1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to building construction, and the like, more particularly to an adjustable system for anchoring structural members to walls.
2. Background Art
It is well known in the art that codes and specifications are established for building construction for ensuring that buildings are constructed to withstand the loads and pressures that may be applied. Not only are builders governed by these regulations, it is advantageous to a builder to construct quality homes and buildings that withstand extreme conditions, to benefit the builder's repute and minimize liability. Attachment of structural members to walls in building construction is a process that is undertaken with grave attention and concern due to the significance of this attachment.
Under typical circumstances the structural members and walls experience gravity loading and compression distributed through the construction to the foundation or ground. However, the connection between the structural members and the walls may also experience loading in directions other than that caused by gravity. Specifically, these connections may experience loading caused by extreme wind, hurricane, earthquake, tornado, seismic conditions or the like. It is critical that the attachment of the structural members to the walls is designed to withstand the loading that these adverse conditions may subject the structure to. It is common that regulations or building codes require the structure to withstand vertical uplift loading within specified limits. These requirements may differ depending upon the geographic locations of the desired construction and the conditions that are typical for that area.
The prior art has established designs sufficient for undertaking the loading experienced by the attachments of structural members to walls and meeting the requirements set forth in the codes, specifications or regulations. The system typically employed for masonry walls includes a plurality of steel reinforcing bars throughout the wall and a plurality of anchors for fastening the structural members thereto. Typically, horizontal steel bars are set in the base or foundation and horizontal reinforcing bars are set in an upper concrete lintel poured in an upper region of the masonry wall. These foundation and lintel horizontal reinforcing bars are connected by a plurality of vertical reinforcing bars set within concrete poured columns within the masonry wall. The anchors are typically placed and set in the concrete lintel and include a hook or a similar configuration for interconnecting the anchor to the upper horizontal reinforcing bar. The structural members typically rest atop the wall and are secured to the anchors. The anchors typically include a plurality of apertures for receiving fasteners therethrough for securing the structural member to the anchor and consequently the masonry wall.
Although the system is sufficient for withstanding the applicable loading, there are drawbacks to the construction of this anchoring system. Firstly, the location of all anchors must be predetermined prior to the pouring of the concrete. All of the anchors must be accurately located in the construction of the masonry wall such that the structural members are accurately positioned in the construction of the carpentry. This requirement provides little flexibility to the design of the carpentry and requires that this design be completed beforehand. The placement of the anchors requires involvement of the carpenter with the mason during the phase of construction of the masonry wall. Consequently, all anchor locations must be measured and placed at the proper locations during the pouring of the concrete. Once the anchors are set, any design changes to the construction of the building would require an extreme amount of labor to incorporate.
Although the materials and components involved in this anchoring system are simple and low cost, the consequences of error are labor intensive and costly. If any error is made on the part of the draftsman, the mason or the carpenter and an anchor is cast in a wrong location, an alternate anchor must be selected, purchased, delivered, installed and inspected.
The prior art has overcome these disadvantages by providing adjustable anchoring systems that are embedded within concrete for either attaching structural members to a masonry wall or hanging pipes or conduit from a ceiling. Although these systems provide adjustment, the range of adjustment is limited in providing flexibility in the measurement and placement of the anchorage systems. Further, these adjustable anchoring systems comprise many components that are machined and/or welded, and are costly in light of the limited adjustability they provide.
The prior art provides various attachments for securing structural members to stud walls. These attachments comprise complex bracketry including designs for various applications. This bracketry typically requires fasteners installed in both the structural member and the stud wall. Accordingly, a builder attaching structural members to stud walls must retain a wide assortment of bracketry for the various attachment and securing possibilities encountered in the construction of a building.
Various techniques and designs have provided anchoring systems for attaching structural members to walls. It is the goal of the present invention to provide a simplified low cost, adjustable anchor system for securing structural members to walls.
