This application relates to technical advances necessarily rooted in computer technology and directed to digital television, and more particularly to Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0.
The Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0 suite of standards is a set of over a dozen industry technical standards as indicated in A/300 for delivering the next generation of broadcast television. ATSC 3.0 supports delivery of a wide range of television services including televised video, interactive services, non-real time delivery of data, and tailored advertising to a large number of receiving devices, from ultra-high definition televisions to wireless telephones. ATSC 3.0 also orchestrates coordination between broadcast content (referred to as “over the air”) and related broadband delivered content and services (referred to as “over the top”). ATSC 3.0 is designed to be flexible so that as technology evolves, advances can be readily incorporated without requiring a complete overhaul of any related technical standard. Present principles are directed to such advances as divulged below.
As understood herein, signaling and other ATSC 3.0 content typically is conveyed in media presentation description (MPD) files. An MPD is formatted in accordance with the dynamic adaptive streaming over hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) (DASH) protocol. When a player starts playback of ATSC 3.0 content the MPD is parsed by the player and playback starts as per DASH protocol.
On the player (TV), when the display button is pressed, ATSC 3.0 content attribute information such as language, aspect ratio, and bitrate may be sought to be displayed. However, this information heretofore has not been part of the MPD. Instead, this attribute information is received in Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) media transport protocol (MMTP) packets that arrive asynchronously to creating the MPD to which the packets relate, meaning that a short pause may be required to wait for the MMTP packets to create (and transmit) the MPD, delaying play back, which is undesirable.
Accordingly, a digital television system such as an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0 system includes at least one processor configured to execute instructions which when executed by the processor configure the processor to identify at least one Advanced Television systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0 content. The instructions are executable to, asynchronously from a broadcast of the ATSC 3.0 content, identify a least one Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) media transport protocol (MMTP) packet containing information pertaining to at least a first display descriptor related to at least a first attribute of the ATSC 3.0 content. The instructions are executable to, responsive to a display command to present the ATSC 3.0 content, generate at least one media presentation description (MPD) file including a dynamic type indicator and at least the first display descriptor, and use the MPD by at least one player in response to the display command.
In examples, the first attribute may include a language attribute such as a captioning language or audio language related to the ATDC 3.0 content. The first attribute may include, in addition or in combination, any of a video bitrate attribute and an aspect ratio attribute.
In example implementations, the dynamic type indicator is in an MPD set of the MPD. In some embodiments, the first display descriptor is in an adaptation set of the MPD.
The system also may include the player configured with executable instructions to parse the MPD and responsive to the dynamic type indicator, parse the first display descriptor from the MPD to present on at least one user interface (UI) the first attribute.
In a digital television delivery system, a method includes receiving at least a first media presentation description (MPD) file for presenting digital television content and identifying a dynamic type indicator in the MPD. The method includes, responsive to identifying the dynamic type indicator, parsing at least a first adaption set of the MPD to identify at least a first display descriptor indicating at least a first attribute of the digital television content. Responsive to identifying the first display descriptor, the method includes presenting on at least one display at least the first attribute of the digital television content.
In another aspect, a system of digital television includes at least one player comprising at least one processor configured with instructions executable to parse at least a first media presentation description (MPD) file containing information for presenting digital television content. The instructions can be executed to, responsive to identifying that the first MPD contains a dynamic type indicator, parse at least one adaptation set in the first MPD to extract information pertaining to at least a first attribute of the digital television content. The first attribute includes at least one of: bitrate, language, aspect ratio. The instructions are executable to present on at least one display the first attribute.
The details of the present application, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
This disclosure relates to technical advances in Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) 3.0 television. A system herein may include ATSC 3.0 source components and client components, connected via broadcast and/or over a network such that data may be exchanged between the client and ATSC 3.0 source components. The client components may include one or more computing devices including portable televisions (e.g. smart TVs, Internet-enabled TVs), portable computers such as laptops and tablet computers, and other mobile devices including smart phones and additional examples discussed below. These client devices may operate with a variety of operating environments. For example, some of the client computers may employ, as examples, operating systems from Microsoft, or a Unix operating system, or operating systems produced by Apple Computer or Google, such as Android®. These operating environments may be used to execute one or more browsing programs, such as a browser made by Microsoft or Google or Mozilla or other browser program that can access web sites hosted by the Internet servers discussed below.
ATSC 3.0 source components may include broadcast transmission components and servers and/or gateways that may include one or more processors executing instructions that configure the source components to broadcast data and/or to transmit data over a network such as the Internet. A client component and/or a local ATSC 3.0 source component may be instantiated by a game console such as a Sony PlayStation®, a personal computer, etc.
Information may be exchanged over a network between the clients and servers. To this end and for security, servers and/or clients can include firewalls, load balancers, temporary storages, and proxies, and other network infrastructure for reliability and security.
As used herein, instructions refer to computer-implemented steps for processing information in the system. Instructions can be implemented in software, firmware or hardware and include any type of programmed step undertaken by components of the system.
A processor may be any conventional general-purpose single- or multi-chip processor that can execute logic by means of various lines such as address lines, data lines, and control lines and registers and shift registers.
Software modules described by way of the flow charts and user interfaces herein can include various sub-routines, procedures, etc. Without limiting the disclosure, logic stated to be executed by a particular module can be redistributed to other software modules and/or combined together in a single module and/or made available in a shareable library. While flow chart format may be used, it is to be understood that software may be implemented as a state machine or other logical method.
Present principles described herein can be implemented as hardware, software, firmware, or combinations thereof; hence, illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps are set forth in terms of their functionality.
Further to what has been alluded to above, logical blocks, modules, and circuits can be implemented or performed with a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A processor can be implemented by a controller or state machine or a combination of computing devices.
The functions and methods described below, when implemented in software, can be written in an appropriate language such as but not limited to hypertext markup language (HTML)-5, Java®/Javascript, C# or C++, and can be stored on or transmitted through a computer-readable storage medium such as a random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM) or other optical disk storage such as digital versatile disc (DVD), magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices including removable thumb drives, etc. A connection may establish a computer-readable medium. Such connections can include, as examples, hard-wired cables including fiber optics and coaxial wires and digital subscriber line (DSL) and twisted pair wires.
Components included in one embodiment can be used in other embodiments in any appropriate combination. For example, any of the various components described herein and/or depicted in the Figures may be combined, interchanged or excluded from other embodiments.
“A system having at least one of A, B, and C” (likewise “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” and “a system having at least one of A, B, C”) includes systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.
Turning to
Also, one or more of the receivers 14 may communicate, via a wired and/or wireless network link 20 such as the Internet, with over-the-top (OTT) equipment 22 of the broadcaster equipment 10 typically in a one-to-one relationship. The OTA equipment 12 may be co-located with the OTT equipment 22 or the two sides 12, 22 of the broadcaster equipment 10 may be remote from each other and may communicate with each other through appropriate means. In any case, a receiver 14 may receive ATSC 3.0 television signals OTA over a tuned-to ATSC 3.0 television channel and may also receive related content, including television, OTT (broadband). Note that computerized devices described in all of the figures herein may include some or all of the components set forth for various devices in
Referring now to
The broadcaster equipment 10 can include one or more processors 200 accessing one or more computer storage media 202 such as any memories or storages described herein to execute one or more software applications in a top level application layer 204. The application layer 204 can include one or more software applications written in, e.g., HTML5/Javascript running in a runtime environment. Without limitation, the applications in the application stack 204 may include linear TV applications, interactive service applications, companion screen applications, personalization applications, emergency alert applications, and usage reporting applications. The applications typically are embodied in software that represents the elements that the viewer experiences, including video coding, audio coding and the run-time environment. As an example, an application may be provided that enables a user to control dialog, use alternate audio tracks, control audio parameters such as normalization and dynamic range, and so on.
Below the application layer 204 is a presentation layer 206. The presentation layer 206 includes, on the broadcast (OTA) side, broadcast audio-video playback devices referred to as “media playback units” (MPU) 208 that decode and playback, on one or more displays and speakers, wirelessly broadcast audio video content. The MPU 208 is configured to present International Organization for Standardization (ISO) base media file format (BMFF) data representations 210 and video in high efficiency video coding (HEVC) with audio in, e.g., Dolby audio compression (AC)-4 format. ISO BMFF is a general file structure for time-based media files broken into “segments” and presentation metadata. Each of the files is essentially a collection of nested objects each with a type and a length. To facilitate decryption, the MPU 208 may access a broadcast side encrypted media extensions (EME)/common encryption (CENC) module 212.
On the broadband (OTT or computer network) side, the presentation layer 206 can include one or more dynamic adaptive streaming over hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) (DASH) player/decoders 220 for decoding and playing audio-video content from the Internet. To this end the DASH player 220 may access a broadband side EME/CENC module 222. The DASH content may be provided as DASH segments 224 in ISO/BMFF format.
As was the case for the broadcast side, the broadband side of the presentation layer 206 may include NRT content in files 226, and may also include signaling objects 228 for providing play back signaling.
Below the presentation layer 206 in the protocol stack is a session layer 230. The session layer 230 includes, on the broadcast side, MMTP protocol 232 and ROUTE protocol 234. MMTP wraps the ISO BMFF files with metadata for broadcast delivery. Essentially, MMTP contains pointers to signaling components that identify physical layer pipes (PL), each of which may be thought of as a separate video stream configured for a particular receiver type with source and destination identification information. Other signaling components typically are provided to aid in the playback of the audio video content.
On the broadband side the session layer 230 includes HTTP protocol 236 which may be implemented as HTTP-secure (HTTP(S). The broadcast side of the session layer 230 also may employ a HTTP proxy module 238 and a service list table (SLT) 240. The SLT 240 includes a table of signaling information which is used to build a basic service listing and provide bootstrap discovery of the broadcast content.
A transport layer 242 is below the session layer 230 in the protocol stack for establishing low-latency and loss-tolerating connections. On the broadcast side the transport layer 242 uses user datagram protocol (UDP) 244 and on the broadband side transmission control protocol (TCP) 246.
The protocol stack also includes a network layer 248 below the transport layer 242. The network layer 248 uses Internet protocol (IP) on both sides for IP packet communication, with multicast delivery being typical on the broadcast side and unicast being typical on the broadband side.
Below the network layer 248 is the physical layer 250 which includes broadcast transmission/receive equipment 252 and computer network interface(s) 254 for communicating on the respective physical media associated with the two sides. The physical layer 250 converts machine access code (MAC) format to be suitable to be transported over the relevant medium, and may add forward error correction functionality to enable error correction at the receiver as well as contain modulation and demodulation modules to incorporate modulation and demodulation functionalities. This converts bits into symbols for long distance transmission as well as to increase bandwidth efficiency. On the OTA side the physical layer 250 typically includes a wireless broadcast transmitter to broadcast data wirelessly using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) while on the OTT side the physical layer 250 includes computer transmission components to send data over the Internet.
A DASH-industry forum (IF) profile sent through the various protocols (HTTP/TCP/IP) in the protocol stack may be used on the broadband side. Media files in the DASH-IF profile based on the ISO BMFF may be used as the delivery, media encapsulation and synchronization format for both broadcast and broadband delivery.
Each receiver 14 typically includes a protocol stack that is complementary to that of the broadcaster equipment.
A receiver 14 in
Accordingly, to undertake such principles the receiver 14 can be established by some or all of the components shown in
In addition to the foregoing, the receiver 14 may also include one or more input ports 268 such as a high definition multimedia interface (HDMI) port or a USB port to physically connect (using a wired connection) to another CE device and/or a headphone port to connect headphones to the receiver 14 for presentation of audio from the receiver 14 to a user through the headphones. For example, the input port 268 may be connected via wire or wirelessly to a cable or satellite source of audio video content. Thus, the source may be a separate or integrated set top box, or a satellite receiver. Or, the source may be a game console or disk player.
The receiver 14 may further include one or more computer memories 270 such as disk-based or solid-state storage that are not transitory signals, in some cases embodied in the chassis of the receiver as standalone devices or as a personal video recording device (PVR) or video disk player either internal or external to the chassis of the receiver for playing back audio video (AV) programs or as removable memory media. Also, in some embodiments, the receiver 14 can include a position or location receiver 272 such as but not limited to a cellphone receiver, global positioning satellite (GPS) receiver, and/or altimeter that is configured to e.g. receive geographic position information from at least one satellite or cellphone tower and provide the information to the processor 266 and/or determine an altitude at which the receiver 14 is disposed in conjunction with the processor 266. However, it is to be understood that that another suitable position receiver other than a cellphone receiver, GPS receiver and/or altimeter may be used in accordance with present principles to determine the location of the receiver 14 in e.g. all three dimensions.
Continuing the description of the receiver 14, in some embodiments the receiver 14 may include one or more cameras 274 that may include one or more of a thermal imaging camera, a digital camera such as a webcam, and/or a camera integrated into the receiver 14 and controllable by the processor 266 to gather pictures/images and/or video in accordance with present principles. Also included on the receiver 14 may be a Bluetooth® transceiver 276 or other Near Field Communication (NFC) element for communication with other devices using Bluetooth® and/or NFC technology, respectively. An example NFC element can be a radio frequency identification (RFID) element.
Further still, the receiver 14 may include one or more auxiliary sensors 278 (such as a motion sensor such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, cyclometer, or a magnetic sensor and combinations thereof), an infrared (IR) sensor for receiving IR commands from a remote control, an optical sensor, a speed and/or cadence sensor, a gesture sensor (for sensing gesture commands) and so on providing input to the processor 266. An IR sensor 280 may be provided to receive commands from a wireless remote control. A battery (not shown) may be provided for powering the receiver 14.
The companion device 16 may incorporate some or all of the elements shown in relation to the receiver 14 described above.
The methods described herein may be implemented as software instructions executed by a processor, suitably configured application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) or field programmable gate array (FPGA) modules, or any other convenient manner as would be appreciated by those skilled in those art. Where employed, the software instructions may be embodied in a non-transitory device such as a CD ROM or Flash drive. The software code instructions may alternatively be embodied in a transitory arrangement such as a radio or optical signal, or via a download over the Internet.
Now referring to
In the example shown, the MPD 300 includes an MPD set 302 that includes a type field 304 indicating at 306 that the MPD is dynamic, i.e., that it may be created on the transmission end prior to fully completing it with attribute information. In the example shown, the MPD 300 has been completed upon receipt of the MMTP packets containing the attribute information, so in one or more adaptation sets 308 one or more content attribute indicators 310 may appear. In the example shown, the content attribute indicators include an indication that the language of the captioning of the related ATC 3.0 content is in English and that the aspect ratio of the video of the related ATSC 3.0 content is 16:9. Further attributes may include language of the ATSC 3.0 content audio and video bitrate.
Also, further attributes may include an easy reader attribute for captioning (for example, er:0) and an image or text profile for captions (for example, profile:0;3d.0). If desired, a representation set 312 nested within the adaptation set 308 may include a codec indicator 314 indicating that a codec for captions (e.g., stpp.ttml.imlt).
Refer now to
Note that period indicated in the XML above may be encrypted for digital rights management (DRM) purposes.
It will be appreciated that whilst present principals have been described with reference to some example embodiments, these are not intended to be limiting, and that various alternative arrangements may be used to implement the subject matter claimed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5144425 | Joseph | Sep 1992 | A |
6005938 | Banker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6263022 | Chen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6373904 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393562 | Maillard | May 2002 | B1 |
6490705 | Boyce | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496217 | Piotrowski | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501797 | van der Schaar | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6584199 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6674477 | Yamaguchi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6920222 | Tsukahara et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7095782 | Cohen | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7958532 | Paul | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8064389 | Khan | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072943 | Khan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8284845 | Kovacevic | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8401191 | Chen et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8467656 | Kamio | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8671422 | Foti | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8904445 | Britt | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9002006 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9848217 | Choi | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9986302 | Takahashi | May 2018 | B2 |
10397642 | Tsukagoshi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10595066 | Czelhan | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20030073402 | Herring et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030172376 | Coffin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040208239 | Karlsson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050198680 | Baran et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060004661 | Bacon | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053442 | Ridderheim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070098165 | Koshikawa | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179948 | Jennings, III | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080062168 | Poullier | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120645 | Yun | May 2008 | A1 |
20080168133 | Osborne | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170630 | Falik | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090034629 | Suh | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090136203 | Stam et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187960 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222855 | Vare | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268806 | Kim | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296535 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100254370 | Jana | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260254 | Kimmich | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260268 | Cowan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110002397 | Wang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110096828 | Chen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110142139 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164683 | Takahashi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187503 | Costa | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110239078 | Luby | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110289542 | Kitazato | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120117592 | Strein | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167133 | Carroll et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120185907 | Park | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192220 | Wyatt et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120224651 | Murakami | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250619 | Twitchell, Jr. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120307654 | Pantos et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320168 | Yun | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007799 | Sandoval | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130136193 | Hwang | May 2013 | A1 |
20130247094 | Hardin | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130305304 | Hwang | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326553 | Nicolas | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332976 | Shenker et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140050458 | Mochinaga | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098289 | Jang | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115472 | Mochinaga | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140119712 | Jang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140204177 | Hattori | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211861 | Lee | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140325572 | Yie et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150020131 | Choi | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150100996 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150195327 | Bouazizi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150281799 | Lim | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150371604 | Park | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160234348 | Mao et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234355 | Lee et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160234682 | Mandyam | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160277778 | Kwon | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160360288 | Mandyam et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160366479 | Crowe et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373489 | Lee et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373821 | Nair | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170054520 | Kwak et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070789 | Liassides et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170111692 | An | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134763 | Hwang et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170164033 | Tsukagoshi | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170188112 | Takahashi | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170238061 | Deshpande | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170302982 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170366830 | Czelhan | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374421 | Yim | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170374429 | Yang | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180146022 | Kwon | May 2018 | A1 |
20180184136 | Oh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180205975 | Oh et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180270539 | Kim | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180288468 | Yamagishi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180373847 | Lo et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190058909 | Eyer et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058929 | Young et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190174156 | Crawford et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190215575 | Yang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190246148 | Oh et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190356944 | Patel et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200007922 | Yun | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2016140479 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2016178494 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2016190720 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2017184648 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2018202768 | Nov 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2020. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Applicant's response to Final Office Action filed Mar. 19, 2020. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2021. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Applicant's response to Non-Final Office Action filed Dec. 6, 2021. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2021. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Applicant's response to Final Office Action filed Apr. 9, 2021. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2021. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Applicant's response to Non-Final Office Action filed Apr. 8, 2021. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2020. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Applicant's response to Non-Final Office Action filed Jan. 5, 2021. |
“ATSC 3.0 Standards”, retrieved on Feb. 16, 2018 from https://www.atsc.org/standards/atsc-3-0-standards/. |
“ATSC Standard: ATSC 3.0 Interactive Content”, Advanced Television Systems Committee, Dec. 18, 2017. |
“ATSCaster—ROUTE and MMTP server for ATSC 3.0”, ENENSYS, Jul. 2018. |
“ISO/IEC 23009-5:2017—Information technology—Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH)—Part 5: Server and network assisted DASH (SAND)”, May 2017. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, file history of related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, filed Mar. 19, 2018. |
I. Bouazizi, “MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, Samsung Research America, Mar. 4, 2014. |
Xu et al., “DASH and MMT and their Applications”, (2016). |
Kim et al., “Method of DASH segments into a MMTP stream for switching contents under a hybrid broadcasting environment” (2017). |
Paul Joseph Hearty, Mark Eyer, “Delivery of Information Related to Digital Rights Management (DRM) in a Terrestrial Broadcast System”, file history of related U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,933, Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2019. |
Charlemagne Aguilar Santos, Tanmay Agnihotri, “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, file history of related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, filed Feb. 13, 2019. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2021. |
Aguilar Santos et al., “ATSC 3.0 Advertising Notification Using Event Streams”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, Applicant's response to Final Office Action filed Sep. 5, 2021. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2020. |
Agnihotri et al., “ATSC 3.0 Playback Using MPEG Media Transport Protocol (MMTP)”, related U.S. Appl. No. 15/925,190, Applicant's response to Non-Final Office Action filed Jun. 20, 2020. |
“ATSC Candidate Standard Revision: Signaling, Delivery, Synchronization, and Error Protection”, Doc. S33-1-893r4, Apr. 30, 2018. |
“RFC 4033, DNS Security Introduction and Requirements,” Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S. Rose, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Mar. 2005. |
“RFC 4055, Additional Algorithms and Identifiers for RSA Cryptography for use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” J. Schaad, B. Kaliski, R. Housley, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Jun. 2005. |
“ATSC Standard: ATSC 3.0 Interactive Content (A/344)”, May 2, 2019. |
“ATSC Standard: ATSC 3.0 Security and Service Protection”, Aug. 20, 2019. |
“ATSC Standard: ATSC 3.0 System”, Sep. 17, 2019. |
“ATSC Standard: Signaling, Delivery, Synchronization, and Error Protection (A/331)”, Jun. 19, 2019. |
“RFC 3279, Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” L. Bassham, W. Polk, R. Housley, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Apr. 2002. |
“RFC 5280, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile,” D. Cooper, S. Santesson, S. Farrell, S. Boeyen, R. Housley, W. Polk, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, May 2008. |
“RFC 5289, TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM),” E. Rescorla, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Aug. 2008. |
“RFC 5480, Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information,” S. Turner, D. Brown, K. Yiu, R. Housley, T. Polk, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Mar. 2009. |
“RFC 5652, Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS),” R. Housley, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Sep. 2009. |
“RFC 5751, Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.Message Specification,” B. Ramsdell, S. Turner, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Jan. 2010. |
“RFC 5753, Use of Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Algorithms in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS),” S. Turner, D. Brown, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Jan. 2010. |
“RFC 5758, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithms and Identifiers for DSA and ECDSA,” Q. Dang, S. Santesson, K. Moriarty, D. Brown, T. Polk, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Jan. 2010. |
“RFC 5940, Additional Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Revocation Information Choices,” S. Turner, R. Housley, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Aug. 2010. |
“RFC 6960, X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol—OCSP,” S. Santesson, M. Myers, R. Ankney, A. Malpani, S. Galperin, C. Adams, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Jun. 2013. |
“RFC 5019, The Lightweight Online Ceilificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume Environments,” A. Deacon, R. Hurst, Internet Engineering Task Force, Fremont, CA, Sep. 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,933, filed Dec. 10, 2018, Paul Joseph Hearty. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,078, filed Feb. 13, 2019, Charlemagne Aguilar Santos. |
Paul Joseph Hearty, Mark Eyer, “Delivery of Information Related to Digital Rights Management (DRM) in a Terrestrial Broadcast System”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,933, Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2020. |
Paul Joseph Hearty, Mark Eyer, “Delivery of Information Related to Digital Rights Management (DRM) in a Terrestrial Broadcast System”, related U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,933, Applicant's response to Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200186741 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62613155 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15925190 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16710746 | US |