Adaptive filter in a sensor array system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8767973
  • Patent Number
    8,767,973
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 8, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 1, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is a steerable sensor array that receives input from a target and applies an averaging filter. An adaptive filter is then used if the SNR of the output of the averaging filter reaches a threshold.
Description
BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of applications using voice communications. For instance, the Internet has allowed individuals to make telephone calls through a computer, or to talk to other people participating in an online multiplayer game.


Traditionally, an individual who wishes to such voice application usually use headsets with close talking boom microphones. However, prolonged use of such a microphone can be very inconvenient to an individual. An individual wearing a supposed comfortable microphone can find the prolonged use of such a microphone uncomfortable. Alternatively, microphones can be built into a computer or monitor, or may be an external device which is attached to a computer or monitor. Due to the distance between such microphones and the user, such microphones must be able to receive input from a greater area. As a consequence, such microphones are also subject to picking up increased background noise.


Accordingly, there is a need for a high fidelity far field noise canceling microphone that possesses good background noise cancellation and that can be used in any type of noisy environment, especially in environments where a lot of music and speech is present as background noise (as in a game arena or internet café), and a microphone that does not need the user to have to deal with positioning the microphone from time to time. Therefore, an object of the present invention provide for an integrated array of microphones utilizing an adaptive beam forming algorithm. Such an invention does not require an individual to wear a microphone headset and allows a large degree of freedom. Further, such a microphone array allows a user to electronically steer the microphone's beam, or the area in which it accepts voice input, as opposed to having to physically steer the microphone array.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a sensor array having adaptive filtering capabilities and methods of using the same to reduce background and related noise. The sensor array receives digital input from a number of channels. First an averaging filter is applied to the input of each channel. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the output of the averaging filter is calculated. Depending on the SNR, a second filter, namely an adaptive filter would then be applied to the output of the averaging filter. The coefficients of this adaptive filter are updated on the basis of several calculated parameters such as a calculation of the beam of the sensor, a beam reference, a reference average, and noise estimation. These calculations are done on a continuous basis and the adaptive filter coefficients are also continuously updated.


The averaging filter and adaptive filter may be implemented on a digital signal processor or DSP. In other embodiments, general microprocessors, such as those found in computers maybe used to perform the digital processing to implement filtering.


The sensor array itself can be made of microphones. If analog microphones are used the input must be digitized before the digital filtering begins. Alternatively, Digital microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) microphones can be used, wherein the microphone itself digitizes the input. As used herein, the terms microphone array and sensor array are used interchangeably. Any embodiments described as referring to a microphone array are equally applicable to a sensor array, and vice versa.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a drawing of a sensor array according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a schematic depicting the beam forming algorithm according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a drawing depicting a polar beam plot of a 2 member microphone array according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a drawing depicting the corresponding beam to the polar plot of FIG. 3 according to one embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 5 depicts a comparison between the filtering of Microsoft array filter with an array filter disclosed according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a depiction of an example of a visual interface that can be used in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 7 is a depiction of an example of a visual interface that can be used in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to an embodiment of the current invention, a sensor array receives signals from a source. The digitized output of the sensors is then transformed using a discrete Fourier transform (DFT).


The sensors of the sensor array preferably will consist of, but are not limited to, microphones. In one embodiment the microphones will be aligned on a particular axis. In the simplest embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, the array will comprise two microphones, 60 and 70 on a straight line axis. Normally, the array will consist of an even amount of sensors, with the sensors, according to one embodiment, a fixed distance apart from each adjacent sensor. The sensor array can be designed with a mount 80 to sit or attach to or on a computer monitor or similar.


Advantageously, a video camera 75 or some other type of device or sensor may fit or be located in-between the two most center microphones of the sensor array such that there is an equal amount of microphones on each side of the video camera or other device. According to an embodiment of the invention, the microphones generally will be positioned horizontally, and symmetrically with respect to a vertical axis. In such an arrangement there are two sets of microphones, one on each side of the vertical axis corresponding to two separate channels, a left and right channel, for example.


In certain embodiments, the microphones will be digital microphones such as uni or omni-directional electret microphones, or micro machined micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) microphones. The advantage of using the MEMS microphones is that they have silicon circuitry that internally converts an analog audio signal into a digital signal without the need of an A/D converter, as other microphones would require in other embodiments of this invention. In any event, after the received audio signals are digitized, according to an embodiment of the present invention, the signals travel through adjustable delay lines that act as input into a microprocessor or a DSP. The delay lines are adjustable, such that a user can control the beam of the array. In one embodiment, the delay lines are fed into the microprocessor of a computer. In such an embodiment, as well as others described herein, there may be a graphical user interface (GUI) that provides feedback to a user. For example, the interface can tell the user the width of the beam produced from the array, the direction of the beam, and how much sound it is picking up from a source. Based on input from a user of the electronic device containing the microphone array, the user can vary the delay lines that carry the output of the digitizer or digital microphone to the microprocessor or DSP. As is well known in the areas of sensor array or antenna array technology, by changing the delay lines from the sensors, the direction of the beam can be changed. This allows a user then to steer the beam. For example, the microphone array might by default produce a beam direction that is directly straightforward from the microphone array. But if the target signal is not directly ahead of the sensor array, but instead at an angle with respect to the sensor array, it would extremely helpful for the user to steer the beam in the direction of the target source. Allowing a person to steer the beam through electronic beams is more efficient than requiring the manual movement of the device containing the sensor array. The steering ability allows the sensor array, including a microphone array, itself to be small and compact without requiring parts to physically move the sensors. In the case of an embodiment for use with a computer system or other similar electronic device, the software receiving the input would process the input through the GUI and properly translate the commands of user to accordingly adjust the delay lines to the user's wishes. The beam may be steered before any input or anytime after the sensor array or microphones receive input from a source.


The present invention, according to one embodiment as presented in FIG. 2, produces substantial cancellation or reduction of background noise. After the steerable microphone array produces a two-channel input signal that is digitized 20 and on which beam steering is applied 22, the output is transformed using a DFT 24. It is well known in the art that there are many algorithms that can perform a DFT. In particular, a fast Fourier transform (FFT) maybe used to efficiently transform the data so that it is more amenable for digital processing. As mentioned previously, the DFT processing can take place in a general microprocessor, or a DSP. After transformation, the data can be filtered according to the embodiment of FIG. 2.


This invention applies an adaptive filter in order to greatly filter out background noise. The key is the way in which the adaptive filter is composed and in particular how the coefficients that make up the filter are produced. The adaptive filter is a mathematical transfer function. In one embodiment presented, the filter coefficient is dependent on the past and present digital input.


An embodiment as shown in FIG. 2 discloses an averaging filter that is first applied to the digitally transformed input in order to smooth the digital input and remove high frequency artifacts 26. This is done for each channel. In addition, the noise from each channel is also determined 28. Once the noise is determined, different variables can be calculated to update the adaptive filter coefficients. The channels are averaged and compared against a calibration threshold 32. Such a threshold is usually set by the manufacturer. If the result falls below a threshold, the values are adjusted by a weighting average function such as to reduce distortion by a phase mismatch between the channels.


Another parameter calculated, according the embodiment in FIG. 2, is the signal to noise ratio (SNR). The SNR is calculated from the averaging filter output and the noise calculated 34 from each channel. The result of the SNR calculation if it reaches a certain threshold will trigger modifying the digital input using the filter coefficients of the previous calculated beam. The threshold, which is typically set by the manufacturer, is a value in which the output may be sufficiently reliable for use in certain applications. In different situations or applications, a higher SNR may be desired, and the threshold may be adjusted by an individual.


The beam for each input is continuously calculated. A beam is calculated as the average of signals, for instance, of two signals from a left and right channel, the average including the difference of angle between the target source and each channel. Along with the beam, a beam reference, reference average, and beam average are also calculated 36. The beam reference is a weighted average of a previous calculated beam and the adaptive filter coefficients. A reference average is the weighted sum of the previous calculated beam references. Furthermore, there is also a calculation for beam average, which is the running average of previous calculated beams. All these factors are used to update the adaptive filter.


Using the calculated beam and beam average, an error calculation is performed by subtracting the current beam from the beam average 42. This error is then used in conjunction with an updated reference average 44 and updated beam average 40 in a noise estimation calculation 46. The noise calculation helps predict the noise from the system including the filter. The noise prediction calculation is used in updating the coefficients of the adaptive filter 48 such as to minimize or eliminate potential noise.


After updating the filter and applying the digital input to it, the output of the filter is then processed by an inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT). After the IDFT, the output then may be used in digital form as input into an audio application, such as audio recording, voice over internet protocol (VOIP), speech recognition, or the output can be sent as input to another, separate computing system for additional processing.


According to another embodiment, the digital output from the adaptive filter may be reconverted by a D/A converter into an analog signal and sent to an output device. In the case of an audio signal, the output from the filter can be sent as input to another computer or electronic device for processing. Or it may be sent to an acoustic device such as a speaker system, or headphones for example.


The algorithm, as disclosed herein, is advantageously able to effectively filtering of noise, including non-stationary noise or sudden noise such as a door slamming. Furthermore, the algorithm allows superior filtering at lower frequencies while also allowing the spacing between elements in the array, i.e., between microphones, to be small, including as little as 2 inches or 50 mm in a two element microphone embodiment. Previously, microphones arrays would require substantially greater spacing, such as a foot or more between elements to be able to have the same amount filtering at the lower frequencies.


Another advantage of the algorithm as presented is that it, for the most part, requires no customization for a wide range of different spacings between the elements in the array. The algorithm is robust and flexible enough to automatically adjust and handle the element spacing a microphone array system might be required to have in order to work in conjunction with common electronic or computer devices.



FIG. 3 shows a polar beam plot of a 2 member microphone array according to an embodiment of the invention wherein the delays lines of the left and right channels are equal. FIG. 4 shows the corresponding beam as shown in the polar plot of FIG. 3 in an embodiment where the microphone array is used in conjunction with a computer system. The microphone array is placed a top a monitor in FIG. 4. In such an embodiment, the speakers are placed outside of the main beam. Because of the superior performance of the microphone array system, the array attenuates signals originating from sources outside of the main beam, such as the speakers as shown in FIG. 4, such that microphone array effectively acts as an echo canceller with there being no feedback distortion.


The beam typically will be focused narrowly on the target source, which is typically the human voice, as depicted in FIG. 4. When the target source moves outside the beam width, the input of the microphone array shows a dramatic decrease in signal strength as shown in FIG. 5. The 12,000 mark on the axis represents a target source or input source directly in front of the microphone array. The 10,000 mark and 14,000 mark correspond to the outer parts of the beam as shown in FIGS. 3 and 3. FIG. 5 shows, for example, a comparison between the filtering of a Microsoft array filter with an array fitter according to an embodiment of the present invention. As soon as the target source falls outside of the beam width, or at the 10,000 or 14,000 marks, there is a very noticeable and dramatic roll off in signal strength in the microphone array using an embodiment of the present invention. By contrast, there is no such roll off found in the Microsoft array filter.


As one of skill in the art would recognize, in the invention as disclosed, the sensor array could be placed on or integrated within different types of devices such as any devices that require or may use an audio input, such a computer system, laptop, cellphone, global positioning system, audio recorder, etc. For instance, in a computer system embodiment, the microphone array may be integrated, wherein the signals from the microphones are carried through delay lines directly into the computer's microprocessor. The calculations performed for the algorithm described according to an embodiment of the present invention may take place in a microprocessor, such as an Intel Pentium Processor, typically used for personal computers. Alternatively, the processing may be done by a digital signal processor (DSP). The microprocessor or DSP may be used to handle the user input to control the adjustable lines and the beam steering.


Alternatively, in a computer system embodiment, the microphone array and the delay lines can be connected, for example, to a USB input instead of being integrated with a computer system. In such an embodiment, the signals may then be routed to the microprocessor, or it may be routed to a separate DSP chip that is also connected to the same or different computer system for digital processing. The microprocessor of the computer in such an embodiment could still run the GUI that allows the user to control the delays and thus control the steering of the beam, but the DSP will perform the appropriate filtering of the signal according to an embodiment of an algorithm presented herein.


In some embodiments, the spacing of the microphones in the sensor array maybe adjustable. By adjusting the spacing, the directivity and beam width of the sensor can be modified. In some embodiments, if a video sensor or camera is placed in the center of the microphone array it may be preferable to have the beam width the same as the optical viewing angle of the video camera or sensor.


Additional drawings shown in FIGS. 6 and- 7 depict alternate visual user interfaces that be used with the invention as disclosed. FIG. 7 is a portion of the visual interface as shown in FIG. 5.


Having thus described in detail preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is to be understood that the invention defined by the foregoing paragraphs is not to be limited to particular details and/or embodiments set forth in the above description, as many apparent variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A sensor array device, comprising: a sensor array having at least two sensors, the sensor array having one or more channels;a processing means connected to the sensor array receiving electrical signals representing output of the sensor array, said processing means comprising: means for applying an adaptive filter to the electrical signals;means for applying an averaging filter to the electrical signals;means for calculating current filter coefficients of a beam representing the electrical signals, a beam reference, a reference average, and a noise estimation based on the output of the averaging filter to update the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter; andmeans for optionally applying the adaptive filter to the output of the averaging filter wherein coefficients of the adaptive filter applied to the output of the averaging filter are updated based on one or more of the calculated current filter coefficients of the beam representing the electrical signals, the calculated beam reference, the calculated reference average and the calculated noise estimation.
  • 2. The sensor array device of claim 1, further comprising means for calculating the signal-to-noise ratio of the output of the averaging filter.
  • 3. The sensor array device of claim 2, wherein the adaptive filter is applied if the signal-to-noise ratio of the output of the averaging filter reaches a set threshold.
  • 4. The sensor array device of claim 1, further comprising means for allowing a user to steer a beam direction of the sensor array by adjusting delay lines in the sensor array device.
  • 5. The sensor array device of claim 1, wherein the sensors in the sensor array are digital microphones.
  • 6. The sensor array device of claim 5, wherein said microphones are a uni or omni-directional electret microphone, or a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) microphone.
  • 7. The sensor array device of claim 1, wherein a computer receives the electrical signals from the sensor array and one or more microprocessors of the computer performs the calculations to apply the averaging filter and the adaptive filter.
  • 8. The sensor array device of claim 1, wherein a DSP performs the calculations to apply the averaging filter and the adaptive filter.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/332,959, filed Dec. 11, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,150,054, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application Number 61/012,884 filed Dec. 11, 2007. The present application also makes reference to Provisional Application Number 61/048,142 filed Apr. 25, 2008. All of these applications are incorporated herein by reference. Each document cited in this text (“application cited documents”) and each document cited or referenced in each of the application cited documents, and any manufacturer's specifications or instructions for any products mentioned in this text and in any document incorporated into this text, are hereby incorporated herein by reference; and, technology in each of the documents incorporated herein by reference can be used in the practice of this invention.

US Referenced Citations (59)
Number Name Date Kind
4025724 Davidson et al. May 1977 A
4088849 Usami et al. May 1978 A
4956867 Zurek et al. Sep 1990 A
5463694 Bradley et al. Oct 1995 A
5610991 Janse Mar 1997 A
5815582 Claybaugh et al. Sep 1998 A
5825897 Andrea et al. Oct 1998 A
6118878 Jones Sep 2000 A
6430295 Handel et al. Aug 2002 B1
6430296 Olsen Aug 2002 B1
6449586 Hoshuyama Sep 2002 B1
6728380 Zhu et al. Apr 2004 B1
6959092 Berkhoff et al. Oct 2005 B1
7054452 Ukita May 2006 B2
7065219 Abe et al. Jun 2006 B1
7092529 Yu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7142677 Gonopolskiy et al. Nov 2006 B2
7155019 Hou Dec 2006 B2
7346175 Hui et al. Mar 2008 B2
7415117 Tashev et al. Aug 2008 B2
7471798 Warren Dec 2008 B2
7475014 Smaragdis et al. Jan 2009 B2
7478041 Ichikawa et al. Jan 2009 B2
7630502 Beaucoup et al. Dec 2009 B2
7711127 Suzuki et al. May 2010 B2
7720679 Ichikawa et al. May 2010 B2
7769186 Stokes et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803050 Mao et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809145 Mao Oct 2010 B2
7817805 Griffin Oct 2010 B1
8150054 Andrea et al. Apr 2012 B2
8160261 Schulein et al. Apr 2012 B2
20040001598 Balan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040161121 Chol et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165735 Opitz Aug 2004 A1
20050207585 Christoph Sep 2005 A1
20050281415 Lambert et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060222184 Buck et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060233389 Mao et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239471 Mao et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060270468 Hui et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070023851 Hartzell et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070223731 Togami et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070287380 Hui et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080152161 Kim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159559 Akagi et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175408 Mukund et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187152 Kim et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080232607 Tashev et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080317259 Zhang et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090103749 Goodwin Apr 2009 A1
20090129608 Puder May 2009 A1
20090129609 Oh et al. May 2009 A1
20090190774 Wang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090208028 Andrea et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090268931 Andrea et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100008518 Mao Jan 2010 A1
20110129097 Andrea Jun 2011 A1
20120057719 Andrea et al. Mar 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
WO 2006028587 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2008146082 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2008157421 Dec 2008 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120057719 A1 Mar 2012 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61012884 Dec 2007 US
61048142 Apr 2008 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12332959 Dec 2008 US
Child 13291565 US