The anchor system of the present invention attaches a series of structural members to a wall. The anchor system comprises an elongate horizontal track and a plurality of anchor plates. The track has a pair of spaced apart sidewalls defining therebetween an upwardly facing channel with a restricted opening. The anchor plates each have an enlarged head portion sized to fit within the channel and engage the sidewalls to retain the anchor plates at selected longitudinal positions. The anchor plate further includes a nailing plate and a relatively narrow strap extending between the head portion and the nailing plate. The strap is sized to pass between the side walls to position the nailing plate normal to the track for attaching the structural member thereto.
The uppermost row of masonry blocks are lintel blocks 38 stacked atop the full blocks 34. The row of lintel blocks 38 is secured to the full blocks 34 and to each other by mortar 36. The lintel blocks 38 are also hollow having a U-shaped cross-section and upright openings.
Typically, vertical reinforcing bars (not shown) are disposed within the masonry wall 32 on eight to ten foot centers. The vertical reinforcing bars are disposed within aligned vertical openings through the full blocks 34. The lowermost end of each vertical reinforcing bar is located proximate to or interconnecting with an elongate reinforcing bar embedded within the concrete foundation or base. The uppermost end of each vertical reinforcing bar passes through a hole formed in the bottom of the lintel block 38 aligned with the vertical reinforcing bar. For this purpose, a separate lintel block 38 is provided having a preformed hole to be aligned with the vertical reinforcing bar. Concrete 40 is then poured through this vertical column for reinforcing the masonry wall 32 structure, and anchoring the vertical reinforcing bar therein.
Subsequently, concrete 40 is poured within the channel of the row of lintel blocks 38. A horizontal reinforcing bar 42 is disposed therein, typically embedded halfway within the overall height of the lintel blocks 38. After the concrete 40 is poured, a plurality of anchor straps 44 are inserted into the wet concrete having a lower end proximate to or interconnecting with the horizontal reinforcing bar 42. The anchor straps 44 are set in the concrete at predetermined locations such that structural members, referenced generally by numeral 46, are fastened or secured to the anchor straps 44.
The prior art anchor system 30 effectively ties the structural members 46 to the foundation. The overall structure of the masonry wall 32 distributes the gravity loading caused by the overall weight of the structure in a downward direction to the base and foundation. The concrete 40 of the masonry blocks sufficiently support the compression applied thereupon. Although the concrete can support high compressive loads, concrete is a weak medium for handling tensile loads. Accordingly, the horizontal and vertical reinforcing bars reinforce the concrete structure when the structure experiences tension.
During inclement weather conditions, uplift pressure applied to the structural members is translated through uplift forces on the anchor straps 44 to the horizontal reinforcing bar 42. These uplift forces applied to the horizontal reinforcing bars 42 are distributed through the vertical reinforcing bars to the horizontal foundation reinforcing bars. Therefore, the uplift forces applied to the structure are counteracted by the overall weight of the structure.
The uplift forces applied to the reinforcing bar 42 and the resultant forces experienced within the concrete 40 and the horizontal reinforcing bar in connection with the vertical reinforcing bars causes the horizontal reinforcing bar 42 to experience longitudinal tension. Consequently, the uplift forces applied to the vertical reinforcing bars counteracted by the gravity of the structure causes the vertical reinforcing bars to experience tension. Finally, uplift forces applied to the horizontal reinforcing bars in the foundation at the connections with the vertical reinforcing bars are counteracted by the weight of the structure causing the horizontal foundation reinforcing bars to experience longitudinal tension having peaks at the locations of the vertical reinforcing bars.
In summary, the prior art anchor system 30 overcomes the loading problems caused by strong winds, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, seismic loading conditions or the like. However, prior art anchor system 30 provides no room for error amongst the phases of design, masonry and carpentry. Further, the prior art anchor system 30 requires much interaction between these three phases of construction to ensure that all anchor straps 44 are properly located. Further, there is no flexibility in the prior art anchor system 30 to allow changes in design once the anchor straps 44 are set. Any change in the design or correction of error results in high labor costs generated in the selection, purchase, delivery, installation and inspection of an alternate anchor.
Referring now to
The track 50, as illustrated in
The head portion 60 of the anchor plate 52 has a width greater than the width of the opening 58 in the track 50. The thickness of the anchor plate 52 is less than the opening 58 such that the head portion 60 of the anchor plate 52 may be inserted into the opening 58 of the track 50 at a first orientation, generally parallel with the length of the track 50. The anchor plate 52 is then rotated to a second orientation such that the nailing plate 62 is normal to the track 50. In this manner, the head portion 60 of the anchor plate is retained within the channel 56 of the track due to the interference of the head portion 60 provided by the sidewalls 54. This cooperation between the anchor plate 52 and the track 50 allows a user to insert an anchor plate 52 into the track 50 and slide the anchor plate 52 to a selected longitudinal position. When the anchor plate 52 is located at a position against a structural member 46, the user lifts the anchor plate 52 such that the head portion 60 engages the sidewalls 54 and fastens the anchor plate 52 to the structural member. This engagement secures the structural member 46 to the selected longitudinal position with respect to the track 50. The anchor plate 52 is fastened to the structural member 46 by fasteners inserted through the nailing plate 62. The cooperation of anchor plate 52 and structural member 46 retains the anchor plate 52 in the raised position, engaged with the track 50. Concomitantly, the cooperation secures the structural member 46 in the selected longitudinal position with respect to the track 50.
As shown in
This process has many advantages over the prior art. Firstly, the anchor system 48 of the present invention provides a separation of trades between the mason and the carpenter. The mason may simply construct the masonry wall 32 and place tracks 50 within their upper regions without having to work with the carpenter for measuring and placing a plurality of anchor straps 44 within the concrete 40. Thus, the construction may be easily separated into two phases of masonry and carpentry without much interaction of the two.
Furthermore, the adjustability of the anchor system 48 allows the carpenter to simply measure and secure the locations of the structural members 46 with respect to the masonry wall 32. If any changes are made to the design of the carpentry, or if any errors are made in the design of the carpentry or the locating of the structural members 46, the structural members 46 may be easily relocated without having to retrofit the anchor system 48.
The track 50 and the anchor plate 52 are formed of sheet steel or the like. Sheet steel is strong enough to withstand the required loads without necessitating an extreme thickness of the material.
Track 50 is manufactured using cold-formed processes. Processes such as rolling and bending are employed to effectively create the elongate track 50 having a generally U-shaped cross-section defined by the channel 56 and opposed sidewalls 54. The track 50 may be reinforced against uplift loads by forming a lip 66 displaced along an upward region of each sidewall 54 preferably facing inward towards the channel 56. The lip 66 enhances the engagement of the track 50 and the head portion 60 of the anchor plate 52 thus increasing the pull out strength or capacity of the attachment of the structural member 46.
Further, a series of incrementally spaced recesses 68 may be formed along the downwardly extending lips 66. The recesses 68 are sized to receive a thickness of the head portion 60 such that the anchor plates 52 are securely attached to the sidewalls 54. This feature allows a user to slide the anchor plate 52 to the desired longitudinal position and then lift the anchor plate such that the head portion 60 engages the recesses. Accordingly, the recesses 68 are formed incrementally, for example, every ¼″, allowing the user to locate the structural members 46 at a nominal location. Furthermore, if a user needed to adjust the positioning of the structural member 46 by a selected distance, the user may simply use the incrementally spaced recesses 68 to measure this distance rather than having to measure the distance with a separate measuring tool. The recesses 68 may be formed in the track by a material removal process, however it is preferred that the recesses are pressed within the lip 66 thus maintaining or even enhancing the strength of the lip 66. Although the invention incorporates a series of recesses, the invention contemplates a series of protuberances formed along the sidewalls 54 for achieving similar benefits provided by the recesses 68.
The anchor plates 52 are also manufactured by cold-forming processes to create a component sufficient to withstand the described loads while maintaining attachment of the structural members 46. The invention contemplates that the anchor plates 52 comprise any geometry adequate for cooperating with the track 50 and attaching to the structural members 46. Specifically, the nailing plate 62 can take the form of any polygonal shape corresponding to the size and shape of the structural member 46 attached thereto. Preferably, the nailing plate 52 includes a plurality of apertures 70 sized to receive fasteners such as wood screws, sheet metal screws, machine screws, nails or the like for fastening the anchor plate 52 to the structural members 46.
As shown in
A structural member 46 may be anchored to the masonry wall 32 by one anchor plate 52 mounted on one side or a pair of anchor plates 52 mounted on opposite sides. The number of anchor plates 52 required is specified by the application and subject to the load requirements. When two or more structural members 46 are attached to the masonry wall 32 adjacent one another, the first structural member 46 is secured by a pair of anchor plates 52 fastened to either side thereof, and the second structural member is secured adjacent to one of the anchor plates 52 by a single anchor plate 52 mounted on the outboard side thereof. The outboard anchor plate 52 sandwiches the second structural member against one of the anchor plates 52 fastened to the first structural member 46.
The track 50 spans the length of the masonry wall 32 and has an overall length substantially equivalent to the overall length of the wall 32, such that the track defines a horizontal reinforcing member of the wall. In comparison to the prior art, the track 50 replaces the horizontal reinforcing bar 42. In summary, the present invention anchor system 48 distributes the load from the structural members 46 to the anchor plates 52 to the track 50. The load is distributed from the track 50 to the vertical reinforcing bars through their connection within the concrete 40. Subsequently, the vertical reinforcing bars distribute the load to the foundation reinforcing bars. Therefore, the cooperation of the track 50 and the concrete 40 and the interrelationship of the track 50, concrete 40 and vertical reinforcing bars is critical to determine the pullout capacity of the anchor system 48.
When uplift forces are applied to the track 50 at its connections with the structural members 46, and corresponding reaction forces are developed at the locations of the vertical reinforcing bars, the track 50 undergoes tension along its length. Accordingly, the elongate frictional adhesion of the outer peripheral surfaces of the track 50 embedded within the concrete 40 enhances the anchor system. The track 50 has a large peripheral surface area in comparison to the horizontal reinforcing bar 42 of the prior art anchor system 30 thus improving the adhesion.
Due to the pullout load applied at the attachment locations, the securing of the track 50 within the concrete 40 is critical to ensure the track 50 does not pull out of the concrete 40. Accordingly, it is preferred that the track 50 has a cross-section profiled to anchor the track 50 within the concrete 40. This anchoring is accomplished in a combination of the surface area of the periphery of the track 50 and a mechanical interlock between the cooperation of the track 50 and the concrete 40. The mechanical interlock can be achieved by providing sidewalls that are tapered such that the opening 58 is narrow with respect to a lower region of the channel 56 for anchoring the track 50 securely. The tapered sidewalls 54 allow concrete 40 to collect in a region above a portion of the track 50 such that the securing of the track 50 further includes pressure applied upon the surface by concrete 40 residing generally thereabove. Further, the pressure applied to the tapered sidewalls 54 resists against deformation of the track 50 from uplift forces applied to the anchor plates 52.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Another exemplary track 82 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
Conventional reinforcing bars typically include an exterior surface having a plurality of configurations for improving the adhesion within concrete. Accordingly, the longitudinal web 86 of the track 82 includes a series of apertures 88 sized to allow the concrete 40 to seep therethrough for mechanically interlocking the track 82 within the concrete 40.
To further enhance the interrelationship of the track 82, concrete 40 and vertical reinforcing bar, the track 82 is connectable to a vertical reinforcing bar (illustrated in
The sidewalls 54 are tapered to improve the anchoring of the track 82 within the concrete 40 by allowing concrete to collect in a region above the sidewalls. This enhances the engagement of the track 82 with the anchor plates 52, by providing pressure to the sidewalls 54 to prevent deformation of the sidewalls 54 due to pullout forces applied by the anchor plates 52.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In comparison to the bracketry of the prior art, which provided a plurality of brackets having a nailing plate specific to the structural member of each application, and a nailing plate specific to the wall of each application, the present invention provides anchor plates that have nailing plates 62 specific to the structural members 46 and having a common head portion 60 such that a narrower assortment of anchor plates is required to meet a variety of structural member to wall attachment applications.
The invention may also be used for attaching structural members 46 to the side of a concrete wall 103 as illustrated in an exemplary anchor system 104 in
In
The invention contemplates that the anchor system may be used on walls other than masonry walls in the aforementioned anchor system embodiments. For example, as seen in
Conventional head rails act as a horizontal reinforcing member in the structure of the stud wall. Accordingly, less material is required to manufacture the head rail 116 due to the additional support provided by the track 118. Furthermore, it may be conceived that the head rail 116 and track 118 may be unitarily formed in an H-shaped cross-section for reducing manufacturing costs and labor costs, and enhancing the overall horizontal reinforcing support of the stud wall 112.
The adjustability provided by the anchor system 111 is advantageous in light of the prior art solution which requires a wide assortment of bracketry for properly attaching the structural members 46 to the stud wall 112. Difficulties arise in the prior art due to the variation of spacing between structural members such as trusses and studs 114. For example, studs are typically constructed on sixteen inch centers and trusses or rafters are typically constructed on twenty-four inch centers. Accordingly, the prior art required at least two brackets for mounting the structural member 46 to the stud wall 114 dependent upon whether or not the structural members 46 were aligned or unaligned with the studs 112. The adjustability of the anchor system 111 overcomes these difficulties by allowing a user to secure structural members 46 to the stud wall 112 by using common anchor plates 52.
The invention contemplates that the anchor system 111 may be utilized for securing a panelized wall system rather than just structural members 46.
The present invention may be used to attach structural members 46 to a stemwall 122 as illustrated in
Referring now to
Although this anchor system 126 is more expensive than the aforementioned embodiments, including more components, some of which require costly manufacturing processes such as machining, this anchor system 126 may be preferred for attaching structural members that withstand the most extreme loads, such as girders 136, as illustrated.
The invention contemplates that the inserts 128 may be any form of elongate stock, fasteners, nuts or the like that are sized to pass between the sidewalls 54 at a first orientation and are sized to fit within the channel 56 and engage the sidewalls 54 at a second orientation such that the inserts 128 are retained at selected longitudinal positions with respect to the track 50 for the attachment of structural members 46.
The anchor system 48 of the present invention comprises a track for providing adjustable attachment of structural members and defining a horizontal reinforcing bar of the structural wall. Accordingly, the track spans the overall length or perimeter of the wall to provide the utmost adjustability and properly distribute loads throughout the wall to the vertical reinforcing bars. In order to provide convenience in manufacturing and lower the costs of the tracks of the anchor system, the tracks are manufactured at standard nominal lengths. The tracks may be customized to the length at the job site during installation by cutting the tracks to the required lengths. However, the standard track length may not be long enough to encompass an overall length of a wall. Therefore, where individual track pieces abut one another, a track splice 138 is provided for connecting abutting track pieces.
A track splice 138, shown in
Referring now to
A similar track splice is used for a corner connection of track pieces as illustrated by corner splice 146 in
Accordingly, the corner splice 146 is illustrated embedded within concrete with two terminating ends of track pieces at a corner of the wall 32 as illustrated in the plan view of
An alternative embodiment splice 148 is illustrated in
To prevent concrete from seeping within the channel 56 of the track a cover (not shown) is affixable to the track 50 for covering the opening 58 and preventing concrete 40 from seeping therethrough. The cover may be an individually formed piece of plastic or spring steel that snaps in during installation and is removed once the concrete 40 has set. Such a cover is costly to manufacture and is labor intensive. Alternatively, the cover may be a thin piece of tape or adhesive strip applied across the opening 58 of the track 50 for preventing concrete from passing therethrough. The tape cover may be resilient enough to withstand concrete from passing within and may be weak enough to be easily penetrated by the insertion of an anchor plate 52.
Although covers may adequately prevent concrete 40 from entering the track 50, it is ideal to prevent elements from collecting therein. In the instance of a faulty or leaking roof, or a similar problematic event, it would be misfortunate if precipitation collected within the track 50. The precipitation may be inviting to insects and may have a tendency to freeze causing damage to the structure. Accordingly, a low density foam may be dispensed within the channel 56 for preventing concrete 40 or water from seeping through the opening 58 of the track 50. The foam would have a density low enough that a user can insert an anchor plate 52 within the foam and easily compress the foam within the track 50 while adjusting the positioning of the anchor plate 52.
Referring now to
The track 152 has advantageous characteristics of resisting uplift forces transmitted thereupon by an anchor plate 158 illustrated in
The engagement of the anchor plate 158 and the track 152 is described with reference to
For enhancing the strength of the anchor plate 158, the lower portion 162 includes a plurality of lips 166 formed thereabout.
Similar to prior embodiments, the track 152 includes a pair of lips 66 formed in the side walls 54 having a series of incrementally spaced recesses 68 formed therein. Accordingly, the upper portion 164 of the enlarged head portion 160 is sized to fit within a pair of opposing recesses 68 for retaining the anchor plate 158 in a longitudinal position with respect to the track 152. From a manufacturing standpoint, the lips 66 and recesses 68 are formed about the opening 58 of the track piece 152 because this is the easiest location to form these features without effecting the strength of the track 152, nor requiring additional steps in manufacturing. Also, it is ideal that the recesses are formed at a location viewable to a user for aiding in the positioning or incremental spacing of anchor plates 158.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the invention provides a relatively low-cost solution that overcomes the deficiencies of known anchoring systems for attaching structural members to walls.
While exemplary embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that the above description illustrates and describes all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1115243 | Jordahl | Oct 1914 | A |
1588628 | Sellers | Jun 1926 | A |
1657441 | Gottfried | Jan 1928 | A |
1708091 | Healy | Apr 1929 | A |
1850276 | Zifferer | Mar 1932 | A |
1929835 | Awbrey | Oct 1933 | A |
1988124 | Johnson | Jan 1935 | A |
2396826 | Callan | Mar 1946 | A |
2396828 | Carpenter | Mar 1946 | A |
2947119 | Puckett, Jr. | Aug 1960 | A |
2953874 | Kindorf | Sep 1960 | A |
3266202 | Furer | Aug 1966 | A |
3565385 | Zurawski | Feb 1971 | A |
3601347 | Attwood et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3606418 | Buker et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3727355 | Vachon | Apr 1973 | A |
3877275 | Attwood | Apr 1975 | A |
3994111 | Papayoti | Nov 1976 | A |
4014151 | Erhart | Mar 1977 | A |
4027711 | Tummarello | Jun 1977 | A |
4073114 | Irish | Feb 1978 | A |
4085556 | Sonneville | Apr 1978 | A |
4130977 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4291996 | Gilb | Sep 1981 | A |
4365744 | Moehren | Dec 1982 | A |
4480941 | Gilb et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4523417 | Beastall et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4569167 | Staples | Feb 1986 | A |
4714372 | Commins | Dec 1987 | A |
4733986 | Kenning et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4819390 | Capper et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826078 | Arvin et al. | May 1989 | A |
4946099 | Bratchell | Aug 1990 | A |
4961553 | Todd | Oct 1990 | A |
5002436 | Sigourney | Mar 1991 | A |
5083706 | Bratchell | Jan 1992 | A |
5165628 | Todd et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5335470 | Alvarez | Aug 1994 | A |
5357721 | Alvarez | Oct 1994 | A |
5370577 | Jonett et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5442887 | Welsh | Aug 1995 | A |
5640822 | Haswell | Jun 1997 | A |
5699639 | Fernandez | Dec 1997 | A |
5732524 | Kalker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5809703 | Kelly | Sep 1998 | A |
5823727 | Lee | Oct 1998 | A |
6073404 | Norfleet | Jun 2000 | A |
6151843 | Weaver et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6334285 | Kirschner | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341466 | Kehoe et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6598363 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6662517 | Thompson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030217521 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |