The present exemplary embodiments relate to printing systems and, in particular, printing devices which utilize a supply of colored inks to be communicated to a print head for document printing. More particularly, the present embodiments utilize solid ink sticks as the supply ink, which must be heated to a liquid form before being capable of communication to the print head. Such systems are commercially available under the PHASER® mark from Xerox Corporation.
The present embodiments concern the structure, control system and operation methods of the heater element for causing a phase change in the solid ink supply to a liquid form capable of fluid communication to a print head for document printing.
The basic operation of such phasing print systems comprises the melting of a solid ink stick, its communication to a reservoir for interim storage, and then a supply process from the reservoir to a print head for printing of a document. The object of the control strategy is to avoid the printing system running out of ink while trying to print, because such an event can be a catastrophic failure to the system. Prior known systems will typically supply a measuring device in the reservoir to monitor ink levels therein. When the ink drops below a certain level due to normal usage, then the ink supply control system would melt more of the solid ink supply until the reservoir would refill to the desired level. The steps of asking for more ink, turning on the melter to melt the solid ink, delivering the ink to the reservoir to a desired level and then turning the heater off is commonly referred to as an “ink melt duty cycle.” It is an operating feature of such systems that as the frequency of melt duty cycle changes, the flow rate characteristics of the heating system will correspondingly change. For higher frequency duty cycles, the melt rate goes up; for lower frequencies, the melt rate goes down.
Conventional systems used a fixed applied power supply to the heater that was predetermined to provide a desired melt rate, but since only one level of applied power was available, the actual melt rate could vary depending upon consequential ambient variant conditions or varying printing operations, i.e., a high demand of certain ink color versus a low demand of another ink color would result in different frequencies of the melt duty cycles for the different colors. Where the printing system is printing an unusually large amount of a particular color, the corresponding increase in frequency of the ink melt duty cycle similarly may have a consequence on the desired flow rate, that is, the supply ink may be heated to a higher temperature than normally expected before the start of a next duty cycle due to failure to have enough cool down times between the cycles. Additionally, it is not unusual for such printing systems to be employed in out of office environments such as in an unheated storage warehouse in a colder location to an uncooled airplane hangar in a desert location. Extreme ambient temperature conditions such as these examples can have an effect on the flow rate in a heating process where the heating element receives only a single level of applied power.
There is a need for an improved adaptive control system for the power supply for such ink melt heaters that can avoid the variances of ink melt rates resulting from consequential variant conditions. Improved precision in ink flow rate control provides consequent efficiencies in ink handling, i.e., less heat losses, smaller reservoir requirements and less heating of ink therein over shorter periods of time. The present exemplary embodiments satisfy this need as well as others to provide an adaptive power control system for ink melt heaters in phasing printing systems that can provide a substantially uniform ink melt rate. However, it is to be appreciated that the present exemplary embodiments are also amenable to other like applications where the supply of power to the heating element needs to be adjusted for enhanced control of items heated by the heater element.
A method and system is provided for selectively controlling supplied power to an ink melt heater for maintaining a desired ink melt rate despite a varying ambient parameter affecting an actual melt rate. A predetermined amount of power is initially supplied to the ink melt heater intended to cause the desired ink melt rate. An ambient parameter is detected to the ink melt heater that will likely have a consequential effect on a desired ink melt rate in view of the predetermined amount of power supplied to the ink melt heater. If the detected ambient parameter is determined to cause enough of a variance in the actual melt rate from the desired ink melt rate, the supplied power is adjusted from the predetermined amount to an adjusted amount for realizing the desired ink melt rate. The ambient parameter may comprise sensing a factor representative of either local environmental air temperature or ink temperature adjacent to the ink melt heater.
With reference to
With particular reference to
It is an advantageous feature of the present embodiments that a more uniform ink melt rate can be achieved for the filling of the reservoir 44 from the loader assembly 10 by adaptive power control of the ink melt heater 16. Such adaptive power control will make the ink melt rate largely independent of frequency variations in the ink melt duty cycle, starting ink temperatures of the solid ink stick 14 and local ambient temperature variations.
The present embodiment comprises an algorithm that monitors the ink temperature and/or local ambient temperature, next to the heater and computes a correction coefficient that adjusts the supply power to the heater prior to the melt cycle.
The amount of applied heater power which is desired to be applied by the system 20 to the heating element 16 is a function of convection losses plus the energy to melt/mass ratio multiplied by a desired melt rate. By convection losses is meant the heater power losses to the local environment which is a function of local ambient temperatures (referred to in
As noted above, the preferred embodiments comprise a smart algorithm that delivers precisely the amount of energy as needed for each melt cycle depending on the current ambient temperature and bulk supply ink temperature. To correct for the ink starting temperature, an ink temperature correction factor (ITCF) is applied, which is calculated as follows:
ITCF=1−Cp*Mf*(Ts−Ta)/(Heater Power* % Power Applied) (1)
To correct for the local ambient temperature effect, an environmental temperature correction factor (ETCF) is computed as follows:
ETCF=1−Ha*(100−Ta)/(Heater Power* % Power Applied) Ha=(Heater Power* % Power Applied−Mf*heat of melt/mass of ink from Ta)/(100−Ta) (2)
The corrected power to the heater thus comprises ITCF*ETCF*Heater Power* % Power Applied. Full cool down time from an ink duty cycle is approximately 45 minutes to an hour. In the present embodiment, the thermistor device is assumed to read the ambient temperature from the ink melt heater plate when the heater has not been powered in the last 45 minutes from a previous duty cycle.
With particular reference to
With reference to
It can be seen that the subject embodiments comprise detecting an ambient parameter to the heater plate device which will affect the actual melt rate of the ink stick when power is applied to the plate for the melting of the solid ink. It is only when the detected ambient parameter is perceived to cause a variance in the actual ink melt rate from the desired ink melt rate that the power to the heater plate needs to be adjusted. In the present embodiments the parameters that are monitored have been illustrated to comprise ambient temperature to the system or an increased temperature of the solid ink stick engaging the plate due to the lack of full cool down time to the system. A timer is disposed within the control circuit 20 for timing the elapsed time from a completion of a previous melt cycle. When the timer has not timed out a proper cool down elapsed time, it is assumed that the thermistor is detecting the starting temperature of the ink stick. The thermistor detects ambient temperature after the timer has timed out the cool down period.
The exemplary embodiments have been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the exemplary embodiments be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4593292 | Lewis | Jun 1986 | A |
4607266 | DeBonte | Aug 1986 | A |
4627740 | Jerde et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
5235350 | Lin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5406315 | Allen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5406325 | Parulski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5424767 | Alavizadeh et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5771054 | Dudek et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5920330 | Ikezaki | Jul 1999 | A |
5992991 | Kanemoto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6196672 | Ito et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227641 | Nishikori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6276790 | Ikezaki | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293638 | McDonald | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6554386 | Classens et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7118205 | Jones et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020063762 | Haan et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61287769 | Dec 1986 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050140713 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |