Adsorbent filter media for removal of biological contaminants in process liquids

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8403153
  • Patent Number
    8,403,153
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 5, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Adsorbent filter media particularly suited for removal of biological contaminants in process liquids. A porous fixed bed of adsorbent material is formed, using only a granular adsorbent and a water-insoluble thermoplastic binder. The resulting composite filter allows for a higher amount of adsorbent with smaller adsorbent particles than conventional depth filters. Elimination of cellulose fiber, as well as the elimination of the thermoset binder, results in reduced contamination of the process liquid.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Cellulosic depth filters, such as Millistak®+ filters commercially available from Millipore Corporation, are typically used in the production of biopharmaceuticals, as derived from mammalian cell culture for the purpose of clarifying various crude product fluids. These composite filters include a layer of tightly structured cellulosic depth media, and can be optimized to a specific application, such as retaining colloidal particles and cell debris or retaining whole cells and larger debris. They combine sequential grades of media in a single filter cartridge. These filters are most commonly used in polishing or secondary clarification processes to remove small quantities of suspended matter from aqueous product (protein) streams. The primary function of these filters is to protect or extend the service life of more expensive downstream separation processes, such as sterile filtration and affinity chromatography. That is, a common application for these filters is as “prefilters”, protecting downstream equipment and media from colloidal contaminants and other cell debris. In addition, such depth filters are also used for the protection of viral clearance filters by removing trace quantities of agglomerated proteins.


It is also known in the industry that composite depth filters also can retain, to varying degrees, some soluble contaminants commonly found in mammalian cell cultures, such as nucleic acids, host cell proteins, lipids, surfactants, etc. This retention capability for certain soluble contaminants is based on the adsorptive properties of the depth filter media.


The filter media typically employed in these depth filters includes refined cellulose fibers (wood pulp and/or cotton derived), diatomaceous earth, and a water-soluble thermoset resin binder. The diatomaceous earth (a natural form of silica containing trace amounts of various silicates) in these composites is typically 40-60% by weight, and is believed to be the essential component, adsorbing colloidal size biological matter such as cell fragments, organelles and agglomerated proteins, as well as various soluble biochemicals such as proteins, lipids and nucleic acids.


However, one of the principal drawbacks of the use of these cellulosic depth filters for the production of parenteral drugs and other pharmaceuticals is the relatively high level of water-soluble contaminants they release into the system. Indeed, extensive pre-flushing is required to reduce the level of these organic and inorganic contaminants to acceptable levels prior to use. Furthermore, the maximum loading of diatomaceous earth adsorbent within the depth filter media is limited to about 60% by weight, and the minimum particle size for the adsorbent to be retained in the fiber matrix is about 10 microns.


It is therefore an object of the present invention to reduce or eliminate the release of contaminants from adsorbent filters.


It is another object of the present invention to increase the content or loading of adsorbent in filter media.


It is a further object of the present invention to provide a filter, with smaller adsorbent particles in order to maximize the available surface area for adsorption.


Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The problems of the prior art have been overcome by the present invention, which provides adsorbent filter media particularly suited for removal of biological contaminants in process liquids. A porous fixed bed of adsorbent material is formed, using only a granular adsorbent and a water-insoluble thermoplastic binder. The resulting composite filter allows for a higher amount of adsorbent with smaller adsorbent particles than conventional depth filters. Elimination of cellulose fiber, as well as the elimination of the water-soluble thermoset binder, results in reduced contamination of the process liquid. As a result, extensive pre-flushing is no longer required to reduce extraneous contaminants. Improved media performance is obtained by increasing the content of the adsorbent material, and/or by using smaller adsorbent media to maximize the available surface area for adsorption.


The resulting composite filter material is substantially or completely devoid of cellulose and thermoset binder, and can be placed in a clarifying system downstream of a bioreactor and upstream of a sterile filter. Other applications include pretreatment of cell culture fluids prior to viral clearance filtration as well as chromatographic separations.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph comparing water permeability of composites of the present invention with conventional composites;



FIG. 2 is a graph of pre-filter differential pressure versus throughput;



FIG. 3 is a graph of sterile filter differential pressure versus throughput; and



FIG. 4 is a chart of conductivity values of effluent passing through various media.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The filter media of the present invention includes an adsorbent material and a water-insoluble thermoplastic binder. This combination can be used to form a porous, fixed bed of adsorbent material with suitable mechanical properties for the application, including permeability, tensile strength and bending strength. The filter media is particularly useful as a depth filter.


Suitable adsorbent materials include diatomaceous earth, silica, porous glass, zeolites, and activated carbon. Diatomaceous earth is particularly preferred. Additionally, chromatography media, of any variety of forms (beads, ground powder, etc.) and surface chemistries (ion exchange, hydrophobic, etc.), can be used as adsorbents in such porous media. Suitable binders include thermoplastic binders such as polyolefins, preferably polyethylene, polypropylene or mixtures thereof. The binder is preferably used in bead, powder or fiber form. By proper choice of the binder (in terms of a sufficiently high melting or softening point), the media can be autoclaved or otherwise steam sterilized or gamma irradiated to help reduce or eliminate any biological contaminants therein.


The media fabrication process can depend on the binder form used. The media can be prepared by blending the binder with the adsorbent material, followed by fusing the adsorbent particles together such as by partially melting or softening the binder. For example, polyethylene powder can be blended dry (such as by shaking/tumbling for several minutes) with the adsorbent particles, such as diatomaceous earth or silica beads, in proportions from about 1:1 to about 1:3 binder:adsorbent, by weight. The resulting blended material can be placed in a mold and heated (e.g., in a heated hydraulic press) to a suitable temperature to fuse the adsorbent particles, such as 130° C. to 160° C. Diatomaceous earth and silica beads bound into 2-4 mm thick pads using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene powder (Mipelonm™), commercially available from Mitsui Chemical, have been formed by this method, with an average bead diameter of 20-30 microns. As the material heats and softens in the press, the compressive force should be periodically adjusted to maintain a constant force during the heat cycle (about 5 to 10 minutes).


Alternatively, a wet-laid process can be used to form the media, particularly where the binder is in the form of fibers. For example, fine polyethylene fibers (Fybrel™, from Mitsui Chemical) can be dispersed in isopropanol and water, then blended into a slurry with diatomaceous earth powder in proportions of from about 1:1 to about 1:3 binder:adsorbent, by weight. The slurry is transferred to a Buchner funnel holding a nominal 1 micron nonwoven support material in its base to prevent the fibers and adsorbent from passing straight through the perforations of the funnel. The bulk of the liquid is then drawn off through a vacuum flask. The formed disk is transferred to an oven for drying and thermally bonding the adsorbent particles together by partially melting or softening the polyethylene fibers.


Composite materials constructed as above exhibit very high permeability (high porosity) and low particle retention properties relative to the conventional cellulosic depth filter media conventionally available. Gravity settling of diatomaceous earth particles with polyethylene fiber or powder produces a low-density composite structure with relatively large void spaces.


To enhance the separation properties of the diatomaceous earth composite materials of the present invention, the material should be compacted or compressed prior to and/or during heating. For example, compressing the filter media samples for about 30 seconds using a pneumatic press in the range of 100-325 psi was found to be effective. The media samples do not relax substantially after compression; after heating to fuse the structure into a monolith, the media maintains its compressed thickness dimension. The composite can be compressed to about 50-70% of its original volume depending on composition and compression force.


The application of mechanical compression to the composite materials also can be used to regulate water permeability, which can approach that of standard cellulosic depth filter pads. FIG. 1 illustrates water permeability measurements (flow rate relative to pressure differential) of composites made from Celpure™ (Advanced Minerals) diatomaceous earth and Fybrel™ (Mitsui Chemical) polyethylene microfibers, compared to conventional Millistak®+ A1HC depth filter samples. The figure shows that the water permeabilities of the instant composites are of a range consistent with that of the commercial cellulosic depth filter media.


A third granular or fibrous component may be added to the adsorbent/binder mixture as a means of manipulating the permeability of the product to allow for more effective use of the contained adsorbent. The additive may be a functional adsorbent or inert material but must be of a size and quantity to measurably affect the permeability of the media. Test results have shown that affecting media permeability in this manner does not substantially compromise (reduce) the adsorbent capacity of the media. Creating selectively larger flow channels within the media allows for deeper/broader penetration of the process fluid within the porous matrix that can compensate effectively for the overall lower adsorbent content of the media.


In addition to particle capture, the adsorbent porous monoliths of the present invention have significant advantages over conventional cellulosic adsorbent depth filters, particularly with regard to water extractibles. Any extractible materials are a serious concern in the production of parenteral pharmaceuticals. The conventional cellulosic depth media is known to have a relatively high extractible loading that requires extensive flushing prior to use. The present inventors have demonstrated that the extractibles that contribute to conductivity (inorganics) do not solely or predominantly derive from the diatomaceous earth. Indeed, the composite materials of the present invention, devoid of cellulose and thermoset binder, result in a reduction in effluent conductivity of 75-90% compared to conventional cellulosic media. The elimination of cellulose and substitution of the thermoset water-soluble resin binder with a water-insoluble binder such as polyethylene result in DE-based media having a drastically lower amount of inorganic extractibles. For users of such materials, there is a considerable benefit in reducing flushing requirements with lower risk of product contamination.


In general terms, one preferred method for preparing a preferred composite filter materials of the present invention is as follows. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene powder, with an average particle size of 25 μm, and natural diatomite having a particle size range of 0.2-25 μm, are dry mixed, batchwise, in a rotary V-blender that includes an internal high-speed agitator. The mixture is transferred from the blender to a powder dispenser (or applicator). The applicator dispenses the mixed powders onto a moving web of porous non-woven polyester material at room temperature at a controlled thickness of up to 0.5 inch. Multiple applications of different powder mixtures could be applied in similar fashion to create a gradient composition adsorbent media.


The loose mixed powder layer is then lightly compacted and leveled by contact with an overhead roller before being heated from below by electrically-heated plates and simultaneously from above by IR lamps to soften the polyethylene powder. The temperature of the heated plates escalates along the production path to a final temperature of approximately 340° F. The temperature of the powder mixture is held at a maximum of around 340° F. for several minutes before applying an additional non-woven polyether web on top.


The composite material is then continuously compressed at approximately 100 psi to a thickness of 0.10-0.20″ by passing through two heated calender rollers also set to a temperature of around 340° F. The finished material is then allowed to cool on a metal plate open to the air.


EXAMPLE 1

Samples of various blends of diatomaceous earth and polyethylene microfibers fused into pads of approximately 2-4 mm in thickness were tested in a standard clarification process step related to protein product recovery from mammalian cell cultures. The test was to challenge the adsorbent media with a suspension of E. coli lysate (in buffer) under constant flow conditions while monitoring the pressure rise on the media sample (rate of plugging) as well as the quality of the effluent relative to the volume of fluid processed. Effluent or filtrate quality was measured by directly filtering the fluid through a 0.2 micron sterilizing grade membrane filter, in this case Durapore® GV. These experimental composite samples were again compared to Millistak®+ cellulosic depth filter media.



FIGS. 2 and 3 show the pressure profiles for the adsorbent media samples and Millistak®+ pads and the associated sterile filter profiles. Throughput is reported as the volume of fluid processed relative to the volume of the depth filter media employed (bed volume).


As shown in the figures, the DE/PE fiber composites were capable of matching the tightest or most retentive grade of Millistak®+ DE media (75 grade) in both throughput and retention. The various composite samples have rates of rise in pressure that lie at or below that of the 75DE Millistak®+ media. In addition, the rates or pressure rise on the downstream sterile filters are all nearly equivalent for the composites of the invention as compared to 75DE Millistak®+ media, indicating a comparable level of particle retention.


EXAMPLE 2

Samples of diatomaceous earth fused into a fixed-bed pad using polyethylene powder (Mipelon™, Mitsui Chemical) were tested for their capacity to protect a viral retentive membrane, NFP Viresolve 180. In this test, the DE/PE composite (approximately 3 mm thick) was challenged with a solution of polyclonal human IgG protein at a concentration of 0.5 gm/L. The Viresolve membrane typically yields a capacity of approximately 150 L/m2 for this feedstock. Using the Millistak®+ A1HC depth filter to pre-treat this feedstock for the removal of protein agglomerates, the Viresolve membrane capacity can be increased to the range of 750-1500 L/m2. Two samples of diatomaceous earth (Celpure 25 and Celpure 300 (Advanced Minerals)) were blended with the Mipelon PE powder and formed into 2-3 mm pads after heating (without compression). The DE/PE composite samples were then used to pre-treat the IgG feedstock and the filtrate was again processed through Viresolve 180 to determine the effect on membrane capacity.


The Celpure 25 (a fine grade DE) yielded a Viresolve capacity of 440 L/m2 and the Celpure 300 (a larger coarse grain DE) yielded a Viresolve capacity of >1000 L/m2. These tests indicate that a monolith of diatomaceous earth formed with a PE powder binder can provide the same level of protection for a viral retentive membrane (by the removal of protein agglomerates) as currently provided by cellulosic depth filters such as Millistak®+ depth filters.


EXAMPLE 3

To gauge the cleanliness of the composite materials of the invention, material samples were flushed with clean deionized water and the conductivity of the effluent, after a prescribed flush volume, was measured. Conductivity values were taken to represent the level of soluble metals present in the filter media. FIG. 4 shows the conductivity values obtained for various DE/PE composite samples relative to commercial Millistak®+ depth filter samples.


The Millistak®+ DE media is a composite of cellulose and diatomaceous earth plus a water-soluble thermoset resin binder. The CE media contains only cellulose fiber and binder. It is evident from these measurements that those extractibles that contribute to conductivity (inorganics) do not derive predominantly from the diatomaceous earth. Comparing these values to the DE/PE composites tested, there is reduction in effluent conductivity of 75-90%.


EXAMPLE 4

10-20% of 75-100 micron porous glass beads when added to a 2:1 mixture of powdered polyethylene (20-30 micron) and diatomite (0.5-10 micron) can reduce the hydraulic permeability of the finished media by 10-30% with no measurable loss in adsorbent capacity as measured by particle capture and process volume.

Claims
  • 1. A porous composite monolith for removing biological contaminants in process liquids comprising: a compressed heat fused composite porous monolith having an adsorbent chromatography media material, and a water-insoluble thermoplastic binder dry mixture compressed to about 50-70% of the original volume of the composite porous monolith prior to and/or during heat fusing together the adsorbent chromatography media material and the thermoplastic binder, the composite porous monolith being substantially devoid of cellulose and a thermoset binder,wherein the thermoplastic binder includes polyolefins, polyethylene, polypropylene, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, or mixtures thereof, andthe ratio of thermoplastic binder to adsorbent chromatography media material ratio is about 1:1 to about 1:3 by weight.
  • 2. The composite monolith of claim 1, wherein the adsorbent chromatography media material includes beads, powder, or particles, and the thermoplastic binder includes fibers, microfibers, beads or powder.
  • 3. The composite monolith of claim 1, further comprising porous glass beads.
  • 4. The composite monolith of claim 1, wherein the thermoplastic binder comprises ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.
  • 5. The composite monolith of claim 1, wherein the composite is formed by heating the adsorbent chromatography media material and the binder to a temperature at which the binder at least partially melts or softens to thermally bond the adsorbent chromatography media material together.
  • 6. The composite monolith of claim 3, wherein the adsorbent chromatography media material has a particle size range about 0.2 microns to about 25 microns, the binder comprises ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene powder having an average particle size about 25 microns, and the porous glass beads have an average bead diameter about 20 microns to 30 microns.
  • 7. The composite monolith of claim 1, having a thickness about 2 mm to about 4 mm.
  • 8. The composite monolith of claim 7, further comprising an adsorbent filter media.
  • 9. The composite monolith of claim 7, further comprising a pre-filter.
  • 10. A biopharmaceutical clarification system, comprising: a) a bioreactor;b) a sterile filter downstream of the bioreactor; andc) a composite filter media downstream of the bioreactor and upstream of the sterile filter, the composite filter media including a heat fused composite porous monolith having an adsorbent chromatography media material and a water-insoluble thermoplastic binder dry mixture compressed to about 50-70% of the original volume of the composite porous monolith prior to and/or during heat fusing together the adsorbent chromatography media material and the thermoplastic binder, the composite filter media being substantially devoid of cellulose and a thermoset binder, wherein the thermoplastic binder includes polyolefins, polyethylene, polypropylene, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, or mixtures thereof, andthe ratio of thermoplastic binder to adsorbent chromatography media material is about 1:1 to about 1:3 by weight.
  • 11. The biopharmaceutical clarification system of claim 10, further comprising an aqueous product stream feedstock from the bioreactor, pretreated through the composite filter media, the resulting filtrate being processed through the sterile filter.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/656,184 filed Jan. 22, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,673,757, which claims priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/774,773 filed Feb. 17, 2006, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (62)
Number Name Date Kind
3274103 Adams Sep 1966 A
3351495 Larson Nov 1967 A
3550508 Wartman, Jr. et al. Dec 1970 A
3645072 Clapham Feb 1972 A
3721072 Clapham Mar 1973 A
3862030 Goldberg Jan 1975 A
4061807 Shaler et al. Dec 1977 A
4187210 Howard, Jr. Feb 1980 A
4331622 Doi et al. May 1982 A
4344846 Klein Aug 1982 A
4664683 Degen et al. May 1987 A
4665050 Degen et al. May 1987 A
4687573 Miller et al. Aug 1987 A
4753728 VanderBilt et al. Jun 1988 A
4833172 Schwarz et al. May 1989 A
4859386 VanderBilt et al. Aug 1989 A
4877679 Leatherman et al. Oct 1989 A
4892779 Leatherman et al. Jan 1990 A
4968555 Landler Nov 1990 A
5019311 Koslow May 1991 A
5032450 Rechlicz et al. Jul 1991 A
5033465 Braun et al. Jul 1991 A
5078132 Braun et al. Jan 1992 A
5147722 Koslow Sep 1992 A
5196262 Schwarz et al. Mar 1993 A
5331037 Koslow Jul 1994 A
5332426 Tang et al. Jul 1994 A
5486410 Groeger et al. Jan 1996 A
5505892 Domme Apr 1996 A
5639550 Lisenko Jun 1997 A
5679248 Blaney Oct 1997 A
5776353 Palm et al. Jul 1998 A
5792513 Koslow et al. Aug 1998 A
5882517 Chen et al. Mar 1999 A
5928588 Chen et al. Jul 1999 A
5948557 Ondeck et al. Sep 1999 A
6114023 Schwarz et al. Sep 2000 A
6165519 Lehrer et al. Dec 2000 A
6227383 De Ruiter et al. May 2001 B1
6261497 Wong et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274041 Williamson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6321915 Wilson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6429165 Nastke et al. Aug 2002 B1
6468942 Sansalone Oct 2002 B1
6485546 Fuchs Nov 2002 B2
6524489 Palm et al. Feb 2003 B1
6565961 Koslow May 2003 B2
6630016 Koslow Oct 2003 B2
6632527 McDaniel et al. Oct 2003 B1
6712974 Palm et al. Mar 2004 B1
6770736 Haftka et al. Aug 2004 B1
6793866 Kelly et al. Sep 2004 B2
6835311 Koslow Dec 2004 B2
6861002 Hughes Mar 2005 B2
6959820 Koslow Nov 2005 B2
7144533 Koslow Dec 2006 B2
7673757 Yavorsky Mar 2010 B2
20020069761 Fuchs Jun 2002 A1
20040159605 Hughes Aug 2004 A1
20050145579 Drohmann et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050211635 Yeh et al. Sep 2005 A1
20120175805 Yavorsky Jul 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
1646678 Jul 2005 CN
37 19 233 Dec 1988 DE
0 172 003 Feb 1986 EP
0 517 189 Dec 1992 EP
2 390 987 Jan 2004 GB
5-345105 Dec 1993 JP
7-116513 May 1995 JP
7-124470 May 1995 JP
11-503972 Apr 1999 JP
2000-342917 Dec 2000 JP
2002-302857 Oct 2002 JP
2005-246260 Sep 2005 JP
2005-527349 Sep 2005 JP
9729829 Aug 1997 WO
9814265 Apr 1998 WO
9843796 Oct 1998 WO
0018810 Apr 2000 WO
01-87777 Nov 2001 WO
03084639 Oct 2003 WO
03097797 Nov 2003 WO
2005094966 Oct 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Singapore communication dated Sep. 16, 2010 in corresponding foreign application (SG200700656.2).
European communication dated Oct. 22, 2007.
European communication dated Nov. 18, 2008.
Analytical Advances; BioPharm May 2002; Charles Lambalot; “Strategies in Clarifying Mammalian Cultures” p. 74.
Recovery of Biological Products XI, Banff, Canada Sep. 14-19, 2003; Martin P. Smith et al.; “Selecting a Virus Reduction filter and Optimising Performance During Process Scale-Up”.
Prashad et al.; “Depth Filtration: Cell Clarification of Bioreactor Offloads”; Filtration and Separation, Croydon, GB vol. 43, No. 7, Sep. 2006.
The European Search Report dated May 18, 2007.
Chinese communication dated Oct. 24, 2008.
Indian communication dated Mar. 4, 2009.
Japanese communication dated Apr. 28, 2009.
Singapore communication dated Sep. 28, 2009.
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2009 and Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 22, 2010 in corresponding parent U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,184.
Japanese communication dated May 11, 2010 in co-pending foreign application (JP2007-038153).
European communication dated Mar. 30, 2010 in corresponding foreign application (EP07250624.9).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100159581 A1 Jun 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60774773 Feb 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11656184 Jan 2007 US
Child 12718336 US