This invention relates to methods and systems for monitoring therapy treatments, and more specifically to observing the effects of radiation and anatomical changes during radiotherapy treatment fractions.
While a patient undergoes radiotherapy treatment, the location, arrangement or shape of anatomical structures or organs can vary relative to the treatment coordinate system being used to delivery the therapy. This is especially true with respect to a planning stage, when a treatment plan is initially devised, and when they are set up for each treatment fraction (commonly referred to as interfractional motion). Furthermore, the anatomy can change during the actually treatment delivery, commonly referred to as intrafractional motion. Having the target tissue move or change shape relative to the treatment plan can cause a deterioration of the actual delivered dose to the target organs and risks exposing surrounding sensitive structures to unwanted radiation.
Due to its excellent soft-tissue contrast, ultrasound imaging is a commonly-used method to obtain images of patient anatomy throughout an entire radiotherapy process. For example, three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS) images acquired in conjunction with a CT simulation may be used to enhance contouring of structures for planning by fused CT/3DUS images and to form an initial reference image of the internal anatomy for subsequent image guidance. Similarly, 3DUS images acquired in the treatment room, prior to each fraction, may be compared to reference 3DUS images to identify interfractional changes in internal anatomy. These 3DUS images acquired are generated by manually sweeping a 2DUS probe over a region of interest while detecting the position and orientation of the 2DUS probe. A freehand-3DUS image is then constructed relative to a room coordinate system is the imaging or therapy room. The position and orientation of the probe throughout the sweep are commonly found by detection of infrared markers affixed to the probe handle by a calibrated optical camera system.
Although freehand-3DUS imaging is useful for both planning and measuring interfractional motion, there are benefits to leaving the probe in place once the patient is set up in the treatment room, and acquiring either 2DUS or 3DUS images using a non-freehand 3DUS probe using, for example, a mechanically sweeping probe or matrix probe. Images can then be acquired at will, independent of the radiation therapist, without user variability. Multiple images can be acquired before, during, and after treatment to detect intrafractional motion, and changes in target location or shape can be compensated for during delivery of the current treatment fraction and/or in subsequent treatment fractions.
However, due to various constraints these techniques are not technically feasible. One constraint arises from the geometry of treatment and imaging apparatus; an ultrasound probe, for example, generally must maintain contact with the patient while the radiation is being delivered, but in most cases, the probe sits in the path of commonly used beam angles. This will affect the radiation dose distribution inside the patient, which in turn cannot be compensated for standard radiotherapy beams.
Moreover, radiation beams are typically directed at the patient from multiple intersecting directions, and the probe must not be in the path of the radiation beam, which would cause attenuation of the radiation, and potentially increase the skin dose to the patient. Furthermore, a user cannot remain in the radiation room to operate the ultrasound device while the beam is on due to radiation safety concerns. What is needed, therefore, are methods, systems and apparatus that facilitate the use of ultrasound imaging for planning, inter and intrafractional imaging of a patient undergoing radiotherapy treatment while not interfering with the radiation beam and permitting operation without a user in the treatment room, thus allowing for appropriate adjustments to be implemented during treatment delivery, for changes to patient positioning, or in some cases, to halt treatment altogether.
Embodiments of the invention permit simultaneous use of radiation therapy devices (e.g., a LINAC) and ultrasound imaging probes. To avoid the constraints described above, the radiation and imaging entry points are maintained in mutually exclusive spaces and, in some cases, travel along mutually exclusive paths to the target tissue. In this way, the ultrasound probe can acquire a temporally distinct set of two-dimensional and/or three-dimensional images while the radiation beam is active and administering radiotherapy, in addition to just prior to and after a fraction. This approach to detecting and compensating for intra- and interfractional motion before, during, and after radiotherapy fractions allows for the real-time adaptation of a radiation treatment plan without risking mechanical or electromagnetic interference between the radiotherapy device and the diagnostic imaging device, and avoids potential radiation damage to the ultrasound probe. As a result, it is possible to plan and/or correct for interfractional motion, and particularly intrafractional motion while the probe remains stationary, allowing technicians to remain outside the radiation delivery room.
More specifically, corrections may be implemented by detecting the location and movement of target tissue and surrounding sensitive structures at many points in time before, during and after treatment with little or no direct involvement by a human. As a result, physicians, technicians and radiobiologists can safely and quickly review the effectiveness of radiotherapy or other treatments to determine if treatment modifications are warranted, as well as to document and understand the relationship between dosages and in-vivo damage to diseased cells and surrounding healthy tissue. Deviations from the original plan can be compensated, for example, by moving the treatment couch, stopping the beam if the organ positions are out of tolerance, or modifying the beam delivery parameters such as beam apertures and angles in real time or at various discrete time points throughout the treatment. Compensations can be made during the fraction itself or can be carried out by modifying the treatment plan for subsequent fractions.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method of monitoring radiation treatment being delivered to a patient includes positioning the patient such that a radiation beam is delivered to a lesion within the patient along a beam-delivery path; securing a diagnostic imaging device about the patient such that the diagnostic imaging device does not intersect the beam-delivery path; and simultaneously administering radiation therapy along the beam-delivery path and obtaining diagnostic images using the imaging device.
The diagnostic imaging device may be a two-dimensional ultrasound imaging device, in which case the images reflect changes within the two-dimensional plane being acquired. In some cases, the diagnostic imaging device is a three-dimensional ultrasound imaging device, which can capture fully-formed three-dimensional images, or, in some cases, multiple two-dimensional slices from varying angles or positions. These slices may then be reconstructed into three-dimensional images. In either case, the ultrasound imaging device may include one or more tracking devices (typically reflectors or emitters attached to the handle or head of the device) which allow for real-time positional tracking of the device. By tracking the device over time, the multiple temporally-displaced, three-dimensional ultrasound images may be used to create a “four-dimensional” ultrasound image.
In some embodiments, the diagnostic imaging device can be secured into a brace, thereby ensuring that the diagnostic imaging device does not intersect the beam-delivery path, and/or the sonifications emitted by the diagnostic imaging device do not substantially interfere with the beam-delivery path. For example, the lesion may be a prostate tumor, in which case the diagnostic imaging device is positioned transperineally. In some implementations, a comparison of diagnostic images taken during the delivery of radiation therapy may indicate the need for an adjustment of certain radiation treatment parameters such as the beam angle, beam isocenter, couch position, beam apertures, beam delivery, focal point, energy level, or duration of the fraction. In certain cases, a baseline diagnostic image of the lesion (i.e., an image taken prior to the delivery of radiation therapy or during the treatment planning stage) is also used in the comparison process. The baseline images may be ultrasound images and/or CT images. Additional diagnostic images may also be obtained just prior to and/or immediately after delivery of radiation, but while the patient remains in the treatment position.
In another aspect of the invention, an apparatus for monitoring the delivery of radiation treatment being delivered to a patient includes an imaging device (e.g., a two or three-dimensional ultrasound imaging device) and a brace for holding the device. The brace includes a housing for accepting the imaging device and may be secured to a patient support platform (e.g., a table) such that the brace and the diagnostic imaging device remain outside of a radiation treatment beam as radiation treatment is delivered to the patient. As a result, the diagnostic imaging device obtains images during, but without interfering with, the delivery of radiation to the patient.
The ultrasound imaging device may also include one or more optical tracking devices which facilitate real-time positional tracking of the imaging device by a room-based laser tracking system, for example. As the diagnostic images are obtained and analyzed, adjustments to certain radiation treatment parameters (e.g., the beam angle, entry point, focal point, energy level, etc.) may be implemented. The position of the brace may be adjustable (either manually or automatically) in response to the changes in the parameters.
In another aspect, a system for monitoring the delivery of radiation therapy includes a diagnostic imaging device for obtaining diagnostic images as radiotherapy treatment is delivered to a patient, a register for storing the images, and a processor. The processor is configured to compare two or more of the diagnostic images and determine adjustments to radiation treatment parameters based on the comparison. The comparison may be done by automatically segmenting the target anatomy and other nearby critical structures in each image, or, in some instances, by comparing grayscale values to identify differences in a patient's anatomy over time.
The system may also include a brace that ensures the diagnostic imaging device does not interfere with a beam-delivery path of the radiotherapy treatment. A controller may be used to cause the brace to move according to the new radiation treatment parameters, such as if a new beam angle and/or entry point are to be used. A monitor may be used to display the radiation treatment parameters and, in some cases, the diagnostic images. A baseline diagnostic scan may also be used (and, in some cases, stored in the register) as input into the comparison process.
In another aspect, the invention provides software in computer-readable form for performing the methods described herein.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Throughout the following descriptions and examples, the invention is described in the context of monitoring changes to patient anatomy during treatment delivery, and/or monitoring and measuring the effects of radiotherapy as administered to a lesion or tumor. However, it is to be understood that the present invention may be applied to monitoring various physical and/or biological attributes of virtually any mass within or on a patient in response to and/or during any form of treatment. For example, the therapy can include one or more of radiation, cryotherapy, or any other treatment method.
Referring to
However, in order to ensure accuracy of the scan(s), proper administration of the radiation, and safety of the operators, the scanning device is positioned in a manner that does not interfere with the beam angle (including the beam entry point) while still providing clear, accurate and consistent images of the lesion. Further, in some implementations, tracking markers (e.g., reflectors, emitters or other devices) may be placed about the scanning device to locate and track the device with respect to one or more coordinate systems. For example,
By sensing signals transmitted from the emitters 210 located about the device 120, the tracking system may calculate (using standard triangulation methods) and record the location of the portable device 120 as its position moves with respect to the signal-receiving unit of the tracking system. This position data may be communicated to the operator of the portable device, thus allowing the operator to accurately locate the portable device at any position with respect to the receiver of the tracking system. Alternatively, position data may be provided to a controller that automatically adjusts the position of the device 120. The position data may be communicated through a visual display, audio signal, or combination of the two. The emitters 210 may be permanently attached to the device 120, and/or releasably attached to the portable device.
In one particular implementation, the tracking system is located at a fixed location within or surrounding a separate defined coordinate system. For example, the tracking system may include one or more receiving units placed on or mounted to the walls of a room, with a coordinate system defined by the walls of the room. As such, the tracking system can convert the detected position of the portable device from a location in the tracking system's coordinate system to a location in the room coordinates (or, in some cases, a treatment-device based coordinate system). This allows the device 120 to be accurately positioned and oriented with respect to any tracked location within the room and/or the patient.
The tracking system and/or the room may be defined by a Cartesian coordinate system, a cylindrical coordinate system, and/or a spherical coordinate system. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, the tracking system calculates the location of the portable device with respect to a receiving unit in spherical coordinates, and then converts this position into a location within a room defined by Cartesian coordinates. The (x, y, z) axes of the room-based Cartesian coordinate system may correspond, for example, to the floor and walls of the room, to a coordinate system whose center (i.e., the (0, 0, 0) location) is positioned either at a corner of the room or at some other point within the room. In one embodiment, the center of a treatment room-based Cartesian coordinate system is located at the isocenter of the linear accelerator, which is the point about which radiation beams from all directions intersect and is located at a known fixed position in the room. Thus, the tracking system can allow a user to position a portable device accurately with respect to the treatment isocenter, allowing for improved medical diagnosis and treatment using portable devices.
While the discussions above and following describe the use of an ultrasound imaging apparatus during the delivery of radiotherapy, similar techniques and systems may also be used in conjunction with other imaging modalities, such as in a CT scanning room. Such uses may include applications during a treatment simulation and/or treatment planning, wherein the ultrasound device does not interfere with potential virtual treatment beams which will be planned based on the CT images. As a result, a baseline, planning-stage image may be acquired for future use in the treatment room. Moreover, an ultrasound image may be captured immediately during CT scanning, either by synchronizing ultrasound acquisition with the CT, or in the alternative, using a radiation-sensing device that senses when the CT beam is on and triggers the capture of ultrasound images. In some embodiments, multiple ultrasound images can be acquired throughout the CT imaging session (as opposed to a radiotherapy treatment session) to quantify internal motion during the session. Alternatively, the acquisition of ultrasound images can be correlated with 4DCT images such that a temporal series of CT and ultrasound images correspond to each throughout the imaging session. In either case, the apparatus and techniques described herein allow for real-time or near-real time imaging in instances in which the operator cannot be in the treatment or CT imaging room to adjust or hold the ultrasound device.
In general, the methods, apparatuses, and systems described herein may be implemented at various stages of radiation treatment. For example, during the planning stage, 3DUS or 4D ultrasound may be fused with other imaging data (e.g., CT scan data) to provide enhanced radiation treatment planning images. More specifically, a non-ultrasound imaging device may be used to provide a first set of imaging data that is associated with a specific, fixed frame of reference. Typically, this would be either a coordinate system associated with the imaging device itself, or, in other cases, the room itself.
The ultrasound device is then used to capture a second set of imaging data. This second set may include a series of 2D image slices acquired at a different positions relative to the patient. The image different positions may be achieved using a single probe rotatably mounted within a probe casing such that the entire assembly can rotate about an axis, or, in some cases, the probe can sweep along one access within the casing to obtain images from different directions. In some instances the probe may be moveable relative to the patient, allowing a single 2D probe to be used to acquire multiple image slices. As described above, the probe may also be mounted on a moveable brace which maintains the probe position such that it does not interfere with the CT imaging process. The 2D image slices may then be used to construct a 3D image volume.
During the ultrasound imaging process, position data is captured for each 2D image slice as it is acquired. In implementations in which the ultrasound probe is encased in a housing, the position of the housing is determined, and registered with the position of the probe within the housing.
Using the housing position data, the mechanical position data of the 2D image slices within the housing, and the ultrasound imaging data, a 3D volumetric ultrasound image is constructed relative to a second fixed frame of reference, corresponding to a converted set of image data in the second fixed frame of reference. The converted image data is then combined with at least some of the first set of imaging data, using both the first and second fixed frames of reference to provide a composite set of imaging data to be used in developing a treatment plan. In some instances the two frames of references may be the same coordinate system, but in many implementations they are distinct.
Similar techniques may also be used to compare images acquired just prior to treatment delivery to images taken during the planning stage. In such implementations, reference structures are identified in the composite imaging data and a third set of images is captured. As with in the planning stage, an ultrasound device may be used to capture a series of 2D image slices, each being acquired at different mechanical positions. These images, taken using the same imaging modality and using the same imaging technique, can then be compared to each other to determine shifts and movement of the target anatomy that may have occurred between the planning process and just prior to treatment delivery. More specifically, the reference structures may be identified in the images taken just prior to treatment and compared to the corresponding structures in the planning stage images. Based on any changes, the treatment plan may be modified (e.g., adjust the couch position, change the beam angles, etc.) immediately prior to delivery of radiation treatment.
In yet another implementation, embodiments of the invention may be used during delivery of radiation therapy. In these cases, the third set of images described above are acquired at the same time that radiation is delivered to the patient. As described above, position data is determined for the casing corresponding to each 2D image slice as it is acquired, and using the position data, the mechanical position data of the probe within the casing, the location of the structures within the 2D data (or, in some cased, reconstructed 3D data) can be determined at discrete points in time throughout treatment. The locations of the structures in the third image set can be compared to the locations in the images taken during treatment planning, just prior to treatment delivery, and/or prior images taken during the treatment to determine to identify structure motion during treatment, modify the treatment plan in real-time, or in some cases, halt treatment altogether.
The techniques and system described herein may be used in conjunction with the planning and administration of radiation treatment therapy to any number of anatomical locations. Two specific applications are described in greater detail below.
In
For example, if, during a treatment session, the prostate shifts in position (due, for example to the filling of the bladder, breathing, flatulence, or other patient movement) the new location will be indicated on the diagnostic images. The beam shape, entry point, intensity level, focal point, beam isocenter, couch position, beam apertures, beam delivery or other parameter may then be adjusted accordingly. In other instances the target make change shape, such as the uterus changing shape as the bladder fills, which may also require new treatment parameters. In some embodiments, a baseline (e.g., pre-fraction) scan may be obtained and used in conjunction with the intrafractional images to determine the necessary parameter adjustments. Further adjustments may be based on comparisons with images taken just prior to and/or following treatment delivery.
In another example, the diagnostic imaging probe may be placed on one quadrant of a breast to obtain images of a lumpectomy cavity therein, while the radiation beam is directed to enter from an adjacent quadrant, thus not interfering with the probe. In some instances where multiple beam angles are necessary, the treatment may be stopped so that the probe can be moved to another quadrant, and the radiation beam can then be delivered from a new adjacent quadrant. These steps may be repeated as many times as necessary to deliver the prescribed radiation dosage.
In certain cases, the diagnostic probe may require a suitable mechanical structure (i.e., a brace) to hold it in place during use. This allows the user to be outside of the radiation treatment room while the radiation beam is in use, which is important for safety reasons. Referring to
In some embodiments, the brace may be used to secure the ultrasound probe during a treatment planning session to acquire images during the treatment planning session from approximately the same direction that the probe will be located when used during treatment delivery. These images may be used for planning purposes as an initial reference for future images acquired in the treatment room. Although no radiation is delivered during the planning session, it is beneficial to maintain the same imaging setup from planning to treatment, and to have the probe remain out of the beam path while secured in approximately the same position during treatment delivery. In other instances, the brace may be used during treatment sessions but not at the same time as radiation is delivered to the patient. This allows the probe to remain in a known, stable position outside the beam throughout an entire fraction without needing adjustment by a technician.
In some cases, the ultrasound images are fully formed “b-mode” images that include pixel values related to the anatomy and boundaries, which may be used to monitor geometric organ motion. In other cases, the ultrasound signal itself (sometimes referred to as “RF data”) may also be used to monitor characteristics of the organ being treated. For example, features of the RF data can be extracted from the signal to characterize tissue types (e.g., bone, fat, muscle, etc.) and/or determine tissue damage caused by radiation, in some cases even while the treatment is being delivered. More specifically, by calculating the power spectrum of the RF data reflected from a region of interest (or, in some cases, on a pixel by pixel basis), spectrum features such as the slope and intercept can be used as an indicator of tissue type and whether the region of interest contains cancerous cells. When comparing to an initial baseline from a previous image, changes in the RF data characteristics can provide an indication as to the effectiveness of treatment.
The technique is applicable not only to radiation therapy but to any other therapy which leads to tissue damage, e.g., the immediate or eventual killing of cells. Such therapies can include, for example, chemotherapy, cryotherapy, single-fraction radiosurgery, hyperthermia, or brachytherapy, or any combination of these treatment methods. Comparisons among scans taken during the delivery of tissue-damaging therapy provide a direct measurement of the effectiveness of the treatment in both time and space, allowing the physician to adapt the treatment based on the results.
Referring to
In various embodiments the register 605 and/or processor 610 may be provided as either software, hardware, or some combination thereof. For example, the system may be implemented on one or more server-class computers, such as a PC having a CPU board containing one or more processors such as the Pentium or Celeron family of processors manufactured by Intel Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif., the 680×0 and POWER PC family of processors manufactured by Motorola Corporation of Schaumburg, Ill., and/or the ATHLON line of processors manufactured by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., of Sunnyvale, Calif. The processor may also include a main memory unit for storing programs and/or data relating to the methods described above. The memory may include random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), and/or FLASH memory residing on commonly available hardware such as one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), field programmable gate arrays (FPGA), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROM), programmable read-only memories (PROM), programmable logic devices (PLD), or read-only memory devices (ROM). In some embodiments, the programs may be provided using external RAM and/or ROM such as optical disks, magnetic disks, as well as other commonly storage devices.
For embodiments in which the invention is provided as a software program, the program may be written in any one of a number of high level languages such as FORTRAN, PASCAL, JAVA, C, C++, C#, LISP, PERL, BASIC or any suitable programming language. Additionally, the software can be implemented in an assembly language and/or machine language directed to the microprocessor resident on a target device.
It will therefore be seen that the foregoing represents an improved method and supporting system for monitoring the biological effects of radiotherapy and natural anatomical changes over the course of a treatment regimen. The terms and expressions employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Moreover, although the above-listed text and drawings contain titles headings, it is to be understood that these title and headings do not, and are not intended to limit the present invention, but rather, they serve merely as titles and headings of convenience.
This application claims priority to provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/224,582, entitled “Adaptive Radiotherapy Treatment Using Ultrasound” filed on Jul. 10, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3082322 | Koerner et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3777124 | Pavkovich | Dec 1973 | A |
3987281 | Hodes | Oct 1976 | A |
3991310 | Morrison | Nov 1976 | A |
4118631 | Froggatt | Oct 1978 | A |
4618978 | Cosman | Oct 1986 | A |
4882741 | Brown | Nov 1989 | A |
4923459 | Nambu | May 1990 | A |
4943990 | Schar | Jul 1990 | A |
5039867 | Nishihara et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5080100 | Trotel | Jan 1992 | A |
5086401 | Glassman et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5099846 | Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5107839 | Houdek et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5117829 | Miller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5138647 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5207223 | Adler | May 1993 | A |
5222499 | Allen et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5233990 | Barnea | Aug 1993 | A |
5291889 | Kenet et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295483 | Nowacki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299288 | Glassman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301674 | Erikson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5379642 | Reckwerdt et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389101 | Heilbrun et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5391139 | Edmundson | Feb 1995 | A |
5397329 | Allen | Mar 1995 | A |
5408101 | Wong | Apr 1995 | A |
5411026 | Carol | May 1995 | A |
5438991 | Yu et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442675 | Swerdloff et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446548 | Gerig et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447154 | Cinquin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5483961 | Kelly et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5511549 | Legg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524627 | Passi | Jun 1996 | A |
5531227 | Schneider | Jul 1996 | A |
5531520 | Grimson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553618 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5591983 | Yao | Jan 1997 | A |
5603318 | Heilbrun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609485 | Bergman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645066 | Gandini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673300 | Reckwerdt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690108 | Chakeres | Nov 1997 | A |
5715166 | Besl et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734384 | Yanof et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740225 | Nabatame | Apr 1998 | A |
5754623 | Seki | May 1998 | A |
5757881 | Hughes | May 1998 | A |
5778043 | Cosman | Jul 1998 | A |
5810007 | Holupka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836954 | Heilbrun et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851183 | Bucholz | Dec 1998 | A |
5859891 | Hibbard | Jan 1999 | A |
5871445 | Bucholz | Feb 1999 | A |
5952577 | Passi | Sep 1999 | A |
5991703 | Kase | Nov 1999 | A |
6019724 | Gronningsaeter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038283 | Carol et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6094508 | Acharya et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106470 | Geiser et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112341 | Moreland | Sep 2000 | A |
6117081 | Jago et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118848 | Reiffel | Sep 2000 | A |
6119033 | Spigelman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122341 | Butler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129670 | Burdette et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138495 | Paltieli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144875 | Schweikard et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146390 | Heilbrun et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198957 | Green | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208883 | Holupka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254538 | Downey et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259943 | Cosman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269143 | Tachibana | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285805 | Gueziec | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292578 | Kalvin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307914 | Kunieda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314310 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325758 | Carol et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345114 | Mackie et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359959 | Butler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366798 | Green | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6385286 | Fitchard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385288 | Kanematsu | May 2002 | B1 |
6390982 | Bova et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405072 | Cosman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423009 | Downey et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438202 | Olivera et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459769 | Cosman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491702 | Heilbrun et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511430 | Sherar et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516046 | Frohlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535574 | Collins et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546073 | Lee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553152 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560311 | Shepard et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567684 | Chenevert et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6585651 | Nolte et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591127 | McKinnon | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600810 | Hughes | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6621889 | Mostafavi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628983 | Gagnon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631284 | Nutt et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636622 | Mackie et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641539 | Hirooka et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661870 | Kapatoes et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662036 | Cosman | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669635 | Kessman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683985 | Kase et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690965 | Riaziat et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714627 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725079 | Zuk et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728424 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731970 | Schlossbauer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750873 | Bernardini et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754374 | Miller et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785409 | Suri | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804548 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842502 | Jaffray et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6914959 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915008 | Barman et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6968224 | Kessman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980679 | Jeung et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7092109 | Satoh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095823 | Topolnjak et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7260426 | Schweikard et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7333644 | Jerebko et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343030 | Sawyer | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7430321 | Okada et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7438685 | Burdette et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7535411 | Falco | May 2009 | B2 |
7613501 | Scherch | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634304 | Falco et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7662097 | Falco et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672705 | Lachaine et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729744 | Falco et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7801349 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8042209 | D'Souza et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8232535 | Olivera et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20010035871 | Bieger et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049475 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020018588 | Kusch | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020065461 | Cosman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082494 | Balloni et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087101 | Barrick et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122530 | Erbel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156375 | Kessman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176541 | Schubert et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183610 | Foley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188194 | Cosman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018232 | Elliott et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028401 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030112922 | Burdette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135115 | Burdette et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144813 | Takemoto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153825 | Mooradian et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182072 | Satoh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030231790 | Bottema | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015075 | Kimchy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015176 | Cosman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034301 | Falco | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040092815 | Schweikard et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040146137 | Bruder et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176925 | Satoh et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184646 | Oosawa | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040252870 | Reeves et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260142 | Lovoi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020917 | Scherch | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050180544 | Sauer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182316 | Burdette et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050251029 | Khamene et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020195 | Falco et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074292 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093205 | Bryll et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120608 | Luo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060241443 | Whitmore et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060285641 | Scherch | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293583 | Saracen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015991 | Fu et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038058 | West et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055090 | Neustadter et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080021300 | Allison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039713 | Thomson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064953 | Falco et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080219405 | Falco et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080292194 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090003523 | Raanes et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090003528 | Ramraj et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090093716 | Deischinger et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090110145 | Lu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110069815 | Nord et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2416887 | Feb 2002 | CA |
2621741 | Mar 2007 | CA |
0647457 | Apr 1995 | EP |
951697 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1304960 | May 2003 | EP |
1426806 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1757228 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2451355 | May 2012 | EP |
2451355 | Oct 2018 | EP |
2778574T | Nov 1999 | FR |
2003-117010 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2006000220 | Jan 2006 | JP |
WO-19992074 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9906644 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9926534 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9927839 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-200105316 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-200209588 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-03039370 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-2003039370 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-03076003 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004033041 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2006051523 | May 2006 | WO |
WO-2007028237 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2011003202 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wu et al., “Effect of Ultrasound Probe on Dose Delivery During Real-time Ultrasound-Guided Tumor Tracking”, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, USA, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 2006, pp. 3799-3802. |
Hsu et al., “Feasibility of using ultrasound for real-time tracking during radiotherapy”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 2005, pp. 1500-1512. |
Griffiths et al., “Transperineal Ultrasound for Measurement of Prostate Volume: Validation Against Transrectal Ultrasound”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 178, Oct. 2007, pp. 1375-1380. |
Pito, A Registration Aid, International Conference on Recent Advanced in 3D Digital Imaging and Modelling, pp. 85-92 (1997). |
Pollack et al., Conventional vs. Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Results of Dosimetry and Acute Toxicity, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 34(3):555-564. |
Robb, Three-Dimensional Visualization in Medicine and Biology. Book Chapter in: Handbook of Medical Imaging: Processing and Analysis, ed. Isaac N. Bankman, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, Chapter 42, pp. 685-671 (2000). |
Robinson, Advances in Multi-Modal Data Analysis: The Analyze Software Environment, httlp:/www.ii.metu.edu.tr/˜med-ii/makaleler/analyze_<http://www.ii.metu.edu.tri/˜med-ii/makaleler/analyze>sw_enve.pdf, 5 pages. Downloaded on Aug. 10, 2004. |
Soffen E.M. et al. Conformal static field radiation therapy treatment of early prostate cancer versus non-conformal techniques: A reduction in acute morbidity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 24: 485-488 (1992). |
Thayananthan, A. et al., <http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/˜bdrs2/papers/thayanantan>cvpr03.pdf, pp. 1-8. Downloaded from the Internet on Aug. 10, 2004. |
Tome et al., Commissioning and Quality Assurance of an Optically Guided Three-dimensional Ultrasound Target Localization System for Radiotherapy, Med. Phys., 29(8):1781-1788 (2002). |
Zhang, Iterative Point Matching for Registration of Free-Form Curves and Surfaces, International Journal of Computer Vision, 13(2):119-152 (1994). |
http/www.ucsfedu/ipouliot/Course,/chapter5.htm. |
http://www.acmp.orgimeetings/hershey 2001/hiphlights/benedict pdf. |
http://www.ucsfedu/'Jpouliot/Course/Lesson22.htm. |
http://www.gemedicalsystems.corri/patient/see treat/positioning.html. |
http://www.emoryradiationoncology.org/high-technology.htm. |
http://www.ucsfedu/jpouliot/Course/conforrnal_radiation_therapy.htm. |
International Search Report for International application No. PCT/CA2007/001626 dated Jan. 3, 2008 (4 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/CA2007/001626 dated Dec. 21, 2007 (7 pages). |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2010 (5 pages). |
Besl et al., A Method for Registration of 3d Shapes, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14(2):239-256 (1992). |
Booth, Modelling, The impact of treatment uncertainties in radiotherapy, University of Adelaide, Mar. 2002), Section 2.4 (http://thesis.library.adelaide.edu.au/uploads/approved/adt-SUA20020816.175301/public/03 chapter2.pdf. |
Brujic et al., Analysis of Free-Form Surface Registration, International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 393-396 (1996). |
Cuisenaire, O., http)/www.tele.ucl.ac.be/PEOPLE/OC/these/node74.html. <http://www.tele.ucl.ac.be/PEOPLE/OC/these/node74.html,> Posted Oct. 5, 1999, Downloaded from the Internet on Aug. 10, 2004. |
Cuisenaire, O., <http://www.tele.ucl.ac.be/PEOPLE/OC/these/node75.html,> Posted Oct. 5, 1999, Downloaded from the Internet on Aug. 10, 2004. |
Cuisenaire, O., <http://www.tele.uci.ac.be/PEOPLE/OC/these/node12.html,> Posted Oct. 5, 1999, Downloaded from the Internet on Aug. 10, 2004. |
Dubois et al. Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability of MR Imaging- and CT-derived Prostate Volumes after Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy, Radiology. 207(3):785-9 (1998). |
Eggert et al., Simultaneous Registration of Multiple Range Views for Reverse Engineering, International Conference of Pattern Recognition, pp. 243-247 (1996). |
Hanks, et al. , Three Dimensional Conformal External Beam Treatment of Prostate Cancer http://prostate-help.org/download/pilgrim/10rad.pdf. |
Hanks, et al.,Clinical and Biochemical Evidence of Control of Prostate Cancer at 5 Years After External Beam Radiation, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, 456-459 (1995). |
Haralick et al., Pose Estimation From Corresponding Data Point, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(6):1426-1446 (1989). |
Hua et al., Development of a Semi-Automatic Alignment Tool for Accelerated Localization of the Prostate, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 55(3):811-823 (2003). |
Jiang et al., A New Approach to 3-d Registration of Multimodality Medical Images by Surface Matching, SPIE vol. 1808 Visualization in Biomedical Computing pp. 196-213 (1992). |
Krempien et al., Daily patient set-up control in radiation therapy by coded light projection, 3 pages. |
Michalski et al., Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) for Prostate Cancer, Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri (1996) http://www.phoenix5 org/Infolink/Michalski/#3. |
Paskalev et al., Daily Target Localization for Prostate Patients based on 3-D Image Correlation, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 49, pp. 931-939 (2004). |
Pennec et al,. A Framework for Uncertainty and Validation of 3-D Registration Methods Based on Points and Frames, International Journal of Computer Vision 25(3), 203-229 (1997). |
Aoki, Y. et al. An Integrated Radiotherapy Treatment System and its Clinical Application, Radiation Medicine, vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 131-141, 1987. |
Barratt, Dean C., “Accuracy of an Electromagnetic Three-Dimensional Ultrasound System for Carotid Artery Imaging” from Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 27, No. 10, 2001, pp. 1421-1425. |
Bijhold, J. et al. Fast evaluation of patient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal and simulator images, Phys. Med. Biol., 1999, vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1665-1679. |
Bijhold, J. Three-dimensional verification of patient placement during radiotherapy using portal images, Med. Phys. 20 (2), Pt. 1, Mar./Apr. 1993. pp. 347-356. |
Boctor, et al., A Rapid Calibration Method for Registration and 3D Tracking of Ultrasound Images Using Spatial Localizer, Proceedings of the SPIE (2003). |
Boyer, A. A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs), Med. Phys. 19 (1), Jan./Feb. 1992 pp. 1-. |
Brigger, et al., “B-Spline Snakes: A Flexible Tool for Parametric Contour Detection,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 9, No. 9, Sep. 2000, pp. 1484-1496. |
Brunie L. et al. Pre-and intra-irradiation multimodal image registration: principles and first experiments, Radiotherapy and Oncology 29 (1993) pp. 244-252. |
Christensen G. E., Inverse consistent registration with object boundary constraints, Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano, 2004, IEEE International Symposium on Arlington, VA, USA Apr. 15-18, 2004, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE (4 pages). |
Claim Chart for Claim 10 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,154. |
Cuadra, M.B. et al., Atlas-based Segmentation of pathological MR brain images using a model of lesion growth; Medical Imaging IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 1301-1314, Oct. 2004. |
Czarnota G.J. et al. Ultrasound imaging of apoptosis: high-resolution non-invasive monitoring of programmed cell death in vitro, in situ and in vivo, British Journal of Cancer (1999) 81(3), pp. 520-527. |
European Search Report for PCT/CA2007/001626 dated Nov. 5, 2010 (6 pages). |
http://www.varian.com/pinf/imr000c.html. |
http://www.ucsf/edu/jpouliot/Course/conformal_radiation_therapy.htm. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/CA2005/001106 dated Jan. 23, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2005/001428 dated Oct. 3, 2007 (1 page). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CA2010/002008 dated May 2, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2009/000750, dated Sep. 18, 2009 (8 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2010/002008 dated Mar. 14, 2011 (7 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2005/001106 dated Nov. 15, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2005/001428 dated Nov. 16, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2005/01105 dated Oct. 27, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2006/001289 dated Oct. 30, 2006 (3 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2006/001461 dated Nov. 30, 2006 (5 pages). |
International Search Report for PCT/CA2007/000898 dated Jul. 12, 2007 (3 pages). |
Le Verre, C. et al. Intensity-Based Registration of Portal Images for Patient Positioning in Radiotherapy. |
Leszczynski K W et al., “An Image Registration scheme applied to verification of radiation therapy” British Journal of Radiology British Inst. Radiol UK [Online] vol. 71, No. 844, Apr. 1998 (Apr. 1998), ISSN: 0007-1285, retrieved from the Internet: url:http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/reprint/71/844/413.pdf. [retrieved on Nov. 10, 2009]. |
Lizzi, Frederic, et al., “Ultrasonic Spectrum Analysis of Tissue Assays and Therapy Evaluation,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, Wiley and Sons, New York, vol. 8, No. 1, (Jan. 1, 1997), pp. 3-10. |
Maurer C R et al., Registration of 3-D Images Using Weighted Geometrical Features, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US vol. 15, No. 6, Dec. 1, 1996 (14 pages). |
Meertens, H. et al. A method for the measurement of field placement errors in digital portal images, Phys. Med. Biol., 1990, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 299-323. |
Mencarelli, et al., “A Dosimetric Method to derive optimal couch corrections in the presence of anatomical deformations for H & N cancer,” abstract, 2011, 2 pages. |
Nagel, et al., “Online dose-guided setup correction protocol for hypo fractionated lung radiotherapy,” abstract, 2009, 1 page. |
Reinstein, L. et al. Radiotherapy Portal Imaging Quality, Report of AAPM Task Group No. 28, American Association of Physicists in Medicine by the American Institute of Physics, New York, 1988. |
Search Report for European Patent Application No. 06790638.8, dated Apr. 23, 2010 (7 pages). |
Simpson, R.G. et al. A 4-MV CT scanner for radiation therapy: The prototype system. Med. Phys. 9(4), Jul./Aug. 1982, pp. 574-579. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Oct. 30, 2008 for European Patent Application No. 05788508.9/PCT/CA2005001428. |
Supplementary European Search Report for PCT/CA2005001106_RNM-003PC_dated Nov. 10, 2009, 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report, for PCT Application No. PCT/CA2005001135, dated Feb. 27, 2009 (12 pages). |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for EP Application No. 5763463, dated Nov. 30, 2009, 7 pages. |
Swindell, W. et al. Computed tomography with a linear accelerator with radiotheraphy applications, Med. Phys. 10(4), Jul./Aug. 1983, pp. 416-420. |
Troccaz, J. et al. Conformal external radiotherapy of prostatic carcinoma: requirements and experimental results, Radiotherapy and Oncology 29 (1993) pp. 176-183. |
Troccaz., J et al. Patient Setup Optimization for External Conformal Radiotherapy, Journal of Image Guided Surgery, 1, pp. 113-120 (1995). |
Van de Geijn, J. et al. A Graticule for Evaluation of Megavolt X Ray Port Films, Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Nov. 1982, vol. 8, No. 11 pp. 1999-2000. |
Written Opinion for PCT/CA2005/001106 dated Nov. 15, 2005. |
Written Opinion of the International Search report for PCT/CA2005/001105 dated Oct. 27, 2005. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2005/001428 dated Nov. 8, 2005 (6 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2006/001289 dated Oct. 30, 2006 (6 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2006/001461 dated Dec. 8, 2006 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/CA2007/000898 dated Jul. 23, 2007 (6 pages). |
Zitova, B. et al., Image Registration Methods: A survey, Image and Vision Computing, Elsevier, Guildford, GB, vol. 21, No. 11, Oct. 1, 2003 (24 pages). |
Preliminary Report for PCT/CA10/002008, dated Jul. 26, 2012, (5 pages). |
International Search Report, issued by the European Patent Office in corresponding Application No. EP 10796634.3, dated Sep. 3, 2013, 7 pp. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued by the European Patent Office in corresponding European Application No. 10 796 634.3, dated Jun. 13, 2017 (6 pages). |
“European Application Serial No. 10796634.3, Office Action dated May 8, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10796634.3, Response filed Mar. 31, 2014 to Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10796634.3, Response filed Nov. 1, 2017 to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jun. 13, 2017”, 12 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18200285.7, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 8200285.7, Response filed Aug. 20, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2010/001079, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 19, 2012”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2010/001079, International Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/CA2010/001079, Written Opinion dated Oct. 25, 2010”, 6 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110009742 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61224582 | Jul 2009 | US |