The present disclosure relates to a mechanical returnless fuel system, and more specifically, to an adaptive fuel delivery module in a conventional, mechanical returnless fuel system in which back pressure is used to estimate engine fuel demand and adjust fuel pump speed.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art. Conventional vehicular fuel systems, such as those installed in automobiles, may employ a “return fuel system” whereby a fuel supply tube is utilized to supply fuel to an engine and a fuel return line is utilized to return, hence “return fuel system,” unused fuel to a fuel tank. Such return fuel systems require the use of both, a supply line to and a return fuel line from the engine. More modern vehicles typically employ a “returnless fuel system” that may either be mechanically or electronically controlled.
Regarding such returnless fuel systems, such as a mechanical returnless fuel system (“MRFS”), only a fuel supply line from a fuel tank to an engine is utilized; therefore, no return fuel line from the engine to the fuel tank is necessary. As a result, a MRFS only delivers the volume of fuel required by an engine, regardless of the varying degree of the volume of fuel required; however, the fuel pump operates at 100% capacity irrespective of engine demand, with excess fuel being discharged through a fuel pump module via the pressure regulator. Because the fuel pump operates at 100% regardless of engine demand, more electrical energy is consumed than would be if the pump speed could be varied in accordance with such engine demand. Additionally, with the fuel pump operating at 100% of its speed capacity at all times, pump wear may be greater than if the pump operates at a fraction of its 100% speed capacity. Finally, noise, vibration and harshness are higher, especially at engine idle, than they otherwise would be if the fuel pump speed could be controlled. In a MRFS no interaction with an electronic control module or vehicle body control module occurs.
Electronic returnless fuel systems (“ERFS”) typically employ a pressure sensor in the engine fuel rail that communicates with a vehicle electronic control unit (“ECU”). The ECU may then communicate with a fuel pump controller which may use pulse width modulation (“PWM”), as an example, to control the voltage level across the fuel pump. By controlling the voltage level across the fuel pump, the pumping speed of the fuel pump, and accordingly its output volume, may be controlled. While such current MRFS and ERFS have generally proven to be satisfactory for their applications, each is associated with its share of limitations.
One limitation of current MRFS is that their fuel pumps operate at only one speed, that is, 100% of capacity, regardless of engine speed or engine fuel requirements. Operating in this manner may contribute to premature failure and necessary replacement of fuel pumps. Furthermore, noise, vibration and harshness, due to a fuel pump operating at 100% capacity at all times, is greater than a fuel pump that varies its speed. Additionally, at 100% capacity, the fuel pump draws a higher current and therefore diminishes fuel economy by placing a higher draw on the battery, and thus the alternator and consequently, on fuel consumption of the engine.
A limitation of current ERFS is that controlling the fuel pump is accomplished by using the vehicle ECU, and further communication with a fuel pump control unit. Such communication with a vehicle ECU requires extensive software programming and cross-coordination of engineering groups between fuel system suppliers and the supplier of the vehicle ECU. Furthermore, components such as exposed pressure sensors projecting from the fuel line at the engine are required and limit access to the engine by technicians or create an obstacle for adjacent parts.
What is needed then is a device that does not suffer from the above limitations. This, in turn, will provide a device that works similar to an MRFS, permits speed control of the fuel pump in accordance with engine fuel requirements, requires no cross-coordination with vehicle body ECU suppliers, does not require communication with a vehicle ECU, reduces consumption of electrical energy, and reduces noise, vibration and harshness.
An adaptive fuel delivery module for a mechanical returnless fuel system utilizes a pressure sensor, which is part of the fuel pump module, within a casing that traditionally houses a pressure regulator, a jet pump supply orifice and a pressure relief valve. The pressure sensor communicates with a fuel pump voltage control module that communicates with the fuel pump to vary the speed of the fuel pump to maintain an average back pressure at the pressure sensor within the casing. Varying the speed of the fuel pump first involves inputting a sensed pressure to a continuously running trigger circuit logic routine that compares an absolute value of the difference between the sensed pressure and a mean pressure to a predetermined back pressure. If the absolute value is greater than the predetermined back pressure, a control circuit logic routine is enabled.
The control circuit compares the sensed pressure value to a high pressure threshold and a low pressure threshold and adjusts the speed of the fuel pump when the sensed pressure is beyond such thresholds. By adjusting the speed of the fuel pump, the back pressure of the fuel pump as sensed by the pressure sensor is maintained as close as possible to the average pressure. The trigger circuit routine is continuously operated while the control circuit is operated when invoked by the trigger circuit.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
With reference to
Continuing with
With continued reference to
With continued reference to
Continuing, when the back pressure within the casing 94 is greater than a predetermined pressure, the relief valve 74 discharges fuel and pressure in accordance with arrow 76, into the fuel tank 16, and more specifically, into the reservoir 28 to prevent the fuel pressure from exceeding a certain pre-determined pressure. The discharged fuel may once again be drawn into the fuel pump 20 at the sock filter 64 depicted at the bottom of the fuel pump 20. Additionally, the orifice 70 also discharges fuel not destined for combustion, as depicted with flow arrow 86. The flow in accordance with arrow 86 may travel through a jet pump tube 88 and be directed into the bottom of the reservoir 28 at the jet pump 90. Fuel that is not discharged into the reservoir 28 flows in accordance with flow arrow 93, which is high pressure fuel en route to the engine 12 in fuel line 14.
With continued reference to
A more detailed explanation of the present invention will now be provided with reference to
Upon the back pressure “P” being read into the trigger circuit 100 at input block 102, it passes to decision block 104 where it is compared to the mean pressure “Pmean.” Pmean is the desired level of the back pressure to be read at the pressure sensor 92 and may be computed as (Pmax+Pmin)/2 as depicted in
In the above explanation, 5 kPa represents the amount of tolerance that the back pressure is permitted to stray from Pmean, either higher or lower, before correction back to Pmean is invoked. When the sensed pressure is greater than 5 kPa, the engine 12 is regarded as being in the process of either increasing or decreasing in speed to the extent that alteration of the fuel pump speed may be necessary. The control circuit 108 will confirm such perceived need.
Once control proceeds to the control circuit 108, the control logic of the trigger circuit 100 has determined that because the detected pressure is at least 5 kPa from the mean pressure (Pmean), the engine 12 may be demanding more or less fuel as detected by the pressure sensor 92. Generally, when the engine 12 demands an increasing or sustained increased quantity of fuel, such as during engine acceleration or maintained high vehicle speeds, the pressure sensor 92 will detect a decreasing or sustained decreased fuel back pressure, respectively. Likewise, when the engine 12 demands a decreasing or sustained decreased quantity of fuel, such as during engine deceleration or sustained slow speeds, the pressure sensor 92 will detect an increasing fuel back pressure or sustained increased fuel back pressure.
Upon entering the logic of the control circuit 108, the back pressure measured by the pressure sensor 92 is compared to a high pressure threshold (“PHith”) in decision block 110. PHith is a threshold limit that is selected to be a particular percentage less than the maximum operating pressure of the fuel system, or alternatively it may be limited to be the allowable back pressure on the pressure regulator 62 for durability purposes. For example, PHith could be set to be 5% or 10% below the maximum operating fuel pressure. Continuing with the control circuit 108, if the answer to the inquiry at the decision block 110 is “Yes”, then the logic flows to decision block 112, where the mode of the fuel pump 20 is queried. The decision block 112 asks if the mode of the fuel pump 20 is set to “high,” which is the maximum fuel pumping mode of the fuel pump 20, or at least the fuel pumping mode capable of supplying the highest demand, or more than the highest demand, of the engine 12. If the result of this inquiry is “Yes,” then the logic flows to block 114 where the voltage across the fuel pump is toggled or changed when a toggle mode is invoked. That is, the voltage across the fuel pump 20 is lowered to slow the speed of the fuel pump 20, which will in turn lower the fuel pressure to or closer to Pmean. Again, Pmean is an average back pressure calculated such that Pmean=(Pmax+Pmin)/2, which is in accordance with the depicted back pressures of
Returning to decision block 110, if the result of the inquiry is “No,” then the logic flows to decision block 116. At decision block 116, an inquiry is made as to whether the detected or measured fuel back pressure “P” measured at the pressure sensor 92 is less than PLowth. PLowth is a threshold limit that is selected to be a particular percentage higher than the minimum operating pressure of the fuel system. For example, PLowth could be set to be 5% or 10% greater than the minimum operating fuel pressure. The threshold limits, PLowth and PHith, may be set such that the average operating pressure, Pmean, is the average of such values, but such is not required.
If the answer to the inquiry at decision block 116 is “Yes”, then the logic flows to decision block 118 where the logic inquires whether the operating mode of the fuel pump 20 is set to its “Low” mode. If the fuel pump is set to its “Low” mode, and the pressure sensor 92 is sensing a fuel pressure below its PLowth value, then this means that the engine 12 is demanding fuel at such a volume that the pressure has dropped or is dropping. To compensate for the drop in pressure and to supply a greater volume of fuel to the engine 12, the logic flow proceeds to block 114 where the voltage across the fuel pump 20 is changed or toggled in such a fashion to increase the speed of the fuel pump 20 such that the fuel pressure and volume increase and the back pressure moves towards and achieves the Pmean back pressure level.
Although pressure-changing logic paths have been addressed above, several paths cause no voltage change across the fuel pump 20, and thus, no change in fuel pump 20 speed, output volume, or back pressure. The first situation is if a “No” response results at decision block 112, the second occurs when a “No” response results at decision block 116, and the third is when a “No” response results at decision block 118. In all three situations, the logic flow proceeds to block 120 such that no change results in the voltage across the fuel pump 20. With no change in the voltage across the fuel pump at block 120, control returns to the trigger circuit 100 where the back pressure “P” is again input into the routine at input block 102. Similarly, even if a change in fuel pump voltage is carried out at block 114, as a result of inquiries made at decision blocks 110-112 and 116-118, control then exits the control circuit 108 and returns to the trigger circuit 100. Changing the voltage across the fuel pump 20, and hence the fuel back pressure within the fuel system, may be accomplished with the use of a solid state device, for example, to ensure quick switching without any significant pressure fluctuations or ripples in the high pressure fuel line 14, 36.
While the flowchart of
Continuing with an explanation of the pressures involved, pHith may be 90% of Pmax, while PLoth may be 110% or 1.1 times Pmin. The relief valve 74 may open if the fuel pressure obtains the Pmax level, while the relief valve 74 may be set to close at pressures below the Pmax level. Although the relief valve 74 is depicted in
There are multiple advantages of the teachings of the present invention. First, the fuel pump 20 will undergo continuous changes in its speed as a result of the control provided by the voltage control module 48. Although various types of a control module 48 are possible, a resistor based switch or a PWM (pulse width modulation) utilizing duty cycle control is possible. Another advantage is that since the fuel pump 20 is not operating at 100% of its pumping capacity when the engine is running, electrical energy is conserved. Since electrical energy is conserved, the engine 12, which provides rotational energy to an alternator (not shown) which supplies electrical energy to the battery 46, the alternator does not consume as much rotational energy from the engine 12, thus conserving gasoline in the combustion process and increasing the fuel mileage of the vehicle. Additionally, because the fuel pump 20 is operating at reduced and varying speeds compared to traditional MRFS versions of the pump that run at 100% of capacity as long at the engine is operating, the life of the fuel pump may be prolonged, and noise, vibration, and harshness may be reduced. Another advantage is that the adaptive MRFS of the present teachings is capable of replacing a traditional MRFS in vehicles currently in use, if repair or replacement of the traditional MRFS becomes necessary. Finally, the AMRFS of the present teachings permits some of the advantages of an ERFS without any interaction with a vehicle's electronic control unit. That is, only the controller of the AMRFS is utilized.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4248194 | Drutchas et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4926829 | Tuckey | May 1990 | A |
5044344 | Tuckey et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5148792 | Tuckey | Sep 1992 | A |
5237975 | Betki et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5265644 | Tuckey | Nov 1993 | A |
5284119 | Smitley | Feb 1994 | A |
5337718 | Tuckey | Aug 1994 | A |
5398655 | Tuckey | Mar 1995 | A |
5411002 | Smitley | May 1995 | A |
5505180 | Otterman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5579738 | Frischmuth et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5701869 | Richardson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5752490 | Rodgers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765535 | Radermacher | Jun 1998 | A |
5819709 | Holmes et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6223731 | Yoshiume et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6279541 | Doane et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305362 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318344 | Lucier et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6357422 | Doane et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6532941 | Begley et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6581574 | Moran et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6715470 | Takahashi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6840222 | Schilling et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6877488 | Washeleski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6925990 | Konopacki | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7188608 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20020020397 | Begley et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030221675 | Washeleski et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080127944 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |