This patent application is related to and incorporates by reference herein in their entirety, the following patent applications that are co-owned and concurrently filed herewith:
In a local area network, a PHY device 12 in a computer 10 (
A signal received from cable 32 by any of transceivers 22A-22D is typically weak, and any degradation affects the bit error rate (BER). Degradation of the signal during transmission across cable 32 occurs for a number of known reasons, such as echo due to reflections in cable 32, near end cross talk (NEXT) and far end cross talk (FEXT) due to the adjacency of conductors in cable 32, attenuation caused by length of cable 32, etc. Such reasons for degradation are internal to a communication channel that is formed between transceivers 12A-12D, 22A-22D by cable 32. Such internally-originated noise depends strictly on the physical characteristics of cable 32 and its connections to transceivers 22A-22D. Several prior art techniques have been developed, to suppress or cancel such internally-originated noise.
The signal transmitted through cable 32 (
Some prior art methods may remove EMI from a signal that is received by any of transceivers 22A-22D by applying spectral analysis directly to the received signal. For further information on spectral analysis of a signal, see the following books: (1) Introduction to Spectral Analysis, by P. Stoica and R. Moses. Prentice Hall, N.J., 1997 and (2) Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Practice, by S. M. Kay, Prentice Hall, N.J. 1988. Also see the article entitled “Electromagnetic Coupling of Twisted Pair Cables” by Reinhard Stolle, published in IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 20, NO. 5, JUNE 2002, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This article provides a theoretical background and supplies simple approximation formulae for prediction of EMI.
To generate a reliable estimate of EMI, several prior art methods of the type described in the preceding paragraph above, require collection of a large amount of data because the interference signal is embedded in the received signal. Depending on the method, the time required to collect such data can become so large as to result in a link drop between the transmitter and the receiver. Hence, the current inventor believes there is a need for detection and estimation of narrow band interference (EMI/RFI), as discussed below.
In several aspects of the invention, a signal (“input signal”) that includes EMI is spectrally enhanced by an adaptive circuit that supplies as one or more output signal(s), one or more portion(s) of the EMI filtered (or in some embodiments bandpass filtered) at one or more frequencies that can be changed adaptively. The output signal(s) is/are then used in one or more tone predictor(s) to generate, based on prior values of the EMI portion(s), one or more predicted tone signals. The predicted tone signal(s) are then subtracted by an arithmetic unit, from a received signal containing the EMI. The result generated by the arithmetic unit is thereafter used in the normal manner, e.g. decoded and supplied to a media access controller (MAC). Therefore, the adaptive circuit, the one or more tone predictor(s), and the arithmetic unit together form a feed-forward noise-predictive narrowband interference canceller, wherein the received signal is supplied as the input signal of the adaptive circuit.
In some aspects of the invention, the result from the arithmetic unit is additionally supplied to a slicer that slices the result, yielding a sliced signal which is subtracted from the received signal by another arithmetic unit, to generate a signal that can be used (e.g. via a switch) as the input signal to the adaptive circuit, thereby to implement a feedback noise-predictive narrowband interference canceler. The switch when opened, results in operation of the circuit as the above-described feed-forward noise-predictive narrowband interference canceler. The adaptive circuit and the tone predictor(s) together form a narrowband interference predictor.
A remote signal sent by a transmitter is typically received at a receiver (e.g. included in a transceiver) as a received signal that includes noise, in addition to the remote signal. The noise in the received signal depends on various characteristics of the transmission medium as well as external interference. In some embodiments, the received signal is processed by a Front End Processing Circuit to cancel certain types of noise, such as echo, FEXT and NEXT, e.g. as described in a US Patent Application, with Dariush Dabiri as the first-named inventor, that is concurrently filed herewith, and co-owned as follows:
(1) “Narrowband Interference Cancellation Method and Circuit”, Ser. No. 12/952,150.
The just-described patent application is hereby incorporated by reference herein, in its entirety.
In a signal 101 that is generated by such a Front End Processing Circuit, when narrowband interference is present, it may appear as peaks in the frequency domain, e.g. see peaks 102 and 103 illustrated in
Referring to
Frequency ω1 that can be changed adaptively over time is initially identified to circuit 100 by a coefficient θi that is input to circuit 100. Coefficient θi may be generated in any manner that would be readily apparent to the skilled artisan in view of this disclosure. In an illustrative aspect of the invention, coefficient θi is generated by a coarse estimator of the type described in either one or both US patent applications, with Dariush Dabiri as the first-named inventor, that are concurrently filed herewith, and co-owned as follows:
(2) “Confirmation of Presence of Narrowband Interference By Harmonic Analysis”, Ser. No. 12/952,172; and
(3) “Detection and Estimation of Narrowband Interference By Matrix Multiplication”, Ser. No. 12/952,164.
The just-described two patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein, in their entirety.
Referring to
In some aspects of the invention, circuit 110 is designed to generate multiple predicted tone signals, to address situations wherein multiple tones of NBI are present in the input signal on line 111 (
Referring to
Depending on the environment, noise in the input signal (on line 111) may be present at multiple unknown frequencies (estimated by circuit 100 to be ω1, ω2 etc) that may or may not be independent of each other. In certain aspects of the invention, there are two additional frequencies ω2, ω3 which are harmonics (e.g. second harmonic and third harmonic) of an estimated frequency ω1 (called “fundamental frequency”), and these three frequencies are all identified by circuit 100, for example as described in a concurrently filed, co-owned patent application entitled “Adaptive Spectral Enhancement and Harmonic Separation” filed by Dariush Dabiri, Ser. No. 12/952,178, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
To recapitulate the description so far, circuit 100, buffer 210, tone predictor(s) 211 and 212 operate together as a narrowband interference predictor 220 in accordance with the invention, to track multiple tones of NBI on an input signal on line 111, separate them out, and use the results to predict corresponding tone signals at a current time t, sum them up and supply the summation result as a predicted signal on a line 221. For example, predicted signal φ1p+φ2p+φ3p generated from three-tone NBI embedded in a received signal on line 111 is supplied on line 221 in an illustrative aspect of the invention, as illustrated in
In the illustrative aspect of the invention shown in
Moreover, a result generated by arithmetic unit 231 is supplied (either directly or indirectly) to a decoder 236 for decoding, and the decoded result is then supplied to a media access controller (MAC) 237 for further processing in conformance with a predetermined communication protocol, such as Ethernet. Furthermore, in an illustrative aspect of the invention, decoder 236 is implemented as an iterative decoder that uses low density parity check (LDPC) codes. Depending on various aspects of the invention, front end processor 234, hybrid 235, decoder 236 and MAC 237 can be configured and operated in many different ways, as would be readily apparent to the skilled artisan, in view of this disclosure.
Note that the word “coupled” is used herein to mean connected, either directly or indirectly through one or more circuits. Therefore, in the immediately preceding paragraph, front end processor 234 being coupled to hybrid 235 means either a direct connection therebetween or an indirect connection through other circuit(s).
In some aspects of the invention, the received signal on line 232 is supplied as the input signal on line 111, and therefore, adaptive circuit 100, tone predictor(s) 211, 212, and arithmetic unit 231, are operable in combination with one another as a feed-forward narrowband interference predictor in certain aspects of the invention, wherein the received signal is supplied as the input signal of the adaptive circuit.
In many aspects of the invention, the result from arithmetic unit 231 (also called “first” arithmetic unit) is supplied to a slicer 238 that slices the result, yielding a sliced signal that in turn is supplied to a switch 239. Slicer 238 may be configured and operated in many different ways, as would be readily apparent to the skilled artisan, in view of this disclosure. In an illustrative aspect of the invention, slicer 238 is configured to generate a modulated (e.g. PAM) signal, as the sliced signal. For example, slicer 238 may be implemented as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,580,482, that is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Referring to
In some aspects of the invention, adaptive circuit 100 of
Note that portions −φ2 and −φ3 are obtained by respective filters 137 and 138 operating at respective frequencies ω2 and ω3 to enhance a first tone notched signal y−φ1, or a version thereof scaled by (1/ρ) wherein ρ is the bandwidth. First tone notched signal y−φ1 is generated by a notching circuit 115A that receives input signal y and an enhanced portion −φ1 (see
Adaptation circuit 120 includes a gradient filter 410 that receives the enhanced portion −φ1 generated by IIR filter 131 and a coefficient update circuit 420 that receives the cascaded-notched signal y−φ1−φ2−φ3 and generates a coefficient signal 8 used to center the frequency of IIR filter 131. In the illustrative aspect of the invention shown in
Referring to
In several embodiments, a Δt that is used for φ2 and φ3 is different from Δt1 used for φ1 because the time required for signal propagation includes IIR filters 137 and 138 in addition. Hence, corresponding pairs of time-delayed portions φ2(t) and φ2(t−Δt2) for the second harmonic are similarly predicted in tone predictor 212 and time-delayed portions φ3(t) and φ3(t−Δt3) the third harmonic are similarly predicted in tone predictor 213, and these values are used to perform corresponding LMS updates. Note that the equations for φ2(t−Δt2) and φ3(t−Δt3) are same as the equation for φ1(t−Δt1), except that Δt2 and Δt3 are used. Specifically, tone predictor 212 computes the predicted tone φ2p for the second harmonic as follows: a21*φ2(t)+a22*φ2(t−Δt2) and tone predictor 213 computes the predicted tone φ3p for the third harmonic as follows: a31*φ3(t)+a32*φ3(t−Δt2).
The just-described computations (for each of three values of initial subscript namely values 1, 2, 3) are implemented in some aspects of the invention as illustrated in
In tone predictor 400 (
As illustrated in
Specifically LMS update circuit 460 includes delay elements 465 and 466 that respectively receive the signals φ(t) and φ(t−Δt) from input line 401 and delay element 451. LMS update circuit 460 also includes multipliers 461 and 462 that respectively receive signals φ(t−Δt) and φ(t−2Δt) from delay elements 465 and 466 and generate the products e*φ(t−Δt) and e*φ(t−2Δt) respectively which are in turn supplied to multipliers 463 and 464. Multipliers 463 and 464 scale the products e*φ(t−Δt) and e*φ(t−2Δt) with a scaling factor (μ/M) which is an input to LMS update circuit 460. The specific scaling factor and the manner in which it is generated for use by multipliers 463 and 464 is different in different aspects of the invention. Hence, computation of the scaling factor is not further described herein, as it will be readily apparent to the skilled artisan in view of this disclosure. In tone predictor 400 shown in
Accumulator 456 includes an adder 471 that receives the product (μ/M)*e*φ(t−Δt) and adds to it a value of a1 used in the immediately preceding iteration, and supplies the sum to a delay element 469. The value of a1 for the next iteration is supplied by delay element 469 on a line 475 that is coupled to the above-described multiplier 454. Similarly, accumulator 466 includes an adder 472 that receives the (μ/M)*e*φ(t−2Δt) and adds to it a value of a2 from the immediately preceding iteration, and supplies the sum to delay element 470. The value of a2 for the next iteration is supplied by delay element 470 on a line 476 that is coupled to the above-described multiplier 456.
Accumulators 456 and 466 are initialized with corresponding initial values of a1 and a2 that are computed based on a coefficient θi which is generated by a coarse frequency estimator, as an initial estimate of the fundamental frequency of NBI. The initial values of a1 and a2 can be computed in different ways in different aspects of the invention. For example, in one illustrative implementation, a2 is set to 1 as the initial value, and a1 is computed as −2*cos θi wherein θi is an estimate (as described above) of the normalized NBI frequency, in radians. Computation of initial values of a1 and a2 is not further described herein, as it will be readily apparent to the skilled artisan in view of this disclosure.
Although linear extrapolation is used in some aspects of the invention, other types of extrapolation (e.g. quadratic) may be used in other aspects of the invention.
In one illustrative aspect of the invention, the narrowband interference predictor 220 of
In some embodiments of the invention, perform a method (see
Embodiments of the type described herein may be used to implement 10 GBASE-T PHYs of the type described in a Preliminary Product Brief document entitled “Triveni Dual/Quad Port 10 GBASE-T PHY” published July 2010 by AMCC that is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and available at the following address on the Internet, wherein forward slash has been replaced by “%” sign. http:%%www.appliedmicro.com%MyAMCC%retrieveDocument%MXD%TechDocs%AP M9xxxx%APM96892—93—94—95%APM96892—93—94—95_Triveni_PB2162.pdf
One or more circuits and/or methods described herein may be implemented and/or performed in various ways. For example, one or more features and/or circuit elements and/or method steps/acts described above and/or illustrated in
Therefore, numerous modifications and adaptations of the embodiments and aspects described herein will become apparent to the skilled artisan in view of this disclosure. Numerous modifications and adaptations of the embodiments and aspects described herein are encompassed by the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority under 35 USC §119 (e) from a provisional application, namely U.S. Application No. 61/399,720 filed on Jul. 14, 2010 having the title “EMI cancellation method and apparatus”, filed by Dariush Dabiri, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5694437 | Yang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6751255 | Reuven et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6904443 | White | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6976044 | Kilani | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7003094 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7741921 | Ismailov | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20030165205 | Chu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050002474 | Limberg | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060256898 | Popper et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070009011 | Coulson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080069258 | Arad | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080112525 | Do et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080267392 | Raheja et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090061808 | Higgins | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090238102 | Dabiri | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252234 | Samdani et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 61/399,720, pp. 49. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,154, pp. 49. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,164, pp. 35. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,172, pp. 28. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,178, pp. 40. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,150, pp. 52. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/952,193, pp. 35. |
Ungerboeck, G. “10GBASE-T Coding and Modulation: 128-DSQ + LDPC”, IEEE P802.3an Task Force, Ottawa, Sep. 29-Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 15. |
“802.3an-2006 IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements, Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access With Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications”, Sep. 2006, pp. 167. |
Stolle, R. “Electromagnetic Coupling of Twisted Pair Cables”, published in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 20, No. 5, Jun. 2002, pp. 883-891. |
Nehorai, A. et al., “Adaptive Comb Filtering for Harmonic Signal Enhancement”, published in IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-34, No. 5, Oct. 1986, pp. 1124-1138. |
Nehorai, A. “A Minimal Parameter Adaptive Notch Filter With Constrained Poles and Zeros”, published in IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-33, No. 4, Aug. 1985, pp. 983-996. |
Stoica, P. et al. “Performance Analysis of an Adaptive Notch Filter with Constrained Poles and Zeros”, published in IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 36, No. 6, Jun. 1988, pp. 911-919. |
MacLeod, M.D. “Fast Nearly ML Estimation of the Parameters of Real or Complex Single Tones or Resolved Multiple Tones”, published in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 1998, pp. 141-148. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120014487 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61399720 | Jul 2010 | US |