1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to syndicated personalized start page(s) or content document(s) of a user group.
2. Related Art
A content document, such as a start page, can include a browser-based home page that can be accessed at an organization's domain (e.g., Web page) by a user using a workstation connected to a network such as the Internet, for example. A content document can be maintained by the content document provider or a group who has syndicated use of a content document, for example, and the content document can be customizable for a particular user or user group. For instance, groups, such as companies, universities, clubs, and organizations, can provide one or more content documents for their employees, customers, students, and/or members that focus on that group's particular interests. As an example, a company that sells computer equipment, such as personal or laptop computers, can integrate a default content document on their domain that appears upon connection to the Internet and that provides helpful tools, services, discussion boards, etc., that relate to a customer's purchased computer and/or interests.
Companies, such as Google Inc., frequently partner with such organizations and provide an appropriate syndicated default content document for a particular organization. The default content document may allow for some further customization at a group level (e.g., by an authorized representative of the group, such as an administrator), and may even allow some customization at a user level (e.g., adding modules or gadgets to the content document from a gadget directory). Some of this group-level or user-level customization can be conducted solely by the administrator or the user, without having to contact the content document provider. However, some items or tools that appear on a content document, or that are made available to appear on a content document, may only be customizable by contacting the content document provider.
Controlling the configuration of gadgets or modules (software tools or programs that are usually Uniform Resource Locater (URL)-based or Web-based) that can appear on, or that can be made available in, a content document is a task that is typically done through a group's (more specifically, a group's authorized administrator's) contact with the content document provider. An entire universe of modules, developed and submitted by both organizations and individuals, exists (and is growing), and these modules are, for the most part, available to anyone with access to the Internet. However, only a small number of modules are typically made available on default content documents. A user of a content document is then limited to this small number of available modules. In order for a group to customize (e.g., add to, delete from) the list of available modules, an administrator of the group may have to contact the content document provider (e.g., Google Inc.), and the content document provider would then make the updates in one or more files, for example, associated with that group's content document. This change would not be instantaneous and could take days to take effect.
Therefore, what is needed is a system and method that overcomes the above-described limitation(s).
The present invention relates to the self-administrating of a group's syndicated content document customization. In an embodiment of the invention, a method of facilitating the self-administration of a directory of available modules on a group's syndicated customizable content document. The method includes presenting an initial list of modules to an administrator of a group, enabling the administrator to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for inclusion or exclusion of one or more modules in a directory, and storing the module selection information identified by the administrator. Accordingly, when a user of the group accesses a customized content document, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules based on the module selection information.
In an embodiment, a system to facilitate the self-administration of a directory of available modules on a group's syndicated customizable content document includes a content document editor. The content document editor presents an initial list of modules to an administrator of a group and enables the administrator to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for inclusion or exclusion of one or more modules in a directory. The system also includes a memory that stores the module selection information identified by the administrator. Accordingly, when a user of the group accesses a customized content document, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules based on the module selection information.
In a further embodiment, a method of self-administrating a directory of available modules on a group's syndicated customizable content document includes accessing a content document editor, reviewing an initial list of modules available to a particular group, modifying module selection information based on interests of the particular group, and submitting the modified module selection information. Accordingly, when a user of the group accesses a customized content document, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules based on the module selection information.
In further method or system embodiments, an administrator can be enabled to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for exclusion of one or more modules in a directory. Accordingly, when a user of the group accesses a customized content document, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules that excludes modules identified for exclusion.
In still further method or system embodiments, an administrator can be enabled to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for inclusion of one or more modules in a directory. Accordingly, when a user of the group accesses a customized content document, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules that includes only modules identified for inclusion.
In another embodiment of the invention, a system to facilitate the self-administration of a directory of available modules on a group's syndicated customizable content document includes a server maintained by a content document provider that has a content document editor. The system also includes a workstation, maintained by a user group and connected to the server via a network, that allows an administrator of the user group to access the content document editor. The content document editor presents an initial list of modules and enables the administrator to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for inclusion or exclusion of one or more modules in a directory. The system also includes a memory, maintained by the content document provider or the user group, to store the module selection information identified by the administrator. When a user of the user group accesses a content document customized in accordance with this system, the user is presented with a modified list of available modules based on the module selection information.
Advantages of the present invention include allowing partnered user groups the freedom to choose modules on their own from a wider selection without having to contact the content document provider. Additionally, a partnered user group can dynamically control what modules may appear or may not appear on their associated content document(s).
Further embodiments, features, and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of the various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers may indicate identical or functionally similar elements. The drawing in which an element first appears is generally indicated by the left-most digit in the corresponding reference number.
While the present invention is described herein with reference to illustrative embodiments for particular applications, it should be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. Those skilled in the art with access to the teachings provided herein will recognize additional modifications, applications, and embodiments within the scope thereof and additional fields in which the invention would be of significant utility.
It is noted that references in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it would be within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to incorporate such a feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
Overview
The present invention relates to the self-administrating of a group's syndicated content document customization. It specifically relates to dynamically effective self-configuration of a gadget or module directory by an administrator of a partnered user group. The present invention is described with respect to a World Wide Web environment operating on one or more networks, such as the Internet. Such an environment is illustrative and not intended to limit the present invention.
The embodiments described herein illustrate systems and methods that allow an administrator of a particular partnered user group to self-configure the directory of modules available to users of the group on that group's content document or start page. The administrator can allow access to all available modules universally available, or can restrict the modules available on the content document in a number of ways described herein. The changes in the module directory submitted directly by the administrator take effect immediately. Therefore, there is no administrative delay that would typically occur if changes had to be made via a request to a content document provider.
A more specific example of this can be described as follows. An Internet Service Provider (ISP) wishes to offer a personalized start page to its users. The personalized start page would be equivalent to the content document, and the ISP would be equivalent to the partnered user group, as these terms are used in this document. The personal start page can be customizable by the users in the sense that users can add their own chosen gadgets (or modules) to the start page from a designated gadget (or module) directory. The ISP (or more specifically, an administrator of the ISP) can configure the gadget directory by restricting certain gadgets from a global gadget list (also known as blacklisting) or by specifying a distinct set of gadgets that will appear (also known as whitelisting). Blacklisting gadgets will allow the ISP to block competitive gadgets or gadgets that do not adhere to the ISP's policies. Whitelisting gadgets will allow the ISP to fully control which gadgets are discoverable by users. Furthermore, the ISP can highlight gadgets of relevance to their users by designating a custom gadget category in the directory that users will see when they add content to their start pages. This custom category can include gadgets that the ISP has created, or can simply include any gadgets that the ISP recommends to its users.
The following invention description facilitates the above example. The description is broken down into a system architecture, process embodiments, and example implementation(s).
System Architecture
System 100 also includes one or more workstations 108/112, each maintained by a partnered user group, for example, that is connected to network 106. Although two workstations 108/112 are shown (one for an administrator of a first partnered user group (Group 1) and one for an administrator of a second partnered user group (Group 2), the invention is not to be limited to two. Any number of these workstations can exist in the system, for any number of groups, as would be understood by those skilled in the relevant art(s).
An administrator of a partnered user group can use workstation 108/112 to access content document editor 104 via network 106. For authorization purposes, an authorized administrator may log into server 102 using a user name and password, for example. Once logged in, the authorized administrator can access content document editor 104 to customize one or more of that group's syndicated content documents, including the configuration of one or more module or gadget directories. Workstation 108/112 can include storage 120/122 (e.g., memory) to store data that may be associated with the customization of the corresponding groups' content document(s).
Content documents (and any associated data, including customization data) are typically stored on server 102 (in storage 118, for example). However, a content document (and/or its associated data) can be stored at a location maintained by its associated group, such as storage 120/122, or elsewhere.
Users 110/114/116 of a partnered user group can access their associated group's content document(s) via network 106. For example, a Group 1 user 110 may enter the URL of the content document in an Internet browser on a personal computing device, to include, but not be limited to a personal computer, laptop, personal digital assistant (PDA), mobile telephone, or the like. Alternatively, user 110 may be connecting a purchased product (such as any of the personal computing devices just mentioned, for example) to the Internet for the first time. In this situation, a default content document for Group 1 may be automatically accessed in an Internet browser. The first time user 110 accesses Group 1's content document, it will appear in a default form, as set up by the content document provider, or alternatively in a customized default form as may have been already customized by an authorized administrator. User 110 may be able to further customize the content document to his or her liking, within limits as designated within the content document.
A partnered user group, such as Group 1, typically has one content document that it makes available to its users, such as users 110. However, it is possible for a partnered user group to have more than one content document. For example, a partnered user group may have a content document for its customers or members, and another content document for its employees. As another example, a partnered user group may have differing levels of members. For instance, a company may have differing levels of customers, such as an occasional customer, a frequent customer, and a VIP customer. The content document accessed by each type of customer can be tailored for that particular type of customer. Using
In a related example, both users 114 and 116 may first be presented with a default content document, but once each identifies him or herself (e.g., via a user name and password or by indicating that he or she does not have an account), each may be presented with a different content document customized for his or her particular status.
In yet another related example, both users 114 and 116 may be presented with a common basic content document. However, the customization of that content document may be different based on each user's particular status. It is also possible for a single user to have multiple statuses apply, which can also affect how a content document is customized for that particular user. This could be, for example, based on the combination of surveyed interests for a particular user.
The examples described in the previous paragraphs are to show that a partnered user group is not limited to a single content document. A partnered user group can have, for example, more than one content document, each based on member type or user status, or a single content document that is customized based on user status. The content available on a content document, including the configuration of one or more gadget or module directories, can be customized by an authorized administrator, which can be based on member type or user status, for example, as will be discussed in more detail further below.
A more detailed description of the system architecture, including a more detailed description of a content document, or start page, can be found in co-pending U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 60/835,861, filed Aug. 7, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Process Embodiments
Method 200 begins at step 202. In step 202, an initial list of modules (or gadgets) is presented to an administrator of a group. This initial list can be a global list of all available modules, for example. Alternatively, the initial list can be presented based on a search of modules conducted by the administrator. As another alternative, the initial list can be presented based on a category chosen by the administrator. Accordingly, the initial list may be an unbounded (universal or global) list of available modules, or the initial list may be a bounded list of available modules. As another alternative, the initial list may also include categories, with each category representing a subset of modules.
In step 204, the administrator is enabled to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for the inclusion or exclusion of one or more modules. For example, corresponding to each listed module (or category) may be a toggle button, a checkbox, a radio button, or the like, that can be used by the administrator to indicate inclusion or exclusion. In addition, a means for submission of the module selection information can be available to the administrator. For example, a submit button or instructions for submitting the module selection information (e.g., instructions to press a certain key on a keyboard (such as “Enter”) when complete).
In optional step 206, the administrator is enabled to create a custom category. The contents of the custom category can be determined by the module selection information identified in step 204. A custom category can allow the administrator to highlight modules of relevance to the users. This custom category may include modules that are authored by the group (i.e., the organization that the group represents) or any modules that the group recommends to its users.
In step 208, the module selection information identified by the administrator is stored. It can be stored in storage 118 (e.g., a memory), or another storage area that is maintained by the content document provider, for example. Or alternatively, it can be stored in storage 120 or 122, maintained by a partnered user group.
Step 208 can include storing module indicators (such as URLs, module names, or other module identifiers, for example) that represent modules selected for exclusion. These can be stored in an exclusion list, for example, which can be considered as a blacklist. When a user accesses a group's content document, the user is presented with a list of available modules excluding modules listed in the exclusion list. The purpose of this is to allow a user to have any module available to him or her (as defined by the group), except those listed on the exclusion list. As an example, if Group 1 represents Computer Company A, then a Group 1 administrator may add modules having to do with competitor Computer Company B to the exclusion list so that they are not available to users of Group 1 upon accessing an associated content document.
It is also possible to have multiple exclusion lists stored for a particular group. For example, in the case where a group has users of differing status, a different exclusion list may be used for each status of user. As another example, a group may have users who each are of multiple statuses (e.g., based on a survey of the users' particular interests). In this example, multiple exclusion lists may apply to a single user based on one or more of the user's chosen interests. (For example, a user A who is interested in riding Brand X motorcycles in Europe may have two exclusion lists apply to him or her that exclude modules that have to do with other brands of motorcycles and that exclude modules that have to do with other countries. Whereas, a user B who is interested in riding Brand X motorcycles anywhere, may have just the exclusion list apply to him or her that only excludes modules that have to do with other brands of motorcycles.)
Step 208 can include storing module indicators (such as URLs, module names, or other module identifiers, for example) that represent modules selected for inclusion. These can be stored in an inclusion list, for example, which can be considered as a whitelist. When a user accesses a group's content document, the user is presented with a list of available modules including only modules listed in the inclusion list. The purpose of this is to limit the modules available to a user on a content document to only those that are in the inclusion list. As an example, a group may want to limit modules to only those relevant to a specific country, language, origin, operating system, product, etc.
It is also possible to have multiple inclusion lists stored for a particular group. For example, in the case where a group has users of differing status, a different inclusion list may be used for each status of user. As another example, a group may have users who each are of multiple statuses (e.g., based on a survey of the users' particular interests, as discussed above). In this example, multiple inclusion lists may apply to a single user based on one or more of the user's chosen interests. However, a decision may have to be made by a particular group, or the group's administrator, whether to allow a combination of the inclusion lists apply to a particular user, or the intersection of the inclusion lists.
It may also be possible to have one or more inclusion lists and one or more exclusion lists apply to a user, depending on the user's status or statuses. For example, one or more inclusion lists may be applied to a user, as discussed above. However, one or more exclusion lists may then be applied. Whether a group uses one or more inclusion lists, one or more exclusion lists, or both, depends on the desires and/or needs of the group.
Method 200 ends after step 208. Once the module selection information is submitted and stored, the changes immediately take effect in an accessed content document. The administrator can re-access the content document editor and make further changes as the need arises.
Method 300 begins at step 302. In step 302, a content document editor is accessed. As discussed earlier, this may be accomplished by logging into server 102 with a user name and password, for example. In step 304, an initial list of modules available to a particular group is reviewed. In step 306, module selection information is modified based on interests of the particular group. In step 308, the modified module selection information is submitted. Method 300 then ends. Once the modified module selection information is submitted (and subsequently stored), a user accessing that group's content document is presented with a modified list of available modules based on the module selection information. As stated earlier, once the module selection information is submitted and stored, the changes immediately take effect in an accessed content document. The administrator can re-access the content document editor and make further changes as the need arises.
Method 400 begins at step 402. In step 402, an initial list of modules is presented to an administrator of a group. In step 404, the administrator is enabled to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for exclusion of one or more modules in a directory. In step 406, the module selection information identified by the administrator is stored. Method 400 then ends. Once the modified module selection information is stored, a user accessing that group's content document is presented with a modified list of available modules that excludes modules identified for exclusion.
Method 500 begins at step 502. In step 502, an initial list of modules is presented to an administrator of a group. In step 504, the administrator is enabled to identify module selection information that identifies criteria for inclusion of one or more modules in a directory. In step 506, the module selection information identified by the administrator is stored. Method 500 then ends. Once the modified module selection information is stored, a user accessing that group's content document is presented with a modified list of available modules that includes only modules identified for inclusion.
Example Implementation(s)
Window 640 can include various sections, including module search field 642, module category list 644, and module list 646. In one embodiment, an administrator for a group can enter search terms related to certain types of modules in module search field 642, hit search button (e.g., “Go” button) 643, and view a resulting list of matching modules in module list 646. Alternatively, the administrator can choose one or more categories in module category list 644 and view corresponding modules from those categories in module list 646. From module list 646, the administrator can choose one or more modules (for example Module 648 (MODULE A)) by using selection means 650 (SEL A). Selection means 650 can be any selection mechanism that can be used in a window such as window 640, such as a toggle button, a checkbox, a radio button, etc. When the administrator is ready to submit the selections, submit means 652 can be used to do so. Submit means 652 can include a submit button, a set of instructions (such as instructions to “Hit ENTER When Complete”), or the like. Screen shot 600 shows only one example of a window 640 that can be used to configure a module directory for a partnered user group. It would be understood by those skilled in the relevant art(s) that there are many other ways for window 640 to work, and that there are many other ways that window 640 can be configured to accomplish the same goal. For example, a window 640 can include two columns: a first column that lists all available modules, and a second column that lists those items chosen from the first column for inclusion or exclusion. When dealing with multiple user statuses, an even more involved window 640 can be used.
In the above examples, only one window 640 is used to configure a module directory. However, more than one window 640 can be used. For example, one or more windows 640 can be used to create one or more inclusion lists. Similarly, one or more windows 640 can be used to create one or more exclusion lists. In another alternative example, one window 640 can be used to create an inclusion list, and one or more windows 640 can be used to create exclusion lists for each type of user in the group. There are many possible ways that a content document editor can be used, as would be understood by those skilled in the relevant art(s) with knowledge of this disclosure. Examples of content document editor screens that can be used to carry out content document customization according to embodiments of the present invention are shown in
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been presented. The invention is not limited to these examples. These examples are presented herein for purposes of illustration, and not limitation. Alternatives (including equivalents, extensions, variations, deviations, etc., of those described herein) will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) based on the teachings contained herein. Such alternatives fall within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Further, the purpose of the foregoing Abstract is to enable the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally, and especially the scientists, engineers and practitioners in the art who are not familiar with patent or legal terms or phraseology, to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and essence of the technical disclosure of the application. The Abstract is not intended to be limiting as to the scope of the present invention in any way.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 60/835,861, filed Aug. 7, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5179657 | Dykstal et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5470233 | Fruchterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5537526 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5581686 | Koppolu et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613058 | Koppolu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5634019 | Koppolu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636346 | Saxe | Jun 1997 | A |
5640579 | Koppolu et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5754175 | Koppolu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5801701 | Koppolu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812862 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835919 | Stern et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845281 | Benson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5905492 | Straub et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910804 | Fortenbery et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918010 | Appleman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920854 | Kirsch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931901 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974398 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6009442 | Chen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044375 | Shmueli et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061659 | Murray | May 2000 | A |
6067570 | Kreynin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078866 | Buck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6134552 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6223163 | Van Luchene | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247009 | Shiiyama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269361 | Davis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285987 | Roth et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298348 | Eldering | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324519 | Eldering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327628 | Anuff et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336132 | Appleman et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6396515 | Hetherington et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397231 | Salisbury et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421675 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430688 | Kohl et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473800 | Jerger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6601057 | Underwood et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610105 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6677894 | Sheynblat et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677968 | Appelman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681371 | Devanbu | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691114 | Nakamura | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6813640 | Benson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826572 | Colace et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6912532 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6976210 | Silva et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7089248 | King et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103642 | Chen et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7167903 | Percival | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7234107 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7257604 | Wolfe | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7281060 | Hofmann et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290006 | Xie et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7376907 | Santoro et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395322 | Harvey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406510 | Feldman | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7441185 | Coulson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7490295 | Chaudhri et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512622 | Volk et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7542951 | Chakrabarti et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7653721 | Romanov et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7693863 | Martin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725530 | Sah et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730082 | Sah et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730109 | Rohrs et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8051385 | Yawitz et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8185819 | Sah et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185830 | Saha et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8281390 | Shah et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8291390 | Ilic et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8407250 | Saha et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010042064 | Davis et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047297 | Wen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051911 | Marks et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002509 | Wagorn et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002525 | Arai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005867 | Gvily | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010672 | Waelbroeck et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023158 | Polizzi et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026359 | Long et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031230 | Sweet et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038282 | Montgomery | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046104 | Kaddeche et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046245 | Hillar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020065878 | Paxhia et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077891 | Castle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087632 | Keskar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087667 | Andersen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091736 | Wall | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099605 | Weitzman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107913 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111898 | Numaoka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123988 | Dean et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143819 | Han et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152114 | Shumaker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152197 | Stocker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156812 | Krasnoiarov et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165773 | Natsuno et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184097 | Hijiri et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184343 | Ashcroft | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194062 | Linide | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198780 | Kawakami et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028896 | Swart et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037334 | Khoo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067497 | Pichon | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070167 | Holtz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081017 | Shenassa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083937 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117437 | Cook et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140316 | Lakritz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149618 | Sender et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163372 | Kolsy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030216963 | Ishiwaka et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227482 | Bach et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236729 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015397 | Barry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019523 | Barry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019610 | Burns | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024812 | Park et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044571 | Bronnimann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054577 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054589 | Nicholas et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059708 | Dean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059712 | Dean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068554 | Bales et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083202 | Mu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093327 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093620 | Lino et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100488 | Kasper | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119740 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133660 | Junghuber et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139049 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143499 | Dietsch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143843 | Khoo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150673 | Dobronsky | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153508 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167928 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183831 | Ritchy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205163 | Yagi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205554 | Goswami et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216034 | Lection et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249709 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021765 | Flores et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050021 | Timmons | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065806 | Harik | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071224 | Fikes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080898 | Block | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085272 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096979 | Koningstein | May 2005 | A1 |
20050097180 | Abdelhak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101311 | Weitzman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120288 | Boehme et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131758 | Desikan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131762 | Bharat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138640 | Fresko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144069 | Wiseman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160356 | Albornoz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050183026 | Amano et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198120 | Reshef et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198615 | Choi et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216335 | Fikes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222900 | Fuloria et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222903 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222989 | Haveliwala et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223002 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015817 | Fioretti et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041548 | Parsons et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048068 | Danninger | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074913 | O'Sullivan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117016 | Smith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123230 | Hewett et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129935 | Deinlein et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173985 | Moore | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218133 | Atkin et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259860 | Kobashi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006069 | Smith et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016867 | Nickell et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055748 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083670 | Kelley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101285 | Mohr | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106803 | Peterson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136201 | Sah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136320 | Sah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136337 | Sah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136443 | Sah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162842 | Ambachtsheer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162845 | Cave et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192700 | Sengar | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204010 | Sah et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070288488 | Rohrs et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010345 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010387 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022133 | Sobel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033956 | Saha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034309 | Louch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034441 | Saha et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082907 | Sorotokin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090006996 | Saha et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037935 | Saha et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090204914 | King et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090288025 | King et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20120221942 | Sah et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222128 | Saha et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130018997 | Saha et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 026 610 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1415245 | Feb 2011 | EP |
0038074 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0075840 | Dec 2000 | WO |
2004042525 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abdelnur, Alejandro et al., Java Portlet Specification, version 1.0, JCP Program Management Office, Oct. 7, 2003, pp. 1-132, XP002631612, retrieved from the internet at http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsrl168/index.html on Apr. 6, 2011, 123 pages. |
