Additive for reducing spotting in automatic dishwashing systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10144906
  • Patent Number
    10,144,906
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 7, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 4, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
A phosphorus-free automatic dishwashing detergent composition comprising: (a) 0.5 to 8 wt % of a first polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 60 to 82 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, (ii) 10 to 30 wt % of a monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid and (iii) 8 to 25 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS); and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000; (b) 0.5 to 8 wt % of a second polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 60 to 95 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, (ii) 5 to 40 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS); and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000; (c) 15 to 50 wt % carbonate, (d) 5 to 50 wt % citrate and (e) 10 to 30 wt % of a bleaching agent.
Description
BACKGROUND

This invention relates generally to a detergent composition that reduces spotting in non-phosphate automatic dishwashing systems.


Automatic dishwashing detergents are generally recognized as a class of detergent compositions distinct from those used for fabric washing or water treatment. Automatic dishwashing detergents are required to produce a spotless and film-free appearance on washed items after a complete cleaning cycle. Phosphate-free compositions rely on non-phosphate builders, such as salts of citrate, carbonate, silicate, disilicate, bicarbonate, aminocarboxylates and others to sequester calcium and magnesium from hard water, and upon drying, leave an insoluble visible deposit. Polymers made from acrylic acid, maleic acid and 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS) are known for use in inhibiting the scale produced from non-phosphate builders. For example, U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0234264 discloses a polymer made from acrylic acid, maleic acid and AMPS in a detergent composition. However, this reference does not disclose the compositions of the present invention, which offer improved performance.


STATEMENT OF INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a phosphorus-free automatic dishwashing detergent composition comprising: (a) 0.5 to 8 wt % of a first polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 60 to 82 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, (ii) 10 to 30 wt % of a monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid and (iii) 8 to 25 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS); and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000; (b) 0.5 to 8 wt % of a second polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 60 to 95 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, (ii) 5 to 40 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS); and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000; (c) 15 to 50 wt % carbonate, (d) 5 to 50 wt % citrate and (e) 10 to 30 wt % of a bleaching agent.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

All percentages are weight percentages (wt %), and all temperatures are in ° C., unless otherwise indicated. Weight average molecular weights, Mw, are measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using polyacrylic acid standards, as is known in the art. The techniques of GPC are discussed in detail in Modern Size Exclusion Chromatography, W. W. Yau, J. J. Kirkland, D. D. Bly; Wiley-Interscience, 1979, and in A Guide to Materials Characterization and Chemical Analysis, J. P. Sibilia; VCH, 1988, p. 81-84. The molecular weights reported herein are in units of daltons. As used herein the term “(meth)acrylic” refers to acrylic or methacrylic; the term “carbonate” to alkali metal or ammonium salts of carbonate, bicarbonate, percarbonate, sesquicarbonate; the term “silicate” to alkali metal or ammonium salts of silicate, disilicate, metasilicate; and the term “citrate” to alkali metal citrates. Preferably, the carbonates, silicates or citrates are sodium, potassium or lithium salts; preferably sodium or potassium; preferably sodium. Weight percentages of carbonates or citrates are based on the actual weights of the salts, including metal ions. The term “phosphorus-free” refers to compositions containing less than 0.5 wt % phosphorus (as elemental phosphorus), preferably less than 0.2 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt %, preferably no detectable phosphorus. Weight percentages in the detergent composition are percentages of dry weight, i.e., excluding any water that may be present in the detergent composition. Percentages of monomer units in the polymer are percentages of solids weight, i.e., excluding any water present in a polymer emulsion.


Preferably, the amount of citrate in the detergent composition is at least 8 wt %, preferably at least 10 wt %, preferably at least 15 wt %, preferably at least 20 wt %, preferably at least 25 wt %; preferably no more than 45 wt %, preferably no more than 40 wt %, preferably no more than 35 wt %. Preferably, the amount of carbonate is at least 20 wt %, preferably at least 22 wt %; preferably no more than 45 wt %, preferably no more than 40 wt %, preferably no more than 35 wt %, preferably no more than 30 wt %. Preferably, the bleaching agent is percarbonate or perborate. Preferably, the amount of bleaching agent is at least 11 wt %, preferably at least 12 wt %, preferably at least 13 wt %; preferably no more than 25 wt %, preferably no more than 22 wt %, preferably no more than 20 wt %, preferably no more than 18 wt %.


Preferably, the detergent composition comprises an aminocarboxylate builder, preferably in an amount from 1 to 35 wt %; preferably at least 1.5 wt %, preferably at least 2 wt %, preferably at least 5 wt %, preferably at least 10 wt %; preferably no more than 30 wt %, preferably no more than 25 wt %, preferably no more than 20 wt %. A preferred aminocarboxylate builder is methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA).


Preferably the first and second polymers are present in a weight ratio (first:second) of 1:9 to 9:1, respectively; preferably 1:6 to 6:1, preferably 1:4 to 4:1, preferably 1:3 to 4:1, preferably 1:2 to 3.5:1. Preferably, the total amount of first and second polymers in the composition is from 1.5 to 12 wt %, preferably from 2 to 11 wt %, preferably from 2 to 10 wt %, preferably from 2.5 to 9 wt %. Preferably, the composition comprises at least 1 wt % of the first polymer, preferably at least 1.5 wt %, preferably at least 2 wt %, preferably at least 2.5 wt %, preferably at least 3 wt %; preferably no more than 7.5 wt %, preferably no more than 7 wt %, preferably no more than 6.5 wt %. Preferably, the composition comprises at least 0.7 wt % of the second polymer, preferably at least 0.9 wt %, preferably at least 1.2 wt %, preferably at least 1.5 wt %, preferably at least 1.8 wt %; preferably no more than 7 wt %, preferably no more than 6.5 wt %, preferably no more than 6 wt %.


Preferably, the first polymer comprises at least 63 wt % polymerized units of (meth)acrylic acid, preferably at least 65 wt %, preferably at least 67 wt %, preferably at least 68 wt %; preferably no more than 78 wt %, preferably no more than 76 wt %, preferably no more than 74 wt %. Preferably, the monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid units are at least 12 wt % of the first polymer, preferably at least 14 wt %, preferably at least 16 wt %, preferably at least 18 wt %; preferably no more than 28%, preferably no more than 26 wt %, preferably no more than 24 wt %.


For both the first and second polymers, in cases where the monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid is available in the form of an anhydride, the polymer is made by polymerizing the anhydride, which is hydrolyzed to the acid during the polymerization process, resulting in a polymerized unit of a monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid. All references to polymerized dicarboxylic acid units in the polymers include metal salts of the acid which would be present at pH values near or above the pKa of the carboxylic acid groups. Preferably, the monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid has from four to six carbon atoms, preferably four or five. Preferably, the monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid is selected from the group consisting of maleic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid and citraconic acid; preferably maleic acid.


Preferably, the amount of polymerized AMPS units (including metal or ammonium salts) in the first polymer is at least 8.5 wt %, preferably at least 9 wt %; preferably no more than 20 wt %, preferably no more than 17 wt %, preferably no more than 15 wt %, preferably no more than 13 wt %. Preferably, the total amount of monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid and AMPS units in the first polymer is at least 24 wt %, preferably at least 26 wt %, preferably at least 28 wt %, preferably at least 29 wt %, preferably at least 30 wt %.


Preferably, the second polymer comprises polymerized units which are at least 65 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, preferably at least 70 wt %, preferably at least 75 wt %, preferably at least 80 wt %, preferably at least 85 wt %; preferably no more than 94 wt %, preferably no more than 93 wt %, preferably no more than 92 wt %. Preferably, the amount of AMPS residues (including metal or ammonium salts) in the second polymer is at least 6 wt %, preferably at least 7 wt %, preferably at least 8 wt %; preferably no more than 35 wt %, preferably no more than 30 wt %, preferably no more than 25 wt %, preferably no more than 20 wt %, preferably no more than 15 wt %.


Preferably, neither polymer contains more than 8 wt % polymerized units of esters of acrylic or methacrylic acid, preferably no more than 5 wt %, preferably no more than 3 wt %, preferably no more than 1 wt %.


Preferably, the polymer has Mw of at least 8,000, preferably at least 9,000, preferably at least 10,000, preferably at least 11,000, preferably at least 12,000; preferably no more than 70,000, preferably no more than 50,000, preferably no more than 30,000, preferably no more than 25,000.


The polymer may be used in combination with other polymers useful for controlling insoluble deposits in automatic dishwashers, including, e.g, polymers comprising combinations of residues of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid or other diacid monomers, esters of acrylic or methacrylic acid including polyethylene glycol esters, styrene monomers, AMPS and other sulfonated monomers, and substituted acrylamides or methacrylamides.


The polymer of this invention may be produced by any of the known techniques for polymerization of acrylic monomers. Preferably, the initiator does not contain phosphorus. Preferably, the polymer contains less than 1 wt % phosphorus, preferably less than 0.5 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt %, preferably the polymer contains no phosphorus. Preferably, polymerization is initiated with persulfate and the end group on the polymer is a sulfate or sulfonate. The polymer may be in the form of a water-soluble solution polymer, slurry, dried powder, or granules or other solid forms.


Other components of the automatic dishwashing detergent composition may include, e.g., surfactants, oxygen and/or chlorine bleaches, bleach activators, enzymes, foam suppressants, colors, fragrances, antibacterial agents and fillers. Typical surfactant levels depend on the particular surfactant(s) used; preferably the total amount of surfactants is from 0.5 wt % to 15 wt %, preferably at least 0.7 wt %, preferably at least 0.9 wt %; preferably no more than 10 wt %, preferably no more than 7 wt %, preferably no more than 4 wt %, preferably no more than 2 wt %, preferably no more than 1 wt %. Preferably, the surfactant comprises a nonionic surfactant. Preferably, nonionic surfactants have the formula RO-(M)x-(N)y—OH or R—O-(M)x-(N)y—O—R′ in which M and N are units derived from alkylene oxides (of which one is ethylene oxide), R represents a C6-C22 linear or branched alkyl group, and R′ represents a group derived from the reaction of an alcohol precursor with a C6-C22 linear or branched alkyl halide, epoxyalkane, or glycidyl ether. Fillers in tablets or powders are inert, water-soluble substances, typically sodium or potassium salts, e.g., sodium or potassium sulfate and/or chloride, and typically are present in amounts ranging from 0 wt % to 75 wt %. Fillers in gel formulations may include those mentioned above and also water. Fragrances, dyes, foam suppressants, enzymes and antibacterial agents usually total no more than 5 wt % of the composition.


Preferably, the composition has a pH (at 1 wt % in water) of at least 10, preferably at least 11.5; in some embodiments the pH is no greater than 13.


The composition can be formulated in any typical form, e.g., as a tablet, powder, monodose, sachet, paste, liquid or gel. The composition can be used under typical operating conditions for any typical automatic dishwasher. Typical water temperatures during the washing process preferably are from 20° C. to 85° C., preferably from 30° C. to 70° C. Typical concentrations for the composition as a percentage of total liquid in the dishwasher preferably are from 0.1 to 1 wt %, preferably from 0.2 to 0.7 wt %. With selection of an appropriate product form and addition time, the composition may be present in the prewash, main wash, penultimate rinse, final rinse, or any combination of these cycles.


EXAMPLES
Synthesis of Example Terpolymer











Phosphate Free


ADW


Objective: Prepare an AA/Maleic/AMPS//70/20/10


wt % dispersant, Mw~15K


















Kettle Charge
Grams
BOM
Procedure





DiH2O
275

Charge kettle and heat to 78 C.


Maleic
69
  20%



Anhydride





FeSO4 (0.15%)
3.32

Add pre-charges





Begin cofeeds at





78 C.


Kettle





Pre-charge





SMBS
2.8
 0.70%
Add CTA over80





mins


DiH2O
7

Add init over 95





mins





Add mono over 90 mins


Monomer





Cofeed





AA
278
  70%
Hold 10 mins at completition


AMPS
80
  10%
Add over 10 mins/hold 20





mins





Repeat chaser and hold 20





mins


Initiator Cofeed





NaPS
2.92
 0.73%
With cooling, add neut #1


DiH2O
30

Scavenge with peroxide





Post neutralize


CTA





SMBS
59.2
14.81%
Cool and pack


DiH2O
100
















Total Charged
1290.1


Chaser


Total Monomer
400


NaPS
0.53
 0.13%
Total Solids
534.40


DiH2O
15

% Solids
41.42










NaPS
0.53




DiH2O
15




NaOH (50%)
100




H2O2 (35%)
1.8




NaOH (50%)
150




DiH2O (rinse)
100





Observations:
Temp
RPM
Comments





 0′
78
176
Add SMBS kettle additive


 1′
78

Begin cofeeds


20′
78




30′
78




50′
78




70′
78




80′
78

SMBS cofeed completed


90′
78

Monomer completed


95′
78

Initiator completed, hold





Added chaser over 10 mins,





hold 20 mins





Repeat Chaser and hold.



60

Begin cooling. Add 1st





neutralizer





Scavenge





Add final neutralizer,





cool and pack











Characterizations:






Solids
41.03%


pH
6.85


Viscosity
600


Residual AA
0


Residual Maleic
343














GPC
Mw
Mn
Mw/Mn
Mp





Final
13861
1343
10.31
3438


Acusol 445
6674
1608
4.14
4208










Other polymers were made using the same process.


Preparation of Food Soil:
















Ingredients
Wt., g



















Water
700.0



Instant Gravy
25.0



Starch
5.0



Benzoic Acid
1.0



Margarine
100.0



Milk (3.5% Fat)
50.0



Ketchup
25.0



Mustard
25.0



Egg yolk
3.0



Total:
934.0











1. Bring water to a boil.


2. Mix in 16 oz paper cup: instant gravy, benzoic acid and starch; add this mixture to the boiling water.


3. Add milk and margarine.


4. Let the mixture cool down to approximately 40° C.


5. Fill the mixture into a bowl of Kitchen Machine (Polytron).


6. In a 16 oz paper cup, mix the egg yolk, ketchup and mustard using a spoon.


7. Add the cool down mixture to the bowl stirring continuously.


8. Let the mixture stir for 5 min.


9. Freeze the mixture.


10. The frozen slush is placed into the dishwasher prior to the starting program.


Conditions for Dishwashing Tests:
  • Machine: Kenmore SS-ADW, Model 15693
  • Wash program: Normal wash cycle with heated wash, fuzzy logic engaged, heated dry
  • Cycle time: ca. 2 h
  • Water hardness: 300 ppm as CaCO3 (confirmed by EDTA Titration)
  • Ca:Mg (molar): 2:1
  • Tank water T, ° C.: 54
  • ADW basin initial T, ° C.: 43
  • Total detergent weight, g 20
  • Food soil: STIWA (50 g per cycle)
  • Food soil charged when the detergent is charged to the wash liquor (20 min mark).


    After drying in open air, two glasses were rated from 1 (clean) to 5 (heavily fouled) on both fouling and spotting by two trained observers. (See ASTM-D 3556-85.)


Abbreviations

AA acrylic acid


ADW automatic dishwasher


AMPS 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid


EA ethyl acrylate


IA itaconic acid


Mal maleic acid


MGDA methylglycinediacetic acid, sodium salt


Mn number-average molecular weight


Mw weight-average molecular weight


TAED tetraacetylethylenediamine









TABLE 1







Polymers used in auto-dishwashing examples














Mon 1 (%)
Mon 2 (%)
Mon 3 (%)
Mw/1000
Mw/Mn
solids, %
















Polymer A
AA (70)
Mal (20)
AMPS (10)
13.9
10.3
41.0


Polymer B
AA (72)
AMPS (28)

16.5
4.0
92.0


Polymer C
AA (90)
Mal (10)

5.0
4.1
42.2


Polymer D
AA (70)
IA (20)
AMPS (10)
12.6
5.5
44.4


Polymer E
AA (70)
Mal (10)
AMPS (20)
12.4
6.6
38.6


Polymer F
AA (70)
Mal (20)
AMPS (10)
21.1
10.8
42.1


Polymer G*
AA (60)
Mal (20)
AMPS (10)
13.6
7.9
38.0





*The monomer mixture for Polymer G also contained 10% ethyl acrylate













TABLE 2







ADW Examples 1: Performance in Citrate-Based Formulations.














Comp.
Comp.



Comp.



Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 3
















Sodium Citrate, %
30
30
30
30
30
30


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
0
4
3
2
1
0


Polymer B, %
4
0
1
2
3
3


Polymer C, %
0
0
0
0
0
1


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Sodium Sulfate, %
16
16
16
16
16
16


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
2.0
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
2.2
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.5


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.9
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.2


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.3


Average Filming Rating
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.9


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
3.2
1.2
1.2
1.0
2.0
4.0


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
3.5
1.2
1.0
1.0
2.2
4.0


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
3.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
3.0
4.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
3.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
3.5
4.5


Average Rating
3.4
1.2
1.2
1.1
2.7
4.3






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 3







ADW Examples 2: Variations in Polymer Composition, Mol. Wt.
















Comp.

Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 4
Ex. 5
Ex. 4
Ex. 6
Ex. 5
Ex. 6
















Sodium Citrate, %
30
30
30
30
30
30


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
3
0
0
0
0
0


Polymer B, %
1
1
1
1
1
4


Polymer C, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Polymer D, %
0
3
0
0
0
0


Polymer E, %
0
0
3
0
0
0


Polymer F, %
0
0
0
3
0
0


Polymer G, %
0
0
0
0
3
0


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Sodium Sulfate, %
16
16
16
16
16
16


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.5
2.0
1.2
1.5
1.5
1.5


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
2.2
1.2
2.0
1.2
1.5


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.8
2.0
1.3
1.8
1.2
1.2


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.9
2.1
1.3
1.9
1.2
1.2


Average Filming Rating
1.7
2.1
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.4


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.2
1.5
3.2
1.5
3.5
4.0


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
1.5
3.5
1.5
3.5
4.0


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.5
1.6
3.5
2.0
3.5
3.3


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.6
1.7
3.5
2.0
3.5
3.5


Average Spotting Rating
1.5
1.6
3.4
1.8
3.5
3.7






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 4







ADW Examples 3: Performance in Mixed Citrate/MGDA Formulations














Comp.
Comp.
Comp.






Ex. 7
Ex. 8
Ex. 9
Ex. 7
Ex. 8
Ex. 9
















Sodium Citrate, %
10
10
10
10
10
10


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
0
0
4
3
2
1


Polymer B, %
4
4
0
1
2
3


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
10
5
5
5
5
5


Sodium Sulfate, %
26
31
31
31
31
31


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.5
1.5
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.8


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
1.5
3.0
1.5
1.5
1.8


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.5
1.9
2.6
1.6
1.6
2.0


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.7
1.7
2.6
1.7
1.8
2.0


Average Filming Rating
1.6
1.7
2.8
1.6
1.6
1.9


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
2.2
2.8
1.2
1.5
1.5
2.0


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
2.5
3.5
1.2
1.5
1.5
2.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
3.0
3.3
1.5
1.2
1.5
2.0


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
3.2
3.7
1.3
1.5
1.5
2.7


Average Spotting Rating
2.7
3.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.3






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 5







ADW Examples 4: Performance in MGDA-Based Formulations.














Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 10
Ex. 11
Ex. 12
Ex. 13
Ex. 14
Ex. 15
















Sodium Citrate, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
2
0
3
0
1
4


Polymer B, %
2
0
1
4
3
0


Polymer C, %
0
4
0
0
0
0


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


Sodium Sulfate, %
31
31
31
31
31
31


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.8
2.5
2.2
1.5
2.0
1.2


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
2.0
2.8
3.0
1.5
2.5
1.5


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.5
2.0
2.1
1.4
1.8
1.8


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.9
2.0
2.1
1.4
1.8
1.8


Average Filming Rating
1.8
2.3
2.4
1.5
2.0
1.6


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.0
1.2
1.2
2.5
1.2
1.2


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.2
1.5
1.2
2.8
1.5
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.2
1.5
1.6
3.0
2.0
1.2


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.2
1.5
1.6
3.5
2.5
1.4


Average Spotting Rating
1.2
1.4
1.4
3.0
1.8
1.3






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 6







ADW Examples 5: Performance in Surfactant-Free Formulations.















Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 10
Ex. 16
Ex. 17
Ex. 18
Ex. 19
Ex. 20
















Sodium Citrate, %
20
20
20
0
0
0


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Polymer A, %
2
0
4
0
2
4


Polymer B, %
2
4
0
4
2
0


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
0
0
0
15
15
15


Sodium Sulfate, %
27
27
27
32
32
32


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.5
2.0
3.5
1.5
1.5
1.8


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
1.8
3.5
1.5
1.5
2.2


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.8
1.8
2.8
1.8
1.7
1.8


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.8
1.8
2.8
1.8
1.7
1.9


Average Filming Rating
1.7
1.9
3.2
1.7
1.6
1.9


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.2
3.5
1.2
2.5
1.5
1.2


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
3.5
1.2
2.5
1.5
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.6
3.5
1.5
2.1
1.5
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.5
3.2
1.5
2.3
1.5
1.5


Average Spotting Rating
1.5
3.4
1.4
2.4
1.5
1.4






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 7







ADW Examples 6: Effect on Citrate-Based Formulations with Varying Disilicate Levels.
















Comp.
Comp.
Comp.
Comp.



Ex. 11
Ex. 12
Ex. 21
Ex. 22
Ex. 23
Ex. 24
















Sodium Citrate, %
20
20
20
20
20
20


Sodium Carbonate, %
25
25
25
25
25
25


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
2
2
0
0
4
4


Polymer B, %
2
2
4
4
0
0


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
0
5
0
5
0
5


MGDAb, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Sodium Sulfate, %
28
23
28
23
28
23


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
2.2
1.5
1.2
2.0
2.5
3.8


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
2.5
1.5
1.2
1.5
2.5
3.8


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.5
2.3
3.0


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.6
2.3
3.2


Average Filming Rating
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.7
2.4
3.5


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
2.0
1.2
3.0
3.0
1.5
1.2


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.5
1.5
2.5
3.0
1.5
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.7
1.8
3.5
3.5
1.4
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.7
1.7
3.5
3.5
1.4
1.5


Average Spotting Rating
1.7
1.6
3.1
3.3
1.5
1.4






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.














TABLE 8







ADW Examples 7: Performance in High-Carbonate Bases.
















Comp.






Ex. 13
Ex. 14
Ex. 25
Ex. 15
Ex. 16
Ex. 17
















Sodium Citrate, %
20
20
20
20
20
20


Sodium Carbonate, %
40
40
40
40
40
40


Sodium Percarbonate, %
15
15
15
15
15
15


TAED, %
4
4
4
4
4
4


TRITON ™ DF-16, %
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75


TERGITOL ™ L61, %
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


Polymer A, %
2
3
0
1
1
1


Polymer B, %
2
1
4
2
3
1


Polymer C, %
0
0
0
1
0
2


α-Amylase from Bacillus, %
1
1
1
1
1
1


Protease from Bacillus, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


Sodium disilicatea, %
2
2
2
2
2
2


MGDAb, %
0
0
0
0
0
0


Sodium Sulfate, %
11
11
11
11
11
11


Total Wt %
100
100
100
100
100
100


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.2
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.5


Filming (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.2
1.8
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.5


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.6
1.9
1.4
1.6
1.6
2.0


Filming (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.7
1.8
1.4
1.7
1.7
2.1


Average Filming Rating
1.4
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.8


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 1)
1.2
1.2
4.0
2.2
3.5
2.0


Spotting (Obs. 1, Glass 2)
1.2
1.5
4.0
2.5
3.5
1.5


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 1)
1.5
1.5
3.5
2.2
3.0
1.7


Spotting (Obs. 2, Glass 2)
1.5
1.5
3.5
2.4
2.9
1.6


Average Spotting Rating
1.4
1.4
3.8
2.3
3.2
1.7






aBRITESIL H 20, PQ Corp.; bTRILON M, BASF.






Claims
  • 1. A phosphorus-free automatic dishwashing detergent composition comprising: (a) 1.5 to 8 wt % of a first polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 65 to 75 wt % acrylic acid, (ii) 16 to 26 wt % of a monoethylenically unsaturated dicarboxylic acid selected from the group consisting of maleic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid, mesaconic acid and citraconic acid and (iii) 8 to 17 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid; and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000;(b) 0.5 to 8 wt % of a second polymer comprising polymerized units of: (i) 65 to 93 wt % (meth)acrylic acid, (ii) 7 to 35 wt % 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS); and having Mw from 5,000 to 100,000;(c) 20 to 45 wt % carbonate,(d) 5 to 50 wt % citrate and(e) 10 to 30 wt % of a bleaching agent;
  • 2. The composition of claim 1 in which the composition contains less than 0.2 wt % phosphorus.
  • 3. The composition of claim 2 in which said first polymer and said second polymer each have Mw from 8,000 to 50,000.
  • 4. The composition of claim 3 in which the composition comprises from 20 to 40 wt % citrate.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
14290306 Oct 2014 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2015/054370 10/7/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/057602 4/14/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
8101027 Vandermeulen et al. Jan 2012 B2
20100167975 Vandermeulen et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100234264 Creamer Sep 2010 A1
20100294309 Tropsch Nov 2010 A1
20110226288 Warkotsch et al. Sep 2011 A1
20130055508 Miralles et al. Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2657329 Oct 2013 EP
2016057391 Apr 2016 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170298300 A1 Oct 2017 US