Priority is hereby claimed to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/485,844 entitled “ADJUSTMENT OF SKEW REGISTRATION OF MEDIA TO A DEVELOPED IMAGE IN A PRINTING MACHINE” filed Jul. 09, 2003.
Not applicable.
This invention is in the field of printing, and is more specifically directed to high-speed and high-precision electrographic printing.
Electrographic printing has become a prevalent technology in the modern computer-driven printing of text and images, on a wide variety of hard copy media. Tis technology is also referred to as electrographic marking, electrostatographic printing or marking, and electrophotographic printing or marking. Conventional electrographic printers are well suited for high resolution and high speed printing, with resolutions of 600 dpi (dots per inch) and higher becoming available even at modest prices. At these resolutions, modern electrographic printers and copiers are well-suited to be digitally controlled and driven, and are thus highly compatible with computer graphics and imaging. Examples of conventional printing machines with this capability include the DIGIMASTER 9110 network imaging system and the DIGIMASTER 9150i digital press, both available from Heidelberg USA, Inc.
A typical electrographic printer includes a primary image forming photoconductor, which may be a moving belt in large scale printers, or a rotating drum in smaller laser printers and photocopiers. The photoconductor is initially sensitized or conditioned by the application of a uniform electrostatic charge at a primary charging station in the printer. An exposure station forms an image on the sensitized photoconductor by selectively exposing it with light according to the image or text to be printed. The exposure station may be implemented as a laser, an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs), or a spatial light modulator. In modern electrographic printing, a computer typically drives the exposure station in a raster scan manner according to a bit map of the image to be printed. The exposing light discharges selected pixel locations of the photoconductor, so that the pattern of localized voltages across the photoconductor corresponds to the image to be printed.
At a developing or toning station in the typical electrographic printer, a developer roller or brush is biased to a bias voltage roughly at the primary charging voltage of the sensitized photoconductor prior to exposure. The biased developer roller or brush is loaded with toner, which is typically a mixture of a fine metallic powder with polyester resin and powdered dye, charged to the bias voltage. As the exposed photoconductor passes the developing station, toner is attracted to the discharged pixel locations of the photoconductor. As a result, a pattern of toner corresponding to the image to be printed appears on the photoconductor. This pattern of toner is then transferred to the medium (e.g., paper) at a transfer station. The transfer station charges the medium to an opposing voltage, so that the toner on the photoconductor is attracted to the medium as it is placed in proximity to the photoconductor.
The transferred toner becomes permanently fixed to the medium at the a fusing, or fixing, station that is located downstream from the transfer station. Conventional fusing stations apply heat and pressure to fuse the transferred toner to the medium, after which the then-printed medium travels to a finishing station in the printer for collating, sorting, stapling or other binding, and other finishing operations.
As mentioned above, modern electrographic printers have extremely high resolution capability. The high resolution that is achievable in the formation of the image on a medium has translated into stringent mechanical requirements on the remainder of the printing machine, including stringent requirements in the precision with which the medium is positioned relative to the photoconductor at the transfer station.
The overall precision of the image formation and mechanical positioning in modern printing machines is of special concern in certain printing applications. One example of a printing application with extreme position is the printing of election ballots that are to be machine read after marking by the voter. Anti-counterfeiting measures implemented by ballot reading machines rely upon extremely precise positioning of printed identifiers on the ballot; for example, modern ballot reading machines typically discard, as counterfeit, those ballots having their identifiers mispositioned by as little as twenty thousandths of an inch. Another printing application that requires extremely high precision is the printing of high-quality images on pre-printed media, in which the printed images may be required to be very precisely positioned relative to the existing images and text.
One important parameter in the positioning of media in a printing machine is referred to as “skew”. Skew refers to error in the rotational positioning, or angular deviation, of a sheet of the media to be printed at the transfer station.
In conventional printing machines, skew is controlled by way of one or more motors at a registration station that feeds sheets of media to the transfer station. U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,273, incorporated herein by this reference, describes an example of a conventional registration mechanism for placing sheets of a medium to be printed in registration with a photoconductor in a conventional printing machine. According to this conventional approach, a pair of motors are laterally separated from one another, and advance each sheet along the path toward the transfer station and photoconductor. These motors are individually and differentially controlled in response to the sensed position of the sheet along the path to remove skew in the medium relative to the path.
By way of further background, another approach to the elimination of skew in printing machines involves the differential driving of laterally spaced rollers to different velocities, responsive to a skew measurement. U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,384 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,442, both incorporated by reference herein, describe this differential velocity approach. According to this conventional control method, referring to
While these conventional printing machines are effective to remove skew to a significant degree, it has been observed in connection with this invention that the ultimate precision with which the skew is eliminated is still limited, especially relative to the extremely high precision required for some modern printing jobs, as mentioned above. Furthermore, while the precision of skew compensation in these conventional printing machines can be adjusted, such adjustment requires a service technician to take down the machine and effect the specific adjustment. Especially in the context of a print shop environment, this adjustment typically necessitates a service call, thus involving significant cost, as well as machine downtime (at least for precision printing jobs) while awaiting the service technician.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a printing machine in which the user can adjust the position of images as transferred to the media.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a printing machine in which the user can precisely adjust the skew of the printed media.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a printing machine in which the user can easily interface with the printing machine to effect the skew adjustment.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having reference to the following specification together with its drawings.
The present invention may be implemented into an electrographic printing machine, having a programmable controller for controlling the mechanical operation of the transfer station. The printing machine includes a human interface, such as a software “applet”, by way of which the human user can interactively enter a skew adjustment. The programmable controller effects the desired skew adjustment by adjusting the operation of independent positioning motors at a registration station in the printing machine, rotating the media sheet as it is forwarded toward the photoconductor.
The preferred embodiment of this invention will now be described in connection with its preferred embodiment. In this example, the preferred embodiment of the invention is a registration station upstream from a transfer station in an electrographic printer, considering that this invention is contemplated to be particularly beneficial in such an application. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having reference to this specification that this invention can also be used in any type of electrographic system, of any size or capacity, at any point in the machine at which precise positioning of media is desired. As such, this description is provided by way of example only, and is not intended or contemplated to limit the true scope of the invention as claimed.
Referring now to
Printer machine 10 includes logic and control unit (LCU) 24, preferably a digital computer or microprocessor operating according to a stored program for sequentially actuating the workstations within printer machine 10, effecting overall control of printer machine 10 and its various subsystems. LCU 24 is also programmed to provide closed-loop process control of printer machine 10 in response to signals from various sensors and encoders, in the conventional manner. In this manner, LCU 24 provides overall control of the apparatus and its various subsystems as is well known. LCU 24 will typically include temporary data storage memory, a central processing unit, timing and cycle control unit, and stored program control.
This description will frequently refer to LCU 24 as carrying out various computation and control functions and tasks. It is contemplated that those skilled in the art having reference to this specification will comprehend that LCU 24 may actually be implemented as a single microprocessor-based computer within printing machine 10, or alternatively by way of multiple microprocessors or microcontrollers distributed throughout printing machine 10, or alternatively by some other logic and control architecture. It is therefore to be understood that the references in this specification to LCU 24 as performing certain computation and control functions and tasks refers to logic and control circuitry in this general sense, and that these references are not to be interpreted as limiting the logic and control circuitry used in connection with this invention to any particular architecture or implementation.
Inputs to LCU 24 can be received by an input data processor or through an interrupt signal processor, and include input signals from various switches, sensors, and analog-to-digital converters internal to printing machine 10. LCU 24 may also receive inputs from sources external to printing machine 10, such from as a human user or over a computer network. According to the preferred embodiment of the invention, one source of such input signals is human interface 25a, which is a conventional touch screen or other input/output device that is coupled to LCU 24, by way of which the human operator can view the status of printing machine 10, enter selections for a print job, and control LCU 24 to execute utility applets for setting up and otherwise controlling printing machine 10. Alternatively, LCU 24 may receive inputs from a remote computer workstation, communicating with printing machine 10 via network interface 25b. In any case, LCU 24 controls the operation of printing machine 10 by way of control signals that are applied to suitable output drivers, and in turn to the appropriate subsystems within printing machine 10.
Primary charging station 28 in printer machine 10 sensitizes photoconductor 18 by applying a uniform electrostatic corona charge, from high-voltage charging wires at a predetermined primary voltage to surface 18a of photoconductor 18. Other forms of chargers, including brush or roller chargers, may also be used. This operation prepares a portion of photoconductor 18 for receipt of image information, which in this case is applied by exposure station 34 selectively discharging of locations of photoconductor 18.
At exposure station 34, writer 34aprojects light in a selected pattern to photoconductor 18. This light selectively dissipates the electrostatic charge on photoconductive photoconductor 18 to form a latent electrostatic image of the document to be copied or printed. Writer 34ais preferably constructed as an array of light emitting diodes (LEDs), or alternatively as another light source such as a laser or spatial light modulator. In any case, writer 34aexposes individual picture elements (pixels) of photoconductor 18 with light at a regulated intensity and exposure according to the image data to be printed, communicated from data source 36 via writer interface 32. Data source 36 is contemplated to be a computer or microcontroller, itself storing a bit map for the image in its own memory or receiving the bit map over a data network. The pattern of the image to be formed is applied to writer interface 32, along with control signals from logic and control unit 24 that indicate the position of photoconductor 18 at which this image is to be formed.
After exposure, the portion of photoconductor 18 bearing the latent charge images travels to development station 38. As conventional in the art, in this example, development station 38 includes a magnetic brush in juxtaposition to, but spaced from, the travel path of photoconductor 18. Alternatively, other known types of development stations or devices may be used, or plural development stations 38 may be provided for developing images in plural colors, or using toners having different physical characteristics.
Upon the imaged portion of photoconductor 18 reaching development station 38, LCU 24 selectively activates development station 38 to apply toner to photoconductor 18. Preferably, this activation is effected by LCU 24 controlling a mechanism to move backup roller 38a, and thus photoconductor 18, into engagement with or close proximity to the magnetic brush. Alternatively, the magnetic brush may be moved toward photoconductor 18 to selectively engage photoconductor 18. In either case, charged toner particles on the magnetic brush are selectively attracted to the latent image patterns present on photoconductor 18, developing those image patterns. As known in the art, conductor portions of development station 38, such as conductive applicator cylinders, are biased to act as electrodes. Examples of the developer mix used at development station include a two-component mix having a dry mixture of toner and carrier particles; alternatively, a single component developer or a conventional liquid toner may be used. Toner is supplied to development station 38 by motor-driven toner auger 39, under the control of LCU 24.
Registration station 45 in printing machine 10 move sheets of the media to be printed from source S into engagement with photoconductor 18, in registration with a developed image in a frame of photoconductor 18. Transfer station 46 then transfers the developed image from photoconductor 18 to the media sheet. The media printed by printing machine 10 may be plain or coated paper, plastic, transparency material, or another medium capable of being printed upon by printer machine 10. Typically, transfer station 46 includes a charging device for electrostatically biasing movement of the toner particles from photoconductor 18 to the receiving sheet. In this example, the biasing device is roller 46b, which engages the back of the media sheet and which is connected to programmable voltage controller 46a that operates in a constant current mode during transfer. Alternatively, an intermediate member may have the image transferred to it and the image may then be transferred to the media.
Registration station 45 controls the positioning of the media sheets at transfer station 46, so that each sheet reaches transfer station 46 in registration with a corresponding developed image on photoconductor 18. This registration includes registration in the in-track and cross-track directions, and also includes the correction of skew of the media sheets relative to the desired path of travel. The particular construction and operation of registration station 45 according to the preferred embodiment of the invention will be described in further detail below.
Cleaning station 48, such as a brush, blade, or web as is well known, is also located behind transfer station 46, and removes residual toner from photoconductor 18. A pre-clean charger (not shown) may be located before or at cleaning station 48 to assist in this cleaning. After cleaning, this portion of photoconductor 18 is then ready for recharging and re-exposure. Of course, other portions of photoconductor 18 are simultaneously located at the various workstations of printing machine 10, so that the printing process is carried out in a substantially continuous manner.
After leaving transfer station 46, each printed sheet is detacked from photoconductor 18. At this point, the sheet is carrying a pattern of toner corresponding to the image to be printed as defined by the charge pattern written at exposure station 34. This toner is not yet fused to the sheet at this point, but instead electrostatically adheres to the sheet. The imaged sheet then travels to fusing station (fuser) 49 where the image is fixed to the sheet. After fusing at fuser 49, the printed sheets then pass to finishing station 52 for collating, sorting, stapling, or the like, or alternatively pass to duplexer 54 if the opposite side of the printed sheets are also to be printed.
Referring now to
Registration station 45 also includes sensors 58a, 58b, 60a, 60b located at the plane of the transport path. Sensors 58, 60 are of conventional construction, and may be either optical or mechanical sensors as known in the art. Sensors 58a, 58b are paired with one another, and are laterally separated from one another along an axis that is perpendicular to the path center line PCTR, and that is positioned at or in advance of the position of urging rollers 56a, 56b relative to the transport path. Sensors 60a, 60b are similarly laterally separated from one another along an axis that is perpendicular to the path center line PCTR, but are downstream from sensors 58a, 58b. Preferably, sensors 58a, 60a are positioned along a line that is parallel to path center line PCTR, and similarly sensors 58b, 60b are positioned along a line that is also parallel to path center line PCTR but on an opposite side from the line defined by sensors 58a, 58b. Those skilled in the art having reference to this specification will comprehend that the positioning and numbers of sensors 58, 60 are somewhat arbitrary, so long as the presence and extent of skew of media registered by registration station 45 can be detected and measured. For example, offsets in the position of sensors can be calibrated out by LCU 24 or other computing circuitry in printing machine 10; especially considering the high precision required of printing machine 10 according to this invention, such calibration is preferably performed even if the desired location of sensors 58, 60 are arranged in the manner illustrated in
As described in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,273, U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,384, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,442, additional sensors may be deployed at registration station 45. These additional sensors are useful in connection with other registration functions, such as cross-track alignment and in-track alignment, as known in the art.
Referring back to
LCU 24 generates output control signals that are forwarded to motor drivers 50a, 50b, which in turn are associated with and control stepper motors 52a, 52b, respectively. In this manner, LCU 24 effects closed loop control of stepper motors 52a, 52b, at least partially in response to signals from sensors 58, 60 and other sensors within registration station 45. Such control is also contemplated to be under programmable control, as known in the art.
According to this preferred embodiment of the invention, LCU 24 is also coupled to receive, directly or indirectly, skew control inputs from a human operator via human interface 25a, network interface 25b, or the like. As will be described in further detail below, these skew control inputs provide LCU 24 with adjustment values, by way of which it controls the operation of motors 52a, 52b, and thus urging rollers 56a, 56b, respectively, to finely and precisely adjust the skew of media registered by registration station 45 on the path to transfer station 46 in printing machine 10. A preferred example of this operation of LCU 24, according to this preferred embodiment of the invention, to provide precise skew adjustment will now be described in detail relative to
In either event, a display screen is presented to the operator to request and interactively receive the skew adjustment value.
In this example, process 64 (
Referring back to
In the general case, once the print job is initiated (process 68) and the timing adjustment derived (process 69), skew adjustment according to the preferred embodiment of the invention is effected as a medium sheet as it is advanced through registration station 45. At this point, skew adjustment is then effected by LCU 24 differentially controlling stepper motors 52a, 52b by an amount corresponding to the desired skew adjustment value entered by the operator. This differential control skews the medium sheet by the desired amount as it is forwarded by registration station 45 to transfer station 46, thus skewing the sheet in such a manner as to receive the exposed image at the precisely defined location specified by the skew adjustment value. Process 69 according to the preferred embodiment of the invention will be described in further detail below.
In carrying out the print job, printing machine 10 of course advances sheets of the appropriate media (e.g., paper stock) from the paper supply S through registration station 45 to transfer station 46, at which point the exposed and developed image is transferred to each sheet. In this embodiment of the invention, registration station 45 carries out its operation upon sensors 58 detecting the leading edge of a media sheet in process 70. As described above, in this embodiment of the invention, motors 52a, 52b are independently activated in response to the sensing of the leading edge of the sheet, causing urging rollers 56a, 56b to advance the sheet along the transfer path, in process 72. Other registration actions may also be effected at this time, including in-track and cross-track registration of the media sheet. Upon the detection of the leading edge of the sheet by downstream sensors 60 in process 74, the skew correction and adjustment according to the preferred embodiment of the invention is effected by control of motors 52a, 52b in process 76.
Referring now to
According to this embodiment of the invention, LCU 24 next calculates the appropriate timing delays in the deactivating of motors 52a, 52b, thus skewing the media at registration station 45 according to the retrieved skew adjustment value, in process 87. Referring back to
As described above and in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 5,322,273, registration station 45 according this embodiment of the invention activates its motor 52a upon the leading edge of a media sheet being detected by sensor 58a, and activates motor 52b upon the leading edge of the sheet being detected by sensor 58b. Registration station 45 also deactivates its motor 52a upon the leading edge of the sheet being detected by sensor 60a, and deactivates motor 52b upon the leading edge being detected by sensor 60b; this independent deactivation of motors 52a, 52b removes skew in the media as it is advanced by registration station 45 to transfer station 46 in printing machine 10. In process 69, LCU 24 calculates adjustments to the timing of the deactivation of motors 52 by times corresponding to the skew adjustment distance entered by the operator in process 64, thus effecting the desired adjustment.
Preferably, according to this embodiment of the invention, a null delay time for the deactivation of motors 52a, 52b is implemented by LCU 24 via motor drivers 50a, 50b, respectively. This permits LCU 24 to either advance or delay the deactivation of motors 52, relative to this null delay time. Accordingly, in process 87, LCU 24 calculates left and right timing delays that modify the delay time between the sensing of a leading edge of a media sheet by sensors 60a, 60b and the deactivating of motors 52a, 52b, respectively. In effect, process 87 carries out a conversion of the skew adjustment distance entered by the operator in process 64 into a timing difference in the control of motors 52a, 52b that will effect the appropriate rotation (or change in rotation), resulting in the desired precision adjustment of the skew. It is contemplated that those skilled in the art will be readily able to implement the appropriate computer program executed by LCU 24 to effect the calculation of process 87, considering the inputs from the operator in process 64 involving the desired skew adjustment and the length of the media.
The left and right timing delays calculated in process 87 may be implemented in various ways. For example, the calculated timing delays may advance the deactivation of one of motors 52a, 52b and retard the deactivation of the other, by decrementing the delay time from the null value for the advanced one of motors 52a, 52b and incrementing the delay time from the null value for the other. Alternatively, the calculated timing delay may be applied to only one of motors 52a, 52b, by either adding delay to or subtracting delay from the null value for one motor, while making no change to the deactivation delay of the other motor. It is contemplated that those skilled in the art having reference to this specification will be readily able to implement the calculation of the timing delays to effect the skew adjustment in any one of these, or other, approaches for each particular application.
As described above, the control of motors 52a, 52b is effected substantially independently from one another, regardless of the relative timing of the sensed leading edges. Accordingly, as shown in
Registration station 45 is now ready to effect the desired skew adjustment, as well as conventional skew correction for any undesired skew in the sheet, responsive to the sensing of the leading edge of a media sheet by sensors 60a, 60b. Referring first to the left side, the leading edge of the media sheet is sensed by sensor 70a as it is advanced through registration 45 by activated motor 52a and urging roller 56a. In response to this detection, which is communicated by sensor 60a to LCU 24, LCU 24 waits for the delay time calculated in process 87, which amounts to the null delay time plus or minus the delay corresponding to the skew adjustment. Upon the elapse of that delay time, LCU 24 then issues a signal to motor driver 50a to deactivate motor 52a, in process 91a.
Similarly, the leading edge of the sheet reaching sensor 60b is detected in process 74b, at such time as that edge arrives. LCU 24 then effects the calculated delay, in process 90b, such delay similarly amounting to the null delay time plus or minus the adjustment calculated in process 87. Upon the elapse of this delay time, LCU 24 then deactivates motor 52b, in process 91b.
The operation of processes 74, 76 thus effect both the correction of undesired skew, and the implementation of desired skew adjustment selected by the operator in process 64. The sensing by downstream sensors 60a, 60b and the corresponding differential deactivating of motors 52a, 52b in response to this sensing theoretically removes skew in the media sheet. This is because the later of the two motors 52 to be deactivated continues to rotate its corresponding urging roller 56 while the other is stopped, rotating the paper and correcting the skew. Theoretically, this removes skew in the sheet as it is registered. However, this skew removal may not be exact in practice, considering machine tolerances, machine wear, temperature variations, and other sources of mechanical error.
According to this invention, however, the skew removal is adjustable under operator control, by the invoking of the skew adjustment applet in process 62 and the selection of a skew adjustment by the operator in process 64. It is contemplated that this skew adjustment will typically be made by the operator in a trial and error manner, by the operator running printed test pages, iteratively making skew adjustments, and inspecting the printed output to select the desired skew adjustment. As described above, in this embodiment of the invention, the timing of the deactivation of motors 52 is adjusted in response to the selected skew adjustment, providing a fine tuning of the skew adjustment. In this manner, the operator of printing machine 10 can thus tune out even extremely small skew error, providing a highly precise printed output.
Referring back to
In the alternative to skew adjustment being effected by differential delay of the deactivation of motors 52, skew adjustment may also be effected as stepper motors 52a, 52b are activated. In this approach, the timing of the activation of motors 52a, 52b is differentially adjusted in response to the desired skew adjustment entered by the operator. This skew adjustment on activation may be applied either in combination with, or alternatively instead of, the skew adjustment at deactivation described above relative to
Further in the alternative, it is contemplated that the skew adjustment can be effected by differentially controlling the angular velocity with which each of the urging rollers advances the media sheet. As described in the above-incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 5,078,384 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,094,442, some printing machines effect registration of the media by controlling the velocity of the motors that drive the urging rollers in the registration station, with differential velocities effecting a rotation of the media. In this further alternative implementation, LCU 24 computes a difference in the differential velocity of the registration motors according to the user skew adjustment input. The motors are thus controlled accordingly, finely tuning the rotation of the media. While this approach involves a more complicated calculation, it is contemplated to be well within the capability of modern electronic logic circuitry.
Still further in the alternative, it is contemplated that this invention may be applied at various locations within the printing machine. For example, it is contemplated that a downstream registration function may also be implemented at the transfer station, for example to finely adjust the registration of the media after the registration station has transferred the media to the transfer station; it is contemplated that this invention may be implemented at such a downstream location as well. It is also contemplated that the transfer station and registration station can be mechanically combined into the same station, in which this invention may also be implemented. It is contemplated that these and other alternative implementations of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art having reference to this specification.
In each case, this invention provides the important advantage of allowing the operator of the printing machine to make precise adjustments in the skew of media printed by the printing machine. This eliminates the need for a service technician to effect this adjustment, saving cost and downtime, while providing improved precision in the positioning of printed images by the printing machine. This invention thus extends the precision of conventional printing machines, without further constricting the manufacturing tolerances of the equipment components.
While the present invention has been described according to its preferred embodiments, it is of course contemplated that modifications of, and alternatives to, these embodiments, such modifications and alternatives obtaining the advantages and benefits of this invention, will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having reference to this specification and its drawings. It is contemplated that such modifications and alternatives are within the scope of this invention as subsequently claimed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4971304 | Lofthus | Nov 1990 | A |
5078384 | Moore | Jan 1992 | A |
5094442 | Kamprath et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5169140 | Wenthe, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5322273 | Rapkin et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5555084 | Vetromile et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6997455 | Romine | Feb 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050019076 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60485844 | Jul 2003 | US |