The present invention pertains to improved methods and apparatus providing support to a portion of the urethra or rectum or anus to alleviate urinary or fecal incontinence and particularly to elongated slings having mechanisms for selectively adjusting the tension applied through the sling to body tissue.
Urinary incontinence is a condition characterized by involuntary loss of urine, beyond the individual's control, that results in the loss or diminution of the ability to maintain the urethral sphincter closed as the bladder fills with urine. Male or female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurs when the patient is physically or emotionally stressed. Such patients may also experience urge incontinence.
Fecal incontinence is a condition characterized by involuntary defecation or passage of feces through the anal canal due to injury to or weakness of one or more of the internal anal sphincter, the external anal sphincter, and the levator ani.
Implantable urethral and anal prosthetic sphincter systems have been disclosed in the prior art to treat incontinence that comprise an inflatable balloon that is either pillow or cuff shaped, a balloon reservoir/pressure, source filled with a fluid, a pump, and interconnecting tubing. The balloon is implantable beneath or surrounding the urethral tract (at or near the bladder neck in female patients) or the external anal sphincter and is coupled through tubing to the balloon reservoir/pressure source and pump that are implanted subcutaneously. The pump may be manually actuated to inflate the balloon compress the urethral tract to prevent incontinence and to deflate the balloon to allow voiding. Examples of such prosthetic sphincter systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,222,377, 4,571,749, and 5,562,598, and one such system comprises the AMS-800 Urinary Control System available from American Medical Systems, Inc.
Urethral tapes or slings have been developed that are implanted in a urethral sling procedure in which the urethral sling is inserted beneath the urethra and advanced in the retro pubic space, perforating the abdominal fascia. In one procedure, peripheral or end portions of the elongated urethral sling are affixed to bone or body tissue, and a central support portion of the elongated urethral sling extends under the urethral or bladder neck to provide a platform that compresses the urethral sphincter, limits urethral distention, and pelvic drop, and thereby improves coaptation. Elongated “self-fixating” slings have also been clinically introduced for implantation in the body that do not require that the end portions be physically attached to tissue or bone and that rely upon tissue ingrowth into sling pores to stabilize the sling as disclosed, for example, in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,382,214, 6,612,977, 6,641,524, 6,648,921, 6,652,450, 6,702,827, 6,802,807, and 6,911,003 and publications and patents cited therein.
The above-described slings comprise a central portion that is adapted to support the urethra, two end portions bracketing the support portion, a protective sheath or sheaths encasing at least the end portions, and connectors at the ends of the sling. Various ways of attaching a sleeve end and sling mesh end to a connector are detailed in the above-referenced '450 patent, for example. Further ways of attaching sling ends to sling implantation tools are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2004/0087970, 2005/0245787, and 2005/0250977. The sling implantation tools are employed to form tissue pathways extending from a vaginal incision to two abdominal skin incisions and to draw the sling end portions through the pathways to dispose the sling free ends out of the skin incisions and the central portion around the urethra. The connectors are detached from the sling ends, and the sheaths are drawn out of the skin incisions, allowing the incisions to be closed.
Sling tension is typically adjusted at implantation sufficiently to take up any slack in the sling and impart at least a degree of increased tension to the urethra with the bladder empty. A surgical instrument may be placed between the sling central portion and the urethra, the sling ends drawn to tension and fully close the urethral tract, and the instrument withdrawn so that the uethra is relaxed sufficiently to function. Alternative tension adjustment techniques that may be employed during implantation are disclosed in the above-referenced commonly assigned '827 and '921 patents:
Typically, such urethral tapes or slings are fabricated of a loose weave sling fabric or mesh that acutely engages tissue and encourages tissue ingrowth along the pathway through mesh pores to achieve chronic stabilization or “self-fixation. Tissue ingrowth takes about 2-3 weeks in the typical patient in the absence of any significant intentional or unintentional movement of the mesh. During this post-operative time, the patient monitors the degree of success achieved in ameliorating leakage and any discomfort that might occur if the applied tension is so high as to unduly slow voluntary urination.
If any such problems occur, it may be necessary to reopen the incisions to access and pull on the sling ends to tighten the sling central portion around the urethra or to reopen the vaginal incision to pull on the sling central portion to loosen the sling central portion around the urethra. Several approaches have been taken to simplify or reduce the need for such post-operative adjustments.
One tension adjustment complication arises from the fact that the loose weave sling mesh inherently stretches and elongates when tension is applied at the ends or central support portion to overcome resistance of the tissue bearing against the sling mesh along the tissue pathway. It is difficult to judge just how much tension to apply to achieve adequate tightening or loosening in the central support portion. In one approach to overcoming this complication disclosed, for example, in the above-referenced '450 patent, an elongated repositioning means, e.g., an elongated inextensible tensioning member, is incorporated extending in or along the sling mesh from near the sling ends to or through the sling central portion. Tension applied to the repositioning means is transmitted along the length of the sling so the sling mesh does not substantially stretch during initial positioning and any repositioning during the acute healing phase.
In another approach disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0058574 (
Other approaches that enable increasing tension of the sling central portion against the urethra involve shortening the lengths of the sling end portions as described, for example in the above-referenced, commonly assigned '921 patent. Mesh folds are formed in the sling end portions using filaments that extend through vaginal incisions externally of the body. Depending on the embodiment, the mesh folds can be released to decrease sling tension or be tightened to increase sling tension by pulling on the filament ends following the initial implantation procedure. In other embodiments, filaments are extended substantially through the lengths of the sling end portions and extend from the vaginal incisions. The filaments may be gripped and pulled to tighten the mesh in the sling end portions to increase overall sling tension.
In still another approach disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0058574 (
In yet another approach, tape or sling ends or the end of a tensioning cable coupled to a urethral support mechanism are coupled to a tensioning device that is chronically implanted subcutaneously and can be accessed to adjust sling tension. See, for example, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,969,892 and further U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,474,518 and 6,117,067 and the REMEEX® readjustable sling by Neomedic, Intl. (www.remeex.com). Ratchet or gear mechanisms that are accessed using a driver inserted through the skin and thereby rotated to increase or decrease sling tension are disclosed in the '892 and '518 patents. An inflatable/deflatable, elastic chamber, mechanism that incorporates a fill port that is penetrable by a syringe needle advanced through the skin is disclosed in the '067 patent. The adjustment forces are applied to the sling ends and must be transmitted through the sling to effect any change in tension along the sling central portion adjacent the urethra.
Further sling tension adjustment and maintenance techniques involve adding tensioning filaments to the sling free ends and extending the elements through the skin incisions and into engagement with buttons or pads implanted subcutaneously engaging a muscle or rectus fascia layer and/or having tissue engaging elements or anchors along the filament that engage subcutaneous tissues as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,911,002 and in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0004576 and 2006/0089525.
Although effective in alleviating SUI, further improvements in urethral and fecal slings to post-operatively adjust tension applied to the urethra or anus are desirable.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention incorporate a number of inventive features that address problems in the prior art that may be combined as illustrated by the preferred embodiments or advantageously separately employed.
The present invention involves improvements in an elongated incontinence sling, or simply sling, comprising a central support portion and end portions extending from the central portion to sling ends. Herein, use of the term sling or the expression “incontinence sling” without further qualification shall embrace urethral slings adapted to be placed through a tissue pathway disposing the central support portion between the urethra or bladder neck (hereafter collectively referred to as the urethra for convenience) and the vaginal wall to alleviate urethral incontinence and fecal slings adapted to be placed through a tissue pathway disposing the central support portion inferior to the anus, the anal sphincter or the lower rectum (hereafter collectively referred to as the anus for convenience) to alleviate fecal incontinence. Certain embodiments employ tensioning filaments or lines or cables or sutures that are referred to as “sutures” for convenience.
In accordance with the present invention, such slings are improved to enhance post-operative sling adjustment of the tension applied to the urethra or anus to enhance efficacy and patient comfort. The various embodiments disclosed herein are applicable to both males and females, to address issues of incontinence in both, to address issues of prolapse repair in female and perineal floor descent, as well as fecal incontinence in both. Also surgical techniques such as forming suprapubic, retropubic, transobturator, inside out, outside in tissue pathways between two skin incisions, or a tissue pathway formed from a single incision through the vagina or perineal floor (in male or female patients) are also contemplated for passage of a sling therethrough.
In one preferred embodiment of a sling of the present invention, a sling adjustment mechanism is incorporated into or on a section of one or preferably both of the sling end portions proximal to but spaced from the central support portion that can be adjusted at least in the acute post-operative healing phase to directly adjust tension of the end portions and indirectly adjust tension of the central support portion. The spacing of the sling adjustment mechanism from the central support portion is selected in relation to the patient's anatomy to facilitate access or engagement with an externally applied adjustment actuator or an actuator element extending percutaneously from a skin incision and to effectively transmit tension along the sling to the central support portion. The adjustment mechanisms are generally adjusted to adjust the length and/or tension of the end portions to thereby tension the center support portion and draw it closer to the urethra or anus or to relax tension of the center support portion to release pressure on the urethra or anus.
In certain embodiments, the sling adjustment mechanism comprises one or more suture extending from a point of attachment with one or more of the sling end portions to a suture free end and a sling tensioning device coupled to the suture free end that can be manipulated to increase or decrease sling tension.
In certain embodiments, the sling adjustment mechanism alternatively or further comprises mesh folds formed of sections of the sling mesh In the sling end portions that define adjustment spacings, and tensioning sutures that are stitched through mesh pores of the mesh folds to maintain the mesh fold during implantation and to function as draw strings for later adjustment during the acute healing phase. In certain embodiments, the suture free ends are adapted to be extended through skin incisions during implantation thereby enabling manual tension adjustment during the acute healing phase. The suture free ends may be grasped and pulled to pull the sling folds tighter together to decrease the adjustment spacing and thereby decrease the sling length and increase tension applied by the center support portion to the urethra.
In one variation, the sling tensioning devices incorporated into the sling end portions or sling free ends that extend percutaneously through the skin incisions made to install the sling to enable application of tension to or to release tension during at least in the acute post-operative healing phase to directly adjust tension of the end portions and indirectly adjust tension of the central support portion. For example, sutures extending from the subcutaneously implanted sling free ends are extended through the skin incisions made in the implantation of the sling to be manipulated by pulling or twisting during the acute post-operative healing phase to directly adjust tension of the end portions and indirectly adjust tension of the central support portion.
In other preferred embodiments, a tensioning band extends along at least a section of the sling end portions to apply sling tension along the section by or twisting the band. The free end of the band may be coupled to tensioning devices outside the patient's body.
The suture or band free ends and any tensioning devices coupled thereto may be severed at the skin incisions following adjustment.
In certain preferred embodiments, the sling end portions may be implanted within biodegradable sheaths that make it possible to more easily pull upon or twist the sling end portions until the sheaths dissolve in the body. In other embodiments, the tensioning suture(s) are extended through the lumens of tubes that make it possible to more easily pull upon or twist the sling end portions. The tubes may be biodegradable in the body.
In a further aspect of the invention, the sutures extending from the sling free ends of each of the embodiments disclosed herein are coupled to one or more sling tensioning devices that are subcutaneously implanted in abutting relation to a supporting tissue such as the rectus fascia or the transobturator membrane that the tissue pathway is formed through. Post-operative adjustment of sling tension is contemplated by operating the tensioning device(s) through use of an external adjustment actuator. For convenience, such subcutaneous muscle layers, the rectus fascia or the transobturator membranes or other membranes and fascia are simply referred to as “tissue layers” herein.
In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the tensioning device(s) comprises a rotatable bobbin that the suture(s) extends around and that can be rotated to release or draw in a length of suture(s) thereby decreasing or increasing sling tension. In one embodiment, the external adjustment actuator is a tool that is inserted percutaneously (penetrating the skin) to engage and operate the sling adjustment mechanism to increase or decrease the adjustment spacing. Alternatively, it is possible to dissect down to adjustment mechanism. Various sling tensioning devices are provided that can be rotated by the tool in one direction to draw the sling intermediate ends together to increase sling tension and that can be rotated in the other direction to allow the sling intermediate ends to separate apart to decrease sling tension.
In certain embodiments, a tissue anchor is coupled to at least one sling end adapted to be passed through body tissue to anchor the sling end against a tissue layer to stabilize the sling end and facilitate adjustment of sling tension.
Thus, the sling tension adjustment mechanism comprises one or more of a sling tensioning suture or band, a tensioning device coupled to a suture or band free end, a tissue anchor coupled to one or more of a suture free end and a sling end, a mesh fold, a suture tube, and a sling sheath in various combinations.
This summary of the invention has been presented here simply to point out some of the ways that the invention overcomes difficulties presented in the prior art and to distinguish the invention from the prior art and is not intended to operate in any manner as a limitation on the interpretation of claims that are presented initially in the patent application and that are ultimately granted.
These and other advantages and features of the present invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, when considered in conjunction with the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate identical structures throughout the several views, and wherein:
The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale.
The various embodiments of the present invention are implemented in slings suitable for and methods of implanting such slings in the treatment of male and female urinary and fecal incontinence and to effect pelvic floor, perineal floor, and pelvic proplapse repairs employing a variety of surgical approaches. For example, female pelvic floor repair slings may be implanted by techniques that involve transvaginal, transobturator, suprapubic, pre-pubic, or transperineal exposures or pathways, and male urinary incontinence slings may be implanted by techniques that involve transobturator, suprapubic, or transperineal pathways. Any of the disclosed embodiments can be used as fecal incontinence slings which may be implanted by techniques that involve transvaginal, transobturator, suprapubic or via perineal floor pathways. In fecal incontinence applications, the disclosed embodiments can be used to correct the anorectal angle in the rectum to re-establish continence in patients. The above methods can, but are not necessarily limited to, utilize helical needles of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,911,003 or C-shaped needles or elongate needles of the type used to perform suprapubic procedures.
Referring to
The depicted exemplary sling assembly 10 thus extends between sling end connectors 12 and 14 that engage with the free ends of right hand and left hand sling implantation tools (non-suprapubic) of the types described above, for example. The sling end connectors 12 and 14 are shaped to dilate the right and left passages or pathways through body tissue formed by the curved needles of the right and left hand implantation tools in the above-described trans-vaginal or transobturator procedures, for example.
In this example, the sling 20 is enclosed within protective sheaths 22 and 24 extending from the sling end connectors, 12 and 14, respectively, to respective free and open sheath ends 26 and 28. Preferably, the protective sheaths 22 and 24 are constructed of a flexible thin transparent plastic film that enables visual examination of the sling 20 and is sufficiently lubricious that it passes easily through the tissue pathways of the patient formed using the right hand and left hand sling implantation tools (non-suprapubic) of the types described above or otherwise created. The sheaths 22 and 24 can include sheath indicia or tear scores, perforations or holes for assisting the surgeon in properly orienting sling 20 relative to the urethra. Certain embodiments of the present invention involve modifications of the sheaths 22 and 24.
The sling 20 that is left in place chronically (following implantation and removal of sheaths 22 and 24 and end connectors 12 and 14) comprises an elongated, rectangular (in this depicted embodiment) braided or preferably knitted, mesh strip or simply mesh 30 as shown in
The sling 20 of sling assembly 10 is therefore similar to those the disclosed in the above-referenced '450 and '003 patents but is modified herein to incorporate one or more of the aspects of the present invention. It will be understood that the mesh 30 may be dimensioned shaped in a variety of ways known in the art for implantation in the treatment of male and female urinary and fecal incontinence and to effect pelvic floor, perineal floor, and pelvic proplapse repairs employing a variety of surgical approaches. For example, the sling 20 may comprise more than two end portions 42 and 44 coupled to connectors and extending at a variety of angles from a particularly shaped center portion 40.
In the implantation procedures described in the above-referenced '214, '450, and '524 patents and U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0043580 and 2005/0065395, the sling connector ends 12 and 14 are fitted to the implantation tools and the proximal end portions 42 and 44 are drawn through the body passageway or pathway. The central support portion 40 is adapted to be drawn against tissue to support the urethra or bladder neck or the anal sphincter or elsewhere in the pelvic region after the proximal end portions 42 and 44 are drawn through body pathways. The sling connector ends 12, and 14 are drawn out of the skin incision and detached from the implantation tool needle ends. The mesh 30 and sheaths 22 and 24 are severed just proximate to the connector ends 12 and 14, respectively. The remaining portions of the protective sheaths 22 and 24 are withdrawn over the mesh 30 and through the skin incisions. The sling 20 then remains in place, and tension adjustments are made to provide sufficient urethral or anal resistance to leakage. The sling can also provide support, in a related embodiment, to the anal sphincter or elsewhere in the pelvic region so as to return the tissue/muscles to its original anatomical position and support it as well. The incisions are closed upon completion of the tests, and tissue ingrowth into the pores of the mesh 30 takes place in a matter of weeks.
Before describing the embodiments of the invention, attention is directed to a step illustrated in
Referring to
At this point, the tension T that sling 20 applies against the urethra 58 or anus 67 is adjusted as schematically illustrated in
It will be understood that the embodiments of the sling of the invention may be modified by substituting other support materials than open pore mesh 30, particularly in the central support portion 40, e.g., homograft or allograft materials or nonporous synthetic materials. Moreover, other materials and structures may be substituted for the mesh 30 in the sections of constituting one or both of the end portions extending from the intermediate ends 38 and 48 to the ends of the central support portion 40. For example, one or more straight or spiral suture may be substituted for all or part of such sections.
Moreover, the central support portion 40 may take any shape that is found to be most suitable to support the urethral and anal tissues that are to be supported in use of the sling.
While not essential to the practice of the present invention, it may be desirable to provide mechanisms incorporated into or that act on the sling central support portion 40 to facilitate the adjustment of the tension T applied to the urethra 58 or the anus 67. For example, a sling central portion adjustment mechanism may be provided to increase and/or decrease the tension applied locally to the urethra 58 or the anus 67. The sling central portion adjustment mechanism is associated directly or indirectly with the sling central support portion 40 and is distinct from the sling adjustment mechanisms incorporated in the sling end portion or portions. For example, the sling central portion tension adjustment may simply comprise a suture extending around the sling central portion and passing through the skin incision to provide post-operative tension adjustment until the suture is withdrawn through the skin or is absorbed by the body.
Longer-term post-operative adjustment of the sling central portion tension may be accomplished with sling central portion adjustment mechanisms that remain in place. In one approach, the mechanism may be accessed for tension adjustment employing an external adjustment actuator that is percutaneously advanced through the skin 52 to engage the sling central portion adjustment mechanism. For example, one such approach involves injecting or withdrawing fluid from a fluid chamber of a pillow of the sling central portion adjustment mechanism applying pressure to the urethra 58 or the anus 67.
In certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, a sling adjustment mechanism is incorporated into or on a section of one or preferably both of the sling end portions 42 and 44 preferably proximal to but spaced from the central support portion 40 that can be adjusted at least in the acute post-operative healing phase. However, the boundary between the central support portion 40 and the sling end portions 42 and 44 is somewhat arbitrary unless the sling central portion is formed of a different material or has a differing width than the respective material or width of the sling end portions 42 and 44, So it will be understood that the sling intermediate ends described herein as located within the sling end portions or between the sling ends and the sling central portion embraces a location at the junction of the sling end portions 42 and 44 with the central support portion 40. The spacing of each sling adjustment mechanism from the central support portion is selected in relation to the patient's anatomy to facilitate access or engagement with an externally applied adjustment actuator or an actuator element extending percutaneously from a skin incision. The adjustment mechanisms are generally adjusted to adjust the length and/or tension of the end portions 42 and 44 to thereby tension the center support portion 40 and draw it closer to the urethra 58 or anus 67 or to relax tension of the center support portion 40 to release pressure on the urethra 58 or anus 67.
In certain embodiments, the end portion adjustment mechanisms are operated by actuator elements extending percutaneously through skin incisions 82 and 84 in the patient's skin to the sling end portions 42 and 44, respectively. In other preferred embodiments, implantable suture or tissue or sling end anchors or sling tension adjustment mechanisms are coupled to the sling ends to be implanted subcutaneously to maintain sling tension. Certain implantable tension adjustment mechanisms are adapted to be percutaneously accessed with a tension adjustment tool to adjust sling tension during chronic implantation. In certain embodiments, sutures extend from sling adjustment mechanisms incorporated in the sling end portion(s) to such implantable suture or tissue anchors or tension adjustment mechanisms.
A further sling adjustment mechanism can optionally be employed to engage and adjust the tension of the sling 20 at the central support portion 40 in the manner of suture 108 with suture ends 106 extending through vaginal incision 62 operable as described with respect to
One such embodiment is depicted in
A further adjustment suture 108 (optionally formed of biodegradable material) is optionally placed around the sling mesh 30 and extended through a skin or vaginal incision 62 (for urinary and fecal incontinence) to enable manual tension adjustment. The suture ends 106 may be grasped and pulled to function as an actuator element and pull the sling mesh away from the urethra 58 (or anus 67) to release tension applied by the center support portion 40 to the urethra 58 (or anus 67).
In the absence of adjustment suture 108, the sling central support portion 40 may be accessed by reopening the incision 62 to pull on the sling 20 to draw the sutures 116 and 118 back through the mesh pores, thereby increasing the sling length and decreasing tension applied by the center support portion 40 to the urethra 58 or anus 67.
Optionally, a biodegradable sheath of the type described above may be placed over the folds 122 and 124 to inhibit tissue ingrowth into the mesh pores and ease adjustment of the sling 20 until the sheath is absorbed and tissue ingrowth encapsulates and immobilizes sling mesh 30. Alternatively, in this and other folded mesh embodiments disclosed herein, the mesh 30 in mesh folds 122 and 124 may be coated with a material that inhibits or slows tissue ingrowth, or the sections of the mesh 30 forming mesh folds 122 and 124 may be formed of a material that inhibits or slows tissue ingrowth.
The suture ends 126, 128, and 106 may be severed at the respective incisions 82, 84, and 62 following final adjustment.
Turning to
In certain preferred embodiments, the sling end portions may be implanted within biodegradable sheaths that make it possible to more easily pull upon or twist the sling end portions until the sheaths dissolve in the body. Simple open ended, biodegradable sheaths 622 and 624 are disposed around the respective sling 42 and 44 as shown in
Preferably, the further adjustment suture 108 placed around the sling mesh 30 and extended through the skin incision 62 is employed to enable manual tension adjustment of the central support portion 40. During such adjustment to release tension applied to urethra 58, the sling mesh 30 may be stretched and pulled from the lumens of the sheaths 622, 624 and 632, 634 toward the urethra 58. The distal end openings 638 and 640 of the respective sheaths 632 and 634 are preferably narrowed to interfere with the sling mesh 30 retracting back into the sheath lumen, thereby helping to maintain the adjustment of the central support portion 40.
In
In
It will be understood that the flexible tubes 662 and 664 may be employed in the embodiments of
As noted above, the sutures 602, 604 may be twisted to shorten their length and increase sling tension.
Certain sling implantation procedures for urethral and fecal slings involve employing implantation instruments having needles that are advanced from a first skin incision to a second skin incision to form first and second or right and left tissue pathways around the urethra 58 or the anus 67. The instruments or other instruments are then employed to push or pull the sling end portions 42 and 44 through the first and second pathways to dispose the sling ends near or through the skin incisions 82 and 84 as shown in
Other sling implantation procedures for urethral and fecal slings have sling ends configured to engage sling implantation tool needle ends to be pushed from a single incision adjacent the urethra 58 or the anus 67 through first and second tissue pathways to dispose the sling end portions extending away from the urethra 58 or anus 67. The skin incisions 82 and 84 are not necessarily made, and the sling ends are disposed at subcutaneous locations.
Turning to
In this embodiment, the suture 116 passes through a slidable bore of the tissue anchor 96 and through the same skin incision 82 that the tissue pathway is created for the sling 20. Similarly, the suture 118 is depicted extending through a slidable bore of the tissue anchor 98 and through the same skin incision 84 that the tissue pathway is created for the sling 20. For example, the tissue pathway may extend through the right and left transobturator membranes (tissue layers 72 and 74) that the tissue anchors 96 and 98 are passed through and bear against. In a related embodiment, tissue anchors can be eliminated or substituted with tines on mesh face near the sling ends.
It will be understood that the tissue anchors 96 and 98 and the above-described procedures may be employed in any of the embodiments illustrated in
In a further variation of this embodiment of the invention depicted in
The suture 116 and tissue anchor 96 are pushed through a further tissue pathway such that the tissue anchor 96 is passed through and bears against a separate tissue layer 76 and then through a skin incision 86 (or a perineal or vaginal incision. Similarly, the suture 118 and tissue anchor 98 are pushed through a further tissue pathway such that the tissue anchor 96 is passed through and bears against a separate tissue layer 78 and then through a skin incision 88. Alternatively, the sutures 116 and 118 can first be passed by themselves through the skin incisions 86 and 88, respectively, and the tissue anchors 96 and 98 can be applied over the sutures 116 and 118 to bear against the tissue layers 76 and 78, respectively. In a related embodiment, sutures 116 and 118 can go through a bore in tissue anchors and can be fed down through to vaginal/perineal incision and the fold can be eliminated in this and other embodiments.
Tension can be applied by pulling on the suture ends of sutures 116 and 118, respectively while applying pressure against the subcutaneous tissue anchors 96 and 98, thereby tightening mesh folds 122 and 124. Tension on sutures 116 and 118 can be released to loosen mesh folds 122 and 124 by exposing and manipulating the tissue anchors 96 and 98.
It will be understood that the tissue layers 72, 74, 76, and 78 may comprise a muscle layer, fascia or transobturator membrane. Tissue layers 72 and 76 may be the same or a different tissue layer, and tissue layers 74 and 78 may be the same or a different tissue layer. The particular locations of skin incisions 86 and 88 and the respective tissue anchors 96 and 98 may include transobturator, abdominal, buttocks and perineal.
The tissue anchors 132, 134, 96, and 98 may take any of the forms disclosed in the above-referenced '002 patent and in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0004576 and 2006/0089525.
Turning to
The external adjustment actuator 210 may be shaped like a Keith needle having an engaging end 212 at the end of a shaft 214 attached to a handle 216. The tensioning devices 202 and 204 are shaped with actuator end receptacles 206 and 208, respectively, that can be manually palpated through the skin 52. During sling implantation, the actuator engaging end 212 and shaft 214 can be inserted percutaneously through skin incisions 82 and 84 to fit the actuator engaging end 212 into the actuator end receptacles 206 and 208. During chronic implantation, the skin incisions 82 and 84 can be reopened by inserting engaging end 212 through dissection of patient's skin 52 and into the actuator end receptacles 206 and 208, respectively.
The external adjustment actuator 210 is depicted in
The embodiment depicted in
It will be understood that that the sling 20 illustrated in
Moreover, the adjustment sutures 116 and 118 may be extended through sheathes or tubes that may or may not be biodegradable.
A simplified embodiment is illustrated in
The lengths of the sling end portions 42 and 44 depicted in
While the above-described embodiments depict methods and apparatus for adjusting sling tension in each sling end portion, in the preferred embodiment one adjustment mechanism may be provided acting on or within one sling end portion.
It will also be understood that the adjustment suture 108 (or other tension adjustment mechanism) acting on the central support portion 40 is depicted in the above-described figures simply as an option and not as a part of the sling end portion tension adjustment mechanisms and techniques.
In the embodiments described above, either one or two sutures or bands extend from each sling end portion 42 and 44. It will be understood that a single suture may be substituted for the pairs of sutures depicted extending from each sling end portion 42 and 44 in certain embodiments.
Turning to
It will be understood that the single tensioning device 310 may be substituted for the two separate sling tensioning devices 202 and 204 depicted in
Many of the embodiments described herein can be used in connection with prolapse and pelvic floor repairs (men and women) that may require post-operative adjustment of the implanted mesh or graft or sling. They may also be used in connection with prostatectomies or hysterectomies and to support any other body tissue within the pelvic area or other parts of the body including but not limited to, hernia repair, and shoulder and abdominal repairs. Examples of meshes, grafts and prolapse repairs are described in U.S. Publication Nos. 2004-0039453 A1, 2005-0250977 A1, and 2005-0245787 A1, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
All patents and publications referenced herein are hereby incorporated, by reference in their entireties.
This application claims benefit from International Application No. PCT/US2007/014780, having PCT Publication No. WO 2007/149593 A2, which was filed on 22 Jun. 2007, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/805,544 filed Jun. 22, 2006, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/806,664 filed Jul. 6, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/014780 | 6/22/2007 | WO | 00 | 7/26/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/149593 | 12/27/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979956 | Silvestrini | Dec 1990 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5203864 | Phillips | Apr 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5268001 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584860 | Goble et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647836 | Blake et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674247 | Sohn | Oct 1997 | A |
5690655 | Hart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725529 | Nicholson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782862 | Bonuttie | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873891 | Sohn | Feb 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904692 | Steckel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6007539 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6019768 | Wenstrom et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099551 | gabby | Aug 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168611 | Risvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319272 | Brenneman | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423072 | Zappala | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440154 | gellman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454778 | Kortenbach | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544273 | Harari et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635058 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648921 | Anderson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702827 | Lund | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6730110 | Harari et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6746455 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048682 | Neisz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056333 | Walshe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112171 | Rocheleau et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7198597 | Siegel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harai et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267645 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291104 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351196 | Goldmann et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7351197 | Montpetit et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364541 | Chu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402133 | Chu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413540 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422557 | Arnal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431690 | Merade et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494495 | Delorme et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513865 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527588 | Zaddem et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7547316 | Priewe et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7588598 | Delorme et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621865 | Gellman et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7691052 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753839 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762969 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794385 | Rosenblatt | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828715 | Haverfield | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010000533 | Kovac | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010023356 | Raz | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010027321 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041895 | Beyar et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022841 | Kovac | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035369 | Beyar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020050277 | Beyar | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055748 | Gellman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058959 | Gellman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082619 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091373 | Berger | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095064 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095163 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095181 | Beyar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099260 | Suslian et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128681 | Broome et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138025 | Gellman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156487 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156488 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188169 | Kammerer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004395 | Therin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009181 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023136 | Raz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023137 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023138 | Luscombe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045774 | Staskin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050530 | Neisz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015048 | Neisz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039453 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040138747 | Kaladelfos | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040193215 | Harari et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Kammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038451 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050090827 | Gedebou | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245787 | Cox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060058574 | Priewe et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122457 | Kovac | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173237 | Jacquetin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260618 | Hodroff et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | landgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080039678 | Montpetit et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090005634 | Rane | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090221867 | Ogdahl et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240102 | Rane et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259092 | Ogdahl et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010631 | Otte et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100094079 | Inman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152528 | Chapmenan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168505 | Inman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174134 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261950 | Lund et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261952 | Montpetit et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002241673 | Nov 2005 | AU |
2404459 | Aug 2005 | CA |
19544162 | Apr 1997 | DE |
20016866 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0650703 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1342450 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2852817 | Oct 2004 | FR |
1299162 | Apr 1998 | IT |
WO9310715 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9511631 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9716121 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9747244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9842261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9853746 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9916381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9937216 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9937217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9952450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9958074 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0064370 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0027304 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0030556 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0057796 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0057812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0139670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0228312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0228315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0238079 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239890 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO03013392 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO03003778 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03034939 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03073960 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03086205 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO03092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03096928 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03096929 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004045457 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2005004727 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005046511 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005048850 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005079702 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005094741 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005112842 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006007190 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006031879 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006069078 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2006002012 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007002071 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007011341 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007016083 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007016698 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007027592 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007081955 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007146784 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Introducing: AlloSling Fascia The Natural Choice for Suburethral Sling Provedures”, Advertisement from UroMed Corporation (1 page). |
Advantage A/T™, Surgical Mesh Sling Kit, Boston Scientific, 6 pages (2002). |
Albert H. Aldridge, B.S., M.D., F.A.C.S., Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V. 44, pp. 398-411, (1948). |
AlloSource product literature (11pages). |
Amundsen, Cindy L. et al., Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women Who Also Require a Pubovaginal Sling, The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, pp. 1770-1774, (May 2003). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, pp. 2316-2320 (Dec. 1994). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension, Urology, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 409-418 (Nov. 1992). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 145, pp. 1214-1218 (Jun. 1991). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment, Surgical Forum, pp. 473-475, (1984). |
Blavis, Jerry, Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, pp. 93-101 (1990). |
Bryans, Fred E., Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, pp. 292-294 (Feb. 1979). |
Capio™ CL—Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device—Transvaginal Suture Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, Microvasive®, 8 pages, (2002). |
Choe, Jong M. et al., GORE-TEX Patch Sling: 7 Years Later, Urology, vol. 54, pp. 641-646 (1999). |
Dargent, D. et al., Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, pp. 576-582 (2002). |
Decter, Ross M., Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Earned, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, pp. 683-686 (Aug. 1993). |
Delorme, Emmanuel, Trans-Obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) English Abstract attached. |
Falconer. C. et al., Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp. 2, pp. S19-S23 (2001). |
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence. The tension-free solution to female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldwide,6 pages, (2002). |
Handa, Victoria L. et al, Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88 No. 6, 5 pages (Dec. 1996). |
Kersey, J., The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation of the Treatment of Stress Incontintence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, pp. 945-949 (Oct. 1983). |
Klutke, John M.D. et al, The promise of tension-free vaginal tape for female SUI, Contemporary Urology, 7 pages (Oct. 2000). |
Korda, A. et al., Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, pp. 150-154 (May 1989). |
Kovac, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?, Contemporary OB/GYN, 10 pages (Feb. 1998). |
Morgan, J. E., A Sling Operation, Using Marlex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obst. & Gynecol, pp. 369-377 (Feb. 1970). |
Nichols, David H., The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, pp. 88-93 (Jan. 1973). |
Niknejad, Kathleen et al., Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, pp. 597-611 (2002). |
Norris, Jeffrey P. et al., Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, pp. 227-230 (Jun. 1996). |
O'Donnell, Pat, Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, pp. 389-392 (Jan. 1992). |
Ostergard, Donald R. et al., Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice, pp. 569-579 (1996). |
Pelosi, Marco Antonio III et al., Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advaned Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1 pp. 45-50 (1999). |
Ridley, John H., Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure, American Journal Obst & Gynec., vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 741-721 (Jul. 1, 1986). |
SABRE™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor, 4 pages (May 2002). |
SABRE™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 6 pages (Aug. 2002). |
Sloan W. R. et al., Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings, The Journal of Urology, vol. 110, pp. 533-536 (Nov. 1973). |
Spencer, Julia R. et al., A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, pp. 441-415 (Mar. 1987). |
Stamey, Thomas A., M.D., Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females, Ann. Surgery, vol. 192 No. 4, pp. 465-471 (Oct. 1980). |
Stanton, Stuart L., Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women, Journal of American Geriatrics Society, vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 348-351 (Mar. 1990). |
Stanton, Stuart, Springer-Veglag, Surgery of Female Incontinence, pp. 105-113 (1986). |
Studdiford, William E., Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 764-775 (1944). |
TVT Tension-free Vaginal Tape, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 6 pages (1999). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7. pp. 81-86 (May 1996). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., A Three Year Follow Up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, pp. 345-350 (1999). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, pp. 75-82 (1995). |
Vesica® Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1995). |
Vesica® Sling Kits, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Boston Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1998). |
Walters, Mark D., Percutaneous Suburethral Slings: State of the Art, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, 29 pages (Oct. 2001). |
Drutz, H.P. et al., Clinical and Urodynamic Re-Evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, pp. 70-73 (1990). |
Precision Twist, Low Profile design for Precise Anchor Placement, Boston Scientific Microvasive, 2001 2 pp. |
Vesica Sling Kit, Microvasive Boston Scientific, 1997, 6pp. |
Precision Tack, The Precise Approach to Transvaginal Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, 1998, 4pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110124954 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60805544 | Jun 2006 | US | |
60806664 | Jul 2006 | US |