1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a fluid level verification apparatus which is operable to measure the amount of fluid present in an object of interest, such as a tank, machine, or other article of manufacture, and more specifically, to an apparatus which may be manufactured or otherwise fabricated as a kit and assembled at a remote location for use on particular machines or in manufacturing processes; and which minimizes the number of components required; and further to a fluid level verification apparatus which reduces mechanical, thermal and chemical stresses on the apparatus.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The prior art is sated with examples of fluid level verification apparatuses which provide a means for visually verifying or otherwise discovering the fluid levels in an object of interest, such as manufacturing machinery, fluid holding tanks, or other similar assemblies. For example, in certain industrial processes or in certain machines or other articles of manufacture, it is important that particular fluids, such as lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids, or other fluid components, be stored in tanks and periodically dispensed from such tanks. Prior art fluid verification devices have typically included a transparent tube or inspection window, which is connected in particular relation to the holding tank, and which provides a quick and convenient means by which an observer may visually verify the level of the fluid present.
While the prior art devices have operated with success, they have been unsatisfactory in several respects.
Gruett U.S. Pat. No. 5,323,653 provides a detailed background of the prior art and describes a fluid level verification apparatus that can be fabricated as a kit and assembled at a remote location. Gruett contemplates an inspection tube having an interior conduit dimensioned to create an interference fit with an o-ring used to hermetically seal the inspection tube to an end member. The Gruett apparatus requires a separate seal on the outer diameter of its glass inspection tube to complete a hermetic seal.
Jackson U.S. Pat. No. 4,345,468 describes a double tube liquid site monitor which incorporates grooving and o-rings to isolate the inspection tube from the environment. However, the Jackson invention is complex and cumbersome, as it requires numerous parts to protect the inspection tube from the stresses caused by the environment. Moreover, the sealing function of the grooves are limited to the insert ends thus requiring the o-rings to rest against the internal and external surfaces of inspection tubes that have no such grooves and the problem of mechanical stress induced by the assembly of the inspection tubes to mating components is not contemplated.
Evans U.S. Pat. No. 4,050,305 describes an external shield bracket for a fluid flowmeter. The fluid of interest flows through a precision glass tube. An operator is protected from accidental explosion of the inspection tube due to fluid pressure by a protective transparent cover mounted on a u-shaped channel bracket. The Evans invention uses many parts, but fails to protect the inspection tube from the environment. Said transparent cover and mounting bracket do not form a hermetic closure for the inspection tube contained therein.
Gruett U.S. Pat. No. 3,886,796 describes a liquid level gauge with a rigid transparent plastic inspection tube with o-rings seated in grooves located in the end members. The Gruett invention induces mechanical stress on the inspection tube because Gruett did not contemplate o-ring grooves on the exterior or interior portions of the inspection tube. Further, because the ends of the inspection tube are restricted and nested in end members, stresses related to thermal, environmental and chemical expansion cycles are exasperated.
Lyden U.S. Pat. No. 3,540,276 describes a fluid level gauge. The Lyden invention uses an o-ring seal nested in an end member, communicating with the adjacent end of a site tube. Fluid leaks are minimized by placing the glass site tube in compression with the o-ring seal nested in the respective end member. The glass site tube is required because the Lyden invention requires compressive force on the tube. Thus, the design creates inherent mechanical stress and without utilizing the glass site tube adopts poorly to thermal, environmental and chemical expansion cycles and therefore would be susceptible to leakage.
Wech U.S. Pat. No. 6,532,815 describes a fluid level gauge. The Wech invention discloses a groove in an inspection tube and a groove in the nipple of a block in which an o-ring is placed. The design provides for ease of assembly and reduces the effects of inherent environmental stress on the apparatus. However, when installing the device, the mounting positions must be exact otherwise the o-ring will not sit properly in the two grooves. This makes installation more complicated and reliant on perfect placement. Incorrect installation would not only negatively impact the functionality of the device, but could also severely damage the tank on which it is to be installed.
In addition to the foregoing, many of the prior art devices are cumbersome and otherwise complex in their overall design, thereby increasing the cost to manufacture, decreasing the reliability and making them difficult to maintain. Further, the prior art is replete with designs that inadequately address the often conflicting requirements of resisting fluid leaks and protecting the inspection tube from mechanical, environmental, thermal and chemical stresses.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved fluid level verification apparatus.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a fluid level verification apparatus which can be fabricated as a kit and remain assembled through subsequent handling, transport, and shipping operations.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a fluid level verification apparatus which can be manufactured to provide convenient means to efficiently assemble the apparatus at a remote location for use with a wide range of devices and other objects of interest without waste of effort, time or motion expended on re-assembly of the apparatus. Specifically, an object of the present invention is to prevent inadvertent dislodging of particular components comprising the invention, such as the bolts in relation to the blocks.
Another object of the present invention is to protect the transparent inspection tube from mechanical stress during manufacture, transport, handling, shipping, assembly, and use to a wide range of devices and other objects of interest.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a means to reduce or eliminate stress on the apparatus, whether such stress is due to thermal, mechanical, environmental or chemical agents acting upon the apparatus.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a means to reduce or eliminate leaking of the fluid flowing through the apparatus.
Another object of the present invention is to provide for adjustment of the device to increase the ease of installation.
The invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims, rather than in the specific description preceding them. All embodiments that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention which may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring specifically to
Still referring to
Referring now to
With reference to
Now referring to
The tube 11 may be manufactured from various substrates such as nylon, polycarbonate, or other synthetic materials. While shown to be cylindrical in shape, it is conceivable that other conduit cross-sectional configurations could be utilized.
Looking now to
Continuing to look at
Fluid dispensed from and returning to the object of interest, such as a tank (not shown but including an entrance threaded opening matching the threads 96 of the bolts 90), thereby flowing through the bolt 90 by means of the cylinder bore 92, and the blocks 50A and 50B by means of the bore 56 in the blocks 50A and 50B, and cooperating with the bolt holes 108. As shown here, fluid enters the aperture 82 of the nipple 52B, and fills the conduit 14 of the inspection tune 11 to the liquid level of the tank supporting the inspection tube 11.
Referring generally to
As shown here, with further reference to
Providing adjustability not only eases installation of the apparatus but also promotes a better seal. For example, when installing the present invention the entrance threaded openings of the tank (not shown) do not have to be spaced apart to an exact distance. Instead, the distance between the openings may actually be within the adjustability range of the apparatus 10. This not only greatly decreases installation time but also provides a better seal between the blocks 50A, 50B and the tank (not shown). Whereas before, a minor mismeasurement, placing the openings too close together or too far apart, meant that at least one block was not perfectly aligned with the center line of the tube 11, or worse, both blocks were misaligned. Misalignment has been shown to disrupt the ability of seals 30 and 62 to each seal or provide a proper seal. Therefore, adjustability eases installation by permitting an installer to more or less “eye nail” the location of the openings, along with the additional benefit of promoting a better seal throughout as the parts maintain preferred alignment. As stated previously in terms of different embodiments within the purview of the present invention, either tune end 18 or 20, or both, may have a groove of a predetermined height permitting adjustment of the associated block.
Moreover, based upon the slip fit relationship between the first groove 22, the o-ring 30 and the channel 70 of the nipple 52A, and also the relationship between the second groove 24, the o-ring 30 and the channel 70 of the nipple 52B, a hermetic closure is formed with minimal or no mechanical stresses resulting on the inspection tube 11. By greatly decreasing the radial stresses imparted upon the inspection tube 11, the expected life of the tube 11 is thereby increased.
A second important aspect of the invention relates to the formation of the inwardly tapered, recessed bevels 60 and their cooperating coaxial bores 56. As shown in
Also, of particular importance is the above described interference fit between the seal 62 and an outwardly extending flange, which may be in the form of the innermost bolt thread 96. As best seen in
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21836 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1858 | A |
480736 | McGrory | Aug 1892 | A |
680993 | Flinn | Aug 1901 | A |
707943 | Rockwell | Aug 1902 | A |
986199 | Moser | Mar 1911 | A |
1164484 | Ernst | Dec 1915 | A |
1406926 | Bryan | Feb 1922 | A |
1508272 | Cuff | Sep 1924 | A |
1989167 | Dohrmann | Jan 1935 | A |
2160754 | Ross | May 1939 | A |
2584446 | Hastings et al. | Feb 1952 | A |
2607226 | Biscoe | Aug 1952 | A |
2842089 | Midkiff | Jul 1958 | A |
3150524 | Arens | Sep 1964 | A |
3154945 | Busillo | Nov 1964 | A |
3212334 | Conlon | Oct 1965 | A |
3219071 | Ferster | Nov 1965 | A |
3292434 | McDaniel | Dec 1966 | A |
3390463 | Hirsch | Jul 1968 | A |
3455163 | Lukas et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3540276 | Lyden | Nov 1970 | A |
3596939 | Gibson | Aug 1971 | A |
3835708 | Gruett | Sep 1974 | A |
3886796 | Gruett | Jun 1975 | A |
4050305 | Evans et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4154103 | Fling | May 1979 | A |
4345468 | Jackson | Aug 1982 | A |
4821587 | Rogers | Apr 1989 | A |
5052224 | Ford et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5323653 | Gruett | Jun 1994 | A |
5379913 | Rieke et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6532815 | Wech | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6758092 | Wech et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6857315 | Mills et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6928716 | Wech et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7314237 | Warden | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7574912 | Fling et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20070234798 | Fling et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1133798 | Nov 1968 | GB |
WO8404163 | Oct 1984 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150114109 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |