The present application is a national phase application of PCT application PCT/EP2009/004561 filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §371, which claims priority to EP 08012021.5, filed Jul. 3, 2008. The foregoing PCT and EP applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present invention relates to an acoustic, adaptive noise generating device that is suitable for increasing people's powers of concentration in acoustically difficult surroundings.
Flat-panel loudspeakers as such have been known for a long time, for example from DE 484 872. In the case of a flat-panel loudspeaker, a moving coil working on the electrodynamic principle is used and it is placed directly on a surface—in principle, initially of any desired size and thickness and consisting of a chosen material—and mechanically fixed thereon. If the moving coil is electrically excited by a source of sound, its vibrations are transmitted to the surface acting as a diaphragm and this surface is thus itself used as a sound-radiating surface. For an electroacoustic transducer of this generic type, there would actually be a large number of possible uses. However, if to date it has not gained widespread acceptance, apart from a few exceptions, this is due to its electroacoustic properties, in particular its transfer function.
The mechanical properties of the sound-radiating surface are important. This surface can only transmit tones or sounds when it mechanically vibrates. Apart from the mounting, i.e. the mechanical support and the place where the moving coil is fixed on it, a plate-shaped surface that is excited preferably to vibrate flexurally is in its vibration response actually already a relatively complex structure. While in the case of a commercially available loudspeaker working on the electrodynamic principle it is still largely within one's control to optimize the sound-radiating diaphragm with regard to its acoustic properties, albeit with compromises, this is not readily possible in the case of a flat-panel loudspeaker. This problem may be illustrated by means of an example: If a glass surface of a show window, on which surface a moving coil is placed, is used as a flat-panel loudspeaker, the material, shape and dimensions of the sound-radiating surface, as well as its mounting, are substantially fixed. The frequency response of the flat-panel loudspeaker in this example is thus substantially predetermined. Typically, the natural resonances of the surface utilized for the sound radiation with this material and given the dimensions of the show window cause a frequency response which is to be described—simplified—by an excessive reproduction in the range of low tones and furthermore by a rattling tendency, which is due to the influence of higher-order natural resonances still lying in the audible range. Corresponding characteristic nonlinearities also occur with other materials, such as wood or plastic materials.
As is known, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 3,728,497, U.S. Pat. No. 3,636,281 or U.S. Pat. No. 3,449,531, efforts have been made to overcome the known disadvantages of the flat-panel loudspeaker by means of constructional measures. It has been possible to achieve certain improvements in this manner, but a fundamental solution which would have opened up a wide range of applications for the flat-panel loudspeaker has not yet been achieved by the attempts made to date.
From psychoacoustics, it is known that for intellectual work there is an increased degree of difficulty when the noise level in the working environment is increased. A further aspect is working in a room with several people sitting close to another when they are having conversations at the same time, as occurs for example in a call centre. Here, it is very disturbing when the neighbor's voice can be clearly understood. Unintentionally overhearing the contents of other people's conversations greatly affects one's own powers of concentration when doing intellectual work. Simply by not being able to clearly understand these voices will increase the quality of work owing to the improved intellectual concentration.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides a system or a mask that enables effective damping of disturbing sounds, in particular in the case of difficult and reverberant acoustics.
According to some embodiments of the invention, an adaptive noise generating device in the form of a flat-panel loudspeaker includes at least one actuator arranged on a carrier panel excitable by vibrations. The emitted noise signals of the at least one actuator are adjustable via at least one control/regulating device that is connected to the actuator. With the flat panel loudspeaker according to some embodiments of the invention, sound radiation takes place from the flat panel loudspeaker to the surrounding area. Therefore, it is a so-called “open system”.
In some embodiments, an amplifier for amplifying the signals coming from the control/regulating device is arranged between the control/regulating device and the actuator.
With regard to some embodiments of the control/regulating device, several alternative embodiments are conceivable here. Firstly, in some embodiments, the control/regulating device includes at least one manually adjustable switch. It is thus possible, if desired by the user, to switch on a noise preset having a randomly adjustable amplitude.
In some embodiments, the control device includes a computer, in the memory of which are stored different noise sound characteristics that can be freely selectable or altered via a preset program.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, a microphone that records dominant acoustic signals and relays them to the computer is connected upstream of the computer. In some embodiments, an analysis of these signals takes place in the computer, in which analysis the noise signal emitted is adaptable according to a preset algorithm, depending on the ambient loudness.
In some embodiments, the noise signals can be provided by a data base. This data base may also be externally arranged, so that a large number of adaptive noise generating devices can be supplied with the necessary signal by means of a data base. The noise signals are in this case transmitted from the data base to the control/regulating unit.
In some embodiments, the control/regulating unit is equipped with a transmitter or receiver and thus is controllable via radio or via infrared. The counterpart, from which the control signals are emitted, can in this case be a remote control or else a data base or computer.
In some embodiments, the carrier panel is connected to an acoustic insulating material. The acoustic insulating material is applied on the opposite side of the carrier panel on which the actuator is arranged. In some embodiments, the acoustic insulating material is connected all over the whole surface of the carrier panel. Thus, on the one hand, passive sound damping takes place, and on the other hand, the existing sound can be further actively counteracted by the actuator. In some embodiments, the acoustic insulating material is in this case selected from mineral wool, gypsum foam, melamine resin foam, polyurethane foam, aluminium foam, hemp wool, non-woven fabrics and/or felt materials.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, the acoustic insulating material is covered by a covering material that is electronically excitable so that it illuminates, thus enabling an illumination of the covering material. The illumination of the covering material may in this case be varied over the entire color spectrum. In some embodiments, the color of the illumination is controllable via a central computer unit, so that specific colors can be separately set or else a continuous variation over the entire color spectrum is possible.
In some embodiments, the carrier panel according to the invention is configured as a wall panel, floor panel, furniture panel, room divider, cabinet panel and/or partition wall.
The present invention is explained in more detail with the aid of the attached figures, without limiting the invention to the parameters and specific embodiments illustrated in the figures.
In
It is immediately obvious to a person skilled in the art of technical acoustics that the acoustic properties of the flat-panel loudspeaker 1 are determined, inter alia, by the properties of the sound-radiating carrier 2, its shape, the size of its surface, its thickness and above all also its mechanical properties, but also the configuration of the actuator 3 and its local arrangement on the sound-radiating carrier 2. Since, for example, completely different materials may be used for the sound-radiating carrier 2, a problem arises already from the choice of materials. For it depends on whether the flat-panel loudspeaker 1 exhibits high damping, as in the case of wood materials, in particular in the higher-frequency range, or on the other hand, as for example in the case of glass and also plastics, in the low-frequency range, and in the latter case reproduces high-frequency components excessively and thus tends to rattle. Owing to this problem, flat-panel loudspeakers have hitherto not gained acceptance in a large number of fundamentally possible applications, even though the principles for them have been known for a long time, because other electroacoustic transducers whose frequency response can be corrected more simply are known.
In some embodiments, the actuator 3 is connected to an audio amplifier 5 that receives its audio signals, such as, for example, noise signals, from a control or regulating device 4. This control device may have, for example, a storage medium 10, which may be a CD player for example.
In some embodiments, the system is adaptively designed and, depending on the difference of the insulating material 9 applied to the vibrating panel 2, emits different noise signals, taking into account the acoustic damping of the panel, in order to be able to emit in each case an identical noise signal with identical character.
In some embodiments, different noise signals may be locally switchable at the vibrating panel 2, for example via suitable switches 4a, the same sound characteristic being producible or for all embodiments the same subjective sound sensation being perceptible, always taking into account and correcting the acoustic damping properties of the material 9 applied to the panel 2. The amplitude of the acoustic signals is also adjustable via the switches 4a.
Furthermore, the control device 4 is connected, for example via a stationary USB connection 8, to a computing unit or a data base 6, via which the control unit 4 and/or the amplifier 5 can be controlled. Likewise, it is possible for acoustic signals, such as, for example, noise signals, which can be stored in the computing unit or the data base 6, to be fed into the control device 4. In some embodiments, the control device 4 is a microcontroller.
Also illustrated in
In
Thus, the acoustic signals to be delivered by the actuator can be actively controlled via the computer unit 4b and the control device 4 with regard to their frequency spectrum and their loudness, depending on the ambient acoustics recorded by the microphone. In this case, just as already in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08012021 | Jul 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/004561 | 6/24/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/13/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/000411 | 1/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3449531 | Ashworth | Jun 1969 | A |
3636281 | Cozart | Jan 1972 | A |
3728497 | Komatsu | Apr 1973 | A |
4098370 | McGregor et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4214298 | Propst et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4953220 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5692053 | Fuller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5719945 | Fuller et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5748748 | Fischer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5781640 | Nicolino, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6545418 | Kolpasky et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
7283636 | Nishimura et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7689198 | Deng et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20060147051 | Smith et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080144850 | Abe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090208025 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100284546 | DeBrunner et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
484872 | Feb 1929 | DE |
JP0083718 | Jul 1983 | EP |
0335153 | Oct 1989 | EP |
1740014 | Jan 2007 | EP |
4113946 | Apr 1992 | JP |
2005280546 | Oct 2005 | JP |
WO9709842 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO0167808 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO2005096310 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2008013184 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 08012021, completed Sep. 17, 2008, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/EP2009/004561, Aug. 11, 2009, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110211721 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |