Addition of magnesium oxide to zirconia toughened alumina

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8679995
  • Patent Number
    8,679,995
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 24, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 25, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The present application is directed to a zirconia toughened alumina body and process for making the body. The process involves combining tetragonally stabilized ZrO2 nanoparticles, Mg(OH)2 particles and alumina powder into a mixture. All particles of the mixture are milled, formed into a green compact and then sintered. The final composition of the body includes α-Al2O3 toughened with 0.5 to 2.5 weight percent ZrO2 in a stabilized tetragonal form and 0.03 to 0.10 weight percent MgO. The composition results in an Al2O3 body with a density less than 4.0 g/cc and strength greater than 50 kpsi.
Description
FIELD

This patent application generally relates to zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA). More specifically it relates to a composition and method of toughening alumina with stabilized zirconia and magnesium oxide.


BACKGROUND

Standard zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) is produced in industry by taking alpha alumina (α-Al2O3) and adding 10-25 percent by weight of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (TZP) to strengthen and toughen the alumina as taught by Hori in U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,224. TZP is a tetragonal form of zirconia, this tetragonal crystal structure phase is a metastable form of the zirconia that is stabilized by a stabilizing agent so as not to revert back to the monoclinic crystal structure phase upon cooling from the sintering temperature. Common stabilizing agents are Y2O3 and CeO2 that when combined with zirconia (ZrO2) in an effective composition gives rise to TZP. Standard ZTA of 10-25 weight percent TZP has a theoretical density of 4.10-4.35 g/cc and strength of greater than 80 kpsi. Hori showed for compositions of TZP below 10-percent by weight that the strength of the alumina drops significantly to around 48 kpsi, near that of just pure alumina. However, pure alumina is much lighter with a theoretical density of around 3.98 g/cc.


Lighter weight formulations of ZTA with high strength have been difficult to produce. Lighter weight, stronger ZTA has applications in armor and wear-tiles for chimney chutes where lower density coupled with higher strength is required. It is the goal of the present patent application to provide a lighter weight and stronger formulation of ZTA.


SUMMARY

One aspect of the present patent application is directed to a ceramic, comprising 0.5 to 2.5 weight percent ZrO2 in the form of crystalline grains that are stabilized in a substantially tetragonal crystal structure, 0.03 to 0.10 weight percent MgO in the form of crystalline grains, and the remainder of the ceramic being substantially α-Al2O3. The ceramic has an actual density of less than 4.0 g/cc. The ceramic has strength greater than 50 kpsi.


Another aspect of the present patent application is directed to a method of fabricating a ceramic, comprising the steps of providing (i) crystalline Al2O3 particles, (ii) 0.5-2.5 percent by weight of crystalline ZrO2 particles less than 0.1-microns that are stabilized in substantially the tetragonal crystal structure, and (iii) 0.043-0.144 percent by weight crystalline Mg(OH)2 particles. The method then involves combining and milling all particles to have a D50 diameter of less than 1-micron. The method further involves forming a green compact and sintering the green compact in a temperature range of 1637° C. to 1660° C.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A new formulation of ZTA that is lighter in weight than standard ZTA (10-25 percent by weight ZrO2), but that is stronger than non-toughened alumina has been formulated. Yittria tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (YTZP) has a theoretical density of around 6.1 g/cc and is much denser than pure α-Al2O3 that has a theoretical density of around 3.98 g/cc, so incorporating less YTZP will make the material lighter. Standard ZTA of 25-percent by weight of YTZP has a theoretical density of 4.35 g/cc. The new material with about 1-to-2 percent by weight YTZP has an actual density of only 3.92-3.95 g/cc. Less than 2.5 weight percent YTZP keeps density of the final ceramic under 4.0 g/cc, while more than 0.5 weight percent YTZP helps add some strength to the ceramic. By itself the small amount of YTZP added to the α-Al2O3, however, does not dramatically increase the strength of the alumina as the grain size of the alumina still grows during processing to grain sizes of 6-to-20 microns during high temperature processing of 1637° C.-1660° C. The large grain size equates to lower strength. MgO is known to be a grain growth inhibitor, however standard amounts of MgO (0.06-percent by weight) provided alone in vendor materials such as by PECHINEY® LSB 172 do not provide enough inhibition to limit grain growth to less than 6-microns. It was found that by adding small amounts (range of 0.03 to 0.05 weight percent) of MgO as Mg(OH)2 particles, and further combining with low percentages of nano-YTZP the average Al2O3 grain size can be kept less than 6-microns (specifically a D50 diameter of between 4.8 and 6.0-microns for the ceramic produced in EXAMPLES 1-3) during high-temperature processing and improve the material's strength. This new sintered composition of ZTA comprises 0.5 to 2.5 weight percent ZrO2 in the form of crystalline grains that are stabilized in a substantially tetragonal crystal structure, 0.03 to 0.10 weight percent MgO in the form of crystalline grains, and the remainder of the ceramic being substantially α-Al2O3. The ceramic has an actual density of less than 4.0 g/cc. The ceramic has an average α-Al2O3 grain size less than 6-microns and strength greater than 50 kpsi.


α-Al2O3 crystalline particles used in the preparation of the examples described below were PECHINEY® powders, specifically, PECHINEY® P172 SB03 that has no MgO and a D50 particle size of 2.2-microns and PECHINEY® P172 LSB that has 0.06 weight percent MgO and a D50 particle size of 0.50-microns. YTZP with a particle size of less than 0.1-microns (nanoparticle size) were used. These YTZP powders were purchased from ABSCO® and MEL® of England. The MgO added to control the grain growth was in the fully hydrated form as Mg(OH)2. The fully hydrated MgO was prepared by milling MgO in dionized water at a concentration of 60-percent solids. The yield from the solids becomes 69-percent MgO on sintering. The slurry particle size was 0.5-1.0 microns, which upon calcination becomes less than 0.1-microns. Having the MgO fully hydrated provides for better composition control with yields of MgO that are more accurate. One or more organic binders in combination with water and a dispersant (ammonium polyacrylate by RT VANDERBUILT®) were mixed with all particles to form a slurry. The organic binders act as a binding agent that holds the mixture of particles together. During sintering, the organic binders burn off, leaving the shape of the body intact. Some examples of organic binders that may be used to form green compact include polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). Other binders include, but are not limited to, acrylic binders, gum and waxes.


General preparation of the new lightweight ZTA formulation is as follows. Measured amounts of α-Al2O3 powder, YTZP powder, Mg(OH)2 as a slurry, organic binders, dispersants and water are mixed together in a premix tank and then passed through a bead mill. After bead milling, the D50 of all particles in the slurry is milled to less than 1-micron. The resulting slurry is spray dried into granulated powder and then pressed into a green compact of a given shape. The green compact is heated to 3500° C. to 6000° C. as part of a binder burn out cycle. The green compact is then further heated to a sintering temperature of 1637° C. to 1660° C. for 4-hours. Shrinkage of approximately 18-22 percent is obtained after sintering. The composition ranges of the final lightweight, high-strength ZTA materials are listed in TABLE 1. Modulus of rupture was tested using an INSTRON® three point bend fixture.









TABLE 1







Lightweight, High-Strength


ZTA-Final Composition Range










Material
Percent by weight







α-Al2O3
97.5-99.5



ZrO2 (stabilized)
0.5-2.5



MgO
0.03-0.10










Examples of the aforementioned embodiments are described in these non-limitative following examples.









TABLE 2







Lightweight ZTA Formulations with MgO added as


Mg(OH)2 particles









Material
Weight
Manufacturer





P172 SB03 (without MgO)
117.54 g
PECHINEY ®


Nano-YTZP
0.0 g-2.4 g*
ABSCO ®


Mg(OH2) (as slurry)
0.086 g-0.144 g*



Dispersant
1.5 g
RT VANDERBILT ®


Organic Binder I
7.06 g



Organic Binder II
3.3 g



Water
39.6 g





*Defines range for EXAMPLES 1-5.






Example 1

A mixture of alumina powder with no vendor added MgO, 0.05-weight percent added MgO (added as 0.12% Mg(OH)2 slurry), and 2.0-weight percent nano-YTZP was prepared according to the formulation in TABLE 2. P172 SB03 and Mg(OH)2 were added first followed by nanoparticle YTZP to the water, binder and a dispersant. The slurry was premixed for 30-minutes and then passed through the bead mill once. The slurry was spray dried with the binder at 550-600 psi. The parts were pressed and sintered at 1637° C. to 1660° C. with a binder burnout cycle between 350° C.-600° C. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 55 kpsi. Actual density of the sintered ceramic was 3.94 g/cc. Grain size was D50 4.8-microns.


Example 2

Sample preparation was the same as EXAMPLE 2 above; however, 0.03-weight percent MgO was added as Mg(OH)2 slurry. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 53 kpsi. Grain size was D50 5.4-microns.


Example 3

Sample preparation was the same as EXAMPLE 2 above; however, 1.0-weight percent nano-YTZP was added. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 48 kpsi. Grain size was D50 5.8-microns.


Example 4

Sample preparation was the same as EXAMPLE 2 above; however, no MgO was added. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 43 kpsi. Grain size was D50 6.1-microns.


Example 5

Sample preparation was the same as EXAMPLE 2 above; however, no nano-YTZP was added. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 44 kpsi. Grain size was D50 12.0-microns.









TABLE 3







Lightweight ZTA Formulations with Vendor


Built-in MgO in Alumina Powder









Material
Weight
Manufacturer





P172 LSB (0.06% MgO)
117.54 g
PECHINEY ®


Nano-YTZP
0.0 g-2.4 g*
ABSCOO ®


Dispersant
1.5 g
RT VANDERBILT ®


Organic Binder I
7.06 g



Organic Binder II
3.3 g



Water
39.6 g





*Defines range for EXAMPLES 6 and 7.






Example 6

A mixture of alumina powder with only the MgO added by the vendor and 2.0-weight percent nano-YTZP, but with no additional Mg(OH)2, was prepared according to the formulation in TABLE 3. P172 LSB was added first followed by nano-YTZP to the water, binder and a dispersant. The slurry was premix for 30-minutes and then passed through the bead mill once. The slurry was spray dried with the binder at 550-600 psi. The parts were pressed and sintered at 1637° C. to 1660° C. with a binder burnout cycle between 350° C.-600° C. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 44 kpsi. Actual density of the sintered ceramic was 3.94 g/cc. Average grain size was 7.7-microns.


Example 7

Sample preparation was the same as EXAMPLE 6 above; however, no nano-YTZP was added. A 3-point bend test showed strength of 44 kpsi. Actual density of the sintered ceramic was 3.90 g/cc. Grain size was 15-microns.


TABLE 4 compares the relative strengths, grain size and compositions of the aforementioned examples. EXAMPLES 5 and 7 are the base line where no nano-YTZP was added. EXAMPLE 5 had 0.05-weight percent MgO added as Mg(OH)2. EXAMPLE 7 had built in MgO by the supplier. The modulus of rupture of both examples resulted in normal values one would expect for pure alumina composition. EXAMPLES 4 and 6 are the baseline where 2-weight percent nano-YTZP was added. EXAMPLE 4 had no MgO added. EXAMPLE 6 uses the P172 LSB that has built in MgO by the supplier. The addition of the nano-YTZP in the amount of 2-weight percent by itself, or in conjunction with the built in MgO by the supplier, does not effectively control the grain size and the strength is also similar to normal values one would expect from pure alumina. EXAMPLES 1-3 use both the addition of nano-YTZP and nano-MgO (supplied as Mg(OH)2) to the plain alpha alumina powder. EXAMPLES 1-3 show significant improvement in the strength of the ceramic and control of the grain size to less than 6-microns. Hence, adding nano-MgO as initial Mg(OH)2, homogenizing the particles to a dispersion of D50 less than 1-micron and then sintering makes a big difference in strength. Comparing EXAMPLES 1 and 3, one sees that as more nano-YTZP is added the strength goes up. However, to keep the material light weight, under 4.0 g/cc, it is necessary to keep the percent of nano-YTZP low, preferably below 2.5-weight percent and more preferably below 2.0-weight percent. When the percentage of nano-YTZP is lower than 1.0-weight percent, the strength of the material starts to drop below 50 kpsi and defines a lower limit for the percentage of nano-YTZP used. Comparing EXAMPLES 2 and 4, one sees as the amount of MgO, added as Mg(OH)2, drops from 0.03-weight percent to zero weight percent the strength also drops below 50 kspi and defines a lower limit for the percentage of MgO. If the MgO content is above the solid solubility limit of MgO in Al2O3, the material will react to form spinel (MgAl2O4), which may be detrimental to mechanical properties of the material. Therefore the upper limit of MgO should be below approximately 0.10-weight percent MgO and preferably below 0.05-weight percent.









TABLE 4







Material Properties Summary vs. Composition












Strength
D50 Grain




Example
(kpsi)
Size (μm)
YTZP %
MGO %














EXAMPLE 1
55
4.8
2.0
0.05 added as Mg(OH)2


EXAMPLE 2
53
5.4
2.0
0.03 added as Mg(OH)2


EXAMPLE 3
48
5.8
1.0
0.05 added as Mg(OH)2


EXAMPLE 4
43
6.1
2.0
None


EXAMPLE 5
44
12.0
None
0.05 added as Mg(OH)2


EXAMPLE 6
44
7.7
2.0
0.06 built-in by vendor


EXAMPLE 7
44
15
None
0.06 built-in by vendor









While several embodiments of the invention, together with modifications thereof, have been described in detail herein and illustrated by the accompanying examples, it will be evident that various compositions and further modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the invention. Nothing in the above specification is intended to limit the invention more narrowly than the appended claims. The examples given are intended only to be illustrative rather than exclusive.

Claims
  • 1. A ceramic, comprising: a) 0.5 to 2.5 weight percent ZrO2 in the form of crystalline grains and stabilized in a substantially tetragonal crystal structure;b) 0.03 to 0.10 weight percent MgO in the form of crystalline grains; andc) the remainder of the ceramic being substantially α-Al2O3.
  • 2. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said weight percent ZrO2 is from 1.0 to 2.0.
  • 3. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said weight percent MgO is from 0.03 to 0.05.
  • 4. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said ceramic has an actual density of less than 4.0 g/cc.
  • 5. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said α-Al2O3 is in the form of crystalline grains having a diameter less than 6-microns.
  • 6. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein the ceramic has strength greater than 50 kpsi.
  • 7. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein the ceramic has strength greater than 55 kpsi.
  • 8. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said ZrO2 is stabilized with Y2O3 to from YZTP, wherein said YTZP is in the form of crystalline grains having a diameter of less than 0.1-microns.
  • 9. A ceramic as recited in claim 1, wherein said tetragonal crystal structure of Zr02 is stabilized with a stabilizing agent that is at least one selected from the group consisting of Y2O3 and CeO2.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/675,747, filed Jul. 25, 2012 entitled “Addition of Magnesium Oxide to Zirconia Toughened Alumina”, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (25)
Number Name Date Kind
4218253 Dworak et al. Aug 1980 A
4298385 Claussen et al. Nov 1981 A
4316964 Lange Feb 1982 A
4331048 Dworak et al. May 1982 A
4501818 Rossi Feb 1985 A
4532224 Hori Jul 1985 A
4751207 Manniing Jun 1988 A
4772576 Kimura et al. Sep 1988 A
4820667 Tsunekawa et al. Apr 1989 A
4900701 Morishita et al. Feb 1990 A
4952536 Block Aug 1990 A
5032555 Yanmanis et al. Jul 1991 A
5045402 Adams, Jr. et al. Sep 1991 A
5130210 Iwasaki et al. Jul 1992 A
RE34028 Manning Aug 1992 E
5155071 Jacobson Oct 1992 A
5312789 Wood May 1994 A
5419827 Nanataki et al. May 1995 A
5432133 Matsuo Jul 1995 A
6624106 Cohen Sep 2003 B2
6800158 Polikarpus et al. Oct 2004 B2
7012036 Nawa et al. Mar 2006 B2
7148167 Shikata et al. Dec 2006 B2
8012897 Cohen Sep 2011 B2
20060063661 Cohen Mar 2006 A1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61675747 Jul 2012 US