Additive manufacturing devices produce three-dimensional (3D) objects by building up layers of material. Some additive manufacturing devices are referred to as “3D printing devices” because they use inkjet or other printing technology to apply some of the manufacturing materials. 3D printing devices and other additive manufacturing devices make it possible to convert a computer-aided design (CAD) model or other digital representation of an object directly into the physical object.
The accompanying drawings illustrate various examples of the principles described herein and are part of the specification. The illustrated examples are provided for illustration, and do not limit the scope of the claims.
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and the size of some parts may be exaggerated to more clearly illustrate the example shown. Moreover, the drawings provide examples and/or implementations consistent with the description; however, the description is not limited to the examples and/or implementations provided in the drawings.
Additive manufacturing devices make a three-dimensional (3D) object through the solidification of layers of a build material on a bed within the device. Additive manufacturing devices make objects based on data in a 3D model of the object generated, for example, with a computer-aided drafting (CAD) computer program product. The model data is processed into slices, each slice defining portions of a layer of build material that is to be solidified.
In one example, to form the 3D object a build material, which may be powder, is deposited on a bed. A fusing agent is then dispensed onto portions of the layer of build material that are to be fused to form a layer of the 3D object. The system that carries out this type of additive manufacturing may be referred to as a powder and fusing agent based system. The fusing agent disposed in the desired pattern increases the energy absorption of the underlying layer of build material on which the agent is disposed. The build material is then exposed to energy such as electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic radiation may include infrared light, laser light, or other suitable electromagnetic radiation. Due to the increased heat absorption properties imparted by the fusing agent, those portions of the build material that have the fusing agent disposed thereon heat to a temperature greater than the fusing temperature for the build material.
Accordingly, as energy is applied to a surface of the build material the build material that has received the fusing agent, and therefore has increased energy absorption characteristics, fuses while that portion of the build material that has not received the fusing agent remains in powder form. Those portions of the build material that receive the agent and thus have increased heat absorption properties may be referred to as fused portions. By comparison, the applied heat is not so great so as to increase the heat of the portions of the build material that are free of the agent to this fusing temperature. Those portions of the build material that do not receive the agent and thus do not have increased heat absorption properties may be referred to as unfused portions.
Accordingly, a predetermined amount of heat is applied to an entire bed of build material, the portions of the build material that receive the fusing agent, due to the increased heat absorption properties imparted by the fusing agent, fuse and form the object while the unfused portions of the build material are unaffected, i.e., not fused, in the presence of such application of thermal energy. This process is repeated in a layer-wise fashion to generate a 3D object. The unfused portions of material can then be separated from the fused portions, and the unfused portions recycled for subsequent 3D printing operations.
While specific reference is made to one type of additive manufacturing process, the principles described herein may apply to other types of additive manufacturing processes. For example in another system, the build material may be loosely held together by the fusing agent in the additive manufacturing device and a final fusing may be done externally after the part is assembled.
While such additive manufacturing devices and systems allow for simplified 3D printing, some characteristics impede their more complete implementation. For example, in some scenarios, foreign particles may enter the ejection chamber. Some of these foreign particles may be of sufficient size, be present in sufficient quantities, or have other attributes that negatively affect the operation of the nozzles in the agent distributor.
For example, in an additive manufacturing operation, particulate matter from a powder-based building volume could enter the ejection chamber of the nozzle that dispenses the fusing agent or another fabrication agent. For example, the ejection of the fabrication agent may be done with sufficient velocity to dislodge particulate matter from the build area. The dislodged particulate matter could enter and clog the nozzle, leading to irregular fluid deposition, or may inhibit fluid deposition altogether. Moreover, in some cases, the agent distributor moves perpendicular to the ejected fluid. That is, fluid may be ejected downward in a y-direction and the agent distributor may translate along an x-plane. In this example, when the nozzles on the agent distributor are densely populated, entrained air from fluid ejection interfaces with the natural slipstream of air generated above the substrate. The interface of these different airstreams creates vortices that flow upward in a recirculation pattern. These vortices provide energy to powder particles suspended above the build unit. These particles, being light, may drift up into, and block the nozzle openings.
In other examples, these vortices cause the fabrication agent itself to rise and potentially clog the nozzle openings. Even further, in some cases, the fabrication agent and/or particulate matter may not enter the nozzles, but be deposited on the fluidic ejection die. Then, cleaning components such as a wiper may wipe any fabrication agent and/or particulate matter on the fluidic ejection die into the nozzle openings. Such blocked nozzles obviously impact the operation, and efficacy of subsequent ejection actions.
The clogging of the nozzle orifice may even damage the ejector. For example, the fluid in a nozzle serves to cool the ejector following heating and vaporization of a fluid bubble. If the nozzle orifice is clogged, this may impact the draw of fluid from the reservoir into the firing chamber, thus exposing the ejector to air for a longer period of time. This increased air exposure can lead to premature failure of the ejector and can further degrade fluid ejection performance. That is, the clogged nozzle will be over-heated if no fluid is refilled into the firing chamber to cool the ejector. This decreases the reliability of the nozzle, and may result in failure of the nozzle.
The interaction of these two airflows can also impact 3D print quality. For example, the vortices may alter the fluid path from the additive manufacturing device to the substrate thus resulting in less accurate fluid deposition and less accurate additive manufacturing.
Accordingly, the present specification describes devices and systems for preventing the formation of vortices sufficiently large to cause damage to components and impact print quality. Specifically, the present specification describes a fluidic ejection die that includes a number of nozzles. The nozzles are arranged along a die width and a die length. The nozzles are grouped with a set of neighboring nozzles being adjacent along a die length. In one example, the set of neighboring nozzle may be an angled column. In this example, adjacent neighboring nozzles have different die width positions than one another. For example, the neighboring nozzles may be angled, or non-orthogonal to the die width. Having such a non-orthogonal array alters the airstreams that result from fluidic ejection. The altered airstreams interact less with the slipstream formed by movement of the agent distributor such that the vortices previously described are less prominent. As such, the fabrication agent and/or particulate matter is less likely to rise above the surface of the powder-build material and thus is less likely to enter, and potentially block, the nozzles of the fluidic ejection die.
Specifically, the present specification describes an additive manufacturing module. The additive manufacturing module includes an agent distributor to selectively distribute a fabrication agent onto layers of build material. The agent distributor includes at least one fluidic ejection die. Each fluidic ejection die includes a plurality of nozzles arranged along a die length and a die width. The plurality of nozzles are arranged such that, for each set of neighboring nozzles, a respective subset of each set of neighboring nozzles are positioned at different die width positions along the width of the fluidic ejection die. For each respective nozzle of the plurality of nozzles, the fluidic ejection die includes a respective ejection chamber fluidically coupled to the respective nozzle. For each respective ejection chamber, at least one respective fluid feed hole is fluidically coupled to the respective ejection chamber.
The present specification also describes an additive manufacturing device. The additive manufacturing device includes a build material distributor to successively deposit layers of build material into a build area and an agent distributor to selectively distribute a fabrication agent onto the layers of build material. The agent distributor includes a thermal fluidic ejection die. The thermal fluidic ejection die includes a plurality of nozzles arranged into angled columns along a die length. The angled columns are distributed across a width of the fluidic ejection die and are arranged such that each angled column is non-orthogonal to a die width. For each respective nozzle of the plurality of nozzles, a respective ejection chamber is fluidically coupled to the respective nozzle and for each respective ejection chamber, at least one respective fluid feed hole is fluidically coupled to the respective ejection chamber. In this example, adjacent nozzles within an angled column have a pitch less than an area covered by an output of a nozzle.
The present specification also describes an additive manufacturing system. The system includes a bed to contain a volume of build material and a build material distributor to successively deposit layers of build material into a build area. The system also includes an agent distributor to selectively distribute a fabrication agent onto the layers of build material. The agent distributor includes a fluidic ejection die. The fluidic ejection die includes a plurality of nozzles arranged into angled columns along a die length. The angled columns are distributed across a width of the fluidic ejection die and are arranged such that, each angled column is non-orthogonal to a die width. For each respective nozzle of the plurality of nozzles, a respective ejection chamber is fluidically coupled to the respective nozzle and for each respective ejection chamber, at least one respective fluid feed hole is fluidically coupled to the respective ejection chamber. In this example, adjacent nozzles within an angled column have a pitch less than an area covered by an output of a nozzle.
In summary, using such an additive manufacturing module 1) spreads air flow resulting from fluid ejection and/or drops in flight more evenly in multiple directions; 2) reduces shear forces in the vicinity of the build area; 3) prevents particle entry into the fluidic ejection nozzles; 4) improves ejection accuracy, and 5) improves additive manufacturing device life.
As used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “nozzle” refers to an individual component of a fluid ejection die that dispenses fluid onto a surface. The nozzle includes at least a firing chamber, an ejector, and a shared nozzle orifice.
Moreover, as used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “set of neighboring nozzles” refers to a grouping of adjacent nozzles along a length of the fluidic ejection die. For example, any number of nozzles in an angled column is one example of a set of neighboring nozzles.
Still further, as used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “fabrication agent” refers to any number of agents that are deposited and includes for example a fusing agent, an inhibitor agent, a binding agent, a coloring agent, and/or a material delivery agent. A material delivery agent revers to a fluid carrier that includes suspended particles of at least one material used in the additive manufacturing process.
Still further, as used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “pitch spacing” refers to a nozzle-to-nozzle spacing between columnar nozzles.
Turning now to the figures,
Additional layers may be formed and the operations described above may be performed for each layer to thereby generate a three-dimensional object. Sequentially layering and fusing portions of layers of build material on top of previous layers may facilitate generation of the three-dimensional object. The layer-by-layer formation of a three-dimensional object may be referred to as a layer-wise additive manufacturing process.
In examples described herein, a build material may include a powder-based build material, where the powder-based build material may include wet and/or dry powder-based materials, particulate materials, and/or granular materials. In some examples, the build material may be a weak light absorbing polymer. In some examples, the build material may be a thermoplastic. Furthermore, as described herein, the functional agent may include liquids that may facilitate fusing of build material when energy is applied. The fusing agent may be a light absorbing liquid, an infrared or near infrared absorbing liquid, such as a pigment colorant.
To facilitate the deposition of the fusing agent, the additive manufacturing module (100) includes at least one agent distributor (102). An agent distributor (102) includes at least one fluidic ejection die (104) that includes a plurality of nozzles (106) to distribute a fusing agent onto the layers of build material. The agent distributor (102) selectively distributes an agent on a build layer in the build area concurrent with movement of the building area and/or a scanning carriage to which the additive manufacturing module (100) is affixed. The agent distributor (102), and more particularly the fluidic ejection die (104) includes nozzles (106) through which the fusing agent is selectively ejected. The nozzles (106) are a component of a fluidic ejection device which includes ejection chambers (110) and a fluid feed hole (112). In one example, fluidic ejection devices that are used in inkjet printing devices may be used within the fluidic ejection die (104).
While specific mention is made to an agent distributor (102) that distribute fusing agent, the agent distributor (102) may distribute any type of fabrication agent such as an inhibitor agent, binding agent, coloring agent, and/or material delivery agent.
The fluid ejection device includes a number of components for depositing a fluid onto a surface, which components may rely on thermal energy to operate. For example, the fluidic ejection device may include an ejector to eject fluid from the ejection chamber onto the surface. The ejector may be a thermal resistor. As the thermal resistor heats up in response to an applied energy, such as a supplied voltage pulse. As the thermal resistor heats up, a portion of the fluid in the ejection chamber vaporizes to form a bubble. This bubble pushes fluid out the nozzle and onto the surface. As the vaporized fluid bubble collapses, a negative pressure within the ejection chamber draws fluid into the ejection chamber from the fluid supply, and the process repeats. This system is referred to as a thermal inkjet system. In other words, the fluidic ejection die (104) includes a plurality of nozzles (106), with each respective nozzle (106) corresponding to a respective ejection chamber (110) to hold fluid to be ejected through the nozzle (106) and for each ejection chamber (110) a respective fluid feed hole (112) that fluidically couples the respective ejection chamber (110) to a fluid supply.
Returning to the fluidic ejection die (104). The fluidic ejection die (104) includes a plurality of nozzles (106) arranged along a die length and a die width. In the example depicted in
The nozzles (106) may be grouped into a set (108) of neighboring nozzles (106). For example, a set (108) of neighboring nozzles (106) may be any grouping of nozzles (106) in a particular angled column. For each set (108) of neighboring nozzles (106) a respective subset of that set may have different die widths positions along a die width. That is, a first nozzle (106) in the set may have a certain die width position, as measured from a point of reference such as a left hand side and a second nozzle (106) in the set (108) may have a die width position, measured from the same point of reference, which is different than the first. In this example, the subset may be any number of nozzles (106). For example, the set (108) of neighboring nozzles (106) may include at least three nozzles (106), and the subset may include a single nozzle (106).
Thus in summary, the arrangement of nozzles (106) on the fluidic ejection die (108) is in a non-rectangular, or non-square pattern. As one specific example, the set of neighboring nozzles (108) may be angled columns of nozzles (106) with each angled column having a non-orthogonal angle relative to the die width, which die width is indicated by the arrow (116). However, other configurations are possible with different adjacent nozzles (106) within the set (108) having different die width positions. As depicted in
Arranging the nozzles (106) in such a non-orthogonal orientation reduces the air vortices that can affect fluid deposition and additive manufacturing device operation. For example, the fluidic ejection die (104) may move across a build area in a direction indicated by the arrow (130). When nozzles (106) have the same die width position along a die length, the airstreams resultant from fluid deposition aggregate and increase in strength and thus have a greater interaction with a slipstream over the surface of the substrate so as to create vortices which can impact additive manufacturing device operation and fluidic ejection. However, by staggering the nozzles (106) as described herein, the airstreams resultant from fluid deposition by each nozzle (106) interact to a much smaller degree, thus avoiding the increased airstream. The reduced airstream does not react as strongly with the airstream over the substrate surface thus preventing the formation of vortices to the degree that may interfere with fluidic ejection operations.
As depicted in
While particular reference is made to the agent distributor (102) and build material distributor (216) moving relative to the build area, in some examples the build area may move and the agent distributor (102) and build material distributor (216) may remain stationary.
The additive manufacturing system (318) includes the build material distributor (216) as described above to successively deposit layers of the build material in the build area (320). While
The additive manufacturing system (318) includes the agent distributor (102) as described above which deposits a fusing agent or other fabrication agent on build material on the bed (322). As described above, the agent distributor (102) includes at least one fluidic ejection die (104) that includes nozzles (106). In one example, the fluidic ejection devices that include the nozzles (106) are inkjet printing devices. In this example, the fabrication agent may be a printing liquid. In other examples, an agent distributor (102) may include other types of fluidic ejection devices that selectively eject small volumes of liquid.
The agent distributor (102) includes at least one fluidic ejection die (104-1) arranged generally end-to-end with other fluidic ejection die (104-2) along a width of the agent distributor (102). In such examples, the width of the agent distributor (102) corresponds to a dimension of the build area (320). The agent distributor (102) selectively distributes an agent on a build layer in the build area (320). As noted above, in some examples the bed (322) translates in a horizontal direction to allow placement of the fabrication agent in a desired pattern and in other examples the agent distributor (102)/build material distributor (216) translate in the horizontal direction. The bed (322) may also move in a vertical direction as successive layers of build material are deposited into the build area (320). That is, as one layer of build material is deposited and fabrication agent disposed thereon, the bed (322) may move downward vertically such that a subsequent layer of build material can be deposited and selectively hardened.
The additive manufacturing system (318) may include at least one heater (324) to selectively fuse portions of the build material to form an object via the application of heat to the build material. A heater (324) may be any component that applies thermal energy. Examples of heaters (324) include infrared lamps, visible halogen lamps, resistive heaters, light emitting diodes LEDs, and lasers. As described above, build material may include a fusible build material that fuses together once a fusing temperature is reached. Accordingly, the heater (324) may apply thermal energy to the build material so as to heat portions of the build material past this fusing temperature. Those portions that are heated past the fusing temperature have a fusing agent disposed thereon and are formed in the pattern of the 3D object to be printed. The fusing agent increases the absorption rate of that portion of the build material. Thus, a heater (324) may apply an amount of energy such that those portions with an increased absorption rate reach a temperature greater than the fusing temperature while those portions that do not have the increased absorption rate to not reach a temperature greater than the fusing temperature.
In such a configuration, adjacent nozzles (106) within a set (108) have a first offset (428) along a die length, and a second offset (426) along a die width. In some examples, this offset may be described as a difference in die position. For example, the first offset (428) may be described as a difference in die length position of nozzles (106) within the set (108) and the second offset (426) may be described as a difference in die width position of nozzles (106) within the set (108). As depicted in
In addition to a spacing between nozzles (106) in a set (108), each set (108) may be spaced from adjacent sets (108). For example, each set (108) may have a set offset (432) of 8/1200 of an inch from each other.
However, when the nozzles (106-2) are offset as depicted in
In summary, using such an additive manufacturing module 1) spreads air flow resulting from fluid dejection and/or drops in flight more evenly in multiple directions; 2) reduces the shear force in the vicinity of the build area; 3) prevents particle entry into the fluidic ejection nozzles; 4) improves ejection accuracy, and 5) improves additive manufacturing device life.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/022036 | 3/12/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/177578 | 9/19/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5677718 | Crawford | Oct 1997 | A |
6024440 | Murthy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6146567 | Sachs | Nov 2000 | A |
6345879 | Fisher | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357855 | Kerekes | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6450614 | Scheffelin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7625080 | Hess | Dec 2009 | B2 |
9315019 | Govyadinov | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9561666 | Govyadinov | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9776422 | Govyadinov | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10369790 | Choy | Aug 2019 | B2 |
11123917 | Gardiner | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20020051039 | Moynihan | May 2002 | A1 |
20050140722 | Shibata | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060103691 | Dietl | May 2006 | A1 |
20060221125 | Konno | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070132815 | Sakaida | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070291078 | Drury | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110102509 | Sharan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110187773 | Kusakari | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120160925 | Hoisington | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140291886 | Mark | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150174824 | Gifford et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150298394 | Sheinman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160325498 | Gelbart | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170129252 | Barnett et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170355190 | Mu | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180056582 | Matusik | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180126650 | Murphree | May 2018 | A1 |
20180222203 | Przybyla | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1709699 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1980794 | Jun 2007 | CN |
106853683 | Jun 2017 | CN |
3710228 | Sep 2020 | EP |
2004291625 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005088548 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006272880 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2011520665 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2014510649 | May 2014 | JP |
2015189035 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2018502738 | Feb 2018 | JP |
2018034465 | Mar 2018 | JP |
2019006050 | Jan 2019 | JP |
WO2012152510 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2016030405 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2017100853 | Jun 2017 | WO |
2017152142 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017196323 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2019177578 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Grabchenko, et al. Integrated Generative Technologies. Kharkov. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210323228 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |