The present invention relates to the in-flight control of aircraft and, more particularly, to aerodynamic brakes for reducing airspeed.
The design of in-flight control systems for modern high speed aircraft, particularly jet aircraft, may require deployment of one or more braking panels into the air stream to increase drag and reduce airspeed. Aerodynamic braking is particularly important in a rapid descent or to increase the angle of approach without increasing the aircraft speed. Braking panels may also, under some circumstances, be deployed just after touchdown to slow the aircraft initially to the point where wheel brakes can be safely applied.
Conventionally, brake panels are hingedly secured to the fuselage at their upstream end and pivotally open rearwardly. As such, a relatively large deployment force is required to move conventional speed brake panels into the air stream against the drag load. Usually, a fluid actuator of considerable capacity is used for this purpose. It will be appreciated that this type of operating system is inherently heavy and adds undesirable weight to the aircraft.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for an aerodynamic speed brake for an aircraft that requires relatively small forces to deploy and retract, and that reduces the loads applied to the fuselage.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an improved dynamic speed brake arrangement that requires significantly less operating force for deployment, and thus reduces power requirements, weight, and stress loads as compared with known speed brake mechanisms.
According to one embodiment, the device includes a pair of speed brake panels mounted on opposite sides of a portion of the aircraft, such as the fuselage. The panels are normally located in a retracted position and are formed to match the shape of adjacent portions of the aircraft. When activated, the panels swing outwardly to deployed positions in which they extend into the air stream and increase aerodynamic drag.
According to one embodiment, the operating mechanism for deploying and retracting the brake panels includes a linear actuator secured to the frame of the fuselage and an operating head that is moved by the actuator in a linear path generally parallel to the axis of the fuselage. The brake panels are operatively connected to the operating head so that as the actuating head is moved linearly from a downstream rest position to an upstream actuating position, the panels swing outwardly in opposite directions to their respective extended or deployed positions.
Deployment and retraction of the brake panels in response to linear movement of the operating head is achieved by operation of a pair of toggle assemblies. Each toggle assembly includes a control link pivotally connected at one end to a fixed support bracket and a carrier link pivotally connected between the other end of the control link and the operating head. Thus, linear forward movement of the operating head causes the toggle assemblies to retract so as to expand outwardly in opposite directions and move the panels toward an outward, deployed position. The aft portion of the fuselage is provided with a pair of openings on opposite sides. Portions of the toggle assemblies project through the openings during deployment of the panels.
In further accordance with the present invention, the lengths of the toggle assembly links, and the positions of the connections to the brake panel and the support structure relative to the aerodynamic center of the brake panels are selected so as to minimize a force required to deploy and retract the brake panels.
These and further features of the invention will be apparent with reference to the following figures, wherein:
Referring more particularly to the drawings and initially to
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention, two speed brake panels 13, 14 are provided on opposite sides of the aft portion of the fuselage 11 below the empennage 12. The panels are adapted to swing outwardly from a retracted or normal position shown in
In their retracted positions, the brake panels 13, 14, conform generally to the shape of the adjacent portions of the fuselage 11 so that the streamlined shape of the aircraft 10 is not interrupted. When the brake panels 13, 14 are partially or fully deployed they project outward into the air stream to produce additional aerodynamic drag and reduce airspeed.
Openings 15, 16 are formed in the aft portion of the fuselage on opposite sides as shown in
A frame of the fuselage has a ring-shaped structural member 17 near the aft portion thereof. A vertically oriented bracket 18 is secured to the member 17 to provide a support for a control mechanism that operates the brake panels 13, 14. The orientation and structural features of the illustrated bracket 18 and structural member 17 are normally specific to the particular aircraft, and should not be considered as limiting the scope of the present invention, as various alternative support configurations are contemplated and considered to be functional alternatives.
The control mechanism includes a linear actuator 20 with a fluid cylinder 21 and a piston 25. The cylinder 21 has a mounting member 22 at its rearward or downstream end that serves to simultaneously connect the cylinder 21 and a control link 31, 41 of a pair of toggle assemblies 30, 40, respectively, to the bracket 18. Attaching the cylinder 21 and toggle assemblies 30, 40 to the bracket 18 via a single mounting member 22 saves space and reduces weight. The mounting member 22 has a pair of ears 22a that extend laterally, with each of the ears 22a defining journals that form part of a pair of fixed hinge joints 23, 24.
The piston 25 includes a piston rod 26 and the operating head 27, with the operating head being disposed at a distal or free end of the piston rod 26, as shown in
The first and second toggle assemblies 30, 40, best shown in
In addition to the control link 31, the first toggle assembly 30 also includes a carrier link 33. A first end of the control link 31 is pivotally connected to the mounting member 22 at the fixed hinge joint 23. A second or opposite end of the control link 31 is pivotally connected to the carrier link 33 at a pivot joint 35. A rearward end of the carrier link 33 is pivotally connected to the operating head 27 at the movable hinge joint 28.
The second toggle assembly 40 is essentially identical to the first toggle assembly 30 but is mounted in reverse orientation, as shown in
It will be appreciated that the carrier link 33, 43 is fixed to, or integrated with, an inner surface of the associated brake panel 13, 14. As such, the carrier link 33, 43 may be integrally formed with the panel 13, 14, or may be separately formed and secured to the panel 13, 14 to form an integral structure.
The lengths of the control links 31, 41 and the carrier links 33, 43, and the position of the aerodynamic center AC on the brake panel 13, 14 is important for proper operation of the toggle assembly 30, 40, as will be described in detail hereinafter, and greatly reduces the force required to deploy and retract the panels 13, 14.
The brake panels 13, 14 are mounted on respective carrier links 33, 43 as best shown in
The panels 13, 14 may be deployed to any desired extension up to the maximum deployment shown in
The lengths of the links 31, 33; 41, 43 and the hinge joints and pivot joints 23, 24; 28, 29; 35, 45 defining connection points between the links, the operating head 27, and the support bracket and mounting structure 18, 22 are specially chosen so as to reduce the force required to move the panels 13, 14 between the deployed and retracted positions. More particularly, the panel 13, 14 has an aerodynamic center AC, which is known in the art and defines a location at which aerodynamic forces applied to the panel 13, 14 during normal operating conditions are balanced.
The position of the aerodynamic center AC is experimentally determined, and can be adjusted by altering the size and shape of the panel 13, 14. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, the aerodynamic center AC is advantageously positioned so as to be at the intersection of a line that is a forward projection of the carrier link 33, 43 and a line that extends through the fixed hinge joint 23, 24 of the control link 31, 41 perpendicular to the actuator axis L. Further, the length of the carrier link 33, 43 (i.e., the distance between the pivot joint 35, 45 and the hinge joint 28, 29) is equal to the distance from the fixed hinge joint 23, 24 to the aerodynamic center AC, and is also equal to the distance between the fixed hinge joint 23, 24 and the pivot joint 35, 45 (i.e., the length of the control link 31, 41), and is further equal to the distance from the pivot joint 35, 45 to the aerodynamic center AC. By using these physical parameters, the aerodynamic center AC of the panels 13, 14 can be properly positioned so as to minimize the force required to deploy and retract the panels 13, 14, as described hereinafter.
When the piston 25 is retracted to move forwardly, the panel 13, 14 opens such that the aerodynamic center AC moves away from the axis L in a direction (arrow B) that is perpendicular to the piston motion (arrow A). Likewise, as the piston 25 is extended to move rearwardly, the aerodynamic center AC of the panel 13, 14 moves toward the axis L in a direction (arrow D) that is perpendicular to piston motion (arrow C).
In either case, since the movement of the panel aerodynamic center AC is perpendicular to the movement of the piston 25, the panels 13, 14 move with virtually no load on the piston 25. In other words, the panel movement exerts no load on the fluid cylinder 21. In this regard, it is “virtually no load” (ideally loadless), but it is noted that mechanical losses, load imbalances as a result of non-ideal air flow, and friction may exert forces that must be overcome, so in practice there is some small resistance to panel movement that must be overcome by the fluid cylinder. Nevertheless, the load is very small, and instead of a hydraulic cylinder or, alternatively an electric drive motor, it is contemplated that the panels 13, 14 could be opened with mechanical linkages, such as push/pull rods and cables that are well known in the art and conventionally used to move ailerons, elevators, and rudders. Thus, the linear actuator of the present invention is intended to encompass all devices known presently or later developed that could be used to move the operating head linearly within the fuselage 11 to open and close the speed brake panels 13, 14.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a reduction of the force required to deploy and retract the panels 13, 14 is a great improvement in the art. It is further noted that those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to speed brakes disposed in the illustrated position on an aircraft. Rather, the present structure is amenable to various modifications. For example, with reference to
Thus, while the invention has been shown and described with respect to a specific embodiment thereof, this is intended for the purpose of illustration rather than limitation and other variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art, all within the intended spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the patent is not to be limited in scope and effect to the specific device herein shown and described nor in any other way that is inconsistent with the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2254591 | Dornier | Sep 1941 | A |
2421870 | Dornier et al. | Jun 1947 | A |
3118636 | Kantrowitz et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3848831 | Geary | Nov 1974 | A |
3942746 | Carter et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4003533 | Carter et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004755 | Hooper | Jan 1977 | A |
4040580 | Schwaerzler | Aug 1977 | A |
4165849 | Fox | Aug 1979 | A |
4372507 | Denniston | Feb 1983 | A |
4566657 | Grow | Jan 1986 | A |
4955958 | Dellinger et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5048773 | Washington et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5735485 | Ciprian et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769362 | Greene et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6491261 | Blake | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6817278 | Hennemann et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
658231 | Oct 1986 | CH |
1349739 | Apr 1974 | GB |
2004108526 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090242698 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61040869 | Mar 2008 | US |