1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to screens for windows, doors and the like, and in particular, to a screen retention assembly for securing a screen to a frame or surround. The invention presented is primarily intended for security screens that deter human intruders and provide impact protection from flying debris. However, the system may also be used for security screens that prevent the intrusion of insects and small animals into a building.
2. Background of the Invention
Doors or windows incorporating a semi-transparent screen or mesh provide the advantages of visibility, ventilation, and also the ability to prevent the passage of insects or small animals through the aperture covered by the screen. Screens are typically made from a flexible wire mesh although other flexible or semi-rigid perforate sheet materials may be used.
Common prior art screen systems attach the mesh directly to the perimeter of the window or door opening with simple fasteners such as screws, rivets or glue. While such systems are functional, they lack a means of applying tension to the screen upon installation. A tensioned screen is important because ordinary use of a door or window often causes repeated impact loads to the screen, for example pushing the door open by pushing or kicking the screen. Thus, the semi-rigid material of the screen often appears floppy after a short period of ordinary use.
The strength and appearance of a screen attached using simple fasteners is also overly dependent on the skill of the fabricator. For example, if the screen is cut slightly too small, the screen will be weakened and subject to pulling out of the frame because the fasteners will be too close to the edge of the mesh. If glue is used, it will not sufficiently cover enough surface area of the mesh to create a strong bond. On the other hand, if the screen is cut slightly to large, then the mesh will be unavoidably floppy because the use of simple fasteners provide no means for tensioning the mesh.
To overcome many of the weaknesses of directly fastening a screen to the perimeter of a window or door opening, more modern systems that frame the openings with extruded metal, typically aluminum, channel sections have been developed, wherein the edges of the screen are secured within the channel walls. A wide variety of means for securing screens within the channel walls have been developed. Prior art systems range from simple friction fits between the screens and the channels to complex turnbuckle like fasteners mounted in the channels which grip and tension the screen.
Screen retention systems that feature channel section frames about the perimeter of door or window opening have effectively overcome many of the drawbacks of systems that attached the screen directly to the door or window frame. Aesthetic appearance has been improved due to the lack of visible fasteners. Function has also been improved because some of the prior channel section screen retention systems have some ability to tension the screen.
Prior an channel-based screen retention systems do suffer from certain drawbacks however. In particular, prior art systems typically use flat or screen edges which allow for only a very limited amount of screen tensioning and offer only modest resistance to screen impact loading. When screen tensioning provisions are specifically provided, they nevertheless often have a very limited adjustment range. In addition, many prior art screen retention systems allow the metal of the screen, typically iron or steel, to contact the wall of the, typically aluminum, channel. This contact of dissimilar metals allows for galvanic corrosion at the interface between the screen and the channel. Power coated stainless steel is the preferred material for security screens. Common insect screens are typically made using vinyl coated fiber glass, aluminum mesh, galvanized steel, bronze, stainless steel, or vinyl coated polyester.
What is needed in the art is an improved channel-based screen retention system that provides a more secure attachment of the screen within the channel to provide increased resistance to screen impact loading. Also desirable is a broader range of screen of tensioning adjustment and for a design that electrically isolates the screen from the walls of the channel, when the channel and screen are both made from metallic materials as is commonly the case.
It is the purpose of the present invention to provide an improved channel-based screen retention system that increases the resistance to screen impact loading; provides for a broad range of screen tensioning adjustability, and that electrically isolates the screen from the walls of the channel to prevent galvanic corrosion, among other features.
The invention comprises a screen retention system comprised of a screen retained within a frame, the frame being composed of frame members having channel cross sections. In the exemplary embodiment, the frame members are extrusions, the outer perimeter of which frame a window, door, or like structure, or are designed to be received within the opening of a door, window, or like structure, where it is desired to close out the opening with a screen. The mesh or perforate screen features an inner face and an outer face. The perimeter of the screen is formed with a rolled or u-shaped edge hem. The edge hem having a flange which folds inwardly over the inner face of the screen and is parallel to, and spaced above, the inner face of the screen.
The inner perimeter of the members which form the frame for the screen include an opening or main channel for receipt of the screen. In cross section, an upper interior wall of the main channel of each frame member has a serrated surface while an opposing lower, interior wall features a pair of spaced apart inner and outer interior longitudinal channels. The interior longitudinal channels serve to secure an elastomeric gasket. A substantial depth of clear space exists inwardly of the serrations and a bottom of the main channel. The depth of free space allows for a broad range of adjustability for tensioning the screen.
The elastomeric gasket features a pair of spaced apart, longitudinally running per and lower ribs featuring a bulb style cross section for engagement with the mating spaced apart inner and outer interior longitudinal channels formed in the lower interior wall of the main channel of the frame members. On an opposite side, the elastomeric gasket has serrations for engaging the mesh or perforations of the screen. The screen is inserted into the channel sections such that the u-shaped hem of the screen faces away from the serrations in the elastomeric gasket.
The screen is locked into place within the channel of the frame members by means of a plurality of locking tabs. In the exemplary embodiment, the locking tabs are of generally rectangular cross-section and are composed of a deformable material. One face of the tabs includes serrations. During assembly, the locking tabs are inserted into the channel of the frame members between the inner face of screen and the upper interior wall of the channel. The screen is locked into place and tensioned by pressing the locking tabs downwardly into the channel such that the serrated face of the tabs engages the serrations on the upper interior wall of the channel while a perpendicular face of the tabs engages an upper edge of the flange of the u-shaped hem on the screen. The degree of screen tension is controlled by the insertion depth of the tabs. During tab insertion the fixed elastomeric gasket beneath the screen mesh is compressed and provides a constant force to hold the tabs in position.
After the screen has been secured within the channel of the frame members as described above, an elastomeric gasket is partially inserted into the opening between the inward face of the screen and the upper interior wall of the channel for the purpose of sealing out the elements.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. The invention may, however, may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
With reference to
With reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring to
The screen 16 is locked into place within the channel section 18 of each frame member 14 by means of the at least one locking tabs 22. Referring now to
Referring now to
In the exemplary embodiment, the serrations 40 of the upper interior wall 36 of the channel 18 are made from a material comparatively harder than that of the at least one locking tabs 22 to ensure that the serrations 40 of the channel 18 engage and plastically deform the mating serrations 62 the locking tabs 22. The material of the retention gasket 20 is comparatively softer than that of the screen 16, such that the serrations 60 of the gasket 20 engage with the mesh or perforations 15 in the screen 16.
After the screen 16 has been secured within the channels 18 of the frame members 14 as described above, an elastomeric sealing gasket 24 is partially inserted into the opening between the inward face of the screen 16 and the upper interior wall 36 of the channel 14 for the purpose of sealing out the elements.
The above described screen retention system 10 presents several advantages over the prior art. In particular, the free edge 34 of the screen 16 does not require the addition of an electrical insulator because the at least one locking tabs 22 are themselves made (in the exemplary embodiment) from an insulating material, but more importantly the free edge 34 of the screen 16 does not face toward the dissimilar metal (in the exemplary embodiment aluminum) of the upper and lower interior walls 36 and 38 of the channel 18 of the frame members 14, but instead faces toward one of the planer edge faces 64 of the at least one locking tabs 22, thereby preventing dielectric corrosion.
In addition more force can be applied to edge hem 30 of the screen 16 of the present invention without distortion of free edge 34 during tensioning of the screen 16, as compared to, for example, a perpendicular lip as may be found in some prior art designs. This is important because a more highly tensioned screen 16 improves the aesthetics of the finished product, and for security screen applications can withstand greater impact due m it's improved pullout strength. The screen 16 of the present invention 10 may also be more centrally located within the frame 12 preventing an imbalance of the sealing gasket 24 and retention 20 gasket thicknesses, which further contributes to improved appearance. The screen's 16 tension is maintained by compressive force from the retention gasket 20, holding serrated surface 62 of the at least one locking tab 22 into the matching serrations 40 of the upper interior wall 36 of the frame members 14. The screen retention gasket 20 has a high degree of compressibility which allows for the use of screens of different thickness (wire thicknesses in the case of wire mesh screens) without the need to use gaskets of differing thicknesses.
Also, the edge hem 30 of the screen 16 of the present invention has manufacturing advantages over the L-shaped edge hem used in some prior an designs in that formed screens can be stacked after the formation of edge hem 30 without risk of damage to the protective finish of adjacent screens 16, as the free edges 34 of the screen are parallel to the plane of the screen. Screens featuring the U-shaped edge hem 3 of the present invention can be more easily guided into frame members having a narrow opening without risk of damage to the semen doe to the rounded edge profile as compared to the abrupt square or sharp edge of an L-shaped edge hem design. Further manufacturing efficiency is realized due to the fast installation of the tabs as compared to tensioning with a multitude of fasteners.
The foregoing detailed description and appended drawings are intended as a description of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention and are not intended to represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed and/or utilized. Those skilled in the art will understand that modifications and alternative embodiments of the present invention which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the foregoing specification and drawings, and of the claims appended below are possible and practical. It is intended that the claims cover all such modifications and alternative embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2335361 | Schiller | Nov 1943 | A |
2627311 | Kaufmann | Feb 1953 | A |
2709489 | Keebler | May 1955 | A |
3220469 | Oehmig | Nov 1965 | A |
3341013 | Moulton | Sep 1967 | A |
3421276 | La Barge | Jan 1969 | A |
3541957 | Bubley | Nov 1970 | A |
3805873 | Bloomfield | Apr 1974 | A |
4153981 | Stuppy | May 1979 | A |
4232310 | Wilson | Nov 1980 | A |
4409749 | Hamu | Oct 1983 | A |
4788806 | Sease | Dec 1988 | A |
4838332 | Mlenek | Jun 1989 | A |
4879777 | Goodwin | Nov 1989 | A |
4899797 | Green | Feb 1990 | A |
4937961 | Gandy et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4955928 | Tanner | Sep 1990 | A |
5209029 | Foerst | May 1993 | A |
5245774 | Huber | Sep 1993 | A |
5259323 | Koch et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5398388 | Coleman | Mar 1995 | A |
5467546 | Kovalak, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5502906 | Yamawaki | Apr 1996 | A |
5572821 | Coleman | Nov 1996 | A |
5647155 | Hillstrom | Jul 1997 | A |
5702147 | Essig | Dec 1997 | A |
6088942 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6125910 | Pepperell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6412538 | Welfonder | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6637080 | Verret | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6802357 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6892787 | Stretch | May 2005 | B1 |
7165296 | Coleman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7537043 | Veivers et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7934350 | Koutsoukos | May 2011 | B2 |
8016013 | Horvath | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8191606 | Edlin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8297197 | Tabellini et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8347939 | Brabeck et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8985183 | Terry | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20090159222 | Moriya et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100147471 | Bull | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120073771 | Dickison et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140130993 | Zwar | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008202835 | Jun 2008 | AU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150267459 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |