This disclosure generally relates to drag reduction systems for wings and more specifically to adhesive panels of microvane arrays for reducing adverse effects of wingtip vortices.
Wingtip vortices are patterns of rotating air left behind a wing as it generates lift. Wingtip vortices may typically form at the end of the wing (e.g., the tip of an aircraft wing) but may also occur at other points along the wing with abrupt structural changes (e.g., at the edge of flap devices on a wing). Wingtip vortices may be associated with increased drag forces, and thus may cause inefficiencies.
According to one embodiment, a wing includes a low pressure side, a high pressure side opposite the low pressure side, and a drag reducing apparatus coupled to the low pressure using an adhesive. The drag reducing apparatus includes a first side coupled to the low pressure side of the wing, and a second side opposite the first side, the second side comprising a plurality of vortex generators arranged in an array configuration, the array configuration of vortex generators operable to weaken a wingtip vortex generated by the wing by generating one or more vane vortices near an end of the low pressure side of the wing.
Technical advantages of certain embodiments may include providing reduced aerodynamic drag upon wings and/or reducing wake turbulence behind wings by reducing wingtip vortices. Some embodiments may provide drag reduction systems at a lower weight and/or lower cost than traditional drag reduction systems. Furthermore, some embodiments may provide drag reduction systems that require less aircraft downtime than traditional drag reduction systems. Other technical advantages will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims. Moreover, while specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include all, some, or none of the enumerated advantages.
Typical wing designs may allow for the creation of large vortices at or around the ends of the wing, such as at the tip of an aircraft wing. These vortices may increase wake turbulence behind the wing, which may cause issues for other wings following behind. For example, wake turbulence may cause a trailing aircraft to become difficult or impossible to control. Furthermore, these vortices may add to the drag forces applied to a wing, and may therefore create fuel burn inefficiencies for the aircraft using the wing. Reducing wing vortices is therefore advantageous. Current techniques for reducing wing vortices through the addition of drag reduction apparatuses, however, may require substantial downtime for the aircraft and/or substantial expense. As an example, one current technique for reducing wing vortices includes retrofitting aircraft with winglets. The addition of these winglets to an already-deployed aircraft may require millions of dollars and many weeks of downtime.
Accordingly, teachings of the present disclosure provide a simple, low cost, modification that may be applied to an already-deployed aircraft that allows for reduction in the amount of drag applied to the wing and wake turbulence behind the wing. In particular embodiments, this may be done by decreasing the strength of the wing vortices through the use of one or more microvane arrays incorporated in an adhesive panel, which may easily be applied to already-deployed or already-created wings. Microvanes may refer to small-scale (relative to the wing chord length) vortex generators oriented approximately normal to airflow along a surface of a wing that redirect air as it flows over the wing. The size of the microvane array vortex generators may be on the order of the height of the wing boundary layer, while winglets may often be sized to a height on the order of the wingtip chord length. The microvane arrays generate a series of co-rotating vortices that flow over the wing tip and serve to weaken the rotational strength of the wingtip vortex by aerodynamically or fluid dynamically thickening the apparent radius of wingtip without requiring any physical changes to the wingtip radius structure. In particular embodiments, an adhesive panel comprising one or more arrays of microvanes may be positioned on the low pressure side of a wing such that air flowing over the low pressure side is displaced, weakening the strength of the resulting wingtip vortices. While the microvane arrays may displace air flowing on the low pressure side of a wing, it will be understood that the microvanes contemplated by the present disclosure may have a minimal effect on the overall aerodynamic properties of the wing.
The adhesive panel of microvane arrays may be composed of any suitable material for use on the exterior of an aircraft, such as aluminum, titanium, polymer or reinforced polymer material, or composite material. In certain embodiments, the array of microvanes may be arranged or oriented in such a way that maximizes the drag reduction for the particular aircraft design on which the array is installed. For example, the arrangement and/or orientation of microvanes for a BOEING 747 wing may be different than those for a BOEING 777 wing. Such designs may include provisions for whether or not the aircraft currently has winglets installed. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the adhesive panel may include one or more markings indicating proper alignment of the adhesive panel during installation on the wing. For example, lines or dots may be included on the adhesive panel that correspond to particular features of a wing, allowing an installer to properly align the panel during installation by aligning the markings with the corresponding features of the wing. Examples of wing features that can be used to align the adhesive panel include skin seams, rivet lines and other obvious wing features. The adhesive panels may be coupled to any suitable portion of the aircraft, including without limitation the low pressure side of a wing on the aircraft (e.g., the top side of a wing).
To facilitate a better understanding of the present disclosure, the following examples of certain embodiments are given. In no way should the following examples be read to limit, or define, the scope of the disclosure. Embodiments of the present disclosure and its advantages are best understood by referring to
One method of reducing the drag forces induced by vortices 110 is the use of winglets.
Accordingly, a simpler, low cost solution to reducing wingtip vortices may be desired, such as adhesive panels of microvane arrays according to the teachings of the present disclosure. Adhesive panels of microvane arrays may provide an alternative to current drag reduction systems such as winglets 160. For example, rather than choosing to install winglets 160 on an aircraft to reduce drag, an owner may choose instead to install the adhesive panels of microvane arrays. However, it will also be understood that adhesive panels of microvane arrays may be used in conjunction with current drag reduction systems such as winglets 160.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to
The adhesive panels of microvane arrays 250 may be located on any suitable surface of wing 200, such as at the end of the low pressure surface of wing 200 (e.g., the end tip of wing 200 or end of a flap on wing 200). In certain embodiments, when air flows over the adhesive panels of microvane arrays 250 on the low pressure surface of wing 200, one or more vane vortices 260 are formed on the low pressure surface of wing 200 such that the vane vortices impede the circulation of the relatively high pressure air flowing upward from the high pressure surface side of wing 200. The vane vortices 260 produced by microvane arrays 250 may therefore constrain the formation of the wingtip vortices 270. As shown in
In particular embodiments, adhesive panels of microvane arrays 250 are positioned on wing 200 such that the centers of vane vortices 260 are different from the centers of wingtip vortices 270. This provides an opposition region in which the vane vortex 260 and the wingtip vortex 270 oppose each other, which may cause a combined effective vortex core to be distributed between the vane vortices 260 and the wingtip vortex 270. This may provide a rapid far field vortex dissipation effect, lessening the size of wingtip vortex 270. It will be understood, however, that although vane vortices 260 rotate in the same direction as the wingtip vortex 270, the induced velocities of vane vortices 260 and wingtip vortex 270 reinforce each other, reducing or eliminating lift degradation or induced drag on wing 200.
In particular embodiments, the adhesive panels of microvane arrays 250 include one or more markings 255 as shown in
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to
The vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are any suitable size and/or shape, and are oriented in any suitable way. In certain embodiments, the design (including size, shape, or orientation (including the position relative to the wing or angle relative to the low pressure surface)) of the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 is optimized for particular speeds of airflow. For example, the design of the vortex generators 320 is optimized for cruising speeds of an aircraft (e.g., the average speed at which the aircraft flies between takeoff and landing) on which the microvane arrays 310 are to be installed in order to maximize drag reduction over time. As another example, the design of the vortex generators 320 on microvane arrays 310 is optimized for speeds (e.g., landing approach speeds) at which high angles of attack and lift enhancing aircraft configurations such as flap extension tend to create or greatly enhance the strength of tip vortices in order to reduce wake turbulence.
In certain embodiments, the height of the vortex generators 320 or microvane array 310 is within 0.25 and 0.5 inches. In certain embodiments, the shapes of the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are semi-spherical. In some embodiments, the shapes of the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are rectangular. In other embodiments, the shapes of the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are cone-shaped. In some embodiments, the shapes of the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are pyramid-shaped (e.g., triangular, square, pentagonal, or hexagonal).
In particular embodiments, the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are oriented at an angle of approximately normal to a portion of the low pressure surface on which they are to be installed. However, in other embodiments, the vortex generators 320 of microvane arrays 310 are oriented at certain angles relative to the normal axis of the low pressure surface on which they are to be installed, such as at 30 or 45 degrees relative to the axis normal to the low pressure surface.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to
Herein, “or” is inclusive and not exclusive, unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Therefore, herein, “A or B” means “A, B, or both,” unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Moreover, “and” is both joint and several, unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context. Therefore, herein, “A and B” means “A and B, jointly or severally,” unless expressly indicated otherwise or indicated otherwise by context.
The scope of this disclosure encompasses all changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications to the example embodiments described or illustrated herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. The scope of this disclosure is not limited to the example embodiments described or illustrated herein. Moreover, although this disclosure describes and illustrates respective embodiments herein as including particular components, elements, functions, operations, or steps, any of these embodiments may include any combination or permutation of any of the components, elements, functions, operations, or steps described or illustrated anywhere herein that a person having ordinary skill in the art would comprehend. Furthermore, reference in the appended claims to an apparatus or system or a component of an apparatus or system being adapted to, arranged to, capable of, configured to, enabled to, operable to, or operative to perform a particular function encompasses that apparatus, system, component, whether or not it or that particular function is activated, turned on, or unlocked, as long as that apparatus, system, or component is so adapted, arranged, capable, configured, enabled, operable, or operative.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/672,860 filed Aug. 9, 2017 entitled “Adhesive Panels of Microvane Arrays for Reducing Effects of Wingtip Vortices,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/569,270 filed Dec. 12, 2014 and entitled “Adhesive Panels of Microvane Arrays for Reducing Effects of Wingtip Vortices,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,868,516.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2800291 | Stephens | Jul 1957 | A |
3776363 | Kuethe | Dec 1973 | A |
4354648 | Schenk et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4693201 | Williams et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5058837 | Wheeler | Oct 1991 | A |
5340054 | Smith et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
6837465 | Lisy et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7100969 | Choi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7334760 | Lisy et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7914259 | Godsk | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8210482 | Miller et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226038 | Smith et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240616 | Miller et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8353482 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8413928 | Rawlings et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8523115 | Essenhigh et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8656957 | Babinsky et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657238 | Fox et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8870124 | Ireland | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9868516 | Rosenberger et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9896192 | Domek et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10752340 | Rosenberger | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20060134379 | Pulkka | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20090020652 | Rincker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110006165 | Ireland | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008174 | Ireland | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120049001 | Smith et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120257977 | Jensen | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130009016 | Fox et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130146715 | Domel et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130255796 | Dimascio et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150329200 | Barrett | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150336659 | Zhong et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160052621 | Ireland et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170137116 | Ireland et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201 07 863 | Oct 2001 | DE |
2 484 898 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2 604 516 | Jun 2013 | EP |
WO 9011929 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 2001016482 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2015030573 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brazilian Preliminary Examination BR102015031082-0, dated May 8, 2020. |
Brazilian Search Report translation BR102015031082-0, dated May 6, 2020. |
Brazilian Search Report—relevance of the cited documents, dated May 6, 2020. |
Servicio Publico Federal Brazil, Patent Office, Written Opinion re BRI 02015031082-0 with translation, dated Feb. 22, 2022. |
Epo Official Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Appln. 15 198 368.1-1010, dated Aug. 6, 2020. |
Canadian Application No. 3,080,216, Canadian IP Office Action, dated Jun. 18, 2021. |
EPO Germany, Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No./Patent No. 15198368.1-1754, Ref. EP 103630GM900ch, dated Apr. 13, 2016. |
Canadian Patent Office, Office Action regarding Appln. No. 2,913,710, dated Apr. 8, 2020. |
Estrand, Adam M., “On the Stability and Control of a Trailing Vortex,” Master Thesis, Florida State University, 2016. Florida State University Libraries. Available at: http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/objects/fsu%360348, 2016. |
Canadian Patent Office Action regarding Application No. 3,080,216, dated Apr. 13, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200269970 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15672860 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 15930599 | US | |
Parent | 14569270 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15672860 | US |