISSCC97, Session 15, Serial Data Communications, Paper FP 15.3, pp. 242-243, 465, Feb. 7, 1997. 3 pages. |
Choi, Jong-Sang, et al. “A CMOS 3.5Gbps Continuous-time Adaptive Cable Equalizer with Joint Adaptation Method of Low-Frequency Gain and High-Frequency Boosting.” 2003 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Paper. 4 Pages. |
Dally et al., “Transmitter Equalization for 4-Gbps Signaling,” IEEE Micro, vol. 17, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1997, pp. 48-56. 9 pages. |
Farjad-Rad et al., “0.622-8 Gbps 150mW Serial IO Macrocell with Fully Flexible Preemphasis and Equalization,” Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 2003. 4 pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin re U.S. Appl. No. 12/615,824, filed Nov. 10, 2009, Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2010. 13 pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,983, filed Aug. 19, 2009, Response dated Mar. 8, 2011. 13 Pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,983, filed Aug. 19, 2009, re Response dated Sep. 7, 2010 to the Office Action dated May 5, 2010. 14 pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,983, filed Aug. 19, 2009 re Final Office Action dated Jan. 12, 2011. 7 Pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,983, filed Aug. 19, 2009, Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2012. 11 pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/615,824, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2011. 5 Pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/615,824, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Response submitted Feb. 22, 2011 to the Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2011. 8 Pages. |
Farjad-Rad, Ramin, U.S. Appl. No. 12/615,824, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Response dated Nov. 26, 2010 to the Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2010. 12 Pages. |
Granberg, Tom, “Handbook of Digital Techniques for High-Speed Design.” Prentice Hall Modem Semiconductor Design Series. Copyright 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. 12 pages. |
Harwood et al., “24.1: A 12.5Gb/s SerDes in 65nm CMOS Using a Baud-Rate ADC with Digital Receiver Equalization and Clock Recovery,” Feb. 14, 2007, 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, pp. 436-437, 613, 24.1.1-24.1.7. 10 pages. |
Harwood et al., “A 12.5Gb/s SerDes in 65nm CMOS Using a Baud Rate ADC with Digital RX Equalization and Clock Recovery,” Slideshow Presentation, 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 18 pages. |
Kudoh, Yoshiharu. “A 0.13-um CMOS 5-Gb/s 10-m 28 AWG Cable Transceiver with No-Feedback-Loop Continuous-Time Post-Equalizer.” IEEE Joumal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38., No. 5, May 2003. 6 Pages. |
Madduri, Vansanta, “High Speed Backplanes in Communications Systems.” Mar. 2004. 7 pages. |
Meghelli et al., “4.1: A 10Gb/s 5-Tap-DFE/4-Tap-FFE Transceiver in 90nm CMOS,” Feb. 6, 2006, 2006 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 10 pages. |
Napier, Tom, “Flash ADC takes the uncertainty out of high-speed data recovery,” EDN Design Feature, Sep. 1, 1998, pp. 111-118. 5 pages. |
Palmer, Robert E., U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,377, filed Dec. 17, 2009 re Information Disclosure Statement mailed Feb. 11, 2010. 2 Pages. |
Palmer, Robert re U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,377, filed Dec. 17, 2009 re Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2011. 8 Pages. |
Palmer, Robert re U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,377, filed Dec. 17, 2009 re Response dated Apr. 17, 2012 to Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2011. 11 Pages. |
Palmer, Robert re U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,377, filed Dec. 17, 2009, Amendment filed May 11, 2012 After Allowance in Response to the Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated May 1, 2012. 9 Pages. |
Palmer, Robert re U.S. Appl. No. 12/640,377, filed Dec. 17, 2009, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated May 1, 2012. 7 Pages. |
Shakiba, Mohammad Hossein, “A 2.5Gb/s Adaptive Cable Equalizer.” 1999 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 23, Paper WP 23.3. 2 Pages. |
Stojanovic et al., “Adaptive Equalization and Data Recovery in a Dual-Mode (PAM2/4) Serial Link Transceiver,” Rambus, Inc. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Jan. 2004. 4 pages. |
Stojanovic, Vladimir et al. “Transmit Pre-Emphasis for High-Speed Time-Division-Multiplexed Serial Link Transceiver.” Submitted to IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Jun. 2004. 17 pages. |
Widmer et al., “Single-Chip 4×500-MBd CMOS Transceiver,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, No. 12, Dec. 1996, pp. 2004-2014. 11 pages. |
Zerbe, et al., “Equalization and Clock Recovery for a 2.5-10 Gb/s 2-PAM/4-PAM Backplane Transceiver Cell”, Presented at ISSCC 2003, Session 4, Clock Recovery and Backplane Transceivers, Paper 4.6. 10 pages. |
Zhang, Johnny et al. “White Paper on Transmit Pre-Emphasis and Receive Equalization.” Oct. 31, 2002. 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210091985 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16734148 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17065043 | US | |
Parent | 16257240 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16734148 | US | |
Parent | 15889273 | Feb 2018 | US |
Child | 16257240 | US | |
Parent | 15389499 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15889273 | US | |
Parent | 14702966 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15389499 | US | |
Parent | 14159597 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14702966 | US | |
Parent | 13483845 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14159597 | US | |
Parent | 12640377 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13483845 | US | |
Parent | 11414289 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12640377 | US |