It is obvious that there would be an advantage in having jewelry—rings, bracelets, necklaces and the like—that are adjustable in length, diameter, etc.
For the jeweler, it would mean that these items can be inventoried as one size fits all.
For the wearer, if the means used for adjustment were simple enough, it would mean that as the size of fingers or wrists change with age or weight, the size of a ring or necklace could be adjusted by the wearer, thus eliminating the need to go back to the jeweler. One could even decide in an instant to wear a ring on a different finger. It is not unknown for it being necessary for a ring to be cut off the wearer. There are some people that cannot realistically wear rings at all due to proportionately large digital bone joints between the middle phalanx and proximal phalanx; those individuals would be able to enjoy the novel experience of wearing such jewelry on their fingers.
It would also mean that as styles change, or particular clothing is worn for a specific occasion, or even on whim, the wearer could change the length of a necklace or earrings. It would actually be exciting if the wearer could easily make the changes while actually wearing the piece—changing one's appearance while looking at one's self in a mirror or even during a short reparation in the middle of an occasion.
The prior art includes many patents on expandable, adjustable jewelry, but the means used to accomplish expandability and adjustability are somewhat primitive, and, most importantly, do not allow an adjustment to be quickly made or even while the piece of jewelry is being worn.
From 1882 (U.S. Pat. No. 0,263,920 to LaGrange) until the present, expandable rings and bracelets have used the rack and pinion principle or derivatives and/or more chic versions thereof. Recently these include—only as examples among many—U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,067 (1975) [Rumbaugh], U.S. Pat. No. 4,753,087 (1988) [D'Annunzio], U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,956 (1995) [Levy], U.S. Pat. No. 5,419,159 (1995) [Muller], U.S. Pat. No. 5,605,059 (1997) [Woodward], U.S. Pat. No. 6,032,485 (2000) [Steinberg], and U.S. Pat. No. 6,085,550 (2000) [Ishida].
U.S. Pat. No. 6,442,970 (2002) [Dangelmayer, et al], uses more sophisticated means to the end, but does not deliver the advantages of the current invention.
The jewelry described herein uses a linear series of interconnected and rotatable rhombuses to make adjustability of length or size possible.
In this instance, some detailed description of certain aspects of the drawings will make the context of the invention clearer.
Referring to the drawings,
The invention employs a linear series of interconnected and rotatable rhombuses to make the piece of jewelry expandable and contractible.
Referring once again to
Referencing
Continuing to reference
It is important that the wearer be able to easily change the length of the piece of jewelry, but that the length of jewelry not change when the wearer does not want it to do so. Referring to
The holes can be any shape as long as the third portion of a pin will pass through the hole in the bottom linear element. While there would be no reason to do so, the holes in the bottom linear element could be of various shapes in any one piece of jewelry as long as the bottom section of any given pin would pass through the corresponding hole. By analogy the same would be true of the top linear element, as long as the second portion of the pin passes through the corresponding hole in the top linear element.
In practice it has been found that a square third portion, 40c of the pin, 30, as shown in
A rhombus is a quadrilateral, or parallelogram, with equal sides. The total of the internal angles is fixed at 360°. The opposite angles of a rhombus are the same and opposing sides of a rhombus are parallel to each other.
As noted earlier,
When it is stated that the expansion or contraction is made by application of linear force, this includes such force when applied circumferentially
Referring again to
The underlying object being a piece of jewelry, stones or other decoration will usually be needed. The means of doing this is shown in
To form a piece of jewelry a plurality of interconnected rhombuses is required and if the piece of jewelry is circular, such as a ring or bracelet, the ends must be connected. This is shown in
In the piece of jewelry shown in
The embodiments of the invention have been shown at a particular width. If a greater width is desired, longer linear elements with an increased number of holes and points of attachments-are required.
The piece of jewelry can be made of any sturdy material, such as silver, that will withstand the forces applied to expand or contract the same.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
215461 | Kayser | May 1879 | A |
263920 | La Grange | Sep 1882 | A |
289511 | Danziger | Dec 1883 | A |
794193 | Sommer | Jul 1905 | A |
837004 | Sommer | Nov 1906 | A |
2401022 | Saccoccio | May 1946 | A |
2444684 | Vastano | Jul 1948 | A |
2515817 | Augenstein | Jul 1950 | A |
2564652 | Templeman | Aug 1951 | A |
2601094 | Corbi | Jun 1952 | A |
2636359 | Sand | Apr 1953 | A |
2695493 | Pinson | Nov 1954 | A |
2713766 | Saccone | Jul 1955 | A |
2790302 | Minematsu | Apr 1957 | A |
2825201 | Dansereau | Mar 1958 | A |
2826900 | Augenstein | Mar 1958 | A |
2901895 | Augenstein et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
3135086 | Shibuya | Jun 1964 | A |
3304109 | Schuster | Feb 1967 | A |
3396996 | Raptis | Aug 1968 | A |
3456972 | Drotar | Jul 1969 | A |
3910067 | Rumbaugh | Oct 1975 | A |
4747724 | Nishikawa et al. | May 1988 | A |
4753087 | D'Annunzio | Jun 1988 | A |
5412956 | Levy | May 1995 | A |
5419159 | Muller | May 1995 | A |
5605059 | Woodward | Feb 1997 | A |
6032485 | Steinberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6085550 | Ishida | Jul 2000 | A |
6442970 | Dangelmayer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7101110 | LaPointe | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20040052581 | Assler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
UK Garden Fencing (Climbing Trellis—Expandable) internet website www.ukgardenfencing.co.uk/acatalog/info—93.html. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120279256 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |