The invention relates to the field of prosthetic devices, and more particularly to an adjustable prosthetic limb system having an adjustable socket system for accommodating a residual limb, an adjustable pylon, and an adjustable foot.
A typical prosthetic leg and foot includes a socket, pylon, and foot. A socket is commonly referred to as the portion of a prosthesis that fits around and envelopes a residual limb or stump, and to which prosthetic components, such as a foot, are attached. When providing a socket to an amputee, it is essential to properly fit the socket and align various parts of the prosthesis to the amputee. Fitting and alignment of the socket and the parts are difficult tasks to perform, and require extensive knowledge, training and skill for the prosthetist.
Typically, sockets for definitive prostheses are customized for a residual limb of a wearer. According to one method, the sockets are formed over a model of the stump, such as one formed by plaster-of-Paris, to be used to distribute forces between the socket and the stump in a comfortable way to the amputee. In another method, the socket may be obtained from computer aided design by modeling the shape of the stump, and subsequently forming a model. Once the model is obtained in either of these methods, a socket is formed over the model by using fabric and liquid plastic resin to obtain a definitive rigid socket customized to a limb.
Proper fitting of a socket to the stump is critical to the success of the prosthesis. The socket must fit closely to the stump to provide a firm connection and support, but must also be sufficiently loose to allow for circulation. In combination with proper fitting, the socket must transfer loads from the residual limb to the ground in a comfortable manner.
Most prosthetic sockets are permanently formed to a customized shape that is static, meaning the socket does not account for shape and volume fluctuations of the residual limb. When there are shape and volume fluctuations, the fitting of the socket is impeded, with these sockets causing discomfort, pain and soft tissue breakdown of the stump. Conventional sockets tend to be bulky and cumbersome to wear, and may be difficult to don making the residual limb uncomfortable when worn.
As to methods of attaching the socket to the residual limb, conventional sockets rely on different mechanisms such as negative pressure or a friction or tension based interface. Conventional sockets may have poor force distribution on the residual limb causing a concentration of pressure on a certain area of the stump. This poor distribution of pressure causes pain, discomfort, and tissue breakdown. Conventional sockets generally are not breathable which results in undesirable temperature and humidity within the socket.
For certain types of amputations such as disarticulation amputations where the limb is separated at a joint, it is difficult to create sockets which are not bulky and provide use of the natural anatomy. Conventional sockets for disarticulation amputations use a rigid socket which requires that the opening for the socket be larger than the joint to allow for donning and doffing. The rigid sockets generally have a general uniform shape which receives a large portion of the residual limb and the space between the residual limb and the interior of the rigid socket wall is filled in with a soft or cushioning material.
Besides the socket, a leg prosthesis includes a prosthetic foot and depending on the level of the amputation, a pylon between the socket and the foot. The length of the pylon must also be customized for the amputee's height and level of amputation. A prosthetist aligns the pylon, the socket, and the foot to minimize undesired forces produced during gait on the user and prosthesis and to provide the user with a more symmetric gait. The alignment of the prosthesis also affects the pressure distribution at the stump and socket interface.
It is desirable to provide a simplified and compact prosthesis system that overcomes the drawbacks over known prosthesis systems. Particularly, it is advantageous to provide a complete prosthetic limb system that is off-the-shelf and capable of accommodating a variety of residual limb sizes. It is also desired a socket system of the prosthetic limb system be adjustable to allow for volume and shape fluctuations, and in effect, provide a dynamic socket as opposed to the known static sockets. The adjustable socket can better adjust for pressure distribution, and maintain comfort to the amputee over a range of care and residual limb conditions. It is further desired that the pylon and the foot of the prosthesis be adjustable to accommodate a variety of users and gaits.
According to an embodiment, the adjustable socket system has a distal end portion having an axis, and a frame has a plurality of elongate fingers longitudinally extending from the distal end portion. Each elongate finger defines at least two segments pivotally connected to one another and extending in a longitudinal direction relative to the distal end portion. The at least two segments are pivotable inwardly or outwardly relative to the axis. At least one elongate element connects to the plurality of elongate fingers and forms part of a circumference of the adjustable socket system in combination with the fingers of the frame. The fingers may be formed from a flexible material such as resin reinforced with carbon fibers.
The distal end portion may define a plurality of base elements extending laterally and extending longitudinally in part to couple to a respective one of the segments of each of the plurality of fingers. The distal end part has a proximal contour adapted to receive a distal end of a residual limb, and sized to accommodate a large variety of differently shape residuums. The plurality of base elements may be rigidly secured to the respective one of the segments of each of the plurality of fingers.
A sleeve has a plurality of pockets wherein each of the pockets extends over a respective one of the plurality of fingers. The sleeve carries the at least one elongate element. The sleeve may be formed from an inelastic textile. The at least one elongate element includes a lace slidably connecting to each of the plurality of pocket, and the at least one elongate element may be a textile lace that is inelastic. Each of the pockets may be slidably removable from the respective one of the plurality of fingers.
According to a variation, the at least one tensioning device is connected to the frame and the at least one elongate element connects to the plurality of fingers to form at least part of the circumference of the socket system. The at least one tensioning device is mounted to the distal end portion below the frame. The at least two segments define a plurality of channels for directing the at least one elongate element along a surface of the at least two segments. The at least two segments define opposed apertures corresponding to opposed side walls and in communication with a respective one of the plurality of channels. The at least one elongate element extends through the opposed apertures.
According to another variation, the at least one elongate element has at least one end adjustably secured to the distal end portion. Adjustment of the at least one elongate element is arranged to change tension in the at least one element.
In another embodiment, an adjustable prosthetic socket system has first and second opposed sides, and includes a socket frame having a first component arranged along a first side of the socket system and a second component arranged along a second side of the socket system. The first component is connected to the second component. A tubular insert is arranged on the interior of the socket frame forming an interior surface of the socket system. At least one tensioning element connects the circumferential insert to at least one of the first component and the second component. At least one tensioner is attached to the at least one tensioning element that draws in and releases the tensioning element to adjust the circumference of at least one area of the socket system. A partial enclosure may laterally extend from each side of the first component.
The adjustable prosthetic socket system may also include a plurality of tensioning element guides arranged longitudinally between the first component and the second component. The at least one tensioner is attached to the second component and the at least one tensioning element connects the plurality of tensioning element guides to the second component. The plurality of tensioning element guides is connected to the tubular insert and the partial enclosure. The first component is an adjustable spine, the second component is a rigid spine, and the tubular insert is flexible.
Other embodiments are presented below in accordance with the description and various drawings.
The inventive adjustable prosthetic limb system is described referring to the accompanying drawings that show preferred embodiments according to the system described. The system as disclosed in the accompanying drawings is illustrated for example only. The elements and combinations of elements described below and illustrated in the drawings can be arranged and organized differently to result in embodiments still within the spirit and scope of the device described.
A better understanding of different embodiments of the invention may be had from the following description read with the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to like elements.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrative embodiments are in the drawings and will be described below. It should be understood, however, there is no intention to limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention covers all modifications, alternative constructions, combinations, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure and defined by the appended claims.
It will be understood that, unless a term is expressly defined in this disclosure to possess a described meaning, there is no intent to limit the meaning of such term, either expressly or indirectly, beyond its plain or ordinary meaning.
Any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specified function, or “step for” performing a specific function, is not to be interpreted as a “means” or “step” clause as specified in 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 6.
The anatomical terms described are not intended to detract from the normal understanding of such terms as readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art of prosthetics. The term “distal” is used to denote the portion or end of a limb farthest from the central portion of the body. The term distal is the opposite of “proximal” which is used to denote that the end or portion of the limb is nearer to the central portion of the body.
Some components described share similarities to components in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,488,349, 7,867,286 and U.S. publication no. 2012/0101597, incorporated by reference and belonging to the assignee of this disclosure.
Embodiments of the adjustable prosthetic limb system will be described herein which comprise a socket, pylon, and prosthetic foot. The adjustable prosthetic limb system is advantageous in that components of the adjustable prosthetic limb system are adjustable and therefore customizable to the user's need and preferences. It is preferred that at least the prosthetic socket is adjustable in the adjustable prosthetic limb system.
Besides using a socket adjustable to the physical features of a residual limb, it also advantageous to have a prosthetic limb which has other adjustable components. The adjustable socket system, such as the embodiments described, may be used with an adjustable pylon and adjustable prosthetic foot to provide the user with a fully adjustable prosthetic limb system. The skilled person would also understand that the embodiments of the adjustable pylon and prosthetic foot as described may be used with a variety of sockets and are not limited to being used with an adjustable socket. The adjustable pylon and prosthetic foot may be used with a suspension socket.
Embodiments of the adjustable prosthetic limb system described are advantageous in that the embodiments of the adjustable prosthetic limb system enable the user to simultaneously adjust the horizontal position of the socket regarding the prosthetic limb, the vertical position of the socket regarding the prosthetic limb, and the angle of the socket regarding the prosthetic limb. The prosthetic foot is furthermore adjustable. The adjustable prosthetic limb system as described provides an off-the-shelf prosthetic limb that delivers a complete, instant prosthesis solution when an amputee has an urgent need for an artificial limb and that can be adapted to a wide range of user needs and preferences.
1. Embodiments of the Adjustable Socket System
The embodiments of the adjustable socket system described are adapted to receive and fit a range of heights and lengths of a residual limb, and accommodate volume and shape fluctuations of a residual limb. From its versatility in fitting and adjustment, and its breathability, the adjustable socket system can decrease pain, discomfort and soft tissue breakdown over known sockets static in size and shape.
The versatility in fitting and adjustment and breathability of the embodiments of the adjustable socket system described is partially attributable to the socket system having an adjustable surface to accommodate specific residual limb shapes which will be described in more detail regarding specific embodiments. To achieve this adjustability, the socket system may have the form of a rigid weight bearing structure adapted to partially surround the residual limb and a flexible structure to support the remaining portion of the residual limb. The flexible structure may be a flexible material such as the tensioning element and/or lateral flaps described below or the system of straps described in U.S. publication no. 2012/0101597. The flexible structure can form the anterior or posterior of the socket system. Meanwhile, the rigid weight bearing structure is also adjustable such that portions of the weight bearing structure may be removed, added, or exchanged with components having different properties.
Under an embodiment of the invention,
Turning to the details of the socket system 10, the socket system 10 has a flexible spine 12 on the anterior side of the socket system 10 and a rigid spine 14 on the posterior side of the socket system 10. Each spine 12, 14 is formed of a plurality of connected vertebrae 16, 18. The vertebrae 16 of the flexible spine 12 can pivot relative to each other to provide the spine 12 with flexibility to adapt to the shape of the residual limb. The vertebrae 18 of the rigid spine 14 are non-pivoting. The socket system 10 also includes a distal base 20.
The socket system 10 is attached to the residual limb using a friction or tension based interface in a tensioning system. In the socket system 10 in
The anterior tensioning element guides 24 and the posterior tensioning element guides 26 are offset to loop the cable 22 around the guides 24, 26 in a zigzagging fashion along the length of the socket system 10 and essentially wrap the residual limb into the socket system 10. The cable 22 and the guides 24, 26 form a pulley-like system for tightening and loosening the adjustable socket system 10 which enables simple tension adjustment along the entire socket system 10. The socket system 10 has a conical or tubular shape, and the cable 22 defines the outer periphery of the socket system 10 and therefore, the circumference of the socket system 10 at various points.
The length of the cable 22 and the pressure applied to the residual limb may be adjusted using one or more tensioners 28. The tensioners may be turned one direction to increase the length of cable 22 and turned a second direction to decrease the length of cable 22.
In the illustrated embodiment of
A complete posterior tensioning element guide 26 is formed by one piece on a posterior vertebra 18 and a corresponding piece on an adjacent posterior vertebra 18. Alternatively, the anterior tensioning element guide may be formed of two pieces. The guides 24, 26 are shown as pins in
The cable 22 may be formed of more than one cable with tensioners 28 arranged to adjust the cable length of certain cables. Through this tensioning system arrangement, the adjustable socket system 10 has a regional circumference adjustment with each tensioner 28 arranged to adjust the tension or circumference of specific areas of the socket system 10 to enable adjustment for a tailored fit of the adjustable socket system 10 to the residual limb.
Using multiple tensioners allows for different tension in different areas or sides of the socket system 10. One tensioner may adjust the circumference or tension of the proximal area of the socket system 10 while another tensioner adjusts the circumference or tension of the distal area of the socket system 10. As depicted in
The socket system 10 may include a material placed between the cable 22 and the residual limb to which the pressure produced by tension in the cable 22 is applied. In this embodiment, lateral or horizontal flaps 30, 32 are attached or incorporated into the vertebrae 16, 18 of the spines 12, 14. The lateral flaps 30, 32 extend part way on each side of the vertebrae 16, 18 between the spines 12, 14 as shown in
As shown in
Besides having an adjustable peripheral surface, the distal base 20 may be formed of two components to have an adjustable length to accommodate smaller or larger residual limbs as described in U.S. publication no. 2012/0101597.
Each anterior vertebra 16 in the flexible spine 12 may have a proximal connector and distal hinge connector as described in U.S. publication no. 2012/0101597 to attach each anterior vertebra 16 to each other. Each posterior vertebra 18 in the rigid spine 14 may have a pair of proximal posts and distal posts as described in U.S. publication no. 2012/0101597 to attach each posterior vertebra 18 to each other.
Similar to the embodiment illustrated in
The socket system 110 has a tensioning element or cable 122 used to adjust the circumference or outer peripheral surface of the socket system 110. The socket system 110 incorporates the tensioning element guides into the interior of the vertebrae or the lateral flaps. As is shown in
The lateral flaps 130, 132 are preferably formed to minimize any gaps between adjacent flaps and maximize surface area of the socket system 110 in contact with the residual limb or prosthetic liner to provide a stronger attachment and better pressure distribution. Material may also be added between the lateral flaps to prevent gaps between adjacent lateral flaps. The lateral flaps may be incorporated into the vertebrae as a single continuous component or may be removable. The lateral flaps preferably have an arcuate shape to conform more closely to the shape of the residual limb and are made of a breathable material such as a textile.
Placing the tensioners 128 of the socket system 110 is customizable as well. Each posterior vertebra 118, which is in more detail in
The rigid spine of the socket systems described may have a flexible proximal aspect which allows for some flexibility of the rigid spine at the proximal end. Vertebrae similar to those used in the flexible spine may be used on the proximal end of the rigid spine to allow for easier flexion of the knee.
The socket system has a tensioner 128 for adjusting the tension and length of a tensioning element such as the cable 122. The socket system 410 has a circular guide 138 integrated into the interior of the posterior vertebrae 118 between each adjacent posterior vertebra 118 which guides the cable 122 through adjacent vertebrae. The circular guides 138 are preferably rotatable to increase the ease with which the tension of the cable 122 may be adjusted. It has been found that the preferred circular guides 138 enable using only one tensioner 128 while still maintaining easy adjustment of cable tension throughout the adjustable socket system 410. The circular guides may also be integrated into the interior of anterior vertebrae 116 or the anterior flaps 130 in place of the anterior guides 124 or the anterior guides 24. The circular guides 138 can be attached to the exterior of the anterior and posterior vertebrae as similarly shown in
The regional circumference adjustment of embodiments of the adjustable socket system described is especially advantageous for disarticulation amputations in which the limb is separated at the joint. A disarticulation amputation has the advantage of naturally providing a good weight bearing and suspension surface for a socket system at and around the disarticulation. The tensioning system described provides the ability to allow easy donning and doffing while still providing good suspension. A tensioner may adjust the tensioning elements located just above the joint which would have a smaller circumference than the joint area. The socket system can be easily suspended and when donning or doffing is required the tensioner can adjust the length of the tensioning elements to enlarge the size of the socket.
This suspension system may also apply to condyles. Using flexible or semi-flexible material with different forms around and above the condyles such as the condylar wings, the tensioning system can similarly capitalize on the geometry of the condyles to provide additional suspension to the socket. Tension, which is applied over the flexible or semi-flexible material, is then added or removed to enable the entry or exit of the residual limb into the socket.
Similarly, the tensioning system comprising the tensioners, tensioning elements, and tensioning element guides may adjust the size of proximal area of the socket, the size of the socket brim. The socket may be a rigid socket having a semi-flexible proximal area to enable size adjustment for effortless entry and exit of the residual limb into and out of the socket. Such a socket provides improved suspension and comfort since the rigid brim is replaced with a semi-flexible brim which can be easily optimized by a prosthetist or the amputee. Another advantage of using a tensioning system is that the tension or pressure applied to the residual limb may be easily adjusted for improved comfort so that if the amputee knows that he or she will be inactive for periods of time the tension in the system can be decreased to allow for increased range of motion and comfort.
The tensioning system can facilitate donning and doffing of the prosthetic sleeve/liner and the prosthetic socket. Elderly or infirm patients may require assistance in inserting the residual limb worn with a prosthetic sleeve or liner into the prosthetic socket. Because of volume fluctuations experienced by all amputees, it is more difficult to don a socket when the volume of the residual limb is increased. The tensioning element may be attached to the residual limb where the tensioner is used to shorten the tensioning element and pull the residual limb into the socket. The tensioning element can have the form of a cable or wire, or the tensioner and/or tensioning element can be connected to an inner sleeve. Tensioning element guides may further form a pulley-like system to maximize the power and efficiency of the tensioner.
The embodiments of the socket system described preferably have a space between the distal end of residual limb and the distal end of the socket system. Distal padding or a distal cup can be used at the distal end within the socket systems to provide a cushion and distribution of pressure at the distal end of the residual limb such as a foam, silicone, or inflatable pad.
While the embodiments are described with respect to specific tensioning elements, a variety of tensioning elements may be used with the socket system including cables, wires, straps, laces, clips, clamps, or any other device used to provide and maintain tension as understood by the skilled person. Using the tensioning system described allows for faster, easier and finer adjustment of the socket system and quicker donning and doffing of the socket.
The embodiments of the pivoting vertebrae of the flexible spine described can also have a wide pivoting range and preferably have one to two degrees of freedom. The embodiments of the flexible spine described may also be in the form of piece of flexible material. Material may be added between to the flexible spine to provide additional stability to the flexible spine vertebrae.
The embodiments of the adjustable socket system as described have the feature of a rigid posterior spine and a flexible anterior spine. The adjustable socket system may also be implemented with a strut-like rigid posterior spine and rigid anterior spine to apply pressure to the residual limb using a tensioning element. The rigid anterior spine may be formed of interlocking vertebrae similar to those used on the rigid posterior spine in previous embodiments. At least one of the rigid spines can also be formed as a single continuous strut. The rigid spines may have openings or pins through which or around which the tensioning element is connected to the spines to define the circumference of the socket.
Like the rigid posterior spine described in previous embodiments, the rigid spines may have a predetermined angle regarding the longitudinal axis of the socket or the vertical axis. The rigid spine is manufactured at a certain angle by heating or bending the strut to a desired angle. Angling of the struts may be applied to any number of struts on the adjustable socket. Alternatively, the rigid spine can be manufactured, for example by milling or casting, at the predetermined angle. Heating or bending would not be required if the rigid spine is fabricated at the predetermined.
While the previous embodiments have been described as having a fully flexible anterior spine or a fully rigid anterior spine, various levels of flexibility in the anterior spine are advantageous to enable more customization options based on the needs of the user by varying the number of articulation points in the anterior spine. The anterior spine may have one articulation point.
The previous embodiments have been described with two spines. Over two spines or struts may be used together to provide additional pressure distribution points in the adjustable socket and to better distribute the pressure on the residual limb.
Because spines or struts would apply more pressure to the residual limb, the embodiments of the adjustable socket described can have pressure release regions such that if struts apply significant force to the tissues of the residual limb, regions of pressure release to allow for tissue displacement. The release regions may be in openings in the socket, soft elastically deformable material, or stiff material having regions that are elastically deformable. The release regions can also be a recess on the stiff material to prevent application of pressure to an area of the residual limb. The aim is to create even pressure distribution using the flexible plastic sheet under the spines to distribute a load from spines and the tensioning element. This arrangement prevents the amputee from feeling the spines as points of pressure. Due to tensionsing elements and careful material selection, it is possible to achieve uniform quasi-hydrostatic pressure. As an alternative, uneven pressure distribution can be likewise achieved.
The adjustable socket frame 261 includes an anterior spine 12, a posterior spine 14, and an adjustable base 20 similar to other socket systems described. The anterior spine 12 is flexible and is formed of a plurality of individual interlocking vertebrae 268 which can pivot regarding each other. The posterior spine 14 is rigid and formed of a plurality of individual interlocking vertebrae 270 which form a stable, non-pivoting connection with each other. The individual interlocking, non-pivoting vertebrae 270 may be identical to vertebrae of the rigid spine described previously with shorter lateral flaps or extensions. The individual interlocking, pivoting vertebrae 268 may be identical to vertebrae of the flexible spine described previously without lateral flaps or extensions.
The tubular insert 262 is received within the socket frame 261. The tubular insert 262 has an open proximal end to receive a residual limb, and the distal end may be open or closed. The tubular insert 262 defines the interior surface of the socket system 260 such that the tubular insert 262 is the interface between a residual limb and the socket frame 261.
The tubular insert circumferentially forms the interior surface of the system 10. The ends 262a of the sheet of flexible material are brought towards each other to give the insert 262 a tubular shape that is used in a transtibial arrangement. The meeting point of the ends 262a of the sheet is preferably arranged at the posterior side of the socket frame 261. Forming the tubular insert 262 from a sheet of material advantageously allows the socket system 260 to be bifurcated to create an enlarged opening to receive the residual limb. This bifurcation enables easier donning of the socket system 260.
For transfemoral or other levels of amputation outside of transtibial, the meeting point can be in any position. The meeting point can be chamfered or the overlap region can be formed from different or softer material. The meeting point (overlap) can be further enhanced by changing the edges to be waved, oblique or other arrangements to decrease possible pressure points.
The tubular insert 262 of socket system 260 may be formed of a sheet of flexible material, preferably a polymeric material such as silicone. The tubular insert 262 may be provided with a coating on its outer surface to reduce the coefficient of friction between the tensioning element 22 and the tubular insert 262. The tubular insert 262 can have an outer textile layer and inner silicone layer or be coated with a matting agent on its outer surface. Alternatively, a soft or low density polyethylene may be use which is semi-flexible but preferably does not stretch.
The tensioning system of the socket system 260 includes tensioner 28, the tensioning element 22, and a plurality of tensioning element guides 266. The tensioning element guides 266 are arranged longitudinally in a column on the tubular insert 262. An anterior enclosure 264 may be in the tensioning system. The tensioning element guides 266 are attached to both the tubular insert 262 and an anterior enclosure 264 extending laterally from the anterior vertebrae 268 of the flexible spine 12. The socket system 260 is shown with the preferred one-to-one correspondence between the anterior vertebrae 268 of the flexible spine 12 and the posterior vertebrae 270 of the rigid spine 14. Tensioning element guides 266 are provided for each vertebra 268, 270 pair and are positioned circumferentially between the vertebrae 268, 270 on either side of the spines 12, 14. The vertebrae 268, 270 and the tensioning element guides 266 are preferably laterally aligned.
The tensioning element 22 is alternately threaded around a tensioning element guide 266 and through a posterior guide 126 in the posterior vertebra 270. The posterior vertebra 270 may have an internal tensioning element guide similar to guide 138 in
The anterior enclosure 264 forms the outermost portion of the anterior area of the socket system 260. The anterior enclosure 264 includes a lateral member 274 which may have an elongate shape. The lateral member 274 attaches at a first end to pivoting vertebrae 268 and at a second end connect to the tensioning element guide 266 corresponding to those pivoting vertebrae 268. At the second end, the lateral member 274 is connected between the tensioning element guide 266 and the tubular insert 262. The enclosure 264 has a longitudinal member 276 connecting each lateral member 276 between each tensioning element guide 266 to an adjacent later member 276. The anterior enclosure 264 has a central member 278 having approximately the same dimensions as the anterior spine 12. The lateral members 274 extend laterally from either side of the central member 278. The anterior enclosure is made of a flexible material preferably a polymeric material such as silicone or rubber.
The tubular insert 262 and the anterior enclosure 264 are attached to each individual anterior vertebra 268 using a connector 272 such as a screw, rivet, or weld nut. The central member 278 of the anterior enclosure 264 is positioned between the anterior spine 12 and the tubular insert 262.
The tensioning element guides 266 and posterior guides 138 are preferably rotatable to ease the adjustment of the tensioning element 22 length and distribute pressure evenly throughout the length of the socket system 260. To enable rotation of the tensioning element guides 266, the guides 266 are preferably attached to the enclosure 264 with a central weld nut, screw, rivet, or pin. To decrease the coefficient of friction between the guides 266 and the enclosure 264, a washer is placed between the guide 266 and the enclosure 264. The washer is made of textile such as nylon or of metal.
The tensioner 28 is mounted on the posterior spine 14 and controls the length of the tensioning element 22 to adjust the circumferential size of the tubular insert 262. The combination of the tensioner 28, the tensioning element 22, the guides 266, and the anterior enclosure 264 arranged on the frame 261 change the circumferential size of the tubular insert 262 to adjust the fit of the socket system 260 on the residual limb of the user.
Although the anterior enclosure 264 is described as being a separate component of the socket system 260, the anterior enclosure 264 may be integrated into the tubular insert 262 by molding the tubular insert 262 to be thicker in areas of the tubular insert 262 which would correspond to the relative positions of the lateral members 274, longitudinal members 276, and central member 278 regarding the tubular insert 262. The tubular insert 262 is reinforced in areas corresponding to the components of the anterior enclosure 264.
Turning to the socket system 280 in
The tensioning element guides 266 are attached to either side of the tubular insert 266 between the anterior spine 12 and the posterior spine 14. The area on the tubular insert 262 in which the tensioning element guides 266 or the anterior vertebrae 270 are attached may be a reinforced area 292 to strengthen the attachment point on the tubular insert 262. The area 292 may be reinforced with a reinforcement layer or the area 292 may be provided with a greater thickness. To attach the tensioning element guides 266 and the anterior vertebrae 270 to the tubular insert 262, the tubular insert 262 is provided with openings 290 at the connection point.
The tensioning element 22 is threaded through posterior guide 126 in each posterior vertebra 270 and around a circular guide 138. The tensioning element 22 exits another posterior guide 126 and is looped around a tensioning element guide 266. The tensioning element 22 is connected to the tensioner 28, and the tensioner 28 controls the length of the tensioning element 22 to adjust the circumferential size of the tubular insert 262.
The socket frame 261 may be formed of a solid rigid material such as plastic or metal. To add some breathability to the socket system 280, the vertebrae 270 can have perforations 292 which allow air to circulate between the socket frame 261 and the residual limb and/or tubular insert 262.
The tubular insert 262 also has distal padding 282 to provide a cushion between the distal end of the residual limb and the base 20 of the socket frame 261.
Alternatively, the tubular insert 262 may be a tubular prosthetic liner adapted to be used with socket frame 261 by attaching tensioning element guides 266 to the prosthetic liner and removing a portion of the posterior side of the prosthetic liner. An example of a prosthetic liner which can be adapted to be used with socket frame 261 is the prosthetic liner described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,123,818 issued on Feb. 28, 2012 belonging to the assignee of this disclosure and incorporated by reference.
A tubular insert 262 having a stiffened or strengthened anterior area 292 can also be used with a socket frame 261 lacking an anterior spine 12.
To facilitate the adjustment of the circumference of the socket 296, the socket 296 is formed from a rigid and elastically deformable material, and the socket 296 is strategically weakened to enable easier adjustment of the volume of the socket 296. To strategically weaken the socket 296, the socket 296 can be provided with longitudinal cutouts or openings 298 in the surface of the socket 296 in the posterior region of the socket near the longitudinal adjustment area 310 of the sleeve 300.
The tensioning element 22 can enter and exit several different partial areas on the curved guide 302 to change the number of crossings and location of crossings between the two ends of the sleeve 300. This flexibility provides the user with the ability to adjust the area in which more tension and less tension applies to the socket 300. As seen in
The socket 296 may be a hard socket adapted to be used with sleeve 300 through the strategic weakening of the socket 296 as described.
Although the embodiments of the socket system are described with respect to a transtibial level amputation, the socket system may be used with a transfemoral level amputation as well. In an embodiment of a transfemoral socket system, the lateral surface of the transfemoral socket system forms the weight bearing structural element while the medial surface comprises apertures which may be used in combination with tensioning elements to form a flexible surface.
From the features of the adjustable socket system described above, an adjustable socket system is provided that provides simple and quick adjustment to the volume and shape of the socket system, and hence to a residual limb supported by the socket system. The socket system departs from the conventional static socket type and instead allows for adjustment in height, volume and shape permitting adjustment to assure stable fitting of the socket. Further, the socket system accommodates a variety of differently sized residual limbs, and is not constrained to a particular amputee but can be used by a variety of amputees. The socket system is highly breathable enabling better air circulation in the cavity of the socket.
Referring to the embodiment of
The frame 320 defines at least three sets of elongate segments 322, 324, 326 extending from a base 330 of the frame. The base 330 connects to each set of elongate segments 322, 324, 326, and receives a distal end piece 332. A pyramid adapter 334 or similar adapter extends from the base 330 to couple to the pylon 352. A pin lock 336, such as ICELOCK 400 series sold by Ossur hf of Reykjavik, Iceland, may be received by the distal end piece.
The base segment 329 connecting adjacent to the base 330 secures to a generally bent element 331 directing the elongate segments 322, 324, 326 longitudinally from the base 330. The base segment 329 may be rigidly connected to the base element, or alternatively pivotally connected. The segments 327 connecting above the base segment 329 are pivotally connected to one another at pivot locations 328, thereby allowing the frame 320 to adapt the shape of an individual residual limb.
The segments 327 may define a plurality of interior channels 324 (or alternatively exterior channels) for receiving a cable or plurality of different cables connected to a dial tensioning mechanism, as discussed above. Apertures 338 are provided for permitting the cable to extend through so the cable can be laced among the various elongate segments.
The segments and the frame may be constructed from reinforced carbon fibers to enable flexure, and may be adapted in various thickness and lengths according to the demands of a particular amputee. Alternatively, for improved stiffness, the segments may be constructed from metal, such as aluminum.
Regarding the distal end piece 332, by using knowledge of stump and liner profiles, the distal end piece may be able to accommodate most amputees. For example, the distal end piece 332 defines an interior contour 342 for receiving the distal end of a residuum. The distal end piece 332 may be configured to receive a suspension mechanism, such as a pin lock. The distal end piece 332 includes a recess 344 for receiving a pin extending from a liner, and a cavity 348 and channels 346 for receiving part of an adapter.
Referring to the embodiment of
In an alternative to the embodiment of
2. Embodiments of the Adjustable Pylon and Adjustable Prosthetic Foot
Under an embodiment of an adjustable prosthetic limb system,
The proximal connecting portion may be in a circular recess having a continuous side wall to receive the distal connecting portion 424 having the shape of a circular disc. The stacking components are interlocked with each other using a locking mechanism such as a spring-loaded pin inserted through the openings 426 of the stacking component 411 and the openings 428 of the stacking component 412. Other types of locking mechanisms which allow for the removal and reattachment of the stacking components to each other may be used, such as snapping parts or set screws.
The alignment between the socket 402 and the prosthetic foot 406 can be simultaneously adjusted when adjusting the length 408 of the pylon 404 by using stacking components which have the proximal connecting portion 422 offset from the distal connecting portion 424. The center of the proximal connecting portion 422 can be shifted in the horizontal plane a certain distance from the center of the distal connecting portion 424. Each stacking part may have a different offset such as a 3 mm, 5 mm, or 10 mm offset.
Because a variety of stacking components with different combinations of horizontal and/or tilt angle offsets can form the adjustable pylon 404, the prosthetist and user are presented with many options to customize the adjustable prosthetic limb system to the needs and preferences of the user. The adjustable pylon 404 may be provided to the prosthetist or user in a kit with a variety of stacking components, the adjustable socket, and the adjustable foot 406.
It is further preferred the adjustable socket be used with an adjustable prosthetic foot since the length of the foot also affects the gait of the user. The adjustable foot may be used with or without a pylon or an adjustable pylon. The adjustable prosthetic foot 406 of the prosthetic limb system has an adjustable length in two parts which are movable or slide relative to each other. The adjustable foot 406 has an anterior or forefoot part 414 and a posterior or hindfoot part 418. The anterior part 414 has a toe portion 434 and protruding midfoot portion 416 inserted into a recess 420 of the posterior part 418.
As shown in one embodiment of the adjustable foot 406 in
The clamping mechanism may be used in combination with corresponding recesses distributed along the length of the protruding midfoot portion to more stably maintain the length of the adjustable foot. The anterior part 414 and the posterior part 418 can also be adapted to allow for adjustability of the angle of the forefoot part 414 regarding the ground or the angle of the forefoot part 414 regarding the posterior part 418.
Alternatively, the adjustable property of the foot 406 may be achieved using stacking components similar to those used in the pylon 404 alone or in combination with a sliding adjustment as described regarding
Using stacking components in the foot 406 provides an additional adjustable feature. A stacking member would enable an amputee with a high heeled shoe to obtain the correct angle from the heel to the toe. The overall angle of the foot 406 can be adjusted using the stacking components 411. Using stacking components in the foot 406 provides the user an additional point that can adjust the overall angle of the foot 406 by changing the overall shape of the foot 406 to better approximate the shape needed by the user.
The material used in these areas 430, 432 can also have a low durometer to provide some shock absorption in the heel or toe area. The materials used in the areas 430, 432 may be a plastic or an elastomeric material such as rubber. The areas 430, 432 can have regions within the area 430, 432 softer than others to allow the user to more easily fit the adjustable foot 406 into a shoe. The areas 430, 432 may also be removable or replaceable to provide the user with more customization and to enable the replacement of worn areas on the adjustable foot 406. The areas 430, 432 can also be molded with the foot 406.
The embodiments of the adjustable prosthetic limb system described may be used with a liner as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,123,818 and 7,118,602 or a rigid dressing as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,094,212 all of which are incorporated by reference and belong to the assignee of this disclosure.
The embodiments of the adjustable prosthetic limb system described may be used with a prosthetic foot as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,544 incorporated by reference and belonging to the assignee of this disclosure.
The embodiments of the prosthetic limb system as described possess the feature of a wide range of adjustability and adaptability through individual elements which each possess a large range of adjustability and adaptability to different user needs. An advantageous result of this adjustability and adaptability of parts customized to the user's needs are not required. Therefore, the adjustable prosthetic limb system provides the user with a prosthetic limb system that adapts to a wide range of user needs and preferences while making it unnecessary to measure and wait for customized parts and provides a complete, instant prosthetic limb solution.
While the foregoing embodiments have been described and shown, alternatives and modifications of these embodiments, such as those suggested by others, may be made to fall within the scope of the invention. The principles described may be extended to other types of prosthetic or orthopedic devices.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
37282 | Engelbrecht | Jan 1863 | A |
51593 | Jewett | Dec 1865 | A |
310184 | Davis | Jan 1885 | A |
366494 | Marks | Jul 1887 | A |
470431 | Marks | Mar 1892 | A |
977974 | Showalter | Dec 1910 | A |
1066605 | Ianger | Jul 1913 | A |
1082256 | Apgar | Dec 1913 | A |
1144681 | Apgar | Jun 1915 | A |
1861311 | Logan | May 1932 | A |
1893853 | Tullis | Jan 1933 | A |
2025835 | Trautman | Dec 1935 | A |
2141099 | Walters | Dec 1938 | A |
2229728 | Eddels | Jan 1941 | A |
2634424 | O'Gorman | Apr 1953 | A |
2669728 | Ritchie | Feb 1954 | A |
2759271 | Von Duyke | Aug 1956 | A |
2908016 | Botko | Oct 1959 | A |
2949674 | Wexler | Aug 1960 | A |
3678587 | Madden | Jul 1972 | A |
4064874 | Valin | Dec 1977 | A |
4128903 | Marsh et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4161042 | Cottingham et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4225982 | Cochrane et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4268922 | Marsh et al. | May 1981 | A |
4283800 | Wilson | Aug 1981 | A |
4300245 | Saunders | Nov 1981 | A |
4459709 | Leal et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4704129 | Massey | Nov 1987 | A |
4715124 | Harrington | Dec 1987 | A |
4756712 | Clover, Jr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4783293 | Wellershaus et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4842608 | Marx et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4872879 | Shamp | Oct 1989 | A |
4921502 | Shamp | May 1990 | A |
4938775 | Morgan | Jul 1990 | A |
4988360 | Shamp | Jan 1991 | A |
5003969 | Azer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014441 | Pratt | May 1991 | A |
5108456 | Coonan, III | Apr 1992 | A |
5133777 | Arbogast et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5163965 | Rasmusson | Nov 1992 | A |
5168635 | Hoffman | Dec 1992 | A |
5201773 | Carideo, Jr. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201775 | Arbogast et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5246464 | Sabolich | Sep 1993 | A |
5312669 | Bedard | May 1994 | A |
5424782 | Aoki | Jun 1995 | A |
5503543 | Laghi | Apr 1996 | A |
5520529 | Heckel | May 1996 | A |
5529575 | Klotz | Jun 1996 | A |
5529576 | Lundt et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545231 | Houser | Aug 1996 | A |
5571209 | Brown, Sr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5651792 | Telikicherla | Jul 1997 | A |
5652053 | Liegeois | Jul 1997 | A |
5653766 | Naser | Aug 1997 | A |
5718925 | Kristinsson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724714 | Love | Mar 1998 | A |
5728165 | Brown, Sr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5800565 | Biedermann | Sep 1998 | A |
5824111 | Schall et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5885509 | Kristinsson | Mar 1999 | A |
5888215 | Roos et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888217 | Slemker | Mar 1999 | A |
5897517 | Laghi | Apr 1999 | A |
6033440 | Schall et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051026 | Biedermann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077300 | Sabolich et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6206932 | Johnson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6228124 | Slemker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6231618 | Schall et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238437 | Johnson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6334876 | Perkins | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6368357 | Schon et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406499 | Kania | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6444282 | Shirer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458163 | Slemker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497028 | Rothschild et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500210 | Sabolich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6557177 | Hochmuth | May 2003 | B2 |
6669736 | Slemker et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700563 | Koizumi | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6761743 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6793682 | Mantelmacher | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6942703 | Carstens | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974484 | Caspers | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991657 | Price, Jr. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7090700 | Curtis | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094212 | Karason et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097799 | Burton | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7105122 | Karason | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118602 | Bjarnason | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7172714 | Jacobson | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7240414 | Taylor, Sr. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7288116 | Ikeda | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7300466 | Martin | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7318504 | Vitale et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338532 | Haberman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344567 | Slemker | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7402265 | Jacobson | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7479163 | Slemker et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488349 | Einarsson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7591857 | Slemker et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7658720 | Johnson, III | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7727284 | Warila | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753866 | Jackovitch | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762973 | Einarsson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7867286 | Einarsson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7980921 | Saravanos | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985192 | Sheehan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007544 | Jonsson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8083807 | Auberger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088320 | Bedard | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8116900 | Slemker et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8123818 | Bjarnason et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142517 | Horie | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8303527 | Joseph | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8308815 | Mccarthy | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323353 | Alley et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8382852 | Laghi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403993 | Aram et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414658 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8470050 | Dillingham | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480758 | Mcleod | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491667 | Dillingham | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8535389 | Mckinney | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8576250 | Sabiston et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8656918 | Alley et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8795385 | Bache | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845755 | Dillingham | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8978224 | Hurley et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9044349 | Hurley et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9050202 | Bache et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9248033 | Bache | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9283093 | Alley | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9468542 | Hurley et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9468543 | Hurley et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474633 | Williams et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9504585 | Cornell | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9549828 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
D778452 | Cespedes et al. | Feb 2017 | S |
9572691 | Pacanowsky et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
10172728 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10179056 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10206795 | Pedtke et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
20020099450 | Dean, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030181990 | Phillips | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040158332 | Carstens | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040260402 | Baldini et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050209706 | Warila | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216096 | Wagman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050267600 | Haberman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278039 | Nobbe | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288798 | Curtis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009860 | Price, Jr. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020348 | Slemker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060135902 | Ingimundarson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070004993 | Coppens et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078523 | Kholwadwala et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070152379 | Jacobson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070298075 | Borgia et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080066272 | Hammerslag | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080269914 | Coppens et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090036999 | Egilsson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076625 | Groves et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105844 | Ortiz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090240344 | Colvin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287128 | Ingimundarson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299490 | Summit | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030344 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036300 | Sheehan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036505 | Hassler | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100082116 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121464 | Mantelmacher | May 2010 | A1 |
20100160722 | Kuyava et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191348 | Kettwig et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100274364 | Pacanowsky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110029096 | Laghi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110035027 | Mccarthy | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071647 | Mahon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114635 | Sheehan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110232837 | Ottleben | Sep 2011 | A9 |
20110320010 | Vo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120022667 | Accinni et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120041567 | Cornell | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120095570 | Marquette | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101417 | Joseph | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101597 | Bache | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120143077 | Sanders et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165956 | Li | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191218 | Mccarthy | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215324 | King | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253475 | Kelley et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259432 | Dillingham | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259434 | Dillingham | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271210 | Galea et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271433 | Galea et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283846 | Janssen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293411 | Leithinger et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130123940 | Hurley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130192071 | Esposito et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197318 | Herr et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218296 | Koniuk et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245785 | Accini et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130282141 | Herr et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140005798 | Bache | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031953 | Mackenzie | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140121783 | Alley | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135946 | Hurley et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149082 | Sanders et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140227584 | Hurley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277585 | Kelley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140336783 | Bache | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150018974 | Dillingham | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150105867 | Novak | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150168943 | Hurley et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150190252 | Hurley et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150230945 | Bache | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150257905 | Bache | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265434 | Hurley et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150313729 | Williams et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150313730 | Hurley et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150352775 | Geshlider et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000586 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160000587 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160058584 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160143752 | Hurley et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160158035 | Alley | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160235560 | Cespedes et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160278949 | Dillingham | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160331562 | Bache | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334780 | Dair et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338858 | Hurley et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170027718 | Williams et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170128238 | Hurley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170156896 | Alley | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180000615 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180008434 | Geiger et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020973 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180021153 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180153716 | Martin | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180221178 | Steinberg et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221179 | Bache et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180263702 | Hurley et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180293333 | Alley et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180296373 | Granz | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180303637 | Bache | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180333279 | Granz et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2889617 | May 2014 | CA |
104884005 | Sep 2015 | CN |
104053416 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106913407 | Jul 2017 | CN |
109328045 | Feb 2019 | CN |
319623 | Mar 1920 | DE |
19529055 | Jan 1997 | DE |
0204407 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0269391 | Jun 1998 | EP |
1433447 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1656911 | May 2006 | EP |
2629705 | Aug 2013 | EP |
3448323 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3448324 | Mar 2019 | EP |
127451 | Jun 1919 | GB |
675811 | Jul 1952 | GB |
2080114 | Feb 1982 | GB |
2169207 | Jul 1986 | GB |
2088182 | Aug 1997 | RU |
9116019 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9812994 | Apr 1998 | WO |
0003665 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0030572 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2007035875 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2008116025 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009093020 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2012021823 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012054700 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2013071308 | May 2013 | WO |
2014004709 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014068269 | May 2014 | WO |
2014205403 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015095232 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2016183065 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017186901 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017186902 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017194479 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018017959 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alley, “The High-Fidelity Interface: Skeletal Stabilization Through Alternating Soft Tissue Compression and Release”, Proceedings of the 2011 MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium Frederiction, New Brunswick, Canada, Aug. 2011. 3 Pages. |
Andrysek, “Lower-Limb Prosthetic Technologies in the Developing World: A Review of Literature from 1994-2010”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Cardiff, Wales, UK; vol. 34, No. 4, Dec. 2010; pp. 378-398. |
Conn, “Materials Science: A Look At Some of the Substances on the Market for Device Fabrication”, O&P Almanac, Jun. 2012, pp. 28-31; http://wwww.allardusa.com/pdf/articles/Materials%20Science%20Article%20-%20June%202012%20O%26P%20Almanac.pdf. |
Fairley, M. “From Academia to the Developing World: Student Engineers Create Collaborative Technologies”, The O&P Edge Magazine, OandP.com, Mar. 2011, pp. 1-9. Downloaded from http://www.oandp.com/articles/2011-05-03.asp. |
Fairley, M. “M.A.S. Socket: A Transfemoral Revolution”, The O&P Edge, Jun. 2004, www.oandp.com/articles/2004-06_03.asp. 5 Pages. |
“Comfil—Thermo Formable Composite Technique”, Fillaur LLC and Centri, Fabrication Manuel, Jun. 15, 2012, pp. 1-13. |
Gard, S.A. “Overview of Lower Limb Prosthetics Research”, WRAMC and the VA Orthopedic & Prosthetic Workshop Arlington, VA, Nov. 17-18, 2003, pp. 1-49. |
Geil, M.D., “Consistency, Precision, and Accuracy of Optical and Electromagnetic Shape-Capturing Systems for Digital Measurement of Residual-limb Anthropometrics of Persons With Transtibial Amputation”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 44, No. 4, 2007; pp. 515-524. |
Gleave, “A Plastic Socket and Stump Casting Technique for Above-Knee Prostheses”, Orthopaedic and Prosthetic Appliance Department, Hong Kong Government Medical Department, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 47B, No. 1, Feb. 1965, pp. 100-103. +. |
Gerschutz, et al., “Mechanical Evaluation of Direct Manufactured Prosthetic Sockets”, American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists, 38th Academy Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, U.S.A., Mar. 21-24, 2012; downloaded from http://www.oandp.org/publications/jop/2012/2012-19.pdf. 1 page. |
Greenwald, et al., “Volume Management: Smart Variable Geometry Socket (SVGS) Technology for Lower-Limb Prostheses”, American Academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists, vol. 15, No. 3, 2003, pp. 107-112. |
Hong, et al, “Dynamic Moisture Vapor Transfer through Textiles: Part I: Clothing Hygrometry and the Influence of Fiber Type”, Textile Research Journal, Thousand Oaks, California, U.S.A., Dec. 1988; 58: 697-706, Abstract. 1 Page. |
Hwang, “Blooming Winner—Spark!”, Spark Galleries, 2012/Spark/Concept,Spark Design Awards, 2012 3 Pages. Downloaded from http://www.sparkawards.com/galleriew/index.cfm?entry=9525D900-EoEF-59BD-46597D99. |
Jana, “Designing a Cheaper, Simpler Prosthetic Arm”, ZDNet, Nov. 14, 2011, pp. 1-5. Downloaded from http://www.2dnet.com/article/designing-a-cheaper-simpler-prosthetic-arm/. |
Koike, et al., “The TC Double Socket Above-knee Prosthesis”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 5, 1981 pp. 129-134. |
Krouskop, et al., “Computer-aided design of a prosthetic socket for an above-knee amputee”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 24, No. 2 1987, pp. 31-38. |
Manucharian, “An Investigation of Comfort Level Trend Differences Between the Hands-On Patellar Tendon Bearing and Hands-Off Hydrocast Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets”, JPO: American academy of Orthotists & Prosthetists, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.; vol. 23, No. 3, 2011: pp. 124-140. |
Otto Bock Healthcare LLP, “Initial and Interim Prostheses”, Otto Bock Healthcare LLP, Prosthetics Lower Extremities 2008, Feb. 2013 pp. 1-8, www.ottobockus.com/cps/rde/xbcr/ob_us_en/08cat_I.pdf. |
Otto Bock Healthcare LLP , “Ottobock: PU Resin Kit Polytol”; Downloaded Dec. 17, 2012 from http://www.ottobock.com/cps.rde/xchg/ob_com_en/hs.xs1/17414.html. |
Sanders, et al., “Residual limb volume change: Systematic review of measurement and management”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2011, vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 949-986. |
Sathishkumar, et al., “A cost-effective, adjustable, femoral socket, temporary prosthesis for immediate rehabilitation of above-knee amputation”, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Mar. 2004, vol. 27, No. 1; pp. 71-74. |
SBIR topic summary: “Pro-Active Dynamic Accommodating Socket”, http://www.dodsbir.net/sitis/archieves_display_topic.asp?Bookmark=34570; downloaded Mar. 25, 2013, U.S. A. 3 pages. |
Smith, “Silver Linings for O&P Devices”, The Academy Today, vol. 1, No. 4: Oct. 2005, 4 Pages, Downloaded from, http://www.oandp.org/AcademyTODAY/20050ct/7.asp. |
Spaeth, JP , “Laser Imaging and Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacture in Prosthetics and Orthotics”, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Feb. 2006 pp. 245-263, Abstract. 2 pages. |
Turner, “Fit for Everyone”, Yanko Design-Form Beyond Junction, Jul. 17, 2015, pp. 1-10. Downloaded from http://www.yankodesign.com/2013/07/17/fit-for-erveryone/. |
“Hanger ComfortFlex Socket System for Prosthetic Devices:” Downloaded Nov. 28, 2012 from http://www.hanger.com/prosthetics/services/Technology/Pages/ComfortFlex.asp pp. 1-2. |
Wilson Jr. “A Material for Direct Forming of Prosthetic Sockets”, Artificial Limbs., vol. 4, No. 1, 1970, Downloaded from http://www.oandplibrary.org/al/1970_01_053.asp; downloaded Dec. 14, 2012. pp. 53-56. |
Wilson, “Recent Advances in Above-Knee Prosthetics”, Artificial Limbs, vol. 12, No. 2, 1968 pp. 1-27. |
Wu, et al, “CIR sand casting system for trans-tibial socket”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Aug. 2003: vol. 27, pp. 146-152. |
Extended Search Report from European Patent Application No. 12847452.5, dated Jul. 21, 2015. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2012/064876, dated Feb. 19, 2013. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2012/064876, dated Feb. 19, 2013. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029773, dated Jun. 13, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029773,dated Jun. 13, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/043500, dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/043500, dated Aug. 18, 2014. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US15/021611, dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US15/021611, dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2014/070666, dated Mar. 31, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/070666, dated Mar. 31, 2015. |
Quigley, Michael, “Prosthetic Management: Overview, Methods and Materials,” Chapter 4, Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles, Second Edition, 1992, 10 Pages. Downloaded from: http://www.oandplibrary.org/alp/chapot-01.asp. |
Burgess, et al. “Immediate Post-Surgical Prosthetic Fitting”, The Management of Lower-Extremity Amputations, Aug. 1969, pp. 42-51. |
Compton, et al., “New Plastics for Forming Directly on the Patient”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 1978, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 43-47, Abstract. 3 Pages. |
Fairley, “Socket Can Be Fabricated, Modified, Fitted—In One Hour”, The O&P Edge, Jun. 2007. 5 Pages. |
“Cut-4-Custom: Custom TLSO in Less Than an Hour”, The O&P Edge, Oct. 2010. 2 Pages. |
“Remoldable Prosthetics”, InstaMorph Moldable Plastic, http://instamorph.com/wp-content/uploads/legcast1.png, Retrieved, May 10, 2016. 3 Pages. |
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/2016/031615, dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220125606 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61665379 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16716058 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17571174 | US | |
Parent | 14704572 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 16716058 | US | |
Parent | 13930053 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14704572 | US |