Additive manufacturing system for object creation from powder using a high flux laser for two-dimensional printing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12011873
  • Patent Number
    12,011,873
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 12, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 18, 2024
    7 months ago
Abstract
A method of additive manufacture is disclosed. The method can include providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including helium gas. A high flux laser beam is directed at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed. Powder is melted and fused within the defined two dimensional region, with less than 50% by weight of the powder particles being displaced into any defined two dimensional region that shares an edge or corner with the defined two dimensional region where powder melting and fusing occurs.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to additive manufacturing and, more particularly, to powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using a high flux laser for two-dimensional printing.


BACKGROUND

Traditional component machining often relies on removal of material by drilling, cutting, or grinding to form a part. In contrast, additive manufacturing, also referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, typically involves sequential layer-by-layer addition of material to build a part.


In one high throughput additive manufacturing system, two-dimensional regions or “tiles” can be melted from a metal or other material powder layer using a high flux laser beam. However, quickly melting many types of powders requires an immensely high energy concentration, resulting in generation and drastic volume expansion of the plasma. When plasma sustains and expands its volume, a shockwave is created which serves to push away significant amount of powders around the printed (or laser irradiated) area into surrounding areas. Effectively, this chain reaction of laser beam irradiation, plasma generation, plasma sustaining and expansion, shockwave propagation, and powder movement reduces quality of the printing process.


This is a particular problem for high-power powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing systems. Typical conventional powder bed fusion additive manufacturing systems currently available use individual laser beam of about 300 W to 1000 W in power and 50 micro meter (50 um) to 100 um focused beam diameter. This translates to only about several MW/cm2 of laser power flux (for example, a 1000 W circular laser beam with a focused diameter of 100 um has a flux of [1000 W/(π*(0.005 cm){circumflex over ( )}2)]=12.74 MW/cm2), which is sufficient to melt and boil the metal powder, but doesn't reach energy densities likely to generate and sustain plasma. Further, since the melt volume is small, any plasma caused effects are minor. Typically, droplets of metal splashes can be seen during the printing process in conventional systems, but there is little to no plasma initiated shockwave to push away powders around the printed area, causing a “Halo effect” that severely and negatively effects the printing process.


Improved processes and systems are needed to prevent unacceptable halo effects when using high power flux laser beam to quickly melt and solidify the powder layer within the printing area. A useful laser beams power flux for two-dimensional powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing systems can range from hundreds of kW/cm2 to even GW/cm2 level in some scenarios. Unfortunately, in an argon environment, these levels of laser power flux are typically sufficient to generate and sustain plasma that pushes away powder particles to form unacceptable halos during manufacture.


SUMMARY

To reduce such halos and other detrimental printing effects, in one embodiment an additive manufacturing method using metal or other powders can use an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including helium gas. A high flux laser beam, having a power density greater than 100 megawatts/square centimeter, is directed at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed. Powder is melted and fused within the defined two dimensional region, with less than 10% by weight of the powder particles being displaced into any defined two dimensional region that shares an edge or corner with the defined two dimensional region where powder melting and fusing occurs. In other cases less than 20% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region, in other cases less than 40% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region, in other cases less than 80% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region, in other cases less than 90% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region, in other cases less than 95% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region, in other cases less than 99% by weight of powder particles are ejected into areas outside the defined two dimensional region.


In one embodiment, the helium gas atmosphere is at least 1% helium by volume.


In one embodiment, the helium gas atmosphere in the enclosure is maintained between 0 and 100 bar of absolute pressure.


In one embodiment, the helium gas atmosphere in the enclosure is maintained at a temperature between 20 and 5000 degrees Kelvin.


In one embodiment, wherein the laser beam flux is between 0.1 megawatts per square centimeter and 10 gigawatts per square centimeter.


In one embodiment, the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed is between 0.0025 square centimeters and 2500 square centimeters.


In one embodiment, thickness of the powder layer on the powder bed is between 0.01 micron and 5000 microns.


In one embodiment, a calibration step can be used that includes adjusting at least one of the laser beam flux or area of the defined two dimensional region in response to detected area of a halo formed by a preliminary halo test.


In one embodiment, a detected radius of the halo is greater than 50 microns beyond the boundary of the defined two dimensional area.


In one embodiment, a method of additive manufacture includes providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including at least 50% helium gas at greater than atmospheric pressure. A laser beam having a flux greater than 100 megawatts/square centimeter can be directed at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed to melt and fuse powder within the defined two dimensional region.


In one embodiment a method of additive manufacture includes providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including at least 50% helium gas at less than atmospheric pressure. A laser beam having a flux greater than 100 megawatts/square centimeter can be directed at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed to melt and fuse powder within the defined two dimensional region.


In one embodiment a method of additive manufacture includes providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including at least 50% helium gas heated to greater than 20 degrees Celsius. A laser beam having a flux greater than 100 megawatts/square centimeter can be directed at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed to melt and fuse powder within the defined two dimensional region.


In one embodiment, an atmosphere can contain at least one of Ar, He, Ne, Kr, Xe, CO2, N2, O2, SF6, CH4, CO, N2O, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, 1-C4H8, cic-2, C4H7, 1,3-C4H6, 1,2-C4H6, C5H12, n-C5H12, i-C5H12, n-C6H14, C2H3Cl, C7H16, C8H18, C10H22, C11H24, C12H26, C13H28, C14H30, C15H32, C16H34, C6H6, C6H5-CH3, C8H10, C2H5OH, CH3OH, and iC4H8.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the present disclosure are described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figures unless otherwise specified.



FIG. 1A illustrates a powder layer before response to laser;



FIG. 1B illustrates powder movement in response to laser induced plasma under a substantially pure argon atmosphere;



FIG. 1C illustrates powder movement in response to laser induced plasma under a helium containing atmosphere;



FIG. 2 illustrates an apparatus for two-dimensional additive manufacture with reduced plasma formation at high laser flux levels which includes a method of determining laser flux and a method of detecting the plasma induced powder movement; and



FIG. 3 illustrates the temperature profile through the powder and the base substrate when printing in a substantially pure argon atmosphere versus helium containing atmosphere.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way of illustrating specific exemplary embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the concepts disclosed herein, and it is to be understood that modifications to the various disclosed embodiments may be made, and other embodiments may be utilized, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.


An additive manufacturing system which has one or more energy sources, including in one embodiment, one or more laser or electron beams, are positioned to emit one or more energy beams. Beam shaping optics may receive the one or more energy beams from the energy source and form a single beam. An energy patterning unit receives or generates the single beam and transfers a two-dimensional pattern to the beam and may reject the unused energy not in the pattern. An image relay receives the two-dimensional patterned beam and focuses it as a two-dimensional image to a desired location on a height fixed or movable build platform (e.g. a powder bed). In certain embodiments, some or all of any rejected energy from the energy patterning unit is reused.


In some embodiments, multiple beams from the laser array(s) are combined using a beam homogenizer. This combined beam can be directed at an energy patterning unit that includes either a transmissive or reflective pixel addressable light valve. In one embodiment, the pixel addressable light valve includes both a liquid crystal module having a polarizing element and a light projection unit providing a two-dimensional input pattern. The two-dimensional image focused by the image relay can be sequentially directed toward multiple locations on a powder bed to build a 3D structure.


An energy source generates photon (light), electron, ion, or other suitable energy beams or fluxes capable of being directed, shaped, and patterned. Multiple energy sources can be used in combination. The energy source can include lasers, incandescent light, concentrated solar, other light sources, electron beams, or ion beams. Possible laser types include, but are not limited to: Gas Lasers, Chemical Lasers, Dye Lasers, Metal Vapor Lasers, Solid State Lasers (e.g. fiber), Semiconductor (e.g. diode) Lasers, Free Electron Laser, Gas Dynamic Laser, “Nickel-like” Samarium Laser, Raman Laser, or Nuclear Pumped Laser.


A Gas Laser can include lasers such as a Helium-neon laser, Argon laser, Krypton laser, Xenon ion laser, Nitrogen laser, Carbon dioxide laser, Carbon monoxide laser or Excimer laser.


A Chemical Laser can include lasers such as a Hydrogen fluoride laser, Deuterium fluoride laser, COIL (Chemical oxygen-iodine laser), or Agil (All gas-phase iodine laser).


A Metal Vapor Laser can include lasers such as a Helium-cadmium (HeCd) metal-vapor laser, Helium-mercury (HeHg) metal-vapor laser, Helium-selenium (HeSe) metal-vapor laser, Helium-silver (HeAg) metal-vapor laser, Strontium Vapor Laser, Neon-copper (NeCu) metal-vapor laser, Copper vapor laser, Gold vapor laser, or Manganese (Mn/MnCl2) vapor laser. In addition, a new type of laser which uses metal vapor is the so-called alkali metal vapor lasers which includes all the alkali metals as possible laser ions with the current most promising being Rubidium.


A Solid State Laser can include lasers such as a Ruby laser, Nd:YAG laser, NdCrYAG laser, Er:YAG laser, Neodymium YLF (Nd:YLF) solid-state laser, Neodymium doped Yttrium orthovanadate(Nd:YVO4) laser, Neodymium doped yttrium calcium oxoborateNd:YCa4O(BO3)3 or simply Nd:YCOB, Neodymium glass(Nd:Glass) laser, Titanium sapphire(Ti:sapphire) laser, Thulium YAG (Tm:YAG) laser, Thulium YLF (Tm:YLF), Ytterbium YAG (Yb:YAG) laser, Ytterbium:2O3 (glass or ceramics) laser, Ytterbium doped glass laser (rod, plate/chip, and fiber), Holmium YAG (Ho:YAG) laser, Chromium ZnSe (Cr:ZnSe) laser, Cerium doped lithium strontium (or calcium)aluminum fluoride(Ce:LiSAF, Ce:LiCAF), Promethium 147 doped phosphate glass(147Pm+3:Glass) solid-state laser, Chromium doped chrysoberyl (alexandrite) laser, Erbium doped anderbium-ytterbium co-doped glass lasers, Trivalent uranium doped calcium fluoride (U:CaF2) solid-state laser, Divalent samarium doped calcium fluoride(Sm:CaF2) laser, or F-Center laser.


A Semiconductor Laser can include laser medium types such as GaN, InGaN, AlGaInP, AlGaAs, InGaAsP, GaInP, InGaAs, InGaAsO, GaInAsSb, lead salt, Vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL), Quantum cascade laser, Hybrid silicon laser, or combinations thereof.


For example, in one embodiment a single Nd:YAG q-switched laser can be used in conjunction with multiple semiconductor lasers. In another embodiment, an electron beam can be used in conjunction with an ultraviolet semiconductor laser array. In still other embodiments, a two-dimensional array of lasers can be used. In some embodiments with multiple energy sources, pre-patterning of an energy beam can be done by selectively activating and deactivating energy sources.


The laser beam can be shaped by a great variety of imaging optics to combine, focus, diverge, reflect, refract, homogenize, adjust intensity, adjust frequency, or otherwise shape and direct one or more laser beams received from a laser beam source toward the energy patterning unit. In one embodiment, multiple light beams, each having a distinct light wavelength, can be combined using wavelength selective mirrors (e.g. dichroics) or diffractive elements. In other embodiments, multiple beams can be homogenized or combined using multifaceted mirrors, microlenses, and refractive or diffractive optical elements.


Energy patterning can include static or dynamic energy patterning elements. For example, photon, electron, or ion beams can be blocked by masks with fixed or movable elements. To increase flexibility and ease of image patterning, pixel addressable masking, image generation, or transmission can be used. In some embodiments, the energy patterning unit includes addressable light valves, alone or in conjunction with other patterning mechanisms to provide patterning. The light valves can be transmissive, reflective, or use a combination of transmissive and reflective elements. Patterns can be dynamically modified using electrical or optical addressing. In one embodiment, a transmissive optically addressed light valve acts to rotate polarization of light passing through the valve, with optically addressed pixels forming patterns defined by a light projection source. In another embodiment, a reflective optically addressed light valve includes a write beam for modifying polarization of a read beam. In yet another embodiment, an electron patterning device receives an address pattern from an electrical or photon stimulation source and generates a patterned emission of electrons.


A rejected energy handling unit can be used to disperse, redirect, or utilize energy not patterned and passed through the energy pattern image relay. In one embodiment, the rejected energy handling unit can include passive or active cooling elements that remove heat from the energy patterning unit. In other embodiments, the rejected energy handling unit can include a “beam dump” to absorb and convert to heat any beam energy not used in defining the energy pattern. In still other embodiments, rejected beam energy can be recycled using beam shaping optics. Alternatively, or in addition, rejected beam energy can be directed to the article processing unit for heating or further patterning. In certain embodiments, rejected beam energy can be directed to additional energy patterning systems or article processing units.


An image relay receives a patterned image (typically two-dimensional) from the energy patterning unit and guides it toward the article processing unit. In a manner similar to beam shaping optics, the image relay can include optics to combine, focus, diverge, reflect, refract, adjust intensity, adjust frequency, or otherwise shape and direct the patterned image.


An article processing unit can include a walled chamber and bed, and a material dispenser for distributing material. The material dispenser can distribute, remove, mix, provide gradations or changes in material type or particle size, or adjust layer thickness of material. The material can include metal, ceramic, glass, polymeric powders, other melt-able material capable of undergoing a thermally induced phase change from solid to liquid and back again, or combinations thereof. The material can further include composites of melt-able material and non-melt-able material where either or both components can be selectively targeted by the imaging relay system to melt the component that is melt-able, while either leaving along the non-melt-able material or causing it to undergo a vaporizing/destroying/combusting or otherwise destructive process. In certain embodiments, slurries, sprays, coatings, wires, strips, or sheets of materials can be used. Unwanted material can be removed for disposable or recycling by use of blowers, vacuum systems, sweeping, vibrating, shaking, tipping, or inversion of the bed.


In addition to material handling components, the article processing unit can include components for holding and supporting 3D structures, mechanisms for heating or cooling the chamber, auxiliary or supporting optics, and sensors and control mechanisms for monitoring or adjusting material or environmental conditions. The article processing unit can, in whole or in part, support a vacuum or inert gas atmosphere to reduce unwanted chemical interactions as well as to mitigate the risks of fire or explosion (especially with reactive metals).


A control processor can be connected to control any components of additive manufacturing system. The control processor can be connected to variety of sensors, actuators, heating or cooling systems, monitors, and controllers to coordinate operation. A wide range of sensors, including imagers, light intensity monitors, thermal, pressure, or gas sensors can be used to provide information used in control or monitoring. The control processor can be a single central controller, or alternatively, can include one or more independent control systems. The controller processor is provided with an interface to allow input of manufacturing instructions. Use of a wide range of sensors allows various feedback control mechanisms that improve quality, manufacturing throughput, and energy efficiency.


This invention pertains using specific engineered gas as the process gas in powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing process that requires a high laser power flux enough to generate and sustain plasma at some point in the duration of the pulse. There are several necessary properties in such an engineered gas: chemically inert, high ionization energy, high thermal conductivity, and low density (or atomic weight).


It is important that any process gas used in the powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing processes doesn't prohibit the additive manufacturing process due to chemical reactions with the powder during printing. In general, an inert gas satisfies this requirement, and improve the printing process or material properties of printed parts.


Since it is critical to minimize the generation of plasma, high ionization energy makes it more difficult to ionize the gas and initiate the plasma. In some embodiments, plasma may be initiated from evolved vapor/particulates which is formed from ablated/evaporated material from the powder (Fe, Cr, Al, Co, Ti, Si, etc. . . . ), in particular from metal components. This evolution of vapor/particulate material from the surface can happen at such high speeds due to laser heating the powder that a sufficient amount of material can enter the gas area above the area being printed, even while the laser is still firing. The evolved material can have an extremely high absorptivity of the laser light still incident on the tile being printed, and as such, it super-heats, generating a plasma which not only creates a blast wave and “halo” effect, but also begins to reflect and disperse any further incident laser energy. This rejection effect can lower the amount of energy that makes it to print bed and can negatively affect the quality of the printing process within the tile. High thermal conductivity of the process gas allows the gas to quickly conduct away the heat generated from the laser heating and melting process. High thermal conductivity therefore serves the purpose of extinguishing the plasma before plasma volume expansion sustains and therefore minimize the mechanical impact of the shockwave that pushes away the surrounding powders. High thermal conductivity of the process gas also serves to remove the heat from the powder layer's top surface, therefore reduces the vertical temperature gradient in the powder layer and allows more uniform heating and melting of the powder layer. As a result, the higher conductivity of the ideal process gas causes more heat to be transferred into the base (print plate or previous printed layer underneath the current layer) and therefor brings the base temperature up closer to the melting point without melting the top of the current powder layer. This creates beneficial thermal conditions to bond the powder layer to the base plate or previously printed layer underneath the current layer.


While it is ideal to eliminate the plasma in the printing process altogether, if there is still some plasma generated during the process, low atomic weight of the gas helps to reduce the kinetic energy carried in the shockwave and therefore reduce the mechanical impact on the surrounding powders.


Based on the above analyses, several noble and inert/non-reactive gases can be considered as the candidates in the mix of the engineered gas to solve the aforementioned plasma generation and “Halo” problem: Ar, He, Ne, Kr, Xe, CO2, N2, O2, SF6, CH4, CO, N2O, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, 1-C4H8, cic-2, C4H7, 1,3-C4H6, 1,2-C4H6, C5H12, n-C5H12, i-C5H12, n-C6H14, C2H3Cl, C7H16, C8H18, C10H22, C11H24, C12H26, C13H28, C14H30, C15H32, C16H34, C6H6, C6H5-CH3, C8H10, C2H5OH, CH3OH, iC4H8. In some embodiments, refrigerants or large inert molecules (including but not limited to sulfur hexafluoride) can be used. An enclosure atmospheric composition to have at least about 1% He by volume (or number density), along with selected percentages of inert/non-reactive gasses can be used. In some embodiments, greater than 1% He can be used, while in other embodiments, greater than 10% He can be used, while in other embodiments, greater than 20% He can be used, while in other embodiments, greater than 40% He can be used, while in other embodiments, greater than 80% He can be used, while in other embodiments, 95% or greater He can be used. In addition to the composition of the engineered gas, ranges of the operating temperature and pressure of the engineered gas can also be selected to minimize plasma generation and improve printing quality. Complex molecules and large atomic weight gasses can have benefits related to having larger mass and taking much more force or energy to move. While larger molecules such as sulfur hexafluoride have a lower thermal conductivity than He (similar to Ar), the gas is much denser, and would act to push out other gasses (O2, H2O vapor, N2, etc. . . . ) that are evolved from the powder during the printing process of heating it up to its melting temperature, and inducing a phase change. These lighter gasses would effectively float atop the much denser gas, and rapidly remove themselves from the process area. Additionally, more complex molecules have vibrational and rotational energy storage modes which noble gasses do not. These additional energy modes increase the specific heat of the gas at high temperatures and would help to reduce ionization potential of the gas by absorbing more energy from the surrounding metal vapor. Additionally, in the case of SF6 (sulfur hexafluoride) if the main inert gas molecule was to be broken up (either through plasma breakup, or through interaction with evolved radicals such as O, C, H, OH, various combinations, various combinations including species from the powder alloy, etc. . . . ) the radicals formed from the breakup would help to scavenge evolved gas during the printing process (O, O2, H, OH, H2O, Fe, Cr, etc. . . . ). Different gasses might be used for printing different materials by changing the atomic nature, density, or temperature of the gas.


Such an engineered gas, predominantly helium, acts to mitigate plasma generation and “Halo” issues. In addition, predominantly helium engineered gases enhance bonding and operation of powder bed fusion based additive manufacturing process within controlled temperature and pressure ranges.


In addition to engineering the species of gas, the operating conditions such as temperature can be used to further enhance the desired heat conduction or heat transfer coefficient away from the tile surface. For example, in the case of an engineered He gas at 1 bar, the thermal conductivity can double from ˜0.15 to ˜0.3 between 0 C and 600 C. Increasing the pressure in turn can also help this process by increasing the heat transfer coefficient and increasing the amount of energy required to move a blast wave. Enclosure atmospheric temperatures can be set between 20 degrees Kelvin (i.e. cryogenic) and 5000 degrees Kelvin. In some embodiments, the atmospheric temperature of the enclosure can be set between 200 and 600 degrees Celsius.


Adjustment to operating conditions such as pressure can be used to further enhance additive manufacture. Enclosure atmospheric helium gas atmosphere in the enclosure is can be maintained between 0 and 100 bar of absolute pressure. In some embodiments, the atmospheric temperature of the enclosure is below atmospheric pressure. In other embodiments, the atmospheric temperature of the enclosure is above atmospheric pressure. During the process of additive manufacturing, the laser interacts with the powdered material and the substrate, and the melted powder material begins to coalesce. This process has the potential to trap gas bubbles gaps in the material. By sufficiently reducing the pressure of the gas, these bubbles will begin to shrink, and eventually collapse on themselves, generating a higher density material during the melting process. In some cases, this process can occur at between 0.5 and 1.0 bar absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 0.25 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 0.1 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 0.01 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 0.001 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 0.0001 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 1E-6 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 1E-6 and 1E-3 bar of absolute pressure, in other instances it can occur at 1E-10 and 1.0 bar of absolute pressure.


Additionally, adjustments to operating conditions such as high pressure at various temperatures can be used to benefit the quality of parts after or during the additive process. Historically, the process of Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is done after a part has been built from additive manufacturing, however there are considerable benefits to introducing it during the process. The HIP process can be operated between 500 and 1,000 bar, and 400 to 1500 C. However, it is not enough to simply operate the print process at high temperature and high pressure as the HIP process is based around compressing gas pockets of lower pressure. To this end, the pressure needs to be cycled at various stages of the print process. The print process would continue at low pressure, and then intermittently it would pause and pressure would be increased at elevated temperature to drive out pores and gas pockets.


Other derivative or alternative methods can include recycle and recirculation of engineered process gas in-situ during the process, or introduction of engineered He containing process gas environment only locally in the printing chamber where laser beam melting the metal powder happens.


Advantageously, using the described engineered gas and operating conditions, plasma generation and volume expansion is suppressed or minimized during printing process. Powder movement and mechanical impact on the surrounding metal powders (“Halo”) in response to laser beam melting and fusing is minimized and has insignificant impact on the continuation of aspects of an additive printing process (e.g. “Stitching” together adjacent tiles). Minimum generation and volume expansion of the plasma also can minimize the “blocking” or “scattering” effect of the plasma to the laser beam above the printing area.


High thermal conductivity of the engineered He containing process gas also helps to reduce the vertical temperature gradient across the depth of metal powder layer and therefore create more uniform heating and melting condition. It enables using high power flux laser(s) to quickly heat, melt, and solidify the metal powders for bonding with a base material.


The power levels used in the process, and the amount of “Halo” that occurs, will vary depending on the material used, and environment it is processed in. In some embodiments, 100 kilowatts per square centimeter is enough, in others, more than a gigawatt per square centimeter can be used, or would require mitigation through the use of an engineered process gas at a specific temperature and pressure.



FIG. 1A illustrates a powder layer system 100A in cross and top section before response to a laser. Cross-sectional view 101, taken from slice 107, shows a layer of powder 3 containing possible tiles to be printed, resting on a substrate 102. Top view 104 shows the view of the same grouping of tiles from above. In this example, there is powder in the region of a tile to be printed 106. The tile to be printed is surrounded by powder making up future potential tiles to be printed 105.



FIG. 1B illustrates a powder layer system 100B in cross and top section responding to a laser beam having a flux greater than 100 megawatts per square centimeter and typically ranging between 100 megawatts and 10 gigawatts per square centimeter. At such power flux levels, significant plasma is induced in a substantially argon atmosphere environment. Cross-sectional view 101, taken from slice 107, shows a layer of powder 103 containing possible tiles to be printed, resting on a substrate 102. Top view 104 shows the view of the same grouping of tiles from above. In this example, there is a tile 106, which has been printed with laser 108, in a substantially argon environment 109. The printed tile is surrounded by powder making up future potential tiles to be printed 105. Because the printing was carried out in argon, vapor generated from the heating of the powder become super-heated by the laser 108, forming a gas expansion wave which pushes powder formerly in a nice uniform layer 103, out of the “Halo” zone 110 next to printed tile 106. The movement of this powder causes further mounding on nearby tiles 112 which changes their layer thickness. The displacement of powder from the “Halo” zone 110 and mounding of powder in nearby tiles 112 cause problems for printing future layers.



FIG. 1C illustrates a powder layer system 100C in cross and top section in response to a laser beam having a flux greater than 100 megawatts per square centimeter and typically ranging between 100 megawatts and 10 gigawatts per square centimeter, under a predominantly helium containing atmosphere. Cross-sectional view 101, taken from slice 107, shows a layer of powder 103 containing possible tiles to be printed, resting on a substrate 102. Top view 104 shows the view of the same grouping of tiles from above. In this example, there is a tile 106, which has been printed with laser 108, in a predominantly Helium environment 109. The printed tile is surrounded by powder making up future potential tiles to be printed 105. Because the printing was carried out in helium, vapor generated from the heating of the powder does not become super-heated by the laser 108, the gas expansion wave which has the potential to push powder out of a formerly uniform layer 103 is mostly or completely eliminated, allowing for the powder 105 next to the printed tile 106 to be printed in future shots. Furthermore, powder layer 103 is not increased, preventing issues on future layers.



FIG. 2 illustrates a system 200 in which incoming laser beam 201 is directed to the powder bed by mirror 211 forming the printing laser beam 202. An insignificant part of the beam transmits through mirror 211, reaching the laser flux sensor 205 to detect laser flux. A vision system 206 is targeted at the printing area 203 on the base substrate 204. The image taken by the vision system 206 is transferred to a computer processor 207. The controller 208 utilizes the result of image processing to generate control signals to modulate the amount of helium supplied to the printing chamber 210 from the helium tank 209.



FIG. 3 illustrates the difference in temperature gradient between printing in a substantially pure argon atmosphere 303 and a helium containing atmosphere 302, across the vertical direction in powder layer thickness 301. Upon achieving the same top surface powder melting temperature T0, the temperature at the bottom of the powder layer is much colder in the argon atmosphere TA 304, then the temperature achieved in the helium containing atmosphere TH 305. This difference in temperature at the time of melting allows for deeper penetration of the laser, and thus the processing of deeper powder depths than achievable with Argon in the same conditions.


Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. It is also understood that other embodiments of this invention may be practiced in the absence of an element/step not specifically disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method of additive manufacture, the method comprising: providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including a helium gas;directing a laser beam having a flux greater than 0.1 megawatts/square centimeter at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed; andmelting and fusing powder within the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed, with less than 50% of a mass of powder particles being displaced in another defined two dimensional region sharing at least one of an edge and a corner with the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed where the powder melting and fusing occur,wherein the atmosphere further comprises an inert sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) that displaces other gases evolved from the powder during heating of the powder and at least one of i-C4H10, cic-2, C4H7, 1,3-C4H6, 1,2-C4H6, C5H12, i-C5H12, C2H3Cl, C8H18, C10H22, C11H24, C12H26, C13H28, C14H30, C15H32, C16H34, C6H6, C6H5—CH3, C8H10, C2H5OH, CH3OH, and iC4H8.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the helium gas atmosphere is at least 1% helium by volume.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the helium gas atmosphere in the enclosure is maintained at greater than 0 bar of absolute pressure and up to 100 bar of absolute pressure.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the helium gas atmosphere in the enclosure is maintained at a temperature between 20 and 5000 degrees Kelvin.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the laser beam flux is between 0.1 megawatts per square centimeter and 10 gigawatts per square centimeter.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed is between 0.0025 square centimeters and 2500 square centimeters.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein a thickness of a powder layer on the powder bed is between 0.01 micron and 5000 microns.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: adjusting at least one of the laser beam flux or area of the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed where the powder melting and fusing occur in response to a detected area of a halo formed by a preliminary halo test.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein a detected radius of the halo is greater than 50 microns beyond a boundary of the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed where the powder melting and fusing occur.
  • 10. A method of additive manufacture, the method comprising: providing an enclosure surrounding a powder bed and having an atmosphere including a helium gas (He), an inert sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) that displaces other gases evolved from a powder during heating of the powder, and at least one of i-C4H10, cic-2, C4H7, 1,3-C4H6, 1,2-C4H6, C5H12, i-C5H12, C2H3Cl, C8H18, C10H22, C11H24, C12H26, C13H28, C14H30, C15H32, C16H34, C6H6, C6H5—CH3, C8H10, C2H5OH, CH3OH, and iC4H8;directing a laser beam having a flux greater than 0.1 megawatts/square centimeter at a defined two dimensional region of the powder bed; andmelting and fusing the powder within the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed, with less than 50% of a mass of powder particles being displaced in another defined two dimensional region sharing at least one of an edge and a corner with the defined two dimensional region of the powder bed where the powder melting and fusing occur,wherein at least 50% of the atmosphere is comprised of the helium gas which is heated to greater than 20 degrees Celsius.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATION

The present disclosure is part of a non-provisional patent application claiming the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/779,978, filed on Dec. 14, 2018, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (125)
Number Name Date Kind
4247508 Housholder Jan 1981 A
4944817 Bourell Jul 1990 A
5155324 Deckard Oct 1992 A
5182170 Marcus Jan 1993 A
5236637 Hull Aug 1993 A
5314003 Mackay May 1994 A
5382308 Bourell Jan 1995 A
5508489 Benda Apr 1996 A
5640667 Freitag Jun 1997 A
5674414 Schweizer Oct 1997 A
5837960 Lewis Nov 1998 A
6005717 Neuberger Dec 1999 A
6405095 Jang Jun 2002 B1
6462306 Kitai Oct 2002 B1
6560001 Igasaki May 2003 B1
6676892 Das Jan 2004 B2
6717106 Nagano Apr 2004 B2
7088432 Zhang Aug 2006 B2
7444046 Karlsen Oct 2008 B2
7509738 Adams Mar 2009 B2
7569174 Ruatta Aug 2009 B2
7713048 Perret May 2010 B2
7820241 Perret Oct 2010 B2
8137609 Mcalea Mar 2012 B2
8199787 Deri Jun 2012 B2
8514475 Deri Aug 2013 B2
8525943 Burgess Sep 2013 B2
8568646 Wang Oct 2013 B2
8666142 Shkolnik Mar 2014 B2
8784720 Oberhofer Jul 2014 B2
8801418 El-siblani Aug 2014 B2
8815143 John Aug 2014 B2
8902497 Erlandson Dec 2014 B2
8982313 Escuti Mar 2015 B2
9114478 Scott Aug 2015 B2
9136668 Bayramian Sep 2015 B2
9172208 Dawson Oct 2015 B1
9186847 Fruth Nov 2015 B2
9192056 Rubenchik Nov 2015 B2
9283593 Bruck Mar 2016 B2
9308583 El-dasher Apr 2016 B2
9331452 Bayramian May 2016 B2
9522426 Das Dec 2016 B2
9573193 Buller Feb 2017 B2
9776282 Subramanian Oct 2017 B2
9815139 Bruck Nov 2017 B2
9855625 El-dasher Jan 2018 B2
9943933 Xu Apr 2018 B2
9962767 Buller May 2018 B2
10041171 She Aug 2018 B2
10166603 Kawada Jan 2019 B2
10166751 Kramer Jan 2019 B2
10195692 Rockstroh Feb 2019 B2
10195693 Buller Feb 2019 B2
10279598 Deppe May 2019 B2
10328685 Jones Jun 2019 B2
10335901 Ferrar Jul 2019 B2
20020015654 Das Feb 2002 A1
20020090313 Wang Jul 2002 A1
20020149137 Jang Oct 2002 A1
20030052105 Nagano Mar 2003 A1
20050083498 Jeng Apr 2005 A1
20060249485 Partanen Nov 2006 A1
20070122560 Adams May 2007 A1
20080262659 Huskamp Oct 2008 A1
20090020901 Schillen Jan 2009 A1
20090206065 Kruth Aug 2009 A1
20090221422 Miller Sep 2009 A1
20100089881 Bruland Apr 2010 A1
20100176539 Higashi Jul 2010 A1
20110019705 Adams Jan 2011 A1
20110033887 Fang Feb 2011 A1
20110278269 Gold Nov 2011 A1
20120039565 Klein Feb 2012 A1
20130102447 Strong Apr 2013 A1
20130112672 Keremes May 2013 A1
20130136868 Bruck May 2013 A1
20130270750 Green Oct 2013 A1
20130271800 Kanugo Oct 2013 A1
20130300286 Ljungblad Nov 2013 A1
20130302533 Bruck Nov 2013 A1
20140085631 Lacour Mar 2014 A1
20140154088 Etter Jun 2014 A1
20140252687 El-dasher Sep 2014 A1
20140263209 Burris Sep 2014 A1
20140271965 Ferrar Sep 2014 A1
20140367894 Kramer Dec 2014 A1
20150034604 Subramanian Feb 2015 A1
20150132173 Bruck May 2015 A1
20150165556 Jones Jun 2015 A1
20150211083 Gabilondo Jul 2015 A1
20150273631 Kenney Oct 2015 A1
20150273632 Chen Oct 2015 A1
20150283612 Maeda Oct 2015 A1
20150283614 Wu Oct 2015 A1
20150311064 Stuart Oct 2015 A1
20150321217 Nardi Nov 2015 A1
20150321253 Espinal Nov 2015 A1
20150343664 Liu Dec 2015 A1
20150360418 Shah Dec 2015 A1
20150367573 Okazaki Dec 2015 A1
20150375456 Cheverton Dec 2015 A1
20160001401 Dimter Jan 2016 A1
20160067923 James Mar 2016 A1
20160082662 Majer Mar 2016 A1
20160114432 Ferrar Apr 2016 A1
20160175935 Ladewig Jun 2016 A1
20160207147 Van Hassel Jul 2016 A1
20160236279 Ashton Aug 2016 A1
20160243638 Berube Aug 2016 A1
20160243652 El-dasher Aug 2016 A1
20160256926 Ruppert Sep 2016 A1
20160279707 Mattes Sep 2016 A1
20160322777 Zediker Nov 2016 A1
20160368052 Jakimov Dec 2016 A1
20170120332 DeMuth et al. May 2017 A1
20170182556 Ramaswamy Jun 2017 A1
20170182558 Shimizu Jun 2017 A1
20170239719 Buller et al. Aug 2017 A1
20180065209 Foret Mar 2018 A1
20180281236 Elgar Oct 2018 A1
20180281237 Frechman et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180290380 Rehrig et al. Oct 2018 A1
20200038955 Jeffries Feb 2020 A1
20210114109 Pauzon Apr 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (27)
Number Date Country
1593817 Mar 2005 CN
105829013 Aug 2016 CN
102013205029 Sep 2014 DE
0402944 Dec 1990 EP
2875897 May 2015 EP
2926979 Oct 2015 EP
2964418 May 2019 EP
2453945 Apr 2009 GB
5933512 Jun 2016 JP
WO2012151262 Nov 2012 WO
WO2014199134 Dec 2014 WO
WO2014199149 Dec 2014 WO
WO2014199150 Dec 2014 WO
WO2014074954 Jan 2015 WO
WO2015003804 Jan 2015 WO
WO2015017077 Feb 2015 WO
WO2015108991 Jul 2015 WO
WO2015120168 Aug 2015 WO
WO2015191257 Dec 2015 WO
WO2015134075 Jan 2016 WO
WO2016071265 May 2016 WO
WO2016079496 Jun 2016 WO
WO2016110440 Jul 2016 WO
WO2016201309 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2017015217 Jan 2017 WO
WO 2017079091 May 2017 WO
WO2018087218 May 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Ly et al., Metal vapor micro-jet controls material redistribution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Scientific reports, Jun. 2017.
Zhirnov et al. Evaporation-induced gas-phase flows at selective laser melting. Applied Physics A, Feb. 2018.
Khairallah et al. Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Materialia, Apr. 2016.
“Metal vapor micro-jet controls material redistribution in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing”, Sonny Ly, et.al., □ 1-12 N, ((Scientific Reports)).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200189038 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62779978 Dec 2018 US