Embodiments of the present invention relate to aerospace vehicle yaw generating systems and associated methods, including using a spoiler surface to generate a low pressure area on a fuselage of an aerospace vehicle to create a yawing moment.
Aircraft are generally required to have certain directional stability and control characteristics. In order to achieve these characteristics, aircraft generally have vertical stabilizers and rudders. Often, the size of the vertical stabilizers, the size of the rudder(s), and the power of the rudder actuators (including the size and/or operating pressure of the associated hydraulic system(s)) of large multi-engine aircraft is determined by certain engine-out controllability requirements. For example, during aircraft certification, government agencies (e.g., the Federal Aviation Administration) often require manufacturers to determine minimum control speeds on the ground and in flight for engine failures at selected conditions.
The minimum control speed in-flight can include a calibrated airspeed at which, when a critical engine is suddenly made inoperative, it is possible to maintain control of the airplane during specific operating conditions. The minimum control speed on the ground can include a calibrated airspeed during the takeoff run at which, when a critical engine is suddenly made inoperative during selected operating conditions, it is possible to maintain control of the airplane using the rudder control alone while using normal piloting skills. In general, the higher the minimum control speeds an aircraft has, the more runway the aircraft requires for takeoff and/or landing. Accordingly, it is desirable to design aircraft to have low minimum control speeds.
Low minimum control speeds generally require large vertical stabilizing surfaces, larger rudder surfaces, and powerful rudder actuators (e.g., fast moving and/or high force rudder actuators). Larger surfaces and/or powerful actuators increase the weight of an aircraft and in many cases increase the complexity and manufacturing costs. Additionally, larger surfaces can increase drag during various phases of flight (e.g., during cruise flight) resulting in increased fuel usage and costs.
As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,375,793, issued Dec. 27, 1994, which is fully incorporated herein by reference, manufacturers have considered using a fly-by-wire flight control system to momentarily deflect an aileron and/or a spoiler to create drag on a wing to cause a yawing moment to supplement the yawing moment created by the rudder during certain engine-out conditions. Accordingly, the yawing moment is proportional to the amount of drag created and the distance between where the drag force is applied and the aircraft's center of gravity (“c.g.”). In order to increase the yawing moment the drag must be increased and/or the force must be applied further from the c.g. A problem with this solution is that increases in drag reduce the thrust-to-drag ratio of the aircraft, which can degrade engine-out performance (e.g., the ability for the aircraft to accelerate). Another problem with this solution is that creating the drag force further from the aircraft's c.g. requires a spoiler or aileron deflection on the outboard portion of the wing, which in many cases can create a rolling moment on the aircraft. In order to compensate for this rolling moment, other flight control surfaces must be deflected, which can increase pilot workload, increase flight control complexity, and/or add to overall aircraft drag.
The present invention is directed generally toward aerospace vehicle yaw generating systems and associated methods, including using a spoiler surface to generate a pressure differential between a first portion and a second portion of a fuselage of an aerospace vehicle. The pressure differential can in turn create a yawing moment. Aspects of the invention are directed toward a yaw generating system that can include an aerospace vehicle having a fuselage with a first portion and a second portion. The system can further include a movable control surface coupled to the fuselage and extending generally in a horizontal plane. The control surface can be movable to a deflected position, in which the control surface is positioned to create a flow pattern proximate to the fuselage when the aerospace vehicle is located in a flow field. The flow pattern can be positioned to create a pressure differential between the first portion of the fuselage and the second portion of the fuselage. The first and second portions can be located so that the pressure differential produces a yawing moment on the aerospace vehicle.
Other aspects of the invention are directed toward a method for making a yaw generating system that can include locating a movable control surface proximate to a fuselage of an aerospace vehicle. The fuselage can have a first portion and a second portion. The method can further include coupling the movable control surface to the fuselage. The control surface can extend generally in a horizontal plane and can be movable to a deflected position. In the deflected position the control surface can be positioned to create a flow pattern when the aerospace vehicle is located in a flow field. The flow pattern can be located to create a pressure differential between the first portion of the fuselage and the second portion of the fuselage. The first and second portions of the fuselage can be located so that the pressure differential produces a yawing moment on the aerospace vehicle.
Still other aspects of the invention are directed toward a method for creating a yawing moment that can include placing an aerospace vehicle in a flow field. The method can further include positioning a control surface in a deflected position to create a pressure differential between a first portion of a fuselage and a second portion of the fuselage to produce a yawing moment on the aerospace vehicle. The control surface can be coupled to the fuselage and (a) can extend generally in a horizontal plane, (b) can be movable between a stowed position where the control surface is generally faired with a surface of the fuselage and the deflected position where the control surface can extend outwardly from a first side of the fuselage and away from a second side of the fuselage opposite the first side, or (c) both (a) and (b).
The present disclosure describes aerospace vehicle yaw generating systems and associated methods, including using a spoiler surface to generate a pressure differential between a first portion and a second portion of a fuselage of an aerospace vehicle to create a yawing moment. Several specific details of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
In
In other embodiments, the system 100 can include more or fewer wing section(s) 120 and/or wing section(s) 120 having other configurations. For example, a wing section 120 can include a portion of any surface or airfoil section extending generally in a lateral direction (e.g., the surface can extend generally parallel to the Y axis shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the control devices 140 include devices that can generate moments or forces to control the aerospace vehicle 101 during operation or flight (e.g., attitude thrusters, aerodynamic surfaces, and thrust vectoring nozzles). In
In
In
In the illustrated embodiment, the first portion 112 of the fuselage 110 is located on the first side 111 of the fuselage 110 and the second portion 114 of the fuselage 110 is located on the second side 113 of the fuselage 110, but the first and second portions are not located directly opposite one another. In other embodiments, the first and second portions 112, 114 are positioned directly opposite each other relative to the X-Z plane. In still other embodiments, the first and second portions 112, 114 can have other locations that produce the yawing moment Ym1. As discussed above, in
In certain embodiments, the first control surface 142a can be positioned in the deflected position to create a second flow pattern proximate to a flow body 102 (e.g., a directional stabilizer, a vertical tail, a V-tail, a rudder surface, or a ventral fin) when the aerospace vehicle 101 is located in the flow field F. As used herein, flow body 102 refers to any flow body 102 on the aerospace vehicle 101 other than the fuselage. The second flow pattern can be positioned to create a second pressure differential P2 between a first portion 103 of the flow body 102 and a second portion 104 of the flow body 102. In the illustrated embodiment, the first and second portions 103, 104 of the flow body 102 are located so that the second pressure differential P2 produces a second side force S2 some distance from the c.g. of the aerospace vehicle 101 to produce a second yawing moment Ym2 on the aerospace vehicle 101.
In
In certain embodiments, the first yawing moment Ym1 or the first and second yawing moments Ym1, Ym2 created by the first control surface 142a can be used to provide or augment directional stability and/or directional control of the aerospace vehicle 101 during selected operating conditions. Selected operating conditions can include a selected flow field condition relative to the aircraft (e.g., airspeed, angle of attack, angle of sideslip, altitude, and/or ambient pressure), a selected aircraft configuration (e.g., the position of various flight control surfaces and/or the operability of various systems), selected operator commands (e.g., control inputs from a pilot), and/or whether the aerospace vehicle 101 is on the ground or in-flight.
For example, in selected embodiments the first yawing moment Ym1 can be used to provide directional stability and control for an aircraft without vertical stabilizing surfaces throughout the flight envelope. In other embodiments, the first yawing moment Ym1 or the first and second yawing moments Ym1, Ym2 can be used to provide directional stability and/or directional control of an aircraft with a vertical stabilizer and rudder system when the rudder system experiences a partial or complete failure. In still other embodiments, the first yawing moment Ym1 or the first and second yawing moments Ym1, Ym2 can be used to augment directional stability and/or directional control of an aircraft in selected corners of a flight envelope where additional stability and/or control are required.
In yet other embodiments, the first yawing moment Ym1 or the first and second yawing moments Ym1, Ym2 can be used to provide directional stability and/or directional control of an aircraft with an asymmetric thrust condition (e.g., thrust loss, engine failure, or an engine-out condition). In
The first control surface 142a is also used to produce a yawing moment to oppose the thrust yawing moment Ymt. In
In other embodiments, the aerospace vehicle 101 can have more or fewer engines 150 and/or more or fewer rudder surfaces 141. In still other embodiments, the aerospace vehicle can have more or fewer yawing moments acting about the yaw axis Z and/or the yawing moments can have different directions. For example, in certain embodiments the failed engine can also produce a drag force that creates an additional yawing moment and/or the first control surface 142a does not produce the second yawing moment Ym2. In yet other embodiments, the system 100 includes only one control surface 142 to aid other control device(s) 140 in providing directional control during a loss of a critical engine during takeoff. As used herein, a critical engine includes an engine on a multiple engine aircraft that causes the largest deviation from runway centerline when the engine is lost during takeoff and the takeoff is continued. Although in
In certain embodiments, the first control surface 142a can produce the first and/or second yawing moments Ym1, Ym2 without creating a net rolling moment Rmnet about the roll axis X of the aerospace vehicle 101. For example, in
In other embodiments, the aerospace vehicle can have more or fewer rolling moments acting about the roll axis X and/or the rolling moments can have different directions. For example, in certain embodiments the first control surface 142a can be configured so that there is no loss of lift when the first control surface 142a is moved to the deflected position. In other embodiments, the first side force S1, the second side force S2, and/or the rudder side force Sr can be located so that they create no rolling moments or rolling moments in a direction different than that shown in
In
In
In the illustrated embodiment, the sensors 132 can provide information to the computer 135, and the computer 135 can use this information to determine commands for the control devices 140. For example, in certain embodiments the sensors 132 can sense parameters that include airspeed, altitude, temperature, control device positions, angle of attack, side slip angle, attitude, inertial track, and/or the status of various aerospace vehicle systems. Other sensors 132 (e.g., up-lock sensors, down-lock sensors, and/or weight on wheel sensors) can provide information regarding the state of the landing gear system. The inceptors 131 can provide operator commands representing desired aircraft responses to the computer 135. The computer 135 can receive these commands and data from the sensors 132 to determine commands for the control devices 140.
The flight control system can determine when to move a control surface 142 to the deflected position, an amount of control deflection associated with the deflected position, and/or an amount of time a control surface 142 remains in the deflected position, based on the operating condition of the aerospace vehicle and/or the commands. For example, the first and/or second control surfaces 142a, 142b can be moved to the deflected position in response to operator selections made via the inceptors 131, or in response to signals transmitted automatically by the flight control system, or both. In other embodiments, the first and/or second control surfaces 142a, 142b are only controlled automatically by the flight control system 130 and operate only during selected conditions (e.g., only during an asymmetric thrust condition when the aerospace vehicle is operating at a selected airspeed range, is in flight, and/or is on the ground). In still other embodiments, the first and second control surfaces 142a, 142b are only moved to the deflected position via operator input through the inceptors 131.
In yet other embodiments, the flight control system 130 can have more or fewer elements, including more or fewer inceptors 131, sensors 132, actuators 133, computers 135, and/or other elements and can be coupled to more or fewer control devices 140. For example, in certain embodiments the flight control system 130 does not include the computer 135, and the inceptor(s) are configured to provide a direct input (e.g., mechanical or electrical) to the control surfaces 142 or to the actuators 133 coupled to the control surfaces 142. The actuators 133 can include any type of actuator, including mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and/or pneumatic actuators. In other embodiments, control surfaces 142 are mechanically linked to the inceptors 131 without the use of actuators.
The flow patterns created by the control surfaces proximate to the fuselage 110 and the flow body 102, are discussed in further detail with reference to
In
In other embodiments, the first and second control surfaces 142a, 142b can have multiple selected and/or deflected positions. For example,
For example, as shown in
In certain embodiments, features discussed above with reference to
In other embodiments, the system can have different arrangements. For example, in certain embodiments the flow patterns proximate to the fuselage can be asymmetrical, but positioned so that the net yawing moments about the yaw axis are balanced before the first or second control surface 142a, 142b is moved to a deflected position. In yet other embodiments, the first control surface 142a can be deflected in a downward direction to a third deflected position to affect the flow pattern proximate to bottom portions of the fuselage or other portions of the aerospace vehicle to generate a side force and produce a yawing moment. For example, the first control surface 142a could include a flap that is deflected downwardly to generate a side force and produce a yawing moment. In certain embodiments, the first control surface 142a can be deflected upwardly to a first deflected position as shown in
A feature of at least some of the embodiments discussed above is that a control surface coupled to a wing section can be used to produce a yawing moment on an aerospace vehicle. For example, spoiler surfaces can be used to provide directional stability and/or control during one or more selected operating conditions. In certain embodiments, this feature can allow a reduction in vertical tail size or a reduction in minimum control speed (e.g., on the ground or in flight) because the spoiler surface can be used to augment yaw control during an asymmetric thrust condition at low air speeds. For example, if an aircraft loses an engine at low speed during the takeoff roll, a control surface can be moved to a deflected position to create a pressure differential on the fuselage. In turn, the differential pressure can create a yawing moment that aids the rudder and vertical tail surfaces in opposing the yawing moment generated by the engine-out condition. As the aircraft continues to accelerate during the takeoff roll and the rudder and vertical tail surfaces become more effective, the spoiler surface can be stowed. An advantage to this feature is that a lower minimum control speed can allow the aircraft to take off with more weight. Another advantage of this feature is that the vertical tail size of an aircraft can be reduced while maintaining the same minimum control speed, requiring less material to produce the vertical tail, and thereby reducing manufacturing costs and aircraft weight as compared to aircraft requiring a larger vertical tail. A smaller vertical tail can also result in less drag, resulting in a reduction in operating cost. In the limit, the tail can be eliminated.
The power of the rudder actuator can also affect the minimum control speeds associated with an aircraft. For example, in certain situations a more powerful rudder actuator can move a rudder surface to a position required to compensate for an engine loss more quickly than a less powerful actuator. Additionally, in certain instances a more powerful rudder actuator can deflect a rudder surface a larger amount against specified aerodynamic loads than a less powerful actuator, thereby providing a larger yawing moment to compensate for the yaw created by the engine loss. A feature of some of the embodiments described above is that a control surface can be moved to a deflected position to create a pressure differential on a fuselage. In turn, the differential pressure can create a yawing moment that aids the yawing moment created by the rudder surface. Accordingly, under certain circumstances, various embodiments of the invention can allow a less powerful rudder actuator to be used on a specified aircraft while maintaining the same minimum control speed(s). An advantage of this feature is that less powerful actuators can be less expensive to produce and maintain, thereby allowing manufacturing and maintenance costs to be reduced. In some cases, actuators (e.g., redundant actuators) can be eliminated and instead the control surface used to create a differential pressure on the fuselage can be relied on to provide backup yaw control and/or stability.
Because a control surface can be used to create a pressure differential on a fuselage, thereby creating a yawing moment, larger engines can be installed on an aircraft (a) while retaining the same minimum control speed(s) associated with the smaller engines and (b) without increasing the size of the vertical tail surfaces, the size of the rudder surfaces, and the power of the rudder actuators. For example, in certain circumstances a flight control computer can be programmed (e.g., reprogrammed) to reschedule the use of the control surface and/or the flight control computer can be programmed to account for increases in thrust. An advantage of this feature is that larger engines can be installed on aircraft without the associated expense of modifying the vertical tail, rudder surfaces, and/or rudder actuators.
In other embodiments, the control surface(s) can be used to reduce the size of various stability surfaces during various operating conditions. For example, the control surface(s) can be used to augment directional stability and/or provide directional control during extreme operating conditions (e.g., at a corner of a flight envelope) or with various system failures. By reducing the size or eliminating various stability surfaces or control devices, aircraft weight and drag can be reduced providing a savings in operating costs.
In other embodiments, the yaw generating system can have other arrangements. For example, a yaw generating system 800 can have control surfaces 842 coupled to a fuselage 810 of an aerospace vehicle 801 without being connected to wing sections 820. In
In
The yaw generating system 800 shown in
In
The yaw generating system 1000 shown in
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the invention. Additionally, aspects of the invention described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. For example, although some of the above embodiments have shown a single control surface on a wing section, in other embodiments a wing section can have multiple control surfaces having the same or different deflected positions. Although advantages associated with certain embodiments of the invention have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages. Additionally, not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1770575 | Ksoll | Jul 1930 | A |
2387492 | Blaylock et al. | Oct 1945 | A |
2422296 | Flader et al. | Jun 1947 | A |
2458900 | Emy | Jan 1949 | A |
2652812 | Fenzl | Sep 1953 | A |
2665084 | Feeney et al. | Jan 1954 | A |
2864239 | Taylor | Dec 1958 | A |
2891740 | Campbell | Jun 1959 | A |
2892312 | Allen et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
2920844 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
2990144 | Hougland | Jun 1961 | A |
2990145 | Hougland | Jun 1961 | A |
3102607 | Roberts | Sep 1963 | A |
3112089 | Dornier | Nov 1963 | A |
3136504 | Carr | Jun 1964 | A |
3241077 | Smyth et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3347498 | Priestley et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3374966 | Howard | Mar 1968 | A |
3375998 | Alvarez-Calderon | Apr 1968 | A |
3447763 | Allcock | Jun 1969 | A |
3504870 | Cole et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3556439 | Autry et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3653611 | Trupp et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3704828 | Studer et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3704843 | Jenny | Dec 1972 | A |
3734432 | Low | May 1973 | A |
3743219 | Gorges | Jul 1973 | A |
3794276 | Maltby et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3831886 | Burdges et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3836099 | O'Neill et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3837601 | Cole | Sep 1974 | A |
3862730 | Heiney | Jan 1975 | A |
3902686 | Wykes et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3910530 | James et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3941334 | Cole | Mar 1976 | A |
3941341 | Brogdon, Jr. | Mar 1976 | A |
3968946 | Cole | Jul 1976 | A |
3992979 | Smith | Nov 1976 | A |
3994451 | Cole | Nov 1976 | A |
4015787 | Maieli et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4117996 | Sherman | Oct 1978 | A |
4120470 | Whitener | Oct 1978 | A |
4131253 | Zapel | Dec 1978 | A |
4146200 | Borzachillo | Mar 1979 | A |
4171787 | Zapel | Oct 1979 | A |
4189120 | Wang | Feb 1980 | A |
4189121 | Harper et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4189122 | Miller | Feb 1980 | A |
4200253 | Rowarth | Apr 1980 | A |
4240255 | Benilan | Dec 1980 | A |
4262868 | Dean | Apr 1981 | A |
4275942 | Steidl | Jun 1981 | A |
4285482 | Lewis | Aug 1981 | A |
4293110 | Middleton | Oct 1981 | A |
4312486 | McKinney | Jan 1982 | A |
4351502 | Statkus | Sep 1982 | A |
4353517 | Rudolph | Oct 1982 | A |
4368937 | Palombo et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4384693 | Pauly | May 1983 | A |
4427168 | McKinney | Jan 1984 | A |
4441675 | Boehringer | Apr 1984 | A |
4455004 | Whitaker | Jun 1984 | A |
4461449 | Turner | Jul 1984 | A |
4466586 | Burnham | Aug 1984 | A |
4471927 | Rudolph | Sep 1984 | A |
4472780 | Chenoweth et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4475702 | Cole | Oct 1984 | A |
4479620 | Rogers et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4485992 | Rao | Dec 1984 | A |
4496121 | Berlin | Jan 1985 | A |
4498646 | Proksch | Feb 1985 | A |
4533096 | Baker | Aug 1985 | A |
4553722 | Cole | Nov 1985 | A |
4562546 | Wykes | Dec 1985 | A |
4575030 | Gratzer | Mar 1986 | A |
4576347 | Opsahl | Mar 1986 | A |
4598888 | Beteille | Jul 1986 | A |
4598890 | Herzog et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4637573 | Perin | Jan 1987 | A |
4649484 | Herzog et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4650140 | Cole | Mar 1987 | A |
4700911 | Zimmer | Oct 1987 | A |
4702441 | Wang | Oct 1987 | A |
4706902 | Destuynder | Nov 1987 | A |
4706913 | Cole | Nov 1987 | A |
4717097 | Sepstrup | Jan 1988 | A |
4729528 | Borzachillo | Mar 1988 | A |
4744532 | Ziegler et al. | May 1988 | A |
4784355 | Brine | Nov 1988 | A |
4786013 | Pohl | Nov 1988 | A |
4796192 | Lewis | Jan 1989 | A |
4814764 | Middleton | Mar 1989 | A |
4821981 | Gangsaas | Apr 1989 | A |
4856735 | Lotz | Aug 1989 | A |
4899284 | Lewis | Feb 1990 | A |
4962902 | Fortes | Oct 1990 | A |
5027893 | Cetinkaya | Jul 1991 | A |
5046688 | Woods | Sep 1991 | A |
5050081 | Abbott et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060889 | Nadkarni et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072893 | Chakravarty | Dec 1991 | A |
5074495 | Raymond | Dec 1991 | A |
5082207 | Tulinius | Jan 1992 | A |
5082208 | Matich | Jan 1992 | A |
5088665 | Vijgen | Feb 1992 | A |
5094411 | Rao | Mar 1992 | A |
5094412 | Narramore | Mar 1992 | A |
5100082 | Archung | Mar 1992 | A |
5114100 | Rudolph | May 1992 | A |
5129597 | Manthey | Jul 1992 | A |
5135186 | Ako | Aug 1992 | A |
5158252 | Sakurai | Oct 1992 | A |
5167383 | Nozaki | Dec 1992 | A |
5186416 | Fabre | Feb 1993 | A |
5203619 | Welsch | Apr 1993 | A |
5207400 | Jennings | May 1993 | A |
5224667 | Lacabanne | Jul 1993 | A |
5244269 | Harriehausen | Sep 1993 | A |
5259293 | Brunner | Nov 1993 | A |
5351914 | Nagao | Oct 1994 | A |
5375793 | Rivron et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375794 | Bleeg | Dec 1994 | A |
5420582 | Kubbat | May 1995 | A |
5441218 | Mueller | Aug 1995 | A |
5452865 | Tran | Sep 1995 | A |
5458304 | Gilbert | Oct 1995 | A |
5474265 | Capbern | Dec 1995 | A |
5493497 | Buus | Feb 1996 | A |
5531402 | Dahl | Jul 1996 | A |
5535852 | Bishop | Jul 1996 | A |
5544847 | Bliesner | Aug 1996 | A |
5549260 | Reed | Aug 1996 | A |
5564652 | Trimbath | Oct 1996 | A |
5598991 | Nadkarni | Feb 1997 | A |
5600220 | Thoraval | Feb 1997 | A |
5609020 | Jackson | Mar 1997 | A |
5657949 | Deck | Aug 1997 | A |
5667166 | Tran | Sep 1997 | A |
5669582 | Bryant | Sep 1997 | A |
5680124 | Bedell | Oct 1997 | A |
5686907 | Bedell | Nov 1997 | A |
5743490 | Gillingham | Apr 1998 | A |
5788190 | Siers | Aug 1998 | A |
5833173 | Tran | Nov 1998 | A |
5860625 | Tran | Jan 1999 | A |
5875998 | Gleine | Mar 1999 | A |
5908176 | Gilyard | Jun 1999 | A |
5921506 | Appa | Jul 1999 | A |
5927656 | Hinkleman | Jul 1999 | A |
5934615 | Treichler | Aug 1999 | A |
5978715 | Briffe | Nov 1999 | A |
5984230 | Drazi | Nov 1999 | A |
6015117 | Broadbent | Jan 2000 | A |
6045204 | Frazier | Apr 2000 | A |
6064923 | Bilange et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073624 | Laurent | Jun 2000 | A |
6076767 | Farley et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076776 | Breitbach | Jun 2000 | A |
6109567 | Munoz | Aug 2000 | A |
6161801 | Kelm | Dec 2000 | A |
6168117 | Shinagawa | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189830 | Schnelz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213433 | Gruensfelder | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227487 | Clark | May 2001 | B1 |
6293497 | Kelley-Wickemeyer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328265 | Dizdarevic | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349798 | McKay | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364254 | May | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375126 | Sakurai | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416017 | Becker | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443394 | Weisend | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446911 | Yount et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484969 | Sprenger | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491261 | Blake | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499577 | Kitamoto et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6536714 | Gleine et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6547183 | Farnsworth | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554229 | Lam | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561463 | Yount et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591169 | Jones | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598829 | Kamstra | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598834 | Nettle | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601801 | Prow | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622972 | Urnes | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625982 | Van Den Bossche | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6644599 | Perez | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651930 | Gautier et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6745113 | Griffin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796534 | Beyer et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799739 | Jones | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6802475 | Davies et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20020046087 | Hey | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020074459 | Gleine et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100842 | Perez | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030058134 | Sherry | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030132860 | Feyereisen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030183728 | Huynh | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004162 | Beyer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046087 | Beyer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059474 | Boorman | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040195464 | Vassberg et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040245386 | Huynh | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011994 | Sakurai et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050017126 | McLean et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050242234 | Mahmulyin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060016927 | Bath et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 103 038 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 293 018 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 497 660 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 742 142 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 743 243 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 947 421 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1008515 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 016 589 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 353 253 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 375 343 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2 144 688 | Mar 1985 | GB |
07309298 | Nov 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060284022 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |