Not Applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Field of Invention
This invention relates to an improved cracking device, and more specifically to a new nutcracker which is adjustable to prevent the scattering of shells and hulls and to eliminate smashing the kernel of nuts and pinching fingers in the cracking operation.
Prior Art
Various non-adjustable nutcrackers capable of cracking nuts of different sizes and shapes are known in the art and are shown in, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 509,412 (Lee), U.S. Pat. No. 461,377 (Law), U.S. Pat. No. 454,036 (Tse) and others. There are also nutcrackers that are adjustable to accommodate nuts of various sizes and shapes in the art and are shown, for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,173,825 (Papalardo), U.S. Pat. No. 3,148,718 (Plott), U.S. Pat. No. 2,758,622 (Blatt), U.S. Pat. No. 2,444,634 (Daniel), U.S. Pat. No. 2,031,189 (Stromberg), U.S. Pat. No. 1,938,733 (Walling), U.S. Pat. No. 1,281,575 (Ives), and others. The design of all these prior art cracking devices is such that they generally are prone to causing the scattering of shells and hulls and smashing the kernel of nuts into small pieces in the cracking operation, because none of them has the capability of controlling the pressure over the nut in a cracking operation. Due to the lack of mechanism to control the pressure, improper use of some of the existing nutcrackers may result in pinching one's finger(s) when one attempts to squeeze too hard or put one's finger(s) in between the handles either inadvertently or in an attempt to obtain the optimum pressure in the cracking operation.
There is a nutcracker probably capable of limiting the scattering of shells and hulls known in the art and is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,804,111 (Burchett). But the Burchett patented cracking device does not solve the problem of smashing the kernel of nuts. Additionally, as its positioning screw is pressed directly against nut shell or hulls, it is prone to damages with use due to the direct pressure the screw surface receives in the cracking operation. Further, as the Burchett cracking device has a crushing chamber designed to house round-shaped nuts, other oddly-shaped nuts as well as other hard-shelled edibles such as lobster or crab claws will not fit into the chamber, as a result, the utility of the Burchett cracking device is limited.
In accordance with the embodiment, a nutcracker comprises a screw mounted through a threaded hole on one handle next to the connecting rivet of the clamp type nutcracker, such screw limits the travel distance between nutcracker handles when the nutcracker handles are being squeezed in a cracking operation.
The embodiment of my invention is illustrated in
The manner of using this nutcracker is as follows:
First, put the hand tighten screw in the non-engaged state as in
Second, begin tightening the hand tighten screw to have its end going towards touching against the inner surface of the other handle as in
Third, stop tightening the hand tighten screw where the space between the crushing surface and the nut's hull is approximately the same as the thickness of the hull of the nut, normally said space would be between approximately 1-2 mm as in
Fourth, hold the nut with fingers of the other hand to keep the nut within and/or from falling out of the crushing area.
Finally, squeeze the handles to start the crushing operation.
There are various possibilities with regard to the outcome when the hand tighten screw is so engaged in a crushing operation. If the hull of the nut is crushed into small pieces and even the kernel of the nut is also crushed into pieces, this means the hand tighten screw is inadequately “tightened” causing a too big a space between the crushing surface and the hull of the nut, some further “tightening” of the hand tighten screw is needed to reduce the space to achieve the desirable outcome, namely, just crushing the hull lightly or enough to break it into two or a few large pieces without breaking the kernel. If the hull of the nut is barely broken or result in merely visible cracks on the hull yet the cracks are not big enough to break the hull easily with fingers to take out the kernel, this means the space between the crushing surface and the hull of the nut is too small, some “untightening” of the screw is needed to enlarge the space between the crushing surface and the hull, this increased space will obtain a broken hull with large pieces or with such cracks that one can easily break the nut hull to obtain the kernel as a whole piece which is the intended outcome of this invention.
From the description above, a number of advantages of the embodiment of my invention become evident:
(a) The hand tighten screw of my nutcracker through controlling the pressure or the crushing extent of the nut's shell or object to be crushed is to receive effectively eliminates the scattering around of crushed shells/hulls when the kernel and the hull are smashed into many small pieces (very common for baked nuts) commonly associated with the use of conventional hand-held plyer type cracking devices when the handles are squeezed hard in the cracking operation. Thus, there will be no mess scene throughout the cracking operation.
(b) The hand-tighten-screw-regulated pressure or extent of crushing will result in the hull or shell of a nut or the object to be crushed being broken into just a few large pieces or with such large cracks as to enable easy peeling off the hull with fingers, the kernel shall remain whole for optimum consumption.
(c) The engagement of the hand tighten screw in the cracking operation will work to maintain a safe distance between the two handles of the nutcracker as shown in
(d) The length of hand tighten screw makes the nutcracker versatile in cracking nuts of various sizes and shapes, e.g., a smaller nut such as the hazel nut as shown in
(e) The pliers type nutcracker can also be used in cracking other hard shell edibles such as crab or lobster claws.
Accordingly, the reader will see that the nutcracker can be used to crack hard shell edibles of various types and shapes easily and safely, it will eliminate any messy site as a result of excessively crushed hull/shell and kernel pieces common with conventional plyer type nutcrackers, and keep the kernel in one whole piece for optimum consumption.
Although the description above contains some specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiment but merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments. Thus the scope of the embodiment should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.