Adaptive workstation assembly in production processing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10108186
  • Patent Number
    10,108,186
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 9, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 23, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A method to operate a production plant having a plurality of work regions in which respective work stations are arranged to carry out at least on respective work step, and having at least one transport system that transports goods to be processed on at least one predetermined path between the work stations, involves selecting the arrangement of the work stations, the work step that is able to be carried out by the respective work station, and the at least one predetermined path according to at least one predetermined criterion that is related to a production requirement, and adapting these due to a change of the at least one criterion.
Description
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention relate to a method to operate a production plant having a plurality of work regions.


Production plants known from prior art are usually constructed to be rigid and inflexible. In particular, the conveyor technology used is installed in a fixed manner and therefore does not allow an adaptation of the production plant depending on load.


German patent document DE 10 2004 029 665 discloses a modular transfer system for work pieces that makes it possible to completely dispense with separate conveyor systems. The transfer system comprises a plurality of CNC machines arranged to be directly adjacent to one another and the servo motor drive of which is designed to transfer work pieces between the individual machines.


Furthermore, German patent document DE 10 2007 047 279 A1 discloses a production plant comprising a transport system that is fixedly installed and connects several processing stations to one another. Different work tasks can be carried out at the processing stations depending on load, in order to increase the flexibility of the production line.


Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method that provides a particularly flexible adaptation of the production plant to different production requirements.


Such a method serves to operate a production plant having a plurality of work regions in which respective work stations are arranged to carry out at least on respective work step. Furthermore, such a production plant comprises at least one transport system, by means of which goods to be processed are transported on at least one predetermined path between the work stations. For this purpose, the arrangement of the workstations, the work step that is able to be carried out by the respective work station as well as the at least one predetermined path is selected according to a predetermined criterion that relates to a production requirement and is adapted in the case of a change of the at least one criterion.


As opposed to the method known from prior art to operate production plants, a flexible adaptation of the operation of the production plant to respective current production requirements is enabled by the method according to the invention. The arrangement and the number of work stations, the work steps to be carried out and the connection of the work stations to one another by means of a transport system can be adapted on a daily basis in reaction to changing production requirements. In order to enable this, the components of the production plant are preferably all designed to be moveable, such that new arrangements and transport paths can be created in the shortest amount of time. For this purpose, it is expedient to use lightweight robots that can be re-configured quickly. Unmanned industrial trucks are particularly suitable as a transport system, the industrial trucks, for example, navigating autonomously or following an externally predetermined track that, for example, is laid on the floor. This enables a particularly quick adaptation of the transport path within the production plant, for example by simply giving new commands. Overall, such a particularly flexible method to operate the production plan is created, which enables the plant to adapt very quickly to changing requirements for the number of pieces or variant requirements without having to carry out large re-construction.


Preferably, work stations are used within the scope of the method that are formed as substantially identical modules. Such modules can be assembly robots corresponding to one another with regard to their hardware. These robots receive a respective updated programming in reaction to the respective current production requirement. As well as the flexible adaptation to the production requirements, the use of such modules can in particular be used for the quick exchange of extended stations. Furthermore, the modules can also be constructed to be more complex and can comprise several respective machine tools, racks, robots or similar. In such more complex modules, a plurality of work steps can be carried out respectively. It is, for example, possible to provide such an individual module for each variant of a product to be produced or also to install several modules for the same variant, if a particularly high number of pieces is to be produced. Preferably, such modules then work in parallel, in order to enable particularly high product throughputs. The products of such work stations that work in parallel can be transported further to an individual work station by the transport system, where they are processed further. Such branching and parallelization in the flow of goods into the production plant enable a particularly flexible adaptation of the operation of the production plant to the current production requirements.


Furthermore, it is expedient to provide a predetermined number of unequipped work regions equipped with a work station in case of an increase of the production requirement. By the addition of further work stations in such free work regions, overloading of individual work stations can be compensated for or the number of pieces can be increased to requirement.


Overall, a method is thus created having comparable cycle times to known production plants that are installed in a fixed manner and can, at the same time, be adapted within the shortest amount of time to new requirements due to the flexibility of the transport path, the possibility of the parallel processing of several products in work stations that are connected in parallel as well as the possibility to dispense with transport paths and to join them again.


With the help of the method according to the invention, it can be possible to carry out assembly work, for which hitherto complete assembly lines including the necessary conveyor technology were used, in work stations, which ideally consist only of one assembly table, which is operated by one or two human workers or assembly robots. In this way, a clearly smaller area is needed for the assembly task. Furthermore, the requirement for conveyor technology that is installed in a fixed manner is reduced to the absolutely minimum necessary, which greatly reduces the investment costs.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

The invention and its embodiments are described in more detail below by means of the drawing.


Here are shown:



FIG. 1 a perspective view of a production plant for use with an exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention and



FIG. 2 to 4 three alternative arrangements of work stations for use with an exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An overall production plant referred to by 10 to produce motor vehicle gears comprises a plurality of work regions in which respective work stations 14 are arranged. The work stations 14 comprises several work tables 16 respectively equipped with lightweight robots 18 as well as several presses 20 or other machine tools necessary for the respective production task. Furthermore, a work station can also comprise racks or storage containers for components.


Unmanned and self-navigating industrial trucks 22 are provided to transport goods between the work stations 14. Further work stations 24 having robots 26 that are installed in a fixed manner serve to provide the parts. In order to enable humans and robots to work in parallel, the robots 18, 26 in this exemplary embodiment are protected by a schematically depicted laser cone 28. If a person moves into the region of the laser cone 28, then the robots 18, 26 are automatically deactivated in order to protect the workers. As an alternative to the laser cones, robots 18, 26 can also be used that have force/torque sensors, with the help of which collisions of the robots 18, 26 with one another, with other elements of the work station or, in particular, with workers can be avoided.


Both the lightweight robots 18 and the tables 16 are able to be arranged freely in the different work regions 12. The work stations 14 can therefore be reconfigured without problem depending on a production requirement, for example a number of pieces or number or variants of the goods to be produced. This relates both to the arrangement in the space and the work tasks carried out by the respective work stations 14. If the tasks of a work station 14 change, then the lightweight robots 18 can be reprogrammed without problem. In order to compensate for overloading of the production plant 10, empty work regions 12 can be provided in which new work stations 14 are constructed in case of an increased production requirement. The order in which the work stations 14 carry out their processing steps can likewise be freely adapted, as no fixed transport systems are necessary. Furthermore, the transport paths between the work stations 14 are set freely by corresponding re-programming of the unmanned industrial trucks 22.


The work stations 14 can carry out identical or different work volumes. Two examples of this are shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. In the case of the arrangement according to FIG. 2, a first variant of a component is produced in a first group 30 of three work stations 14. Parallel to this, a second variant of component is produced at a second group 32 of two work stations 14. The products of the work stations 14 of the groups 30 and 32 are then bundled together by transport systems and conducted together to a final assembly station. A particularly high throughput is achieved by the parallel processing. At the same time, the production can be adapted without problem and quickly to changed requirements by the addition of a new group 34 of work stations 14. For example, a further variant of the component to be produced can be taken on in the production process by the addition of a further group 34 or also additional groups that are not shown. For this reason, no changes of any kind have to be made to the already present work stations of the groups 30, 32, which can continue their production unchanged. The addition of work stations 14, which produce an already present variant, is also possible in order to increase the number of pieces produced.


In a further exemplary embodiment, which is shown in FIG. 4, a work station 14 also consists only, as is shown in FIG. 4, of an individual work table 16 having allocated racks or storage containers. This can then be operated by one or several assembly robots 18 or human workers. Ideally, such an individual work table 16 replaces a complete assembly line and therefore creates large free assembly areas, as is depicted in FIG. 4 as an example. Furthermore, the reduction of the assembly line to one individual work table 16 enables the omission of expensive and inflexible conveyor technology that is installed in a fixed manner.


Preferably, all work stations 14 are designed such that all work carried out at them can be carried out both by lightweight robots 18 and by human workers. If, for example, only a very low number of pieces of a determined variant need to be produced, then work stations 14 for the production of this variant can be replaced with human workers instead of robots, while high numbers of pieces are produced purely robotically. The adaptation of the production to new variants is possible without problem using modifications of individual work stations, such that these production requirements can also be fulfilled within the scope of the described method in the simplest way. Due to the mobility of all components of the production plant 10, an even quicker adaptation of the production plant to the current requirements is possible on a daily basis, which provides this with a fundamentally higher flexibility than in the case of the production plants that are installed in a fixed manner, known from prior art.


