This disclosure generally relates to systems and methods that facilitate adaptively determining and improving the quality of a region of interest in video content.
Video conferencing allows people at two or more locations to interact simultaneously via video and audio transmissions. In the past, video conferencing was largely limited to enterprise use. However, the growth of the internet and wireless communication networks, coupled with declining bandwidth cost, has made video conferencing more accessible than ever before. A number of services exist that provide low bandwidth video conferencing to consumers using the internet or wireless communication networks. In addition, the rapid growth of mobile communication devices that include cameras, such as smart phones and tablet computers, enable consumers to video conference at virtually any time from anywhere in the world.
Typically, video conferencing is a bandwidth intensive process that requires transmission and reception of large amounts of video and audio information. Low bandwidth video conferencing mitigates bandwidth requirements in part by applying high compression to the video transmission. However, heavily compressing the video reduces the overall quality of the observed video. The reduction in quality is often readily apparent with respect to human faces. People can be rendered unrecognizable due to the high compression rates employed in low bandwidth video conferencing.
High bandwidth or high definition video conferencing can provide high quality observed video. However, these techniques can require special communication infrastructures that are not readily available or affordable. In addition, common techniques for facial detection and/or enhancement can be computationally expensive, and may not be well suited for video conferencing.
The following presents a simplified summary of the specification in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the specification. This summary is not an extensive overview of the specification. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the specification nor delineate any scope of particular embodiments of the specification, or any scope of the claims. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the specification in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
According to an aspect of the subject innovation, systems and methods for adaptively determining and improving the quality of a region of interest in video content are disclosed. Chroma values contained in respective regions of an image are determined. The chroma values are compared against a set of chroma values corresponding to human skin tones, and regions of the image having a chroma value corresponding to a human skin tone are included in a set of regions of interest. An encoder encodes the regions of interest included in the image at a higher or better quality than a remainder of the image.
In one embodiment, a region inspection component examines regions of a frame, and a detection component determines chroma values contained in the regions of the frame. A comparison component compares the chroma values against a set of predetermined chroma values, and determines, based on the comparison, a set of regions of interest in the frame.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth certain illustrative aspects of the specification. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the specification may be employed. Other advantages and novel features of the specification will become apparent from the following detailed description of the specification when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
Overview
The innovation is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of this innovation. It may be evident, however, that the innovation can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the innovation.
As noted in the Background section, conventional techniques for facial detection and/or enhancement can be computationally expensive and not well suited for video conferencing. One non-limiting implementation of the innovation provides efficient and accurate facial detection and/or enhancement for video conferencing. The implementation adaptively determines regions of an image corresponding to skin tones, and provides data regarding the regions to an encoder. The encoder encodes the regions at a higher or better quality than a remainder of the image.
More particularly, in accordance with an embodiment, a region inspection component examines regions of a frame, and a detection component determines chroma values contained in the regions of the frame. A comparison component compares the chroma values against a set of predetermined chroma values, and determines, based on the comparison, a set of regions of interest in the frame.
Non-Limiting Examples of Adaptive Determination of Regions of Interest in Images
Turning now to
The ROI component 102 includes a detection component 108 and a filter component 110. The detection component 108 inspects, examines, or otherwise analyzes regions (e.g., macroblocks, etc.) of a frame, and determines a set of regions included in the frame that satisfy a set of ROI criteria 114 (potential regions of interest or potential ROI). The set of ROI criteria 114 can include but are not limited to inclusion, presence, or occurrence of predetermined chroma values associated with an object to be detected. For example, in an implementation, the detection component 108 maps regions of the frame based on satisfaction of the set of ROI criteria 114.
The filter component 110 filters out regions included in the set of potential ROI based on a set of filtering criteria, and generates a set of ROI data 112 based on the filtered set of potential ROI. The set of filtering criteria can include but is not limited to having a variance satisfying a predetermined threshold. For example, in one implementation, the filter component 110 filters out regions included in the set of potential ROI that have a variance below the predetermined threshold. The ROI data 112 indicates ROI and/or regions of non-interest (RONI) included in the frame. For example, in an implementation, the filter component 110 generates an image map (e.g., ROI data 112 or using ROI data 112) indicating whether respective regions of the frame include ROI and/or RONI. It is to be appreciated that although the ROI criteria 114 are illustrated as being maintained in the data store 116 such implementation is not so limited. For example, the ROI criteria 114 can be maintained in the ROI component 102, or at a different location where the ROI component 102 may access the ROI criteria 114, for example, via a network connection.
The encoder 106 converts, alters, or otherwise encodes frames included in the video 104 based at least in part on ROI data 112 associated with at least one frame included in the video 104. For example, in an implementation, the encoder 106 encodes ROI in the frame at a higher, better, or otherwise superior quality than RONI in the frame. It is to be appreciated that although the encoder 106 is illustrated as being different from the ROI component 102, such implementation is not so limited. For example, the ROI component 102 can be included in, associated with, or execute on top of, the encoder 106.
The region inspection component 202 inspects, examines, or otherwise analyzes respective regions of the frame. For example, in an implementation, regions of the frame are divided into respective macroblocks, and the region inspection component 202 analyzes the respective macroblocks associated with the frame. The chroma detection component 204 identifies, detects, or otherwise determines chroma values of/included in the respective regions (e.g., macroblocks). The comparison component 206 identifies, detects, or otherwise determines regions having chroma values that satisfy the set of ROI criteria 114, and includes the determined regions in a set of potential ROI. For example, in an implementation, the set of ROI criteria 114 includes but is not limited to matching at least one chroma value included in a set of predetermined chroma values. For example, the comparison component 206 may determine regions having chroma values that match one or more chroma values in the set of predetermined chroma values, and include the regions having at least one matching chroma value in the set of potential ROI.
The filter component 110 filters out regions included in the set of potential ROI based on a set of filtering criteria, and generates ROI data 112 for the frame based on the filtered set of potential ROI. For example, in an implementation, the filter component 110 filters out regions having a variance below a predetermined threshold, and generates the ROI data 112 using the remaining regions in the filtered set of potential ROI. As discussed, the encoder 106 encodes frames in the video 104 based at least in part on ROI data 112 associated with at least one frame in the video.
Referring to
The detection component 108 in
As discussed, the filter component 110 filters out regions (e.g., macroblocks) in a set of potential ROI based on a set of filtering criteria, and generates ROI data 112 for the frame based on the filtered set of potential ROI. The filter component 110 in
The median filter component 308 applies a median filter to the set of potential ROI that filters out macroblocks having a quantity of correlating neighbor macroblocks that does not satisfy a predetermined median threshold. For example, in one implementation, the median filter component 308 filters out macroblocks having a quantity of correlating neighbor macroblocks that is less than a predetermined median threshold. The median filter component 308 maintains areas of a frame (e.g., macroblocks) with the most correlating neighbors, and can remove errors created by small areas having limited useable information. The filter component 110 includes macroblocks remaining in the filtered set of potential ROI in a set of regions of interest (ROI). For example, in an implementation, the filter component 110 generates a skin map (e.g., ROI data 112 or using ROI data 112) indicating whether respective macroblocks included in the frame are included in the set of ROI.
The update component 302 updates, revises, or otherwise replaces previously generated ROI data 112, with current ROI data 112 based on a set of update criteria. The update criteria can include but is not limited to a predetermined difference threshold. For example, in an implementation, the ROI data 112 is generated for the first frame 104A included in the video 104, and the ROI data 112 is provided to the encoder 106. The update component 302 compares the ROI data 112 generated for a second frame 104B to the ROI data 112 for the first frame 104A, and if the difference between the ROI data 112 for the first frame 104A and the second frame 104B does not satisfy the predetermined difference threshold, then the update component 302 does not provide the ROI data 112 for the second frame 104B to the encoder 106. Updating and/or signaling the ROI data 112 has a computational expense, and if the ROI are within a difference threshold (e.g., substantially the same in the first frame 104A and the second frame 104B), then the update component 302 does not provide the updated ROI data 112 to the encoder 106. The encoder 106 encodes frames in the video 104 based at least in part on a most recent ROI data 112. For example, if the update component 302 does not provide the ROI data 112 generated for the second frame 104B, then the encoder 106 encodes the second frame 104B based at least in part on a most recent ROI data 112, for example, the ROI data 112 generated for the first frame 104A.
As discussed, the detection component 108 determines potential ROI in the frame. The detection component 108 in
The filter component 110 filters the set of potential ROI generated by the chroma detection component 204, and generates a skin map based on the filtered set of potential ROI. The filter component 110 in
The motion component 402 analyzes motion vectors associated with macroblocks included in the frame. The motion component 402 includes a mapping component 404, and a scoring component 406. The mapping component 404 generates a motion map based on the analyzed motion vectors for respective macroblocks included in the frame. For example, in an implementation, when a macroblock is coded with a non-zero motion vector, the mapping component 404 increments, increases, or otherwise adds to a value corresponding to the macroblock in the motion map. The motion map aggregates motion information from multiple frames (e.g., 104A-104C) in the video 104, and indicates areas of the video 104 having high occurrences of motion.
The scoring component 406 scores macroblocks in the frame as a function of the skin map and the motion map, and generates a ROI map (or ROI data 112) using the scores. For example, in an implementation, the scoring component 406 scores macroblocks based on inclusion in the skin map and motion values associated with the macroblocks in the motion map. For instance, if a macroblock is included in the skin map and a motion value associated with the macroblock in the motion map exceeds a predetermined motion threshold, then the macroblock can be scored as a “1” (e.g., true, etc.) in the ROI map. Additionally, if the macroblock is not included in the skin map and/or a motion value associated with the macroblock in the motion map does not exceed the predetermined motion threshold, then the macroblock can be scored as a “0” (e.g., false, etc.) in the ROI map. As an additional or alternative example, in one implementation, the scoring component 406 adjusts, modifies, or otherwise weights the importance of inclusion in the skin map and/or motion values in the motion map based on a set of weighting factors. The weighting factors can include but are not limited to a confidence (e.g., likelihood, etc.) that the skin map is accurate, and/or a confidence (e.g., likelihood, etc.) that motion in the frame is associated with a face. For instance, during a video conference, a camera employed may move an amount exceeding a predetermined camera motion threshold, resulting in a low confidence that the motion in the frame(s) is associated with a face. The scoring component 406 can apply greater importance (e.g., weight) to a macroblock being included in the skin map than to motion values for the macroblock in the motion map when generating the ROI map.
The update component 302 updates, revises, or otherwise replaces a ROI map associated with a first frame, with a ROI map associated with a second frame based on a set of update criteria. The update criteria can include but is not limited to a predetermined difference threshold. For example, in an implementation, the ROI map is generated for the first frame 104A included in a video 104, and provided to the encoder 106. The update component 302 compares a ROI map generated for a second frame 104B to the ROI map, and if the difference between the ROI map generated for the first frame and the ROI map generated for the second frame 104B does not exceed the predetermined difference threshold, then the update component 302 does not communicate the ROI map generated for the second frame 104B to the encoder 106.
The encoder 106 encodes frames in the video 104 based at least in part on a most recent ROI map. For example, the most recent ROI map can be associated with frame 104A, and the encoder 106 can encode frame 104C based in part on the most recent ROI map. For instance, the encoder 106 can encode macroblocks scored as corresponding to a human face (e.g., “1”) in the ROI map at a higher, better, or otherwise superior quality to macroblocks scored as not corresponding (e.g., “0”) to a human face in the ROI map.
As discussed, in one implementation, the chroma detection component 204 can compare chroma values included in a macroblock against a skin tone map (e.g., 502), and determine whether the macroblock includes one or more chroma values matching at least one of the chroma values (e.g., 504) and/or whether the macroblock includes one or more chroma values within a region in the skin tone map (e.g., 506) corresponding to human skin tones. During video conferencing users typically focus a camera on a face, and macroblocks containing chroma values associated with skin tones are likely to include a user's face. The chroma detection component 204 can label macroblocks having chroma values matching at least one of the chroma values 504 and/or within the region 506 as potential regions of interest (ROI). It is to be appreciated that the skin tone map 502 is but one example of a skin tone map, and such implementation is not so limited. Additional or alternative skin tone maps can be generated based on different quantities or different types of training data.
Non-Limiting Examples of Methods for Adaptive Determination of Regions of Interest in Images
Referring now to
At reference numeral 604, regions of interest in the image are determined based on a set of regions of interest (ROI) criteria (e.g., using the detection component 108). For example, in an implementation, the set of ROI criteria can include matching one or more chroma values corresponding to an object to be detected. Regions of the image containing at least one matching chroma value are determined to be regions of interest (e.g., using the comparison component 206).
At reference numeral 606, data regarding the determined regions of interest in the image are provided to an encoder (e.g., using the ROI component 102). The data can include but is not limited to identifiers (e.g., macroblock identifiers), locations, and/or coordinates of determined regions of interest in the image. For example, in one embodiment, the encoder converts or encodes the image based at least in part on the data regarding the determined regions of interest (e.g., using the encoder 106). For example, the encoder can encode the determined regions of interest in the image at a higher or better quality than a remainder of the image.
At reference numeral 706, a set of potential regions of interest in the image is determined based on a set of regions of interest criteria (e.g., using the detection component 108). For example, in an implementation, the set of regions of interest criteria can include matching one or more chroma values corresponding to an object to be detected (e.g., a face). Regions of the image containing at least one matching chroma value are included in the set of potential regions of interest (e.g., using the comparison component 206).
At reference numeral 708, a subset of regions included in the set of potential regions of interest are filtered out based on a set of filtering criteria (e.g., using the filter component 110). For example, in an implementation, the set of filtering criteria includes but is not limited to having a variance satisfying a predetermined variance threshold and/or having a quantity of correlating neighbor regions satisfying a median threshold. For instance, regions having variance below a predetermined threshold can be filtered out (e.g., using the LV filter component 306), and/or regions having a quantity of correlating neighbor blocks below a predetermined threshold can be filtered out (e.g., using the median filter component 308).
At reference numeral 710, a set of regions of interest (ROI) data is generated based on the filtered set of potential regions of interest (e.g., using the filter component 110). The data can include but is not limited to identifiers (e.g., macroblock identifiers), locations, and/or coordinates of determined regions of interest in the image. At reference numeral 712, the set of ROI data is provided to an encoder (e.g., using the ROI component 102). For example, in one embodiment, the encoder converts or encodes the image based at least in part on the ROI data (e.g., using the encoder 106). For instance, the encoder can encode the determined regions of interest in the image at a higher or better quality than a remainder of the image.
At reference numeral 808, a set of macroblocks included in the set of potential ROI are filtered out based on a set of filtering criteria (e.g., using the filter component 110). For example, in an implementation, the set of filtering criteria includes but is not limited to having a variance satisfying a predetermined variance threshold and/or having a quantity of correlating neighbor regions satisfying a median threshold. For instance, macroblocks in the set of potential ROI having a variance below the predetermined variance threshold can be filtered out (e.g., using the LV filter component 306), and/or macroblocks in the set of potential ROI having a quantity of correlating neighbor blocks below the predetermined median threshold can be filtered out (e.g., using the median filter component 308). As discussed, filtering out small areas of the image having few correlating neighbor macroblocks can help reduce errors created by small areas of the image containing limited useful information. At reference numeral 810, a skin map is generated based on the filtered set of potential ROI (e.g., using the filter component 110). For example, in on implementation, macroblocks included (or remaining) in the filtered set of potential ROI are mapped to generate the skin map. The skin map indicates macroblocks included in the frame that are likely to contain data associated with a face (e.g., regions of interest).
At reference numeral 812, a motion map is updated based on motion vectors associated with macroblocks included in the image (e.g., using the mapping component 404). For example, in an implementation, when a macroblock is coded with a non-zero motion vector, a value corresponding to the macroblock in the motion map is increased (e.g., incremented, etc). The motion map aggregates motion information from multiple images in the set of images, and indicates areas included in the set of images having the greatest occurrences of motion. As discussed, during video conferencing users typically focus a camera on one or more faces, and the areas having the greatest occurrences of motion are likely associated with a portion of a user's face.
At reference numeral 814, a regions of interest (ROI) map is generated as a function of the skin map and motion map (e.g., using the scoring component 406). For example, in an implementation, macroblocks are scored based on inclusion in the skin map and motion values associated with the macroblocks in the motion map. For instance, if a macroblock is included in the skin map, and a motion value associated with the macroblock in the motion map exceeds a predetermined motion threshold, then the macroblock can be scored as a “1” (e.g., true, etc.) in the ROI map. Additionally or alternatively, if the macroblock is not included in the skin map, and/or a motion value associated with the macroblock in the motion map does not exceed the predetermined motion threshold, then the macroblock can be scored as a “0” (e.g., false, etc.) in the ROI map.
As an additional or alternative example, in one implementation, the importance of inclusion in the skin map and/or motion values in the motion map is weighted based on a set of weighting factors (e.g., using the scoring component 406). The weighting factors can include but are not limited to a confidence (e.g., likelihood, etc.) that the skin map is accurate, and/or a confidence (e.g., likelihood, etc.) that motion in the frame is associated with a face. For instance, during a video conference, a camera employed may move an amount exceeding a predetermined camera motion threshold, resulting in a low confidence that motion in the frame(s) is associated with a face. A greater importance (e.g., weight) can be applied to inclusion in the skin map than to motion values in the motion map when generating the ROI map.
Returning to reference numeral 902, if it is determined that the image is not the first image in the set of images (N at reference numeral 902), then a determination is made whether the ROI map satisfies a set of update criteria at reference numeral 906 (e.g., using the update component 302). The update criteria can include but is not limited to a difference threshold. For example, in an implementation, a ROI map is generated for a first image included in a video, and provided to the encoder. Another ROI map generated for a second image is compared to the ROI map for the first image, and if the difference between the ROI maps generated for the first image and the second image does not satisfy the difference threshold, then the ROI map for the second image is not provided to the encoder. Updating and/or signaling the ROI map can have a computational expense, and if the ROIs are substantially the same in the first image and the second image, then the latter ROI map is not provided to the encoder. If it is determined that the ROI map does not satisfy the update criteria (N at reference numeral 906), then the ROI map is not provided to the encoder (e.g., using the update component 302), and the methodology advances to reference numeral 908. If it is determined that the ROI map satisfies the update criteria (Y at reference numeral 906), then the latter ROI map is provided to the encoder (e.g., using the update component 302) at reference numeral 904, and the methodology advances to reference numeral 908.
At reference numeral 908, a determination is made whether the image is the last image in the set of images. If it is determined that the image is the last image in the set of images (Y at reference numeral 908), then the methodology terminates. If it is determined that the image is not the last image in the set of images (N at reference numeral 908), then another image is processed (e.g., starting at reference numeral 802).
Exemplary Networked and Distributed Environments
One of ordinary skill in the art can appreciate that the various embodiments described herein can be implemented in connection with any computer or other client or server device, which can be deployed as part of a computer network or in a distributed computing environment, and can be connected to any kind of data store where media may be found. In this regard, the various embodiments described herein can be implemented in any computer system or environment having any number of memory or storage units, and any number of applications and processes occurring across any number of storage units. This includes, but is not limited to, an environment with server computers and client computers deployed in a network environment or a distributed computing environment, having remote or local storage.
Distributed computing provides sharing of computer resources and services by communicative exchange among computing devices and systems. These resources and services include the exchange of information, cache storage and disk storage for objects, such as files. These resources and services also include the sharing of processing power across multiple processing units for load balancing, expansion of resources, specialization of processing, and the like. Distributed computing takes advantage of network connectivity, allowing clients to leverage their collective power to benefit the entire enterprise. In this regard, a variety of devices may have applications, objects or resources that may participate in the various embodiments of this disclosure.
Each computing object 1010, 1012, etc. and computing objects or devices 1020, 1022, 1024, 1026, 1028, etc. can communicate with one or more other computing objects 1010, 1012, etc. and computing objects or devices 1020, 1022, 1024, 1026, 1028, etc. by way of the communications network 1040, either directly or indirectly. Even though illustrated as a single element in
There are a variety of systems, components, and network configurations that support distributed computing environments. For example, computing systems can be connected together by wired or wireless systems, by local networks or widely distributed networks. Currently, many networks are coupled to the Internet, which provides an infrastructure for widely distributed computing and encompasses many different networks, though any network infrastructure can be used for exemplary communications made incident to the systems as described in various embodiments.
Thus, a host of network topologies and network infrastructures, such as client/server, peer-to-peer, or hybrid architectures, can be employed. The “client” is a member of a class or group that uses the services of another class or group to which it is not related. A client can be a process, e.g., roughly a set of instructions or tasks, that requests a service provided by another program or process. The client may be or use a process that utilizes the requested service without having to “know” any working details about the other program or the service itself.
In a client/server architecture, particularly a networked system, a client is usually a computer that accesses shared network resources provided by another computer, e.g., a server. In the illustration of
A server is typically a remote computer system accessible over a remote or local network, such as the Internet or wireless network infrastructures. The client process may be active in a first computer system, and the server process may be active in a second computer system, communicating with one another over a communications medium, thus providing distributed functionality and allowing multiple clients to take advantage of the information-gathering capabilities of the server.
In a network environment in which the communications network/bus 1040 is the Internet, for example, the computing objects 1010, 1012, etc. can be Web servers with which the client computing objects or devices 1020, 1022, 1024, 1026, 1028, etc. communicate via any of a number of known protocols, such as the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP). Objects 1010, 1012, etc. may also serve as client computing objects or devices 1020, 1022, 1024, 1026, 1028, etc., as may be characteristic of a distributed computing environment.
Exemplary Computing Device
As mentioned, advantageously, the techniques described herein can be applied to any device suitable for implementing various embodiments described herein. Handheld, portable and other computing devices and computing objects of all kinds are contemplated for use in connection with the various embodiments, e.g., anywhere that a device may wish to read or write transactions from or to a data store. Accordingly, the below general purpose remote computer described below in
Although not required, embodiments can partly be implemented via an operating system, for use by a developer of services for a device or object, and/or included within application software that operates to perform one or more functional aspects of the various embodiments described herein. Software may be described in the general context of computer executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by one or more computers, such as client workstations, servers or other devices. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that computer systems have a variety of configurations and protocols that can be used to communicate data, and thus, no particular configuration or protocol is to be considered limiting.
With reference to
Computer 1110 includes a variety of computer readable media and can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 1110. The system memory 1130 may include computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) and/or random access memory (RAM). By way of example, and not limitation, memory 1130 may also include an operating system, application programs, other program modules, and program data.
A user can enter commands and information into the computer 1110 through input devices 1140. A monitor or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 1122 via an interface, such as output interface 1150. In addition to a monitor, computers can also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers and a printer, which may be connected through output interface 1150. An encoder 1145 is also connected to the system bus 1122. The encoder 1145 enables compression and/or decompression of digital data, such as digital video. The encoder 1145 accepts video data in, and converts video data to, virtually any digital format, including but not limited to MPEG-1 and 2 (MPG), QUICKTIME™ (MOV), REALMEDIA™, WINDOWS MEDIA™ (WMV), H.264 (MP4), DIVX™ and Xvid (AVI), FLASH VIDEO™ (FLV), Matroska Multimedia Container (MKV), Theora (OGG), 3GP, Video Object (VOB), and/or WebM™.
The computer 1110 may operate in a networked or distributed environment using logical connections to one or more other remote computers, such as remote computer 1170. The remote computer 1170 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, or any other remote media consumption or transmission device, and may include any or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 1110. The logical connections depicted in
As mentioned above, while exemplary embodiments have been described in connection with various computing devices and network architectures, the underlying concepts may be applied to any network system and any computing device or system in which it is desirable to publish or consume media in a flexible way.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. For the avoidance of doubt, this matter disclosed herein is not limited by such examples. In addition, any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs, nor is it meant to preclude equivalent exemplary structures and techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has,” “contains,” and other similar words are used in either the detailed description or the claims, for the avoidance of doubt, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as an open transition word without precluding any additional or other elements. Furthermore, reference throughout this disclosure to “one implementation” or “an implementation” or “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the implementation or embodiment is included in at least one implementation or embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrase “in one implementation” or “in an implementation” or “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same implementation or embodiment.
Computing devices typically include a variety of media, which can include computer-readable storage media. Computer-readable storage media can be any available storage media that can be accessed by the computer, is typically of a non-transitory nature, and can include both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media can be implemented in connection with any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, program modules, structured data, or unstructured data. Computer-readable storage media can include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or other tangible and/or non-transitory media which can be used to store desired information. Computer-readable storage media can be accessed by one or more local or remote computing devices, e.g., via access requests, queries or other data retrieval protocols, for a variety of operations with respect to the information stored by the medium.
As mentioned, the various techniques described herein may be implemented in connection with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. As used herein, the terms “component,” “system” and the like are likewise intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. Further, a component can come in the form of specially designed hardware; generalized hardware made specialized by the execution of software thereon that enables the hardware to perform specific function (e.g., coding and/or decoding); software stored on a computer readable medium; or a combination thereof.
The aforementioned systems have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It can be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or specified sub-components, some of the specified components or sub-components, and/or additional components, and according to various permutations and combinations of the foregoing. Sub-components can also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components (hierarchical). Additionally, it is to be noted that one or more components may be combined into a single component providing aggregate functionality or divided into several separate sub-components, and that any one or more middle layers, such as a management layer, may be provided to communicatively couple to such sub-components in order to provide integrated functionality. Any components described herein may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein but generally known by those of skill in the art.
In view of the exemplary systems described above, methodologies that may be implemented in accordance with the described subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to the flowcharts of the various figures. While for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies are shown and described as a series of blocks, the claimed subject matter is not limited by the order of the blocks, as some blocks may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other blocks from what is depicted and described herein. Where non-sequential, or branched, flow is illustrated via flowchart, it can be appreciated that various other branches, flow paths, and orders of the blocks, may be implemented which achieve the same or a similar result. Moreover, not all illustrated blocks may be required to implement the methodologies described hereinafter.
In addition to the various embodiments described herein, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments can be used or modifications and additions can be made to the described embodiment(s) for performing the same or equivalent function of the corresponding embodiment(s) without deviating there from. Still further, multiple processing chips or multiple devices can share the performance of one or more functions described herein, and similarly, storage can be effected across a plurality of devices. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited to any single embodiment, but rather can be construed in breadth, spirit and scope in accordance with the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3825832 | Frei et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
4463372 | Bennett et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4710810 | Koga | Dec 1987 | A |
4719642 | Lucas | Jan 1988 | A |
4729127 | Chan et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4736446 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4816906 | Kummerfeldt et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4868764 | Richards | Sep 1989 | A |
4891748 | Mann | Jan 1990 | A |
5068724 | Krause et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5083214 | Knowles | Jan 1992 | A |
5091782 | Krause et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5136371 | Savatier et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5136376 | Yagasaki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5148269 | de Haan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164819 | Music | Nov 1992 | A |
5231484 | Gonzales et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5270812 | Richards | Dec 1993 | A |
5274442 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5313306 | Kuban et al. | May 1994 | A |
5337086 | Fujinami | Aug 1994 | A |
5341440 | Earl et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5374958 | Yanagihara | Dec 1994 | A |
5398068 | Liu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5432870 | Schwartz | Jul 1995 | A |
5461423 | Tsukagoshi | Oct 1995 | A |
5463701 | Kantner, Jr. et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5512952 | Iwamura | Apr 1996 | A |
5561475 | Jung | Oct 1996 | A |
5561477 | Polit | Oct 1996 | A |
5576767 | Lee et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589945 | Abecassis | Dec 1996 | A |
5596370 | Jung | Jan 1997 | A |
5659539 | Porter et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666461 | Igarashi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5686962 | Chung et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696869 | Abecassis | Dec 1997 | A |
5734744 | Wittenstein et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737020 | Hall et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748247 | Hu | May 1998 | A |
5767909 | Jung | Jun 1998 | A |
5768533 | Ran | Jun 1998 | A |
5774593 | Zick et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777680 | Kim | Jul 1998 | A |
5793647 | Hageniers et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818536 | Morris et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818969 | Astle | Oct 1998 | A |
5828370 | Moeller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886742 | Hibi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903264 | Moeller et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929940 | Jeannin | Jul 1999 | A |
5930379 | Rehg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963203 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991447 | Eifrig et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999641 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999655 | Kalker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005980 | Eifrig et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011872 | Qian et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014706 | Cannon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026183 | Talluri et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035060 | Chen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035067 | Ponticos | Mar 2000 | A |
6041145 | Hayashi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055330 | Eleftheriadis et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061397 | Ogura | May 2000 | A |
6075875 | Gu | Jun 2000 | A |
6084908 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108383 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112234 | Leiper | Aug 2000 | A |
6115501 | Chun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119154 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125144 | Matsumura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141381 | Sugiyama | Oct 2000 | A |
6167164 | Lee | Dec 2000 | A |
6178204 | Hazra | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181822 | Miller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185363 | Dimitrova et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188799 | Tan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212234 | Andoh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222174 | Tullis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240135 | Kim | May 2001 | B1 |
6249613 | Crinon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249614 | Kolesnik et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256423 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271890 | Tamir et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272179 | Kadono | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275614 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289049 | Kim et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292837 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327304 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337917 | Onural et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6359929 | Boon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370267 | Miller et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377709 | Guillotel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381277 | Chun et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400763 | Wee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414995 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6418166 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427028 | Donescu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6473463 | Agarwal | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6501860 | Charrier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522784 | Zlotnick | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526097 | Sethuraman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529638 | Westerman | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560366 | Wilkins | May 2003 | B1 |
6570924 | Lynch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6661842 | Abousleman | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661925 | Pianykh et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687303 | Ishihara | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697061 | Wee et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707952 | Tan et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711211 | Lainema | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735249 | Karczewicz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754266 | Bahl et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757426 | Link | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757434 | Miled et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765964 | Conklin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6826229 | Kawashima et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6909749 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934419 | Zlotnick | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6985526 | Bottreau et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985527 | Gunter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6987866 | Hu | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010032 | Kikuchi et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7027506 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027654 | Ameres et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7076113 | Le Dinh | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085319 | Prakash et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116831 | Mukerjee et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136534 | Thyagarajan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143352 | Divakaran et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170937 | Zhou | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7226150 | Yoshimura et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7227977 | Dotsenko | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236524 | Sun et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7263125 | Lainema | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7330509 | Lu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7499492 | Ameres et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7599435 | Marpe et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8116374 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155454 | Raveendran | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8233676 | Ngan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243797 | Lin et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8311355 | Brunner | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8503536 | Zuo et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8605945 | El-Maleh | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010022815 | Agarwal | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020012471 | Nayyar | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031272 | Bagni et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020034245 | Sethuraman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036705 | Lee et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020080871 | Fallon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020136448 | Bortolussi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020168114 | Valente | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172289 | Akiyoshi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030081850 | Karczewicz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095598 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123545 | Prakash et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161399 | Ali | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030202594 | Lainema | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040013308 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040120398 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120400 | Linzer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040131117 | Sheraizin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156549 | Persiantsev | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179820 | Kashiwagi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208392 | Raveendran et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228410 | Ameres et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240556 | Winger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252886 | Pan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013494 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046702 | Katayama et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111744 | Kupeev et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050147165 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152456 | Orchard et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169374 | Marpe et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050180506 | Wittebrood et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050206785 | Swan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232351 | Jung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265447 | Park | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276497 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060098737 | Sethuraman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114996 | Thoreau et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126739 | Stoner | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155398 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060204113 | Wang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215758 | Kawashima | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239345 | Taubman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257048 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070076947 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110290 | Chang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115156 | Lim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140342 | Karczewicz et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140346 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165958 | Picard | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171974 | Baik | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183661 | El-Maleh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183662 | Wang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183663 | Wang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070236513 | Hedenstroem et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080008398 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056347 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080151997 | Oguz | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152245 | El-Maleh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170793 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175475 | Sung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212678 | Booth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246884 | Chung | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090034619 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090097543 | Pan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103617 | Au et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090161767 | Jang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161938 | Shekhar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226044 | Ngan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262835 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278961 | Mohanty et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296814 | Lin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324121 | Bhagavathy et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100054344 | Puri et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061444 | Wilkins et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061461 | Bankoski et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100208812 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100246939 | Aisaka et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246951 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272173 | Puri et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278271 | Maclnnis | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303150 | Hsiung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328538 | Al-Kadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007977 | Amonou et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110182352 | Pace | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182509 | Free | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188579 | Lin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110243249 | Lee | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249756 | Doepke | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120020407 | Liu et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120128067 | Liu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155532 | Puri et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130148729 | Sasai et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1351510 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2350515 | Nov 2000 | GB |
2371434 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2217088 | Aug 1990 | JP |
8280032 | Oct 1996 | JP |
11262018 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11289544 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11313332 | Nov 1999 | JP |
11513205 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2007036888 | Feb 2007 | JP |
100213018 | Aug 1999 | KR |
200130916 | Apr 2001 | KR |
20060035542 | Apr 2006 | KR |
WO0150770 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0207164 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO03026315 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03041405 | May 2003 | WO |
WO2006078115 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2008002491 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bankoski et al. “Technical Overview of VP8, an Open Source Video Codec for the Web”. Dated Jul. 11, 2011. |
Bankoski et al. “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide” Independent Submission. RFC 6389, Dated Nov. 2011. |
Bankoski et al. “VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide; draft-bankoski-vp8-bitstream-02” Network Working Group. Internet-Draft, May 18, 2011, 288 pp. |
Carreira, Joao et al. “Constrained Parametric Min-Cuts for Automatic Object Segmentation”, 2010 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, CA, Jun. 13-18, 2010. |
Chen et al. (Predictive Video Decoding Based on Ordinal Depth of Moing Regions, IEEE Proceedings of ICC 2010). |
Flexible Macroblock Ordering; Wikipedia; Jul. 15, 2008. |
Implementors' Guide; Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Coding of moving video: Implementors Guide for H.264: Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Jul. 30, 2010. |
Lee et al, Bit Allocation for MPEG-4 Video Coding with Spatio-Temporal Tradeoffs, Jun. 2003, pp. 488-502, [retrieved from Internet on Jun. 19, 2011] <URL:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1207406>. |
M. Bierling, Displacement estimation by hierarchical blockmatching. 1998, in Proceedings of SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing 88, p. 942-951. |
Marcos Nieto, Luis Salgado, Narciso Garcia; Fast Mode Decision Based on Activity Segmentation in H.264/AVC Encoding; Grupo de Tratamiento de Imagenes—E.T.S. Ingenieros de Telecomunicacion, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain; Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006. |
Moschetti et al, Automatic Object Extraction and Dynamic Bitrate Allocation for Second Generation Video Coding, Multimedia and Expo, 2002. ICME '02 Proceedings. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Lausanne, Switzerland, Aug. 26, 2002, pp. 493-496, vol. 1,Piscataway, New Jersey, USA. |
Nunes P. et al, Rate Control for Scenes with Multiple Arbitrarily Shaped Video Objects, ITG Fachberichte, Jan. 1, 1997, pp. 303-308, Berlin, Germany. |
ON2 Technologies Inc., White Paper TrueMotion VP7 Video Codec, Jan. 10, 2005, 13 pages, Document Version: 1.0, Clifton Park, New York. |
Overview; VP7 Data Format and Decoder. Version 1.5. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Mar. 28, 2005. |
Paul et al. (“Video coding focusing on block partitioning and occlusion,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 19, No. 3, Mar. 2010, 691-701)-discloses pattern-based coding that divides a frame using different block shapes and sizes. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 11. Dated Mar. 2009. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. International Telecommunication Union. Version 12. Dated Mar. 2010. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Amendment 2: New profiles for professional applications. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Apr. 2007. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video. H.264. Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. Version 8. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Nov. 1, 2007. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Amendment 1: Support of additional colour spaces and removal of the High 4:4:4 Profile. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Jun. 2006. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Version 1. International Telecommunication Union. Dated May 2003. |
Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. H.264. Version 3. International Telecommunication Union. Dated Mar. 2005. |
Sikora, T. et al., Shape-adaptive DCT for generic coding of video, Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on vol. 5, Issue 1, p. 59-62, Feb 1, 1995. |
Sun Y et al, Asynchronous Rate Control for Multi-Object Videos, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Aug. 1, 2005, pp. 1007-1018, vol. 15, No. 8 [retrieved from Internet on Jul. 19, 2011] <URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1490554>. |
VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification. Version 1.02. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Aug. 17, 2006. |
VP6 Bitstream & Decoder Specification. Version 1.03. On2 Technologies, Inc. Dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide. WebM Project. Google On2. Dated: Dec. 1, 2010. |
Wiegand et al, “Overview of the H 264/AVC Video Coding Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 568, 569, Jul. 1, 2003. |
Wiegand, Thomas, Study of Final Committee Draft of Joint Video Specification (ITU-T Rec. H.264 | ISO/IEC 14496-10 AVC), Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q.6), JVT-F100, Dec. 5, 2002. |
Giovani Gomez, et al., Automatic Feature Constructions and a Simple Rule Induction Algorithm for Skin Detection, ITESM Capus Cuernavaca, Paseo de la Reforma 182—A, Temixo, Morelos 62589, Mexico, 8 pages. |
Tarek M. Mahmoud, A New Fast Skin Color Detection Technique, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 43 2008, 5 pages. |
Jure Kovac, et al., Human Skin Colour Clustering for Face Detection, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 5 pages. |
Vladimir Vezhnevets, et al., A Survey on Pixel-Based Skin Color Detection Techniques, Graphics and Media Laboratory, Moscow Russia, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US13/24782, dated Apr. 16, 2013, 19 pages. |
ISO/IEC: “information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects” Retrieved from the Internet: Http://kazus.ru/nuke/modules/downloads/pub/144/0/ISO-IEC-14496-2-2001. |
Pascal Fleury et al: “MPEG-4 video verification model: A solution for interactive multimedia applications” Journal of Electronic Imaging, SPIE/IS&T; Engineering Information Inc.; vol. 7, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 502-515. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130208784 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |