1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to systems and methods for improving a power and bandwidth constrained transmission system, and in particular to a system and method for adaptively varying an uplink signal from a terrestrially-based user terminal to a satellite according to a predicted degradation of the uplink signal.
2. Description of the Related Art
A typical communications system, whether terrestrial or satellite-based, is constrained in its transmission power and signal bandwidth. The communications system may also be required to deliver reliable communications to one point, as in a terrestrial microwave link, or to many points in a satellite broadcast system serving the United States.
A typical satellite communications system is typically designed such that all signals transmitted to and received from terrestrially based receivers have a minimum carrier to noise ratio (CNR). The CNR of the received signal is a function of a number of parameters, including the power of the signal transmitted and signal propagation characteristics such as atmospheric attenuation. Unfortunately, at the wavelengths typically used in satellite-home communications systems, rain and other sources of atmospheric attenuation have a significant effect upon the CNR. Hence, during heavy rain, subscribers can experience degraded signal quality in both transmitted and received signals.
In the past, system designers have assured a minimum signal quality is provided by designing transmitters, power systems, and related components to produce sufficient power to assure a minimum CNR in all conditions, even when compromised by unfavorable atmospheric attenuation characteristics. Unfortunately, the amount of attenuation from rain and similar atmospheric parameters can be substantial and widely varying. Hence, to achieve the desired CNR at all times (including intense rain periods) this solution requires that the ground and satellite transmitters, power system and related components be designed for high performance levels that are not needed most of the time.
Setting the transmitter power to a level that results in a sufficient CNR for all conditions (or nearly all conditions) may be economically impractical, and is typically infeasible in existing field units. What is needed is a system and method for adaptively controlling transmissions to account for signal propagation characteristics. The present invention satisfies that need.
To address the requirements described above, the present invention discloses a method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for adaptively transmitting an uplink signal comprising information from a ground station to a satellite. The method comprises the steps of receiving a transmitted downlink signal at a ground station from the satellite; measuring the quality of the transmitted signal; computing a prediction of a degradation of the uplink signal using the quality of the received signal, and transmitting the uplink signal according to the predicted degradation of the uplink signal.
The apparatus comprises a tuner for receiving a transmitted downlink signal from the satellite; a signal analyzer, communicatively coupled to the tuner, for measuring a characteristic of the received downlink signal; an uplink degradation estimation module, communicatively coupled to the signal analyzer, for estimating the degradation of the uplink signal from the received downlink signal characteristic; and a controller, communicatively coupled to the uplink degradation module, for controlling the transmission of the uplink signal according to the estimated degradation of the uplink signal.
The invention allows a predetermined successful communications link to a satellite using the subscriber's ODU. This is accomplished using an existing or modified power meter in the IRD to measure the downlink attenuation (typically due to weather), and to use the downlink attenuation to compute the expected uplink (from the subscriber to the satellite) degradation. If the degradation of the uplink signal is minimal, but enough to preclude normal transmission at acceptable error rates, the IRD transmits the data with a different transmission characteristic (e.g. lower transmission rate, different modulation scheme, higher power, or different error correction) to ensure successful transmission. If the degradation is sufficient to essentially preclude transmission, and the uplink cannot be established in the near future, the IRD stores the information, informs the subscriber that the uplink information will not be transmitted, continues to predict the uplink degradation from subsequent downlinks (e.g. every 5 minutes), and informs the subscriber when the uplink can commence. If the predicted degradation is between these two extremes, the IRD stores the information, informs the subscriber that the uplink will be delayed, and continues to predict the uplink degradation from subsequent downlinks. When the predicted degradation improves sufficiently to allow transmission, the information is uplinked to the satellite.
This allows the IRD to pre-determine the success of a message transmitted from the subscriber to the satellite. The signal degradations measured by the IRD can include degradations caused by weather, misalignment of the ODU, or reduced ODU or IRD performance from hardware or software malfunctions.
The present invention applies to a variety of terrestrial and satellite applications, but is especially advantageous in satellite distribution systems.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which is shown, by way of illustration, several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The uplink center 104 receives program material from external sources or the control center 102 via a communications link 114. In accordance with instructions from the control center 102, the uplink center 104 transmits the program material and program control information to the satellite 108 via uplink 116 using the uplink antenna 106. The satellite 108 receives and transmits the video programs and control information to the subscriber via downlink transmission signal 118. The subscriber 110 receives this information using the terrestrial receiver 112. The ground station 111 also comprises device having a transmitter and a transmit antenna for sending data to the satellite 108. The satellite 108 communicates information received from the ground station to the uplink center 104 via downlink 120. Typically, the signal transmitted by the transmitter to the satellite has characteristics that are pre-determined (e.g. modulation technique, power).
The video distribution system 100 can comprise a plurality of satellites 108 in order to provide wider terrestrial coverage, to provide additional channels, or to provide additional bandwidth per channel. In one embodiment of the invention, each satellite comprises 16 Ku band transponders to receive and transmit program material and other control data from the uplink center 104 and provide it to the subscribers 110. However, by using data compression and multiplexing techniques the television channel capabilities are far greater. For example, two satellites 108 working together can receive and broadcast over 200 conventional (non-HDTV) television channels via 32 satellite transponders.
While the invention disclosed herein is described with reference to a satellite based digital video distribution system 100, the present invention may also be practiced with terrestrial-based transmission of program information, whether by broadcast, unicast, cable, the Internet, or other means. Further, the different functions collectively allocated among the control center 102 and the uplink center 104 as described above can be reallocated between these facilities as desired without departing from the intended scope of the present invention.
Although the foregoing has been described with respect to an embodiment in which the program material delivered to the subscriber is video (and audio) program material such as a movie, the foregoing method can be used to deliver program material comprising purely audio or purely data, or any combination of information as well.
The video channels are provided by a program source of video material 200A-200C (collectively referred to hereinafter as video source(s) 200). The data from each video program source 200 is provided to an encoder 202A-202C (collectively referred to hereinafter as encoder(s) 202). Each of the encoders accepts a program time stamp (PTS) from the controller 216. The PTS is a wrap-around binary time stamp that is used to assure that the video information is properly synchronized with the audio information after encoding and decoding. A PTS time stamp is sent with each I-frame of the MPEG encoded data.
In one embodiment of the present invention, each encoder 202 is a second generation Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG-2) encoder, but other decoders implementing other coding techniques can be used as well. The data channel can be subjected to a similar compression scheme by an encoder (not shown), but such compression is usually either unnecessary, or performed by computer programs in the computer data source (for example, photographic data is typically compressed into *.TIF files or *.JPG files before transmission). After encoding by the encoders 202, the signals are converted into data packets by a packetizer 204A-204F (collectively referred to hereinafter as packetizer(s) 204) associated with each source 200.
The data packets are assembled using a reference from the system clock 214 (SCR), a control word (CW) generated by the conditional access manager 208, and a system channel identifier (SCID) 210 that associates each of the data packets that are broadcast to the subscriber with a program channel. This information is transmitted to the packetizers 204 for use in generating the data packets. These data packets are then multiplexed into serial data, encoded, modulated, and transmitted. A special packet known as a control word packet (CWP) (which comprises control data including the control word (CW) and other control data used in support of providing conditional access to the program material) is also encrypted and transmitted.
Subscribers 110 receive media programs via a subscriber receiver or integrated receiver/decoder (IRD) 400. Using the SCID, the IRD 400 reassembles the packets to regenerate the program material for each of the channels. As shown in
The IRD 400 comprises a receiver/decoder 402, a conditional access verifier (CAV) 408, and a conditional access module (CAM) 406. The CAV 408 and CAM 406 are typically implemented in a smart card or similar device, which is provided to the subscriber 110 to be inserted into the receiver/decoder 402.
The receiver decoder 402 comprises a tuner 410, a transport and demultiplexing module (TDM) 412, which operates under control of a microcontroller and associated memory 414, a source decoder 416 and communicatively coupled random access memory (RAM) 418, and a user I/O device 420 for accepting subscriber 110 commands and for providing output information to the subscriber 110.
The tuner 410 receives the data packets from the video distribution system via the outdoor unit (ODU) 422, which includes a transmit and receive antenna, and provides the packets to the TDM 412. Using the service channel identifiers (SCIDs) associated with each media program, the TDM 412 reassembles the data packets according to the channel selected by the subscriber 110, and unencrypts the media programs using the CW key. The TDM 412 can be implemented by a single secure chip, and is communicatively coupled to a microcontroller and memory 414.
Once the media programs are unencrypted, they are provided to the source decoder 416, which decodes the media program data according to MPEG or JPEG standards as appropriate. The decoded media program is then provided to a D/A converter (if necessary) and provided to external interfaces 404 which can include a media program presentation device such as a television, an audio system, or a computer. The source decoder 416 makes use of communicatively coupled RAM 418 to perform these functions. Further details regarding the operation of the IRD 400 can be found in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/491,959.
In some circumstances, it is beneficial to permit data to be transmitted from the subscriber 110 ground station 111 to the satellite 108. This capability is useful, for example, to provide Internet access to the subscriber 110 (via a protocol such as TCP/IP) or to transmit other data and information to the control center 102 (e.g. related to the delivery of video/audio programs to the subscriber) or to other entities.
A prediction of the degradation of the uplink signal is then computed by an uplink degradation prediction module or degradation computer 430, as shown in block 506. The prediction is computed using the measured quality of the received signal. For example, if the power level of the received signal is used as the metric to determine the quality of the received signal, the power level is used to predict or estimate the quality of the uplink signal. In one embodiment of the present invention, the downlink signal 118 may itself include parameters which describe the signal in such terms so as to provide additional data to estimate the degradation of the signal when transmitted from the satellite 108 to the ODU 422 and IRD 402. Such parameters can include, for example, the transmitted power of the downlink signal 118. The uplink signal is then transmitted according to the predicted degradation of the uplink signal 430, as shown in block 508.
The first and second transmission characteristics can be selected from a number of characteristics that can be used to describe the transmitted uplink signal 430. In one embodiment, the power of the transmitted uplink signal 430 is varied according to the predicted degradation value. In this embodiment, the first transmission characteristic is a first uplink transmission power, and the second transmission characteristic is a second uplink transmission power.
In another embodiment, the rate of the information transmitted in the uplink signal 430 is varied according to the predicted degradation value. For example, the uplink signal 430 can be modulated according to different modulation schemes, each with different data rates. For example, a phase shift keyed (PSK) modulation scheme may be utilized in the uplink signal 430. PSK modulation schemes include signal constellations with a plurality of signal points arranged in a wide variety of constellations, including QPSK, 8-PSK, and 16-PSK. When such modulation schemes are used, the first modulation scheme can be, for example, a lower data rate modulation scheme such as QPSK, and the higher data rate modulation scheme can include 8 or 16-PSK.
In another embodiment, the error correcting scheme used to code the information can be varied according to the predicted degradation value. Error correcting codes can be characterized by the level of redundancy they introduce into the data stream. Typically, error correcting codes with greater redundancy (and hence permit less data throughput) are also more resistant to errors.
In one embodiment, a comparison is made to determine whether the updated prediction of the degradation is less than the first value (thus permitting data transmission at a non-reduced transmission rate). This is illustrated in block 810. If so, the uplink signal 430 is transmitted with the normal transmission characteristic (e.g. data rate or modulation scheme) as shown in block 812. In another embodiment, the comparison determines whether the updated prediction of the degradation is less than the second value (thus permitting data transmission, albeit at a reduced transmission rate). If so, block 812 transmits the uplink information with the second transmission characteristic.
The transmission characteristic of the uplink signal can be selected as a combination of a wide number of different characteristics (e.g. selecting the uplink transmission characteristic based on error correction, data rate, and modulation) or can be selected from a continuous spectrum of choices (e.g. continuously varying uplink transmitter power according to the predicted degradation).
This concludes the description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3896382 | Magenheim | Jul 1975 | A |
4004224 | Arens et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4207431 | McVoy | Jun 1980 | A |
4301533 | Acampora et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4309764 | Acampora | Jan 1982 | A |
4567485 | Oshima et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4776035 | Duggan | Oct 1988 | A |
4837580 | Frazita | Jun 1989 | A |
4837786 | Gurantz et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4888596 | Conanan | Dec 1989 | A |
4896369 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4910792 | Takahata et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4941199 | Saam | Jul 1990 | A |
5060292 | Ayukawa et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5081713 | Miyazaki | Jan 1992 | A |
5204970 | Stengel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5257029 | Miyo | Oct 1993 | A |
5521943 | Dambacher | May 1996 | A |
5579367 | Raymond et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5666648 | Stuart | Sep 1997 | A |
5691980 | Welles et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5758260 | Wiedeman | May 1998 | A |
5793813 | Cleave | Aug 1998 | A |
5798731 | Lesthievent | Aug 1998 | A |
5801754 | Ruybal et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812947 | Dent | Sep 1998 | A |
5867109 | Wiedeman | Feb 1999 | A |
5878329 | Mallinckrodt | Mar 1999 | A |
5898680 | Johnstone et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5918156 | Tanabe | Jun 1999 | A |
5949766 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956619 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959984 | Dent | Sep 1999 | A |
5999127 | Dezelan | Dec 1999 | A |
6002422 | Mastenbrook | Dec 1999 | A |
6044323 | Yee et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6085067 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118999 | Moraes et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125261 | Anselmo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141534 | Snell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151308 | Ibanez-Meier et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173178 | Hammill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181932 | Kolev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212360 | Fleming et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219528 | Wright et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233451 | Noerpel et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272340 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297845 | Kuhn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317420 | Schiff | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324381 | Anselmo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335920 | Strodtbeck et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339611 | Antonio et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366776 | Wright et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385773 | Schwartzman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421528 | Rosen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430394 | Boyden | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466569 | Wright et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473858 | Shimomura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493538 | Jabbarnezhad | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512749 | Wright et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519446 | Tawil et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526575 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532220 | Carneal et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6580452 | Gangitano | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587687 | Wiedeman | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594469 | Serri et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628919 | Curello et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647270 | Himmelstein | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6704543 | Sharon et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724737 | Boyden et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6745043 | Lester et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757264 | Gayrard | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763006 | Lockett | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813476 | Brooker | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6813485 | Sorrells et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834180 | Marshall | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836650 | Sorrells et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6842437 | Heath | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6859652 | Karabinis et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6920185 | Hinson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925113 | Kim et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6975582 | Karabinis et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990314 | Hagen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7043200 | Andenæs | May 2006 | B2 |
7047029 | Godwin et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7408892 | Dale et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020041328 | LeCompte et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020061073 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066102 | Chapman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020146979 | Regulinski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168974 | Rosen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005437 | Feuer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016634 | Freedman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073435 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030203733 | Sharon | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050020204 | Ducasse | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050037706 | Settle | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050141445 | Dunas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080088462 | Breed | Apr 2008 | A1 |