The present invention relates generally to the field of audio reproduction, and, more particularly, to loudspeakers and subwoofers.
A loudspeaker is a device that changes electrical signals into audible sounds. Its design is an important determinant of overall performance of an audio reproduction system. In choosing a particular loudspeaker design, engineers balance many competing considerations. Such considerations include frequency range of the loudspeaker, in-band amplitude and phase distortions, efficiency, and the so-called “Q” factor. The following paragraphs briefly discuss these considerations.
The frequency range of the loudspeaker should cover at least some portion of the audible frequency band, which extends from about 20 Hz to about 20 KHz. Generally, the wider the frequency range of the loudspeaker within the audible frequency band, the better. Because of the difficulty of designing high-quality speakers covering broad frequency ranges, some systems employ dedicated loudspeakers for reproduction of the low-end frequencies, in addition to other loudspeakers used for reproduction of mid-range and higher frequencies. The dedicated low-end loudspeakers, often referred to as woofers or subwoofers, typically cover the frequency range of between about 20 Hz and about 120 Hz.
Distortion means unwanted alteration of a waveform. Therefore, both phase distortion and amplitude distortion (also known as ripple), should be minimized to reproduce the original sound more authentically.
Efficiency is the ratio of the acoustic energy generated and radiated by the loudspeaker to the total electric energy delivered to the loudspeaker. Maximizing loudspeaker efficiency is important for several reasons. First, the higher is the efficiency, the lower is the required output power rating of the amplifier (or another source) driving the loudspeaker. Second, the power that is not radiated is converted into heat, which has to be removed from the loudspeaker, lest the loudspeaker overheat. And, of course, the consumption of the electric power by itself can be an important design factor, particularly for portable audio systems.
The Q factor is the ratio of the reactance and resistance of the electrical circuit model of the loudspeaker. Many loudspeakers operate with the Q factor in the range from about 0.2 to about 1.2. Musical speakers typically have the Q factor of about 0.6-0.7, while more accurate or “tight” speakers have the Q factor approaching 1.0-1.1. The Q factor range of about 0.2 to about 1.2 is rather subjective, but generally provides a relatively flat response curve. In contrast, other loudspeakers operate with higher Q factors. Their efficiencies are lower and their sound is typically more “booming” and distorted.
A typical dynamic loudspeaker includes an electrodynamic motor and a diaphragm, also known as a cone. The motor of the loudspeaker includes wire or voice coil windings on a former. The coil windings and the former slide along a cylindrical pole piece in a magnetic field generated by a permanent magnet. The former is mechanically coupled to the diaphragm. When an electrical current flows through the voice coil, the coil moves under influence of the Lorentz electromotive force exerted by the magnetic field of the permanent magnet on the charged particles flowing in the windings of the voice coil. The diaphragm moves together with the coil, creating variable acoustic pressure that reproduces the sound represented by the current.
The efficiency of the dynamic loudspeaker with a moving voice coil is low for at least two reasons. First, the movement of the diaphragm “pushes out” the air on one side (e.g., the front), while “pulling in” the air on the opposite side (e.g., the back). The two movements tend to cancel each other, unless the loudspeaker is placed within an enclosure. When the loudspeaker is placed in an enclosure, the movement of the diaphragm increases and decreases the volume within the enclosure, corresponding to the movement of the diaphragm out and into the enclosure, respectively. The changes in the volume of the enclosure generate changes in the air pressure within the enclosure, which must be counteracted by the diaphragm. This condition exists in both sealed and vented enclosures, and creates an additional load on the diaphragm and on the motor. The additional load consumes energy and lowers the efficiency of the loudspeaker.
Second, air density is low. Therefore, the voice coil needs to drive a large diaphragm surface at a high velocity to radiate significant acoustical pressures. The structural integrity required by a large, fast moving diaphragm necessitates a sturdy construction of the diaphragm and its supporting structure. The combined mass of the diaphragm and the supporting structure is large in comparison to the mass of the air moved. Essentially, a heavy diaphragm must be moved to push a small mass of air. In technical terms, the acoustic impedance of the diaphragm is much higher than the impedance presented by the moving air.
For a fixed loudspeaker enclosure volume, efficiency increases with the increase in the low corner cutoff frequency (fc) of the loudspeaker. This relationship is known as Hoffman's Iron Law. Stating this law differently, for a given volume of the enclosure, increasing efficiency will generally increase the low corner cutoff frequency fc of the loudspeaker, diminishing the loudspeaker's low frequency response.
Increasing loudspeaker efficiency also decreases the Q factor of the loudspeaker. Recall that a decrease in the Q factor may make the loudspeaker less accurate.
An increase in loudspeaker efficiency can thus entail a performance penalty, particularly when it is achieved without a corresponding increase in the volume of the loudspeaker's enclosure. Moreover, efficiency is not the end all and be all of the loudspeaker design; high efficiency may not even be needed in some applications. For example, an amplifier driving the loudspeaker may have the capacity to drive a low-efficiency loudspeaker with a signal sufficient to reproduce sound with the required volume, and the installed environment of the loudspeaker may provide abundant ventilation for cooling. In this case, loudspeaker efficiency can be sacrificed to obtain a better low frequency response and more authentic sound reproduction capability of the audio system. Conversely, performance may have to be sacrificed for the sake of efficiency where a predetermined sound level has to be obtained from a relatively weak amplifier/driver, especially in a small enclosure. It follows that a loudspeaker with fixed design parameters—including efficiency—may not be the optimum device for a particular system. In fact, such a loudspeaker may not even provide the minimum acceptable performance level required by the system.
Sound preferences are no less subjective than beauty which, according to a well-known expression, resides in the eye of the beholder. Some listeners prefer “tight” loudspeakers, while others favor musical loudspeakers. The ability to tune the sound of an audio system, beyond simple treble, bass, and other equalizer adjustments, would be a valuable feature of a loudspeaker.
Vendors of loudspeakers, and particularly of subwoofers, often require custom-made enclosures to match the parameters of the loudspeaker motor structure. (A motor structure may include a voice coil, magnet, diaphragm, and related components.) It would be desirable to be able to match the motor structure of a loudspeaker to a range of enclosures, rather than limiting the motor structure to a custom-made enclosure.
A need thus exists for a loudspeaker that can be adapted to various installed environments. A further need exists for a loudspeaker that can be customized for installations within enclosures of various sizes. A still further need exists for a loudspeaker with adjustable sound reproduction characteristics.
The present invention is directed to apparatus that satisfies these needs. The apparatus disclosed is a loudspeaker with a basket, a spider attached to the basket, a movable diaphragm, a pole piece, a magnet, a front plate, and upper and lower back plates. The pole piece has a top end with cylindrical walls elongated along a center line axis of the pole piece. The cylindrical walls have at least one irregularity, i.e., a slot or a protrusion. The pole piece also has a base with a base diameter larger than diameter of the top end.
The magnet has an annular shape with first and second relatively flat magnet surfaces normal to the center line axis. A magnet opening extends along the axis in the middle of the magnet.
The front plate has first and second front plate surfaces normal to the axis, and a front plate opening extending along the axis between the first and second front plate surfaces. At least one front plate irregularity exists on the walls of the opening. The second front plate surface is attached to the first magnet surface. The front plate is also attached to the basket.
The upper back plate has first and second upper back plate surfaces normal to the axis, and an upper back plate opening extending along the axis between the first and second upper back plate surfaces. This opening is divided into (1) a first space with a first dimension (near the first upper back plate surface), and (2) a second space with a second dimension (near the second upper back plate surface). The second dimension and the base diameter are each larger than the first dimension. The first surface of the upper back plate is attached to the second surface of the magnet.
The lower back plate is attached to the second upper back plate surface, creating a partially enclosed chamber in the second space of the upper back plate. The base of the pole piece is positioned in this chamber, while the top end of the pole piece is positioned in the front plate opening, forming a gap between the top end and the front plate. A magnetic field extends through this gap.
The voice coil includes a former and wire windings capable of receiving an electrical driving current. It is positioned on the top end of the pole piece, in the magnetic field of the gap. The voice coil's former is attached to both the spider and the diaphragm, and drives the diaphragm when the voice coil slides along the top end under influence of an electromotive force resulting from interaction of the magnetic field in the gap and the driving current. Movements of the diaphragm create acoustic pressure changes, i.e., sounds generated by the loudspeaker.
The lower and upper back plates are capable of both loose and tight attachment to each other. When these components are loosely attached, the base of the pole piece can be rotated around the axis relative to the front plate. Such rotation changes the spacial relationship of the irregularities of the pole piece and the front plate, and, consequently, the strength of the magnetic field in the gap. Therefore, the rotation changes the parameters of the loudspeaker. When the lower and upper back plates are tightly attached, the pole piece is fixed in place and prevented from rotating under expected operational and environmental conditions of the loudspeaker.
Another loudspeaker in accordance with the present invention includes a basket, a diaphragm, a spider attached to the basket, an annular magnet, a magnetic pole piece, front and back plates, a non-magnetic center thread piece, and a voice coil.
The pole piece has a cylindrical top end elongated along a center line axis, and a bottom end with an aperture extending along the axis.
The magnet is annular in shape, with first and second relatively flat surfaces normal to the axis.
The magnetic front plate, attached to the frame, includes a first and second front plate surfaces normal to the axis, and a front plate opening extending along the center line axis between the first and second front plate surfaces. The second front plate surface is attached to the first magnet surface.
The magnetic back plate includes a first and second back plate surfaces normal to the axis, and a back plate opening extending along the axis between the first and second back plate surfaces. The back plate opening is divided into a first space with a first dimension, e.g., a diameter of a circle, and a second space with a second diameter. The first space is nearer the first back plate surface than the second back plate surface, while the second space is nearer the second back plate surface than the first back plate surface. The walls of the second space are threaded.
The non-magnetic center thread component has an inner part positioned in the aperture of the pole piece, and a jutting part protruding from the aperture. The jutting part has a thread matching the thread on the walls of the second space, and is threaded into the second space. The top end of the pole piece, which is attached to and supported by the inner part of the center thread component, is positioned in the front plate opening, forming a first gap between itself and the front plate.
The voice coil has a former and wire windings capable of receiving electrical driving current. The coil is attached to the spider and to the diaphragm, sliding on the top end of the pole piece, in the first gap. An electromotive force generated by interaction of the driving current and the magnetic field in the first gap causes the coil to slide on the top end. The diaphragm moves with the coil, creating acoustic pressure changes.
When the center thread component is rotated within the back plate, the engaged threads on the jutting part and on the walls of the second space cause the center thread component to move along the center line axis. The pole piece moves together with the center thread component, thereby varying the width of a second gap between the pole piece and the back plate. Magnetic coupling between the pole piece and the back plate also varies with variations in the width of the second gap. The magnetic field in the first gap varies, too: the strength of the magnetic field increases when the pole piece is turned in a first direction to bring the pole piece towards the back plate, and decreases when the pole piece is turned in a second direction to take the pole piece away from the back plate. Because the loudspeaker's parameters depend on the strength of the magnetic field in the first gap, the parameters can be adjusted by rotating the center thread component and changing the width of the second gap.
These and other features and aspects of the present invention will be better understood with reference to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference will now be made in detail to several embodiments of the invention that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, same or similar reference numerals are used in the drawings and the description to refer to same or like parts. The drawings are in simplified form and are not to precise scale. For purposes of convenience and clarity only, directional terms, such as, top, bottom, left, right, up, down, over, above, below, beneath, rear, back, front, horizontal, and vertical may be used with respect to the accompanying drawings. These and similar directional terms should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention in any manner. In addition, certain words, for example, cone and diaphragm, are used interchangeably. No significance should be attached to the use of similar words, rather than the same word, unless the difference between the words is noted or made otherwise clear from the context.
As mentioned in the background section, loudspeaker efficiency (Eff) is the ratio of the radiated acoustic energy to the electric energy delivered to the loudspeaker. If efficiency is very low—which is the usual case for loudspeakers—the total electric power (Pe) dissipated in the loudspeaker is approximated by the ohmic losses in the voice coil: Pc=Rc×i2, where i is the current through the voice coil and Rc is the resistance of the voice coil. The acoustic power (Pa) radiated by the loudspeaker is roughly proportional to the square of the (B×l×i) product: Pa=Kap×(B×l×i)2, where B is the flux density of the magnetic field through which the voice coil travels; l is the length of the wire of the voice coil; and Kap is the acoustic power proportionality constant, reflecting such factors as the moving mass, air density, volume of the enclosure, and area of the diaphragm. The efficiency is thus roughly proportional to the square of the magnetic field flux density B.
In accordance with the present invention, a loudspeaker's efficiency Eff, Q factor, low corner frequency cutofff fc, and other parameters are adjusted by varying the magnetic field flux density (magnetic field strength) B in the gap where the voice coil of the loudspeaker moves.
Referring more particularly to the drawings,
In the loudspeaker motor structure 100, the magnet 140 is made of iron. Alternative compositions for the magnet 140 include, for example, nickel, cobalt, and various alloys of iron, nickel, and cobalt.
Referring now to
As illustrated in
The voice coil 120, including its former 121 and wire windings 122, slides up and down on the cylindrical part 112 of the pole piece 110. When the voice coil 120 is at rest, its position on the pole piece 110 is determined by a spider 170, which is attached to the basket of the loudspeaker, and by the diaphragm 175, which is attached to the basket by a surround. (The surround is not shown in the figures.) The spider 170 is made of a flexible material that can hold the voice coil 120 in place when the voice coil 120 is not driven by an electric current, and yet allows the coil 120 to move under influence of an electromotive force when the voice coil 120 is driven by an electric current. In the motor structure 100, the spider 170 is made of multi-layered fabric. Many other materials are used in place of the fabric in alternative embodiments.
In operation, the voice coil 120 moves in the gap between the pole piece 110 and the circumference of the opening in the plate 130. Because the pole piece 120 and the plates 130 and 150 are made of a magnetic (paramagnetic or ferromagnetic) material—steel in the motor structure 100— the magnetic flux emanated by the magnet 140 extends through this gap. Thus, the electric current flowing through the windings of the voice coil 120 creates the electromotive force that moves the coil. The former 121 of the voice coil 120 is attached to the diaphragm 175, so that the diaphragm 175 moves along with the voice coil 120, translating the movements of the voice coil 120 into acoustic pressure variations.
One of the major parameters determining the strength of the magnetic field in the gap between the front plate 130 and the cylindrical part 112 is the width of the gap, i.e., the distance between the front plate 130 and the cylindrical part 112. This distance depends on the relative positions of the notches 132 on the front plate 130 and the slots 114 on the pole piece 110. If the notches 132 and the slots 114 are disposed opposite one another, the gap is increased where the notches 132 face the slots 114. This is illustrated in
Recall that when the back plate portions 150 and 155 are not held tightly together, the base 111 of the pole piece 110 can be rotated in the partially enclosed chamber above the top surface of the lower back plate portion 155. The pole piece 110 can therefore be rotated around its center line B-B′ in relation to the combination of the lower back plate portion 155, the upper back plate portion 150, the annular magnet 140, and the front plate 130. As discussed above, the rotation of the pole piece 110 varies the effective magnetic field acting on the voice coil 120, and therefore causes the Q factor, the efficiency, and other parameters of the loudspeaker to vary with it. Thus, by rotating the pole piece 110, we can adjust the parameters of the motor structure 100 and of the loudspeaker where the motor structure 100 is installed.
In a modification of the motor structure 100, the front plate rotates around a stationary pole piece. For example, the front plate can be secured to the annular magnet using screws and a number of predrilled holes. To adjust the relative position of the front plate and the pole piece, the screws are removed, the front plate is rotated to a new position, and the screws are re-inserted to attach the front plate to the magnet in the new position. The pole piece in this modification can be integrated with the back plate.
In another modification of the motor structure 100, the notches and the slots are replaced with bulges on the front plate and protrusions on the pole piece. When the notches and the bulges face each other, the magnetic field in the gap increases; when the notches and the bulges do not face each other, the magnetic field decreases. Hereinafter, we will occasionally use “irregularity” to refer generically to a notch, slot, bulge, or protrusion.
In yet another modification of the motor structure 100, the front plate is a part of the magnet 140.
More generally, the magnetic structure of a loudspeaker takes many shapes in different modifications of the motor structure 100. (Magnetic structure means at least one magnetic component that positions one magnetic pole across a gap from a top end of the pole piece, and that magnetically couples one bottom end of the pole piece to the opposite magnetic pole, with the voice coil of the loudspeaker being located in the gap.)
As illustrated in
The center opening of the back plate 750 is divided into a larger aperture 751 at its upper end, and a smaller aperture 752 at its lower end. Walls of the smaller aperture are threaded to match the tread on the protruding portion of the center thread component 790. As shown, the center thread component 790 is threaded into and through the back plate 750, and secured by two locknuts 795 and 796 adjacent to the lower surface of the back plate 750.
A voice coil 720 includes wire windings 721 and a coil former 722. The voice coil 720 slides on the upper portion 714 of the pole piece 710 and, possibly, on the side wall 783 of the sleeve 780. This movement occurs within the magnetic field in the gap 797, between the pole piece 710 and the front plate 730. A spider 770 and a diaphragm 775 locate the voice coil 720 when the voice coil is not subjected to the electromotive force generated by the interaction of the magnetic field in the gap 797 and a current flowing through the windings 721.
Note that when the locknuts 795 and 796 are loosened, the center thread component 790 can rotate within the aperture 752 of the back plate 750. Because the center thread component 790 and the walls of the aperture 752 are both threaded, and their threads are engaged with each other, rotating the center thread component 790 raises or lowers the center thread component 790 and the pole piece 710 attached to it. Raising and lowering the pole piece 710 varies the gap 798 between the pole piece 710 and the surface of the back plate 750.
The pole piece 710 and the plates 730 and 750 are made of steel. In alternative embodiments, these components are made of other ferromagnetic or paramagnetic materials. When the pole piece 710 is lowered to be in contact with the back plate 750, magnetic flux flows substantially unimpeded from the magnet 740 to the front plate 730 and the back plate 750, and from the back plate 750 to the pole piece 710. Magnetic field strength within the gap 797 (between the pole piece 710 and the front plate 730) is then maximized. Once the pole piece 710 is raised above the surface of the back plate 750, the magnetic flux must traverse the gap 798. The wider the gap 798, the more resistance it presents to the magnetic flux, and the smaller the magnitude of the magnetic field strength in the gap 797. Consequently, the parameters of the motor structure 700 can be adjusted by loosening the locknuts 795 and 796, rotating the center thread component 790 to obtain the desired parameters of the motor structure 700, and re-tightening the locknuts 795 and 796 to fix the center thread component 790 in the new position.
This document describes the inventive adjustable loudspeakers and some of their features in considerable detail for illustration purposes only. Neither the specific embodiments of the invention as a whole, nor those of its features limit the general principles underlying the invention. The invention is not limited to the particular component arrangements and methods for changing motor structure geometry, but includes all component arrangements and methods used to change the geometry of the motor structure in order to vary the magnetic field acting on the voice coil. A range of component attachment methods and utilizations of various magnetic and non-magnetic materials also fall within the intended scope of the invention. The specific features described herein may be used in some embodiments, but not in others, without departure from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth. Indeed, some of the components employed in the described embodiments can be omitted altogether. Many additional modifications are intended in the foregoing disclosure, and it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that, in some instances, certain features of the invention will be employed in the absence of a corresponding use of other features. The illustrative examples therefore do not define the metes and bounds of the invention and the legal protection afforded the invention, which function has been assigned to the claims and their equivalents.