The described embodiments relate generally to manufacturing an electronic device. In particular, the present embodiments relate to providing a corrective action or step to a device during manufacturing or assembly of the electronic device.
Recent advances in manufacturing an electronic device allow for improved production times. This leads to additional electronic devices produced per time. During assembly, some parts of the electronic device provide a mounting surface for other structures. These surfaces are considered “critical” in that they must be manufactured within a specified tolerance in order for another structure to properly mount on the surface of the part.
However, when the surface is not within the specified tolerance, several issues may occur. For example, a part having mounting surfaces with disturbances (e.g., protrusions, bumps, burrs) left after machining the part may lead to an adhesive layer unable to flow or extend along the mounting surface in a desired manner which may cause the part to be improperly attached to the mounting surface. One issues associated with this is a display not properly attaching to a mounting surface of a lid (enclosure). When this occurs, light from light source (e.g., LED, display) may “leak,” that is, light may pass through unwanted or unintended portions of the electronic device. Light leakage passing through a top portion of the device is generally viewed as undesirable by a user, as well as an inefficient use of a light source. In order to prevent the user from using the device, the device may be discarded after a valuable component (e.g., display) has been installed, thereby increasing yield fallout of the electronic device.
Another issue associated with mounting surfaces out of tolerance is a hinge assembly on, for example, a portable electronic device. A hinge assembly on an uneven surface affects the kinematics of the electronic device. For example, a lid may not properly open and close with respect to a base portion.
In one aspect, a method for providing a corrective action to an enclosure of an electronic device is described. The method may include scanning the enclosure with an automated inspection system, the automated inspection system capable of locating a dimension of the enclosure. In some embodiments, the dimension may not within a predetermined tolerance of the enclosure. The method may further include forming a comparison between the dimension and the predetermined tolerance. The method may further include sending the comparison to a tool. In some embodiments, the comparison may signal a tool to perform the corrective action to the dimension based on the comparison. Also, in some embodiments, performing the corrective action to the dimension causes the dimension to be least within the predetermined tolerance.
In another aspect, a method for assembling an electronic device is described. The method may include performing a first adjustment to a first surface of a first component. The first adjustment may remove a protrusion of the first surface. The method may further include performing a second adjustment to a second surface of the first component. The second adjustment may add a material to the second surface such that the second surface is approximately even, or level. The method may further include attaching a second component to the first surface of the first component. The method may further include attaching a third component to the second surface of the first component. In some embodiments, the first adjustment and the second adjustment are located by an automated inspection system.
In another aspect, a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to implement a method for providing a corrective action to an enclosure of an electronic device is described. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium may include computer code for scanning the enclosure with an automated inspection system, the automated inspection system capable of locating a dimension of the enclosure. In some embodiments, the dimension may not within a predetermined tolerance of the enclosure. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium may also further include computer code for forming a comparison between the dimension and the predetermined tolerance. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium may further include computer code sending the comparison to a tool. In some embodiments, the comparison may signal a tool to perform the corrective action to the dimension based on the comparison. Also, in some embodiments, the computer code performing the corrective action to the dimension causes the dimension to be least within the predetermined tolerance.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the embodiments will be, or will become, apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description and this summary, be within the scope of the embodiments, and be protected by the following claims.
The disclosure will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
Those skilled in the art will appreciate and understand that, according to common practice, various features of the drawings discussed below are not necessarily drawn to scale, and that dimensions of various features and elements of the drawings may be expanded or reduced to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention described herein.
Reference will now be made in detail to representative embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the following descriptions are not intended to limit the embodiments to one preferred embodiment. To the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be included within the spirit and scope of the described embodiments as defined by the appended claims.
In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the description and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in accordance with the described embodiments. Although these embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the described embodiments, it is understood that these examples are not limiting such that other embodiments may be used, and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the described embodiments.
The following disclosure relates to a localized corrective action of a component of an electronic device. In particular, some components have surfaces are configured to mate with another component of the electronic device. Issues arise when these surfaces are not within a specified tolerance. For example, an electronic device having a bump or burr on a mounting surface where a display is adhesively attached may lead to light leakage at the interface region between the display and the mounting surface. This is due in part to the display not contacting all portions of the mounting surface. Conversely, a mounting surface having a pit or an uneven surface may leads to a similar issue.
While some of these issues are a result of the machining process of the component itself, in some cases, components originally within an acceptable tolerance or specification limit may become out of tolerance during an assembly process. For example, a component may initially have a mating surface within 50 microns (from one of edge of a surface to another edge) and co-planar within 0.5 degrees, both of which may be within acceptable tolerance ranges. However, adding other components to the component with the mating surface may experience a co-planarity well above 0.5 degrees. When the mating surface is configured to receive, for example, a hinge assembly, the hinge assembly may no longer function properly.
Rather than discarding the assembled components, a localized corrective action can be done to the mounting surface during assembly and before the display is adhesively attached. For example, a lid having a mounting surface configured to receive a display may be inspected to determine whether the mounting surface is within the specified tolerance. If the inspection determines a disturbance (e.g., bump, burr, and pit) causes the lid not to be within the specified tolerance, the disturbance may be removed. If the inspection determines a pit or an uneven surface causes the lid not to be within the specified tolerance, the pit or uneven surface may be filled with, for example, a resin. In either event, the mounting surface treated with the localized corrective action causes the mounting surface to be within the specified tolerance. In this manner, the disturbance is corrected and losses due to yield fallout of the component are minimized.
These and other embodiments are discussed below with reference to
An illustrative electronic device 100 (e.g., a portable electronic device) in a closed configuration is shown in
In closed configuration, lid 106 and base 104 may form what appears to be a uniform structure having a continuously varying and coherent shape that enhances both the look and feel of electronic device 100. Lid 106 may include an indicium 108. In some embodiments, indicium 108 is a logo having a transparent or translucent portion through which light passes. Also, base 104 can be pivotally connected to lid 106 to allow for opening and closing of electronic device 100.
Lid 106 may include display trim 116 that surrounds display 110. Display trim 116 can be formed of an opaque material such as ink deposited on top of or within a protective layer of display 110. Thus, display trim 116 can enhance the overall appearance of display 110 by hiding operational and structural components as well as focusing attention onto the active area of the display.
Display 110 can display visual content such as a graphical user interface, still images such as photos as well as video media items such as movies. Display 110 can display images using any appropriate technology such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), a light emitting diode (LED) display, an organic light emitting diode (OLED) display, etc. Further, electronic device 100 may include image capture device 118. In one embodiment, image capture device 118 may be located on a transparent portion of display trim 116. Image capture device 118 can be configured to capture both still and video images in some embodiments.
Base 104 may include top case 120. As illustrated in
Further, base 104 may include bottom case 122. Top case 120 and bottom case 122 of base 104 may cooperate to receive various other electronic and mechanical components therebetween. As may be understood, by way of example, the electronic components may include a mass storage device (e.g., a hard drive or a solid state storage device such as a flash memory device including non-transitory and tangible memory that may be, for example, volatile and/or non-volatile memory) configured to store information, data, files, applications, instructions or the like, a processor (e.g., a microprocessor or controller) configured to control the overall operation of the portable electronic device, a communication interface configured for transmitting and receiving data through, for example, a wired or wireless network such as a local area network (LAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), and/or a wide area network (WAN), for example, the Internet, a fan, a heat pipe, and one or more batteries.
Although first surface 140, second surface 230, and third surface 160 are generally level or flat, the machining process used to produce these surfaces may leave behind unwanted material. Alternatively, these surface may become warped or simply out of a specified tolerance during an assembly process. For example,
Also,
In order locate (and subsequently remove or reduce) deviating portions, an inspection system may be used to inspect lid 106 for protrusions.
In the embodiment shown in
In the exemplary embodiment, the predetermined tolerance is third radius of curvature 216. As shown in
Once a protrusion is located by vision system 204, the protrusion may be removed by a removal tool.
In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, removal tool 220 traverses along lid 106 to a location in which a protrusion is detected. In other embodiments, removal tool 220 is generally stationary, but includes a movable head configured to direct laser beam 212 to a location in which a protrusion is detected. Also, it should be noted that ablation times depends on the number of protrusion found as well as the size of the protrusions. Regarding the latter, ablation time is proportional to the height of the protrusion. In other words, a relatively longer ablation times is associated with a protrusion having a relatively greater height. Ablation time may also be dependent upon whether the protrusion is completely removed.
In addition to locating protrusions or irregularities on mounting surfaces configured to receive a display, the inspection system can be used to detect other types of irregularities in other portions of a lid. For example,
In some embodiments, removal tool 220 removes portions of second surface 230 such that second surface 230 is approximately at first height 232 (i.e., the portion of second surface having the lowest height) across the entire area of second surface 230. Still, in other embodiments, the inspection system can select a reference surface on second surface 230 and signal removal tool 220 to remove a portion of a second surface 230 in accordance with the reference surface. In other words, after the removal process, second surface 230 is substantially co-planar, or flush, with respect to the reference surface. For example,
Once the removal process previously described is performed, lid 106 may be placed back in the inspection system previously for further inspection (i.e., second scan) to determine whether the removal process places lid 106 with the predetermined tolerance. If the inspection system determines, for example, all surfaces are within their predetermined tolerances, lid 106 may proceed to the next step. For example, a display may be adhesively attached to lid 106. On the other hand, if lid 106 fails the inspection, lid 106 can undergo further removal process until a subsequent inspection by the inspection system indicates a pass. It should be understood that a “pass” or “fail” corresponds to whether lid 106 is within a predetermined tolerance or other acceptable measure. This approach ensures that a high-value component (e.g., display) is not adhesively attached to lid 106 until lid 106 includes acceptable mounting surfaces. This process improves quality control by not only reducing light leakage but also reducing yield fallout.
Also, after lid 106 pass the inspection, lid 106 may be placed in a cleanroom environment (not shown) for further processing. The cleanroom may be used to remove any ablated material or other debris generated by the removal tool previously described in order to ensure the surface (e.g., mounting surface) is capable of receiving another part (e.g., display, hinge assembly) in a desired manner. The removal means in the cleanroom environment may include an air knife, air blade, and/or an air nozzle connected to an air supply. Also, the cleanroom environment may include a sealed hood to control airflow within the cleanroom environment.
In addition to protrusions, other irregularities may be present on a mating surface. For example, prior to assembly, a part such as a lid may have an associated flatness, or alternatively, at least two portions of a part may have an associated co-planarity with respect to each other that is acceptable for use. However, during assembly, the previously acceptable parts mated or assembled with another component or components causes a change in flatness or co-planarity such that the part no longer includes a surface with acceptable flatness or co-planarity. The inspection and removal process previously described may be used to remove portions of surfaces such that the parts are again with an acceptable flatness or co-planarity.
Also, in some cases, during the manufacturing process of a part (e.g., lid 106), the part may be purposely machined or manufactured with additional material on certain portions (e.g., mounting surfaces). In this regard, the part will purposely be put through a removal process (e.g., laser ablation) prior to mating with another part. Any issues with excessive removal may be solved by the thickness of the adhesive layer used to mate the two parts and/or a material (e.g., resin) use to build up, or add to, the mounting surface (discussed below). Using an inspection system and removal tool previously described, both of which include relatively tight tolerance controls, may require less attention to detail with respect to machining the part. In this regard, less time spent machining or forming the part may be acceptable as the tightly controlled inspection and removal processes may place the part in a compliant manner. In some cases, this may reduce manufacturing times and costs related to the part.
The foregoing process generally concerns removing a portion of material from a surface in order to correct and or improve the surface functionality. However, in some cases, a surface may include insufficient material caused by either during manufacture of the part, or a subsequent manufacturing process. In these cases, an additive process may be desirable.
Generally, the time required for the additive process depends at least in part on the width of the print material as well as the amount of material required to form a flush surface. In some embodiments, the printing machine (not shown) used to apply material 330 is configured to print material 330 having a width approximately in the range of 0.5 mm to 2 mm. Also, in some embodiments, material 330 includes several layers of printed material, with subsequent layers stacked on previous applied layers.
An inspection system previously described may be configured to inspect second surface 230 for uneven portions, and signal to a print head (not shown) to add print segments 350 to certain portions of second surface 230. For example in
Other portions of lid 106 may require additional material. For example,
However, offset portion 412 can be rectified by adding material in order to place indicium 108 within tolerance 198.
In addition to creating a level surface on offset portion 412, it is also important to address issues with light leakage within offset portion 162. While
Referring again to
While previous embodiments illustrate the additive process generally applied to a single surface, the additive process may also be applied to two surfaces generally perpendicular to each other. This may be useful in instances where unevenness, as detected by the inspection system, is found on more than one surface.
Similar to the removal process, the additive process can also undergo a second inspection in order to ensure the material applied to the part during additive process achieves is done so in a desired manner. For example, if the part receives a “fail,” the inspection system can further signal the print, or add, additional material.
Also, using the additive process on a part may require less time and attention to machining the part. For example, if the part is machined in a coarse manner slightly out of the predetermined tolerance, a tightly controlled additive process may be performed to place the part within the predetermined tolerances. In this regard, less time spent machining the part coupled with applying a tightly control additive process may reduce manufacturing times and costs related to the part.
Also, while the removal process and the additive process are discussed separately, in some embodiments, the inspection system is configured to send a first adjustment signal to a removal tool to remove a portion of a surface, and also send a second adjustment signal to an additive tool to add material to the surface. Alternatively, the first adjustment signal may be associated with the additive tool, followed by the second adjustment signal associated with the removal tool. In this manner, the surface is capable of receive the desired localized corrective feature in order to place the surface within a specified tolerance.
The electronic device 500 illustrates circuitry of a representative computing device. The electronic device 500 may include a processor 502 that may be microprocessor or controller for controlling the overall operation of the electronic device 500. In one embodiments, the processor 502 may be particularly configured to perform the functions described herein relating to removing a portion of a surface with a removal tool. In another embodiment, the processor 502 may be particularly configured to perform the functions described herein relating to adding a material to a surface previously described. In yet other embodiments, the processor 502 may be particularly configured to perform the functions described herein relating to removing and adding a material to a surface previously described. The electronic device 500 may also include a memory device 504. The memory device 504 is a non-transitory computer readable medium that may be, for example, volatile and/or non-volatile memory. The memory device 504 may be configured to store computer code, information, data, files, applications, instructions or the like. For example, the memory device 504 could be configured to buffer input data for processing by the processor 502. Additionally or alternatively, the memory device 504 may be configured to store instructions for execution by the processor 502.
The electronic device 500 may also include a user interface 506 that allows a user of the electronic device 500 to interact with the electronic device. For example, the user interface 506 can take a variety of forms, such as a button, keypad, dial, touch screen, audio input interface, vision/image capture input interface, input in the form of sensor data, etc. Still further, the user interface 506 may be configured to output information to the user through a display, speaker, or other output device. A communication interface 508 may provide for transmitting and receiving data through, for example, a wired or wireless network such as a local area network (LAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), and/or a wide area network (WAN), for example, the Internet.
The electronic device 500 may also include a module 510. The processor 502 may be embodied as, include or otherwise control the module 510. The molding module 510 may be configured for controlling or executing the inspection, removal, and/or additive operations as discussed herein.
In this regard, for example, in one embodiment a computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code portions stored therein is provided. The computer-executable program code portions, which may be stored in the memory device 504, may include program code (or computer code) instructions for performing the molding operations disclosed herein, including one or more of the operations described above in reference, for example to
In step 606, the comparison between the dimension and the target is sent from the inspection system to the tool. Sending the comparison may include communication to the tool such that the tool may provide the corrective action as determined by the inspection system. In some embodiments, the tool is a removal tool (e.g., laser) configured to remove a protrusion from the first surface. In some embodiments, the tool is a print head of a printing machine configured to add a material to the second surface. In step 608, the tool is signaled to perform the corrective action to the dimension based on the comparison. In some embodiments, the corrective action includes removing a protrusion from a surface. In some embodiments, the corrective action includes removing a portion of an uneven, or non-level, surface in order to make the surface even, or level. In some embodiments, the corrective action includes adding material (e.g., resin) to a surface in order build up the surface, thereby causing the surface combined with the resin to include an even, or level, surface.
Although the described embodiments cover inspection, removal, and additive steps to a lid of an electronic device, other parts of the electronic device could be inspected and corrected in a similar manner. For example, a top case 120 (shown in
The various aspects, embodiments, implementations or features of the described embodiments can be used separately or in any combination. Various aspects of the described embodiments can be implemented by software, hardware or a combination of hardware and software. The described embodiments can also be embodied as computer readable code on a computer readable storage medium for controlling manufacturing operations or as computer readable code on a computer readable storage medium for controlling a manufacturing line. The computer readable storage medium is any data storage device that can store data which can thereafter be read by a computer system. Examples of the computer readable storage medium include read-only memory, random-access memory, CD-ROMs, HDDs, DVDs, magnetic tape, and optical data storage devices. The computer readable storage medium can also be distributed over network-coupled computer systems so that the computer readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the described embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the described embodiments. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of the specific embodiments described herein are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not targeted to be exhaustive or to limit the embodiments to the precise forms disclosed. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings.
This application is a continuation of International Application PCT/US14/47763, with an international filing date of Jul. 23, 2014, entitled “ADAPTIVE PROCESSES FOR IMPROVING INTEGRITY OF SURFACES”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3554122 | Priesmeyer et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
4569092 | Baus | Feb 1986 | A |
5128829 | Loew | Jul 1992 | A |
5317792 | Tanaka | Jun 1994 | A |
5382317 | Thomas | Jan 1995 | A |
5509915 | Hanson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5776605 | May | Jul 1998 | A |
5856699 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6040846 | Stanton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6280349 | Cook | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6501554 | Hackney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6579095 | Marshall et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592040 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6612686 | Mutz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621173 | Yamakawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624225 | Ellison et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6775130 | Cronk | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6812976 | Satonaka | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6828069 | Nakazawa et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6985239 | Doucet et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995334 | Kovacevic | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7035110 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035761 | Link et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7203355 | Levi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7373852 | Boge et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7423225 | Kroll et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7503110 | Domitrovits et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7933123 | Wang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8007348 | Baratta | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029927 | Tucholski | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8175734 | Fogel et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8203083 | Song | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8236400 | Trigg et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8322267 | Altergott et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8372502 | Hill et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8395893 | Harmon et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8427817 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8525046 | Sugai | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8536889 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8614118 | Haji et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621819 | Kayani et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8828163 | Hill | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849437 | Chow et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8937689 | Prest et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9016642 | Ay et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9081428 | Liu | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9096026 | Hall et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9096372 | Vulpitta | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9158151 | Ogata et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9250651 | Cavallaro et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265294 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9308710 | Ko | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9343797 | Shoemaker et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9360643 | Rinzler et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9456131 | Tran | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9462093 | Hegemier et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9467541 | Tanaka | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9483078 | Song et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494132 | Riddell et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9510492 | Liu et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9521498 | Xu et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9527241 | Levine et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532660 | Jafa et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9545638 | Spiryagin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9579844 | Schmid et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9603752 | Brown et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9669492 | Linyaev et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9767993 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788674 | Pacione et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810923 | Stevens et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9850411 | Goubard | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9864403 | Franklin et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865176 | Tran | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9879157 | Sherman et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010032698 | Bottari | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020009221 | Hercke et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030037448 | Saksa | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040055699 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040074045 | Winstead et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040182707 | Jardemark et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050001036 | Blake et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050002016 | Tsao | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050094362 | Stephens | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111301 | Rickman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128695 | Han | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135874 | Baylis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166737 | Caluori | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186540 | Taub et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060019088 | Wang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060157697 | Nagano | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070015111 | Kopelman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047109 | Shibata et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087457 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070181456 | Kusuda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185243 | Terada et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070259988 | Dorsman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291804 | Day et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080055258 | Sauers | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080063218 | Weber et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090067125 | Xia et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090133941 | Endo | May 2009 | A1 |
20090186552 | Shinya | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100041449 | Nakao et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100113896 | Cadio et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123089 | Chen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100210745 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219542 | Tsujikawa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270052 | Crohas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100328854 | Nakao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110050053 | Deng | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114839 | Stecker et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192708 | Taniguchi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221626 | Hill | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120026163 | Koyama et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120050975 | Garelli et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088208 | Schulter et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120156501 | Campbell | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165682 | Keeney et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120218732 | Minemura et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242580 | Yamamoto | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120298929 | Mizumura et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130110469 | Kopelman | May 2013 | A1 |
20130201660 | Barbier | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215638 | Dabov et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130336814 | Kamen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140035995 | Chou et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140055600 | Ong et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140083731 | Chow et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140169607 | Goida et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140234530 | Frankenberger | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240615 | Allore | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240911 | Cole et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140328036 | Sarraf et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140358273 | LaBossiere | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150004382 | Menon et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150027000 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150051358 | Bunnelle et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150111623 | Hegemier et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150125596 | Ramakrishnan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150197062 | Shinar | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150210076 | Rivas et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150282330 | Iseda et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150295344 | Sawada et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150341478 | Bonar et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160029496 | Leggett et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160054761 | Wolff et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160150305 | Wan et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170223846 | Elolampi et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170268495 | Overson et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290533 | Antonio et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170345536 | Breiwa et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170350878 | Holmes et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0700515 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2012103933 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2014/047763 International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160026176 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2014/047763 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 14339125 | US |