Exemplary embodiments of the present invention relate to a method to operate a production plant having a plurality of work regions.
Production plants known from prior art are usually constructed to be rigid and inflexible. In particular, the conveyor technology used is installed in a fixed manner and therefore does not allow an adaptation of the production plant depending on load.
German patent document DE 10 2004 029 665 discloses a modular transfer system for work pieces that makes it possible to completely dispense with separate conveyor systems. The transfer system comprises a plurality of CNC machines arranged to be directly adjacent to one another and the servo motor drive of which is designed to transfer work pieces between the individual machines.
Furthermore, German patent document DE 10 2007 047 279 A1 discloses a production plant comprising a transport system that is fixedly installed and connects several processing stations to one another. Different work tasks can be carried out at the processing stations depending on load, in order to increase the flexibility of the production line.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method that provides a particularly flexible adaptation of the production plant to different production requirements.
Such a method serves to operate a production plant having a plurality of work regions in which respective work stations are arranged to carry out at least on respective work step. Furthermore, such a production plant comprises at least one transport system, by means of which goods to be processed are transported on at least one predetermined path between the work stations. For this purpose, the arrangement of the workstations, the work step that is able to be carried out by the respective work station as well as the at least one predetermined path is selected according to a predetermined criterion that relates to a production requirement and is adapted in the case of a change of the at least one criterion.
As opposed to the method known from prior art to operate production plants, a flexible adaptation of the operation of the production plant to respective current production requirements is enabled by the method according to the invention. The arrangement and the number of work stations, the work steps to be carried out and the connection of the work stations to one another by means of a transport system can be adapted on a daily basis in reaction to changing production requirements. In order to enable this, the components of the production plant are preferably all designed to be moveable, such that new arrangements and transport paths can be created in the shortest amount of time. For this purpose, it is expedient to use lightweight robots that can be re-configured quickly. Unmanned industrial trucks are particularly suitable as a transport system, the industrial trucks, for example, navigating autonomously or following an externally predetermined track that, for example, is laid on the floor. This enables a particularly quick adaptation of the transport path within the production plant, for example by simply giving new commands. Overall, such a particularly flexible method to operate the production plan is created, which enables the plant to adapt very quickly to changing requirements for the number of pieces or variant requirements without having to carry out large re-construction.
Preferably, work stations are used within the scope of the method that are formed as substantially identical modules. Such modules can be assembly robots corresponding to one another with regard to their hardware. These robots receive a respective updated programming in reaction to the respective current production requirement. As well as the flexible adaptation to the production requirements, the use of such modules can in particular be used for the quick exchange of extended stations. Furthermore, the modules can also be constructed to be more complex and can comprise several respective machine tools, racks, robots or similar. In such more complex modules, a plurality of work steps can be carried out respectively. It is, for example, possible to provide such an individual module for each variant of a product to be produced or also to install several modules for the same variant, if a particularly high number of pieces is to be produced. Preferably, such modules then work in parallel, in order to enable particularly high product throughputs. The products of such work stations that work in parallel can be transported further to an individual work station by the transport system, where they are processed further. Such branching and parallelization in the flow of goods into the production plant enable a particularly flexible adaptation of the operation of the production plant to the current production requirements.
Furthermore, it is expedient to provide a predetermined number of unequipped work regions equipped with a work station in case of an increase of the production requirement. By the addition of further work stations in such free work regions, overloading of individual work stations can be compensated for or the number of pieces can be increased to requirement.
Overall, a method is thus created having comparable cycle times to known production plants that are installed in a fixed manner and can, at the same time, be adapted within the shortest amount of time to new requirements due to the flexibility of the transport path, the possibility of the parallel processing of several products in work stations that are connected in parallel as well as the possibility to dispense with transport paths and to join them again.
With the help of the method according to the invention, it can be possible to carry out assembly work, for which hitherto complete assembly lines including the necessary conveyor technology were used, in work stations, which ideally consist only of one assembly table, which is operated by one or two human workers or assembly robots. In this way, a clearly smaller area is needed for the assembly task. Furthermore, the requirement for conveyor technology that is installed in a fixed manner is reduced to the absolutely minimum necessary, which greatly reduces the investment costs.
The invention and its embodiments are described in more detail below by means of the drawing.
Here are shown:
An overall production plant referred to by 10 to produce motor vehicle gears comprises a plurality of work regions in which respective work stations 14 are arranged. The work stations 14 comprises several work tables 16 respectively equipped with lightweight robots 18 as well as several presses 20 or other machine tools necessary for the respective production task. Furthermore, a work station can also comprise racks or storage containers for components.
Unmanned and self-navigating industrial trucks 22 are provided to transport goods between the work stations 14. Further work stations 24 having robots 26 that are installed in a fixed manner serve to provide the parts. In order to enable humans and robots to work in parallel, the robots 18, 26 in this exemplary embodiment are protected by a schematically depicted laser cone 28. If a person moves into the region of the laser cone 28, then the robots 18, 26 are automatically deactivated in order to protect the workers. As an alternative to the laser cones, robots 18, 26 can also be used that have force/torque sensors, with the help of which collisions of the robots 18, 26 with one another, with other elements of the work station or, in particular, with workers can be avoided.
Both the lightweight robots 18 and the tables 16 are able to be arranged freely in the different work regions 12. The work stations 14 can therefore be reconfigured without problem depending on a production requirement, for example a number of pieces or number or variants of the goods to be produced. This relates both to the arrangement in the space and the work tasks carried out by the respective work stations 14. If the tasks of a work station 14 change, then the lightweight robots 18 can be reprogrammed without problem. In order to compensate for overloading of the production plant 10, empty work regions 12 can be provided in which new work stations 14 are constructed in case of an increased production requirement. The order in which the work stations 14 carry out their processing steps can likewise be freely adapted, as no fixed transport systems are necessary. Furthermore, the transport paths between the work stations 14 are set freely by corresponding re-programming of the unmanned industrial trucks 22.
The work stations 14 can carry out identical or different work volumes. Two examples of this are shown in
In a further exemplary embodiment, which is shown in
Preferably, all work stations 14 are designed such that all work carried out at them can be carried out both by lightweight robots 18 and by human workers. If, for example, only a very low number of pieces of a determined variant need to be produced, then work stations 14 for the production of this variant can be replaced with human workers instead of robots, while high numbers of pieces are produced purely robotically. The adaptation of the production to new variants is possible without problem using modifications of individual work stations, such that these production requirements can also be fulfilled within the scope of the described method in the simplest way. Due to the mobility of all components of the production plant 10, an even quicker adaptation of the production plant to the current requirements is possible on a daily basis, which provides this with a fundamentally higher flexibility than in the case of the production plants that are installed in a fixed manner, known from prior art.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/006201 | 12/9/2011 | WO | 00 | 6/6/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/083142 | 6/13/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4304020 | Bonnet | Dec 1981 | A |
4548346 | Kraus | Oct 1985 | A |
4653159 | Henderson | Mar 1987 | A |
4703558 | Makinen | Nov 1987 | A |
4738387 | Jaufmann | Apr 1988 | A |
4773523 | Hansen, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
4815190 | Haba, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
4894908 | Haba, Jr. | Jan 1990 | A |
4928383 | Kaczmarek | May 1990 | A |
4982827 | Seitz | Jan 1991 | A |
5019968 | Wang | May 1991 | A |
5119732 | Lisy | Jun 1992 | A |
5125149 | Inaba | Jun 1992 | A |
5189604 | Lovrenich | Feb 1993 | A |
5210821 | Yazaki | May 1993 | A |
5239739 | Akeel | Aug 1993 | A |
5268837 | Saylor | Dec 1993 | A |
5272805 | Akeel | Dec 1993 | A |
5280431 | Summerville | Jan 1994 | A |
5525882 | Asaka | Jun 1996 | A |
5528116 | Snell | Jun 1996 | A |
5747894 | Hirai | May 1998 | A |
5771553 | Sim | Jun 1998 | A |
5997670 | Walter | Dec 1999 | A |
6213309 | Dadisho | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6429016 | McNeil | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6516239 | Madden | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535786 | Duemler | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6651799 | Rice | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668203 | Cook | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7490710 | Weskamp | Feb 2009 | B1 |
20010032772 | Oldford | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044997 | Oldford | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020073652 | Wiedemann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084762 | Kurokawa | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020157241 | Yamamoto | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198618 | Madden | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050047895 | Lert, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070204454 | Hibbler | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080112787 | Rebstock | May 2008 | A1 |
20090012642 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028669 | Rebstock | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074545 | Lert, Jr. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112343 | Yuan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112350 | Yuan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118858 | Wallace | May 2009 | A1 |
20110110886 | Braddock | May 2011 | A1 |
20110209321 | Kilibarda | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243707 | Dumas | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110282476 | Hegemier | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110314665 | Kilibarda | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120089295 | Ahn | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120165968 | Fontanot | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130325159 | Kilibarda | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130334839 | Grevener | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007432 | Grevener | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042773 | Grevener | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067109 | Kawai | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082918 | Grevener | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140303767 | Klumpp | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140303768 | Klumpp | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
36 14 165 | Oct 1987 | DE |
10 2004 029 665 | Oct 2005 | DE |
10 2007 047 279 | Apr 2009 | DE |
2 606 178 | May 1988 | FR |
63-177208 | Jul 1988 | JP |
8-229757 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2001-1237 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002-36073 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2011-702 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-51056 | Mar 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Office Action issued in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2014-545101 dated Jul. 21, 2015, with partial English translation (Nine (9) pages). |
Japanese Office Action issued in Japanese counterpart application No. 2014-545101 dated Mar. 8, 2016, with partial English translation (Seven (7) pages). |
Corresponding International Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2012, with English Translation (six (6) pages). |
German-language Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) dated Aug. 27, 2012 (seven (7) pages). |
Chinese Office Action issued in Chinese counterpart application No. 201180075406.0 dated May 5, 2016, with partial English translation (Eleven (11) pages). |
Japanese-language Office Action issued in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2014-545101 dated Jan. 24, 2017 with partial English translation (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140288690 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |