Numerous types of adhesive film dispensers are currently in use ranging from relatively simple single use dispensers as shown in Corbo, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,525 to devices used by bulk mailers of packages such as Clements U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,033.
The latter category of dispenser is characterized by a pistol grip handle having a bulky roll of tape above it and a dispensing mechanism, including cutting blade, jutting out at about 90° or greater from a plane which passes through the handle and centerline of the tape. This type of dispenser features a triangular orientation of tape, handle and cutting blade. Other examples of such “pistol grip” adhesive film dispensers are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,491,082; 6,478,067; 6,296,033; 6,257,298; 6,098,690; 5,954,916; 5,849,144; 5,456,790; 5,393,367; 5,110,401; 4,804,437; 4,818,329; 4,762,586 and other patents.
Pistol grip dispensers, however, are not ergonomic devices. They are typically top heavy with much of the weight in the forward part of the device, outside the axis of the handle. This tends to pull the device forward when held by applicator, adding to wrist and arm strain of the user. In addition, the angle of adhesive film application from pistol grip dispensers is awkward. More specifically, the pistol grip dispenser must be rotated through an arc of about 60–90° each time the adhesive film is applied to a surface. To cut the tape, the dispenser typically must be rotated another 30–60° to force the cutting blade into severing contact with the film or tape to be cut. See FIG. 1 and column 3, lines 60 et. seq. of U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,033.
Existing adhesive film dispensers can also inflict other harm on users, for example, cuts arising from user contact with the cutting blade. Several different approaches for limiting such harm appear in existing patents.
Among those approaches is that described in Clements U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,033 which discloses a removable guard formed from a pliable material which is removably attached to, and extends beyond, the cutting blade. The extended length of the guard beyond the outer edge of the cutting blade limits impact of the blade on objects and the user. (See FIG. 3 and column 3, lines 28–40). The Clements patent also discloses use of a less pliable guard which is scored along a bendline to form a resilient hinge (See column 3, lines 40–44). The guard is moved out of its guarded position over the serrated blade by the tape as it is drawn off the tape roll and toward contact with the blade. The tape pulls the shield away from the blade to facilitate the latter's penetration of the tape. (See FIG. 4 and column 3, lines 60, et seq.).
Another approach to shielding a user from the cutting edge of a tape dispenser is disclosed in Chen, et al. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,456,790 and 5,393,367. These patents disclose a rigid pivoted shield that is normally biased into a protective position over the cutting blade. The shield is pivoted out of its protective position when the tape dispenser is tilted to dispense tape, thereby allowing cutting engagement of the blade with the tape (See FIGS. 5–6 and column 4, lines 42–47 of the '790 patent).
Other patents approach the problem of sharp cutting blades with mechanisms that retract the blade until it is needed to cut the tape. In Chung, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,377, a hand held dispenser employs a mechanism which extends the blade when pressure is applied on a pivoting “wiper” extending from the body of the dispenser (See FIGS. 2–3 and column 4, lines 49 et seq.). A very similar arrangement for a retractable blade is disclosed in Tang, et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,849,144.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,329 issued Apr. 4, 1989 to Tutas, et al. discloses a rigid, spring-biased movable guard over a cutting blade mounted on a rotatable shaft which is normally spring biased to cover the blade but can be rotated out of its covering position when the dispenser is rotated into position to dispense tape (See FIGS. 2–3 and column 7, lines 2049).
Yet another approach to limiting contact with a dispenser blade is illustrated in commonly assigned U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/425,006 filed Nov. 9, 2002. This application describes a frame on which a roll of tape is rotatably mounted. A shield extending from the frame and parallel to the cutting blade minimizes user contact with the blade. The shield either extends beyond the edge of the blade or in close proximity thereto, thereby protecting the user.
Another issue with other adhesive film dispensers is the management of the film after it is cut. If the loose end of film, after it is cut from the roll, is not properly managed the sticky side of the tape can double over on itself with consequent detriment to future application of tape on surfaces to be taped. Or the loose end of the film or tape can rewind onto the tape roll before the dispenser can be used. One approach to management of loose ends of tape or film after being cut from the roll is multiple tabs surrounding the loose end of the tape as it is unwound. Suhr U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,720 discloses such tabs (reference number 40 in FIG. 2) whose function is described at column 1, lines 33–43. Guide rollers in FIG. 2 of Chen U.S. Pat. No. 6,152,398 are also designed to hold the loose end of tape in place so that it may be easily applied to the next article to be taped (column 2, lines 11–15).
The adhesive film dispenser of this application exhibits a substantially improved ergonomic shape that facilitates both laydown and cutting of film with reduced physical impact on the user. The three principal elements of this dispenser, i.e., handle, axis of tape roll and cutting blade are, unlike the above described devices, aligned in substantially the same plane. This alignment facilitates placement of the adhesive film on the desired application surface with minimal rotation of the dispenser. This result is better enabled because the tape roll is very close to the application surface when the dispenser is held by the user. By contrast, in the prior art pistol grip dispensers the adhesive film or tape roll is located a distance from the application surface at least equal to the length of the handle. That distance of roll from surface contributes to the awkward rotation of the prior art pistol grip devices.
When the dispenser disclosed in this application is held in a normal manner by the user, the tape roll is immediately adjacent the application surface and ready for use with little or no rotation of the dispenser.
When the desired amount of tape is applied to an application surface and is to be cut, the dispenser need only be rotated a few degrees for a few seconds to allow contact of a cutting blade with the tape. This rotation is guided by a flexible, curvilinear cutting blade shield extending along the forward end of the dispenser frame. This curvilinear shield also performs other functions in addition to protecting a user from contact with the dispenser's cut off blade. It acts as a surface for burnishing the end of the tape as it is applied to the application surface just before being cut off from the roll. It also can contain one or more features that manage the loose end of the adhesive film or tape after it is cut off from the roll. Among those features for holding the loose tape end in place are: miniature depressions or dimples on a portion of the shield that act as suction cups; a portion of the shield that generates enough static electricity to hold the tape in place between applications; and various low tension adhesive coatings.
To further improve management of the loose tape end, the tape roll carrier contains a mechanism that prevents counter-rotation of the tape roll. A ratchet mechanism associated with the tape carrier allows the tape to rotate in only one direction, namely, the direction in which tape is applied to the application surface. Thus, after the tape is cut off, there is no counter-rotation or backlash of the roll that would pull the loose end of the tape back into contact with the roll.
The dispenser of this invention works best with tape rolls having a relatively small (1 to 1½) inch core but other core sizes can be used. A tape roll having a core approximating one-and-a-half inches facilitates many of the ergonomic and operational features just described.
An optional feature of this adhesive film dispenser is inclusion of a cutting blade in the handle. This cutting blade is preferably tucked into the end of the handle in a manner that facilitates its use to open cartons, cut string and the like, but is not dangerous to the user of the dispenser. Commonly assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/425,586 filed Nov. 12, 2002 discloses such a combined tape dispenser and cutting tool.
The adhesive film dispenser 10 is configured for ergonomic application of adhesive film or tape 12 from a roll 14 onto an application surface 20 (See
The dispenser 10 is formed around an underlying frame 22 (See.
To maintain the desired ergonomic profile, these three components of dispenser 10, namely, handle 24, mandrel 26 and blade 28 are preferably aligned along a plane passing through these components, as illustrated by the phantom line in
The tape roll 14 can be mounted on dispenser 10 in a manner that facilitates adjustment of the roll's freedom to rotate in dispenser 10. As shown in
It has been found helpful to limit the rotation of tape roll 14 to one direction in order to properly manage the loose end of the adhesive film after it is cut from the roll. More particularly, it is desirable to have roll 14 always rotate in the direction in which tape is dispensed (Arrow “A” in
To prevent counter-rotation, a circular, toothed ratchet wheel 40 surrounds mandrel 26 on frame 22. The angle of the teeth 42 in the direction of desired rotation is gently sloped. The angle of the teeth 42 in the opposite (counter-rotation) direction is steep. The underside of tape carrier 32 has a small protrusion 43 that is dimensioned to ride up the gentle slope of teeth 42 in the desired direction but is not able to overcome the steep pitch of teeth 42 in the opposite direction. This is one arrangement of parts to prevent, or limit, counter-rotation of tape roll 14. Other approaches may be used in the practice of this invention.
A cutting blade 28 is mounted on frame 22 at the forward end of dispenser 10. A user of dispenser 10 is protected from unwanted contact with cutting blade 28 by shield 30 that normally extends from frame 22 in a curved arc (See
Curvilinear shield 30 is made from a flexible material that nevertheless retains its shape when pressure on it is released, for example, polycarbonate.
When application of tape 12 on surface 20 is completed, the tape can be cut by rotating dispenser 10 as shown in
Tape dispensers are often used to seal boxes or packages.
Some portions of the exterior surface of handle 24 preferably contain an elastomeric coating 44 that assists a user in gripping the handle. Similar coatings can be used in other portions of the dispenser, for example, on the thumb hold 46 on the top of the dispenser.
Management of the loose tape end 13 after it is cut from tape applied to application surface 20 is aided by at least one pair of tabs 50 on the forward end of frame 22 near the point where shield 30 is attached to frame 22. Additional control of the loose tape end 13 can be achieved with one or more tape retention features included in shield 30. One such tape retention feature is a static strip 52 mounted on the shield 30, preferably below opening 31 in shield 30 as shown in
The dispenser 10 may optionally include utility blades 58 in the handle 24 such as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3586587 | Boyce | Jun 1971 | A |
3709760 | Knoner | Jan 1973 | A |
3954550 | Patterson | May 1976 | A |
3969180 | Ravesloot | Jul 1976 | A |
4096021 | Pool et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
D256478 | Groff | Aug 1980 | S |
4486263 | Monzo Gomez | Dec 1984 | A |
4555298 | Boucher | Nov 1985 | A |
4574030 | Pilcher | Mar 1986 | A |
D283631 | Miller et al. | Apr 1986 | S |
4591407 | Samuelson | May 1986 | A |
4762586 | Wilkie | Aug 1988 | A |
4804437 | Tirtoprodjo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4818329 | Tutas et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4853073 | Marchetti | Aug 1989 | A |
4944720 | Suhr | Jul 1990 | A |
4961525 | Corbo et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4989769 | Longworth | Feb 1991 | A |
5022576 | Jenq | Jun 1991 | A |
5073228 | Lin | Dec 1991 | A |
D326475 | Alexander | May 1992 | S |
5110401 | Huang | May 1992 | A |
5181983 | Sakai | Jan 1993 | A |
D338041 | Cheng | Aug 1993 | S |
5363997 | Harris | Nov 1994 | A |
5380395 | Uchida | Jan 1995 | A |
5393367 | Yu Chen | Feb 1995 | A |
5456790 | Yu Chen | Oct 1995 | A |
5468332 | Dretzka et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5641377 | Chung et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
D401281 | Huerta | Nov 1998 | S |
5849144 | Tang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851348 | Muenzer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857706 | McQueeny | Jan 1999 | A |
5861080 | Yang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890290 | Davis | Apr 1999 | A |
D412820 | Lee | Aug 1999 | S |
5954916 | Orlandi | Sep 1999 | A |
D416288 | Kuehn | Nov 1999 | S |
6039102 | Sadrakula et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6098690 | Robichaud | Aug 2000 | A |
D433062 | Ho | Oct 2000 | S |
6152398 | Chen | Nov 2000 | A |
D445661 | Chen | Jul 2001 | S |
6257298 | Huang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D448413 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2001 | S |
D448414 | Carlson | Sep 2001 | S |
6296033 | Clements | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D454911 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2002 | S |
D463825 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
6478067 | Huang | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491082 | Fu | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6641081 | Huang | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6848489 | Lissoni | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20040089424 | McDonald | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 409 532 | Jan 1991 | EP |
2 060 887 | Jun 1971 | FR |
68 047755 | Mar 1983 | JP |
06 016321 | Jan 1994 | JP |
09 208114 | Aug 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040244917 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |