Adjustable shotgun choke

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6557290
  • Patent Number
    6,557,290
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 28, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 6, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Carone; Michael J.
    • Semunegus; Lulit
    Agents
    • Hanson; Sven W.
Abstract
The present invention is a light weight low profile variable shotgun bore choke that is easily manually adjusted by the user. To minimize the choke profile, the choke is connected to the shotgun through a threaded connection within the muzzle bore. External threads on a choke inner sleeve are configured to mate with standard threads found in existing prior shotgun barrel muzzles or with custom threads specifically formed. By using a threaded connection internal to the gun barrel, the overall radial dimensions of the choke are minimized thereby reducing the profile visible to the user. Weight is also reduced by a design which reduces radial dimensions and by use of light weight materials. The choke is adjusted by the user by manually rotating an outer adjustment sleeve with respect to an inner bore sleeve which is fixed to the shotgun barrel. The adjustment sleeve rotates through a range of choke conditions between two physical stops. Various choke conditions are indicated by circumferential grooves that are easily viewed from any location around the choke.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention pertains to devices for altering the shot pattern obtainable from shotguns. In particular, the invention pertains to adjustable chokes for providing variable shot pattern with a single shotgun. This function has been addressed by a great variety of prior devices. Typically, one or more vents, barrel wall constrictions or enlargements and other structures are provided at the shotgun muzzle to compress or expand shot passing through the barrel. While such prior devices are somewhat successful in controlling shot pattern, they typically result in a firearm which is difficult to use or which detracts from the performance of the shotgun.




In both competition shooting and hunting, the additional weight of a shot pattern altering “choke” structure at the end of the gun barrel can render a shotgun more difficult to move and aim. In addition, in order to accomplish the desired functions, prior variable choke devices typically have radial dimensions significantly greater than the associated shotgun barrel. Because these larger structures are at the end of the gun barrel, the result is an obstruction to the user's sight when aiming at a target. In addition, prior variable chokes require too much attention by the user to be successfully used in a hunting environment, where the user may have to quickly make adjustments to shot pattern depending upon rapidly changing events. These adjustments may also have to be accomplished in low light. Prior devices which require careful visual scrutiny of adjustment markings are likely to be improperly used in such conditions. The prior device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,629,958 to W. F. Roper et al. provides examples of these failings. The Roper device is relatively large: projecting outward from the outer diameter of the gun barrel to which it is mounted. The Roper device also provides adjustment indicia in the form of surface lettering which is likely to be difficult to use in low light conditions. Another example of this type of design is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 2,634,537 to R. V. Velez et al. What is needed is a low profile, low weight adjustable shotgun choke which does not interfere with the effective use of the connected shotgun and may be quickly adjusted without the need for careful scrutiny.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is a light weight low profile bore choke that is easily manually adjusted by the user. To minimize the choke profile, the choke is connected to the shotgun through a threaded connection within the muzzle. External threads on a choke inner sleeve are configured to mate with standard threads found in existing prior shotgun barrel muzzles or with custom threads specifically formed. By using a threaded connection internal to the gun barrel, the overall radial dimensions of the choke are minimized thereby reducing the profile visible to the user.




The choke is adjusted by the user by manually rotating an outer adjustment sleeve with respect to an inner bore sleeve which is fixed to the shotgun barrel. The adjustment sleeve has longitudinal grooves to increase grip. The adjustment sleeve has internal threads which mate with external threads on the bore sleeve. When the adjustment sleeve is rotated, a tapered adjustment surface within the adjustment sleeve forces elongated fingers on the bore sleeve radially inward to form a bore constriction. This constriction converges in the direction of the mouth of the choke to cause the choking effect. Various taper designs including those known in the prior art are applicable to the present invention. The adjustment sleeve rotates between two physical stops to provide the full range of adjustment. Indicia are also provided to provide visual indication of the choke condition. These are preferably circumferential grooves that are easily visible from any position surrounding the choke. One physical stop is formed by a spring clip that is located between the bore sleeve and the adjustment sleeve. It is secured rotationally to the bore sleeve and biased against the inside of the adjustment sleeve. As the adjustment sleeve is rotated, a clip end drags against the adjustment sleeve until aligning with an aperture in the adjustment sleeve. The adjustment sleeve is prevented from being moved past an open condition by the interference of the clip end in the aperture. This operation of the spring clip increases safety of the choke in that the adjustment sleeve cannot be accidentally loosened or removed from the bore sleeve. To reduce weight, the adjustment sleeve is preferably formed of titanium. Additional advantages of the invention will become obvious from the following details and figures.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

depicts an exploded view of a choke according to the present invention secured to a shotgun muzzle.





FIGS. 2 and 3

are longitudinal cross section views of open and fully “choked” conditions of one embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 4



a


and


4




b


are cross section views of a choke in the conditions of

FIGS. 2 and 3

, respectively, and showing the operation of a spring clip.











DETAILS OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIGS. 1

,


2


, and


3


depict a preferred embodiment of the present invention. A choke


99


consists of two primary parts: an inner bore sleeve


4


and an outer adjustment sleeve


6


.




The bore sleeve


4


is generally in the form of an elongated cylinder and is positioned within a generally cylindrical cavity of the adjustment sleeve


6


. Adjacent one end of the bore sleeve


4


external threads


8


are configured to mate with internal threads


10


located within the end of the barrel of a shotgun


12


. Many shotguns currently available from consumer gun makers are provided with internal threads, such as shown in the figure, that are intended for use in attaching prior chokes. The bore sleeve external threads


8


may be configured to mate with these existing shotguns or a shotgun may have custom threads cut for the purpose. From the gun barrel internal threads to the gun muzzle, the gun bore has an increased internal diameter to accommodate the choke. Extending from the bore sleeve external threads, the bore sleeve has a length of smooth cylindrical sleeve with an external diameter fitting in close tolerance with the increased diameter portion of the shotgun bore. The internal diameter of the portion of the sleeve bore within the gun barrel is the same as the gun bore. The connection of the present choke to internal threads of the shotgun barrel is a critical feature of the invention. Only by using a connection within the barrel is a low profile choke possible. The prior art devices, that teach connection on the outside of a shotgun barrel, protrude unacceptably into the line of sight of the user when the gun is aimed. By using a connection at radial dimension less than the outer diameter of the gun barrel (an internal connection), the present invention provides a choke which has a minimum profile as viewed by the user. Appropriate materials and methods for constructing the bore sleeve are those known in the art for making similar devices.




At the opposite end of the bore sleeve


4


, longitudinal slots are cut in the bore sleeve


4


to form elongated fingers


14


. The fingers


14


are preferably of equal circumferential dimension although variation among the fingers is possible. There must be sufficient number of fingers


14


that each is narrow enough to allow their free ends to flex inwardly in a radial direction without permanently deforming. Most preferably eight fingers are used. For the same reason, the radial thickness of the fingers must also be small enough, and the fingers of sufficient length, to allow flexure with minimal force and without permanent deformation. The amount of flexure required in use is determined by the amount of “choke” or constriction of the bore that is required. The particular length of the fingers and their angle in choke conditions follows the existing knowledge of the art in this matter. Below, Table 1 provides characteristic parameters for a preferred device designed for use with a 12 gauge shotgun.












TABLE 1











Preferred Device Dimensions for a 12 Gauge Shotgun














Characteristic




Inch (cm)











Bore inner diameter




 0.740 (1.880)







Finger length




 1.0 (2.54)







Finger tip radial deflection




 0.02-0.03 (0.05-0.10)







(full choke)







Radial thickness at finger base




 0.066 (0.168)







Adjustment threads




16 (TPI)







Thread form




double helix















In the device described in Table 1, an adjustment thread having sixteen (16) threads per inch in double helix form provide a lead of 0.125 inch for a single revolution of the adjustment sleeve


6


on the bore sleeve


4


. The adjustment sleeve taper


28


is formed such that two complete revolutions of the adjustment sleeve produces radial deflection of about 0.022 inch at the end of each finger—a full choke diameter reduction of 0.045 inch. The specific dimensions required will vary with the bore of the particular shotgun and the amount of choke required in each case. Generally, smaller gauge shotguns will have smaller finger deflections. However, the minimum finger thickness in all cases is also limited by strength requirements as the fingers are subjected to significant shock and vibration when the associated shotgun is fired, and must be prevented from breaking. To reduce stresses at the base of the fingers, it is suggested that each slot separating the fingers be terminated at the root by a round through-hole to distribute local stresses. The outside surface of the end of the fingers is tapered in decreasing radial dimension toward the tips as shown. These finger tapered surfaces


15


contact a mating surface on the adjustment sleeve


6


as discussed below.




Between the fingers


14


and the external threads


8


of the bore sleeve are a second set of adjustment threads


16


. These adjustment threads


16


are used to connect, and adjust the axial location of, the adjustment sleeve


6


with respect to the bore sleeve


4


. The adjustment sleeve


6


includes internal threads


18


that mate with the bore sleeve adjustment threads


16


. The connectivity of these threads and the relative position of the two sleeves is shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

which are longitudinal cross section views of the device shown in FIG.


1


. Details of this connectivity are discussed in a paragraph below. The adjustment threads and mating adjustment sleeve internal threads


18


are preferably of double helix form to provide the desired adjustment with a minimum of thread depth. This is essential to minimizing the overall radial dimension of the choke. The fit of the threads must also be such as to allow manual adjustment of the two parts.




Between the bore sleeve adjustment threads


16


and the external threads


8


are a series of circumferential lands


20


and grooves


22


. These function to indicate the relative position of the adjustment sleeve


6


and implicitly the condition of the choke. The grooves are spaced and positioned to match the position of the trailing edge


24


of the adjustment sleeve


6


when the adjustment sleeve


6


is correctly located at desired choke adjustment positions. This gives indication of the choke condition that is quickly and easily recognizable by the user. Because the grooves


22


and trailing edge


24


extend completely circumferentially around the choke, the condition of the choke is discernable regardless of the relative position of the viewer. This allows quick and certain adjustment of the choke. Although the adjustment features of the present choke are operable with other means of indicating choke condition (such as those provided in the above referenced U.S. patents), the above is greatly preferred for the reasons given. Details of the positioning and spacing of the grooves are given in a following paragraph.




The adjustment sleeve


6


is generally a thin-walled cylinder having a central bore to accept the bore sleeve


4


. The adjustment sleeve external surface is generally shaped to provide a secure grip to the user. Longitudinal partial-depth grooves


26


are provided for this purpose. The wall thickness of the adjustment sleeve


6


is generally as small as possible to both reduce weight and the radial profile of the choke. Because the adjustment sleeve


6


is the outermost element of the choke, it is the portion visible to the user when sighting the shotgun. With any choke, it is desired to minimize the distance the choke extends into the line of sight above the outer surface of the gun barrel. Minimizing wall thickness is also important to reducing weight. To help reduce both weight and choke profile, the adjustment sleeve is preferably made from a very high strength and low weight material. Most preferably, the material is titanium or a high titanium alloy. The inner surface of one end of the adjustment sleeve


6


has a taper


28


which ends in a minimum internal diameter at the mouth


29


of the adjustment sleeve


6


. This taper


28


is the driver of choke adjustment. When the adjustment sleeve


6


is threaded to the bore sleeve


4


, the adjustment sleeve taper


28


contacts the finger tapered surfaces


15


. The two tapered surfaces,


15


and


28


, are at least initially parallel to maximize the support surface on the outside of the fingers


14


. When the adjustment sleeve


6


is forced axially over the fingers


14


, the fingers are forced radially inward by the tapered interface, thereby reducing the bore internal diameter to create a converging bore and the desired choke effect. This operation is generally known to those skilled in the art. An initial taper angle of 3.5 degrees is preferred for use in conjunction with the parameters specified herein for a 12 gauge exemplary device. Preferably, the adjustment sleeve taper increases in angle toward the choke mouth


29


—from left to right in the figure. This increased angle is necessary to maintain contact and pressure on the full length of the fingers as the fingers are flexed radially inward. In the embodiment shown, the taper is formed of three discrete sections of progressively increasing taper angle. Alternative configurations of increasing taper angle are contemplated including a taper surface with continuously increasingly taper angle. At the opposite end of the adjustment sleeve


6


, the adjustment sleeve


6


has a skirt


30


which extends beyond the internal threads


18


to the trailing edge


24


.




The relative axial location of the elements of both the bore sleeve


4


and the adjustment sleeve


6


are interrelated and linked to the choke performance requirements. The adjustment sleeve internal threads


18


and the bore sleeve external threads


16


must have secure engagement in all operational choke conditions. The lead of the threads and the adjustment sleeve taper


28


are preferably configured so that a 720 degree rotation of the adjustment sleeve


6


with respect to the bore sleeve


4


results in the full range of adjustment desired from the choke. At the same time, physical stops must be provided at the limits of the adjustment range. Either extremes of the choke setting range are easily perceived by the physical stops which prevent further rotation of the adjustment sleeve. Mid-range choke positions are found with little difficulty by viewing the adjustment sleeve


6


position relative to the circumferential grooves


22


on the sleeve bore.




Zero choke and full choke conditions of the preferred embodiment are depicted in

FIGS. 2 and 3

, respectively. At zero choke, each finger tapered surface


15


is in contact with the adjustment sleeve taper


28


without being significantly displaced. Rotation of the adjustment sleeve


6


to separate the adjustment sleeve


6


from the sleeve bore


4


is prevented by a physical stop created by a spring clip end


40


which is trapped in a aperture


32


in the skirt


30


of the adjustment sleeve


6


. Details of the spring clip


42


are provided in a following paragraph. As the adjustment sleeve


6


is rotated, and moved axially relative to the fingers (to the left in the figures), the fingers


14


are displaced radially inward to create a converging section of bore and a partially choked condition. The adjustment sleeve


6


may be rotated further until the fingers


14


are displaced sufficiently that adjacent fingers contact and may not be displaced further as shown in FIG.


3


. In the present embodiment this creates a physical stop limiting further adjustment sleeve rotation and also defining a full choke condition. Various other physical stops are contemplated including a rigid radial extending element on the bore sleeve that axially or radially contacts and stops the skirt trailing edge


24


. The relative position of the adjustment sleeve


6


and therefore the condition of choke is indicated by the relative positions of the skirt trailing edge


24


and the circumferential grooves


22


. In the figures, the three spaced grooves


22


are located on the sleeve bore


4


to align axially with the trailing edge


24


at the conditions of zero, mid and full choke, respectively. The grooves are defined by raised lands


20


which have a maximum radial dimension less than the internal diameter of the adjustment sleeve


6


to enable the adjustment sleeve


6


to move over the lands


20


. Preferably, the visibility of the grooves are enhanced by filling them with a highly visible pigment or other coloration element. Unlike discrete indicia, such as numeric indicators which must be viewed from within a limited angle of view, the circumferential grooves are easily viewed from any position about the choke. In alternative embodiments, more or less than three grooves are used to indicate various relative choke conditions.




The particular range of choke condition provided by the present choke may be altered in a variety of ways. The minimum choke condition—in place of a straight bore as described above—may be a partial choke condition. This may be accomplished by having a preset minimum deflection of the fingers at the minimum choke stop. Alternatively, the fingers may be milled with a converging taper on their inside surfaces to provide a minimum choke when the fingers are undeflected. Other variations are also contemplated in other embodiments.





FIGS. 4



a


and


4




b


are two cross-sectional views of the configurations of

FIGS. 2 and 3

.

FIG. 4



a


shows the relative position of the adjustment sleeve


6


, bore sleeve


4


, and interlocking spring clip


42


. The spring clip is a stiff but resilient element that is rotationally fixed to the bore sleeve


4


by a down-turned arm


44


that is secured in a counterbore


46


in the bore sleeve


4


. The spring clip


42


wraps around the bore sleeve


4


somewhat greater than 180 degrees to help retain the spring clip


42


to the bore sleeve. A spring clip end


40


rises at an angle to insert into the adjustment skirt aperture


32


. The spring clip


42


is configured to bias the spring clip end


40


outward. The location of the aperture and the spring clip end is such that the adjustment sleeve is stopped at the point of zero choke. When the adjustment sleeve


6


is rotated to the zero choke position (moved to the right in

FIGS. 2 and 3

) the spring clip end


40


automatically springs into the aperture


32


to block further rotation. This operation is important for safety by preventing inadvertent loosening or removal of the adjustment sleeve. The width of the spring clip end is slightly less than the aperture. When the adjustment sleeve is rotated to increase effective choke (left to right in

FIGS. 2 and 3

) the angle of the spring clip


42


adjacent the clip end


40


allows the spring clip end


40


to slide out of the aperture


32


and allow the adjustment sleeve


6


to rotate. The spring clip end


40


slides with friction against the inside surface of the adjustment sleeve


6


which is beneficial to prevent a loose fit. The spring clip


42


has a protruding ovulated portion


48


which also bears against the adjustment sleeve to increase friction and ensure stability of the adjustment sleeve. The bore sleeve includes an outer retention groove


50


between the external threads


16


and the circumferential lands


20


. The form and shape of the spring clip is such as to fit within the retention groove


50


. Complete removal of the adjustment sleeve


6


may be accomplished by depressing the spring clip end


40


via the aperture


32


to allow the adjustment sleeve


6


to rotate past the zero choke position. An important benefit of the present spring clip design as a physical stop is its short overall radial dimension. The spring clip


42


may be formed of any of a variety of high strength steels, most preferably from what is commonly specified as 1065 and 1078 high carbon steel.




The above design features are directed in part to accomplishing a goal of minimizing radial profile. The internal threaded connection to the shotgun barrel is essential for this purpose. Following the above example for a 12 gauge shotgun, a variable choke according to the present invention was fabricated having a maximum overall radial dimension of one inch (2.54 cm)—approximately equal the outer diameter of a typical 12 gauge sport shotgun. Any radial dimension of ¼ inch or more greater than the connected shotgun outside diameter is considered too large due to resulting obstruction to sight and impaired esthetics. In the above description of examples of the present invention, the novel combination of design elements results in variable choke that is easier to use and provides improved performance over prior known devices. The preceding discussion is provided for example only. Other variations of the claimed inventive concepts will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Adaptation or incorporation of known alternative devices and materials, present and future is also contemplated. The intended scope of the invention is defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. An improved adjustable low profile shotgun choke for attachment to shotguns having internal threads within the shotgun muzzle, the choke comprising:an inner sleeve having a bore and having: a first end and second end, first external threads adjacent the first end, a plurality of separated longitudinal fingers adjacent the second end, second external threads between the first and second end; an adjustment sleeve having inner threads engaged with the inner sleeve second external threads and the adjustment sleeve having a tapered inner adjustment surface, the adjustment surface contacting the flexible fingers, such that when the adjustment sleeve is rotated about the inner sleeve, the adjustment surface forces the fingers into a more converging condition; a first and second stop limiting rotation of the adjustment sleeve with respect to the inner sleeve at a minimum and maximum choke position, respectively.
  • 2. The choke of claim 1, wherein:the first stop comprises: a resilient clip between the inner sleeve and adjustment sleeve, the clip rotationally connected to the inner sleeve, and the clip having a clip end biased toward the adjustment sleeve; and the adjustment sleeve has an aperture receiving, in an open condition, the clip end such as prevent the adjustment sleeve from rotating past the open condition.
  • 3. The choke of claim 1, further comprising:indicia configured to indicate the position of the adjustment sleeve and visible from any radial position relative to the choke.
  • 4. The choke of claim 3, wherein:the indicia consists of at least one circumferential groove.
  • 5. The choke of claim 4, wherein:the choke is configured for a 12 gauge shotgun; and the choke has a maximum radial dimension of one inch.
  • 6. The choke of claim 5, wherein:the adjustment sleeve is formed substantially from titanium.
  • 7. An improved shotgun having a removable choke capable of delivering shot in variable patterns, comprising:a shotgun body having a barrel mouth having internal threads, and secured to the internal threads the device of claim 1.
US Referenced Citations (29)
Number Name Date Kind
688227 Cory Dec 1901 A
1455661 Rhinehart May 1923 A
1679048 Miller Jul 1928 A
2558200 Schmeling Jun 1951 A
2600874 Hoza Jun 1952 A
2629958 Roper et al. Mar 1953 A
2634537 Velez et al. Apr 1953 A
2656637 Richards Oct 1953 A
2656638 Cobb Oct 1953 A
2662326 Powell Dec 1953 A
2663961 White Dec 1953 A
2676429 Gotterson Apr 1954 A
2685144 Schroeder Aug 1954 A
2700839 Finlay et al. Feb 1955 A
2712193 Mathis Jul 1955 A
2759286 Moore Jul 1956 A
2866288 Herter Dec 1958 A
2894348 Cutts Jul 1959 A
2968111 Steane Jan 1961 A
3045378 Denaux Jul 1962 A
4058925 Linde et al. Nov 1977 A
4510843 Rabatin Apr 1985 A
4713904 Anderson et al. Dec 1987 A
4726280 Frye Feb 1988 A
4951409 Froid Aug 1990 A
5133143 Knight Jul 1992 A
5706598 Johnston Jan 1998 A
6032398 Carpenteri et al. Mar 2000 A
6052935 Howard Apr 2000 A