The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method of operating a production plant having a plurality of work regions in which no work stations are provided, a plurality of nonempty work regions in which respective work stations are arrange to carry out at least one respective work step, and at least one transport system that transports goods to be processed are transported on at least one predetermined path between the work stations, the method comprising: selecting, according to at least one predetermined criterion related to a production requirement, an arrangement of the work stations, the work step that is to be carried out by the respective work station, and the at least one predetermined path;initiating a change in the production requirement of the at least one predetermined criterion;compensating for overloading of the production plant by providing at least one new work station in at least one of the empty work regions; andadapting, according to the change of the at least one predetermined criterion, a current arrangement of the work stations, the work step that is to be carried out by the respective work station, or the at least one predetermined path, wherein the same work steps are carried out in parallel at a number of the work stations, which are selected depending on a quantity of goods to be produced.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the work stations are formed as substantially identical modules.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the work stations is equipped with at least one mobile robot.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein a program of the at least one robot is changed due to: a re-equipping of a work station with the at least one robot;a change of the work station by the at least one robot; ora change of the work step to be carried out by the work station.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of work steps is carried out at each work station.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the same work steps are carried out for different product variants in parallel at a number of the work stations, which are selected depending on a quantity and number of product variants to be produced.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein products of the work stations working in parallel are further transported by the transport system to an individual work station, where the produces are processed further.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein products of the work stations working in parallel are further transported by the transport system to an individual work station, where the produces are processed further.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a predetermined number of unequipped work regions are provided to accommodate a predetermined number of new work stations.
  • 10. The method of claim 2, further comprising transporting goods between the work statins with a self-navigating industrial truck.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the self-navigating industrial truck is unmanned.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/EP2011/006201 12/9/2011 WO 00 6/6/2014
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2013/083142 6/13/2013 WO A
US Referenced Citations (61)
Number Name Date Kind
4304020 Bonnet Dec 1981 A
4548346 Kraus Oct 1985 A
4653159 Henderson Mar 1987 A
4703558 Makinen Nov 1987 A
4738387 Jaufmann Apr 1988 A
4773523 Hansen, Jr. Sep 1988 A
4815190 Haba, Jr. Mar 1989 A
4894908 Haba, Jr. Jan 1990 A
4928383 Kaczmarek May 1990 A
4982827 Seitz Jan 1991 A
5019968 Wang May 1991 A
5119732 Lisy Jun 1992 A
5125149 Inaba Jun 1992 A
5189604 Lovrenich Feb 1993 A
5210821 Yazaki May 1993 A
5239739 Akeel Aug 1993 A
5268837 Saylor Dec 1993 A
5272805 Akeel Dec 1993 A
5280431 Summerville Jan 1994 A
5525882 Asaka Jun 1996 A
5528116 Snell Jun 1996 A
5747894 Hirai May 1998 A
5771553 Sim Jun 1998 A
5997670 Walter Dec 1999 A
6213309 Dadisho Apr 2001 B1
6429016 McNeil Aug 2002 B1
6516239 Madden Feb 2003 B1
6535786 Duemler Mar 2003 B1
6651799 Rice Nov 2003 B1
6668203 Cook Dec 2003 B1
7490710 Weskamp Feb 2009 B1
20010032772 Oldford Oct 2001 A1
20010044997 Oldford Nov 2001 A1
20020073652 Wiedemann Jun 2002 A1
20020084762 Kurokawa Jul 2002 A1
20020157241 Yamamoto Oct 2002 A1
20020198618 Madden Dec 2002 A1
20050047895 Lert, Jr. Mar 2005 A1
20070204454 Hibbler Sep 2007 A1
20080112787 Rebstock May 2008 A1
20090012642 Mertens et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028669 Rebstock Jan 2009 A1
20090074545 Lert, Jr. Mar 2009 A1
20090112343 Yuan Apr 2009 A1
20090112350 Yuan Apr 2009 A1
20090118858 Wallace May 2009 A1
20110110886 Braddock May 2011 A1
20110209321 Kilibarda Sep 2011 A1
20110243707 Dumas Oct 2011 A1
20110282476 Hegemier Nov 2011 A1
20110314665 Kilibarda Dec 2011 A1
20120089295 Ahn Apr 2012 A1
20120165968 Fontanot Jun 2012 A1
20130325159 Kilibarda Dec 2013 A1
20130334839 Grevener Dec 2013 A1
20140007432 Grevener Jan 2014 A1
20140042773 Grevener Feb 2014 A1
20140067109 Kawai Mar 2014 A1
20140082918 Grevener Mar 2014 A1
20140303767 Klumpp Oct 2014 A1
20140303768 Klumpp Oct 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
36 14 165 Oct 1987 DE
10 2004 029 665 Oct 2005 DE
10 2007 047 279 Apr 2009 DE
2 606 178 May 1988 FR
63-177208 Jul 1988 JP
8-229757 Sep 1996 JP
2001-1237 Jan 2001 JP
2002-36073 Feb 2002 JP
2011-702 Jan 2011 JP
2011-51056 Mar 2011 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Japanese Office Action issued in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2014-545101 dated Jul. 21, 2015, with partial English translation (Nine (9) pages).
Japanese Office Action issued in Japanese counterpart application No. 2014-545101 dated Mar. 8, 2016, with partial English translation (Seven (7) pages).
Corresponding International Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2012, with English Translation (six (6) pages).
German-language Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) dated Aug. 27, 2012 (seven (7) pages).
Chinese Office Action issued in Chinese counterpart application No. 201180075406.0 dated May 5, 2016, with partial English translation (Eleven (11) pages).
Japanese-language Office Action issued in counterpart Japanese Application No. 2014-545101 dated Jan. 24, 2017 with partial English translation (6 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140288690 A1 Sep 2014 US