In some applications, the movement of a target should be relatively precisely measured and controlled. Failure to accurately measure movement of the target can cause device malfunction.
For example, in order for a printing device to create high-quality images, movement of paper and other types of media through the printing device should be relatively precisely measured and controlled. Failure to accurately measure movement of the media in an printing device can cause gaps or overlap in the resulting image as the image is formed on the media.
An optical sensor configured to capture images and measure distances can be used to measure advancement of the target. However, changes in the environment and related systems can cause the temperature of the optical sensor to change, and lead to thermal deformation of the elements making up the optical sensor. These temperature changes can distort the optics and cause the optical sensor to capture a deformed image of the target. The optics distortion and image deformation can cause the optical sensor to incorrectly measure the relative distances moved by the target.
The accompanying drawings illustrate various embodiments of the principles described herein and are a part of the specification. The illustrated embodiments are merely examples and do not limit the scope of the claims. Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical elements.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present systems and methods. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present apparatus, systems, and methods may be practiced without these specific details. Reference in the specification to “an embodiment”, “an example” or similar language means that a particular feature is included in at least that one embodiment, but not necessarily in other embodiments. The various instances of the phrase “in one embodiment” or similar phrases in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. The terms “comprises/comprising”, “has/having”, and “includes/including” are synonymous, unless the context dictates otherwise.
In an embodiment the optical module 130 contains an array of bright red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to provide adjustable and uniform illumination, and a lens system and aperture plate to project an image onto the image sensor 140. As used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “image” suggests an optically formed duplicate or other reproduction of an object formed by a lens or mirror, stored in digital format. In an embodiment the image sensor 140 is designed for high-speed imaging and fast data transfer, controls the electronics for the optical sensor and LEDs, and contains an EEPROM with factory calibration data for the optical sensor and optics.
Optical sensor 100 connects to a processor 150. In an embodiment optical sensor 100 connects to the processor 150 by ribbon cable. As used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “processor” suggests logic circuitry that responds to and processes instructions so as to control a system. In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in a printing device having a media advancing mechanism 160. As used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the term “printing device” can represent an inkjet, LaserJet, or any other printer technology that enables images to be printed onto a hard copy surface.
In an embodiment the processor 150 is configured to determine the precise motion of the media 170 from images received from the optical sensor 100, and this information is used by the printing device's media advance system 160 to control the movement of the media 170. In an embodiment, the images are one pixel wide and 512 pixels long.
In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are configured to compare the distance between fiducials 115 as measured at a “Time 1” in comparison to the measurement at “Time 2”. The processor 150 can compensate for thermal deformations by adjusting the measurement of the distance that the target traveled 185 by a compensation factor that is a function of the difference between the distance between fiducials 115 as measured at Time 1 in comparison the distance between fiducials 115 as measured at Time 2. As used in the present specification and in the appended claims, the terms “deformed” and “distorted” are use interchangeably and suggest a feature that is poorly formed or out of shape compared to the original. In an embodiment, Time 1 is machine startup, and Time 2 is when the distance the target moved is measured.
In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in a sheet-fed scanning device having a media advancing mechanism 160. In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in a flatbed scanning device having a mechanism for advancing a scan head. In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in microscope having a mechanism for advancing a slide or object to be viewed or measured. In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in a digital measuring microscope having a mechanism for advancing a slide or object or object to be viewed or measured. In an embodiment the optical sensor 100 and processor 150 are incorporated in a precision microelectronic assembly machine having a mechanism for advancing an assembly or components to be placed, assembled or measured.
The method continues at block 410 in which the optical sensor and a processor are utilized to calculate a distance that a target moved. In an embodiment, the target is media advancing through a printing device. In an embodiment, the target is a distinctive texture features on the back side of the media, so that measuring the distance the target moved will not require making marks on the media.
The method continues at block 420 in which a distance between the two fiducials is again calculated. In an embodiment, this recalculation could be triggered when the measured machine temperature reaching a threshold.
The method continues at block 430 in which the second distance is adjusted by a compensation factor that is a function of the difference between the first distance and the third distance. In an embodiment the compensation factor is the proportional difference between the first distance and the second distance.
An example of an application of the method is to employ the following expression: D(c)=D(m)*D(if)/D(df). The value D(if) is the initial distance between the fiducials. The value D(df) is the distorted distance between the fiducials at the moment of measuring the distance to a target. The value D(m) is the distance advanced by the target to be measured. The resulting value D(c) is the corrected measurement of distance to the target. In an embodiment, value D(c) may in turn be supplied to a processor or a mechanism that is advancing the target so as to more precisely control movement of the target.
The method continues at block 510 in which an optical sensor and a processor are utilized to capture images of a media advancing through a printing device at specified intervals.
The method continues at block 520 in which the captured images are compared to calculate a second distance that the media moved.
The method continues at block 530 in which a third distance between the two fiducials is calculated.
The method continues at block 540 in which the second distance is adjusted by the proportional difference between the first distance and the third distance.
The preceding description has been presented only to illustrate and describe embodiments and examples of the principles described. This description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit these principles to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6177214 | Yokoyama et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6834928 | Doval et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847432 | Osakabe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6929342 | Claramunt et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7281779 | Haushahn et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7391525 | Chapman et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20040056914 | Chun | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050013647 | Claramunt et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060170723 | Thiessen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080068420 | Yanagisawa et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090009751 | Taniguchi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100195121 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |