The present invention relates to under-dash pedal systems for vehicle control, and more particularly relates to adjustable foot pedals that are adjustable relative to a seated person in a vehicle for optimal positioning and function.
Adjustable foot pedal systems for control of vehicles are known. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 3,828,625. However, improvements are desired to allow linear adjustment of the pedals so that a location of the pedals to the vehicle floor and to the driver can be more appropriately controlled. For example, it is desirable to adjust the pedals in a manner that is most similar to adjusting a vehicle seat, since linearly adjusting a vehicle seat relative to foot pedals is widely accepted by the public and government regulators. However, a problem may result if the pedals are linearly adjusted, because with conventional thinking, this requires that the actuators (e.g. push rods, cables, and mechanical linkages) connecting the pedals to the associated vehicle components (e.g. a master brake cylinder, an engine throttle, or a clutch) be lengthened or shortened as the pedals are adjusted. Some designers are hesitant to make a length of actuators adjustable because this can introduce play, wear, and reduced reliability into the actuator. Nonetheless, there are potential cost savings if foot pedals are made adjustable instead of a vehicle seat being adjustable on a floor pan of the vehicle.
Even if the above challenges are overcome, the adjustable pedal system must be able to meet certain functional criteria. For example, the braking pedal must be able to withstand significant loads and torsional stress that occurs during hard braking of the vehicle. Further, the accelerator and brake pedal systems should preferably position the accelerator pedal and the brake pedal at the same relative positions after an adjustment, so that the driver does not mis-hit or have other problems when quickly switching from one pedal to the other. At the same time, the accelerator and brake pedal systems must be relatively simple, reliable, and very durable for long use. Another problem is caused by horizontally/rearwardly extending and protruding objects. It is undesirable to incorporate such protruding objects under an instrument panel or dash, especially in a relatively low position, where they can cause leg and knee injury during a vehicle crash. Also, there is not much room under an instrument panel, such that any pedal system must take up a minimum of space.
It is noted that vehicle brake pedals undergo a high number of low-stress cycles of use during normal braking, and further periodically undergo a significant number of high stress incidents, such as during emergency braking. Historically, loose joints and wear were not a problem, since stiff brake pedal levers were simply pivoted to a durable vehicle-attached bracket by a high-strength lubricious pivot pin. However, adjustable pedal systems have introduced additional joints and points of potential durability problems, as discussed below.
It is further noted that one reason that many vehicle manufacturers are now considering adjustable foot pedals is because there are advantages of improved air bag safety and lower cost to adjusting the location of pedals instead of moving a steering column, vehicle seat, and/or occupant. However, this has introduced joints and components into the brake pedal system that were not previously present. For example, in an adjustable pedal system where a linear adjustment device is introduced between the pedal lever and the pedal pivot, the adjustment device must be made of a first track component attached to the pedal lever and a second track component attached to the pedal pivot, all of which must be attached and adjustably interconnected in a manner that does not become loose over time under either low-cycle high stress or high-cycle intermediate stress. Further, all components in the system must provide consistently high bending or torsional strength, despite dimensional and other manufacturing variations. At the same time, the joints must preferably be simple, low cost, reliable, effective, robust, and readily manufacturable.
One more subtle problem with existing adjustable pedals which are designed for linear travel is that while they are able to effectively withstand the forces applied directly for and aft when applying the brake, they are often relatively weak when a load or force is applied in a cross-car (side-to-side) direction. The pedals typically have excess and undesirable lash or looseness in the side-to-side direction and are subject to failure under relatively low loads. Further, they are subject to customer complaint and/or poor “feel” during use.
Additionally, due to the inability of current linear adjustment mechanisms to withstand lateral loading and high torsional loads, the pedal beams and pads must be located just under the adjustment mechanism with little offset side-to-side, so that minimal torque is applied to the adjustment mechanism. In today's vehicle designs, and in particular with smaller vehicles, there are often many obstructions under the vehicle dash, such as the steering column, and limited room for location of the adjustment mechanism. Therefore, there is often a need for the pedal beam and pad to be offset from the adjustment mechanism to fit into limited available space. This offset may put a large torsional load on the adjustment mechanism, which must have the ability to resist the load without chance of failure and without lash or looseness in the system. Additionally, to keep the loads and stresses to a minimum on the pedal adjustment mechanism, it is desirable in current linear adjustment systems to locate the adjustment mechanism as low as possible in the vehicle to reduce the moment arm and stress induced in the adjustment mechanism. This further places limitations on the flexibility of the system to package or fit in tight vehicle spaces under the dash.
The present inventive system is designed to overcome the problems described above and which are experienced with existing adjustable pedal systems. Because of the unique channel design, it is able to resist very large lateral and torsional loads. The benefit of this is that the present inventive system has very little looseness or lash. It can easily withstand large fore-aft and lateral loads with little deflection, looseness, or failure. Additionally, the pedal can be offset by as much as 70 mm in a side-to-side direction, which gives the vehicle designers great flexibility in designing a pedal system around the many obstructions in a vehicle, especially smaller vehicles. Another benefit of the present inventive system, is that the adjustment mechanism can be located relatively high in the pedal support bracket as the system is able to withstand the high loading resulting from a long pedal beam or from the large torsional loading condition. This provides great flexibility for packaging in the vehicle.
One problem typical with many adjustable pedal systems, is that the loads or forces applied to the pedals, are transferred through and resisted by the adjustment mechanism drive gears. Ideally, the adjustment mechanism gears would be designed for the sole purpose of moving the pedal in the fore-aft positions and would not take a lot of load from the application of the pedal. They could then be designed small and very economically. But when the adjustment mechanism gears must also be designed to resist the forces applied on the pedal, they must be designed large and strong enough to withstand tremendous loads that are applied to the pedal. This will add cost and complexity to the gears and will create a condition where they are subject to failure or unnecessary wear.
There are at least two types of pedal systems. One is a pivoting system which adjusts the fore-aft position of the pedal by rotation of the pedal around a pivot in the pedal support bracket. Because of the relatively short radius of the arc or radius of travel (typically 225-325 mm), the pedal will change its height relative to the floor by as much as 20 mm when traveling a fore-aft distance of 75 mm as the pedal moves about the arc. Additionally, the angle of the pedal can change as much as 12-15 degrees. Although this type of system may be relatively small and easy to package in a vehicle environment, the large change in height of the pedal relative to the floor, and the large change in angle of the pedal pad, may cause confusion of the driver or undesirable positioning of the foot on the pedal.
Another type of system adjusts the pedal linearly. An adjustable pedal system, which adjusts the pedal position in a linear fashion, can move in the fore-aft direction a distance of 75 mm with no change in height relative of the pedal to the floor, if desired. This is clearly an advantage to the designers of a vehicle as the pedal travel can be designed for optimum comfort and ergonomics of the driver. Unfortunately, these systems require a large adjustment mechanism, which is often difficult to fit or package in many vehicles. Further, such systems include components elongated in a rearward horizontal direction toward a vehicle drive, which can be undesirable.
The inventive adjustable pedal systems described below include a track and follower, and further include polymeric bearing shoes therebetween to provide a smooth sliding motion. Because of the high torsional stresses on these pedals, particularly on brake pedals, it is difficult to design a low cost solid bearing that is sufficiently tight to not be sloppy, yet that is able to be assembled easily. Further, the bearing shoe should not wear and become sloppy over time, even under high stress and/or high cycle use. Further, it is desirable that the present bearing provide a consistent low level of friction to help keep the pedal in an adjusted position, so that other components do not absorb all of this stress.
Accordingly, an apparatus solving the aforementioned problems and having the aforementioned advantages is desired.
In one aspect of the present invention, an adjustable pedal apparatus includes a support configured for attachment to a vehicle, and a pedal-supporting subassembly with an upper portion pivotally engaging the support, a lower portion supporting a pedal construction, and a track adjustment mechanism connecting the upper and lower portions. The track adjustment mechanism includes a track defining at least one guide channel extending horizontally, and a follower slidably engaging the track. The follower includes a bearing shoe made of bearing material that is located in and slidably engages the channel. The bearing shoe includes a body and a resilient portion spaced from the body and engaging the track located in the channel. The resilient portion is flexed and at least partially compressed so that the bearing shoe takes up any slack and sloppiness between the track and follower. The apparatus also includes an adjuster for adjusting the pedal construction along the track mechanism, and an actuator coupled to the pedal-supporting member and adapted for operative connection to a control system of a vehicle for operating the control system when the pedal-supporting member is moved.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
A pedal-supporting apparatus 20 (
With the present inventive system, there is little or no load that is transferred from the pedal into the drive gears. When a force is applied to the pedal, the force is transferred directly into the follower, which rotates in the track. This rotation locks the follower in the track and the load applied to the pedal is resisted by the track itself, thus eliminating a transfer of high loads to the gears. The gears can then be designed smaller and much more economically. A wider range of material options is then available for the gears including the use of plastic gears. Since the gears can be designed smaller and with a wider selection of materials, it is typically less expensive, more robust, and the system can then be optimized for low noise, which is a key requirement of most automotive companies.
The support 21 (
As noted above, the brake pedal subassembly 22 (
The lower portion 25 of the brake pedal subassembly 22 (
The lower portion 25 is linearly slidably and adjustably connected to the upper portion 24 with a linear adjustment mechanism 26 (sometimes called an “adjustment device”) that includes the hat-shaped channel 28 (sometimes called a “follower” herein) secured to the top bracket 67, and the C-shaped channel 27 (sometimes called a “guide” or “track”) secured to the side flange 59 of the bracket 56. Notably, the illustrated channel 27 is C-shaped, but it is contemplated that other shapes are possible. The C-shaped channel 27 is vertically elongated for beam strength (which is required to withstand a vehicle driver pressing hard on the foot pedal pad 66), and includes top and bottom flanges 73 and 74 that stiffen the channel 27 and that form a concave region defining a track. The hat-shaped channel 28 includes opposing edges 75 and 76 defining a blade-shaped feature that mateably slidably engages the concave region (i.e. the track) defined by the C-shaped channel 27. Lubricious bearing material 77 is attached to the edges 75 and 76 for added long-term durability and for a constant coefficient of friction, if needed. Notably, some friction (i.e., a heightened level of static friction) may be desirable to stabilize the linear adjustment mechanism in an adjusted position. It would be desirable to create a level of static friction that would require a force of between 1 and 40 pounds to slide the follower in the track, preferably a force of between 5 and 20 pounds, and most preferably a force of between 8 and 15 pounds.
The rack 29 has a plurality of teeth and is attached to the hat-shaped channel 28 in a location where the teeth extend parallel the track of channel 27. At the end of the teeth on the rack 29 is a section of material 79 creating a stop for engaging the worm gear 30 in an abutting manner preventing binding. The worm gear 30 is operably attached to the C-shaped channel 27 by a bearing that holds the worm gear 30 in operative contact with the rack 29. A cable assembly (
The motor 40 (
To adjust the brake pedal subassembly, the motor 40 is actuated, and the worm gear 30 rotated until a desired adjusted position is achieved. To use the brake pedal, the vehicle driver presses on the foot pedal pad 66, and the entire brake pedal subassembly 22 (including the upper and lower portions 24 and 25) rotate as a unit, thus pushing the push rod to operate the master brake cylinder of the vehicle brake system.
The accelerator pedal subassembly 23 (
Notably, the linear adjustment devices 26 and 34 are positioned high relative to the associated respective pivot pins 55 and 91. In this “high” location, the linear adjustment devices 26 and 34 are tucked up under the instrument panel of the vehicle where they are partially shielded. This improves appearance and safety. The long vertical dimensions of the pedal arms 65 and 92 create substantial torque on the linear adjustment devices 26 and 34 (especially on brake pedal subassembly 22 during hard braking), but the elongated vertical dimension of the linear adjustment devices 26 and 34 provide the torsional resistance to prevent failure and excessive wear. Also, the relatively short horizontal/lateral dimension of the devices 26 and 34 maintain a small envelope, such that a minimum of space is required under the instrument panel to contain them. The elongated vertical dimension of the linear adjustment devices 26 and 34 are typically in the range of 15 to 200 mm, preferably in the range of 25 to 100 mm, and most preferably in the range of 30 to 60 mm.
It is noted that the track 27 can be oriented horizontally or at an angle to horizontal, depending on the vehicle manufacturer's specifications and/or vehicle constraints. In some cases, a horizontal position is most desirable (such as for an accelerator pedal). A non-vertical orientation could provide maximum resistance to force in both a fore-aft application of the pedal and a side-to-side load on the pedal, and also to help facilitate packaging the pedal assembly in the vehicle. The long dimension of the elongated dimension of the linear adjustment device could be positioned in the range of 0 degrees (vertical) to 90 degrees (horizontal), preferably in the range of 0 degrees to 45 degrees, more preferably in the range of 0 degrees to 15 degrees, and most preferably designed vertically.
A modified pedal-supporting apparatus 120 (
The bracket support 121 (
The upper portion 124 (
A flange 138 (
An opening 140 is cut through body 134 at a location generally in the longitudinal center of the track 127. A housing 141 is screw-attached to a side of the body 134 opposite the flanges 135 and 136. A gear member 142 is positioned in the housing 141 and rotatably supported by an axle 143. The gear member 142 includes a first drive gear 144 that extends through the opening 140 and is operably engaged with a rack 145 in the follower 128 as described below, and includes a second gear 146 positioned beside the first gear 144 and also supported on the axle 143. A worm gear 147 is rotatably supported in the housing 141 by cylindrical section 148 at a 90-degree orientation from the axis of the second gear 146 and operably engages the second gear 146. A motor-driven cable 149 (
The worm gear 147 includes an exposed tail end configured to be engaged by a second cable 150, such that the second cable 150 is rotated at the same time and in the same direction as the first cable 149 when the motor is operated. It is contemplated that the second cable 150 can be extended to a second adjustable pedal apparatus similar to apparatus 120. By this means, multiple adjustable pedal apparatus can be simultaneously adjusted.
The lever portion 125 includes a lever 151 attached to the hat-shaped follower 128 by rivets 152 (or by welding or other means). The pedal pad 129 is attached to a lower end of the lever 151. The follower 128 is hat-shaped, and includes a center wall 152, arcuate edge flanges 153 that mateably slidably engage the recesses formed under the L-shaped flanges 135 and 136, and transverse walls 154 that connect the edge flanges 153 to the center wall 152. Plastic bearing caps (see
To adjust the pedal subassembly, the motor is operated to rotate cable 149 and in turn rotate gears 147 and 144 of gear member 142, thus moving follower 128 and lever portion 125 along the arcuate track 127. To use the brake pedal, the vehicle driver presses on the pedal pad 129, causing the lever portion 125 and the upper portion 123 to pivot as a unit about pivot pin 133, thus pushing the push rod toward the master brake cylinder.
Notably, the curved adjustment device 126 (
It is to be understood that different virtual pivot points can be designed into the present device. For example, the virtual pivot 156A illustrates a second location directly above the track 127, which results in the pedal pad 129 moving through an arcuate path segment of about 76 mm where the front and rear positions of the pedal pad 129 are about equal in height. Thus, different vehicle manufacturer specifications can be easily met. Importantly, the chordal longitudinal length of edge flanges 153 of the follower 128 and their engagement with the L-shaped flanges 135 and 136 results in a mechanically advantageous arrangement capable of withstanding substantial torques. This is important because at least one manufacturer specifies that the pedal construction must withstand 300 pounds of force at the brake pad 129. Translating this force through the long torque arm of lever portion 125 to pivot pin 133 and back to the track 127 results in over 2000 pounds of force on the flanges 135 and 136. Thus, length of engagement by the edge flanges 153 on the L-shaped flanges 135 and 136 is important for sufficient torsional strength. In the present arrangement, a chordal length of track 127 that is about 117 mm and a follower length that is about 70 mm provides the necessary strength while still meeting the small volumetric size requirements of most vehicle manufacturers for this device. This compares to a linear track that would have to be about 160-mm or longer in order to provide similar pedal travel.
As noted above, in one aspect, the present invention comprises a new type of adjustable pedal assembly, which includes a virtual pivot. This system includes the best features and benefits of both a pivoting system and a linear travel system. In a virtual pivot system, the fore-aft movement of the pedal is accomplished by a combination of fore-aft travel and radial travel where the radial travel approximates linear travel due to the large virtual radius. It is desirable to design a virtual pivot system where the distance from the pedal to the virtual pivot (virtual radius), is approximately 1.7 times the distance from the centerline of the track to the virtual pivot, or a ratio of 1.7:1. Other ratios are also possible but typically in the range of 1.3:1 to 3:5, preferably in the range of 1.5:1 to 2.5:1, and most preferably in the range of 1.5:1 to 2.0:1. A virtual pivot system will typically have a virtual radius in the range of about 350-800 mm., preferably in the range of 400-700 mm and most preferably in the range of 500-600 mm for most automotive applications. When a virtual pivot system is designed with a 1.73:1 ratio including a virtual radius of 565 mm and a distance of virtual radius to centerline of the track of 326 mm, the assembly can be configured so that there is little change in vertical pedal position as the pedal is adjusted from its full forward to it's full rearward position of approximately 76 mm (similar to
Notably, A system with a virtual pivot is not limited to a system with a C-shaped track. Other configurations are possible. One such configuration is a curved track defined by a curved shaft or rod with a follower defined by a collar that slides over the shaft forward and rearward when driven by a motor and drive gears. Additionally, the collar could be internal of the shaft and slide within the shaft when driven by a motor and drive gears.
A further modified pedal construction 220 (
Bracket support 222 (
The upper pedal member 225 (
The lever mount 228 (
The pedal lever 227 (
The mounting sections 229 and 230 (
The ridge 234 (
In
An important feature of the present adjustment mechanism is the amount of side-to-side lash that is allowable as measured at a bottom of the pedal (i.e. the amount of measured free-play in the cross-car direction). It is advantageous that there be a minimal amount of looseness in the pedal as to not give false information regarding the feedback the pedal gives to an operator. For this reason, free-play control is an important factor in operation of the pedal system. To achieve minimum lash in the pedal assembly, it is necessary to control the clearance between the plastic molded shoe and the machined slot in part 225. This is accomplished by the above-discussed arrangement, including the flexible portions 378, 379 with slots 380, flexible strips 381, and crush ribs 383.
In the foregoing description, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed herein. Such modifications are to be considered as included in the following claims, unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/820,012, filed Mar. 28, 2001, entitled ADJUSTABLE PEDAL APPARATUS now U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,155, which is continuation-in-part of co-assigned application Ser. No. 09/782,561, filed Feb. 13, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,564,672, entitled ADJUSTABLE PEDAL APPARATUS, which in turn claims benefit of provisional applications filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.53(c), including provisional application Ser. No. 60/204,439, filed May 15, 2000, entitled ADJUSTABLE PEDAL APPARATUS, and provisional application Ser. No. 60/254,016, filed Dec. 7, 2000, entitled ADJUSTABLE PEDAL APPARATUS WITH NON-LINEAR ADJUSTMENT PATH. This application is further related to co-assigned application Ser. No. 09/782,563, filed Feb. 13, 2001, entitled PEDAL WITH TONGUED CONNECTION FOR IMPROVED TORSIONAL STRENGTH.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2585688 | Saulnier | Feb 1952 | A |
2760739 | Reichert | Aug 1956 | A |
2908183 | Giovanni | Oct 1959 | A |
3151499 | Roe | Oct 1964 | A |
3242763 | Buchwald | Mar 1966 | A |
3301088 | White | Jan 1967 | A |
3576302 | Palfreyman | Apr 1971 | A |
3643524 | Herring | Feb 1972 | A |
3643525 | Gibas | Feb 1972 | A |
3691868 | Smith | Sep 1972 | A |
3765264 | Bruhn, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3828625 | Bruhn, Jr. | Aug 1974 | A |
3975972 | Muhleck | Aug 1976 | A |
4353430 | Sjoqvist et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4470570 | Sakurai et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4499963 | Liston | Feb 1985 | A |
4640248 | Stoltman | Feb 1987 | A |
4683977 | Salmon | Aug 1987 | A |
4848708 | Farrell et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4870871 | Ivan | Oct 1989 | A |
4875385 | Sitrin | Oct 1989 | A |
4944269 | Imoehl | Jul 1990 | A |
4958607 | Lundberg | Sep 1990 | A |
4969437 | Kolb | Nov 1990 | A |
4986238 | Terazawa | Jan 1991 | A |
4989474 | Cicotte et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5010782 | Asano et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5056742 | Sakurai | Oct 1991 | A |
5078024 | Cicotte et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086663 | Asano et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5148152 | Stueckle et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5172606 | Dzioba et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5309361 | Drott et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321980 | Hering et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5351573 | Cicotte | Oct 1994 | A |
5460061 | Redding et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5632183 | Rixon et al. | May 1997 | A |
5676220 | Dapsi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697260 | Rixon et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722302 | Rixon et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725184 | Kang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5771752 | Cicotte | Jun 1998 | A |
5819593 | Rixon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823064 | Cicotte | Oct 1998 | A |
5839326 | Song | Nov 1998 | A |
5890399 | Rixon et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5927154 | Elton et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937707 | Rixon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964125 | Rixon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6073515 | Elton et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6109241 | Engelgau | Aug 2000 | A |
6173625 | McFarlane et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178847 | Willemsen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189409 | Neag et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205883 | Bortolon | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209417 | Munger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237565 | Engelgau | May 2001 | B1 |
6247381 | Toelke et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6289763 | Rixon et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293584 | Levine | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315451 | Michioka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324939 | Cicotte | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352007 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367348 | Toelke et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6431022 | Cicotte | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6609438 | Bigham et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20010002556 | Rixon et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010015111 | Rixon et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020002874 | Burton et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020053254 | Rixon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078786 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083789 | Sundaresan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020088299 | Toelke et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020088300 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092374 | Johansson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030099414 | Okabe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2739947 | Oct 1995 | FR |
973638 | Oct 1964 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040003675 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60254016 | Dec 2000 | US | |
60204439 | May 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09820012 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10609988 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09782561 | Feb 2001 | US |
Child | 09820012 | US |