The present invention is directed to a gunner protection system for positioning armor panels on the roof of armored vehicles to create an armored envelope protecting gunners operating roof mounted weaponry or equipment. Specifically, the present invention is directed to an adaptive gunner protection system having armored panels that can be repositioned to change the geometry and size of the armored envelope to accommodate different weapons or equipment or to collapse the armored envelope for efficient transport of the vehicle.
Lightly armored vehicles have recently seen increased use in urban combat situations in which a gunner operating a roof mounted weapon is often exposed to close quarter small arms fire and/or improvised explosive devices (“IEDs”). Accordingly, these vehicles are often retrofitted with gunner protection kits (“GPKs”) that position armored panels or similar structures around the hatch of the vehicle to form an armored envelope shielding the upper body of a gunner operating the roof mounted weapon while standing in the hatch. The armored envelope typically defines an opening through which the weapon can be extended. The opening is typically sized to correspond to the type of weapon mounted and to provide sufficient visibility to allow the gunner to effectively aim and operate the weapon while still protecting the gunner from ballistic threats.
As shown in
In addition, the overall geometry of armored envelopes sized for machine guns and grenade launcher is often too small to fit the often substantially bulkier dimensions of missile or rocket launchers and other large weapon systems. The limited confines of the armored envelope can also present safety hazards for the gunner when operating missile launchers or other systems that produce significant back blast. Machine guns, grenade launchers and mortars produce no back blast. Accordingly, GPKs for those weapon systems typically do not include additional openings for venting back blast as doing so creates additional paths through which ballistic threats can travel. A similar drawback is that targeting systems used for painting targets for airstrikes or artillery fire are also often large and bulky making them incompatible with the often smaller envelope geometry created by GPKs for machine guns. The specific requirements of individual weapons and equipment systems typically requires that the entire GPKs be replaced when a different weapon or targeting system is to be mounted, thereby substantially increasing the logistical challenges of providing adequate protection for the gunner.
A similar challenge with GPKs is that the armored envelope formed by the GPK can substantially increase the overall height of the vehicle. The armored paneling must often extend a substantial distance above the top of the hatch to provide sufficient protection for the gunner. The armored envelope typically comprises paneling positioned around the hatch that is at least the height of the gunner's head. In addition, the armored envelope often comprises an armored roof for protecting the gunner from ballistic threats originating from above the vehicle. The top cover further increases the height of the armored envelope and the overall height of the vehicle. As the GPKs are often fitted to the vehicle before the armored vehicles are transported into the theater by ship or plane, the added height can make efficiently transporting the vehicles to the theater within the limited confines of a ship or plane difficult. Accordingly, GPKs are often separately transported and not fitted to the vehicle until after the vehicle has been transported into the theater. However, the inherent drawback of this approach is that the assembly process must be done in theater where maintenance and other equipment necessary for assembly may be more limited. In addition, the assembly process creates substantial downtime where the vehicle is otherwise ready for use, but is awaiting installation of the GPK.
Accordingly, there is a need for a means of providing an armored envelope for gunners that can be used with multiple weapons or targeting systems, while allowing for efficient transport of the vehicle into the theater.
The present invention is directed to an adapted gunner protection system that comprises a plurality of armored panels that can be arranged around the roof hatch of a vehicle to provide an armored envelope for protecting a gunner operating a roof mounted weapon or equipment system. The panels can be arranged to define at least one opening through which the weapon or equipment system can be operated. Each armored panel is rotatably mounted to the vehicle roof such that each panel can be individually raised to a generally vertical orientation to define a portion of the overall armored envelope or lowered to a position against the vehicle roof to increase the size of the armored envelope or create a second opening in the armored envelope. The individual positioning of the armored panels allows the size and shape of the armored envelope and opening to be customized for the particular weapon or equipment system mounted to the vehicle at that time. The armored envelope can be increased in size or provide additional openings for addressing back blast from certain weapon systems. Similarly, all of the panels can be lowered against the roof of the vehicle to collapse the armor panel without disengaging the panels from the vehicle allowing for efficient transport of the vehicle without the additional difficulty of attaching the armor system in theatre.
In one aspect, at least one of the armored panels can be upright when rotated into the vehicle orientation. In another aspect, at least one of the armored panels can be angled radially inward toward the center of the hatch when raised to the vertical orientation. In this configuration, two adjoining panels that are inwardly angled can be engaged together along a common edge, wherein the inward angle of the armored panels cooperates to maintain the panels in the generally vertical orientation without requiring an additional support structure to prevent the armored panels from collapsing inward from impacts to the exterior of the armored envelope. The inwardly angled armored panels also provide protection from ballistic threats directed from angles above the horizontal. In yet another, aspect, at least one of the panels can be angled outward to provide clearance for certain weapons and equipment system. Similarly, the outward angle of the panels can provide an angled surface for directing the back blast of certain weapon systems, such missiles, rockets or recoilless rifles, upwards away from the vehicle rather than downward toward the vehicle roof or back toward the weapon system or gunner. The panels are rotated radially outward to lower the panels into the generally horizontal position to collapse all or a portion of the armored envelope.
A gunner protection system, according to an embodiment of the present invention, comprises a mounting plate and a plurality of armored panels including at least two fore panels, at least two side panels and at least one rear panel combinable to define an armored envelope. Each fore panel can further comprise a hinged bracket for rotatably mounting the fore panel to the mounting plate. In one aspect, each fore panel can comprise a fold out portion that can be rotated between a first position in which the fold out portion is positioned against the fore panel and a second position in which the fold out portion extends outward from the fore panel to increase the size of the armored envelope. Each side panel can comprise a hinged bracket for rotatable mounting the side panel to the mounting plate and an engagement assembly for securing the side panel to one of the fore panels along common edge when the fore panel and side panel are positioned in a generally vertical orientation. The back panel can similarly comprise a hinged bracket for rotatably mounting the back panel to the mounting plate. The back panel can also comprise an engagement assembly for affixing the back panel to the adjoining side panels. In one aspect, the back panel can also comprise a fold out portion rotatable between a first position in which the fold out portion is positioned against the rear panel and a second position in which the fold out portion is extends from the rear panel such that the back panel and fold out portion defines a continuous planar surface.
In one aspect, the fore panels, side panels and back panel can be arranged to define a u-shaped armored envelope. In this configuration, the fore panels generally define the ends of the U such that the fore panels cooperate to define an opening in the armored panel through which the weapon or equipment system can be operated. Similarly, the side-panels define the arms of the U, while the back panel defines junction of the arms of the U. The individual panels can be raised and lowered according to the particular geometry of the armored envelope required for the specific weapon or equipment system mounted to the vehicle.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the fore panels, the side panels or back panel can each comprise a transparent armored window. The armored windows allow for increased visibility through the armored panels without requiring an additional slot or opening for providing a sight line through the armored envelope. In one aspect, the armored windows can be positioned in the armored panels to correspond to the sight lines of the gunner when operating the weapon or equipment system.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the gunner protection system can comprise a gun shield mountable to the weapon system. The gun shield further comprises an armored panel defining a slot for receiving the barrel or a portion of the action of a weapon system. The gun shield further comprises a weapon mount for attaching the panel to the weapon system. The gun shield is positioned on the weapon system such that the edges of the armored panel overlap with the edges of the opening defined by the fore panels to eliminate a direct path through the armored envelope between the gun shield and the fore panels. In one aspect, the overlap between the gun shield and fore panels can be sized such that the weapon system can be rotated and aimed during operation of the weapon system without creating gaps between the gun shield and fore panels.
A method of protecting a gunner operating a roof mounted weapon or equipment system, according to an embodiment of the present invention, comprises providing a plurality of armored panels each rotatable between a horizontal orientation and a generally vertical orientation. The method can further comprise arranging the plurality of armored panels around a hatch in a u-shaped configuration. The method also comprises rotating at least one of the armored panels into the generally vertical orientation to create an armored envelope providing ballistic protection for the gunner. The method can further comprise rotating at least one armored panel into the generally horizontal orientation to change the shape and size of the armored envelope.
The above summary of the various representative embodiments of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the invention. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art can appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the invention. The figures in the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
The invention can be completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a is a side view of the prior art vehicle.
b is a perspective view of an embodiment of a prior art vehicle.
c is a perspective view of another embodiment of a prior art vehicle.
c depict prior art incorporation of fixed turret systems.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives.
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
As depicted in
In one embodiment of the present invention, the fore panel 48 further comprises an armored window 84. Similarly, the side panel 60 can also comprise armored window 86. The armored windows 84, 86 can be aligned with the sight lines of the gunner when operating the weapon or equipment system.
As depicted in
The embodiments above are intended to be illustrative and not limiting. Additional embodiments are encompassed within the scope of the claims. Although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/534,605 entitled “Adaptive Gunner Protection Kit”, filed Sep. 23, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6302010 | Holler | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7478580 | Parimi et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
D610038 | Kiel et al. | Feb 2010 | S |
D619044 | Kiel et al. | Jul 2010 | S |
D622182 | Parimi et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7832325 | Hamann | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7895932 | Ohnstad | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7942092 | Kiel et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7946210 | Schneider et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8006606 | Petrosillo | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8146476 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8196503 | Ran et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8342073 | Chu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8402877 | Petrosillo et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8434395 | Petrosillo et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
20050188831 | Squires et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050188832 | Tsatsis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070000377 | Ohnstad | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090120274 | Schneider et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100005644 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100126337 | Carter | May 2010 | A1 |
20110126697 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154981 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167996 | White et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110197747 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120036989 | Kachtan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130009420 | Ackermann | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130220109 | Berkovich et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
12302 | Aug 1916 | GB |
128317 | Jun 1919 | GB |
2461750 | Jan 2010 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT Application PCT/US2012/056922, dated Jul. 1, 2013, 4 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from related PCT Application PCT/US2012/056922, dated Apr. 3, 2014, 6 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report from EP Application EP12858865.4, dated Apr. 9, 2015, 4 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140083284 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61538605 | Sep 2011 | US |