The present invention is generally related to programming graphics computer systems.
Recent advances in computer performance have enabled graphic systems to provide more realistic graphical images using personal computers, home video game computers, handheld devices, and the like. In such graphic systems, a number of procedures are executed to “render” or draw graphic primitives to the screen of the system. A “graphic primitive” is a basic component of a graphic picture, such as a point, line, polygon, or the like. Rendered images are formed with combinations of these graphic primitives. Many procedures may be utilized to perform 3-D graphics rendering.
Specialized graphics processing units (e.g., GPUs, etc.) have been developed to optimize the computations required in executing the graphics rendering procedures. The GPUs are configured for high-speed operation and typically incorporate one or more rendering pipelines. Each pipeline includes a number of hardware-based functional units that are optimized for high-speed execution of graphics instructions/data. Generally, the instructions/data are fed into the front end of the pipeline and the computed results emerge at the back end of the pipeline. The hardware-based functional units, cache memories, firmware, and the like, of the GPU are optimized to operate on the low-level graphics primitives and produce real-time rendered 3-D images.
In modern real-time 3-D graphics rendering, the functional units of the GPU need to be programmed in order to properly execute many of the more refined pixel shading techniques. These techniques require, for example, the blending of colors into a pixel in accordance with factors in a rendered scene which affect the nature of its appearance to an observer. Such factors include, for example, fogginess, reflections, light sources, and the like. In general, several graphics rendering programs (e.g., small specialized programs that are executed by the functional units of the GPU) influence a given pixel's color in a 3-D scene. Such graphics rendering programs are commonly referred to as shader programs, or simply shaders. In more modern systems, some types of shaders can be used to alter the actual geometry of a 3-D scene (e.g., Vertex shaders) and other primitive attributes.
In a typical GPU architecture, each of the GPU's functional units is associated with a low level, low latency internal memory (e.g., register set, etc.) for storing instructions that programmed the architecture for processing the primitives. The instructions typically comprise a shader programs and the like. The instructions are loaded into their intended GPU functional units by propagating them through the pipeline. As the instructions are passed through the pipeline, when they reach their intended functional unit, that functional unit will recognize its intended instructions and store them within its internal registers.
Prior to being loaded into the GPU, the instructions are typically stored in system memory. Because the much larger size of the system memory, a large number of shader programs can be stored there. A number of different graphics processing programs (e.g., shader programs, fragment programs, etc.) can reside in system memory. The programs can each be tailored to perform a specific task or accomplish a specific result. In this manner, the graphics processing programs stored in system memory act as a library, with each of a number of shader programs configured to accomplish a different specific function. For example, depending upon the specifics of a given 3-D rendering scene, specific shader programs can be chosen from the library and loaded into the GPU to accomplish a specialized customized result.
The graphics processing programs, shader programs, and the like are transferred from system memory to the GPU through a DMA (direct memory access) operation. This allows GPU to selectively pull in the specific programs it needs. The GPU can assemble an overall graphics processing program, shader, etc. by selecting two or more of the graphics programs in system memory and DMA transferring them into the GPU.
There are problems with conventional GPU architectures in selectively assembling more complex graphics programs, shader programs, or the like from multiple subprograms. In general, it is advantageous to link two or more graphics programs together in order to implement more complex or more feature filled render processing. A problem exists however, in that in order to link multiple graphics processing programs together, the addressing schemes of the programs need to properly refer to GPU memory such that the two programs execute as intended. For example, in a case where two shader programs are linked to form a longer shader routine, the first shader address mechanism needs to correctly reference the second shader address mechanism. Additionally, both shader address mechanisms need to properly and coherently referred to the specific GPU functional units and/or registers in which they will be stored. This can involve quite a bit of overhead in those cases where there are many different graphics programs stored in system memory and a given application wants to be able to link multiple programs in a number of different orders, combinations, total lengths, and the like.
The programs in system memory have no way of knowing the order in which they will be combined, the number of them there will be in any given combination, or whether they will be combined at all. Due to the real time rendering requirements, the configurations of the combinations need to be determined on-the-fly, and need to be implemented as rapidly as possible in order to maintain acceptable frame rates. It is still desirable to DMA transfer the programs from the system memory to the GPU (e.g., on an as needed basis). In order to facilitate DMA transfers, the desired programs need to be modified to properly point to their respective correct addresses and to properly order themselves for execution with the various functional units of the GPU. Unfortunately, this results in a large number of read-modify-write operations (e.g., R-M-W), where the program must be read, their address mechanisms altered such that the individual instructions comprising each program correctly match their intended functional units and registers, and written back to system memory. Only after the required R-M-W operations have been completed can the desired programs be DMA transferred into the GPU. This results in a large amount of undesirable processor overhead.
The increased overhead proves especially problematic with the ability of prior art 3-D rendering architectures to scale to handle the increasingly complex 3-D scenes of today's applications. Scenes now commonly contain hundreds of programs each consisting of up to hundreds of instructions. Thus, a need exists for program loading process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased processor overhead.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for loading graphics rendering programs that can scale as graphics application needs require without incurring penalties such as excessive data transfer overhead.
In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as method for loading a shader program from system memory into GPU memory. The method includes accessing the shader program in system memory of a computer system. The GPU then performs a DMA transfer of the shader program from system memory into GPU memory. The DMA transfer is implemented such that the shader program is loaded into GPU memory in an address-independent manner. In one embodiment, the shader program stored in system memory does not include an explicit address (e.g., does not include an address that references a storage location within the GPU memory).
In one embodiment, multiple shader programs reside in system memory of the computer system. Two or more of the shader programs are accessed and respective DMA transfers of the shader programs from system memory into GPU memory are performed such that each of the shader programs are loaded into GPU memory in an address-independent manner. Each of the shader programs are linked for sequential execution (e.g., where two or more shader programs are linked to implement more complex rendering, etc.) by the GPU.
In one embodiment, an offset value can be written into the GPU memory (e.g., by the graphics driver) to indicate an address where the first shader program is to be stored. Subsequently, from the first instruction of the first shader program to a last instruction of the last of the shader program, each instruction is loaded sequentially from the offset value address to successively incremented addresses of the GPU memory. The sequential loading of each instruction from the offset value can link each of the shader programs for sequential execution by the GPU (e.g., multiple shader programs that implement more complex rendering, etc.).
In this manner, embodiments of the present invention implement a program loading process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased processor overhead. Since the shader programs do not include explicit addresses to GPU memory, they can be DMA transferred from system memory into GPU memory, for example, on an as needed basis, without requiring any explicit address Read-modify-write updating, thereby greatly reducing program loading overhead.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments of the present invention.
Notation and Nomenclature:
Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “accessing” or “executing” or “storing” or “rendering” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system (e.g., computer system 100 of
Computer System Platform:
It should be appreciated that the GPU 110 can be implemented as a discrete component, a discrete graphics card designed to couple to the computer system 100 via a connector (e.g., AGP slot, PCI-Express slot, etc.), a discrete integrated circuit die (e.g., mounted directly on a motherboard), or as an integrated GPU included within the integrated circuit die of a computer system chipset component (not shown), or within the integrated circuit die of a PSOC (programmable system-on-a-chip). Additionally, a local graphics memory 114 can be included for the GPU 110 for high bandwidth graphics data storage.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for loading graphics rendering programs that can scale as graphics application needs require without incurring penalties such as excessive data transfer overhead. In one embodiment, the present invention is implemented as a computer implemented method (e.g., system 100 of
The
Each of the instruction block images 201-204 comprise a graphics rendering program that programs the hardware components of, for example, a functional unit 222 (e.g., a raster unit, etc.) to perform a graphics rendering operation. A typical instruction block image (e.g., instruction block image 201) comprises a number of instructions. The instruction block images are stored in system memory 115 and are maintained there until needed by a graphics application executing on the GPU 110. The instructions that comprise a given instruction block image are usually specifically tailored for use with a specific functional unit of the pipeline 215. Each of the functional units 221-224 can have multiple designated instruction block images within the system memory 115. Thus, an instruction block image can be a shader program (e.g., Vertex shader, texture shader, geometry shader, etc.), or the like. Although the discussions which follow often use the term “shader” or “shader program”, it should be understood that this term can refer to a graphics rendering program other than a shader program (e.g., set up, transform and lighting, rasterization, etc.).
A graphics driver executing on the CPU 101 functions by configuring and programming the GPU 110 for operation. The programming occurs in response to the particular requirements of a given graphics rendering application (e.g., real-time 3-D rendering application) executing on the computer system 100. In support of a typical application, the graphics driver causes a certain number of the instruction block images 201-204 to be DMA transferred into the pipeline 215 when needed to program the functional units 221-224. The DMA unit 230 is configured to implement the DMA transfers. The DMA unit 230 is typically a component included within the GPU 110.
During a programming operation, selected instruction block images are DMA transferred into the pipeline 215. The instructions comprising each shader program then propagate “down” the pipeline 215 until they reach their intended functional unit. Each of the functional units 221-224 include hardware which recognizes instructions intended for itself. For example, when a functional unit near the “top” of the pipeline 215 (e.g., functional unit 221) recognizes shader program instructions intended for itself, it loads the instructions into its coupled instruction memory (e.g., shown in
The
The hardware of a given functional unit accesses its instruction unit table to execute any of a number of different shader programs that may be stored therein. As described above, these instructions program the hardware components of the particular functional unit. This enables that functional unit to operate as intended on the data that subsequently flows down the pipeline 215.
In a typical programming operation, as described above, the instruction block images are DMA transferred from system memory 115 into instruction unit tables (e.g., GPU memory) such that each of the shader programs are loaded into instruction unit tables in an address-independent manner, and such that the shader programs are linked for sequential execution. As used herein, the term “address independent” refers to the fact that the contents of the shader programs do not depend on where in the instruction register tables (e.g., register address) they will be loaded. For example, in a case where two shader programs are combined to implement a specific rendering routine, the instructions comprising the first shader program can be loaded in an upper portion of the instruction unit table 300 and the instructions comprising the second shader program can be loaded in successive portion of the unit table 300. Thus, for example, the first instruction of the first shader program can be loaded at register 0, and have its instructions sequentially loaded thereon to, for example, register 16, and the second shader program can have its first instruction loaded at register 17 and each subsequent instruction sequentially loaded thereon to, for example, register 23. Then, when the functional unit coupled to the instruction unit table 300 executes its rendering routine (e.g., to perform complex shading, etc.), it will execute the first instruction at register 0, and each subsequent instruction until it executes the last instruction at register 23.
In one embodiment, when shader programs are loaded into the instruction unit table 300, the shader programs are loaded in accordance with an offset value that is written into the instruction unit table 300. The offset value indicates the register at which the first instruction of the first shader program is to be stored. Thus, for example, in a case where three shader programs are to be stored within the instruction unit table 300, an offset value can be written to one of the registers of the table 300 indicating that designated register is to be the start location of the sequential instruction loading. This causes the first instruction of the first shader program to be loaded at the designated register, and each subsequent instruction of the first shader program, through the instructions of the second shader program, and to the last instruction of the third shader program to be sequentially loaded from the designated register onwards. In this manner, the destination addresses of the store operations are automatically incremented as each successive instruction is loaded into the table 300. In other words, each instruction is sequentially stored from the address indicated by the offset value to successively incremented addresses of the table 300 (e.g., GPU memory).
As described above, the instructions of the instruction unit table 300 are executed sequentially by the coupled functional unit. Thus, in keeping with the above described example where three shader programs are linked, the register addresses where the shader programs are stored sequentially extend from a first address (e.g., indicated by the offset value) to a last address (e.g., were the last instruction of the third shader is stored). The function unit executes the rendering routine from this first address through this last address.
