Inkjet printers utilize printheads that include an array of hundreds or thousands of small nozzles through which drops of ink and other printing fluids are expelled on to a paper or other print substrate. Tiny particles of printing fluid generated during inkjet printing may accumulate as an aerosol in the air over the print substrate and around the printheads.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures. The figures are not necessarily to scale.
In large commercial inkjet web printers, commonly referred to as inkjet web presses, a continuous web moves past a series of stationary inkjet printheads that dispense ink and other printing fluid on to the moving web. The moving web entrains air and aerosol that surrounds the web. Aerosol carried along the web can interfere with the performance of downstream printheads. For some types of inks and print substrates, it is desirable to treat the print substrate with a chemical bonding agent that helps the ink adhere properly to the substrate. Bonding agents may be applied just like ink, with printheads positioned near the ink printheads. Aerosol generated dispensing bonding agents on to the web presents particular risks because, by its very nature, bonding agent aerosol can create unwanted chemical interactions that clog nozzles on downstream ink printheads.
A new aerosol control system has been developed to help control bonding agent and other aerosols in an inkjet printer. In one example, air is sucked off the top of a moving web or other print substrate into a vacuum duct simultaneously with blowing air at the intake to the vacuum duct and upstream into the moving substrate. The blowing air interrupts the flow and entrainment of aerosol at the vacuum intake, thus allowing more time to more easily suck up aerosol into the vacuum duct. Also, the blowing air dilutes any aerosol that escapes the vacuum duct to help minimize the risk that the aerosol will degrade downstream printheads. This and other examples shown in the figures and described herein illustrate but do not limit the scope of the patent, which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
As used in this document, an “air knife” means a duct or plenum with an elongated outlet configured to discharge a sheet of air when the duct or plenum is pressurized.
Aerosol control system 12 includes a vacuum duct 44 and a pressure duct 46 between each pair of adjacent printheads 14-22. Each pressure duct 46 is positioned downstream from the corresponding vacuum duct 44 in the direction 48 substrate 24 moves past printheads 14-22. Each vacuum duct 44 is connected to a source of negative air pressure 50 to suck air away from the printed side 52 of a substrate 24 leaving a print zone 42. Each pressure duct 46 is connected to a source of positive pressure 54 to blow air on to the printed side 52 of substrate 24 leaving a print zone 42. The blowing air impedes the flow of aerosol along the moving substrate 24 near each intake to a vacuum duct 44 to allow more time to remove aerosol between printheads 14-22. Although vacuum and pressure ducts 44, 46 are shown between each pair of adjacent printheads 14-22 in
Arched printing unit 58 includes a first printing unit 58A for printing on one side of web 24 and a second printing unit 58B for printing on the other side of web 24. First printing unit 58A includes a first series of printheads 14A-22A arranged along an arc on one side of arched printing unit 58. Second printing unit 58B includes a second series of printheads 14B-22B arranged along an arc on the other side of arched printing unit 58. In one example, printheads 14A-22A and 14B-22B dispense a bonding agent (BA), black (K) ink, magenta (M) ink, cyan (C) ink, and yellow (Y) ink. Dryer 60 includes a first dryer 60A for drying one side of web 24 and a second dryer 60B for drying the other side of web 24.
In the example shown in
Pressure duct 46 is positioned downstream from vacuum duct 44. That is to say, the outlet 74 from pressure duct 46 is downstream from the intake 76 to vacuum duct 44. Pressure duct 44 terminates at a narrow, elongated outlet 74 to form an air knife that, when pressurized, discharges a sheet of air 72 across the width of substrate web 24. In this example, as best seen in
Testing shows that discharging air 72 against the downstream side of vacuum duct 44, as shown in
In another example, shown in
Generating a high flow vacuum such as that needed for aerosol control in a large inkjet web press is more expensive than generating a high flow of pressurized air. An aerosol control system that combines blowing and sucking, for example as shown in the figures, allows more effective aerosol control with lower levels of vacuum compared to sucking alone (lower vacuum pressures and/or lower flow rates), thus creating an opportunity for cost savings. Also, the flow of air generated by vacuum alone is sensitive to the distance between the surface of the web and the intake to the vacuum duct. Discharging air into the oncoming flow along the web, for example as described above, reduces the sensitivity of the vacuum to the distance between the surface of the web and the intake to the vacuum duct, thus enabling the use of print bar configurations that are not unduly constrained by the height of the vacuum intake.
As noted at the beginning of this Description, the examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the scope of the patent. Other examples are possible. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be construed to limit the scope of the patent, which is defined in the following Claims.
“A” and “an” as used in the Claims means one or more.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/543,538 filed Jul. 13, 2017 which is itself a Section 371 national stage of international patent application no. PCT/US2015/026593 filed Apr. 20, 2015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5774141 | Cooper et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5915304 | Stiel | Jun 1999 | A |
6305772 | Berkoben et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340225 | Szlucha | Jan 2002 | B1 |
7052124 | Pickup | May 2006 | B2 |
8177316 | Muto | May 2012 | B2 |
8899150 | Walker | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20040245711 | Domoto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060238561 | Carcia et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040886 | Cellura et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100188469 | Ikegami | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208020 | Matsumoto | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110109693 | Ohnishi | May 2011 | A1 |
20120033016 | Stadler | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20140168312 | Mizes et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150085014 | Ishida | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150165770 | Miyakoshi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150273835 | Arimizu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101314283 | Dec 2008 | CN |
2005212323 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2007136725 | Jun 2007 | JP |
WO-2014070140 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Unknown, “Ink Mist Absorbing Function”, UJINUS, May 3, 2015, 4 pages, Retrieved from internet http://www.ujinus.com/?pgname=home/servicecenter_uvled. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190084307 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15543538 | US | |
Child | 16194336 | US |