Additive coated particles for low cost high performance materials

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11214658
  • Patent Number
    11,214,658
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 26, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 4, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Existing methods of extrusion and other techniques to compound host and additives material uniformly disperse the additive in the host. This innovation uses ball milling to a coat a host particle with an additive dramatically reducing the additive required to achieve a percolative network in the host.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with additives.


Carbon black when used as an additive has been shown to enhance mechanical, chemical, thermal, gas barrier, electrical, flame retardant and other properties of a host. Improvement in the physicochemical properties of the host depends on: 1) a uniform distribution and entrainment of the carbon black, 2) optimizing the interfacial bonding between the carbon black and host's matrix, 3) removal of gasses entrained in the host during processing, 4) optimizing the additive's innate properties, e.g. functionalization of the surface 5) optimizing the loading of the additive in the host.


Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with composite materials. Carbon black is a common additive used to enhance strength, electrical and thermal conductivity of a host. Because of the abundance of low cost carbon black, it has driven the electrical, thermal and mechanical benchmark specifications for carbon-filled composites.


The traditional method of compounding carbon black in a host is to melt-mix in an extruder. The extruded composite is then cut into pellets. These pellets are in general <5 mm long by <4 mm wide by <1 mm thick. These pellets can be further used for injection molding, powder coating or as a masterbatch. A masterbatch is a solid or liquid additive used to impart coloring or other properties to the host. A masterbatch is a concentrated mixture of additives encapsulated during a heating or extruding process into a host resin, which is then cooled and cut into a pellet and then ground/machined into a granular shape. Masterbatching is an economical method to store and then deliver an additive to a host during the manufacturing process.


The masterbatch preparation process yields a compounded composite that has a resistivity of ˜100 kΩ*cm to 200 kΩ*cm at an ultimate carbon black loading of ˜3% to 4% by mass relative to the host resin as a powder coated film. The masterbatching processing technique is designed to produce a cost effective material for storage and compounding and not for optimizing the additive's performance in a host. This dispersion/compounding process uniformly distributes the carbon black throughout the volume of the host artificially increasing the loading necessary to achieve a percolation threshold or an adequate electrical conductivity for a given application. Alternatively, non-random distributions of carbon filler in a polymer matrix are ideal for many applications as exemplified by unidirectional or woven carbon fiber composites.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The increasing cost of raw materials in the world has generated a demand to optimize material utilization in almost every process. The growing demand of the electronics and RF markets for both EMI shielding and ESD protection has and is placing a large demand on specialized carbon black, functionalized for high conductivity. The traditional dispersion/compounding entrains the carbon black uniformly through the volume of the masterbatch pellet or powder particle.


The method herein enables the dispersion/compounding of carbon black or any additive to a host in a manner that optimizes performance while minimizing the mass of the additive used in the application. The particles of the host material are coated with the filler additive using a milling process. These particles may be hot-pressed, stamped, extruded, injected molded or used in a powder coating. The coated surface makes connective pathways through the volume of the final composite structure. The connective structures form a unique pattern within the volume of composite structure with extensive well-connected percolating networks of carbon black surrounding vacuoles of the host material where there is no carbon black entrained in the vacuoles.


In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method of making an additive coated host particle for making a composite material for enhancing the material property, comprising: providing a powdered host; providing a powdered additive with a softening or melting temperature higher than the melting point of said powdered host; inputting said powdered host and said powdered additive to a ball mill; and milling said powdered host and said powdered additive for a milling time to sufficient mix but not melt the host particle. In one aspect, the method further comprises the step of dry blending a neat polymer powder to enhance flowability and processability of powder. In another aspect, the host is a powder from a resin. In another aspect, the host is a powder from a metal. In another aspect, the host is a powder from a ceramic. In another aspect, the additive is a powder to alter the physical properties including thermal, electrical, optical or mechanical. In another aspect, the additive is carbon black. In another aspect, the milling is in a ball mill, and wherein the ball mill uses stainless steel balls weighing at least 1 g each. In another aspect, the milling is in a closed chamber for 10 to 100 minutes at 1,000 RPM or less. In another aspect, the milling is a sand, bead, and horizontal mill at an rpm of 100-1000. In another aspect, the milling is in attrition mill directly agitates the media to achieve grinding. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is the same polymer as the attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is a different polymer than attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is non flowable (such as PTFE) and a dilution powder is PVDF.


In another embodiment, the present invention includes a method of coating a host particle for making a composite material with enhanced material properties, comprising: providing a powdered host; providing a powdered additive with a softening or melting temperature higher than the melting point of said powdered host; inputting said powdered host and said powdered additive to a mill; and coating said powdered host with said powdered additive in a mill for a milling time to sufficient mix but not melt the host particle, wherein the coating dramatically reduces the additive required to achieve a percolative network in the host. In one aspect, the host is a resin powder. In one aspect, the host is a metal powder. In one aspect, the host is a ceramic powder. In one aspect, the additive is a powder selected to alter at least one physical properties selected from thermal, electrical, optical, or mechanical. In one aspect, the additive is carbon black. In one aspect, the milling is in a ball mill, and wherein the ball mill uses stainless steel balls weighing at least 1 g each. In one aspect, the milling is in a closed chamber for 10 to 100 minutes at 1,000 RPM or less. In one aspect, the milling is a sand, bead, and horizontal mill at an rpm of 100-1000. In one aspect, the mill is an attrition mill directly agitates the media to achieve grinding. In one aspect, the method further comprises the step of dry blending a neat polymer powder to enhance flowability and processability of powder. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is the same polymer as the attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is a different polymer than attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is non flowable (such as PTFE) and a dilution powder is PVDF.


In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method of making an additive coated host particle for making a composite material for enhancing the material property, comprising: providing a powdered host; providing a powdered additive with a softening or melting temperature higher than the melting point of said powdered host; inputting said powdered host and said powdered additive to a ball mill; milling said powdered host and said powdered additive for a milling time to sufficient mix but not melt the host particle; and dry blending a neat polymer powder to enhance flowability and processability of powder. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is the same polymer as the attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is a different polymer than attrition milled polymer. In another aspect, the dry neat polymer powder is non flowable (such as PTFE) and a dilution powder is PVDF.







DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the invention.


To facilitate the understanding of this invention, a number of terms are defined below. Terms defined herein have meanings as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the areas relevant to the present invention. Terms such as “a”, “an” and “the” are not intended to refer to only a singular entity, but include the general class of which a specific example may be used for illustration. The terminology herein is used to describe specific embodiments of the invention, but their usage does not delimit the invention, except as outlined in the claims.


Non-limiting examples of a “host” or “host material”, which terms are used interchangeably, for use with the present invention include, e.g., metals, ceramics, resins, ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), Polycarbonate (PC), ceramic powders, ceramic powder is aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, silica, silicon dioxide, or combination thereof, metal powders, metal powders of titanium, titanium hydride, tantalum, cobalt chrome, niobium, stainless steel, nickel, copper, aluminum, or combinations thereof, a polycrystalline material, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyurethane, poly(butyleneterephthalate), nylon 11, poly(ethyleneterephthalate), poly(ether ether ketone), poly(phenylene sulfide), polyolefin, an oxide, carbonate or silicate of an element of Groups 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b of the Periodic Table, poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly(methylmethacrylate), polystyrene, polycarbonate/nylon alloy, polycarbonate/polyester alloy, ABS, ABS/nylon alloy, ABS/PVC alloy, acrylic copolymers, polysulfone, polysulfone/ABS alloy, polyetherimides, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, fluoropolymers, polyphenylene oxide/polystyrene blend, or poly(phenylene sulfide).


Carbon black and host particles can be subjected to mechanochemical processing in what is generically referred to as a “ball mill.” When grinding in the ball mill, the balls (media) in their random movement are rolling against each other and the container, exerting shearing forces on the carbon black and the particles from the host. The resulting host particles can be coated on the exterior and have not been melted nor has the host particle's size been reduced by more than 20% due to the milling process.


Due to the cost differential between crystalline graphite and carbon black, the latter has been widely adopted as an additive. Other forms of carbon powder may be used with carbon black, or as an alternative to carbon black.


A useful and simple equation describing the grinding momentum is m×v (mass×velocity), which enables the user to see how the attrition mill fits into the family of mills. For example, a 2-liter ball mill uses 6 lbs (or ˜2600 stainless steel balls) of 0.25″ diameter stainless steel balls weighing 1 g each. Milling or mixing can be accomplished in a closed chamber for 10 to 100 minutes at 1,000 RPM or less to coat the host particles. The other mills, such as sand, bead, and horizontal, use smaller media from 0.3 mm to 2 mm, but run at a very high rpm (roughly 100-1000). High-speed dispersers with no media run at an even faster rpm (1000-4000). An attrition mill directly agitates the media to achieve grinding.


For efficient fine grinding, both impact action and shearing force are generally required. The grinding media's random movement and spinning at different rotational energies exert shearing forces and impact forces on the carbon black and host particles. The milling/mixing time may range from 5 to 60 minutes. The combination of milling/mixing speed, media size and milling/mixing time enables the production of a host particle covered with an additive. This additive encased host particle improves the efficacy of the use of an additive. This milling/mixing process and resulting additive covered host particle in the case of carbon black can reduced the resistivity of the composite material by as much as 2,000 times for the same loading, opening new applications or reducing the loading requirement for current applications. The GO/Polymer masterbatch is dry mixed in an in-bin tumble mill with a neat polymer powder to reduce the concentration by half or to an arbitrary dilution. The dry neat powder can be a polymer other than the original powder to enhance flowability and processability and when combined with GO/Polymer result is a highly electrically high strength conductive composite.


Depending on the mechanical properties of the polymer the milling process may damage the polymer. This damage translates to poor physical properties in the compression molded or extruded polymer parts, as well as reducing the flowability of the compounded GO/Polymer masterbatch powder. To address this issue one makes a higher loading of GO/polymer master batch as an example to achieve a 5% loading of GO in a polymer one produces a 10% loading of the GO in the polymer using the milling process as described above. The 10% GO/polymer powder is then dry mixing with the neat polymer powder to reduce the concentration by half. The dry powder can be blended in an in-bin tumble mill or other blending process that does not damage the additional neat polymer. Additionally the dry neat powder can be a polymer other than the original powder to enhance flowability and processability. As an example Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVF), or polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) is extrudable polymer while Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a polymer that does not flow and is generally compression molded into a block and them machined into the final product. GO can be ball milled with PVDF and the dry mixed with PTFE to produce an extrudable composite polymer.


As long as the PTFE is at least 20% of the blend powder then the resulting composite will have the physical properties of bulk PTFE. When combined with GO the result is a highly electrically conductive composite.


It is contemplated that any embodiment discussed in this specification can be implemented with respect to any method, kit, reagent, or composition of the invention, and vice versa. Furthermore, compositions of the invention can be used to achieve methods of the invention.


It will be understood that particular embodiments described herein are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principal features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the claims.


All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.” The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error for the device, the method being employed to determine the value, or the variation that exists among the study subjects.


As used in this specification and claim(s), the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. In embodiments of any of the compositions and methods provided herein, “comprising” may be replaced with “consisting essentially of” or “consisting of”. As used herein, the phrase “consisting essentially of” requires the specified integer(s) or steps as well as those that do not materially affect the character or function of the claimed invention. As used herein, the term “consisting” is used to indicate the presence of the recited integer (e.g., a feature, an element, a characteristic, a property, a method/process step or a limitation) or group of integers (e.g., feature(s), element(s), characteristic(s), propertie(s), method/process steps or limitation(s)) only.


The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.


As used herein, words of approximation such as, without limitation, “about”, “substantial” or “substantially” refers to a condition that when so modified is understood to not necessarily be absolute or perfect but would be considered close enough to those of ordinary skill in the art to warrant designating the condition as being present. The extent to which the description may vary will depend on how great a change can be instituted and still have one of ordinary skilled in the art recognize the modified feature as still having the required characteristics and capabilities of the unmodified feature. In general, but subject to the preceding discussion, a numerical value herein that is modified by a word of approximation such as “about” may vary from the stated value by at least ±1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 or 15%.


All of the compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making an additive-coated host particle for making a composite material, comprising: providing a powdered host;providing graphene oxide as a powdered additive with a softening or melting temperature higher than a melting point of the powdered host;inputting the powdered host and the graphene oxide to a ball mill;milling the powdered host and the graphene oxide for a milling time to sufficiently mix the powdered host and the graphene oxide but not melt the host particle to coat the powdered host with the graphene oxide; andlowering a viscosity of the powdered host coated with the graphene oxide by dry blending a neat polymer powder with the powdered host coated with the graphene oxide.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered host comprises a resin powder.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered host is a powder from a metal.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered host is a powder from a ceramic.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered additive is a powder to alter physical properties of the powdered host, including thermal, electrical, optical or mechanical properties.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the milling is in a ball mill, and wherein the ball mill uses stainless steel balls weighing at least 1 g each.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the milling is in a closed chamber for 10 to 100 minutes at 1,000 RPM or less.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the milling is in a sand, bead, and horizontal mill at an rpm of 100-1000.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the milling is in an attrition mill that directly agitates media to achieve grinding.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered host is a polymer, and wherein the neat polymer powder is the same polymer as the powdered host.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered host is a polymer, and wherein the neat polymer powder is a different polymer than the powdered host.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the neat polymer powder is non-flowable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and the powdered host is polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF).
  • 13. A method of coating a host particle for making a composite material, comprising: providing a powdered host;providing graphene oxide as a powdered additive with a softening or melting temperature higher than a melting point of the powdered host;inputting the powdered host and the graphene oxide into a mill to coat the powdered host with the graphene oxide;coating the powdered host with the graphene oxide in the mill for a milling time to sufficiently mix but not melt the host particle, wherein the coating reduces the graphene oxide required to achieve a percolative network in the host; andlowering a viscosity of the powdered host coated with the graphene oxide by dry blending a neat polymer powder with the powdered host coated with the graphene oxide.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the powdered host comprises a resin powder.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the powdered host is a metal powder.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the powdered host is a ceramic powder.
  • 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the powdered additive is selected to alter at least one physical property of the powdered host selected from thermal, electrical, optical, or mechanical properties.
  • 18. The method of claim 13, wherein the mill is a ball mill, and wherein the ball mill uses stainless steel balls weighing at least 1 g each.
  • 19. The method of claim 13, wherein the milling is in a closed chamber for 10 to 100 minutes at 1,000 RPM or less.
  • 20. The method of claim 13, wherein the coating is in a sand, bead, and horizontal mill at an rpm of 100-1000.
  • 21. The method of claim 13, wherein the mill is an attrition mill that directly agitates media to achieve grinding.
  • 22. The method of claim 13, wherein the powdered host is a polymer, and wherein the neat polymer powder is the same polymer as the powdered host.
  • 23. The method of claim 13, wherein the powdered host is a polymer, and wherein the neat polymer powder is a different polymer than the powdered host.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the neat polymer powder is non-flowable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and the powdered host is polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF).
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2017/058512, filed on Oct. 26, 2017 claiming the priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/413,072 filed on Oct. 26, 2016, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2017/058512 10/26/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/081413 5/3/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (108)
Number Name Date Kind
2459520 Greenshields Jan 1949 A
5057370 Krieg Oct 1991 A
5360582 Boyd et al. Nov 1994 A
5501934 Sukata et al. Mar 1996 A
5506061 Kindl et al. Apr 1996 A
5509993 Hirschvogel Apr 1996 A
5583176 Haberle Dec 1996 A
5883176 Gerroir et al. Mar 1999 A
6004712 Barbetta et al. Dec 1999 A
6172163 Rein et al. Jan 2001 B1
6348279 Saito et al. Feb 2002 B1
6436567 Saito et al. Aug 2002 B1
7005205 Gyoten et al. Feb 2006 B1
7231084 Tang et al. Jun 2007 B2
7329698 Noguchi et al. Feb 2008 B2
7623340 Song et al. Nov 2009 B1
8168964 Hiura et al. May 2012 B2
8216541 Jang et al. Jul 2012 B2
8580132 Lin et al. Nov 2013 B2
9758379 Blair Sep 2017 B2
9802206 Kitaura et al. Oct 2017 B2
10138969 Hattori et al. Nov 2018 B2
10287167 Blair May 2019 B2
20020008031 Barsukov et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020119358 Rock Aug 2002 A1
20020182387 Mercuri et al. Dec 2002 A1
20040000735 Gilbert, Sr. et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040033189 Kaschak et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040209150 Rock et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050041373 Pruss Feb 2005 A1
20050191471 Haggquist Sep 2005 A1
20050196636 Kawakami et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050208319 Finley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20070219336 Ito Sep 2007 A1
20070284557 Gruner et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080048152 Jang et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080206124 Jang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080279710 Zhamu et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080318110 Budinski et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090017211 Cruner et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090092747 Zhamu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090140801 Ozyilmaz et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090215953 Hwang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090224420 Wilkinson Sep 2009 A1
20090241496 Pintault et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100006445 Tomatschger Jan 2010 A1
20100028681 Dai et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055458 Jang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100056819 Jang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092809 Drzal et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100143732 Swift et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100147188 Mamak et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100151318 Lopatin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100209731 Humano Aug 2010 A1
20100239870 Bowen Sep 2010 A1
20100317790 Jang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017585 Zhamo et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110041980 Kim et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110049437 Crain et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110088931 Lettow et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110120347 Chung et al. May 2011 A1
20110143018 Peng et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110143107 Steinig-Nowakowski Jun 2011 A1
20110159372 Zhamu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110223405 Compton et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110256376 Compton et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110267673 Agrawal et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110274610 Paquette et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281034 Lee et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120025420 Utashiro et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120055612 Ahmed et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120077017 Buresch Mar 2012 A1
20120107562 Bolotin et al. May 2012 A1
20120129736 Tour et al. May 2012 A1
20120184065 Gharib et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120220198 Peukert et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120228555 Cheng et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120282419 Ahn et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298396 Hong et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120298620 Jiang et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130015409 Fugetsu Jan 2013 A1
20130018204 Jeon et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130114367 Heusinger et al. May 2013 A1
20130156678 Banerjee et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130217222 Johnson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130236715 Zhamu et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130240033 Jeon et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130264041 Zhamu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130272950 Yun et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130330833 Ruiz et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140018480 Lee et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140030590 Wang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140117745 Wilke et al. May 2014 A1
20140134092 Shankman May 2014 A1
20140143018 Nies et al. May 2014 A1
20140204384 Lee et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140227211 Shankman Aug 2014 A1
20140272199 Lin et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140299475 Bullington et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150266739 Zhamu et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150284253 Zhamu et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150368436 Chiu et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160016803 Stoltz et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160144339 Kim et al. May 2016 A1
20160216629 Grinwald Jul 2016 A1
20170166722 Zhamu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170233290 Christiansen et al. Aug 2017 A1
20190051903 Manabe et al. Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
101462889 Jun 2009 CN
102021633 Apr 2011 CN
102586952 Jul 2012 CN
102719719 Jul 2012 CN
103058541 Apr 2013 CN
103130436 Jun 2013 CN
103215693 Jul 2013 CN
103408880 Nov 2013 CN
103545536 Jan 2014 CN
103757823 Apr 2014 CN
103819915 May 2014 CN
103962102 Aug 2014 CN
104319372 Jan 2015 CN
104446176 Mar 2015 CN
104844930 Apr 2015 CN
106700356 May 2017 CN
108276576 Jul 2018 CN
0949704 Oct 1999 EP
1227531 Jul 2002 EP
2560228 Feb 2013 EP
723598 Feb 1955 GB
S6169853 Apr 1986 JP
64009808 Jan 1989 JP
2012007224 Jan 2012 JP
2012136567 Jul 2012 JP
20110119429 Nov 2011 KR
20130048741 Apr 2013 KR
20130090979 Aug 2013 KR
1020150026092 Mar 2015 KR
2456361 Jul 2012 RU
2009032069 Mar 2009 WO
2009059193 May 2009 WO
2010089326 Aug 2010 WO
2010091352 Aug 2010 WO
2011014242 Feb 2011 WO
2011074125 Jun 2011 WO
2011078639 Jun 2011 WO
2011086391 Jul 2011 WO
2011087301 Jul 2011 WO
2011099761 Aug 2011 WO
2011162727 Dec 2011 WO
2012058553 May 2012 WO
2012148880 Nov 2012 WO
2012177864 Dec 2012 WO
2013001266 Jan 2013 WO
2013096990 Jul 2013 WO
2014062226 Apr 2014 WO
2014080144 May 2014 WO
2014104446 Jul 2014 WO
2014138587 Sep 2014 WO
WO-2014138587 Sep 2014 WO
2014210584 Dec 2014 WO
2015065893 May 2015 WO
2016040612 Mar 2016 WO
2016123080 Aug 2016 WO
2016154057 Sep 2016 WO
2016200469 Dec 2016 WO
2017053204 Mar 2017 WO
2018008143 May 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (77)
Entry
Chemical Book, <<https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB8295389.htm>> (Year: 2017).
Chemical Book, <<https://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemical PropertiesCB8123794_EN.htm>> (Year: 2017).
Extended European Search Report for EP 16849382.3 dated Apr. 30, 2019, 10 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 17865997.5 dated Jul. 22, 2019, 7 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/051405 from KIPO dated Jan. 3, 2020, 11 pp.
Rahman, M.A., et al., “The effect of residence time on the physical characterists of PAN-based fibers produced using a solvent-free coagulation process,” Materials Science and Engineering A 448, 2007, pp. 275-280.
Wang, Q., et al., “Nanostructures and Surface Nanomechanical Properties of Polyacrylonitrile/Graphene Oxide Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013.
Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology (“Flake”, p. 1, obtained online Aug. 19, 2016).
Bourlinos, A.B., et al., “Graphite Oxide: Chemical Reduction to Graphite and Surface Modification with Primary Aliphatic Amines and Amino Acids,” Langmuir 2003, vol. 19, pp. 6050-6055.
Ebinezar, et al., “Analysis of hardness test for aluminum carbon nanotube metal matrix and graphene,” Indian Journal of Engineering, vol. 10, No. 21, 2014, pp. 33-39.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 12844344.7 dated Oct. 22, 2015, 8 pp.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 14759787.6 dated Oct. 6, 2016, 13 pp.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 14760912.7 dated May 11, 2016, 8 pp.
Fang, M., et al., ““Covalent polymer functionalization of graphenenanosheets and mechanical properties of composites”” Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2009, vol. 19, No. 38, pp. 7098-7105.
Feng, H., et al., “A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide,” Nature Communications, Feb. 26, 2013, 8 pp.
FMC, Persulfates Technical Information, (http://ww.peroxychem.com/media/90826/aod_brochure_persulfate.pdf, downloaded on Jan. 19, 2017) 16 pp.
Herman, A., et al., “Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: a review.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 1297-1302.
Hwang, T., et al., “One-step metal electroplating and patterning on a plastic substrate using an electrically-conductive layer of few-layer graphene,” Carbon, Sep. 17, 2011, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 612-621.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/061457 from KIPO dated Mar. 15, 2013, 10 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/021765 from KIPO dated Jul. 24, 2014, 11 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/021810 from KIPO dated Jul. 14, 2014, 10 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/062371 from KIPO dated Feb. 11, 2015, 12 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/045657 from KIPO dated Oct. 27, 2015, 6 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/049398 from KIPO dated Dec. 16, 2015, 13 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/014873 from KIPO dated May 13, 2016, 15 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/022229 from KIPO dated Jun. 27, 2016, 15 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/023273 from KIPO dated Jul. 12, 2016.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/023435 from KIPO dated May 30, 2016, 13 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/025307 from KIPO dated Sep. 12, 2016, 11 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/025338 from KIPO dated Jul. 25, 2016, 12 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/052292 from KIPO dated Nov. 21, 2016, 14 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/027231 from KIPO dated Jul. 11, 2017, 18 pp.
Jeon, I., et al., “Edge-carboxylated graphene nanosheets via ball milling.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPNAS, Apr. 10, 2012, vol. 109, No. 15, pp. 5588-5593.
Liu, Y. B., et al., “Recent development in the fabrication of metal matrix-particulate composites using powder metallurgy techniques,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 29, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1999-2007.
McQuarrie (2011, General Chemistry (4th Edition). University Science Books, Appendix G “Standard Reduction Voltages for Aqueous Solutions at 25C, p. A-34 to A-37 and also p. 949, Table 25.3. Online version available at:http://app.knovel.com/hotlink!toc/id:kpGCE00013/general-chemistry-4th/general-chemistry-4th)”.
Merriam-Webster (“Definition of Flake” p. 1-9, obtained online Aug. 19, 2016).
Mohajerani, E., et al., “Morphological and thickness analysis for PMMA spin coated films,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 9:12, Dec. 2007, p. 3901-3906.
Moustafa, S.F., et al., “Copper matrix SiC and A1203 particulate composites by powder metallurgy technique,” Materials Letters, 2002, vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 244-249.
Ong, T. S., et al., “Effect of atmosphere on the mechanical milling of natural graphite,” Carbon, 2000, vol. 38, No. 15, pp. 2077-285.
Rafiee, M. et al., “Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites.” Small, 2010, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 179-183.
Steurer, P., et al., ““Functionalized graphenes and thermoplasticnanocomposites based upon expanded graphite oxide.”” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2009, vol. 30, Nos. 4-5, pp. 316-327.
Szabo, T., et al., “Evolution of Surface Functional Groups in a Series of Progressively Oxidized Graphite Oxides,” Chem. Mater., vol. 18, Mar. 29, 2006, pp. 2740-2749.
Taeseon, H., et al.,“One-step metal electroplating and patterning on a plastic substrate using an electrically conductive layer of few-layer graphene,” Carbon, Elsevier, Oxford, GB, vol. 50, No. 2, Sep. 8, 2011, pp. 612-621.
USP Technologies, “What is the pH of H2O2 solutions?,” http://www.h2o2.com/faqs/FaqDetail.aspx?fld=26, accessed Jan. 19, 2017, 2 pp.
Wang, X. et al., ““In situ polymerization of graphene nanosheets and polyurethane with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties.”” Journal of materials Chemistry, 2011, vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 4222-4227.
Wang, Y., et al., “Electrochemical Delamination of CVD-Grown Graphene Film: Toward the Recyclable Use of Copper Catalyst,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, No. 12, Oct. 30, 2011, pp. 9927-9933.
Wu, Z-S. et al., “Field Emission of Single-Layer Films Prepared by Electrophoretic Deposition.” Advanced Materials, 21, 2009, pp. 1756-1760.
Zhao, W., et al., “Preparation of graphene by exfoliation of graphite using wet ball milling.” Journal of Materials Chemistry, Jun. 3, 2010, vol. 20, pp. 5817-5819.
Extended European Search Report and Opinion for EPO 17185605.7 dated Nov. 29, 2017, 7 pp.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/058512 from KIPO dated Feb. 7, 2018, 14 pp.
Oh, Won-Chun, et al., “The Effect of Thermal and Ultrasonic Treatment on the Formation of Graphene-oxide Nanosheets,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 56, No. 4, Apr. 2010, pp. 1097-1102.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16765526.5 dated Feb. 13, 2018, 7 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16769452.0 dated Mar. 1, 2018, 9 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16780450.9 dated Apr. 19, 2018, 17 pp.
Jeon, I-Y., et al., “Large Scale Production of Edge-Selectively Functionalized Graphene Nanoplatelets via Ball Milling and Their Use as Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction,” J Am Chem Soc (2013), 135-1386-1393.
Li, Y., et al., “Hybridizing wood cellulose and graphene oxide toward high-performance fibers,” NPG Asia Materials, 7, Jan. 9, 2015, 14 pp.
Tissera, N., et al., “Hydrophobic cotton textile surfaces using an amphiphilic graphene oxide (GO) coating,” Applied Surface Science, 324, Nov. 4, 2014 (2015), pp. 455-463.
Kaur, S., et al., “Enhanced thermal transport at covalently functionalized carbon nanotube array interfaces,” Nature Communications, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1-8.
Maguire, J. A., et al., “Efficient low-temperature thermal functionalization of alkanes. Transfer dehydrogenation catalized by Rh(PMe3)2CI(CO) in solution under a high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere,” J. Am. Chern. Soc., Aug. 1, 1991, vol. 113:17, pp. 6706-6708.
Babak, F., et al., “Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Graphene Oxide: Cement Nanocomposites,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, ID 276323, 10 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 15834377.2 dated Mar. 9, 2018, 8 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 16780450.9 dated Jul. 13, 2018, 18 pp.
Wu, Q., et al., “Suprecapacitors Based on Flexible Graphene/Polyaniline Nanofiber Composite Films,” ACS Nano (2010), 4(4):1963-1970.
Xia, et al., “Effects of resin content and preparing conditions on the properties of polyphenylene sulfide resin/graphite composite for bipolar plate,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 178, Dec. 5, 2007, pp. 363-367.
Kirschner, M., “Ozone,” Ullmann's Enclyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, vol. 25, 2012, pp. 637-644.
Minus, M., et al., “The Processing, Properties, and Structure of Carbon Fibers,” JOM, Feb. 2005, pp. 52-58.
Pauling, L., General Chemistry, Chapter 15, “Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Electrolysis,” Dover Publications, Inc., 1970, 41 pp.
Polymers: A Properties Database, “Poly(ethylene terphthalate)”, Chemnetbase, downloaded from http://poly.chemnetbase.com, Jan. 24, 2016, 5 pp.
CN 102586952 Google translation 7 pp.
CN 103545536 Google translation 5 pp.
Gong, et al., “Optimization of the Reinforcement of Polymer-Based Nanocomposites with Graphene,” ECCM15-15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, Jun. 24-28, 2012.
Gulotty, R., et al., “Effects of Functionalization on Thermal Properties of Single-Wall and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotube—Polymer Nancomposites,” UC Riverside—Polytechnic of Turin (2013), 25 pp.
Porter, Roger S. et al., “Property Opportunities with Polyolefins, A Review Preparations and Applications of High Stiffness and Strength by Uniaxial Draw,” Polymer, 35:23, 1994, pp. 4979-4984.
Song, M., et al., “The Effect of Surface Functionalization on the Immobilization of Gold Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheets,” Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2012, Art. ID 329318, Mar. 28, 2012, 5 pp.
Extended European Search Report for EP 19862892.7 dated Oct. 12, 2021, 11 pp.
Osicka, et al., “Light-Induced and Sensing Capabilities of SI-ATRP Modified Graphene Oxide particles in Elastomeric Matrix,” Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems 2017, vol. 10164, 1016434, doi: 10.1117/12.2260703, 10.pp.
Wang, Y., et al., “Kevlar oligomer functionalized graphene for polymer composites,” Polymer, 52, Juen 15, 2011, 3661-3670.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190263977 A1 Aug 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62413072 Oct 2016 US