This application relates generally to ergonomic workplace environments, and more particularly, to an adjustable desk platform or desk.
Sitting for long periods of time during the work day is generally not good for one's health and wellness. Medical studies show that sitting increases the rate of all-cause mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity, for example. People who sit for most of the day are 50 percent more likely to die of heart attacks. Even if you exercise, the longer you sit the greater the chances you will die. Sitting shuts down the circulation of the fat-absorbing enzyme lipase, while standing up engages muscles and promotes the distribution of lipase, which prompts the body to process fat and cholesterol, independent of the amount of time spent exercising.
There are desks available to be used while standing, and even desks adapted for use while a user is on a treadmill. However, standing for very long periods of time to work is more tiring, dramatically increases the risks of carotid atherosclerosis because of the additional load on the circulatory system, and increases the risks of varicose veins.
Taking regular breaks from sitting for prolonged periods of time can have several positive outcomes. For example, standing can provide more energy during the work day. In addition, because standing burns more calories than sitting, standing can also result in weight loss without changes in diet or exercise. It is also harder to become more tired or lose focus when standing.
Because regular breaks from sitting are beneficial, and because many people during the work day want to remain productive while taking breaks from sitting, and because everyone will sit and stand for different lengths of time at different times during the day, there exists a need to create a work environment that is ergonomic for someone standing as well as sitting, and allows the transition to be easy, quick, and simple.
According to embodiments, an adjustable desk platform can include: an upper platform defining a substantially planar work surface; a base located beneath the upper platform, the base defining a bottom surface without legs that is adapted to sit on an existing desk; first and second sets of arms coupling the upper platform to the base, wherein the first and second sets of arms are adapted for movement of the upper platform substantially in parallel with the base between a fully raised position and a fully lowered position; and a user-operable locking mechanism associated with the upper platform, the locking mechanism adapted to releasably lock the upper platform in the fully raised position, and in at least one intermediate position between the fully raised position and the fully lowered position.
According to another embodiment, the adjustable desk platform can include: an upper platform defining a substantially planar work surface; a base located beneath the upper platform, the base defining a bottom surface without legs that is adapted to sit on an existing desk; and first and second sets of arms coupling the upper platform to the base, wherein the first and second sets of arms are adapted for movement of the upper platform substantially in parallel with the base between a fully raised position and a fully lowered position; wherein the upper platform moves laterally with respect to the base when moved from the fully lowered position to the fully raised position, and the base includes a counterweight adapted to offset weight of the upper platform when in the raised position.
According to another embodiment, the adjustable desk platform can include: an upper platform defining a substantially planar work surface; a base located beneath the upper platform, the base defining a bottom surface without legs that is adapted to sit on an existing desk; first and second sets of arms coupling the upper platform to the base, wherein the first and second sets of arms are adapted for movement of the upper platform substantially in parallel with the base between a fully raised position and a fully lowered position; and a biasing mechanism associated with at least one of the first and second sets of arms, wherein moving the upper platform toward the fully raised position loads the biasing mechanism.
According to another embodiment, the adjustable desk platform can include: an upper platform defining a substantially planar work surface, the upper platform having first and second hand apertures extending therethrough; a base located beneath the upper platform, the base defining a bottom surface without legs that is adapted to sit on an existing desk; first and second sets of arms coupling the upper platform to the base, wherein the first and second sets of arms are adapted for movement of the upper platform substantially in parallel with the base between a fully raised position and a fully lowered position; and first and second user-operable locking mechanisms associated with the upper platform, each of the first and second locking mechanisms adapted to releasably lock the upper platform in the fully raised position, wherein the first and second locking mechanism each include a user operable handle mounted to an underside of the upper platform substantially adjacent to one of the hand apertures.
Other features and advantages will become apparent from the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, embodiments of the invention are disclosed.
The features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements.
Embodiments of the invention are discussed in detail below. In describing embodiments, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected. While specific embodiments are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Embodiments of the adjustable desk platform described herein can transition between a lower operating position and an upper operating position quickly, easily, and simply. This may be useful, for example, to provide height adjustability to conventional, fixed desktop workspaces. Alternatively, embodiments of the adjustable desk platform can include their own support legs.
Referring to
Referring to
Lower platform 20 can include two upper mounting brackets 21, for example, one located near each side of the lower platform 20. The upper mounting brackets can be formed integrally with the lower platform 20, or alternatively, can be secured thereto using fasteners or other means known in the art. Lower platform 20 can also include one or more counter weights 22, and a housing 23 near each upper mounting bracket 21.
Referring to
As shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
When in use, the user can place the adjustable desk platform on to a desktop, and may place items on the upper platform 10 as desired, such as, without limitation, a computer, documents, desk lamps, instruments, and supplies. The user can adjust the height between the upper platform 10 and the lower platform 20 according to their working posture and/or other needs.
As shown In
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Increasing the weight on upper platform 10 (e.g., by placing an item on the upper platform 10) can increase the difficulty of raising the upper platform 10 from the lower platform 20. Due to the configuration of the biasing mechanism 50, booster spring 53, and pivot point 54, when upper platform 10 is raised from the lower platform 20, the elastic force of booster spring 53 and spring 51 can influence the boss 321 of each secondary pivot arm 32, causing secondary pivot arm 32 to generate an upward lifting force, reducing the amount of effort required from the user to raise the upper platform 10.
When lifting upper platform 10, the overall center of gravity of the adjustable desk platform can shift between lower platform 20 and upper platform 10, especially when various items are placed on top of upper platform 10. Because items located on the upper platform create additional weight, the overall center of gravity of the adjustable desk platform will quickly shift to the upper platform 10, and potentially make the adjustable desk platform unstable. Accordingly, the counterweight(s) 22 can increase the weight of lower platform 20, thereby helping to counterbalance the weight of the upper platform 10 when in the raised position and/or when weighted with items.
According to embodiments, the housings 23 of upper platform 10 and the housings 46 of locking set 40 can help protect the user's fingers or other foreign matter from being caught in the locking sets 40, the pivot arm sets 30, and/or inside of the biasing mechanisms 50. Housings 23 and housings 46 can also add to the aesthetic appearance of the adjustable desk platform.
Referring to
When desired, the keyboard tray 70 can be attached to lower platform 20, and items can be placed on it, such as a keyboard. According to embodiments, tray 70 can be located at an adjustable distance from the lower platform 20.
Referring to an alternative embodiment shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The legs 90, whether fixed or adjustable in length, can allow the adjustable desk platform to be self-supported above the ground. Casters, rollers, wheels, or other structures (not shown) can be provided at the bottom of the legs 90 to facilitate movement of the adjustable desk platform. Except for the provision of legs and the related structures, embodiments of the adjustable desk platform shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Generally similar to the embodiment of
As best seen in
Referring to
Still referring to
Referring to
According to an aspect of the embodiment of
Referring to
In the embodiment of
Although the keyboard tray 70A is shown substantially fixed in position in
Referring to
The arrangement of the apertures and handle 42 can be used on any of the embodiments of adjustable desk platforms described herein. The arrangement of apertures 130 and handles 42 can be useful in embodiments having a wide upper platform 10, for example and without limitation, those with a width W1 of about 48 inches or greater. For example, with embodiments having an upper platform 10 of this size, it may be difficult or uncomfortable for the user to reach around the lateral ends of the platform to reach the handles 42 (e.g., due to limited wingspan). Accordingly, the apertures 130 can allow the handles 42 to be separated by a comfortable width W2 of between about 18 and about 36 inches, for example, between about 28 and 32 inches, while the upper platform 10 has a larger overall width W1.
The embodiments illustrated and discussed in this specification are intended only to teach those skilled in the art the best way known to the inventors to make and use the invention. Nothing in this specification should be considered as limiting the scope of the present invention. For example, the arrangement of features with respect to the upper platform and the lower platform, such as, e.g., the locking mechanism, can be reversed. All examples presented are representative and non-limiting. The above-described embodiments of the invention may be modified or varied, without departing from the invention, as appreciated by those skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the claims and their equivalents, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
This application is a continuation of applicant's co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/714,682, filed May 18, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 14/183,052, filed on Feb. 18, 2014 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,055,810), which is a continuation-in-part of applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 14/013,285 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,113,703), filed on Aug. 29, 2013, which is a continuation-in-part of applicant's U.S. application Ser. No. 13/642,651 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,671,853), filed on Oct. 22, 2012, which in turn is the national stage of International Application No. PCT/US2012/48775, filed on Jul. 30, 2012, which in turn claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/651,101, filed on May 24, 2012. The entire contents of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
210031 | Hawthorn | Nov 1878 | A |
226053 | Finnegan | Mar 1880 | A |
558519 | Welker | Apr 1896 | A |
588519 | Welker | Aug 1897 | A |
644247 | Henley | Feb 1900 | A |
775731 | McCabe, Jr. | Nov 1904 | A |
780829 | Stengel | Jan 1905 | A |
982098 | Russ | Jan 1911 | A |
1040255 | Altermatt | Oct 1912 | A |
1161794 | Sheehan | Nov 1915 | A |
1244520 | Lloyd | Oct 1917 | A |
1669065 | Minton | May 1928 | A |
1689445 | Merriman | Oct 1928 | A |
1824822 | Kradolfer | Sep 1931 | A |
2170098 | Stephenson | Aug 1939 | A |
2406436 | Peter | Aug 1946 | A |
2451259 | Tronic | Oct 1948 | A |
2531140 | Linde | Nov 1950 | A |
2545515 | Gannett | Mar 1951 | A |
2566668 | Krueger | Sep 1951 | A |
2585535 | Carlsson | Feb 1952 | A |
2630359 | Schade | Mar 1953 | A |
2641247 | Genebach | Jun 1953 | A |
2727799 | Keal | Dec 1955 | A |
2766088 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
2892050 | May | Jun 1959 | A |
2913122 | Lomas | Nov 1959 | A |
3203373 | King | Aug 1965 | A |
3347184 | Kiraly | Oct 1967 | A |
3410328 | Sasai | Nov 1968 | A |
3472183 | Goodman | Oct 1969 | A |
3474743 | Blevins | Oct 1969 | A |
3494306 | Aguilar | Feb 1970 | A |
4032103 | Ehrichs | Jun 1977 | A |
4073240 | Fly | Feb 1978 | A |
4194452 | Crowther | Mar 1980 | A |
4249749 | Collier | Feb 1981 | A |
4296694 | Kobayashi | Oct 1981 | A |
4383486 | Reineman et al. | May 1983 | A |
4437411 | Maxwell | Mar 1984 | A |
4515086 | Kwiecinski et al. | May 1985 | A |
4558847 | Coates | Dec 1985 | A |
4624657 | Gould et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625657 | Little | Dec 1986 | A |
4685731 | Migut | Aug 1987 | A |
4691886 | Wendling et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4714025 | Wallin et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4729533 | Hillary et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4926760 | Sack | May 1990 | A |
5037054 | McConnell | Aug 1991 | A |
5039054 | Pai | Aug 1991 | A |
5048784 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5088420 | Russell | Feb 1992 | A |
5088421 | Beckstead | Feb 1992 | A |
5092652 | Macaluso | Mar 1992 | A |
5174223 | Nagy et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176351 | Moore | Jan 1993 | A |
5224429 | Borgman et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5249533 | Moore, III | Oct 1993 | A |
5324064 | Sumser et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5325794 | Hontani | Jul 1994 | A |
5375514 | Dann, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5405204 | Ambrose | Apr 1995 | A |
5408940 | Winchell | Apr 1995 | A |
5410971 | Golden et al. | May 1995 | A |
5445353 | Sakamoto | Aug 1995 | A |
5456191 | Hall | Oct 1995 | A |
5490466 | Diffrient | Feb 1996 | A |
5495811 | Carson et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5526756 | Watson | Jun 1996 | A |
5549052 | Hoffman | Aug 1996 | A |
5588377 | Fahmian | Dec 1996 | A |
5606917 | Cauffiel | Mar 1997 | A |
5636711 | Nussbaum | Jun 1997 | A |
5649493 | Blume | Jul 1997 | A |
5681034 | Noniewicz | Oct 1997 | A |
5771814 | Clausen | Jun 1998 | A |
5809908 | Catta et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823120 | Holmquist | Oct 1998 | A |
5829948 | Becklund | Nov 1998 | A |
6003450 | Bruckner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6038986 | Ransil et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6101956 | Keil | Aug 2000 | A |
6158359 | Allan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6213575 | Brin, Jr. et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220185 | Pontoppidan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220660 | Bedro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269753 | Roddan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283047 | Haller(-Hess) et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286441 | Burdi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286812 | Cherry | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6435110 | Keil | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6439657 | Tholkes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6510803 | Agee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527235 | Cotterill | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546880 | Agee | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550724 | Gosling | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6595144 | Doyle | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598544 | Laws et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6643960 | Manfiotto | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6644748 | Tholkes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682030 | Santoro et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6701853 | Hwang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6702372 | Tholkes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705239 | Doyle | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726276 | Tholkes et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6905102 | Lin | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907829 | Bambach | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6991199 | Carpentier | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7048236 | Benden et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073464 | Keil | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077068 | Agee | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7107915 | Laws et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111825 | Landsberger et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140306 | Chen | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7201108 | Eusebi | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204343 | Seaman | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7428882 | Keil | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7523905 | Timm et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7654208 | Patten | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677518 | Chouinard et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677678 | Mosel et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690317 | Beck et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703726 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7827921 | Shields et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827922 | Keil | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849789 | Whelan | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7862409 | Sheppard | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7878128 | Watson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887014 | Lindblad et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7942101 | Conley | May 2011 | B2 |
8015638 | Shimada et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016305 | Cheng | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051782 | Nethken et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8132518 | Kim et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8276525 | Janssen | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8443761 | Keil | May 2013 | B2 |
8522695 | Ellegaard | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544391 | Knox et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8671853 | Flaherty | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8752488 | Moller | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8919264 | Lager | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8935985 | Hjelm | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8947215 | Mandel et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8991320 | DesRoches et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9049923 | Delagey et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9055810 | Flaherty | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9084475 | Hjelm | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9093930 | Koch et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9113703 | Flaherty | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9167894 | DesRoches et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9236817 | Strothmann et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9277809 | Flaherty | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9326598 | West et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9332839 | Ringlein | May 2016 | B2 |
9380865 | Tempas | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20020189505 | Markofer | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030075080 | Allen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040040480 | Hwang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040094072 | Fabian | May 2004 | A1 |
20040211344 | Lor | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050039643 | Dailey | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050150438 | Allen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172869 | Schmidt | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050217540 | Novak | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247239 | Newhouse et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248239 | Newhouse et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060157628 | Mileos et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060262497 | Jahlokov | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266791 | Koch et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070034125 | Lo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070163475 | Murphy | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080060562 | Lor | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080203865 | Chouinard et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080245279 | Pan | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090145336 | Kenny | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100052276 | Brunner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100258040 | Coble | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110155023 | Krause et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110247532 | Jones | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297196 | Durante | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048151 | Moore | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081468 | Ozawa et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120085267 | Kenny | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120126072 | Pettersson | May 2012 | A1 |
20130014674 | Burkhalter | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130139736 | Flaherty | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130199420 | Hjelm | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140028168 | Klinke | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140096706 | Labrosse et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140336822 | Kristensen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140360413 | Schenk et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150007756 | Kollreider et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150136000 | Holtschi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150216296 | Mitchell | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282607 | Lager | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283012 | Koch et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150289641 | Ergun et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160000219 | Lager | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160051042 | Koch | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160081468 | Molteni | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160106205 | Hall et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160120303 | Constantino et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150876 | Flaherty et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014216002 | Mar 2015 | AU |
1231146 | Oct 1999 | CN |
2517300 | Oct 2002 | CN |
2759280 | Feb 2006 | CN |
201022484 | Feb 2008 | CN |
201210973 | Mar 2009 | CN |
202168584 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202286955 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102846016 | Jan 2013 | CN |
202664707 | Jan 2013 | CN |
202800587 | Mar 2013 | CN |
202874337 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103976579 | Aug 2014 | CN |
203860788 | Oct 2014 | CN |
203969627 | Dec 2014 | CN |
104337226 | Feb 2015 | CN |
204178672 | Feb 2015 | CN |
204239612 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104605637 | May 2015 | CN |
204519826 | Aug 2015 | CN |
204667198 | Sep 2015 | CN |
G-9105969 | Aug 1991 | DE |
19541759 | May 1997 | DE |
29705028 | Jul 1997 | DE |
102004059923 | Jun 2006 | DE |
0513838 | Nov 1992 | EP |
H 0956484 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2006212390 | Aug 2006 | JP |
20030055058 | Jul 2003 | KR |
20100111389 | Oct 2010 | KR |
101608957 | Apr 2016 | KR |
1006365 | Dec 1998 | NL |
WO-2005041721 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Engber, Daniel, “Who Made That: Standing Desk,” Innovation, Mar. 23, 2014, p. 14. |
European Search Report issued Dec. 17, 2014 in European Patent Application No. EP 2 842 458 A1. |
Extended European Search Report plus Annex, issued Jan. 5, 2015 in European Patent Application No. EP 14 18 2537. |
International Search Report Issued Oct. 26, 2012 in related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/048775. |
Letter and claim chart received via U.S. registered mail from Richard C. Emery Attorney at Law dated Mar. 18, 2015. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,052 on Nov. 7, 2014. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,285 on Sep. 22, 2014. |
Written Opinion issued Oct. 26, 2012 in related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/048775. |
Chinese Search Report including English translation, dated Apr. 16, 2015 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210358008.6. |
Chinese Office Action including English translation, dated Apr. 29, 2015 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210358008.6. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 issued May 8, 2015 in Austrlian Patent Application No. 2013245512. |
Extended European Search Report issued Dec. 16, 2015 in European Patent Application No. 12842684.8. |
Ergo Desktop, Home of “The Kangaroo” Adjustable Height Desk, posted at ergodesktop.com, Ergo Desktop, © 2015, 4 pages. |
Geek Reviews, “Ergodesktop's Kangaroo workstation, an Adjustable Stand Up Desk and Monitor Holder,” posted at geekculture.com, Geek Culture, © 2010, 3 pages. |
Ergo Desktop, “The Kangaroo Elite,” original © 2009, retrieved from https://www.ergodesktop.com/kangaroo-elite on Nov. 14, 2016, 3 pages. |
Ergo Desktop, “The Kangaroo Pro,” original © 2009, retrieved from https://www.ergodesktop.com/kangaroo-pro on Nov. 14, 2016, 3 pages. |
Ergo Desktop, “The Kangaroo,” original © 2009, retrieved from https://www.ergodesktop.com/kangaroo# on Nov. 14, 2016, 3 pages. |
BioMorph Ergonomic Solutions, Product Literature, © 1993, 2 pages. |
BioMorph, Adjustable Worksurface Height & Seating Positions, Product Literature, © 1993, 4 pages. |
BioMorph, Net Pricelist and Specifications, 1997, 14 pages. |
BioMorph, Interactive Desk, Assembly Instructions, 1995, 1999, 2 pages. |
Hewlett-Packard, HP Notebook Stands, Product Literature, © 2011, 2 pages. |
Hewlett-Packard, Dual Hinge Notebook Stand, Ergotron, Product Literature, © 2010, 4 pages. |
Hewlett-Packard, Dual Hinge Notebook Stand, Quick Setup Guide, © 2010, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160150876 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61651101 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14714682 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15014730 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14183052 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 14714682 | US | |
Parent | 14013285 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14183052 | US | |
Parent | 13642651 | US | |
Child | 14013285 | US |