1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to aerial delivery systems, and, more particularly, to parafoil-based payload delivery systems.
2. Description of the Related Art
Maneuverable ram-air parafoils are widely used today. The list of users includes skydivers, smoke jumpers, and specialized defense forces. The extended range of ram-air parafoils compared to round parachutes makes ram-air parafoils very practical for payload delivery. Further, the touchdown accuracy requirement for parafoil-based systems should be much tighter that round parachutes, but it largely depends on a guidance, navigation and control (GNC) unit to produce and execute the corresponding steering commands.
Recent introduction of the Global Positioning System (GPS) made the development of fully autonomous ram-air parafoils possible. Autonomous parafoil capability means delivery of the parafoil system, typically including a payload, to a desired landing point, e.g., a target, from a release point using an onboard computer, sensors and actuators. A navigation subsystem manages data acquisition, processes sensor(s) data, and provides guidance and control subsystems with information about the parafoil. Using this information along with local wind profiles, the guidance subsystem determines the delivery and generates a feasible descent trajectory all the way down to the desired impact point, i.e., the target. The control subsystem tracks this trajectory using the information provided by the navigation subsystem and onboard actuators.
Introduction of the GPS (Global Positioning System) allowed the development of fully autonomous different-weight aerodynamic decelerator systems. Realistically, it was desirable to have payloads aerially delivered from large standoff distances with persistent <100 m circular error probable (CEP) accuracy. Accordingly, during the last decade, several GNC concepts for gliding parachute applications have been developed and tested. Specifically, some systems were demonstrated during Precision Airdrop Technology Conference and Demonstrations (PATCAD) held at the U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, Ariz., e.g., PATCAD-2001, PATCAD-2003, PATCAD-2005, PATCAD-2007, and PATCAD-2009, and Precision Airdrop Demonstration Capability PCAD-2006 and PCAD-2008 held near Bordeaux, France. However, touchdown accuracy of parafoil systems was still problematic, especially with small parafoils having light weight payloads. Accurate delivery of a light-weight payload (10-15 pounds) with a small parafoil on target was very difficult because small parafoils are very sensitive to wind, e.g. the trajectories are easily impacted by wind.
Embodiments in accordance with the invention address the terminal phase of the guided descent of a parafoil delivered payload, where the majority of errors contribute to the final touchdown accuracy. Embodiments in accordance with the invention can be beneficially implemented in the area of light weight payload (10-15 pounds) delivery by a small aerial parafoil. Such small parafoil systems are very sensitive to wind.
In accordance with one embodiment, persistent high accuracy touchdown payload delivery is attained by implementing a two-phase aerial delivery procedure. The first phase employs a small parafoil air delivery of a payload within close proximity of a target. The second phase employs a target designator and harpoon launcher that provide high accuracy delivery of the payload by anchoring the payload to the target with a harpoon and rope deployed from the harpoon launcher, and subsequently reeling the payload to the target.
A complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the accompanying drawings, when considered in conjunction with the subsequent, detailed description, in which:
In one embodiment, parafoil 10 steers towards a target 16 in accordance with directions provided by a guidance, navigation and control (GNC) system.
In one embodiment, there are two phases of the final descent phase of parafoil 10. The first phase, herein also referred to as final phase one, is descent of parafoil 10 within a close proximity of target 16. The second phase, herein also referred to as final phase two, is anchoring of parafoil 10 to target 16 while still in the air, and subsequent reeling of payload 12 to target 16 as further described and shown in
In one embodiment, reel mechanism 20 includes a reel that allows rope 26 to be taken up on to the reel after deployment. Reel mechanisms are well known to those of skill in the art and are not further described in detail herein. Rope 26 can be any of a variety of deployable connectors, such as natural fiber ropes, synthetic material ropes, metal wire ropes, chain link ropes, or other suitable connector rope. Herein the phrase autonomous parafoil capability means the ability to deliver a payload to a target from a release point (within a corresponding reach distance) using an onboard computer and sensors of a guidance, navigation and control (GNC) system.
In one embodiment, in final phase one, guidance, navigation and control (GNC) system 28 manages data acquisition, processes sensor(s) data, generates a feasible trajectory to a target, e.g., target 16, and provides guidance and control by onboard actuators. In one embodiment, when parafoil 10 is in close proximity of target 16, for example, in a range of about 100-200 feet, optical target designator 22 starts to search for target 16.
It can be understood by those of skill in the art that embodiments in accordance with the invention described herein can be modified to accommodate particular operating requirements and environments, and that the particular embodiments detailed herein are not intended to be limiting of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/316,217, filed Mar. 22, 2010, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2545248 | Winzen et al. | Mar 1951 | A |
3564543 | Nehama et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
5992794 | Rotman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6343244 | Yoneda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6416019 | Hilliard et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6758442 | Bailey | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6808144 | Nicolai et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
8401860 | Evans | Mar 2013 | B1 |
20060076455 | Ljungberg et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070088466 | Preston | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272801 | Hilliard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284474 | Olsen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080149775 | Dunker et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090026319 | Strong | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100228408 | Ford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110192938 | DiMarzio et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1657611 | Sep 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Slegers, N.J., and Yakimenko, O.A. “Optimal Control for Terminal Guidance of Autonomous Parafoils.” Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, May 4-7, 2009. AIAA 2009-2958. pp. 1-21. |
Yakimenko, O.A., Slegers, N.J., and Tiaden, R. “Development and Testing of the Miniature Aerial Delivery System Snowflake.” Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, May 4-7, 2009. AIAA 2009-2980. pp. 1-15. |
Bourakov, E.A., Yakimenko, O.A., and Slegers, N.J. “Exploiting a GSM Network for Precise Payload Delivery.” Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, May 4-7, 2009. AIAA 2009-3004. pp. 1-14. |
Hewgley, C.W., and Yakimenko, O.A. “Precision Guided Airdrop for Vertical Replenishment of Naval Vessels.” Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, Seattle, WA, May 4-7, 2009. AIAA 2009-2995. pp. 1-13. |
Yakimenko, O.A., Slegers, N.J., Bourakov, E.A., Hewgley, C.W., Bordetsky, A.B., Jensen, R.P., Robinson, A.B., Malone, J.R., and Heidt, P.E.,“Mobile System for Precise Aero Delivery with Global Reach Network Capability.” ICAA 2009. IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 2009. Dec. 9-11, 2009. pp. 1394-1398. |
Brown, G., Haggard, R., and Fogleman, J. “Parafoils for Shipboard Recovery of UAVs.” 1991, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. AIAA 91-0835-CP. pp. 48-53. |
Carter, D.W., George, S., Hattis, P.D., McConley, M.W., Rasmussen, S.A., Singh, L. And Tavan S. “Autonomous Large Parafoil Guidance, Navigation, and Control System Design Status.” 19th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, May 21-24, 2007, Williamsburg, VA. AIAA 2007-2514. pp. 1 -15. |
Firefly brochure. [retrieved on Mar. 13, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.airborne-sys.com/pages/view/firefly>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61316217 | Mar 2010 | US |