A vital area of circuit performance is the propagation time of signals, for example synchronization or “clock” signals, across an integrated circuit. Longer wires in integrated circuits resist the propagation of signals due to the resistance and capacitance of the wire. The propagation of signals across a chip can be improved by inserting an amplification circuit, sometimes referred to as buffering or repeater insertion, into the wire.
Accordingly, a repeater circuit would be advantageous. Embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide an advanced repeater utilizing signal distribution delay.
An advanced repeater utilizing signal distribution delay is disclosed. In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, an advanced repeater circuit includes an output stage for driving an output signal line responsive to an input signal and a feedback loop coupled to the output signal line for changing state of the output stage subsequent to a delay after a transition of the output signal. The delay may be due to transmission line effects of the output signal line.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a method of assisting signal transitions includes receiving a transition at a circuit input and driving an output signal line responsive to the transition. Subsequent to a delay after a transition of the output signal line, the output signal line ceases to be driven. The delay may be produced substantially by transmission line effects of the output signal line.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings referred to in this description should not be understood as being drawn to scale except if specifically noted.
Reference will now be made in detail to the various embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with these embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
During the layout of an integrated circuit chip design, repeater circuits are inserted at periodic intervals along long metal wires in order to amplify signals (or remove distortion) as well as to reduce propagation delay (or maintain fast transition times). Synchronization timing or “clock” signal distribution networks, e.g., “clock trees,” frequently utilize such repeaters. Typically, there is a wide selection of repeater circuits available to the integrated circuit designer.
Conventional, or “classic” repeater circuits generally comprise relatively simple amplifier circuits. An amplifier circuit receives a transition and actively drives its output to the new voltage state. A problem with such conventional repeaters is that, after helping achieve one transition, such circuits continue to drive the wire and thus resist the next transition.
A second general classification of a repeater circuit design is known as or referred to as an “advanced” repeater. An advanced repeater circuit generally utilizes a delayed version of the input signal in order to limit the duration that the output portion of the advanced repeater fully drives the output line. By limiting the “full drive” duration, the advanced repeater may enhance the propagation of a signal without resisting subsequent transitions.
One difficulty in designing advanced repeater circuits is selecting and controlling the duration of the delay. In order to ensure a high-quality waveform, the delay should be long enough for the output to transition to the power supply rail, e.g., be strongly driven. However, the delay should further be short enough such that the output driver turns off prior to the arrival of a subsequent input clock edge. Straightforward delay-generation techniques, e.g., a series of inverter elements, are frequently used to generate such delays in advanced repeater circuits.
Unfortunately, however, the delay durations generated by such delay-generation techniques suffer from both intentional and unavoidable variations in circuit operation due to such factors as manufacturing process variations and the effects of operating temperature and operating voltage variations. For example, if the delay becomes too short, e.g., due to variation in operating conditions, the output driver(s) may not have enough time to drive the output to the desired state. Additionally, the use of a plurality of circuit elements to achieve a desirable target delay may undesirably increase circuit complexity, cost and/or power consumption while deleteriously decreasing wireablility.
In the embodiment of
In general, circuit 100 of
It is to be appreciated that feedback loop 190 is formed between output node 140 and the feedback inputs of devices 150 and 160.
Conventionally, feedback loop 190 may be schematically represented as an uninterrupted signal line, e.g., a direct connection between output node 140 and the feedback inputs of devices 150 and 160. However, such a schematic representation does not identify the high frequency physical effects influencing feedback loop 190. Consequently, feedback loop 190 is illustrated in
Exemplary operation of circuit 100 will now be described, assuming an initial condition of a low on input node 130 and a high on output node 140. In a steady-state condition, the high on output node 140 will have propagated to the feedback inputs of NOR 150 and NAND 160.
Responsive to a low to high transition on input node 130, there will be two high inputs to NAND 160 that ultimately turn on n-type device 120. Similarly, there will be two high inputs to NOR 150 that ultimately turn p-type device 110 off. Consequently, output node 140 will transition from high to low, being actively driven by n-type device 120.
The high to low transition on output node 140 will propagate through feedback loop 190. This transition will be delayed by transmission line effects on feedback loop 190, shown as lumped transmission line effects 180, ultimately reaching the feedback inputs of NOR 150 and NAND 160.
Responsive to the high to low transition on the feedback inputs of NOR 150 and NAND 160, both n-type device 120 and p-type device 110 will be turned off.
It is to be appreciated that output node 140 will tend to remain in its previous state, e.g., low in the previous example, even when not actively driven, e.g., when both n-type device 120 and p-type device 110 have been turned off. In accordance with alternative embodiments of the present invention, relatively weak “keeper” or “hold” circuitry 195 may be utilized to hold output node 140 in a steady state.
For example, such keeper circuitry 195 may operate at a reduced drive strength relative to the rising and falling transition circuitry. The keeper circuitry 195 maintains the state at the output node 140 in between operation of the transistors 110 and 120. That is, the keeper circuitry 195 maintains a high state at output node 140 after transistor 110 is shut off (and before transistor 120 is turned on), and also maintains a low state at output node 140 after transistor 120 is turned off (and before transistor 110 is turned on).
Co-pending, commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,807, filed Jun. 28, 2004, entitled “Circuits and Methods for Detecting and Assisting Wire Transitions” to Masleid and Kowalczyk, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, illustrates exemplary circuits and methods of such “keeper” circuitry suitable for inclusion with embodiments of the present invention.
Utilization of a signal's own distribution delay as a control input in an advanced repeater type of signal buffer presents several advantages in comparison to the conventional art. For example, no additional, dedicated circuitry is required to generate the delay. Such a decrease in circuitry in comparison to the conventional art advantageously reduces cost and power consumption while also improving wireability.
It is to be appreciated that the delay should be sufficient for each drive transistor, e.g., transistors 110 and 120 (or set of drive transistors), to be able to drive the output network, represented by output node 140, to a desirable level. For example, if the delay is too short, the output network may not achieve a level consistent with the technology's defined levels. Likewise, if the delay is too long, the output driver will fail to shut off prior to the subsequent transition, effectively reducing the output drive strength and limiting the operating frequency of the circuit.
In yet another advantage of embodiments in accordance with the present invention, there will, in general, be a convenient signal node endpoint nearby with sufficient delay for use as the feedback input, since in most cases a clock distribution network or tree 190 conforms to a uniform and ubiquitous set of endpoints.
In addition, there are numerous electrical advantages. For example, since the delay is generated by the signal distribution network 190, the delay inherently tracks changes in the signal distribution. For example, if due to process variation the signal is distributed in a “fast” manner, the delay will be similarly affected and consequently reduced, enabling such “fast” signals.
In 220, an output signal line is driven responsive to the transition. For example, the low to high transition received at input node 130 propagates though the control circuitry of circuit 100 to cause n-type device 120 to turn on, driving output node 140 to a low level.
In 230, the driving ceases subsequent to a delay after the transition of the output signal line. The delay is produced substantially by transmission line effects of the output signal line. For example, the high to low transition on output node 140 propagates through feedback loop 190 and causes n-type device 120 to turn off after a delay.
It is appreciated that other circuitry may hold the output signal line in its present state subsequent to the cessation of driving, in accordance with alternative embodiments of the present invention. In optional 240, the output signal line is weakly held in its present state.
In summary, embodiments of the present invention provide circuits (e.g., wire accelerators and repeaters), and methods thereof, for assisting signal transitions on a wire (such as a wire on an integrated circuit). Circuit embodiments in accordance with the present invention can both drive a signal on the wire and assist during wire transitions, without resisting the transitions.
Embodiments in accordance with the present invention are thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the below claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/171,845, filed Jun. 30, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/864,271, filed Jun. 8, 2004 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,807 filed Jun. 28, 2004, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3991380 | Pryor | Nov 1976 | A |
4498021 | Uya | Feb 1985 | A |
4700089 | Fujii et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4739252 | Malaviya et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4760279 | Saito et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4779013 | Tanaka | Oct 1988 | A |
5039893 | Tomisawa | Aug 1991 | A |
5128560 | Chern et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5166555 | Kano | Nov 1992 | A |
5227679 | Woo | Jul 1993 | A |
5264738 | Veendrick et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5297086 | Nasu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5319260 | Wanlass | Jun 1994 | A |
5410278 | Itoh et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414312 | Wong | May 1995 | A |
5455521 | Dobbelaere | Oct 1995 | A |
5467038 | Motley et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5497105 | Oh et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5525616 | Platt et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568103 | Nakashima et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587665 | Jiang | Dec 1996 | A |
5594360 | Wojciechowski | Jan 1997 | A |
5610548 | Masleid | Mar 1997 | A |
5614845 | Masleid | Mar 1997 | A |
5656963 | Masleid et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677650 | Kwasniewski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680359 | Jeong | Oct 1997 | A |
5698994 | Tsuji | Dec 1997 | A |
5739715 | Rawson | Apr 1998 | A |
5764110 | Ishibashi | Jun 1998 | A |
5767700 | Lee | Jun 1998 | A |
5777501 | AbouSeido | Jul 1998 | A |
5778214 | Taya et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791715 | Nebel | Aug 1998 | A |
5796313 | Eitan | Aug 1998 | A |
5797105 | Nakaya et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5811983 | Lundberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5880608 | Mehta et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894419 | Galambos et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5926050 | Proebsting | Jul 1999 | A |
5963043 | Nassif | Oct 1999 | A |
5963074 | Arkin | Oct 1999 | A |
5969543 | Erickson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977763 | Loughmiller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982211 | Ko | Nov 1999 | A |
6011403 | Gillette | Jan 2000 | A |
6025738 | Masleid | Feb 2000 | A |
6028490 | Komatsu | Feb 2000 | A |
6031403 | Gersbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6069506 | Miller, Jr. et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087886 | Ko | Jul 2000 | A |
6111447 | Ternullo, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114840 | Farrell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127872 | Kumata | Oct 2000 | A |
6154099 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154100 | Okamoto | Nov 2000 | A |
6160755 | Norman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172545 | Ishii | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172943 | Yuzuki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188260 | Stotz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198334 | Tomobe et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204710 | Goetting et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229747 | Cho et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242936 | Ho et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242937 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262601 | Chloe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275091 | Saeki | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281706 | Wert et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285230 | Na | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294930 | Goetting et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321282 | Horowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323706 | Stark et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366115 | DiTommaso | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407571 | Furuya et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426641 | Koch et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426652 | Greenhill et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455901 | Kameyama et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459319 | Sako | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466063 | Chen | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476632 | La Rosa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489796 | Tomishima | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6518809 | Kotra | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535014 | Chetlur et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538471 | Stan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538522 | Aipperspach et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545519 | Carballo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570407 | Sugisawa et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573777 | Saint-Laurent et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577157 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577176 | Masleid et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6621318 | Burr | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657504 | Deal et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664837 | Oh et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690242 | Fang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697929 | Cherkauer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6724214 | Manna et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731140 | Masleid et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731179 | Abadeer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6759863 | Moore | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762638 | Correale, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762966 | LaRosa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768363 | Yoo et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774734 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798230 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6815971 | Wang et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815977 | Sabbavarapu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831494 | Fu et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6879200 | Komura et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882172 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885210 | Suzuki | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6903564 | Suzuki | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6924669 | Itoh et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7053660 | Itoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053680 | Masleid et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7119580 | Masleid et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142018 | Masleid et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7173455 | Masleid et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7239170 | Suen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7271638 | Takai et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295041 | Masleid et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304503 | Masleid et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7336103 | Masleid et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
20010000426 | Sung et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20010028278 | Ooishi | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030561 | Asano et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010052623 | Kameyama et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020056016 | Horowitz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020178415 | Saraf | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005775 | Washeleski et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011413 | Masleid | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042960 | Gomm | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057775 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030160630 | Earle | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030189465 | Abadeer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231713 | Masleid et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040104731 | Vollertsen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119501 | Sabbavarapu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119503 | Jamshidi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124900 | Brox | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148111 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040257115 | Bertram et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050184720 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212547 | Suzuki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248368 | Bertram et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1398639 | Mar 2004 | EP |
03089624 | Apr 1991 | JP |
4061516 | Mar 1992 | JP |
06216723 | Aug 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080218215 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11171845 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12124136 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10864271 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11171845 | US | |
Parent | 10879807 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 10864271 | US |