Adding a laplace transform zero to a linear integrated circuit for frequency stability

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6304067
  • Patent Number
    6,304,067
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 8, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 16, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A compensation circuit for introducing a zero in a first circuit being incorporated in a closed loop feedback system includes a first capacitor, an amplifier and a second capacitor, connected in series between a feedback terminal and an input node of the first circuit. A first resistor is coupled between the feedback terminal and the input node to provide a resistive load to the compensation circuit. The amplifier amplifies the capacitance of the second capacitor to introduce a zero in the first circuit having effectiveness over a wide frequency range. In one embodiment, the compensation circuit is applied to a switching regulator controller for adding an effective zero in the feedback system of a switching regulator for compensating a double-pole introduced by a LC filter circuit in the switching regulator feedback system.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to a circuit and method for adding a Laplace transform zero to a linear integrated circuit, and more particularly to a circuit and method for adding a Laplace transform zero in a switching regulator feedback loop for providing frequency stability.




2. Description of the Related Art




Closed loop negative feedback systems are commonly employed in linear integrated circuits. For instance, switching regulators use a feedback loop to monitor the output voltage in order to provide regulation. To ensure stability in any closed loop system, the Nyquist criterion must be met. The Nyquist criterion states that a closed loop system is stable if the phase shift around the loop is less than 180 degrees at unity gain. Typically, a compensation circuit is added to a feedback loop to modulate the phase shift of the feedback loop to obtain stability.




The frequency response of a linear circuit can be characterized by the presence of “poles” and “zeros”. A “pole” is a mathematical term which signifies the complex frequency at which gain reduction begins. On the other hand, a “zero” signifies the complex frequency at which gain increase starts. Poles and zeros on the left half plane of a complex frequency plane or s-plane are considered normal and can be compensated. However, poles and zeros on the right half plane of a complex frequency plane are usually problematic and difficult to manipulate and is not addressed in the present application. Generally, a pole contributes a −90° phase shift while a zero contributes a +90° phase shift. A pole cancels out the phase shift of a zero for zeros in the left half plane. In designing a closed loop system with compensation, the location of the poles and zeros are manipulated so as to avoid a greater than 180° phase shift at unity gain.




In a linear circuit, poles are created by placing a small capacitor on a node with a high dynamic impedance. If the capacitor is placed at a gain stage, the capacitance can be multiplied by the gain of the stage to increase its effectiveness. Each pole has a zero associated with it. That is, at some point, the dynamic resistance of the gain stage will limit the gain loss capable of being achieved by the capacitor. Thus, a zero can be created by placing a resistor in series with the gain reduction capacitor.




A conventional voltage mode switching regulator uses an inductor-capacitor (LC) network at the voltage output terminal for filtering the regulated output voltage to produce a relatively constant DC output voltage.

FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of a conventional switching regulator including a switching regulator controller


10


and an LC circuit


11


. Switching regulator controller


10


generates a regulated output voltage V


sw


at an output terminal


13


which is coupled to LC circuit


11


for providing a filtered output voltage V


OUT


. The output voltage V


OUT


is coupled back to controller


10


at a feedback (FB) terminal


15


for forming a feedback control loop. The LC circuit has associated with it two poles, one pole associated with each element. If the feedback control loop is not compensated, LC circuit


11


alone contributes an −180°. phase shift to the system and loop instability results, causing the output voltage to oscillate. Because virtually every switching regulator uses an LC filter circuit to filter the regulated output voltage, compensation must be provided in the feedback control loop of a switching regulator to compensate for the effect of the two poles introduced by the LC circuit.




A conventional compensation technique in switching regulators involves adding a circuit in series with the feedback loop which produces a Laplace zero. The zero is added to the feedback control loop to cancel out one of the two poles of the LC filter circuit, thus insuring closed loop stability. U.S. Pat. No. 5,382,918 to Yamatake describes using a capacitance multiplying op-amp to provide a large effective capacitance and a resistor in series as the frequency compensation element of a switching regulator. U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,947 to Berg describes a phase lead compensation circuit for providing additional phase to the loop gain of a switching regulator near the unity gain frequency. The phase lead compensation circuit of Berg uses a transconductance amplifier driving a frequency-dependent load, implemented as a band-limited op amp, in the feedback control loop of the switching regulator. These approaches are problematic because they both require a “high quality” differential amplifier in operation which are significantly large and complex to realize. In practice, differential amplifiers are typically large devices and can be relatively slow. Furthermore, the differential amplifiers tend to sink large amounts of current proportional to speed. The compensation approaches described by Yamatake and Berg are undesirable because the compensation techniques require sacrificing speed for closed loop stability. In addition the op-amp used in the compensation circuit needs to be compensated for stability itself, making the circuit more complex to implement.





FIG. 1

illustrates another approach for providing compensation in a feedback control loop of a switching regulator. Referring to

FIG. 1

, the output voltage V


OUT


is coupled to the feedback terminal


15


and further to a voltage divider including resistors R


1


and R


2


. The operation of the feedback control loop in controller


10


is well known in the art. The voltage divider steps down output voltage V


OUT


and the divided voltage V


R


is coupled to an error amplifier


20


which compares the divided voltage V


R


to a reference voltage V


Ref


. Error amplifier


20


generates an error output signal indicative of the difference between voltage V


R


and reference voltage V


Ref


. The feedback control loop of controller


10


operates to regulate the output voltage V


OUT


based on the error output of error amplifier


20


so that voltage V


R


equals voltage V


Ref


.





FIG. 2



a


is a plot of the loop gain magnitude vs. frequency in log scale for the switching regulator of

FIG. 1

without any compensation. The low frequency loop gain is first reduced by a pole associated with error amplifier


20


. The gain loss is modified by a zero also associated with the error amplifier. Then, at high frequency, the effect of the double-pole in the LC filter circuit causes a large loss in the loop gain such that the phase shift at unity gain is equal to or greater than 180°. The feedback control loop of the uncompensated switching regulator of

FIG. 1

is unstable unless the gain is substantially reduced.




In the switching regulator of

FIG. 1

, a capacitor


18


(typically referred to as a “zero capacitor”) is connected in parallel to resistor R


1


of the voltage divider.




Capacitor


18


introduces a zero-pole pair in the feedback loop. The location (or frequency) of the zero-pole pair is determined by the resistance of the voltage divider and the capacitance of capacitor


18


. For practical resistance and capacitance values, the zero and pole introduced by capacitor


18


are typically located close to each other so that the zero is canceled out quickly by the nearby associated pole.

FIG. 2



b


is a plot of the loop gain magnitude vs. frequency in log scale in the switching regulator of

FIG. 1

incorporating zero capacitor


18


. Here, the operation of the zero capacitor ensures that the phase shift is less than 180° near unity gain. However, the compensation provided by zero capacitor


18


is limited and often does not provide sufficient phase margin at unity gain. For example, at high frequency, zero capacitor


18


shorts out resistor R


1


, resulting in no or minimal gain loss in the feedback loop. Thus, the compensation provided by capacitor


18


is not effective at high frequency. Also, the voltage divider of resistors R


1


and R


2


typically provides only a gain loss of 3 dB. The 3 dB gain loss limits the ratio of the pole to zero angular frequency of capacitor


18


, and thus, limits the compensation range capable of being achieved by the use of a single zero capacitor


18


. The feedback loop of switching regulator of

FIG. 1

is susceptible to instability when the switching regulator is subjected to fluctuations in the load impedance because of this limited compensation range.




Thus, it is desirable to provide a compensation circuit in a feedback loop of a linear circuit which is capable of providing effective pole cancellation.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to one embodiment of the present invention, a compensation circuit for introducing a zero in a first circuit being incorporated in a closed loop feedback system is provided. The first circuit includes a first terminal generating a first voltage for the closed loop feedback system and a feedback terminal for receiving a feedback voltage from the closed loop feedback system and coupling the feedback voltage to an input node in the first circuit. The compensation circuit includes a first capacitor, an amplifier and a second capacitor. The first capacitor is coupled between the feedback terminal of the first circuit and a first node. The first capacitor receives the feedback voltage at the feedback terminal and functions to block out the DC component of the feedback voltage. The amplifier is coupled between the first node and a second node. The second capacitor is coupled between the second node and the input node of the first circuit. The compensation circuit further includes a first resistor coupled between the feedback terminal and the input node for providing a resistive load to the compensation circuit.




The compensation circuit amplifies the capacitance of the second capacitor and introduces a zero in the first circuit effective for pole-cancellation in the closed loop feedback system. Furthermore, the zero introduced by the compensation circuit has effectiveness over a wide range of frequencies.




In one embodiment, the compensation circuit of the present invention is applied to a switching regulator controller circuit for providing an effective zero in the feedback loop of a switching regulator. The zero acts to compensate for the effect of the double-pole introduced by the LC filter circuit generally applied to the regulated output voltage of the switching regulator controller circuit.




The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below and the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of a conventional switching regulator including a zero capacitor for compensation.





FIG. 2



a


is a loop gain vs. frequency plot for a conventional feedback system in a switching regulator without zero compensation.





FIG. 2



b


is a loop gain vs. frequency plot for a feedback system in a switching regulator including a zero capacitor for compensation.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a switching regulator including a switching regulator controller incorporating a zero generation circuit according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a loop gain vs. frequency plot for the feedback system of the switching regulator in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a circuit diagram of a zero generation circuit implemented using CMOS devices according to one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a schematic diagram of a switching regulator controller incorporating a zero generation circuit according to another embodiment of the present invention.











In the present disclosure, like objects which appear in more than one figure are provided with like reference numerals.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In accordance with the present invention, a zero generation circuit for adding a Laplace transform zero in a linear or analog circuit includes a blocking capacitor and an open loop amplifier coupled to a zero capacitor for multiplying the capacitance of the zero capacitor. The zero generation circuit provides a wide band and effective zero for pole cancellation in a linear circuit for obtaining frequency stability. The zero generation circuit of the resent invention has the advantages of consuming a small circuit area and being power efficient, drawing only a small bias current. Furthermore, the zero generation circuit can operate at high frequency to provide compensation for a large frequency range. The zero generation circuit of the present invention can be applied in switching voltage regulators and other closed loop feedback systems with multiple poles for introducing an effective “zero” compensation and improving frequency stability.




In the present description, a “zero” and a “pole” have meanings well understood by one skilled in the art. Specifically, a “zero” refers to the complex frequency at which the frequency response of a linear circuit has a zero amplitude, and a “pole” refers to the complex frequency at which the frequency response of a linear circuit has an infinite amplitude. In a feedback system, a pole signifies the frequency at which gain reduction begins while a zero signifies the frequency at which gain increase starts.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a switching regulator including a switching regulator controller incorporating a zero generation circuit according to one embodiment of the present invention. The circuitry of switching regulator controller


330


is conventional except for the zero generation circuit


310


. Switching regulator controller


330


generates a regulated output voltage V


SW


on an output terminal


302


. The regulated output voltage V


SW


is coupled to an LC filter circuit


11


to generate an output voltage V


OUT


having substantially constant magnitudes. Switching regulator


300


, constructed using controller


330


and LC circuit


11


, forms a closed loop feedback system for regulating output voltage V


SW


and consequently, the output voltage V


OUT


. The output voltage V


OUT


from LC filter circuit


11


is fed back to controller


330


on a feedback terminal


304


. Typically, the output voltage V


OUT


is coupled to a voltage divider including resistors R


1


and R


2


and generating in feedback voltage VFB is coupled to the control circuitry of controller


330


. In

FIG. 3

, the control circuitry of controller


330






In the feedback loop of switching regulator


300


, error amplifier


308


has associated with it a pole and a zero. The pole and zero within error amplifier


308


are typically easy to generate because error amplifier


308


includes high impedance nodes. However, it is difficult to generate more than one pole or zero within error amplifier


308


. On the other hand, LC filter circuit


11


introduces two poles to the feedback loop of switching regulator


300


which need to be compensated. In the present embodiment, a zero generation circuit


310


is incorporated in controller


330


to introduce a zero to the feedback loop of switching regulator


300


, in addition to the zero generated by the error amplifier. Zero generation circuit


310


functions to ensure that the feedback system of switching regulator


300


meets the Nyquist criterion for frequency stability.




According to one embodiment of the present embodiment, zero generation circuit


310


includes a blocking capacitor C


B


, an amplifier AZ, and a zero capacitor C


Z


, connected in series between feedback terminal


304


and feedback voltage V


FB


(node


306


). In

FIG. 3

, circuit


310


is illustrated with a resistor R


Z1


, between capacitor C


B


and amplifier AZ and with a resistor R


Z2


between amplifier AZ and capacitor C


Z


drawn in dotted line. Resistors R


Z1


and R


Z2


are illustrative only and are used to represent the equivalent input impedance and the equivalent output impedance, respectively, of amplifier AZ. Although resistors R


Z1


and R


Z2


are not meant to be actual elements or components in an actual implementation of circuit


310


, circuit


310


may include resistors as needed for the implementation of amplifier AZ or for other purposes. As will be explained in more detail below, one embodiment of amplifier AZ includes an input resistor R


ZI


which, when combined with the gain of the first gain stage in amplifier AZ, creates the input impedance R


Z1


shown in FIG.


3


.




In operation, capacitor C


B


receives output voltage V


OUT


on feedback terminal


304


and functions to block out the DC component of output voltage V


OUT


. Amplifier AZ amplifies the AC component of output voltage V


OUT


provided by capacitor C


B


before coupling the AC signal to zero capacitor C


Z


. The amplification function performed by amplifier AZ has the effect of amplifying the capacitance of capacitor C


z


such that capacitor C


z


can be implemented as a smaller capacitor while capable of introducing an effective zero in the feedback system. Furthermore, the AC signal amplification provided by amplifier AZ is also capable of introducing a zero having a wide range of applicability so that the zero is effective over a wide band of frequency. The zero signal generated by capacitor C


Z


is summed with feedback voltage V


FB


at node


306


before the feedback voltage V


FB


is coupled to the control circuitry of controller


330


. In

FIG. 3

, the summed feedback voltage is coupled to error amplifier


308


.




The transfer function from the feedback voltage V


FB


to the error output (denoted voltage V


EOUT


), in the limiting conditions of R


1


>>R


Z2


, A


Z


>=1 and r˜1, is given as follows:












V
FB


V
EOUT





1
r




(



A
Z

*

C
Z

*

R
1

*
s

+
1

)


(



(


R
1

/
r

)

*

C
Z

*
s

+
1

)




,




(1)













where A


Z


is the gain of amplifier AZ, s is the complex frequency of the Laplace transform and r is given as:









r
=



R
1


R
2


+
1.





(2)













Equation (1) above yields a pole and a zero angular frequency as follows:






ω


Z


=1/A


Z


*R


1


*C


Z


, and   (3)








ω


P


=1/(R


1


/r)*C


Z


.   (4)






As can be seen from equation (3) above, resistor R


1


of the voltage divider of controller


330


provides the resistive load to capacitor C


Z


and amplifier AZ for adding a zero in the feedback system. On the other hand, while in equation (4), both resistors R


1


and R


2


are used to provide a resistive load for introducing the pole of zero generation circuit


310


, resistor R


2


is not critical for the placement of the pole and can be omitted in other embodiments of the present invention. When resistor R


2


is omitted (that is, resistance of resistor R


2


is infinite), the factor r has a value of 1 (equation 2) and the angular frequency of the pole, ω


p


, depends only on the resistive load of R


1


.




The ratio of pole angular frequency (equation 4 above) to the zero angular frequency (equation 3 above) is given as follows:











ω
P


ω
Z


=


A
Z

*

r
.






(5)













By adjusting the gain A


Z


of amplifier AZ, a very effective and wide band zero for pole cancellation can be generated in the feedback system of switching regulator


300


. Referring to equation (5) above, in a conventional feedback system without any “zero” amplification, i. e., when the gain A


Z


is equal to 1, the ratio of the pole to zero angular frequency is equal to r and is approximately 2. On the other hand, in a feedback system employing zero generation circuit


310


, even when amplifier AZ only has a modest gain of


10


, a pole-to-zero frequency ratio of


20


can be obtained. Thus, the zero generation circuit of the present invention is effective in generating a zero with a much broader effective range than that can be obtained with the conventional compensation techniques.





FIG. 4

is a loop gain vs. frequency plot (in log scale) for the feedback system of the switching regulator of FIG.


3


.

FIG. 4

illustrates the effect on the loop gain vs. frequency behavior of switching regulator


300


after zero generation circuit


310


introduces a zero in the feedback system of the switching regulator. Referring to

FIG. 4

, the pole and zero of error amplifier


308


first diminishes the low frequency loop gain of switching regulator


300


. At frequency f


1


, the double-pole of LC filter circuit


11


takes effect. At high frequency, the zero introduced by zero generation circuit


310


(also called the “amplified zero”) takes effect. If the onset of the effect of the amplified zero is perfectly matched to the position of double-pole LC filter circuit


11


, then the amplified zero will cancel out the effect of one of the double poles. As shown in

FIG. 4

, the zero-pole pair of the amplified zero is spread much further apart in frequency range than that of the conventional single zero capacitor compensation circuit as shown in

FIG. 2



b


. The wide-range spacing of the zero-pole pair of circuit


310


allows for a wider design latitude either for optimizing compensation or for increasing loop gain. Zero generation circuit


310


of the present invention amplifies the effect of the zero of zero capacitor C


Z


. The action of amplifier AZ introduces a zero having a wide range of effectiveness. Therefore, the placement of the zero in the feedback system is not as critical as in conventional systems. Consequently, zero generation circuit


310


has more tolerance for variations in capacitance values of capacitor C


Z


. Zero generation circuit


310


improves the overall performance of switching regulator


300


.




Amplifier AZ of zero generation circuit


310


is an open loop amplifier and can be implemented as any conventional gain stages known in the art.

FIG. 5

is a circuit diagram of a zero generation circuit implemented using CMOS devices according to one embodiment of the present invention. Capacitors C


B


and C


Z


can be implemented as any conventional capacitor structures and in the present embodiment, capacitors C


B


and C


Z


are MOS capacitors. Capacitor C


Z


can have a capacitance value between 1 to 5 picofarads while capacitor C


B


has a capacitance value about one-fifth of capacitor C


Z


. As described above, capacitor C


B


functions to block out the DC component of the output voltage V


OUT


presented at the circuit input node


520


. Thus, the voltage V


1


at the other side of capacitor C


B


(node


501


) is the AC component of the output voltage V


OUT


. In the present embodiment, amplifier AZ is implemented as a two-stage gain block with self-biasing capability. The first gain stage includes a resistor R


ZI


coupled between nodes


501


and


505


and an NMOS transistor


506


biased by a current mirror. Resistor R


ZI


and the gain of the first gain stage create the effective input impedance R


Z1


of amplifier AZ. Resistor R


Z1


can be implemented as a diffused resistor or a polysilicon resistor. In the present embodiment, resistor R


ZI


, is a diffused resistor having a resistance value of approximately 400 kΩ. The current mirror of the first gain stage is implemented by PMOS transistor


502


. The gate terminal of transistor


502


is coupled to a reference voltage V


Refp


for generating a reference current I


refp


at the drain terminal (node


505


) of transistor


502


. The source terminal of transistor


502


is coupled to a power supply terminal


503


providing a supply voltage V


DD


. NMOS transistor


506


has its gate terminal connected to node


501


and its drain and source terminals connected between node


505


and a ground node


509


. Thus, transistor


506


amplifies the voltage V


1


, and generates an output voltage V


2


at node


505


. The second gain stage of amplifier AZ includes an NMOS transistor


508


biased by a current mirror including a PMOS transistor


504


. PMOS transistor


504


is connected in an analogous manner as PMOS transistor


502


and generates a reference current I


refp


at the drain terminal (node


507


) of transistor


504


. NMOS transistor


508


has its gate terminal coupled to node


505


and amplifies the voltage V


2


to provide an output voltage V


3


at output node


507


. The amplified voltage V


3


is coupled to zero capacitor C


Z


. The action of amplifier voltage V


3


and zero capacitor C


Z


introduces a zero at a circuit output node


521


having more effectiveness than a zero introduced by conventional compensation circuits. In the present embodiment, PMOS transistors


502


and


504


are of the same sizes while NMOS transistors


506


and


508


are also of the same sizes. In one embodiment, PMOS transistors


502


and


504


each has a width of 20 μm and a length of 3μm. On the other hand, NMOS transistors


506


and


508


each has a width of 6 μm and a length of 2 μm.




The zero generation circuit of the present invention achieves advantages not obtainable in conventional compensation circuits. First, the zero generation circuit utilizes common circuit components and is simple to implement. Contrary to conventional compensation techniques where a closed loop amplifier is used to set the proper gain and phase for the zero function, the zero generation circuit of the present invention simply modulates the location or placement of the zero generated by a zero capacitor. When applied in a switching regulator controller, the zero generation circuit of the present invention is connected to the voltage divider already present in the controller and requires little modification of the overall controller design. The circuit of the present invention avoids adding complex and space consuming compensation circuits to the switching regulator controller as is done the prior art. Second, the zero generation circuit is small in size and thus, is cost effective to incorporate in any linear circuits. Because the capacitance of zero capacitor C


Z


is amplified by the action of amplifier AZ, a small capacitor C


Z


can be used, resulting in a smaller circuit area in implementation. Through the use of CMOS devices and an open loop amplifier AZ, the zero generation circuit can be operated at very high frequency. Furthermore, the zero generated in the zero generation circuit of the present invention has effectiveness over a wide range of frequencies and thus the circuit can tolerate variations in manufacturing processes and fluctuations in the load impedance.




In the above embodiment, the zero generation circuit is incorporated in a controller for a fixed switching regulator having an internal voltage divider. As mentioned above, resistor R


1


of the voltage divider in controller


330


is used to provide a resistive load to zero generation circuit


310


for introducing an effective zero at node


306


. In another embodiment of the present invention, the zero generation circuit of the present invention can also be incorporated in a switching regulator controller for an adjustable switching regulator as illustrated in FIG.


6


. Referring to

FIG. 6

, in an adjustable switching regulator


600


, an external voltage divider, including resistors R


E1


, and R


E2


, are used for stepping down the output voltage V


OUT


. The output of the voltage divider of resistors R


E1


, and R


E2


generates the feedback voltage V


FB


to be coupled to switching regulator controller


630


on a feedback terminal


604


to form the feedback loop for regulating the output voltage V


SW


. In conventional switching regulator controllers, the feedback voltage V


FB


is coupled directly to error amplifier


608


. However, in accordance with the present embodiment, a zero generation circuit


610


is incorporated into switching regulator controller


630


to generate an effective zero for compensating the double-pole of the LC filter circuit in the feedback system of adjustable switching regulator


600


. In switching regulator controller


630


, zero generation circuit


610


is coupled between feedback terminal


604


and a node


606


which is the inverting input terminal of error amplifier


608


. The structure and operation of zero generation circuit


610


is the same as circuit


310


described above. Basically, capacitor C


B


blocks out the DC components of the feedback voltage V


FB


and amplifier AZ amplifies the AC components of the feedback voltage and couples the amplified voltage signal to zero capacitor C


Z


. In the case of the adjustable switching regulator, zero generation circuit


610


further includes a resistor R


1


connected in parallel to the capacitors and amplifier circuit elements of the zero generation circuit (i. e. between node


604


and node


606


). Resistor R


1


is used to provide a resistive load to zero generation circuit


610


for introducing an effective zero at node


606


. In the present embodiment, the resistance of resistor R


1


is between 100 k to 200 k ohms. In one embodiment, resistor R


1


of circuit


610


is the same resistor R


1


in the voltage divider of switching regulator controller


330


of fixed switching regulator


300


. Thus, controller


630


for an adjustable switching regulator can be built using the same circuit design as controller


330


for a fixed switching regulator except that, for controller


630


, resistor R


2


of the voltage divider of controller


330


is disconnected from node


606


. Zero generation circuit


610


generates a wide band zero for effective pole-cancellation in the feedback system of switching regulator


600


and ensures that the switching regulator can achieve frequency stability in operation.




The above detailed descriptions are provided to illustrate specific embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to be limiting. Numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention are possible. For example, while the above descriptions describe incorporating the zero generating circuit of the present invention in a switching regulator controller, the zero generating circuit of the present invention can be incorporated in any linear circuits being operated in a closed loop feedback system to ensure frequency stability. Also, while the implementation of the zero generation circuit has been described using CMOS devices, the circuit can also be implemented using bipolar devices to provide the same frequency stabilizing result. Lastly, while in the present descriptions, the voltage divider of controller


330


includes two resistors R


1


and R


2


, a person of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the voltage divider can be implemented using any numbers of resistors to produce the desired divided voltage. The present invention is defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A compensation circuit for introducing a zero in a first circuit being incorporated in a closed loop feedback system, said first circuit including a first terminal generating a first voltage for said closed loop feedback system, a feedback terminal for receiving a feedback voltage from said closed loop feedback system, said feedback terminal coupling said feedback voltage to an input node in said first circuit, said compensation circuit comprising:a first capacitor coupled between said feedback terminal of said first circuit and a first node, said first capacitor blocking out the DC component of said feedback voltage; an amplifier coupled between said first node and a second node; a second capacitor coupled between said second node and said input node of said first circuit; and a first resistor coupled between said feedback terminal and said input node of said first circuit.
  • 2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said amplifier amplifies a capacitance of said second capacitor for introducing a zero in said first circuit.
  • 3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said amplifier is an open loop amplifier.
  • 4. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said amplifier comprises:a second resistor coupled between said first node and a third node; a first transistor having a control terminal coupled to said first node, a first current handling terminal coupled to said third node and a second current handling terminal coupled to a first power supply; a first current mirror having an input terminal coupled to receive a first bias voltage and an output terminal coupled to said third node and providing a first bias current to said first transistor; a second transistor having a control terminal coupled to said third node, a first current handling terminal coupled to said second node and a second current handling terminal coupled to said first power supply; and a second current mirror having an input terminal coupled to receive said first bias voltage and an output terminal coupled to said second node and providing a second bias current to said second transistor.
  • 5. The circuit of claim 4, wherein said first and second transistors are NMOS transistors.
  • 6. The circuit of claim 4, wherein each of said first and second current mirrors comprises a PMOS transistors having its gate terminal coupled to said first bias voltage, a first current handling terminal providing a bias current and a second current handling terminal coupled to a second power supply.
  • 7. The circuit of claim 6, wherein said first power supply is ground and said second power supply is a positive power supply.
  • 8. The circuit of claim 4, wherein said second resistor is a diffused resistor.
  • 9. The circuit of claim 1, wherein each of said first and second capacitors comprises a diffused lower plate, an insulator, and a conductive material overlaying said insulator as an upper plate.
  • 10. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said second capacitor has a capacitance of about 1 to 5 picofarads and said first capacitor has a capacitance of about one-fifth of said second capacitor.
  • 11. A switching regulator controller circuit comprising:an output terminal providing a signal corresponding to a regulated output voltage; a feedback terminal for receiving a feedback voltage corresponding to said regulated output voltage; a control circuit including an input node coupled to receive a voltage corresponding to said feedback voltage, and an output node generating said signal corresponding to said regulated output voltage and coupling said signal to said output terminal; a first capacitor coupled between said feedback terminal and a first node, said first capacitor for blocking out the DC component of said feedback voltage; an amplifier coupled between said first node and a second node; a second capacitor coupled between said second node and said input node of said control circuit; and a first resistor coupled between said feedback terminal and said input node of said control circuit.
  • 12. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said feedback voltage is a divided voltage of said regulated output voltage.
  • 13. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said feedback voltage is said regulated output voltage and said feedback terminal is coupled to a voltage divider in said switching regulator controller circuit, said first resistor being a part of said voltage divider.
  • 14. The circuit of claim 13, wherein said voltage divider comprises at least two resistors connected in series and provides a first divided feedback voltage to said input node of said control circuit.
  • 15. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said amplifier amplifies a capacitance of said second capacitor for introducing a zero in said switching regulator controller circuit.
  • 16. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said amplifier is an open loop amplifier.
  • 17. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said amplifier comprises:a second resistor coupled between said first node and a third node; a first transistor having a control terminal coupled to said first node, a first current handling terminal coupled to said third node and a second current handling terminal coupled to a first power supply; a first current mirror having an input terminal coupled to receive a first bias voltage and an output terminal coupled to said third node and providing a first bias current to said first transistor; a second transistor having a control terminal coupled to said third node, a first current handling terminal coupled to said second node and a second current handling terminal coupled to said first power supply; and a second current mirror having an input terminal coupled to receive said first bias voltage and an output terminal coupled to said second node and providing a second bias current to said second transistor.
  • 18. The circuit of claim 17, wherein said first and second transistors are NMOS transistors.
  • 19. The circuit of claim 17, wherein each of said first and second current mirrors comprises a PMOS transistors having its gate terminal coupled to said first bias voltage, a first current handling terminal providing a bias current and a second current handling terminal coupled to a second power supply.
  • 20. The circuit of claim 19, wherein said first power supply is ground and said second power supply is a positive power supply.
  • 21. The circuit of claim 17, wherein said second resistor is a diffused resistor.
  • 22. The circuit of claim 11, wherein each of said first and second capacitors comprises a diffused lower plate, an insulator, and a conductive material overlaying said insulator as an upper plate.
  • 23. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said second capacitor has a capacitance of about 1 to 5 picofarads and said first capacitor has a capacitance of about one-fifth of said second capacitor.
  • 24. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said control circuit comprises:an error amplifier having a first input terminal coupled to said input node, a second input terminal coupled to a reference voltage and an output terminal providing an output voltage indicative of the difference between a voltage at said first input terminal and said reference voltage at said second input terminal.
  • 25. The circuit of claim 11, wherein said output terminal of said switching regulator controller circuit is coupled to an output filter circuit for generating said regulated output voltage.
  • 26. The circuit of claim 25, wherein said output filter circuit comprises an inductor and a capacitor connected in series between said output terminal and a ground terminal.
  • 27. A method for providing zero compensation in a first circuit incorporated in a closed loop feedback system, said method comprising:applying a feedback voltage at a first node of said first circuit to a first capacitor; filtering out the DC component from said feedback voltage using said first capacitor; amplifying said filtered feedback voltage; applying said amplified filtered feedback voltage to a second capacitor coupled to a second node of said first circuit; coupling a resistive load between said first node and said second node; and introducing a zero at said second node in said first circuit as a result of coupling said amplified filtered feedback voltage to said second capacitor.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein said applying said amplified filtered feedback voltage to a second capacitor functions to amplify the capacitance of said second capacitor for introducing a zero for canceling a pole in said closed loop feedback system.
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
5382918 Yamatake Jan 1995
5514947 Berg May 1996
5770940 Goder Jun 1998
5889393 Wrathall Mar 1999
5894243 Hwang Apr 1999
6150804 Taghizadeh-Kaschani Nov 2000