The global register table 350 is configured to enable a plurality of offset values to be written into multiple instruction unit tables of the pipeline 215. This is implemented by accessing a global register (within the table 350) that aliases a plurality of memory locations of the GPU memory. For example, the global register table 350 can be configured to alias to each of the instruction unit tables (e.g., table 300) of each of the functional units 221-224 of the pipeline 215. This enables, for example, a common offset value to be written simultaneously to each of the instruction unit tables. In this manner, the plurality of memory locations aliased by the global register table 350 are configured such that data can be efficiently written to a corresponding plurality of functional units of the GPU.
As described above, the loading of each instruction sequentially from the address indicated by the offset value links each of the shader programs for sequential execution by the GPU. This attribute holds true irrespective of where within the system memory 115 the instruction block images corresponding to the shader programs were stored. Additionally, since the instructions comprising the shader programs do not have an actual address until they are stored within the table 300, the shader programs stored in system memory (e.g., the instruction block images) do not require explicit addresses. This aspect is depicted by the instruction block image 402 which, in accordance with embodiment of the present invention, does not have explicit addresses.
In contrast, in the prior art, the conventional instruction block image 401 has a specific address for each of the instructions comprising the instruction block. Each of the instructions has an address that references a corresponding register of a conventional GPU. These addresses are used by the conventional GPU to direct the instructions of the instruction block image to their correct storage location, and they must be each updated through time-consuming read-modify-write operations in order to implement valid combinations. Such explicit addresses are not necessary with the instruction block image 402.
In this manner, embodiments of the present invention implement a program loading process that can scale as graphics application needs require and provide added performance without incurring penalties such as increased processor overhead. Since the shader programs do not include explicit addresses to GPU memory, they can be DMA transferred from system memory into GPU memory, for example, on an as needed basis, without requiring any explicit address read-modify-write updating, thereby greatly reducing program loading overhead.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3091657 | Stuessel | May 1963 | A |
3614740 | Delagi et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3987291 | Gooding et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4101960 | Stokes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4541046 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4566005 | Apperley et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4748585 | Chiarulli et al. | May 1988 | A |
4897717 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4958303 | Assarpour et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965716 | Sweeney | Oct 1990 | A |
4965751 | Thayer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4985848 | Pfeiffer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5040109 | Bowhill et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047975 | Patti et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5175828 | Hall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179530 | Genusov et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197130 | Chen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5210834 | Zurawski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5263136 | DeAguiar et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5327369 | Ashkenazi | Jul 1994 | A |
5357623 | Megory-Cohen | Oct 1994 | A |
5375223 | Meyers et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5388206 | Poulton et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5388245 | Wong | Feb 1995 | A |
5418973 | Ellis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430841 | Tannenbaum et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430884 | Beard et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432905 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5517666 | Ohtani et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522080 | Harney | May 1996 | A |
5560030 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561808 | Kuma et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574944 | Stager | Nov 1996 | A |
5627988 | Oldfield | May 1997 | A |
5644753 | Ebrahim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649173 | Lentz | Jul 1997 | A |
5666169 | Ohki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682552 | Kuboki et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682554 | Harrell | Oct 1997 | A |
5706478 | Dye | Jan 1998 | A |
5754191 | Mills et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761476 | Martell | Jun 1998 | A |
5764243 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5784590 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784640 | Asghar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796974 | Goddard et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802574 | Atallah et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809524 | Singh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812147 | Van Hook et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835788 | Blumer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848254 | Hagersten | Dec 1998 | A |
5920352 | Inoue | Jul 1999 | A |
5925124 | Hilgendorf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940090 | Wilde | Aug 1999 | A |
5940858 | Green | Aug 1999 | A |
5949410 | Fung | Sep 1999 | A |
5950012 | Shiell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978838 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999199 | Larson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
6016474 | Kim et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041399 | Terada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049672 | Shiell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073158 | Nally et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092094 | Ireton | Jul 2000 | A |
6108766 | Hahn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112019 | Chamdani et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131152 | Ang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141740 | Mahalingaiah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144392 | Rogers | Nov 2000 | A |
6150610 | Sutton | Nov 2000 | A |
6189068 | Witt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192073 | Reader et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192458 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208361 | Gossett | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209078 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222552 | Haas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230254 | Senter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247094 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252610 | Hussain | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292886 | Makineni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301600 | Petro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314493 | Luick | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317819 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351808 | Joy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370617 | Lu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6437789 | Tidwell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438664 | McGrath et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480927 | Bauman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490654 | Wickeraad et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496902 | Faanes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499090 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6525737 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529201 | Ault et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6597357 | Thomas | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603481 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624818 | Mantor et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629188 | Minkin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631423 | Brown et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631463 | Floyd et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657635 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658447 | Cota-Robles | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674841 | Johns et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700581 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6700588 | MacInnis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715035 | Colglazier et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732242 | Hill et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6809732 | Zatz et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812929 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825843 | Allen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825848 | Fu et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6839062 | Aronson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862027 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891543 | Wyatt | May 2005 | B2 |
6915385 | Leasure et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6944744 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952214 | Naegle et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965982 | Nemawarkar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975324 | Valmiki et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976126 | Clegg et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978149 | Morelli et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978457 | Johl et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981106 | Bauman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985151 | Bastos et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7015909 | Morgan, III et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031330 | Bianchini, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032097 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035979 | Azevedo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7091979 | Donovan | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7148888 | Huang | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151544 | Emberling | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154500 | Heng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159212 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185178 | Barreh et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7202872 | Paltashev et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7260677 | Vartti et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7305540 | Trivedi et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7321787 | Kim | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7334110 | Faanes et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7369815 | Kang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373478 | Yamazaki | May 2008 | B2 |
7406698 | Richardson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412570 | Moll et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486290 | Kilgariff et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7487305 | Hill et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493452 | Eichenberger et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528843 | Kilgard et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7545381 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564460 | Boland et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7636087 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7750913 | Parenteau et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7777748 | Bakalash et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852341 | Rouet et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869835 | Zu | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8020169 | Yamasaki | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8411096 | Mahan et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8659601 | Mahan et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8698819 | Mahan et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
20010026647 | Morita | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020116595 | Morton | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130874 | Baldwin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020144061 | Faanes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194430 | Cho | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001847 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030003943 | Bajikar | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014457 | Desai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016217 | Vlachos et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016844 | Numaoka | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031258 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067473 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030172326 | Coffin, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188118 | Jackson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204673 | Venkumahanti et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204680 | Hardage, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227461 | Hux et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003370 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012597 | Zatz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073771 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073773 | Demjanenko | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103253 | Kamei et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040193837 | Devaney et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205326 | Sindagi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212730 | MacInnis et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215887 | Starke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221117 | Shelor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237074 | Aronson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263519 | Andrews et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050012759 | Valmiki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024369 | Xie | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030312 | Boyd et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050071722 | Biles | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088448 | Hussain et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050122330 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050239518 | D'Agostino et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262332 | Rappoport et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280652 | Hutchins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020843 | Frodsham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064517 | Oliver | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064547 | Kottapalli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103659 | Karandikar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060152509 | Heirich | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152519 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152520 | Gadre et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176308 | Karandikar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060176309 | Gadre et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060221076 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070076010 | Swamy et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070130444 | Mitu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070285427 | Morein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007559 | Kalaiah et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016327 | Menon et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077793 | Tan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080147993 | Kaneko | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080278509 | Washizu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090235051 | Codrescu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20120023149 | Kinsman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29606102 | Jun 1996 | DE |
07-101885 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H08-077347 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H08-153032 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-297605 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09-287217 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H09-325759 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-222476 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-190447 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-148695 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-022638 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2003-178294 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-252990 | Sep 2004 | JP |
100262453 | May 2000 | KR |
1998-018215 | Aug 2000 | KR |
413766 | Dec 2000 | TW |
436710 | May 2001 | TW |
442734 | Jun 2001 | TW |
Entry |
---|
McCool et al.; Shader metaprogramming; SIGGRAPH 2002; pp. 57-68. |
Tarditi et al.; Accelerator: using data parallelism to program GPUs for general-purpose uses; Dec. 2006; ACM; vol. 40, Issue 5; pp. 325-335. |
IBM TDB, Device Queue Management, vol. 31 Iss. 10, pp. 45-50, Mar. 1, 1989. |
Hamacher, V. Carl et al., Computer Organization, Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1984, pp. 1-9. |
Graham, Susan L. et al., Getting Up to Speed: The future of Supercomputing, the National Academies Press, 2005, glossary. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 102 and 338. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, pp. 305. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1988, pp. 273. |
Graf, Rudolf F., Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Howard W. Sams & Company, 1984, pp. 566. |
Wikipeida, definition of “subroutine”, published Nov. 29, 2003, four pages. |
Graston et al. (Software Pipelining Irregular Loops On the TMS320C6000 VLIW DSP Architecture); Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Languages, compilers and tools for embedded systems; pp. 138-144; Year of Publication: 2001. |
SearchStorage.com Definitions, “Pipeline Burst Cache,” Jul. 31, 2001, url: http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,sid5—gci214414,00.html. |
“Vertex Fog”; http://msdn.microsoft.corn/library/en-us/directx9—c/Vertex—fog.asp?frame=true; Mar. 27, 2006. |
“Anti-aliasing”; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-aliasing; Mar. 27, 2006. |
“Alpha Testing State”; http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/directx9—c/directx/graphics/programmingguide/GettingStarted/Direct3Kdevices/States/renderstates/alphatestingstate.asp; Mar. 25, 2005. |
Brown, Brian; “Data Structure And Number Systems”; 2000; http://www.ibilce.unesp.br/courseware/datas/data3.htm; 2000. |
Heirich; Optimal Automatic Mulit-pass Shader Partitioning by Dynamic Programming; Eurographics—Graphics Hardware (2005); Jul. 2005. |
Hutchins E., SC10: A Video Processor And Pixel-Shading GPU for Handheld Devices; presented at the Hot Chips conferences on Aug. 23, 2004. |
Wilson D., NVIDIA's Tiny 90nm G71 and G73: GeForce 7900 and 7600 Debut; at http://www.anandtech.com/show/1967/2; dated Sep. 3, 2006, retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
Woods J., Nvidia GeForce FX Preview, at http://www.tweak3d.net/reviews/nvidia/nv30preview/1.shtml; dated Nov. 18, 2002; retrieved Jun. 16, 2011. |
NVIDIA Corporation, Technical Brief: Transform and Lighting; dated 1999; month unknown. |
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online; Definition for “program”; retrieved Dec. 14, 2010. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Video Processor Having Scalar and Vector Components With Command FIFO for Passing Function Calls From Scalar to Vector”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,700, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Stream Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,599, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “Multidemnsional Datapath Processing in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,638, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “A Latency Tolerant System for Executing Video Processing Operations”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,875, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Gadre, S., Patent Application Entitled “Separately Schedulable Condition Codes For a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,793, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew, et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Programmable DMA Engine for Implementing Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,777, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled: “A Pipelined L2 Cache for Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,606, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled: “Command Acceleration in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,640, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled “A Configurable SIMD Engine in a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,393, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Karandikar, et al., Patent Application Entitled “Context Switching on a Video Processor Having a Scalar Execution Unit and a Vector Execution Unit”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,778, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Lew, et al., Patent Application Entitled “Multi Context Execution on a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,780, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Su, Z, et al., Patent Application Entitled: “State Machine Control for a Pipelined L2 Cache to Implement Memory Transfers for a Video Processor”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,119, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Kozyrakis, “A Media enhanced vector architecture for embedded memory systems,” Jul. 1999, http://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/techreports/ucb/text/CSD-99/1059.pdf. |
HPL-PD A Parameterized Research Approach—May 31, 2004 http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.trimaran.org/docs/5—hpl-pd.pdf. |
gDEBugger, graphicREMEDY, http://www.gremedy.com, Aug. 8, 2006. |
Duca et al., A Relational Debugging Engine for Graphics Pipeline, International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 453-463, ISSN:0730-0301. |
Parhami, Behrooz, Computer Arithmetic: Algorithms and Hardware Designs, Oxford University Press 2000, pp. 413-418, ISBN:0-19-512583-5. |
Karandikar et al., Patent Application Entitled A Pipelined L2 Cache for Memory Transfers for A Video Processor:, U.S. Appl. No. 11/267,606, filed Nov. 4, 2005. |
Espasa R et al: “Decoupled vector architectures”, High-Performance Computer Architecture, 1996. Proceedings., Second International Symposium on San Jose, CA, USA Feb. 3-7, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. SOC, US, Feb. 3, 1996, pp. 281-290, XP01 0162067. DOI: 10.11 09/HPCA, 1996.501193 ISBN: 978-0-8186-7237-8. |
Defintion of “Slot,” http://www.thefreedictionary.com/slot, Oct. 2, 2012. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Deveopler's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1997 p. 8-1. |
Intel, Intel Architecture Software Deveopler's Manual, vol. 1: Basic Architecture 1999 p. 8-1, 9-1. |
Intel, Intel Pentium III Xeon Processor at 500 and 550Mhz, Feb. 1999. |
Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), defintion of “video”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=video&action=Search, May 23, 2008. |
FOLDOC, definition of “frame buffer”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=frame+buffer&action=Search, Oct. 3, 1997. |
PCreview, article entitled “What is a Motherboard”, from www.pcreview.co.uk/articles/Hardware/What—is—a—Motherboard., Nov. 22, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “motherboard”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=motherboard&action=Search, Aug. 10, 2000. |
FOLDOC, definition of “separate compilation”, from foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=separate+compilation&action=Search, Feb. 19, 2005. |
FOLDOC, definition of “vector processor”, http://foldoc.org/, Sep. 11, 2003. |
Wikipedia, defintion of “vector processor”, http://en.wikipedia.org/, May 14, 2007. |
Fisher, Joseph A., Very Long Instruction Word Architecture and the ELI-512, ACM, 1993, pp. 140-150. |
FOLDOC (Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing), defintion of X86, Feb. 27, 2004. |
FOLDOC, definition of “superscalar,” http://foldoc.org/, Jun. 22, 2009. |
FOLDOC, definition of Pentium, Sep. 30, 2003. |
Wikipedia, definition of “scalar processor,” Apr. 4, 2009. |
Intel, Intel MMX Technology at a Glance, Jun. 1997. |
Intel, Pentium Processor Family Developer's Manual, 1997, pp. 2-13. |
Intel, Pentium processor with MMX Technology at 233Mhz Performance Brief, Jan. 1998, pp. 3 and 8. |
Wikipedia, entry page defining term “SIMD”, last modified Mar. 17, 2007. |
FOLDOC, Free Online Dictionary of Computing, defintion of SIMD, foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=simd&action=Search, Nov. 4, 1994. |
Definition of “queue” from Free on-Line Dictionary of Computing (FOLDOC), http://folddoc.org/index.cgi?query=queue&action=Search, May 15, 2007. |
Definition of “first-in first-out” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?query=fifo&action=Search, Dec. 6, 1999. |
Definition of “block” from FOLDOC, http://foldoc.org/index.cgi?block, Sep. 23, 2004. |
Quinnell, Richard A. “New DSP Architectures Go “Post-Harvard” for Higher Performance and Flexibility” Techonline; posted May 1, 2002. |
Wikipedia, definition of Multiplication, accessed from en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Multiplication&oldid=1890974, published Oct. 13, 2003. |
Rosenberg, Jerry M.; Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing & Telecommunications, 2nd edition; John Wiley & Sons, 1987, 4 pages. |