Braun, Chris et al., “Web Services for Remote Portlets Specification Version 1.0”, The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), Sep. 3, 2003, XP002631614, retrieved from the internet at http://www.oasis-2000304-wsrp-spedification-1.0.pdf on Apr. 6, 2011, 86 pages. |
Parkin, Stephanie, “Rapid Java and J2EE Development with IBM WebSphere Studio and IBM Rational Developer”, IBM Software Group, Oct. 2004, XP002631615, retrieved from the internet at http://s7.compdfs/wp-radrwd-medres.pdf on Apr. 6, 2011, 44 pages. |
HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Note 6 Nov. 2000, retrieved from the internet at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/ on Oct. 19, 2011, 53 pages. |
Start, “Start.com Developer Center: Updates and Events”, retrieved from the internet at <http://start.com/developer/default.htm, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 2 pgs. |
Start, “Start.com Developer Center: Getting Started with Start.com Gadgets”, retrieved from the internet at <http://start.com/developer/gettingstarted.aspx, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 2 pgs. |
Start, “Start.com Developer Center: Atlas Runtime Reference”, retrieved from the internet at <http://start.com/developer/atlasruntime.aspx, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 6 pgs. |
Start, “Start.com Developer Center: Bindings Reference”, retrieved from the internet at <http://start.com/developer/binding—ref.aspx, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 11 pgs. |
Techcrunch, “Profile—MSN Start.com”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/Start.com/, dated Aug. 3, 2005 retrieved from the internet on May 10, 2006; 3 pgs. |
Richard Macmanus, “Microsoft's Start.com Opens Up”, retrieved from the internet at <http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=9, dated Sep. 14, 2005, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 4 pgs. |
Yahoo!, “Widgets—Information”, retrieved from the internet at <http://widgets.yahoo.com/info, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 2 pgs. |
Yahoo!, “Widgets—FAQ”, retrieved from the internet at <http://widgets.yahoo.com/faq/, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 4 pgs. |
Yahoo!, “Widgets—Basics”, retrieved from the internet at <http:widgets.yahoo.com/basics/, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 4 pgs. |
Yahoo!, “Widgets—Version History”, retrieved from the internet at <http://widgets.yahoo.com/versionhistory/, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 11 pgs. |
Yahoo!, “Konfabulator—Gallery”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.widgetgallery.com, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 3 pgs. |
Michael Arrington, “Profile—Konfabulator/ Yahoo Widgets”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/Konfabulator/, dated Jul. 26, 2005, retrieved from the internet on May 10, 2006; 6 pgs. |
Apple, “Dashboard: Handy Widgets at your Command”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/dashboard/, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 4 pgs. |
Apple, “Featured Widget: Art Directors Toolkit Widget”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/, dated May 17, 2006, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 3 pgs. |
Apple Computer, Inc., “Tiger Developer Overview Series: Developing Dashboard Widgets”, retrieved from the internet at <http://developer.apple.com/macosx/dashboard.html, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 11 pgs. |
Dashboard Exposed, “Newest Widgets”, retrieved from the internet at <http:www.dashboardexposed.com/index/sitelinks-newest-action, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 5 pgs. |
Bryan Castle, “Introduction to Web Services for Remote Portlets”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www-128.ibm.com,developerworks/library/ws-wsrp/, dated Apr. 15, 2005, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 8 pgs. |
Sun Microsystems, Inc., “Introduction to JSR 168—The Portlet Specification”, retrieved from the internet at<http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/portalserver/reference/techart/jsr168/, dated Jul. 17, 2003, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 3 pgs. |
Ron Lynn, et al., “Creating a JSR 168 Portlet for Use by Diverse Portals using Web Services for Remote Portlets”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/tutorials/0510—lynn/0510—1yn . . . , dated Oct. 26, 2005, retrieved from the internet on May 10, 2006; 2 pgs. |
“JSR 168, WSRP, Portlets & Enterprise Portal”, retrieved from the internet at <http://portlets.blogspot.com/, dated May 17, 2006, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 18 pgs. |
Daniel Rubio, “Web Services, portlets and WSRP”, retrieved from the internet at <http://searchwebservices.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid26—gci1134722,00.html, dated Oct. 18, 2005, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 6 pgs. |
Apple, “Exposé: Find the window you need. Now.”, retrieved from the internet at <http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/expose/, retrieved from the internet on May 23, 2006; 2 pgs. |
Google Introduces New Pricing for Popular Self-Service Online Advertising Program, http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/select.html, p. 1-2, dated Feb. 20, 2002, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 2 pgs. |
Julio Ojeda-Zapata. “Wild about widgets: Tiny computer programs are ‘where the Web and the desktop meet.’” Knight Ridder Tribune News Service. Aug. 24, 2005. ProQuest Newsstand, ProQuest Web. Sep. 13, 2009, 3 pages. |
Datta et al., “Accelerating dynamic Web content generation,” Sep.-Oct. 2002, IEEE, 6:27-36. |
Geigel et al., “Using genetic algorithms for album page layouts,” Oct.-Dec. 2003, IEEE, 10:16-27. |
Krieger et al, “The Emergence of Distributed Component Platforms,” Mar. 1998, IEEE, 43-53. |
Schaeck, “Web Services for Remote Portals (WSRP) Whitepaper,” Sep. 22, 2002, 1-18. |
Collection of pages from www.overture.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 4 pgs. |
Collection of pages from findwhat.com, http://www.findwhat.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 50 pgs. |
Collection of pages from Sprinks com, http://www.sprinks.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 11 pgs. |
Collection of pages from Kandoodle.com, http://www.kanoodle.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 5 pgs. |
Collection of pages from Google Advertising, http://www.google.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003; 80 pgs. |
Chris Sherman, “Google Launches AdWords Select,” Feb. 20, 2002, 6 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (6 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 06/46976 mailed Mar. 13, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (4 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 06/46974 mailed Mar. 13, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (5 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 06/46975 mailed Mar. 13, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (5 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 06/46973 mailed Mar. 13, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (3 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 07/10788 mailed Jul. 23, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, or the Declaration (3 pages); Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (3 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US 07/13261 mailed Jul. 7, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration (4 pages), Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (3 pages), and International Search Report (2 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US07/17502 mailed Jul. 17, 2008. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration (1 page), International Search Report (3 pages), and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (8 pages) for International Application No. PCT/US07/17503 mailed Sep. 16, 2008 (Total 12 Pages). |
Examiner's First Report on Patent Application dated Jul. 23, 2008; (2 pages); and Correspondence from Australian Patent Office regarding withdrawal of Examination Report dated Jul. 23, 2008 (1 page); all issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2006326623 (3 pages total). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60835861 | Aug 2006 | US |