This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/GB2009/050153 filed 17 Feb. 2009, which designated the U.S. and claims priority to GB Application No. 0803719.4 filed 29 Feb. 2008, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to an aerodynamic structure comprising a shock bump extending from its surface.
As described in Holden, H. A. and Babinsky, H. (2003) Shock/boundary layer interaction control using 3D devices In: 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and
Exhibit, Jan. 6-9, 2003, Reno, Nev., USA, Paper no. AIAA 2003-447, as a transonic flow passes over a 3-D shock bump the supersonic local conditions induce a smeared shock foot with a lambda-like wave pattern.
The bumps described in Holden et al. are asymmetrical fore and aft, typically increasing in height and/or width to a maximum height and/or width to the rear of the centre of the shock bump. In other words, the bumps are asymmetrical about a plane which passes through a centre of the shock bump and is normal to the free stream direction. However, to date all evaluations of three-dimensional shock bumps have been restricted to laterally symmetric bump shapes, aligned with the free stream direction. In other words, conventional shock bumps are symmetrical about a plane which passes through a centre of the shock bump, is parallel with the free stream direction, and extends at a right angle to the surface of the aerofoil.
US 2006/0060720 uses a shock control protrusion to generate a shock extending away from the lower surface of a wing.
A first aspect of the invention provides an aerodynamic structure comprising a shock bump extending from its surface, wherein the shock bump is asymmetrical about at least one plane of asymmetry, and wherein the plane of asymmetry:
The shock bump may have no planes of symmetry, or may have a plane of symmetry which is skewed relative to the plane of asymmetry as defined above.
Typically the shock bump has a leading edge, a trailing edge, an inboard edge and an outboard edge. The bump may merge gradually into the surface at its edges or there may be an abrupt concave discontinuity at one or more of its edges.
Typically the shock bump has substantially no sharp convex edges or points.
Typically the shock bump is shaped and positioned so as to modify the structure of a shock which would form adjacent to the surface of the structure in the absence of the shock bump when the structure is moved at transonic speed. This can be contrasted with US 2006/0060720 which uses a shock control protrusion to generate a shock which would not otherwise exist in the absence of the shock control protrusion.
A second aspect of the invention provides an aerodynamic structure comprising a shock bump extending from its surface, wherein the shock bump has no plane of symmetry.
The following comments apply to both aspects of the invention.
Typically the shock bump has an asymmetrical shape when viewed in cross-section in a plane which is normal to the principal direction of air flow over the surface. For instance the asymmetrical cross-sectional shape may have an apex which is offset to one side, typically towards an inboard side of the shock bump. In the embodiments described below the cross-sectional shape is curved with an apex at a single point. Alternatively the apex may be flat.
The apex of the shock bump (whether a line or a flat plateau-like area) may be straight or may follow a line which appears curved when viewed at a right angle to the surface of the aerodynamic structure.
The aerodynamic structure may comprise an aerofoil such as an aircraft wing, horizontal tail plane or control surface; an aircraft structure such as a nacelle, pylon or fin; or any other kind of aerodynamic structure such as a turbine blade.
In the case of an aerofoil the shock bump may be located on a high pressure surface of the aerofoil (that is, the lower surface in the case of an aircraft wing) but more preferably the surface is a low pressure surface of the aerofoil (that is, the upper surface in the case of an aircraft wing). Also the shock bump typically has an apex which is positioned towards the trailing edge of the aerofoil, in other words it is positioned aft of 50% chord. The apex of the bump may be a single point, or a flat plateau. In the case of a plateau then the leading edge of the plateau is positioned towards the trailing edge of the aerofoil.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The footprint of a shock bump is indicated at 3 in
The shock bump protrudes from a nominal surface 8 of the wing, and meets the nominal surface 8 at a leading edge 3a; a trailing edge 3b; an inboard edge 3c; and an outboard edge 3d. The lower portions of the sides of bump are concave and merge gradually into the nominal surface 8. For example in
At transonic speeds a shock 4 forms normal to the upper surface of the wing, and the shock bump 3 is positioned so as to induce a smeared shock foot 5 with a lambda like wave pattern shown in
When the shock bumps 3 are operated at their optimum with the shock 4 just ahead of the apex 7 of the bump as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The shock bump 3 is one of a series of shock bumps distributed along the span of the wing, an additional one of the shock bumps in the series being indicated at 3a in
In contrast with conventional symmetrical shock bumps, the shock bump 3 has no plane of symmetry.
The asymmetric bump configurations described herein offer alternatives that may give improved relaxation of wave drag and shock induced penalties.
The presence of a swept shock or a flow in which the fluid velocity is varying along the span may induce asymmetric wave patterns about a symmetric bump. Such asymmetry may be enhanced for positive benefit by the inclusion of asymmetry on the bump itself The resulting wave pattern would exhibit a different structure on either side of an asymmetric bump.
At an off-design case, for example when trailing vortices are formed, an asymmetric bump may enable differential strength of the flow structures shed from the bumps and this may be used to improve the effectiveness of the bumps. Note that, unlike vortex generators, the bumps have no sharp convex edges or points so the flow remains attached over the bumps when they are operated at their optimum (i.e. when the shock is positioned on the bump just ahead of its apex).
Although the invention has been described above with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that various changes or modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0803719.4 | Feb 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2009/050153 | 2/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/26/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/106872 | 9/3/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2532753 | Beman | Dec 1950 | A |
2800291 | Stephens | Jul 1957 | A |
2898059 | Whitcomb | Aug 1959 | A |
3129908 | Harper | Apr 1964 | A |
3578264 | Kuethe | May 1971 | A |
4067518 | Paterson et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4354648 | Schenk et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4643376 | Vanderhoeven | Feb 1987 | A |
5058837 | Wheeler | Oct 1991 | A |
5433404 | Ashill et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5692709 | Mihora et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6929214 | Ackleson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7118071 | Bogue | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7784737 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8016245 | Hassan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20060021560 | McMillan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060720 | Bogue | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070018055 | Schmidt | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090084906 | Hassan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090294596 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 281 899 | Jul 1972 | GB |
2 296 696 | Jul 1996 | GB |
4-138994 | May 1992 | JP |
WO 0001578 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 2005032938 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/GB2009/050153, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2009/050153, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
UK Search Report for GB 0803719.4, dated Apr. 27, 2008. |
Ogawa et al., “Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings”, Collection of Technical Papers, vol. AIAA 2007-324, (Jan. 8, 2007), pp. 1-23. |
Birkmeyer et al., “Shock Control on a Swept Wing”, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 4, No. 3, (Jan. 1, 2000), pp. 147-156. |
Holden, et al., “Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction Control Using 3D Devices”, 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, vol. 41st, No. Paper 2003-0447, (Jan. 6, 2003), pp. 1-8. |
Dargel, G. et al., “21 Assessment of Shock and Boundary Layer Control Concepts for Hybrid Laminar Flow Wing Design”, Drag Reduction by Shock and Boundary Layer Control. Results of the Project Euroshock II, Supported by the EP Union 1996-1999, vol. 80, (Jan. 1, 2002), pp. 383-414. |
Milholen, W.E. II et al., “On the Application of Contour Bumps for Transonic Drag Reduction (Invited)”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2005-0462, pp. 1-19. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,535, filed Jul. 26, 2010, Wood. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,540, filed Jul. 26, 2010, Wood. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,541, filed Jul. 26, 2010, Wood. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,534, filed Jul. 26, 2010, Wood. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2009/050150, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
UK Search Report for GB 0803727.7, dated Apr. 27, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2009/050152, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
UK Search Report for GB 0803724.4, dated Apr. 27, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2009/050154, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
UK Search Report for GB 0803730.1, dated Jun. 23, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/GB2009/050151, dated Aug. 20, 2009. |
UK Search Report for GB 0803722.8, dated Apr. 27, 2008. |
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,535. |
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,540. |
Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,541. |
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2011 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,534. |
Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2013 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,535. |
Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2012 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,535. |
Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,540. |
Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2012 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,541. |
Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2012 in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,534. |
EP Examination Report dated Jan. 2, 2014 in EP 09713923.2. |
Russian Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2013 in RU 2010139003/11(055759) and English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100301173 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |